Search

Your search keyword '"Hübscher, Markus"' showing total 331 results
Start Over Author "Hübscher, Markus"
331 results on '"Hübscher, Markus"'

11. Correlates of Perceived Ankle Instability in Healthy Individuals Aged 8 to 101 Years

Author

Baldwin, Jennifer, McKay, Marnee, Chard, Angus, Ferreira, Paulo, Yan, Alycia Fong, Hawke, Fiona, Hiller, Claire, Lee (née Zheng), Fiona, Mackey, Martin, Mousavi, Seyed, Nicholson, Leslie, Nightingale, Elizabeth, Pourkazemi, Fereshteh, Raymond, Jacqueline, Rose, Kristy, Simic, Milena, Sman, Amy, Wegener, Caleb, Refshauge, Kathryn M., Burns, Joshua, Moloney, Niamh, Hübscher, Markus, Vanicek, Natalie, Quinlan, Kate, North, Kathryn, Baldwin, Jennifer N., McKay, Marnee J., Hiller, Claire E., and Nightingale, Elizabeth J.

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. 1000 Norms Project: protocol of a cross-sectional study cataloging human variation

Author

McKay, Marnee J., Baldwin, Jennifer N., Ferreira, Paulo, Simic, Milena, Vanicek, Natalie, Hiller, Claire E., Nightingale, Elizabeth J., Moloney, Niamh A., Quinlan, Kate G., Pourkazemi, Fereshteh, Sman, Amy D., Nicholson, Leslie L., Mousavi, Seyed J., Rose, Kristy, Raymond, Jacqueline, Mackey, Martin G., Chard, Angus, Hübscher, Markus, Wegener, Caleb, Fong Yan, Alycia, Refshauge, Kathryn M., and Burns, Joshua

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Evaluation Issues in Autonomic Computing

Author

McCann, Julie A., Huebscher, Markus C., Hutchison, David, editor, Kanade, Takeo, editor, Kittler, Josef, editor, Kleinberg, Jon M., editor, Mattern, Friedemann, editor, Mitchell, John C., editor, Naor, Moni, editor, Nierstrasz, Oscar, editor, Pandu Rangan, C., editor, Steffen, Bernhard, editor, Sudan, Madhu, editor, Terzopoulos, Demetri, editor, Tygar, Dough, editor, Vardi, Moshe Y., editor, Weikum, Gerhard, editor, Jin, Hai, editor, Pan, Yi, editor, Xiao, Nong, editor, and Sun, Jianhua, editor

Published
2004
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. RESOLVE Trial_Statistical Analysis Plan_Pre-registration

Author

Bagg, Matthew, Lo, Serigne, Cashin, Aidan, Herbert, Rob, O'Connell, Neil, Lee, Hopin, Hübscher, Markus, Wand, Benedict, O'Hagan, Edel, Rizzo, Rodrigo, Moseley, G., Stanton, Tasha, Maher, Christopher, Goodall, Stephen, Saing, Sopany, Zahara, Pauline, and McAuley, James

Subjects
equipment and supplies, human activities, health care economics and organizations
Abstract

Pre-print of statistical analysis plan for the RESOLVE trial for people with chronic low back pain

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Does data from trial registries influence effect size in meta-analyses?

Author

Bagg, Matthew, O'Hagan, Edel, Wand, Benedict, Hübscher, Markus, Moseley, G., and McAuley, James

Subjects
equipment and supplies, human activities, health care economics and organizations
Abstract

Sensitivity analysis of recent meta-analyses of pharmacological interventions for pain in people with low back pain

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. The RESOLVE Trial

Author

Bagg, Matthew, Hübscher, Markus, Rabey, Martin, Wand, Benedict, O'Hagan, Edel, Moseley, G., Stanton, Tasha, Maher, Chris, Goodall, Stephen, Saing, Sopany, O'Connell, Neil, Luomajoki, Hannu, and McAuley, James

Subjects
health services administration, population characteristics, equipment and supplies, human activities, health care economics and organizations
Abstract

A randomised clinical trial for chronic low back pain

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Protocol

Author

Cashin, Aidan, Lee, Hopin, Traeger, Adrian, Hübscher, Markus, Skinner, Ian, and McAuley, James

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Effect of Graded Sensorimotor Retraining on Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Author

Bagg, Matthew K., primary, Wand, Benedict M., additional, Cashin, Aidan G., additional, Lee, Hopin, additional, Hübscher, Markus, additional, Stanton, Tasha R., additional, O’Connell, Neil E., additional, O’Hagan, Edel T., additional, Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N., additional, Wewege, Michael A., additional, Rabey, Martin, additional, Goodall, Stephen, additional, Saing, Sopany, additional, Lo, Serigne N., additional, Luomajoki, Hannu, additional, Herbert, Robert D., additional, Maher, Chris G., additional, Moseley, G. Lorimer, additional, and McAuley, James H., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. Effect of graded sensorimotor retraining on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain : a randomized clinical trial

Author

Bagg, Matthew K., Wand, Benedict M., Cashin, Aidan G., Lee, Hopin, Hübscher, Markus, Stanton, Tasha R., O'Connell, Neil E., O'Hagan, Edel T., Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N., Wewege, Michael A., Rabey, Martin, Goodall, Stephen, Saing, Sopany, Lo, Serigne N., Luomajoki, Hannu, Herbert, Robert D., Maher, Chris G., Moseley, G. Lorimer, McAuley, James H., Bagg, Matthew K., Wand, Benedict M., Cashin, Aidan G., Lee, Hopin, Hübscher, Markus, Stanton, Tasha R., O'Connell, Neil E., O'Hagan, Edel T., Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N., Wewege, Michael A., Rabey, Martin, Goodall, Stephen, Saing, Sopany, Lo, Serigne N., Luomajoki, Hannu, Herbert, Robert D., Maher, Chris G., Moseley, G. Lorimer, and McAuley, James H.

Abstract

Importance: The effects of altered neural processing, defined as altering neural networks responsible for perceptions of pain and function, on chronic pain remains unclear. Objective:To estimate the effect of a graded sensorimotor retraining intervention (RESOLVE) on pain intensity in people with chronic low back pain. Design, setting and participants: This parallel, 2-group, randomized clinical trial recruited participants with chronic (>3 months) nonspecific low back pain from primary care and community settings. A total of 276 adults were randomized (in a 1:1 ratio) to the intervention or sham procedure and attention control groups delivered by clinicians at a medical research institute in Sydney, Australia. The first participant was randomized on December 10, 2015, and the last was randomized on July 25, 2019. Follow-up was completed on February 3, 2020. Interventions: Participants randomized to the intervention group (n = 138) were asked to participate in 12 weekly clinical sessions and home training designed to educate them about and assist them with movement and physical activity while experiencing lower back pain. Participants randomized to the control group (n = 138) were asked to participate in 12 weekly clinical sessions and home training that required similar time as the intervention but did not focus on education, movement, and physical activity. The control group included sham laser and shortwave diathermy applied to the back and sham noninvasive brain stimulation. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity at 18 weeks, measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for which the between-group minimum clinically important difference is 1.0 point. Results: Among 276 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 46 [14.3] years; 138 [50%] women), 261 (95%) completed follow-up at 18 weeks. The mean pain intensity was 5.6 at baseline and 3.1 at 18 weeks in the intervention group and 5.8 at ba

Published
2022

32. Does poor sleep quality lead to increased low back pain the following day?

Author

O'Hagan, Edel T., Cashin, Aidan G., Hübscher, Markus, Mohammad alsaadi, Saad, Gustin, Sylvia, and McAuley, James H.

