Search

The interferon-[gamma] (IFN[gamma]) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay is used to detect a broad range of HIV-specific ELISPOT responses to peptide pools of overlapping 22mers, 15mers, or 9mers in study volunteers receiving DNA- or adenovirus vector-based HIV vaccines and in HIV-seropositive donors. The results have shown that the validated ELISPOT assay using 15mer peptide pools and the positivity criteria is a sensitive and specific assay for the detection of HIV vaccine-induced cell-mediated immunity.

Anti-HIV-1 T-cell immune responses among 363 unvaccinated adults infected with diverse HIV-1 clades is compared. It is revealed that the response rates to clade B Gag and/or clade B Nef in Botswana, with 95 percent and Cameroon, with 98 percent are similar.

Abstract: Human papillomavirus type 52 is highly prevalent in Asia and Africa and accounts for 2–3% of total cervical cancer burden worldwide. The Roche Molecular Systems HPV Linear Array© (RMS-LA©) uses multiple type (i.e. mixed) probes to detect DNA from HPV 52 infection which limits the assay''s ability to determine HPV 52 status in the presence of HPV 33, 35, or 58 infection. This report presents a simple to use and highly reproducible HPV 52 type-specific quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay based on Taqman© chemistry for detection and quantification of HPV 52 DNA from cervical swab specimens. Mixed probe positive cervical swab specimens collected from rural and urban women in Thailand (n =68) were used to determine assay agreement and differences in HPV 52 DNA viral load across cytological diagnosis. Forty-eight specimens were determined to be HPV 52 positive by RMS-LA© with 94% (n =45) confirmed positive by Taqman© assay (kappa: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.99). Higher median viral load was observed among women with a Pap diagnosis of >=ASCUS vs. normal/inflammation (8510 copies/1000 cell equivalents vs. 279 copies/1000 cell equivalents, p <0.05). Accurate ascertainment of infection status is important in understanding HPV 52''s role in the etiology of cervical cancer as well as for the development of type-specific vaccines. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In 2016, WHO designated Lassa fever a priority disease for epidemic preparedness as part of the WHO Blueprint for Action to Prevent Epidemics. One aspect of preparedness is to promote development of effective medical countermeasures (ie, diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines) against Lassa fever. Diagnostic testing for Lassa fever has important limitations and key advancements are needed to ensure rapid and accurate diagnosis. Additionally, the only treatment available for Lassa fever is ribavirin, but controversy exists regarding its effectiveness. Finally, no licensed vaccines are available for the prevention and control of Lassa fever. Ongoing epidemiological and behavioural studies are also crucial in providing actionable information for medical countermeasure development, use, and effectiveness in preventing and treating Lassa fever. This Personal View provides current research priorities for development of Lassa fever medical countermeasures based on literature published primarily in the last 5 years and consensus opinion of 20 subject matter experts with broad experience in public health or the development of diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines for Lassa fever. These priorities provide an important framework to ensure that Lassa fever medical countermeasures are developed and readily available for use in endemic and at-risk areas by the end of the decade., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KAM, AJM, NMM, JTO, MTO, and AKU declare receiving financial support for the completion of this Personal View from Wellcome (grant number 226538/Z/22/Z), payments were made to the University of Minnesota. ADTB is a member of the Vaccine Research, Development and Manufacturing Committee of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). DME is employed by FIND. RFG declares grants U01AI151812, U19AI135995, R01AI132223, R01AI132244, and U19AI142790, all awarded from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, LEAP4WA awarded by the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, and ESEP1904 and INTU1901, both awarded by CEPI; stocks in and royalties or licenses from Zalgen Labs; ownership of a monoclonal antibody patent (WO2018106712A1); and travel support from Wellcome to attend the workshop identified in this Personal View. SG declares financial support for this Personal View from WHO and Wellcome; the receipt of drugs for clinical trials from Toyama–Fujifilm; grants (all payments were made to SG's institutions) from the German Research Foundation (grants GU 883/4-2, GU 883/5-1, and GU 883/7-1), the European Commission (project 101103204—INTEGRATE), the German Government, Ministry of Health (projects ZMI1-2521WHO002 and ZMII2-2523GHP006), CEPI (framework agreement for implementing partner services); the Kirmser Foundation (donation of equipment); speaker honoraria for continuing medical education on viral haemorrhagic fevers; and support for attending meetings from WHO, Wellcome, and CEPI, including travel support from Wellcome to attend the workshop identified in this Personal View. LTM declares being a science consultant at FIND, for which she receives grants, contracts, and consulting fees; and travel support from Wellcome to attend the workshop identified in this Personal View. SAO declares a consulting contract with CEPI (payments made to SAO); is a member of the INTEGRATE consortium with grants from the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (payments made to SAO's institution); and support from CEPI and EDCTP funds (payments made to travel agencies and through SAO's institution). CR declares participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board (this advisory board was designated after CR's participation in the work leading to this Personal View). WKA is Executive Director of the African Vaccine Manufacturing Initiative, and Cheif Executive of National Vaccine Institute, Ghana. DAA, IMA, WKA, ADTB, DGB, EF-C, IdC, DSG, SBG, MJ, KAM, JTO, MTO, AKU, and CSS declare Wellcome supported for travel to attend the workshop identified in this Personal View. PCF, PJH, and JPG worked at Wellcome during the time that this Personal View was completed. All other authors declare no competing interests. No authors were paid by a pharmaceutical company or any other agency to write this Personal View. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this Personal View and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated. Editorial note: The Lancet Group takes a neutral position with respect to territorial claims in published maps and institutional affiliations., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)