Search

PURPOSE: Many cancer centers engage in multidisciplinary tumor board meetings to determine the optimal approach to complex cancer care. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions changed the format of these meetings from in-person to virtual. The aim of this study was to determine if the change to a virtual meeting format had an impact on attendance and cases presented. METHODS: Tumor board records were analyzed to obtain attendance and case presentation information at a National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Twelve-month in-person tumor board data were compared with 12-month virtual tumor board data to assess for difference in attendance and case presentation patterns. RESULTS: Seven separate weekly tumor board meetings at the beginning of the study (breast, GI, gynecology, liver, lung, melanoma, and urology) were expanded to nine meetings on the virtual platform (+endocrine and pancreas). Overall attendance increased by 46% on the virtual platform compared with in-person meetings (4,030 virtual attendances v 2,753 in-person, P < .001). Increased attendance was present across all specialties on the virtual platform. In addition, the number of patient cases discussed increased from 2,127 in in-person meeting to 2,656 on the virtual platform (a 20% increase, P < .001). CONCLUSION: A significant increase was observed in overall tumor board attendance and in case presentations per meeting, requiring the expansion of additional weekly meetings. Furthermore, in a major cancer center with multiple community affiliates, virtual tumor boards may encourage increased participation from remote sites with the benefit of obtaining expert specialist advice as compared with geographically challenging in-person meetings.

Frequency of PD-L1 expression and the role of immunotherapy in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) have not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine PD-L1 expression in patients with MPM and perform an exploratory analysis for associations between PD-L1 and its biological behavior in MPM.Tumor samples were collected from patients undergoing surgical interventions between January 2018 and June 2020. Specimens were stained with anti-PD-L1 antibodies (Dako 22c3) and positivity was determined by tumor proportion score (TPS) or combined positive score (CPS) being ≥1%.Twenty one samples were obtained from 21 patients. Sixteen of 21 (76%) samples were CPS positive and 9 of 21 (43%) were TPS positive. Three samples had more aggressive biphasic/sarcomatoid histology and a high CPS and TPS (CPS: 3, 75, 95%; TPS: 2, 60, 90%). On an exploratory analysis, as the CPS or TPS threshold increased, there was a trend towards worse survival.MPM has a high frequency of PD-L1 expression, which may be associated with more aggressive tumor biology. These data provide the foundation for continued evaluation of checkpoint inhibition in patients with MPM.

Table S4: List of 201 differentially expressed genes (>1.5 fold) that were significantly associated with survival. Table S5: List of 66 inflammatory genes associated with survival. Table S6: List of 35 inflammatory genes associated with survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Table S7: Univariable and Multivariable Cox-Regression Analysis

Supplementary Figure S1 - PDF file 115K, Gene expression of PNLIP, CLPS, PNLIRP1 and PNLIPRP2 in Panc1, MIApaca2 and non-tumorigenic hTERT-HPNE cell lines

Supplementary Materials and Methods - PDF file 88K, Additional description of materials and methods

Table S3: List of 1820 differentially expressed genes between short and long survival groups

Supplementary Table S2 - PDF file 64K, A list of 55 metabolites differentially expressed in two independent cohorts of PDAC cases

Supplementary methods: Describes additional details of generation of stable NOSTRIN overexpressing cells, western blotting, measurement of Nitric Oxide production, Xcelligence real-time migration assay and Luciferase Reporter Assay; Supplementary figure legends

Figure S1: Representative pictures of immunohistochemical staining, showing NOSTRIN expression largely in the tumor cells in the patient with long survival. Figure S2: NOSTRIN overexpression sensitizes the Panc1 pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine. Figure S3: (a) A negative correlation existed between miR-222 and NOSTRIN expression in tumors from PDAC cases (N=37). (b) miR-222 expression does not show any significant association with survival. (ns=non significant).

Figure S1. Validation of miRNA microarray data by qRT-PCR in the test cohort (n=69). Figure S2. MIF regulates miR-301b expression in human pancreatic cancer Figure S3. NR3C2 is a potential target of miR-301b. Figure S4. Endogenous NR3C2 expression was negatively correlated with MIF and miR-301b in a panel of human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Figure S5. NR3C2 enhances sensitivity to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Figure S6. Knockdown of NR3C2 increases proliferation, migration and invasion, and decreases sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine. Figure S7. A lower endogenous NR3C2 expression was associated with EMT phenotype. Figure S8. NR3C2 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Figure S9. MIF-induced miR-301b expression was blocked by anti-miR-301b. Figure S10. MEK inhibitor AZD6244 didn't alter miR-301b or NR3C2 in MIF-overexpressing Panc-1 and Capan-2 cells. Figure S11. NR3C2 expression is decreased in tumors as compared to adjacent nontumor tissues in PDAC. Figure S12. A lower expression of NR3C2 is associated with poor survival in multiple independent cohorts of PDAC.

Supplementary Materials and Methods and Supplementary Figure Legends

PDF file - 612K, Table S1. Characteristics of patient population. Figure S1. An inverse association between FOXL1 and ZEB1 expressions in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Figure S2. Oncomine analysis on differential expression of FOXL1 in multiple publicly available microarray datasets of pancreatic cancer. Figure S3. The effect of silencing FOXL1 by siRNA on cell growth, apoptosis and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells. Figure S4. The regulation of apoptosis-related gene expression by overexpression of FOXL1 in Panc1 cells.

Table S1. Characteristics of Patients' Population (Test cohort, N=69). Table S2. Characteristics of Patients' Population (Validation Cohort-1, N=41). Table S3. Characteristics of Patients' Population (Validation Cohort-2, N=64). Table S4. Clinicopathologic features of TCGA cohort. Table S5. Characteristics of tissue microarray cohort (Validation cohort-3, N=173) Table S6. Differentially expressed miRNAs in MIF-High and MIF-Low PDAC cases and their association with survival (cox regression). Table S7. miR-301b candidate target gene associated with survival by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Table S8. qRT-PCR probes and primer sequences for plasmid construction. Table S9. Antibodies information

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can provide downstaging and improve margin negativity for borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma [(B)RPC]. Little is known about the relative efficacy of capecitabine (CAPE)-based vs. gemcitabine (GEM)-based 3-week chemoradiation (3WCRT) with 36 Gy in 15 fractions. This study aimed to compare the odds of achieving surgical resection, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with 3WCRT with concurrent CAPE versus GEM. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, examining medical records from a single center for patients with (B)RPC treated with 3WCRT between 1/2009–12/2020. Odd ratios (OR) of achieving surgical resection were estimated using logistic regression for univariable and multivariable analyses. Median TTP (mTTP) and median OS (mOS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of progression and survival in univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-two (71%) patients were treated with CAPE, while 9 (29%) were treated with GEM. All patients in the GEM group were borderline resectable, vs. 18 (82%) patients in the CAPE group, P=0.30. Nineteen (86%) patients in the CAPE group were treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, vs. 4 (44%) patients in the GEM group, P=0.03. The CAPE group had higher odds of achieving surgical resection [OR =9.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50–58.20]. Adjusting for covariates, the odds of achieving surgical resection were still statistically higher in the CAPE group vs. the GEM group (OR =25.34; 95% CI: 1.14–563.72). The CAPE group had superior mTTP compared to the GEM group (15.4 months, 95% CI: 4.9–71.1 vs. 4.0 months, 95% CI: 0.4–14.5; P=0.01), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14–0.81). Adjusting for covariates this effect persisted; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for progression was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08–0.77). Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated that the CAPE group had superior OS compared to the GEM group in unadjusted (HR =0.13; 95% CI: 0.04–0.40) and adjusted models (HR =0.13, 95% CI: 0.03–0.52). CONCLUSIONS: For neoadjuvant 3WCRT, this hypothesis-generating study suggests concurrent CAPE may be a more effective radiosensitizer than GEM for patients with (B)RPC.

The most common malignancies that develop in carriers of BAP1 germline mutations include diffuse malignant mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and less frequently, breast cancer, several types of skin carcinomas, and other tumor types. Mesotheliomas in these patients are significantly less aggressive, and patients require a multidisciplinary approach that involves genetic counseling, medical genetics, pathology, surgical, medical, and radiation oncology expertise. Some BAP1 carriers have asymptomatic mesothelioma that can be followed by close clinical observation without apparent adverse outcomes: they may survive many years without therapy. Others may grow aggressively but very often respond to therapy. Detecting BAP1 germline mutations has, therefore, substantial medical, social, and economic impact. Close monitoring of these patients and their relatives is expected to result in prolonged life expectancy, improved quality of life, and being cost-effective. The co-authors of this paper are those who have published the vast majority of cases of mesothelioma occurring in patients carrying inactivating germline BAP1 mutations and who have studied the families affected by the BAP1 cancer syndrome for many years. This paper reports our experience. It is intended to be a source of information for all physicians who care for patients carrying germline BAP1 mutations. We discuss the clinical presentation, diagnostic and treatment challenges, and our recommendations of how to best care for these patients and their family members, including the potential economic and psychosocial impact. (C) 2022 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

