Search

Purpose: To compare the development of macular atrophy (MA) in eyes treated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) with those treated with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections in the Archway trial., Design: Preplanned exploratory analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial., Participants: Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) diagnosed within 9 months of screening, previously treated with and responsive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy., Methods: Eyes were randomized 3:2 to treatment with the PDS 100 mg/mL with fixed 24-week (Q24W) refill-exchanges (PDS Q24W) or intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections every 4 weeks (monthly ranibizumab)., Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence, incidence, and progression of MA., Results: The analysis population consisted of 415 eyes (248 and 167 eyes in the PDS Q24W and monthly ranibizumab arms, respectively). At study baseline, MA was observed in 22.3% (PDS Q24W) and 20.4% (monthly ranibizumab) of eyes. At week 96, prevalence of MA was 39.1% and 39.2% while incidence of new MA in eyes without MA at baseline was 20.0% and 22.6% in the PDS Q24W and monthly ranibizumab arms, respectively. In eyes without baseline MA, mean MA area at week 96 was 0.4 in the PDS Q24W arm and 3.8 mm 2 in the monthly ranibizumab arm with a difference of 3.4mm 2 , (P = 0.054) favoring PDS. In eyes with baseline MA, mean change in MA area from baseline to week 96 was +2.2 mm 2 for both the PDS Q24W and monthly ranibizumab arms., Conclusions: In the Archway trial, which compared PDS Q24W with monthly ranibizumab injections for nAMD treatment over 2 years, prevalence and incidence of MA were similar between arms over the study duration. In eyes without baseline MA, PDS-treated eyes had less MA area by 3.4 mm 2 , a potentially clinically meaningful (although not statistically significant) difference. The results of this prespecified exploratory analysis suggest that PDS treatment is not associated with higher incidence or progression of MA when compared with monthly injections of ranibizumab. In eyes without baseline MA, the progression of atrophy area was 4 times less in PDS-treated eyes. Additional studies could further elucidate this observation., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is approved in the United States for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The United States Prescribing Information has a Boxed Warning for endophthalmitis and reports the incidence rate in patients developing endophthalmitis after receiving the PDS compared with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab. Endophthalmitis cases noted in the Boxed Warning, treatment outcomes, potential contributing factors, and potential mitigations are summarized., Design: Retrospective review of endophthalmitis cases in PDS-treated patients in the phase II Ladder (NCT02510794) and phase III Archway (NCT03677934) and Portal (NCT03683251) trials., Participants: Endophthalmitis cases in the pooled all-PDS safety population (N = 555) including PDS patients in Ladder, Archway, or Portal., Methods: Ladder patients received PDS (10, 40, or 100 mg/ml) with pro re nata refill-exchanges. Archway patients received PDS 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W). Portal patients received PDS Q24W from day 1., Main Outcome Measures: Clinical features, management, and visual outcomes were summarized. Cases were summarized by date of PDS implant and/or refill, other prior invasive procedures/refills, and preceding/concurrent conjunctival complications., Results: Twelve endophthalmitis events were reported in 11 patients (11/555 [2.0%]) through March 12, 2021. All were cultured (3 were culture positive) and treated with intravitreal antibiotics. Two cases (2/555 [0.4%]) occurred in the immediate postoperative period (days 5 and 6). Nine cases occurred later (day range: 57-853), including 4 before the first refill-exchange (day range: 57-161). Five patients received between 1 and 11 refill-exchanges before the event (onset: 6-168 days after last refill-exchange). Seven cases (7/11 [63.6%]) had preceding/concurrent conjunctival complications. At last follow-up, 7 patients recovered vision to study baseline levels or ≥20/40; 4 patients experienced vision loss of ≥15 ETDRS letters., Conclusions: Endophthalmitis is a serious complication that can endanger vision after any ocular procedure, including PDS implantation. Most, but not all, of this limited series of endophthalmitis cases were late onset, associated with conjunctival breach, and recovered vision with treatment. Meticulous attention to PDS surgical techniques with vigilant monitoring of conjunctiva during follow-up may minimize risk of endophthalmitis. Prompt treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is approved in the United States for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Portal (NCT03683251) is evaluating long-term safety and tolerability of the PDS in patients with nAMD who completed the phase II Ladder (NCT02510794) or phase III Archway (NCT03677934) trials., Design: Multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, extension clinical trial., Participants: All-PDS safety population (N = 555) comprises patients enrolled in Portal who completed Ladder or Archway. Because of data availability, efficacy population comprises Ladder-to-Portal patients only: patients who previously received PDS 10, 40, or 100 mg/mL pro re nata (as-needed [PRN]; n = 58, 62, and 59, respectively) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections (monthly ranibizumab; n = 41) in Ladder and subsequently enrolled in Portal., Methods: Ladder patients received PDS refill-exchanges PRN or monthly ranibizumab. Archway patients received PDS 100 mg/mL with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (Q24W) or monthly ranibizumab. Once enrolled in Portal, all patients receive PDS Q24W from day 1., Main Outcome Measures: Ocular adverse events of special interest (AESIs); changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and center point thickness (CPT); supplemental ranibizumab treatment between refill-exchange procedures; and PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire results., Results: In the All-PDS safety population (mean follow-up, 111 weeks), 137 (24.7%) patients had ≥1 ocular AESI; most common were cataract (11.4%), vitreous hemorrhage (6.1%), and conjunctival thickening (bleb)/filtering bleb leak (6.3%). Endophthalmitis occurred in 11 of 555 (2.0%) patients. For Ladder-to-Portal patients previously treated with PDS 100 mg/mL or monthly ranibizumab, BCVA remained stable from baseline to month 48; mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline were 0.1 (-6.6 to 6.8; n = 31) and 2.3 (-9.4 to 14.1; n = 15) letters, respectively; CPT remained stable through month 48. Approximately 95% of patients did not need supplemental treatment before each refill-exchange for >2 years since Portal enrollment. Of Ladder-to-Portal previous monthly ranibizumab patients, 92% preferred the PDS over injections., Conclusions: Interim results from Portal suggest 4-year maintenance of visual/anatomic outcomes with PDS 100 mg/mL, with the PDS preferred to monthly injections. Long-term safety profile of the PDS is well characterized., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Utilization of maternal and child interventions is typically tracked in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using coverage estimates from population representative surveys. These estimates cannot be directly applied to assess resource gaps in intervention delivery for which data on the population eligible is required. Moreover, coverage improvements may not necessarily reflect an expansion in utilization because of a decline in the population eligible. We develop a method to estimate the populations eligible for interventions across the continuum of care. The method uses data from the World Population Prospects and the Demographic Health Survey, data sources which are available for most LMICs. Additionally, we develop a method to estimate the eligible population covered by each intervention. Using the illustration of India, we estimate populations eligible for, and covered by interventions during preconception, pregnancy, delivery, lactation, and childhood. We find that between 2015 and 2020, the eligible population declined for all beneficiary groups. Additionally, coverage expansion was not entirely driven by an increase in the population accessing an intervention, but rather also by a decline in the eligible population. Our illustration highlights the importance of including population estimates alongside coverage for interventions, particularly in LMIC contexts due to changing fertility dynamics., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.)

