Among the greatest challenges facing society is the need to more fully understand the complex ecological processes that maintain our human life support system and to integrate knowledge about these processes into management and policy decisions. As the report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis of Ecosystem Management indicates, the incorporation of good science into management decisions at a landscape to regional level is an essential component of ecosystem management. There is much we do not know about ecosystem functions, primarily because ecological interactions are very complex, and we have only recently begun to ask questions about multiple, interacting components. As ecologists, perhaps imbued with physics envy, we often seek neat, clean answers to specific hypotheses and may be frustrated by the more variable, less predictable results of research on ecosystems. Both of us have worked extensively in the relatively "simple" ecosystems of the Sonoran Desert. The reputation of deserts as hostile, dangerous habitats is unwarranted and obfuscates the real advantage of working in a habitat where the parts are relatively discrete and easy to identify, count, weigh, measure, and manipulate. We both investigated the complex interactions among several desert-adapted taxa (ants, birds, mammals) and the seeds they consumed. The diets and foraging behavior of these granivores were complicated, but, with persistence, could be investigated, modeled, and even predicted. However, our realization that ants not only consume seeds but also disperse them and that rodents and birds not only compete with ants for seeds, but also prey on the insects, pointed out to us that these systems are much more complex than simple consumer/ resource relationships. The asymmetries of mutualism, competition, and concurrent predation muddied the waters that had once appeared clear to us. Ecologists everywhere now encounter similar complications such as third-order interactions, cascading trophic effects, and nonlinear relationships. In addition to being generally complex, ecosystems are often in nonequilibrium states, such that no particular endpoint may be obvious or predictable. Consequently, resources managers seeking a stable outcome for their units may encounter difficulties and frustrations with attempting to apply specific management regimes. This circumstance makes understanding the processes involved a key factor in attempting to comprehend and manage systems. Ecological interactions such as those mentioned above are further complicated by the need to understand relationships on spatial scales that extend beyond the boundaries of individual study plots and temporal scales that extend beyond the life-span of a typical grant or the tenure of a graduate student, and in some cases, beyond the career of individual scientists. Furthermore, we are subject to what sociologists call the "last pioneer syndrome" -each generation accepts the world as it is when they arrive, including the built environment, but is intolerant of any substantial changes during its life-span. Hence, dissatisfaction or disgust with environmental degradation tend not to be cumulative between generations such that long term changes in environmental quality and functioning may go unnoticed or unappreciated. These difficulties notwithstanding, it is clear that we must move forward with attempts to understand the basic ecological processes that drive our biosphere. Ecosystem studies have been conducted for decades, but the momentum for this approach, especially as it pertains to resource management, has recently been building. The burgeoning of talks, meetings, committees, and reports on the topic probably indicates a growing awareness of the need for embedding many ecological questions in the appropriate ecosystem context. The true catalyst, however, may be the recognition that no one research unit (bureau, department, university, etc.) has the resources to accomplish the goals of ecosystem research and management, and that cooperation, collaboration, and efficiencies are in order. The National Biological Service (NBS) was spawned from a realization that biological research within the Department of Interior would benefit from integration. Many studies being conducted by DOI biologists overlapped geographically or topically, but only a few fit together as parts of broader questions. Furthermore, studies were often restricted to specific geographic or political boundaries, precluding analyses at national, regional, or even landscape scales. With its mandate to integrate the previously isolated research components of the Department of Interior and to address regional issues in a holistic fashion, the NBS I Manuscript received 16 November 1995. 2 For reprints of this Forum, see footnote 1, page 692.