In this study, we aimed to find genes with a key function in the development of molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Through transcriptome analysis, we discovered that the endogenous serine/cysteine proteinase inhibitor SERPINB3 (squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1, SCCA1) was distinctively upregulated in the basal-like/squamous subtype, known as an aggressive subtype, and this upregulation associated with decreased patient survival in both a test (N=123) and a validation cohort (N=84). In additional investigations of the tumor metabolome and transcriptome using PDAC patient tumors and cell lines, SERPINB3 and the basal-like/squamous subtype showed a robust relationship with upregulated levels of amino acids (e.g., hydroxyproline) whereas SERPINB3 promoted a gene signature indicative of the basal-like/squamous subtype. Additional mechanistic studies revealed that SERPINB3 and hydroxyproline promoted the migration/invasion of PDAC cells. Moreover, SERPINB3 also promoted metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of PDAC through stromal factors that increased tumor microvessel density. To conclude, inhibiting SERPINB3 function may attenuate disease progression of the basal-like/squamous subtype in PDAC through changes to the tumor stroma and tumor metabolism. Citation Format: Yuuki Ohara, Wei Tang, Liu Huaitian, Shouhui Yang, Peijun He, Helen Cawley, Paloma Valenzuela, Lin Zhang, Jochen Gaedcke, B. Michael Ghadimi, Matthias M. Gaida, Frank Bergmann, H. Richard Alexander, Nader Hanna, Stefan Ambs, S. Perwez Hussain. SERPINB3 promotes the aggressive basal-like/squamous subtype and correlates with poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through metabolic reprogramming [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6225.

Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for T1/T2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. We compared positive margin rates in patients with clinical T1&T2 tumors who did and did not receive NAT. Methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) found clinical T1&T2 PDAC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2004 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate regression determined factors associated with a positive margin and survival. Results 9795 patients underwent surgery for clinical T1 or T2 pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. 8472 patients had data regarding use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies; of which, 774 (9.1%) received NAT and 435 (5.1%) received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. NAT was found to lower positive margin rates from 21.8 to 15.5% (p, Highlights • Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreas cancer is controversial • Neoadjuvant therapy can improve margin positivity • Margin positivity is associated with inferior survival • Even small, resectable pancreas cancers may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy

The management of patients with diffuse liver metastases remains a significant clinical challenge. In many cancer patients, metastatic disease may be isolated to the liver or the liver may be the dominant site of progressive metastatic cancer. In this setting, progression of disease in the liver generally is the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality.

Background The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for patients with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) is 5.3%. Surgery for mGC is controversial. Methods We identified all mGC patients who received chemotherapy using the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Patients were grouped according to surgery of: (1) the primary site (PS) only, (2) primary and distant sites (PDS), (3) distant site only (DS), or (4) no surgery (NS). A propensity score adjustment and multivariate regression was used to compare OS. Results Overall, 18,772 patients met the inclusion criteria: (1) PS (n = 962, 5.1%), (2) PDS (n = 380, 2.1%), (3) DS (n = 984, 5.2%), and 16,446 NS (87.6%). Surgery was associated with improved OS in the PS and PDS groups (hazard ratios: .489 (95% CI: .376-.636); .583 (95% CI: .420-.811), P < .001) (median OS 15.8 and 15.9 months vs 8.6 for NS patients, respectively). Conclusions Gastrectomy with or without metastasectomy is associated with improved survival in stage IV gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This warrants further prospective studies.

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is often regarded as a less frequent pattern of spread; however, collectively across all spectra of primary tumors, the consequences of PM impact a large population of patients annually. Unlike other modes of metastasis, symptoms at presentation or during the treatment course are common, representing an additional challenge in the management of PM. Early efforts with chemotherapy and incomplete surgical interventions transiently improved symptoms, but durable symptom control and survival extension were rare, which established a perspective of treatment futility for PM through most of the 20th century. Notably, the continued development of better systemic therapy combinations, optimization of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and rigorous investigation of combining regional therapy-specifically hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-with CRS, have resulted in more effective multimodal treatment options for patients with PM. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the data establishing the contemporary approach for tumors with a high frequency of PM, including appendix, colorectal, mesothelioma, and gastric cancers. The authors also explore the emerging role of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to the well established paradigm of CRS and systemic therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, as well as the recent clinical trials identifying the efficacy of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase maintenance therapy. Finally, recent data are included that explore the role of precision medicine technology in PM management that, in the future, may help further improve patient selection, identify the best systemic therapy regimens, detect actionable mutations, and identify new targets for drug development.

Patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) may have increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the association of MS with mortality, serious morbidity, and pancreatectomy-specific outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).Patients with MS who underwent PD were selected from the 2014-2018 ACS-NSQIP pancreatectomy-specific database. MS was defined as obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/mOf 19,054 patients who underwent PD, 7.3% (n = 1388) had MS. On univariable analysis, patients with MS had significantly worse outcomes (p 0.05): 30-day mortality (3% vs 1.8%), serious morbidity (26% vs 23%), re-intubation (4.9% vs 3.5%), pulmonary embolism (2.0% vs 1.1%), acute renal failure (1.5% vs 0.9%), cardiac arrest (1.9% vs 1.0%), and delayed gastric emptying (18% vs 16.5%). On multivariable analysis, 30-day mortality was significantly increased in patients with MS (aOR: 1.53, p 0.01).Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. The association with mortality is a novel observation. Perioperative strategies aimed at reduction and/or mitigation of cardiac, pulmonary, thrombotic, and renal complications should be employed in this population given their increased risk.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy and is refractory to available treatments. Delineating the regulatory mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming, a key event in pancreatic cancer progression, may identify candidate targets with potential therapeutic significance. We hypothesized that inflammatory signaling pathways regulate metabolic adaptations in pancreatic cancer. Metabolic profiling of tumors from PDAC patients with a high‐ (>median, N=31) and low‐NOS2 (inducible nitric oxide synthase) (•(nitric oxide)‐mediated signaling pathway was elucidated. The level of kynurenine, a tryptophan metabolite, was associated with high NOS2 expression, and a higher level of kynurenine predicted poor survival in patients (N=63,P= 0.01). Gene expression analysis in PDAC tumors (N=63) showed a positive correlation between the expression of NOS2 and the tryptophan/kynurenine pathway genes, including indoleamine‐2,3‐dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) and several aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)‐target genes includingNFE2L2(NRF2),SERPINB2, IL1b,IL6andIL8, which are implicated in pancreatic cancer. Consistently, treatment of pancreatic cancer cell lines with NO•donor induced IDO1, kynurenine production, and the expression of AHR‐target genes. Furthermore, kynurenine treatment enhanced spheroid growth and invasive potential of pancreatic cancer cell lines. Mechanistically, NO•‐induced IDO1/Kynurenine/AHR signaling was mediated by RUNX3 transcription factor. Our findings identified a novel NO•/RUNX3/Kynurenine metabolic axis, which enhances disease aggressiveness in pancreatic cancer and may have potential translational significance in improving disease outcome.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of desmoplastic small round cell tumor, breast, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor specifically related to peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for palliative care specifically related to peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of neuroendocrine tumors specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and lethal disease of the peritoneal lining, with high variability in biologic aggressiveness. Morbidity and mortality of the disease are related to progressive locoregional effects within the abdominal cavity, such as distention, pain, early satiety, and decreased oral intake that can ultimately lead to bowel obstruction and cachexia. The standard of care for patients with resectable disease remains cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), with potential survival outcomes greater than 5 years in appropriately selected patients. Patients with inoperable MPM can be offered systemic treatment, although the disease is usually refractory to standard chemotherapic regimens. Patients with MPM should be treated at high volume centers with strong consideration for inclusion in tumor registries and clinical trials. In 2020, research will continue to explore promising genetic and immunologic targets and focus on refinement of surgical methods to optimize CRS-HIPEC approaches.

The introduction of more effective chemotherapy a decade ago has led to increased use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to assess the evolving use of NAT in individuals with PDAC undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and to compare their outcomes with patients undergoing upfront operation.The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Procedure Targeted Pancreatectomy database was queried from 2014 to 2019. Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were evaluated based on the use of NAT versus upfront operation. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the effect of NAT on postoperative outcomes, including the composite measure optimal pancreatic surgery (OPS). Mann-Kendall trend tests were performed to assess the use of NAT and associated outcomes over time.A total of 13,257 patients were identified who underwent PD for PDAC between 2014 and 2019. Overall, 33.6% of patients received NAT. The use of NAT increased steadily from 24.2% in 2014 to 42.7% in 2019 (p0.0001). On multivariable analysis, NAT was associated with reduced serious morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 0.83, p0.001), clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (OR 0.52, p0.001), organ space infections (OR 0.74, p0.001), percutaneous drainage (OR 0.73, p0.001), reoperation (OR 0.76, p = 0.005), and prolonged length of stay (OR 0.63, p0.001). OPS was achieved more frequently in patients undergoing NAT (OR 1.433, p0.001) and improved over time in patients receiving NAT (50.7% to 56.6%, p0.001).NAT before pancreatoduodenectomy increased more than 3-fold over the past decade and was associated with improved optimal operative outcomes.

