Search

PVA has been recently proved as an effective treatment to cure AF. This study establishes the feasibility and efficacy of NAVX® (Endocardial Solutions) in CPVA.Methods 30 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (20) or permanent (10) AF underwent ablation. Standard 4 mm irrigated tip catheters were used in all patients. Circumferential linear lesions were created around ipsilateral veins, using NAVX® guidance. Three ablation lines were added in all pts to prevent postablation reentry (LIPV to mitral valve, roof line, between left and right inferior PVOs). Ablation of IVC-TA isthmus was performed in all pts. Voltage map and activation sequence were then generated to validate the ostial isolation and isthmuses block. Results No procedural complications. Duration of left atrial procedure: 40+8 minutes (8+2 min mapping, 32+8 min ablation and postablation remapping). Total fluoroscopy time: 10 ± 8 min. At 6-months follow up, 17 (85 %) of patients with PAF and 8 (80%) of patients with CAF were free from atrial fibrillation symptomatically and on Holter monitoring. Conclusions AF Ablation can be performed both safely and effectively using the NAVX system. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: This study was designed to investigate the potential of circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) to maintain sinus rhythm (SR) over time, thus reducing mortality and morbidity while enhancing quality of life (QoL).Background: Circumferential PV ablation is safe and effective, but the long-term outcomes and its impact on QoL have not been assessed or compared with those for medical therapy.Methods: We examined the clinical course of 1,171 consecutive patients with symptomatic AF who were referred to us between January 1998 and March 2001. The 589 ablated patients were compared with the 582 who received antiarrhythmic medications for SR control. The QoL of 109 ablated and 102 medically treated patients was measured with the SF-36 survey.Results: Median follow-up was 900 days (range 161 to 1,508 days). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed observed survival for ablated patients was longer than among patients treated medically (p < 0.001), and not different from that expected for healthy persons of the same gender and calendar year of birth (p = 0.55). Cox proportional-hazards model revealed in the ablation group hazard ratios of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.68; p < 0.001) for all-cause mortality, of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.64; p < 0.001) for morbidities mainly due to heart failure and ischemic cerebrovascular events, and of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37; p < 0.001) for AF recurrence. Ablated patients' QoL, different from patients treated medically, reached normative levels at six months and remained unchanged at one year.Conclusions: Pulmonary vein ablation improves mortality, morbidity, and QoL as compared with medical therapy. Our findings pave the way for randomized trials to prospect a wider application of ablation therapy for AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Accurate left atrial (LA) mapping is essential for creating lesions at the LA-pulmonary vein (PV) junction, avoiding PV stenosis., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to establish whether endocardial impedance varies within the LA and PVs and whether it is a useful tool for mapping and ablation., Methods: Pilot Phase: Three-dimensional LA maps were created using CARTO. Impedance (Z) was measured using a radiofrequency generator at multiple points in the LA, PV ostia (PVO), and deep PVs in 79 patients undergoing their first AF ablation (group 1) and 29 patients undergoing repeat CPVA (group 2). Prospective Phase: In an additional 20 patients, using pilot phase data, one operator defined catheter tip location as either LA or PVO based on CARTO and fluoroscopy. A second operator blinded to CARTO simultaneously did the same based on impedance at 15 +/- 4 points per patient., Results: Group 1: Z(LA) was 99.4 +/- 9.0 omega. Z(PVO) was higher (109.2 +/- 8.5 omega), rising further as the catheter advanced into deep PV (137 omega +/- 18). Z(PVO) differed from Z(LA) by 9 +/- 4 omega. Group 2 had a lower Z(LA) and Z(PVO) compared with group 1 (P <.05). Impedance monitoring differentiated between LA and PVO, with 91% specificity and sensitivity, 96% positive predictive value, and 81% negative predictive value. At 3-month follow-up, no patients had evidence of PV stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging., Conclusion: Impedance mapping reliably identifies the LA-PV transitional zone, facilitating AF ablation, and its use is associated with a low incidence of PV stenosis.

