Search

Introduction: Preserving the cochlear structures and thus hearing preservation, has become a prominent topic of discussion in cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Various approaches and soft surgical techniques have been described when approaching the inner ear. Robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) reaches the round window in a minimally invasive manner by following a trajectory of minimal trauma. This involves the drilling of a keyhole trajectory to the round window, through the facial recess, with no need for a complete mastoidectomy. It involves less drilling, less drilling time and less structural damage. A lot of attention has been paid to the structural traumatic causes of hearing loss but acoustic trauma during the exposure of the inner ear appears to be neglected topic. Aim: The aim was to measure the noise exposure of the inner ear during the robotic drilling of the mastoid and bony overhang of the round window. The results were compared with the milling in conventional cochlear implantation surgery. Intervention: RACIS on fresh frozen human cadavers. Outcome measurements: The equivalent frequency-weighted and time-averaged sound pressure level LAF in dB and the noise dose in % derived from a noise damage model, both obtained during RACIS. Materials and methods: The robotic drilling of 6 trajectories towards the inner ear were performed, including 4 trajectories through round window access and 2 trajectories through cochleostomy. The results were compared with the data of 7 cases of conventional CI surgery that have been described in literature. The induced equivalent sound pressure level LAF was determined via an accelleration sensor at the zygomatic arch and a calibration according to bone conduction audiometry. A noise dose for the whole procedure was calculated from the equivalent sound pressure level LAF and the exposure time using a noise damage model. A noise dose of 100% is considered a critical exposure limit and values above are considered potentially harmful, with the risk of hearing impairment. Results: The maximum LAF was 82 dB during fiducial screw placement; 87 dB during middle ear access; 95 dB for the accesses through the round window and 88 dB for the accesses through cochleostomy. The noise dose due to the HEARO®-procedure was always far below the critical value of 100%. There was no acoustic trauma of the inner ear in all cases with the noise dose being smaller than 0.1% in five out of the six cases. The maximum LAF in the seven cases of conventional CI surgery was 118 dB with a maximum cumulative noise dose of 172.6%. The critical exposure limit of 100% was exceeded in three cases of conventional CI surgery. Conclusion: RACIS provokes significantly less acoustic trauma than conventional mastoid surgery in our findings. There were no observable differences in noise exposure levels between a cochleostomy or a round window approach where the bony overhang needed to be drilled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The aim of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) is to access the inner ear with minimal trauma. High-resolution imaging, empowered with a highly accurate navigation system can enable the planning of a direct keyhole drilling trajectory toward the inner ear. The time has come to (re)define the ideal trajectory into the inner ear with robot-assisted tools that can drill with the highest accuracy. The trajectories of past RACIS procedures were analysed to gain insight into how to calculate the most ideal trajectory and to determine which trajectory parameters influence the course of the procedure. Data-analysis was performed on three groups of previously performed RACIS-procedures. Group 1 included the RACIS-procedures with a round window (RW) approach. Group 2 included the RACIS-procedures with difficulty entering the inner ear. Group 3 included the converted cases to conventional CI surgery due to inadequate intra-operative safety margins. The RW diameter was significantly smaller and its orientation significantly less favourable in group 2 compared to group 1. A smaller surface size and an unfavourable orientation of the RW in relation to the drilling trajectory are thus associated with a more difficult electrode array insertion in RACIS. Both must be taken into account when planning a drilling trajectory into the inner ear.

Introduction: Robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) as defined by the HEARO®-procedure performs minimal invasive cochlear implant (CI) surgery by directly drilling a keyhole trajectory towards the inner ear. Hitherto, an entirely robotic automation including electrode insertion has not been described yet. The feasability of using a newly developed, dedicated motorised device for automated electrode insertion in the first clinical case of entirely robotic cochlear implant surgery was investigated., Aim: The aim is to report the first experience of entirely robotic cochlear implantation surgery., Intervention: RACIS with a straight flexible lateral wall electrode., Primary Outcome Measurements: Electrode cochlear insertion depth., Secondary Outcome Measurements: The audiological outcome in terms of mean hearing thresholds., Conclusion: Here, we report on a cochlear implant robot that performs the most complex surgical steps to place a cochlear implant array successfully in the inner ear and render similar audiological results as in conventional surgery. Robots can execute tasks beyond human dexterity and will probably pave the way to standardize residual hearing preservation and broadening the indication for electric-acoustic stimulation in the same ear with hybrid implants., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Preserving the cochlear structures and thus hearing preservation, has become a prominent topic of discussion in cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Various approaches and soft surgical techniques have been described when approaching the inner ear. Robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) reaches the round window in a minimally invasive manner by following a trajectory of minimal trauma. This involves the drilling of a keyhole trajectory to the round window, through the facial recess, with no need for a complete mastoidectomy. It involves less drilling, less drilling time and less structural damage. A lot of attention has been paid to the structural traumatic causes of hearing loss but acoustic trauma during the exposure of the inner ear appears to be neglected topic., Aim: The aim was to measure the noise exposure of the inner ear during the robotic drilling of the mastoid and bony overhang of the round window. The results were compared with the milling in conventional cochlear implantation surgery., Intervention: RACIS on fresh frozen human cadavers., Outcome Measurements: The equivalent frequency-weighted and time-averaged sound pressure level L AF in dB and the noise dose in % derived from a noise damage model, both obtained during RACIS., Materials and Methods: The robotic drilling of 6 trajectories towards the inner ear were performed, including 4 trajectories through round window access and 2 trajectories through cochleostomy. The results were compared with the data of 7 cases of conventional CI surgery that have been described in literature. The induced equivalent sound pressure level L AF was determined via an accelleration sensor at the zygomatic arch and a calibration according to bone conduction audiometry. A noise dose for the whole procedure was calculated from the equivalent sound pressure level L AF and the exposure time using a noise damage model. A noise dose of 100% is considered a critical exposure limit and values above are considered potentially harmful, with the risk of hearing impairment., Results: The maximum L AF was 82 dB during fiducial screw placement; 87 dB during middle ear access; 95 dB for the accesses through the round window and 88 dB for the accesses through cochleostomy. The noise dose due to the HEARO ® -procedure was always far below the critical value of 100%. There was no acoustic trauma of the inner ear in all cases with the noise dose being smaller than 0.1% in five out of the six cases. The maximum L AF in the seven cases of conventional CI surgery was 118 dB with a maximum cumulative noise dose of 172.6%. The critical exposure limit of 100% was exceeded in three cases of conventional CI surgery., Conclusion: RACIS provokes significantly less acoustic trauma than conventional mastoid surgery in our findings. There were no observable differences in noise exposure levels between a cochleostomy or a round window approach where the bony overhang needed to be drilled., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)