1. Sheathless Versus Sheathed Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Implantation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
- Author
-
Samuel Heuts, Roberto Lorusso, Michele di Mauro, Federica Jiritano, Roberto Scrofani, Carlo Antona, Guglielmo Actis Dato, Paolo Centofanti, Sandro Ferrarese, Matteo Matteucci, Antonio Miceli, Mattia Glauber, Enrico Vizzardi, Sandro Sponga, Igor Vendramin, Andrea Garatti, Carlo de Vincentiis, Michele De Bonis, Marina Pieri, Giovanni Troise, Margherita Dalla Tomba, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino, RS: Carim - V04 Surgical intervention, MUMC+: MA Med Staf Artsass CTC (9), MUMC+: MA Cardiothoracale Chirurgie (3), and CTC
- Subjects
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Abstract
The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most widely available mechanical support device, but its use has been disputed in recent decades. Although several efforts have been made to reduce the associated complication rate, contemporary data on this matter is lacking. The present study aims to evaluate the differences in vascular complications between the sheathless and the sheathed IABP implantation technique in cardiac surgery patients. A retrospective multi-center cohort, consisting of patients treated in 8 cardiac surgical centers, was evaluated. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery with peri-operative IABP support were included. Primary outcome was a composite end point of vascular complications. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and a multivariable regression model was applied to evaluate predictors of vascular complications. The unmatched cohort consisted of 2,615 patients (sheathless n = 1,414, 54%, sheathed n = 1,201, 46%). A total of 878 patients were matched (n = 439 for both groups). The composite vascular complication end point occurred in 3% of patients in the sheathless group, compared with 8% in the sheathed group (p
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF