Search

Your search keyword '"HEBON"' showing total 22 results
Start Over Descriptor "HEBON"
22 results on '"HEBON"'

1. Height and Body Mass Index as Modifiers of Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Author

Qian, Frank, Wang, Shengfeng, Mitchell, Jonathan, McGuffog, Lesley, Barrowdale, Daniel, Leslie, Goska, Oosterwijk, Jan C, Chung, Wendy K, Evans, D Gareth, Engel, Christoph, Kast, Karin, Aalfs, Cora M, Adank, Muriel A, Adlard, Julian, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Arun, Banu K, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Azzollini, Jacopo, Barouk-Simonet, Emmanuelle, Barwell, Julian, Belotti, Muriel, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Borg, Ake, Bradbury, Angela R, Brunet, Joan, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Caputo, Sandrine M, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Claes, Kathleen BM, Margriet Collée, J, Couch, Fergus J, Coupier, Isabelle, Daly, Mary B, Davidson, Rosemarie, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Donaldson, Alan, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Eeles, Ros, Feliubadaló, Lidia, Foretova, Lenka, Fowler, Jeffrey, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Garcia-Barberan, Vanesa, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Gómez Garcia, Encarna B, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Henderson, Alex, Hendricks, Carolyn B, Hopper, John L, Hulick, Peter J, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Izatt, Louise, Izquierdo, Ángel, Jakubowska, Anna, Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Kang, Eunyoung, Karlan, Beth Y, Kets, Carolien M, Kim, Sung-Won, Kim, Zisun, Kwong, Ava, Laitman, Yael, Lasset, Christine, Hyuk Lee, Min, Won Lee, Jong, Lee, Jihyoun, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne, Loud, Jennifer T, Lubinski, Jan, Mebirouk, Noura, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne EJ, Meindl, Alfons, Miller, Austin, Montagna, Marco, Mooij, Thea M, Morrison, Patrick J, Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle, Nathanson, Katherine L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Niederacher, Dieter, Nielsen, Finn C, Nussbaum, Robert L, and Offit, Kenneth

Subjects
GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, EMBRACE, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Body Mass Index, Body Height, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Female, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundBRCA1/2 mutations confer high lifetime risk of breast cancer, although other factors may modify this risk. Whether height or body mass index (BMI) modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers remains unclear.MethodsWe used Mendelian randomization approaches to evaluate the association of height and BMI on breast cancer risk, using data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 with 14 676 BRCA1 and 7912 BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 11 451 cases of breast cancer. We created a height genetic score using 586 height-associated variants and a BMI genetic score using 93 BMI-associated variants. We examined both observed and genetically determined height and BMI with breast cancer risk using weighted Cox models. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsObserved height was positively associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 1.09 per 10 cm increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0 to 1.17; P = 1.17). Height genetic score was positively associated with breast cancer, although this was not statistically significant (per 10 cm increase in genetically predicted height, HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.17; P = .47). Observed BMI was inversely associated with breast cancer risk (per 5 kg/m2 increase, HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.98; P = .007). BMI genetic score was also inversely associated with breast cancer risk (per 5 kg/m2 increase in genetically predicted BMI, HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.98; P = .02). BMI was primarily associated with premenopausal breast cancer.ConclusionHeight is associated with overall breast cancer and BMI is associated with premenopausal breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Incorporating height and BMI, particularly genetic score, into risk assessment may improve cancer management.

Published
2019

2. Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Author

Rebbeck, Timothy R, Friebel, Tara M, Friedman, Eitan, Hamann, Ute, Huo, Dezheng, Kwong, Ava, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Solano, Angela R, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Thomassen, Mads, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Chan, TL, Couch, Fergus J, Goldgar, David E, Kruse, Torben A, Palmero, Edenir Inêz, Park, Sue Kyung, Torres, Diana, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, McGuffog, Lesley, Parsons, Michael T, Leslie, Goska, Aalfs, Cora M, Abugattas, Julio, Adlard, Julian, Agata, Simona, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrews, Lesley, Andrulis, Irene L, Arason, Adalgeir, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Asseryanis, Ella, Auerbach, Leo, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Barile, Monica, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Blanco, Amie M, Blazer, Kathleen R, Blok, Marinus J, Bonadona, Valérie, Bonanni, Bernardo, Bradbury, Angela R, Brewer, Carole, Buecher, Bruno, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caliebe, Almuth, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Caputo, Sandrine M, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Cook, Jackie, Davidson, Rosemarie, de la Hoya, Miguel, De Leeneer, Kim, de Pauw, Antoine, Delnatte, Capucine, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Ditsch, Nina, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Velazquez, Carolina, Dworniczak, Bernd, Eason, Jacqueline, Easton, Douglas F, Eeles, Ros, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Engert, Stefanie, Evans, D Gareth, Faivre, Laurence, Feliubadaló, Lidia, Ferrer, Sandra Fert, Foretova, Lenka, Fowler, Jeffrey, Frost, Debra, Galvão, Henrique CR, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Gauthier-Villars, Marion, Gehrig, Andrea, GEMO Study Collaborators, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Gesta, Paul, Giannini, Giuseppe, Giraud, Sophie, and Glendon, Gord

Subjects
EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, Humans, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Family, Mutation, Geography, Internationality, Databases, Genetic, BRCA1, BRCA2, breast cancer, ethnicity, geography, mutation, ovarian cancer, Databases, Genetic, Genetics & Heredity, Genetics, Clinical Sciences
Abstract

The prevalence and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported in single populations, with the majority of reports focused on White in Europe and North America. The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) has assembled data on 18,435 families with BRCA1 mutations and 11,351 families with BRCA2 mutations ascertained from 69 centers in 49 countries on six continents. This study comprehensively describes the characteristics of the 1,650 unique BRCA1 and 1,731 unique BRCA2 deleterious (disease-associated) mutations identified in the CIMBA database. We observed substantial variation in mutation type and frequency by geographical region and race/ethnicity. In addition to known founder mutations, mutations of relatively high frequency were identified in specific racial/ethnic or geographic groups that may reflect founder mutations and which could be used in targeted (panel) first pass genotyping for specific populations. Knowledge of the population-specific mutational spectrum in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could inform efficient strategies for genetic testing and may justify a more broad-based oncogenetic testing in some populations.