More complex cases are being performed robotically. This study aims to characterize trends in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) over time and assess opportunities for advanced trainees.Using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2014 to 2019, PD cases were characterized by operative approach (open-OPN, laparoscopic-LAP, robotic-ROB). Proficiency and postoperative outcomes were described by approach over time.24,268 PDs were identified, with the ROB approach increasing from 2.8% to 7.5%. Unplanned conversion increased over time for LAP (27.7-39.0%, p = 0.003) but was unchanged for ROB cases (14.8-14.7%, p = 0.257). Morbidity increased for OPN PD (35.5-36.8%, p = 0.041) and decreased for ROB PD (38.7-30.3%, p = 0.010). Mean LOS was lower in ROB than LAP/OPN (9.5 vs. 10.9 vs. 10.9 days, p 0.00001). Approximately, 100 AHPBA, SSO, and ASTS fellows are being trained each year in North America; however, only about 5 RPDs are available per trainee per year which is far below that recommended to achieve proficiency.Over a 6-year period, a significant increase was observed in the use of RPD without a concomitant increase in conversion rates. RPD was associated with decreased morbidity and length of stay. Despite this shift, the number of cases being performed is not adequate for all fellows to achieve proficiency before graduation.

The management of patients with diffuse liver metastases remains a significant clinical challenge. In many cancer patients, metastatic disease may be isolated to the liver or the liver may be the dominant site of progressive metastatic cancer. In this setting, progression of disease in the liver generally is the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality.

Purpose: According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, T1 staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) is defined as tumor limited to the pancreas, ≤2 cm. The AJCC 8th edition subcategorizes T1 staging into T1a (≤5 mm), T1b (≤1 cm), and T1c (≤2 cm) for PC despite the absence of supporting evidence. We sought to determine whether this new subcategorization has prognostic significance. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing definitive surgery for PC was performed by using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014. Kaplan–Meier survival was computed for the subcategories. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed by using stepwise regression. Results: The NCDB captured 41,552 stages I and II patients who underwent definitive surgery for PC in this 10-year period. A total of 2090 of these patients were pathological T1N0. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with T1a (n = 319), T1b (n = 296), and T1c (n = 1309) PC was 68.8%, 57%, and 46.6%, respectively. This subcategorization lost significance on MVA and when focused on T1N1-2 patients. Recategorizing T stage into T1a (≤1 cm) and T1b (≤2 cm) resulted in statistical significance on MVA. Conclusion: Subcategorization of the T1 stage into T1a, T1b, and T1c in resected PC does differentiate OS in patients with node-negative disease. We support the AJCC 8th edition T1 stage subcategorization, while understanding that it does not differentiate OS on MVA. When this is further subcategorized into T1a (≤1 cm) and T1b (≤2 cm), it predicts OS in resected, node-negative patients on MVA.

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer that is ultimately fatal in almost all afflicted individuals. Morbidity and mortality from MPM is due to its propensity to progress locoregionally within the abdominal cavity. Patients with MPM most commonly present with nonspecific abdominal symptoms that usually lead to diagnosis when the condition is relatively advanced. MPM is considered a chemotherapy-resistant malignancy.

To determine the role of reoperation in patients with persistent or recurrent Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES).Approximately, 0% to 60% of ZES patients are disease-free (DF) after an initial operation, but the tumor may recur.A prospective database was queried.A total of 223 patients had an initial operation for possible cure of ZES and then were subsequently evaluated serially with cross sectional imaging-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, more recently octreoscan-and functional studies for ZES activity. The mean age at first surgery was 49 years and with an 11-year mean follow-up 52 patients (23%) underwent reoperation when ZES recurred with imageable disease. Results in this group are analyzed in the current report. Reoperation occurred on a mean of 6 years after the initial surgery with a mean number of reoperations of 1 (range 1-5). After reoperation 18/52 patients were initially DF (35%); and after a mean follow-up of 8 years, 13/52 remained DF (25%). During follow-up, 9/52 reoperated patients (17%) died, of whom 7 patients died a disease-related death (13%). The overall survival from first surgery was 84% at 20 years and 68% at 30 years. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 status did not affect survival, but DF interval and liver metastases did.These results demonstrate that a significant proportion of patients with ZES will develop resectable persistent or recurrent disease after an initial operation. These patients generally have prolonged survival after reoperation and 25% can be cured with repeat surgery, suggesting all ZES patients postresection should have systematic imaging, and if tumor recurs, advise repeat operation.