Search

SummarySpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a motor-neuron disease caused by loss-of-function mutations of the SMN1 gene. Humans have a paralog, SMN2, whose exon 7 is predominantly skipped, and so it cannot fully compensate for the lack of SMN1. Nusinersen (Spinraza) is a splicing-correcting antisense oligonucleotide drug (ASO) approved for clinical use. Nusinersen targets a splicing silencer located in SMN2 intron 7 pre-mRNA and, by blocking the binding of the splicing repressors hnRNPA1 and A2, it promotes higher E7 inclusion, increasing SMN protein levels. We show here that, by promoting transcriptional elongation, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors cooperate with a nusinersen-like ASO to upregulate E7 inclusion. Surprisingly, the ASO also elicits the deployment of the silencing histone mark H3K9me2 on the SMN2 gene, creating a roadblock to RNA polymerase II elongation that acts negatively on E7 inclusion. By removing the roadblock, HDAC inhibition counteracts the undesired chromatin effects of the ASO, resulting in higher E7 inclusion. Combined systemic administration of the nusinersen-like ASO and HDAC inhibitors in neonate SMA mice had strong synergistic effects on SMN expression, growth, survival, and neuromuscular function. Thus, we suggest that HDAC inhibitors have the potential to increase the clinical efficacy of nusinersen, and perhaps other splicing-modulatory ASO drugs, without large pleiotropic effects, as assessed by genome-wide analyses.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor-neuron disease caused by mutations of the SMN1 gene. The human paralog SMN2, whose exon 7 (E7) is predominantly skipped, cannot compensate for the lack of SMN1. Nusinersen is an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) that upregulates E7 inclusion and SMN protein levels by displacing the splicing repressors hnRNPA1/A2 from their target site in intron 7. We show that by promoting transcriptional elongation, the histone deacetylase inhibitor VPA cooperates with a nusinersen-like ASO to promote E7 inclusion. Surprisingly, the ASO promotes the deployment of the silencing histone mark H3K9me2 on the SMN2 gene, creating a roadblock to RNA polymerase II elongation that inhibits E7 inclusion. By removing the roadblock, VPA counteracts the chromatin effects of the ASO, resulting in higher E7 inclusion without large pleiotropic effects. Combined administration of the nusinersen-like ASO and VPA in SMA mice strongly synergizes SMN expression, growth, survival, and neuromuscular function.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a motor-neuron disease caused by mutations of the SMN1 gene. The human paralog SMN2, whose exon 7 (E7) is predominantly skipped cannot compensate for the lack of SMN1. Nusinersen is an antisense oligonucleotide that upregulates E7 inclusion and SMN protein levels by displacing the splicing repressors hnRNPA1/A2 from their target site in intron 7. We show that, by promoting transcriptional elongation, the histone deacetylase inhibitor VPA cooperates with nusinersen to promote E7 inclusion. Surprisingly, nusinersen promotes the deployment of the silencing histone mark H3K9me2 on the SMN2 gene, creating a roadblock to PolII elongation that inhibits E7 inclusion. By removing the roadblock, VPA counteracts the undesired chromatin effects of nusinersen, resulting in higher E7 inclusion, without large pleiotropic effects, as assessed by genome-wide analyses. Combined administration of nusinersen and VPA in SMA mice strongly synergized in SMN expression, growth, survival, and neuromuscular function.

SUMMARYMammalian chromatin is the site of both RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription and coupled RNA processing. However, molecular details of such co-transcriptional mechanisms remain obscure, partly due to technical limitations in purifying authentic nascent transcripts. We present a new approach to purify and profile nascent RNA, called Polymerase Intact Nascent Transcript (POINT) technology. This three-pronged methodology maps nascent RNA 5’ends (POINT-5), establishes the kinetics of co-transcriptional splicing patterns (POINT-nano) and profiles whole transcription units (POINT-seq). In particular we show by depletion of the nuclear exonuclease Xrn2 that this activity acts selectively on cleaved 5’P-RNA at polyadenylation sites. Furthermore POINT-nano reveals that splicing occurs either immediately after splice site transcription or is delayed until Pol II transcribes downstream sequences. Finally, we connect RNA cleavage and splicing with either premature or full-length transcript termination. We anticipate that POINT technology will afford full dissection of the complexity of co-transcriptional RNA processing.HIGHLIGHTSPOINT methodology dissects intact nascent RNA processingSpecificity of Xrn2 exonuclease in co-transcriptional RNA degradationSplicing suppresses Xrn2-dependent premature terminationDifferent kinetic classes of co-transcriptional splicing in human genes