Background: High coverage of nutrition-specific interventions is critical to meet global nutrition targets, and it is imperative to understand how to attain it. We examined trends and inequalities in the coverage of interventions in India and the role of the National Nutrition Mission (NNM) in achieving improvements., Methods: We conducted trends and equity analysis of 30 interventions using two rounds of National Family Health Survey data (2015-2016, n=1 78 874, and 2019-2021, n=1 70 697). We also compared coverage between states that received incentives and monitoring under NNM and those that did not. We reviewed programme documents and grey literature to construct a policy timeline to trace pathways to coverage improvement and consulted with stakeholders to confirm interpretation of findings., Findings: Between 2016 and 2021, coverage improved significantly for nearly all interventions (~1-22 percentage points (pp) during pregnancy, ~7-20 pp during delivery/postpartum and~5-17 pp during early childhood). Improvements in coverage were higher among the poor and in rural areas compared with the rich and in urban areas, respectively; wealth and residence gaps narrowed for most interventions. These improvements could be traced to community mobilisation, technology and monitoring under NNM. Improvements in coverage of growth monitoring and counselling were higher in states that received additional incentives and monitoring under NNM. Stakeholders concurred that the improvements in coverage were likely driven by NNM., Interpretation: Focused policy attention and programmatic efforts improved coverage and reduced inequities indicating an inclusive approach. Persistent coverage gaps for certain interventions require further inquiry., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.)

Purpose: To determine proportion of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with retinal fluid and central subfield thickness (CST) fluctuations and evaluate their impact on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes treated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) versus monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections., Design: Post hoc analyses of phase 3 Archway trial (NCT03677934)., Participants: Adults with nAMD responsive to anti-VEGF therapy., Intervention: Four hundred eighteen patients randomized 3:2 to the PDS (100 mg/mL) with refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (Q24W) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) for 96 weeks., Outcomes: Proportion of eyes in each treatment arm with subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid (SRF/IRF) overall and in central 1 mm; BCVA changes from baseline by treatment arm and fluid presence/location; proportion of eyes with CST fluctuations from baseline to week 48, week 48 to 96, and baseline to week 96; effects of CST fluctuations on BCVA., Results: Four hundred fifteen eyes were assessed. In the PDS versus monthly ranibizumab arm, proportion of eyes with SRF/IRF, central SRF, and central IRF were 47.6% versus 50.9%, 29.0% versus 19.2%, and 11.7% versus 12.6% at baseline, and 57.8% versus 56.1%, 21.6% versus 14.8%, and 7.0% versus 8.4% at week 96, respectively. BCVA changes from baseline to week 96 were -1.1 letters with the PDS versus -1.4 with monthly ranibizumab in eyes with SRF/IRF, and -1.9 versus -1.8 in eyes with central SRF. In eyes with central IRF, BCVA changes from baseline to week 96 were -2.1 with the PDS versus -6.9 with monthly ranibizumab, respectively (mean BCVA at 96 weeks 68.9 [20/40] vs. 64.6 [20/50]). CST fluctuations occurred in 32.1% and 29.7% of PDS versus monthly ranibizumab eyes; corresponding BCVA changes from baseline to week 96 were -2.5 versus -2.6 (mean BCVA at 96 weeks 72.7 [20/35] vs. 71.5 [20/38])., Conclusions: Port Delivery System with ranibizumab Q24W maintained BCVA to 96 weeks regardless of SRF/IRF, central SRF, central IRF, or CST fluctuations, comparable with monthly ranibizumab, thus supporting the use of the PDS in stabilizing retinal anatomy without the need for monthly treatment in patients with nAMD., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Improvement of water and sanitation conditions may reduce infant mortality, particularly in countries like India where open defecation is highly prevalent. We conducted a quasi-experimental study to investigate the association between the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM)-a national sanitation program initiated in 2014-and infant (IMR) and under five mortality rates (U5MR) in India. We analyzed data from thirty-five Indian states and 640 districts spanning 10 years (2011-2020), with IMR and U5MR per thousand live births as the outcomes. Our main exposure was the district-level annual percentage of households that received a constructed toilet under SBM. We mapped changes in IMR and U5MR and toilet access at the district level over time. We fit two-way fixed effects regression models controlling for sociodemographic, wealth, and healthcare-related confounders at the district-level to estimate the association between toilets constructed and child mortality. Toilet access and child mortality have a historically robust inverse association in India. Toilets constructed increased dramatically across India following the implementation of SBM in 2014. Results from panel data regression models show that districts with > 30% toilets constructed under SBM corresponds with 5.3 lower IMR (p < 0.05), and 6.8 lower U5MR (p < 0.05). Placebo, falsification tests and robustness checks support our main findings. The post-SBM period in India exhibited accelerated reductions in infant and child mortality compared to the pre-SBM years. Based on our regression estimates, the provision of toilets at-scale may have contributed to averting approximately 60,000-70,000 infant deaths annually. Our findings show that the implementation of transformative sanitation programs can deliver population health benefits in low- and middle-income countries., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is often the only source of tumor tissue from patients with advanced, inoperable lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA aspirates are used for the diagnosis, staging, and genomic testing to inform therapy options. Here we extracted DNA and RNA from 220 EBUS-TBNA aspirates to evaluate their suitability for whole genome (WGS), whole exome (WES), and comprehensive panel sequencing. For a subset of 40 cases, the same nucleic acid extraction was sequenced using WGS, WES, and the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Genomic features were compared between sequencing platforms and compared with those reported by clinical testing. A total of 204 aspirates (92.7%) had sufficient DNA (100 ng) for comprehensive panel sequencing, and 109 aspirates (49.5%) had sufficient material for WGS. Comprehensive sequencing platforms detected all seven clinically reported tier 1 actionable mutations, an additional three (7%) tier 1 mutations, six (15%) tier 2-3 mutations, and biomarkers of potential immunotherapy benefit (tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability). As expected, WGS was more suited for the detection and discovery of emerging novel biomarkers of treatment response. WGS could be performed in half of all EBUS-TBNA aspirates, which points to the enormous potential of EBUS-TBNA as source material for large, well-curated discovery-based studies for novel and more effective predictors of treatment response. Comprehensive panel sequencing is possible in the vast majority of fresh EBUS-TBNA aspirates and enhances the detection of actionable mutations over current clinical testing.

