Search

During expression of biotherapeutic proteins, complex mixtures of additional proteins are also produced by normal expression machinery of the host cell (termed 'host cell proteins,' or HCP). HCPs pose a potential impact to patient safety and product efficacy, and therefore must be well-characterized and the ability of the process to clear these proteins must be demonstrated. Due to the complexity of HCP, the method(s) used for monitoring must be demonstrated to provide sufficient information about relevant proteins. The most commonly used analytical method for monitoring HCP is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To ensure development of a suitable HCP ELISA, careful selection of critical reagents (anti-HCP antibodies and analytical standard) is crucial. During a recent major update to the manufacturing process of a biotherapeutic, we re-evaluated the suitability of the existing HCP ELISA for monitoring the HCP population in the updated process. In the evaluation, we compared a process-specific ELISA to a platform ELISA. Despite qualitative differences in the HCP profiles in 2D PAGE, LC-MS/MS showed that the HCP populations in the two analytical standards were similar. The process-specific HCP antibody had adequate HCP coverage, but was more sensitive to a few dominant proteins that were present in the upstream purification process. The platform HCP antibody had very broad coverage and additionally, could detect the majority of potential HCP impurities from this process. Furthermore, the platform HCP antibody was not biased toward a few dominant proteins and was more sensitive in the downstream purification process. Due to its broad HCP coverage and sensitivity, we conclude that our platform HCP ELISA method is superior to the process-specific HCP ELISA method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prolonged cold ischemia is thought to exacerbate ischemia–reperfusion injury and graft coronary artery disease (GCAD). We investigated the effect of varying lengths of cold ischemia on inflammation and apoptosis during ischemia–reperfusion injury and correlated this with the degree of GCAD in rat cardiac allografts. Methods: PVG rat (RT1c) hearts subjected to 30, 60, 90, 120, or 150 minutes of cold ischemia were heterotopically transplanted into ACI rats (RT1a). Grafts were procured after 4 hours of reperfusion and analyzed for superoxide generation, myeloperoxidase activity, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (MCP-1/CCL2) production, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and caspase-2, -3, -8, -9 activities. Additional transplanted animals received cyclosporine A (7.5 mg/kg/day) for 10 days as chronic rejection models. Indices of GCAD were determined at 90 days. Results: A direct linear correlation was found between cold ischemic time, ischemia–reperfusion injury, and GCAD. Superoxide generation, myeloperoxidase activity, TNF-α, IL-1β, MCP-1/CCL2 production, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and caspase-2, -3, -8, and -9 activities increased with ischemic time, peaking at 120 minutes and plateauing at 150 minutes. GCAD, assessed by the percentage of luminal narrowing, the intima/media ratio, and the percentage of diseased vessels, worsened with increased ischemic time, peaking at 120 minutes and plateauing at 150 minutes. All tested variables in both the acute and chronic phases were significantly increased with 120-minute ischemia compared with 30-minute ischemia. Conclusions: These data indicate that the degree of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and inflammatory response in cardiac allografts during ischemia–reperfusion injury depends on the duration of cold ischemia. More important, that prolonged cold ischemia correlates with increased GCAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]