Removal of introns from pre‐mRNA precursors (pre‐mRNA splicing) is a necessary step for the expression of most genes in multicellular organisms, and alternative patterns of intron removal diversify and regulate the output of genomic information. Mutation or natural variation in pre‐mRNA sequences, as well as in spliceosomal components and regulatory factors, has been implicated in the etiology and progression of numerous pathologies. These range from monogenic to multifactorial genetic diseases, including metabolic syndromes, muscular dystrophies, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. Understanding the molecular mechanisms associated with splicing‐related pathologies can provide key insights into the normal function and physiological context of the complex splicing machinery and establish sound basis for novel therapeutic approaches.

Regulation cinetique de l’epissage alternatif des pre-ARN messagers : attention au ralentissement Gwendal Dujardin1, Alberto R. Kornblihtt2, Laurent Corcos3 1 Centre for Genomic Regulation, carrer Doctor Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain ; 2 Laboratorio de Fisiologia y Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Fisiologia, Biologia Molecular y Celular, IFIBYNE-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellon 2, C1428EHA Buenos Aires, Argentine ; 3 Inserm U1078 equipe ECLA, Faculte de medecine, 22, avenue Camille Desmoulins, 29238 Brest Cedex 3, France. gwendal.dujardin@crg.eu ark@fbmc.fcen.uba.ar laurent.corcos@inserm.fr > Chez les eucaryotes, l’epissage alternatif est un mecanisme finement regule qui permet d’accroitre la complexite du proteome a partir d’un nombre limite de genes. En effet, le nombre de genes chez les vertebres n’est pas drastiquement different de celui qui est retrouve chez les invertebres (23 000 genes chez l’homme, 19 000 chez le ver C. elegans). La frequence de l’epissage alternatif augmentant des eucaryotes unicellulaires aux eucaryotes multicellulaires, celui-ci joue donc un role primordial dans la complexite des organismes. Chez les mammiferes, l’epissage alternatif affecte presque 95 % des genes [1]. La raison principale qui fait que l’epissage puisse etre alternatif est la force des sites bornant les exons en 5’ et en 3’, dictee par leur similitude a la sequence consensus, qui va determiner leur affinite pour des facteurs d’epissage et leur utilisation par la machinerie d’epissage. On parle alors de sites forts et de sites faibles et, en regle generale, lorsqu’un site d’epissage est fort, l’epissage est constitutif. La position relative de sites forts ou faibles va entrainer differents types d’epissage alternatif : inclusion/ exclusion d’exon, exclusion mutuelle d’exons, site d’epissage alternatif en 3’ ou en 5’ ou retention d’intron (les promoteurs multiples et les sites multiples de polyadenylation n’etant pas des evenements d’epissage alternatif au sens strict). L’utilisation d’un site faible d’epissage est influencee a la fois par des elements de regulation en cis et des facteurs trans qui se lient aux sequences cis-regulatrices, activatrices ou inhibitrices de l’epissage. Cependant, le taux d’inclusion d’un exon ne depend pas seulement de la force de ses sites d’epissage, de la presence de sequences cis-regulatrices ou de la concentration, ou des modifications du cancer, la fondation nationale danoise de recherche (DNRF82), le conseil medical de recherche, la fondation Novo Nordisk et le FP7 Marie Curie actions ITN nucleosome4D. La recherche dans le laboratoire de Juri Rappsilber est soutenue par le Wellcome Trust (084229, 077707, 092076, 091020). C.A a beneficie de bourses post doctorales EMBO, HFSP, du conseil medical de recherche danois et de l’ERC2011StG.

Posttranscriptional gene regulation is governed by a network of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that interact with regulatory elements in the mRNA to modulate multiple molecular processes, including splicing, RNA transport, RNA stability, and translation. Mounting evidence indicates that there is a hierarchy within this network whereby certain RBPs cross-regulate other RBPs to coordinate gene expression. HuR, an RNA-binding protein we linked previously to aberrant VEGF mRNA metabolism in models of SOD1-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has been identified as being high up in this hierarchy, serving as a regulator of RNA regulators. Here we investigated the role of HuR in regulating two RBPs, TDP-43 and FUS/TLS, that have been linked genetically to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We found that HuR promotes the expression of both RBPs in primary astrocytes and U251 cells under normal and stressed (hypoxic) conditions. For TDP-43, we found that HuR binds to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) and regulates its expression through translational efficiency rather than RNA stability. With HuR knockdown, there was a shift of TDP-43 and FUS mRNAs away from polysomes, consistent with translational silencing. The TDP-43 splicing function was attenuated upon HuR knockdown and could be rescued by ectopic TDP-43 lacking the 3′ UTR regulatory elements. Finally, conditioned medium from astrocytes in which HuR or TDP-43 was knocked down produced significant motor neuron and cortical neuron toxicity in vitro. These findings indicate that HuR regulates TDP-43 and FUS/TLS expression and that loss of HuR-mediated RNA processing in astrocytes can alter the molecular and cellular landscape to produce a toxic phenotype.

Splicing is functionally coupled to transcription, linking the rate of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) elongation and the ability of splicing factors to recognize splice sites (ss) of various strengths. In most cases, slow Pol II elongation allows weak splice sites to be recognized, leading to higher inclusion of alternative exons. Using CFTR alternative exon 9 (E9) as a model, we show here that slowing down elongation can also cause exon skipping by promoting the recruitment of the negative factor ETR-3 onto the UG-repeat at E9 3′ splice site, which displaces the constitutive splicing factor U2AF65 from the overlapping polypyrimidine tract. Weakening of E9 5′ ss increases ETR-3 binding at the 3′ ss and subsequent E9 skipping, whereas strengthening of the 5′ ss usage has the opposite effect. This indicates that a delay in the cotranscriptional emergence of the 5′ ss promotes ETR-3 recruitment and subsequent inhibition of E9 inclusion. Fil: Dujardin, Gwendal. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Lafaille, Celina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: de la Mata, Manuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Marasco, Luciano Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Muñoz, Manuel Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Le Jossic Corcos, Catherine. Inserm; Francia Fil: Corcos, Laurent. Inserm; Francia Fil: Kornblihtt, Alberto Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina

Pre-mRNA splicing is an obligatory step required to assemble the vast majority of mRNAs in eukaryotes. In humans, each gene gives rise to at least two transcripts, with an average 6-8 spliced transcripts per gene. Pre-mRNA splicing is not unequivocal. Variations may occur, such that splicing can become alternative, thereby participating in increasing protein variability and restricting the gap that exists between the relatively low number of genes - between 20,000 and 25,000 in humans - and the much higher number of distinct proteins - at least 100,000. In addition, although alternative pre-mRNA splicing often fulfils cell-specific needs, many aberrant splicing events can happen and lead to either hereditary or acquired diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases or cancers. In those cases, alternative splicing events may serve as disease-associated markers, or even as targets for corrective approaches. In this review, we will summarize the main aspects of regulated alternative splicing. We will present the spliceosome, a large ribonucleoprotein complex that orchestrates the splicing reactions and that was recently identified as a preferential target for mutations in several pathologies. We shall discuss some spliceosome-associated defects linked to either cis (i.e on the DNA) or trans (e.g. in proteins) alterations of splicing machinery, like those that have been reported in genetic or acquired diseases.

Alternative splicing has emerged as a key contributor to proteome diversity, highlighting the importance of understanding its regulation. In recent years it became apparent that splicing is predominantly cotranscriptional, allowing for crosstalk between these two nuclear processes. We discuss some of the links between transcription and splicing, with special emphasis on the role played by transcription elongation in the regulation of alternative splicing events and in particular the kinetic model of alternative splicing regulation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA polymerase II Transcript Elongation. Fil: Dujardin, Gwendal. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Lafaille, Celina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Petrillo, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Buggiano, Valeria Carmen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Gómez Acuña, Luciana Inés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Fiszbein, Ana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Godoy Herz, Micaela Amalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Nieto Moreno, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Muñoz, Manuel Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Alló, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Schor, Ignacio Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina Fil: Kornblihtt, Alberto Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular. Laboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular; Argentina