Purpose: To evaluate for the presence, severity, and type of exudation at each study visit for a subgroup of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration from the Archway and Portal trials., Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained data., Methods: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans from each study visit of 44 patients from the Port Delivery System (PDS) arm and 32 patients from the monthly injection arm of Archway were evaluated, and composites of horizontal scans through the fovea were created. Each composite was graded for the presence, type, and severity of exudation and impact on best-corrected visual acuity., Results: After PDS implantation, 20 of 44 eyes (45%) never showed any exudation in the fovea, 2 (5%) never showed exudation in the fovea but had several missed visits, whereas 15 (34%), 3 (7%), and 4 (9%) showed mild, moderate, or severe exudation at 1 or more study visits, respectively. When exudation was present, it was most commonly subretinal fluid (50%). Of 32 patients randomized to monthly injections, 15 (47%) had no exudation in the fovea during monthly injections or after PDS implantation. Fluctuation of exudation in the fovea over time was seen in some patients after PDS implantation or during monthly injections with little or no identifiable impact on best-corrected visual acuity. In the 7 eyes with moderate or severe exudation in the fovea after PDS implantation, final vision was good in 5 (20/25 in 3, 20/40 in 1, and 20/50 in 1) and 2 had reduced vision from submacular hemorrhage., Conclusions: The PDS provides excellent control of exudation in the fovea in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, and when exudation occurs, it often resolves without a negative impact on vision., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Determine prevalence, progression rates, and associations of newly detectable macular atrophy (MA) in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with/without ranibizumab treatment., Design: Post hoc analysis of MA in patients with occult/minimally classic nAMD who received monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg) or sham injections for 24 months (M) in MARINA, a phase III trial in treatment-naive patients (NCT00056836)., Participants: Seven hundred six patients with nAMD: ranibizumab 0.3 mg, n = 236; 0.5 mg, n = 237; sham, n = 233., Methods: Macular atrophy, assessed by color fundus photographs/fluorescein angiography, was classified as "within," "adjacent," or "nonadjacent" to the original CNV lesion. Factors associated with MA were assessed by multivariate logistic regression., Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence/incidence of newly detectable MA over time, association with CNV area, MA progression rate, association of MA with visual acuity (VA), changes in CNV/leakage area, and factors predictive of new MA at 24M., Results: At 24M, new MA was detected in 36.8%, 40.4%, and 21.0% of eyes for ranibizumab 0.3 mg, 0.5 mg, and sham, respectively, most frequently within the area of the baseline CNV lesion (93.2%, 85.0%, and 69.0%). Rate of MA progression was similar across arms (∼ 0.3 to 0.4 mm/year). There was strong association between absence of fibrosis and detectable MA (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-5.56), whereas an association was not identified between detectable MA and baseline VA, baseline fellow eye atrophy, ranibizumab treatment, or change in leakage/CNV area at 24M. Ranibizumab-treated eyes gained VA with (0.3 mg: 5.3 letters [95% CI, -3.3, 13.8]; 0.5 mg: 9.8 [4.7-15.0]) or without new MA (0.3 mg: 6.4 [4.1-8.6]; 0.5 mg: 8.0 [5.3-10.6]), whereas VA in sham-treated eyes deteriorated with/without new MA (-14.7 [-23.6, -5.8] and -14.0 [-16.9, -11.1], respectively)., Conclusions: New MA was more frequently detected in ranibizumab-treated than sham-treated eyes. Macular atrophy progression was similar across arms. Multivariate analysis showed that absence of fibrosis was the only variable associated with increased MA. Regardless of MA presence/location at baseline or throughout the study, ranibizumab-treated eyes showed clinically significant improvements in VA, whereas VA in sham-treated eyes worsened., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report 2-year results from the Archway clinical trial of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Design: Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-comparator-controlled trial., Participants: Patients with previously treated nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening and responsive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy., Methods: Patients were randomized 3:2 to PDS with ranibizumab 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W) or intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections every 4 weeks (monthly ranibizumab). Patients were followed through 4 complete refill-exchange intervals (∼2 years)., Main Outcome Measures: Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score from baseline averaged over weeks 44 and 48, weeks 60 and 64, and weeks 88 and 92 (noninferiority margin, -3.9 ETDRS letters)., Results: The PDS Q24W was noninferior to monthly ranibizumab, with differences in adjusted mean change in BCVA score from baseline averaged over weeks 44/48, 60/64 and 88/92 of -0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.8 to +1.3), +0.4 (95% CI, -1.4 to +2.1) and -0.6 ETDRS letters (95% CI, -2.5 to +1.3), respectively. Anatomic outcomes were generally comparable between arms through week 96. Through each of 4 PDS refill-exchange intervals, 98.4%, 94.6%, 94.8%, and 94.7% of PDS Q24W patients assessed did not receive supplemental ranibizumab treatment. The PDS ocular safety profile was generally unchanged from primary analysis. Prespecified ocular adverse events of special interest (AESI) were reported in 59 (23.8%) PDS and 17 (10.2%) monthly ranibizumab patients. The most common AESI reported in both arms was cataract (PDS Q24W, 22 [8.9%]; monthly ranibizumab, 10 [6.0%]). Events in the PDS Q24W arm included (patient incidence) 10 (4.0%) conjunctival erosions, 6 (2.4%) conjunctival retractions, 4 (1.6%) endophthalmitis cases, and 4 (1.6%) implant dislocations. Serum ranibizumab sampling showed that the PDS continuously released ranibizumab over the 24-week refill-exchange interval and ranibizumab serum concentrations were within the range experienced with monthly ranibizumab., Conclusions: The PDS Q24W showed noninferior efficacy to monthly ranibizumab through approximately 2 years, with approximately 95% of PDS Q24W patients not receiving supplemental ranibizumab treatment in each refill-exchange interval. The AESIs were generally manageable, with learnings continually implemented to minimize PDS-related AEs., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To use multimodal assessment (fluorescein angiography [FA], color fundus photography [CFP], and spectral-domain-OCT [SD-OCT]) to reevaluate macular atrophy (MA) and macular neovascularization (MNV) type in the HARBOR trial according to the consensus on neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) Nomenclature criteria; and to determine if there are any associations between baseline demographic factors, ocular characteristics, and treatment for nAMD and the development of MA by month 24., Design: Post hoc analysis of the phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, controlled HARBOR trial (NCT00891735)., Subjects: Nine-hundred and twenty-two study eyes and 919 fellow eyes from the HARBOR trial., Methods: This post hoc analysis included patients with multimodal assessments on FA, CFP, and SD-OCT at baseline. A risk analysis for the development of MA was performed by multimodal assessment and SD-OCT on study eyes without MA at baseline that had completed SD-OCT assessments for MA at month 24., Main Outcome Measures: Development of MA in study eyes at month 24 and a risk analysis for developing MA at month 24 in study eyes that had no MA at baseline, as assessed by multimodal assessment., Results: Of 1097 patients in the HARBOR trial with nAMD and active subfoveal MNV, a total of 922 study eyes and 919 fellow eyes were included in the multimodal analysis of MNV. Macular atrophy assessment was performed on SD-OCT. Of these, 593 had no baseline MA and were included in the risk analysis for developing MA. In eyes with no detectable MA at baseline, a larger proportion of eyes with any MNV type 3 (including mixed type) at baseline developed new MA at month 24 (49.2%) than