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between sleep quality and next-day pain intensity for people with low back pain and investigated whether there was any evidence that this relationship was causal. We conducted a secondary analysis of an observational study that investigated sleep quality in people with low back pain. People with low back pain were recruited from primary care and the community. Sleep quality was measured with subjective (self-report) and objective (polysomnography (PSG)) measures. PSG analysis classifies sleep into stages, of which slow-wave sleep (SWS) is thought to have a key role in maintaining or increasing pain intensity. We drew directed acyclic graphs to identify possible confounders of the relationship between both measures of sleep quality, and pain intensity. We constructed two linear regression models to explore the effect of subjective and objective sleep quality on next-day pain intensity before and after confounder adjustment. Thirty-nine participants were included in the study. For participants with low back pain, self-reported better quality sleep β=−0.38 (95% CI −0.63 to −0.13), or spending a greater proportion of time in SWS β=−0.12 (95% CI −0.22 to −0.02) was associated with lower next day pain intensity. After confounder adjustment, the effect reduced and was no longer significant for either self-reported β=−0.18 (95% CI −0.46 to 0.10), or SWS β=−0.08 (95% CI −0.18 to 0.03). Sleep quality, whether measured by self-report or proportion of time in SWS, was associated with next day pain intensity for people with low back pain. However, this relationship is likely to be confounded and therefore not likely to be causal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Contributors

Author

Audette, Joseph F., primary, Bachmann, Jürgen, additional, Banzer, Winfried, additional, Behrens, Nicolas, additional, Dejung, Beat, additional, Dorsher, Peter T., additional, Euler, David, additional, Fleckenstein, Johannes, additional, Gautschi, Roland, additional, Gleditsch, Jochen, additional, Hübscher, Markus, additional, Irnich, Christine, additional, Irnich, Dominik, additional, Kosub, Martin, additional, Lang, Philip, additional, Lewit, Karel, additional, Licht, Gunnar, additional, Maier, Markus, additional, Offenbächer, Martin, additional, Gil, Francisco Pedrosa, additional, Pfab, Florian, additional, Duc, Jean-Marc Pho, additional, Pothmann, Raymund, additional, Schleip, Robert, additional, Schmitt, Hans-Joachim, additional, Shah, Jay P., additional, Slugocki, Armin, additional, Späth, Michael, additional, Spiegl, Kathrin, additional, and Winkelmann, Andreas, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Physical procedures

Author

Schmitt, Hans-Joachim, primary, Pothmann, Raymund, additional, Banzer, Winfried, additional, Hübscher, Markus, additional, Maier, Markus, additional, and Kosub, Martin, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Making exercise count: Considerations for the role of exercise in back pain treatment.

Author

Cashin, Aidan G., Booth, John, McAuley, James H., Jones, Matthew D., Hübscher, Markus, Traeger, Adrian C., Fried, Kal, and Moseley, G. Lorimer

Subjects
LUMBAR pain, THERAPEUTICS, MEDICAL databases, PROFESSIONS, PHYSICAL therapy, EVIDENCE-based medicine, PATIENTS' attitudes, PROFESSIONAL competence, EXERCISE therapy
Abstract

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is pain that has persisted for greater than three months. It is common and burdensome and represents a significant proportion of primary health presentations. For the majority of people with CLBP, a specific nociceptive contributor cannot be reliably identified, and the pain is categorised as 'non‐specific'. Exercise therapy is recommended by international clinical guidelines as a first‐line treatment for non‐specific CLBP. Aim: This comprehensive review aims to synthesise and appraise the current research to provide practical, evidence‐based guidance concerning exercise prescription for non‐specific CLBP. We discuss detailed initial assessment and being informed by patient preferences, values, expectations, competencies and goals. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) using broad search terms from January 2000 to March 2021, to identify the most recent clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on exercise for CLBP. Results/Discussion: Systematic reviews show exercise is effective for small, short‐term reductions in pain and disability, when compared with placebo, usual care, or waiting list control, and serious adverse events are rare. A range of individualised or group‐based exercise modalities have been demonstrated as effective in reducing pain and disability. Despite this consensus, controversies and significant challenges remain. Conclusion: To promote recovery, sustainable outcomes and self‐management, exercise can be coupled with education strategies, as well as interventions that enhance adherence, motivation and patient self‐efficacy. Clinicians might benefit from intentionally considering their own knowledge and competencies, potential harms of exercise and costs to the patient. This comprehensive review provides evidence‐based practical guidance to health professionals who prescribe exercise for people with non‐specific CLBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results