Background Cystic fibrosis is caused by mutations of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator gene (CFTR). Among the 1795 reported mutations, 221 (12.31%) are believed to affect pre-mRNA splicing. Nevertheless, not all splicing mutations have been demonstrated, by functional assays, to affect splicing in living cells. Methods We have used a minigene-based approach, coupled to site-specific mutagenesis, to analyze the effects of presumptive pre-mRNA splicing mutations. Results We show here that the intron 11 1811+1G>C and the intron 12 1898+3A>G mutations strongly affected CFTR pre-mRNA splicing. The encoded proteins are predicted to be defective, which would thus participate in the disease phenotype of carrier individuals. Conclusions These results further validate the minigene strategy for the study of presumptive splice mutations, and report unanticipated defects in splicing. Such assays should improve the analysis of genotype–phenotype correlations.

Cystic fibrosis is a prominent genetic disease caused by mutations of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Among the many disease-causing alterations are pre-mRNA splicing defects that can hamper mandatory exon inclusion. CFTR exon 9 splicing depends in part on a polymorphic UG(m)U(n) sequence at the end of intron 8, which can be bound by TDP-43, leading to partial exon 9 skipping. CELF proteins, like CUG-BP1 and ETR-3, can also bind UG repeats and regulate splicing. We show here that ETR-3, but not CUG-BP1, strongly stimulates exon 9 skipping, although both proteins bind efficiently to the same RNA motif as TDP-43 and with higher affinity. We further show that the skipping of this exon may be due to the functional antagonism between U2AF65 and ETR-3 binding onto the polymorphic U or UG stretch, respectively. Importantly, we demonstrate that the divergent domain of ETR-3 is critical for CFTR exon 9 skipping, as shown by deletion and domain-swapping experiments. We propose a model whereby several RNA-binding events account for the complex regulation of CFTR exon 9 inclusion, with strikingly distinct activities of ETR-3 and CUG-BP1, related to the structure of their divergent domain.

Posttranscriptional gene regulation is governed by a network of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that interact with regulatory elements in the mRNA to modulate multiple molecular processes, including splicing, RNA transport, RNA stability, and translation. Mounting evidence indicates that there is a hierarchy within this network whereby certain RBPs cross-regulate other RBPs to coordinate gene expression. HuR, an RNA-binding protein we linked previously to aberrant VEGF mRNA metabolism in models of SOD1-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has been identified as being high up in this hierarchy, serving as a regulator of RNA regulators. Here we investigated the role of HuR in regulating two RBPs, TDP-43 and FUS/TLS, that have been linked genetically to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We found that HuR promotes the expression of both RBPs in primary astrocytes and U251 cells under normal and stressed (hypoxic) conditions. For TDP-43, we found that HuR binds to the 3' untranslated region (UTR) and regulates its expression through translational efficiency rather than RNA stability. With HuR knockdown, there was a shift of TDP-43 and FUS mRNAs away from polysomes, consistent with translational silencing. The TDP-43 splicing function was attenuated upon HuR knockdown and could be rescued by ectopic TDP-43 lacking the 3' UTR regulatory elements. Finally, conditioned medium from astrocytes in which HuR or TDP-43 was knocked down produced significant motor neuron and cortical neuron toxicity in vitro. These findings indicate that HuR regulates TDP-43 and FUS/TLS expression and that loss of HuR-mediated RNA processing in astrocytes can alter the molecular and cellular landscape to produce a toxic phenotype.

Alternative splicing was discovered simultaneously with splicing over three decades ago. Since then, an enormous body of evidence has demonstrated the prevalence of alternative splicing in multicellular eukaryotes, its key roles in determining tissue- and species-specific differentiation patterns, the multiple post- and co-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that control it, and its causal role in hereditary disease and cancer. The emerging evidence places alternative splicing in a central position in the flow of eukaryotic genetic information, between transcription and translation, in that it can respond not only to various signalling pathways that target the splicing machinery but also to transcription factors and chromatin structure. Fil: Kornblihtt, Alberto Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Schor, Ignacio Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Alló, Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Dujardin, Gwendal. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Petrillo, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Muñoz, Manuel Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina

We have recently found that a common synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), c.1275A>G, in exon 9 of the glycoprotein 2 (GP2) gene was significantly underrepresented in French idiopathic chronic pancreatitis patients 20 years old or younger at disease onset than in the control population. To further investigate to this preliminary genetic finding, we characterized the functionality of c.1275A>G in the context of a minigene system. Bioinformatics analysis predicted that c.1275A>G could lead to disruption/generation of exonic splicing enhancer hexamers within exon 9 of the GP2 gene. Minigene analysis revealed that both the wild-type and mutant sequences expressed a full-length transcript and a short transcript lacking exon 9. Quantitation of the relative amount of the two transcripts indicated that the fraction of the full-length transcript derived from c.1275A>G is much lower than that derived from the wild-type (51.9% vs 77.4%). Extinction of two splicing factors (SF2/ASF and SC35) by RNA interference also affected c.1275A>G more seriously than the wild-type in terms of exon 9 skipping. Exon 9 skipping was presumed to cause a loss of GP2 function. This study represents the first detailed analysis of any variation in the GP2 gene and gives some support to the putative association of c.1275A>G with disease protection.

Pre-mRNA splicing is functionally coupled to transcription, and genotoxic stresses can enhance alternative exon inclusion by affecting elongating RNA polymerase II. We report here that various genotoxic stress inducers, including camptothecin (CPT), inhibit the interaction between Ewing's sarcoma proto-oncoprotein (EWS), an RNA polymerase II-associated factor, and YB-1, a spliceosome-associated factor. This results in the cotranscriptional skipping of several exons of the MDM2 gene, which encodes the main p53 ubiquitin ligase. This reversible exon skipping participates in the regulation of MDM2 expression that may contribute to the accumulation of p53 during stress exposure and its rapid shut-off when stress is removed. Finally, a splicing-sensitive microarray identified numerous exons that are skipped in response to CPT and EWS-YB-1 depletion. These data demonstrate genotoxic stress-induced alteration of the communication between the transcriptional and splicing machineries, which results in widespread exon skipping and plays a central role in the genotoxic stress response.

Background The B-cell activating factor (BAFF) is a potent survival factor involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Recently, we reported the discovery of a new transcript for BAFF, ∆4BAFF – lacking exon 4 –, which is mainly detected in autoimmune diseases and acts as a transcription factor for its own gene. However, the mechanisms implicated in ∆4BAFF induction and up-regulation are unknown. In this study we analysed the induction and regulation of ∆4BAFF. Materials and Methods First, to study the alternative splicing of BAFF exon 4, we transfected a minigene construct, centred on exon 4, into RAMOS B cells. To determine the proteins implicated in exon 4 inclusion/exclusion, we co-transfected the minigene together with each of the plasmids coding for the main splicing proteins (SC35, SRp40, SRp55, SRp20 and hnRNPA1), and the ratios between exon4 inclusion/exclusion were evaluated by RT-PCR. Second, we examined the effects of different cytokines on ∆4BAFF induction. Results RAMOS cells presented exon 4 skipping (ratio inclusion/exclusion: 6.8) after minigene transfection. Following co-transfection of the minigene with coding plasmids for splicing proteins, only the overexpression of SC35 showed effect in the splicing of exon 4, promoting exon 4 inclusion (ratio: >30). Incubation of different cell lines with several cytokines showed that IFN-γ was able to induce ∆4BAFF-transcript. Thus, after IFN-γ stimulation in the minigene model, the ratio inclusion/exclusion markedly decreased (1.5). IFN-γ modifies the balance between SC35 and another member of hnRNPs family (hnRNP C1/C2) favouring the alternative splicing of exon 4. Conclusions These results demonstrated that IFN-γ induces ∆4BAFF, modifying the function of SC35 protein and increasing the hnRNPC1/C2. Our study provides an expanded conceptual view of BAFF gene regulation, and contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in BAFF up-regulation in autoimmunity.

Multicellular organisms must ensure genome integrity to prevent accumulation of mutations, cell death, and cancer. The DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex network that senses, signals, and executes multiple programs including DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis. This entails regulation of a variety of cellular processes: DNA replication and transcription, RNA processing, mRNA translation and turnover, and post-translational modification, degradation, and relocalization of proteins. Accumulated evidence over the past decades has shown that RNAs and RNA metabolism are both regulators and regulated actors of the DDR. This review aims to present a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on the many interactions between the DNA damage and RNA fields. Fil: Giono, Luciana Eugenia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Nieto Moreno, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Cambindo Botto, Adrian Edgardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Dujardin, Gwendal. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Muñoz, Manuel Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina Fil: Kornblihtt, Alberto Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias; Argentina