eyes with MNV type 1 (26.5%), type 2 (29.1%), or mixed type 1 and 2 (34.6%). Macular neovascularization type 3 and fellow eye MA were identified as risk factors for new MA development at month 24., Conclusions: Macular neovascularization type 3 was a strong risk factor for new MA development at month 24, with fellow eye MA also being identified as a predictor. No other variables, including ranibizumab treatment, were identified as risk factors for new MA development., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between retinal fluid location, amount/severity, and vision with ranibizumab-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Methods: In the phase 3 HARBOR trial (NCT00891735), treatment-naive patients with nAMD received ranibizumab 0.5 or 2.0 mg through month 24. This post hoc analysis included eyes with subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or intraretinal fluid (IRF) at screening, baseline, or week 1, and optical coherence tomography data at months 12 and 24 (n = 917). Outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline and proportion of eyes with 20/40 or better vision at months 12 and 24. Eyes were stratified by the location, amount, and/or severity of fluid., Results: At baseline, 86% and 63% of eyes had SRF and IRF, respectively. Among eyes with residual SRF, mean BCVA gains at each time point were greater in eyes with central versus noncentral SRF; location did not affect the odds of having 20/40 or better vision over 24 months. Eyes with 20/40 or better BCVA at month 12 had significantly lower SRF thickness versus eyes with worse vision; however, no difference was apparent at month 24. Vision was comparatively worse in eyes with residual IRF at months 12 and 24; location and severity did not appear to affect this outcome., Conclusion: Residual IRF was associated with worse vision outcomes, regardless of location/severity, whereas, despite continued treatment, residual SRF was not associated with worse vision outcome at 24 months, regardless of location/thickness. These data suggest complex relationships between residual fluid, severity, and vision., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To provide strategies for the management of key ocular adverse events (AEs) that may be encountered with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) in practice and provide recommendations that may mitigate such AEs based on clinical trial experiences and considerations from experts in the field., Design: Safety evaluation based on the phase 2 Ladder (NCT02510794) and phase 3 Archway (NCT03677934) trials of the PDS., Methods: The PDS implant is a permanent, indwelling, and refillable ocular drug delivery system that requires standardized procedural steps for its insertion and refill-exchange procedures, which evolved during the PDS clinical program. We described identified AEs that may arise after implant insertion or refill-exchange procedures, including conjunctival retraction, conjunctival erosion, endophthalmitis, implant dislocation, conjunctival blebs or conjunctival filtering bleb leaks, wound leaks, hypotony, choroidal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, cataract, and septum dislodgement., Results: Adverse events related to the PDS were well understood, were manageable by trial investigators, and did not prevent patients from achieving optimal outcomes in most cases., Conclusions: Surgeons using the PDS should be aware of potential ocular AEs and identify them early for optimal management. As with any new surgical procedure, it is important to provide surgeons with appropriate training, ensure adherence to optimal surgical techniques, and continually refine the procedure to mitigate complications and improve outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Ladder was a phase 2 trial that evaluated the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Serum and aqueous humor samples were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab delivered through the PDS., Methods: Ladder was a multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n = 220) were randomized (3:3:3:2) to PDS 10 mg/ml, PDS 40 mg/ml, PDS 100 mg/ml, or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg. Serum PK samples were collected in all arms and analyzed for ranibizumab concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The main PK analyses were conducted in the PK-evaluable population (n = 68), which excluded patients who received fellow eye intravitreal treatment, supplemental ranibizumab treatment, or had previous treatment with bevacizumab in either eye within 9 months of randomization., Results: In the PDS 10 mg/ml arm, median serum ranibizumab concentrations were below the serum trough concentration (C trough ; 130 pg/ml) expected with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg at all time points. In the PDS 40 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml arms, median serum ranibizumab concentrations were above the C trough expected with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg (130 pg/ml) through month 3 and month 12 after implantation, respectively, and remained above the lower limit of quantification through month 15 and month 16 after implantation, respectively., Conclusions: These PK data indicate that the implant in the PDS 100 mg/ml arm maintained ranibizumab concentrations within the range of monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg injections (130-2220 pg/ml) through month 12 after implantation., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02510794., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To determine whether the rates of macular atrophy (MA) differ between eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated continuously with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) and those treated with ranibizumab given as a bolus intravitreal injection., Design: A preplanned exploratory analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled, dose-ranging study., Participants: Patients diagnosed with nAMD within 9 months of screening who had received at least 2 previous intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections of any agent and were responsive to the treatment., Methods: Eyes were randomized (3:3:3:2) to treatment with either the PDS (filled with a customized formulation of ranibizumab at 10, 40, or 100 mg/ml and refilled pro re nata) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections., Main Outcome Measures: The prevalence, incidence, and progression of MA., Results: The analysis population consisted of 220 eyes (58, 62, 59, and 41 eyes in the PDS 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, 100-mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injection arms, respectively). At study baseline, MA was observed in 14.5% (PDS 10-mg/ml), 11.5% (PDS 40-mg/ml), 13.6% (PDS 100-mg/ml), and 7.6% (monthly ranibizumab) of eyes. At the last assessment (mean, 22.1 months), the prevalence of MA had increased to 38.6% (PDS 10-mg/ml), 40.0% (PDS 40-mg/ml), 40.4% (PDS 100-mg/ml), and 45.7% (monthly ranibizumab). In patients without MA at baseline, a higher proportion of eyes in the monthly ranibizumab arm (40.6%) developed MA than in those in the PDS arms (28.6%, 32.1%, and 30.6% of eyes in the PDS 10-, 40-, and 100-mg/ml arms, respectively). The mean change in the area of MA from baseline to the last assessment for the PDS 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, 100-mg/ml, and monthly ranibizumab arms was +2.46, +1.61, +1.09, and +1.15 mm 2 , respectively. At 9 months, for patients without MA at baseline, the difference in the incidence of MA between the PDS 100-mg/ml and monthly ranibizumab groups was -12% (95% confidence interval, -31% to 7%)., Conclusions: In the phase 2 Ladder trial, there was no evidence of worse MA with the PDS compared with that with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections. Larger trials focusing on MA are needed to confirm this finding., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine whether anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) can be used to obtain noninvasive high-resolution images for monitoring the implantation site of a port delivery system with ranibizumab (PDS). Methods: Six eyes from the Archway phase 3 trial were imaged with AS-OCT after surgical implantation of the PDS and at regular follow-up visits. Results: AS-OCT was helpful in monitoring the status of the overlying conjunctiva and Tenon capsule after implantation of the PDS. Minimal qualitative