Objectives: Few data have been published on transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with mitral valve prostheses. Thus, we sought to report our experience., Background: Ablation is an effective treatment for AF. Patients with prosthetic mitral valves represent a special group because of an increased risk from the ablation procedure due to the possibility of damage to the prosthetic valve., Methods: Between July 2001 and July 2003, 26 patients with mitral valve prostheses (MVP) underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for AF. A matched group of 52 ablated patients without MVP acted as control subjects. After a blanking period of three months, a follow-up of 12 months was considered for MVP patients and controls. Holter recordings were performed in all subjects at 3, 6, and 12 months., Results: Radiation exposure was higher in the MVP group, with fluoroscopy times of 35.3 +/- 21 min versus 20.9 +/- 15 min in controls. At the end of follow-up, 73% of MVP patients were in sinus rhythm, compared with 75% of controls. Atrial tachycardia occurred in six (23%) MVP patients, requiring repeat ablation in three, and one (2%) control subject, which settled without treatment. One transient ischemic attack and one femoral pseudoaneurysm occurred in the MVP group. No complications occurred in the control group., Conclusions: Ablation of AF in patients with MVP is feasible, with outcomes similar to those of standard patients. Complications were higher among MVP patients with a greater radiation exposure and a higher incidence of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.

Background: There are no data to evaluate the relationship between autonomic nerve function modification and recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA). This study assesses the incremental benefit of vagal denervation by radiofrequency in preventing recurrent AF in a large series of patients undergoing CPVA for paroxysmal AF., Methods and Results: Data were collected on 297 patients undergoing CPVA for paroxysmal AF. Abolition of all evoked vagal reflexes around all pulmonary vein ostia was defined as complete vagal denervation (CVD) and was obtained in 34.3% of patients. Follow-up ended at 12 months. Heart rate variability attenuation, consistent with vagal withdrawal, was detectable for up to 3 months after CPVA, particularly in patients with reflexes and CVD, who were less likely to have recurrent AF than those without reflexes (P=0.0002, log-rank test). Only the percentage area of left atrial isolation and CVD were predictors of AF recurrence after CPVA (P<0.001 and P=0.025, respectively)., Conclusions: This study suggests that adjunctive CVD during CPVA significantly reduces recurrence of AF at 12 months.

The dominance of the left atrium (LA) in the pulmonary vein (PV) regions for triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF) is now widely recognized. Radiofrequency (RF) PV isolation with electroanatomical guidance has recently emerged as a promising approach for AF treatment. We report the clinical outcome of the procedure in 251 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (n = 179) or permanent (n = 72) AF. Circular RF lesions were deployed transseptally during sinus rhythm or AF at 5 mm from PV ostia. Procedural and mapping times were 112 +/- 32 min and 75 +/- 27 min, respectively, with 29 +/- 11 min of fluoroscopy. Complete lesions (peak-to-peak bipolar electrogram amplitude < 0.1 mV inside the line and no double potentials) were achieved in 85% of the veins treated. Sinus rhythm was restored during RF delivery in 52% and by DC shock in the remaining. Major complications (cardiac tamponade) occurred in 3%. Extent of ablated area was 4.9 +/- 0.5 cm2, accounting for 28 +/- 9% of the total LA map surface. After 11 +/- 5 months, procedure success rates (freedom from AF without antiarrhythmic drugs) were 85% for paroxysmal and 68% for permanent AF. No PV stenoses were detected. By univariate analysis, an increased risk of recurrence was predicted by LA dilation (diameter > 50 mm), AF duration, and a low ablated area (< 15% of total LA surface). After adjustment, only the latter variable continued to be significant (odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.6-5.8). In conclusion, RF PV isolation is safe and effective in either paroxysmal or permanent AF. Patients with enlarged left atrium may require wider lesions to achieve AF suppression.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a new dialysis treatment that combines convective and diffusive forces. In order to assess the efficiency of a peculiar model of hypertonic HDF (H HDF), we studied eight uremic patients when they were undergoing five sessions of H HDF of 180 minutes duration and two sessions of standard hemodialysis (HD) of 270 minutes duration with a comparable blood (approximately 400 mL/min) and dialysate flow rate (approximately 520 mL/min). The plasma water clearances (Kw) of small [urea (U), creatinine (C), uric acid (UA), and phosphorus (P)] and middle molecules [netilmicin (N) and inulin (I)] were exceedingly higher in H HDF than in HD; however, because of the different treatment times, U and C removal (R) in HD overcame and UA and P R in HD equalized that in H HDF. The factor time was not sufficient to HD to compensate for the large difference in Kw in the case of I. Additional studies were performed in seven out of the eight patients after two sessions of H HDF and one session of HD. Two significantly higher rebounds were observed when comparing both treatments: for U after HD and for parathyroid hormone (PTH) after H HDF; however, PTH Cx/Cs ratios (ratios of the plasma water concentration of PTH at any postdialysis time to the plasma water concentration of PTH at the start of the run) were not different in both treatments, meaning that there was an increased PTH secretion in the early post H HDF hours in order to compensate for the larger PTH R with H HDF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)