thinning was observed over the implants at the longest follow-up. No cases of conjunctival erosion were noted. Conclusions: AS-OCT can be used to help to monitor PDS implants and potential associated complications., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Importance: The port delivery system (PDS) with ranibizumab has demonstrated noninferior and equivalent efficacy compared with monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but evaluating patient preference is important to help inform clinical decision-making., Objective: Evaluate treatment satisfaction for ranibizumab delivered via PDS vs intravitreal injections as well as patient preference among those assigned to PDS., Design, Setting, and Participants: Archway was a phase 3 randomized active-comparator open-label clinical trial conducted at 78 sites in the US. Patients 50 years and older with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening with a documented response to anti-VEGF therapy were included. Of 619 patients screened, 418 were enrolled; 415 were included in the primary analysis and 234 were included in the secondary exploratory analysis. The Archway study ran from September 12, 2019, through primary readout on May 22, 2020., Interventions: Patients were randomized 3:2 to PDS with ranibizumab, 100 mg/mL, with fixed refill exchanges every 24 weeks or intravitreal ranibizumab injections, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment satisfaction was measured using the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in the PDS and intravitreal injection arms at week 40. Patient preference was assessed using the content-validated PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPPQ), which measured the proportion of patients in the PDS arm with monthly monitoring who preferred treatment with the PDS at week 40 over previous intravitreal injections or concurrent fellow-eye injections. Both outcomes were exploratory end points., Results: The mean (SD) age of participants at baseline was 75.0 (7.9) years; 234 participants (59%) were women and 162 (41%) were men. At week 40, differences in overall treatment satisfaction scores were minimal for the PDS and intravitreal injection arms (mean, 68.0; 95% CI, 67.4-68.6; n = 237 and mean, 66.1; 95% CI, 64.9-67.3; n = 159, respectively; difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.7-3.1). A total of 234 of 248 patients (94.4%) in the PDS arm were included in the PPPQ analysis. At week 40, almost all patients in the PDS arm preferred treatment via PDS (218 of 234 [93.2%]) vs previous intravitreal injections (3 of 234 [1.3%]), including 172 of 234 (73.5%) with a very strong preference for the PDS. In patients who received concurrent fellow-eye injections (n = 78), 72 (92.3%) preferred the PDS., Conclusions and Relevance: Although PDS treatment was preferred by almost all patients assigned to PDS over previous intravitreal injections, both delivery methods have high treatment satisfaction. These findings provide further evidence for the PDS as a meaningful alternative treatment option for patients with nAMD., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03677934.

Purpose: To characterize relationships between Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature (CONAN) Study Group classifications of macular neovascularization (MNV) and visual responses to ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 HARBOR trial of ranibizumab in nAMD. Analyses included ranibizumab-treated eyes with baseline multimodal imaging data; baseline MNV; subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid at screening, baseline, or week 1; and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images through month 24 (n = 700). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time and mean BCVA change at months 12 and 24 were compared between eyes with type 1, type 2/mixed type 1 and 2 (type 2/M), and any type 3 MNV at baseline., Results: At baseline, 263 (37.6%), 287 (41.0%), and 150 (21.4%) eyes had type 1, type 2/M, and any type 3 lesions, respectively. Type 1 eyes had the best mean BCVA at baseline (59.0 [95% CI: 57.7-60.3] letters) and month 24 (67.7 [65.8-69.6] letters), whereas type 2/M eyes had the worst (50.0 [48.6-51.4] letters and 60.8 [58.7-62.9] letters, respectively). Mean BCVA gains at month 24 were most pronounced for type 2/M eyes (10.8 [8.9-12.7] letters) and similar for type 1 (8.7 [6.9-10.5] letters) and any type 3 eyes (8.3 [6.3-10.3] letters)., Conclusion: Differences in BCVA outcomes between CONAN lesion type subgroups support the use of an anatomic classification system to characterize MNV and prognosticate visual responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for nAMD., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00891735. Date of registration: April 29, 2009., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To evaluate correlations between variability in central foveal thickness (CFT) and vision with ranibizumab in a HARBOR post hoc analysis., Methods and Analysis: Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD; N=1097) received monthly or as-needed (PRN) ranibizumab (0.5 or 2.0 mg) for 24 months. Fluctuation scores were used to assess CFT variability; every time CFT increased and then decreased (or vice versa), numeric value of the change was added to the score. Magnitude of change <50 µm was considered clinically insignificant and did not count towards the score. Fluctuation scores were grouped into quartiles. Least squares mean (LSM) changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were plotted against fluctuation score quartiles for CFT, subretinal fluid (SRF) height, neurosensory retina and neurosensory retina + subretinal hyper-reflective material., Results: Patients with lower fluctuations scores (quartiles 1-3) had greatest vision gains at month 24, with LSM changes from baseline of 9.0-10.8 and 8.7-10.6 letters in the monthly and PRN arms, respectively. Corresponding changes for quartile 4 were 6.7 and 6.5 letters, respectively. There were no differences between quartiles for association between fluctuations in SRF height and BCVA gains. There were inverse correlations between magnitude of fluctuations in neurosensory and inner retina thickness and BCVA gains for quartile 4 vs quartiles 1-3. Patients in quartiles 1 and 2 showed rapid, robust BCVA gains, whereas those in quartiles 3 and 4 had lesser responses., Conclusions: Fluctuations in retinal thickening with ranibizumab may be associated with treatment response in patients with nAMD., Trial Registration Number: NCT00891735., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s): VS: consultant for Genentech, Inc.; MD'R, SG and SB: employees of Genentech, Inc., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between retinal fluid and vision in ranibizumab-treated patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Design: Clinical cohort study using post hoc analysis of clinical trial data., Methods: We assessed data from HARBOR (NCT00891735), a phase III, randomized, controlled trial. We reviewed 917 patients ≥50 years of age with subfoveal nAMD associated with subretinal (SRF) and/or intraretinal fluid (IRF) at baseline, screening, or week 1. The intervention was intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 or 2.0 mg (all treatment arms pooled). Outcomes included mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and BCVA change from baseline at months (M) 12 and 24 evaluated by the presence/absence of SRF and/or IRF., Results: Baseline BCVA was higher with residual vs resolved SRF at M12 (mean [95% confidence interval {CI}] 58.8 letters [57.2-60.4] vs 53.5 [52.4-54.5]) and M24 (59.3 letters [57.8-60.8] vs 53.5 [52.5-54.5]). Mean BCVA change (adjusted for baseline) to M12 was greater with residual vs resolved SRF (mean difference [95% CI], +2.4 letters [+0.1 to +4.7]), but lower with residual vs resolved IRF (-3.5 letters [-5.8 to -1.2]). Eyes with residual SRF (no IRF) exhibited the largest mean BCVA gains (M12, +14.1 letters; M24, +13.2 letters), followed by resolved SRF/IRF (M12, +10.6 letters; M24, +10.0 letters), residual SRF/IRF (M12, +7.2 letters; M24, +8.5 letters), and residual IRF only (M12, +5.5 letters; M24, +3.6 letters)., Conclusions: Vision outcomes (adjusted for baseline BCVA) through M24 were better in ranibizumab-treated eyes with residual vs resolved SRF, and worse with residual vs resolved IRF. Presence of residual retinal fluid requires a more complex and nuanced assessment and interpretation in the context of nAMD management., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report the end-of-study results from the Ladder clinical trial of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Design: Multicenter, randomized, active treatment-controlled phase 2 clinical trial., Participants: Patients diagnosed with nAMD with a documented response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment who received study treatment (N = 220)., Methods: Patients were randomized 3:3:3:2 to treatment with the PDS filled with ranibizumab 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, and 100-mg/ml formulations or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections., Main Outcome Measures: End-of-study results for the time to first meeting refill criteria (first refill), mean change from baseline for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT), and safety., Results: At study end, the mean time on study was 22.1 months (range, 10.8-37.6 months) for all PDS patients. Median time to first refill was 8.7 months, 13.0 months, and 15.8 months, and 28.9%, 56.0%, and 59.4% of patients went 12 months or longer without meeting refill criteria in the PDS 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, and 100-mg/ml treatment arms, respectively. At month 22, the observed mean BCVA change from baseline was ‒4.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, ‒2.3 ETDRS letters, +2.9 ETDRS letters, and +2.7 ETDRS letters in the PDS 10-mg/ml, 40-mg/ml, 100-mg/ml, and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg treatment arms, respectively. At month 22, the observed mean CFT change from baseline was similar in the PDS 100-mg/ml and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg treatment arms. No new safety signals were detected during the additional follow-up., Conclusions: Over a mean of 22 months on study, vision and anatomic outcomes were comparable between the PDS 100-mg/ml and monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg arms, with a lower total number of ranibizumab treatments with the PDS. The Ladder end-of-study findings were consistent with the primary analysis, and the PDS generally was well tolerated throughout the entire study period. The PDS has the potential to reduce treatment burden in patients with nAMD while maintaining vision., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between detection of activity of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and spectral-domain (SD) OCT in the HARBOR study. Most retina specialists rely on OCT to guide treatment decisions in neovascular AMD. However, OCT may not always detect exudative activity. Traditionally, FFA was frequently performed in clinical practice, but its use has diminished due to reliance on OCT., Design: Retrospective post hoc analysis of prospective clinical trial (HARBOR; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00891735)., Participants: Patients with neovascular AMD in the HARBOR Trial., Methods: Baseline to month 24 data from all randomized study eyes in HARBOR with both FFA and SD OCT data were analyzed for (1) evidence of CNV activity on SD OCT (presence of subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, and/or cystoid spaces); (2) evidence of CNV activity on FFA identified by the presence of leakage, and (3) cross-tabulation of CNV activity identified by FFA and SD OCT by office visit., Main Outcome Measures: The percent agreement between FFA and SD OCT in detecting CNV activity and sensitivity and specificity of SD OCT to detect fluorescein leakage in neovascular AMD using FFA as the reference standard., Results: At baseline, 1094 patients (99.9%) had agreement between SD OCT and FFA in detecting CNV activity. By month 24, of the 779 total active cases, the agreement was only 36% (277 cases). By month 24, most cases (n = 452 [58%]) had evidence of CNV activity on SD OCT only, whereas 6% of cases (n = 50) had CNV activity identified by FFA only. At screening and months 3, 6, 12, and 24, 92% to 100% of cases identified by FFA only were occult CNV lesions. Using FFA as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of SD OCT in detecting CNV activity was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84%-99%) and 13% (95% CI, 4%-22%)., Conclusions: Spectral-domain OCT alone can be relied upon for detecting CNV activity while monitoring eyes with neovascular AMD. However, FFA may still be of value in those with occult lesions that appear quiescent on SD OCT, as this type of lesion may show leakage on FFA., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To identify baseline risk factors for macular atrophy (MA) development in HARBOR via a longitudinal assessment of monthly spectral-domain (SD)-OCT scans. Previous analyses of MA in HARBOR examined data from color fundus photography (CFP) and fluorescein angiography (FA)., Design: Retrospective, post hoc analysis of SD-OCT images from HARBOR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00891735), a phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled clinical trial., Participants: Patients (N = 1097) with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly (n = 275), 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) after 3 loading doses (n = 275), 2.0 mg monthly (n = 274), or 2.0 mg PRN (n = 273)., Methods: Evaluable SD-OCT macular cube scans from patients with 24 months of follow-up (N = 941) were examined monthly from baseline to month 24 by masked reading center-trained graders. Atrophy diagnosis criteria were consistent with those proposed by the Classification of Atrophy Meetings (CAM) group: hypertransmission of light into the choroid, loss of retinal pigment epithelium, and loss of outer retinal layers. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was performed for time to atrophy development., Main Outcome Measures: Risk factors for MA as determined by time to MA development over 24 months of treatment., Results: Baseline risk factors for MA were confirmed from prior analyses that used CFP and FA data: absence of subretinal fluid, presence of intraretinal cysts, presence of Type 3 neovascularization, and presence of atrophy in the fellow eye. This analysis of SD-OCT data identified new baseline risk factors for MA: higher central drusen volume, lower choroidal thickness, presence of nascent atrophy, presence of reticular pseudodrusen, and increased central foveal thickness. Ranibizumab treatment regimen and dose level were not found to be risk factors for MA development., Conclusions: In this analysis of a major nAMD trial using CAM atrophy criteria, new baseline risk factors for MA development were identified using an SD-OCT dataset. Risk factors for MA development identified by prior analyses were confirmed. Monthly treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg was not found to be a risk factor for MA development over 24 months., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Previous studies of macular atrophy (MA) in HARBOR analyzed color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography image data. This study performed a longitudinal assessment of monthly spectral-domain (SD) OCT scans to determine MA prevalence, incidence, and progression in HARBOR., Design: Post hoc analysis of SD OCT images from HARBOR (ClincalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00891735), a phase 3 multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active treatment-controlled clinical trial., Participants: Patients (n = 1097) with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly (n = 275), 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) after 3 loading doses (n = 275), 2.0 mg monthly (n = 274), or 2.0 mg PRN (n = 273)., Methods: Evaluable SD OCT macular cube scans from patients with 24 months of follow-up (N = 941) were examined by masked reading center-trained graders monthly from baseline to month 24. Atrophy diagnosis criteria were consistent with those proposed by the Classification of Atrophy Meetings (CAM) group: hypertransmission of light into the choroid, retinal pigment epithelium loss, and loss of outer retinal layers. Macular atrophy was considered Definite if all 3 criteria were met and Questionable if 2 were met. Study arms were compared for time to MA detection (log-rank test) and enlargement rates (time × arm interaction test)., Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence, incidence, and enlargement rates of MA., Results: At baseline, imbalance in MA rates across ranibizumab arms was evident (0.5 mg monthly, 19.1%; 0.5 mg PRN, 16.1%; 2.0 mg monthly, 10.1%; 2.0 mg PRN, 10.5%). At month 24, new MA development rates in eyes without baseline MA were similar between ranibizumab doses (0.5 mg, 25.9%; 2.0 mg, 25.4%) and treatment regimens (monthly, 26.4%; PRN, 25.0%). No significant differences in enlargement rate of new atrophy area (P = 0.479, square-root transformed) or time to detection of new MA (P = 0.997) were evident among study arms., Conclusions: In this analysis of a major nAMD trial using CAM atrophy criteria, no differences were observed in incidence or progression rates of new MA among study arms, ranibizumab doses, or treatment regimens. Monthly versus PRN treatment did not influence MA incidence or progression., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: To compare early and long-term visual responses to ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema., Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of RIDE (NCT00473382) and RISE (NCT00473330). Vision outcomes over 36 months were compared between limited early gainers (gained ≤ 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters), early 1-line gainers (gained 6 to 9 ETDRS letters), and early 2-or-more-line gainers (gained ≥ 10 ETDRS letters) at Month 3., Results: Among 235 ranibizumab-treated patients, 42.6%, 20.0%, and 37.4% were limited early gainers, early 1-line gainers, and early 2-or-more-line gainers, respectively. At Month 36, 71.3% of limited early gainers achieved 6 to 9 and 10 or more ETDRS letter gains. Mean ETDRS letter scores at Month 36 were comparable between limited early gainers (67.8), early 1-line gainers (73.4), and early 2-or-more-line gainers (71.6)., Conclusion: Clinically meaningful vision outcomes were achieved with long-term ranibizumab treatment, irrespective of early visual acuity response. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:210-218.]., (Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To determine optical coherence tomography signs associated with macular atrophy (MA) in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and pigment epithelial detachments treated with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors., Methods: Optical coherence tomography scans from a subgroup of the pigment epithelial detachment cohort of the HARBOR study were analyzed for MA. Two groups were formed based on MA presence/absence at Month 24. Then, optical coherence tomography scans from each baseline visit were graded with standard reading center grading parameters including ellipsoid zone disruption, intraretinal cysts, subretinal fluid, and MA or nascent MA in the study and fellow eyes., Results: Twenty-eight eyes from 28 patients were included in the analysis. Fourteen eyes had optical coherence tomography-based MA at Month 24 and 14 did not. Macular atrophy at Month 24 was significantly associated with 1) MA/nascent MA at baseline (P = 0.0136), 2) intraretinal cysts at baseline (P = 0.0048), and 3) collapse of pigment epithelial detachments in the study eye (P = 0.0025). Macular atrophy was not associated with ellipsoid zone disruption or subretinal fluid in the study eye at baseline., Conclusion: This study suggests that some optical coherence tomography findings in eyes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were present before the start of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and may predict the development of MA.

Geographic atrophy (GA) is a progressive, advanced form of age-related macular degeneration leading to visual function impairment and irreversible vision loss. Standard clinical tests to evaluate visual function in patients with GA provide poor anatomic-functional correlation, whereas fundus imaging does not assess the visual function deficit. Microperimetry is a psychophysical visual function test that spatially maps retinal sensitivity and allows for identification of correlation of anatomic features with visual function. In this review, we present an overview of mesopic microperimetry for GA, including commercially available microperimetry devices, strategies to capture a mesopic microperimetry test, and strategies to assess and interpret microperimetry data in patients with GA. We demonstrate the importance of microperimetry data for assessing GA progression and for evaluating visual function loss through anatomic-functional correlations. Although valuable, current microperimetry tests require an extensive time commitment from the patient and examiner, and the development of faster, more reproducible and accessible methods is important to enable broader use of microperimetry in both clinical and research settings., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine whether there are baseline characteristics that distinguish patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with coexisting macular nonperfusion (MNP) at baseline and assess these patients' potential to achieve favorable visual acuity (VA), anatomic, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) outcomes over 24 months., Design: Post hoc analysis of RIDE/RISE, 2 phase 3, parallel, randomized, multicenter, double-masked trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00473382; NCT00473330)., Participants: Study eyes with best-corrected VA (BCVA)/fluorescein angiogram (FA) data at baseline., Methods: To measure MNP, the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid was overlaid on FAs of the macula. The MNP area was calculated by estimating the percentage of capillary loss in the central, inner, and outer subfields and converting into disc areas (DAs) using a software algorithm. Summary statistics and P values, respectively, were provided for all outcomes and comparisons of interest., Main Outcome Measures: Baseline characteristics; MNP area, BCVA, and central subfield thickness (CST) at months 12 and 24; and incidence of study eyes with ≥2-step DR improvement at months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24., Results: Baseline MNP was detected in 28.2%, 25.8%, and 26.3% of study eyes in the ranibizumab 0.3 mg (n = 213), ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 225), and sham (n = 228) arms, respectively. At baseline, patients with MNP were younger and had shorter diabetes duration, worse vision, increased CST, and worse DR severity (P values < 0.01 vs. those without MNP). In the ranibizumab 0.3 mg arm, eyes with baseline MNP had lower mean baseline BCVA (53.4 vs. 57.2 ETDRS letters for those without baseline MNP; P = 0.05), but mean BCVA gain at month 24 was comparable (+15.6 vs. +13.4 ETDRS letters, respectively; P = 0.2). Eyes with baseline MNP had increased CST at baseline, but experienced a greater decrease in CST by month 24. The proportion of eyes with ≥2-step DR improvement was greater for eyes with versus without baseline MNP in each ranibizumab arm., Conclusions: Despite having worse vision/increased CST versus those without baseline MNP, eyes with concurrent DME and baseline MNP entering RIDE/RISE experienced robust VA and anatomic improvement with ranibizumab and therefore should not be excluded from therapy., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine how best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was affected by cataract surgery in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who were treated with ranibizumab during the RIDE/RISE phase III trials., Design: Post hoc analysis of data from RIDE and RISE, 2 phase III, parallel, randomized, multicenter, double-masked trials (clinicaltrials.gov identifiers, NCT00473382 and NCT00473330)., Participants: Patients with DME (N = 759) who were randomized 1:1:1 to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg, or sham injections for 24 months., Methods: Patient records in the electronic RIDE/RISE study database were examined for cataract surgeries using the terms "cataract extraction," "cataract removal," "cataract surgery," "lens implant," and "lensectomy." The last study visit immediately before cataract surgery served as the redefined baseline to examine subsequent BCVA changes. The t test was performed to compare times to cataract surgery for the sham and pooled ranibizumab groups., Main Outcome Measures: Mean change in BCVA from redefined baseline to 1, 2, and 3 months (±15 days) after surgery., Results: Among study eyes that underwent cataract surgery, mean BCVA at original study baseline was 54.6 letters in the pooled ranibizumab arms and 56.6 letters in the sham arm (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/80). At the redefined presurgery baseline, mean BCVA was 54.2 letters for the pooled ranibizumab group and 46.6 letters for the sham-treated study eyes. Compared with the redefined baseline, at 1 month after surgery, mean BCVA changes were +10.6 letters for ranibizumab-treated patients and +10.3 letters for sham-treated patients. Compared with the original baseline, at 1 month after surgery, on average, ranibizumab-treated study eyes experienced mean BCVA improvement (+11.3 letters), whereas sham-treated eyes (-0.5 letters) and fellow eyes (+1.8 and +1.7 letters for ranibizumab and sham, respectively) had a mean BCVA similar to the original baseline., Conclusions: In patients undergoing ranibizumab treatment for DME and who had cataract surgery, an average of 2 lines of vision were gained from the last visit before surgery to 1 month after surgery., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To describe the incidence and mortality of invasive infections in Indigenous children admitted to paediatric and general intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia., Design: Retrospective multi-centre cohort study of Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry data., Participants: All children under 16 years of age admitted to an ICU in Australia, 1 January 2002 - 31 December 2013. Indigenous children were defined as those identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander in a mandatory admissions dataset., Main Outcomes: Population-based ICU mortality and admission rates., Results: Invasive infections accounted for 23.0% of non-elective ICU admissions of Indigenous children (726 of 3150), resulting in an admission rate of 47.6 per 100 000 children per year. Staphylococcus aureus was the leading pathogen identified in children with sepsis/septic shock (incidence, 4.42 per 100 000 Indigenous children per year; 0.57 per 100 000 non-Indigenous children per year; incidence rate ratio 7.7; 95% CI, 5.8-10.1; P < 0.001). While crude and risk-adjusted ICU mortality related to invasive infections was not significantly different for Indigenous and non-Indigenous children (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.07; P = 0.12), the estimated population-based age-standardised mortality rate for invasive infections was significantly higher for Indigenous children (2.67 per 100 000 per year v 1.04 per 100 000 per year; crude incidence rate ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.88-3.64; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The ICU admission rate for severe infections was several times higher for Indigenous than for non-Indigenous children, particularly for S. aureus infections. While ICU case fatality rates were similar, the population-based mortality was more than twice as high for Indigenous children. Our study highlights an important area of inequality in health care for Indigenous children in a high income country that needs urgent attention.

Purpose: To analyze the effect of baseline presence and height of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) on visual and anatomic outcomes at 24 months in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with ranibizumab., Design: Post hoc analysis of HARBOR, a 24-month, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active treatment-controlled study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00891735)., Participants: One thousand ninety-seven patients with neovascular AMD., Methods: Intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg monthly or pro re nata (PRN) after 3 monthly loading doses., Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated the effect of presence and height of baseline PED on several outcomes at 24 months, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in PED height, resolution of PED, and number of injections in the PRN arms. Development of macular atrophy at month 24 by presence or absence of PED was evaluated., Results: Five hundred ninety-eight (54.5%) patients showed PED at baseline. In the ranibizumab 0.5-mg PRN group, mean numbers of injections were similar for patients with PED present or absent at baseline (14.0 vs. 12.5). Mean BCVA gains from baseline to 24 months were seen in all treatment groups and were comparable in patients with or without PED at baseline treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly (PED present at baseline, +9.0 letters; PED absent at baseline, +11.3 letters), 0.5 mg PRN (present, +8.4; absent, +7.9), 2.0 mg monthly (present, +7.1; absent, +11.1), or 2.0 mg PRN (present, +7.2; absent, +8.8). When analyzed by baseline PED height, mean BCVA gains were demonstrated and comparable in all treatment groups at 24 months except for patients treated with ranibizumab 2.0 mg monthly in the extra-large group (PEDs ≥352 μm; mean BCVA change, -0.8 letters). At 24 months, 53.2% (0.5 mg monthly), 44.5% (0.5 mg PRN), 70.4% (2.0 mg monthly), and 57.3% (2.0 mg PRN) of patients showed complete resolution of PED., Conclusions: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg given monthly or PRN effectively treated PEDs in patients with neovascular AMD, and significant vision gains resulted regardless of PED status and height at baseline. In this analysis, there was no additional vision benefit with a higher dose of ranibizumab (2.0 mg)., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To explore the visual acuity and anatomic outcomes over 24 months of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who showed a delayed anatomic response after 3 ranibizumab injections in the RIDE and RISE trials., Design: Analysis of data from RIDE and RISE, 2 phase III, parallel, randomized, multicenter, double-masked trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT00473382 and NCT00473330)., Participants: Patients with DME (n = 681) who received monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3-mg injections, ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections, or sham injections., Methods: Patients were separated into 3 groups: delayed responders (ranibizumab-treated patients with ≤10% central foveal thickness [CFT] reduction after 3 injections), immediate responders (ranibizumab-treated patients with >10% CFT reduction after 3 injections), and sham recipients. Central foveal thickness was measured by time-domain optical coherence tomography, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) was measured by the standardized ETDRS severity scale (using fundus photographs)., Main Outcome Measures: Month-24 CFT, BCVA, and DR severity levels., Results: In RIDE and RISE, 9% to 10% of ranibizumab-treated eyes were delayed responders. At month 24, delayed responders had less CFT reduction (median, -102 μm) from baseline compared with immediate responders (median, -274 μm; P < 0.0001). Delayed responders gained a median of 10 letters at 24 months, similar to immediate responders (14 letters; P = 0.15). At month 24, DR improvement among the delayed responders (31% and 22% of patients with ≥2- or ≥3-step DR improvement, respectively) was comparable with that among immediate responders (42% and 17%, respectively; P = 0.21 and P = 0.48, respectively)., Conclusions: With continued treatment, at month 24, patients with DME with delayed anatomic response (≤10% CFT reduction) after 3 ranibizumab injections had visual acuity gains and DR improvement similar to those of patients with DME who had immediate anatomic response., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fetal neoplasms are very rare. Recently we had the opportunity to examine the fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of a fetal intracranial teratoma., Case: The tumor was found in a 30-week-gestation fetus; the mother was 32 years old, gravida 4, para 1. She presented with a rapid increase in abdominal girth over a two-week period. An ultrasound scan showed severe fetal hydrocephalus and a massive intracranial tumor thought to be a teratoma because of variations in echogenicity and spotty calcification. An FNA biopsy was performed under ultrasound guidance. It showed mainly neuroepithelial cells, so a differential diagnosis of malignant neuroepithelial tumor was considered. At autopsy, several other tissue types were found in the tumor, consistent with a teratoma., Conclusion: Advances in diagnosis of fetal anomalies by ultrasound have been associated with an increase in the use of fetal interventions performed in utero. This includes the availability of fetal surgery in some centers. FNA biopsy of fetal lesions does not appear to be well described. Increased experience with this technique is necessary if its full potential is to be realized.