Published
2018

3. Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer

Author

Milne, Roger L, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Beesley, Jonathan, Kar, Siddhartha, Lindström, Sara, Hui, Shirley, Lemaçon, Audrey, Soucy, Penny, Dennis, Joe, Jiang, Xia, Rostamianfar, Asha, Finucane, Hilary, Bolla, Manjeet K, McGuffog, Lesley, Wang, Qin, Aalfs, Cora M, Adams, Marcia, Adlard, Julian, Agata, Simona, Ahmed, Shahana, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Allen, Jamie, Ambrosone, Christine B, Amos, Christopher I, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Aronson, Kristan J, Auber, Bernd, Auer, Paul L, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Azzollini, Jacopo, Bacot, François, Balmaña, Judith, Barile, Monica, Barjhoux, Laure, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrdahl, Myrto, Barnes, Daniel, Barrowdale, Daniel, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Bignon, Yves-Jean, Blazer, Kathleen R, Blok, Marinus J, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bobolis, Kristie, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Bozsik, Aniko, Bradbury, Angela R, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Bressac-de Paillerets, Brigitte, Brewer, Carole, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Byun, Jinyoung, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Canzian, Federico, Caron, Olivier, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, J Esteban, Castera, Laurent, Caux-Moncoutier, Virginie, Chan, Salina B, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Xiaoqing, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Christiansen, Hans, Claes, Kathleen BM, Clarke, Christine L, Conner, Thomas, Conroy, Don M, and Cook, Jackie

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Aging, Estrogen, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, BRCA1 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Heterozygote, Humans, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, White People, ABCTB Investigators, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, NBSC Collaborators, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Agricultural biotechnology, Bioinformatics and computational biology
Abstract

Most common breast cancer susceptibility variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. We conducted a GWAS using 21,468 ER-negative cases and 100,594 controls combined with 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer), all of European origin. We identified independent associations at P < 5 × 10-8 with ten variants at nine new loci. At P < 0.05, we replicated associations with 10 of 11 variants previously reported in ER-negative disease or BRCA1 mutation carrier GWAS and observed consistent associations with ER-negative disease for 105 susceptibility variants identified by other studies. These 125 variants explain approximately 16% of the familial risk of this breast cancer subtype. There was high genetic correlation (0.72) between risk of ER-negative breast cancer and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. These findings may lead to improved risk prediction and inform further fine-mapping and functional work to better understand the biological basis of ER-negative breast cancer.

Published
2017

4. Association of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with genetic variants showing differential allelic expression: identification of a modifier of breast cancer risk at locus 11q22.3.

Author

Hamdi, Yosr, Soucy, Penny, Kuchenbaeker, Karoline B, Pastinen, Tomi, Droit, Arnaud, Lemaçon, Audrey, Adlard, Julian, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L, Arason, Adalgeir, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Azzollini, Jacopo, Bane, Anita, Barjhoux, Laure, Barrowdale, Daniel, Benitez, Javier, Berthet, Pascaline, Blok, Marinus J, Bobolis, Kristie, Bonadona, Valérie, Bonanni, Bernardo, Bradbury, Angela R, Brewer, Carole, Buecher, Bruno, Buys, Saundra S, Caligo, Maria A, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Daly, Mary B, Damiola, Francesca, Davidson, Rosemarie, De la Hoya, Miguel, De Leeneer, Kim, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Dolcetti, Riccardo, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Eccles, Diana, Eeles, Ros, Einbeigi, Zakaria, Ejlertsen, Bent, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Gareth Evans, D, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Foretova, Lenka, Fostira, Florentia, Foulkes, William D, Fountzilas, George, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Ganschow, Pamela, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Gayther, Simon A, GEMO Study Collaborators, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldgar, David E, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas VO, Hart, Steven, Hays, John L, HEBON, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Hulick, Peter J, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Izatt, Louise, Jakubowska, Anna, James, Paul, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jensen, Uffe Birk, John, Esther M, Joseph, Vijai, Just, Walter, Kaczmarek, Katarzyna, Karlan, Beth Y, KConFab Investigators, Kets, Carolien M, Kirk, Judy, Kriege, Mieke, Laitman, Yael, Laurent, Maïté, Lazaro, Conxi, Leslie, Goska, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne, Liljegren, Annelie, Loman, Niklas, Loud, Jennifer T, Manoukian, Siranoush, and Mariani, Milena

Subjects
EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Risk, Gene Expression, Heterozygote, Mutation, Alleles, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Quantitative Trait Loci, Female, Genetic Variation, Biomarkers, Tumor, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, Breast cancer, Cis-regulatory variants, Differential allelic expression, Genetic modifiers, Genetic susceptibility, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11, Genes, BRCA1, BRCA2, Biomarkers, Tumor, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Sciences
Abstract

PurposeCis-acting regulatory SNPs resulting in differential allelic expression (DAE) may, in part, explain the underlying phenotypic variation associated with many complex diseases. To investigate whether common variants associated with DAE were involved in breast cancer susceptibility among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, a list of 175 genes was developed based of their involvement in cancer-related pathways.MethodsUsing data from a genome-wide map of SNPs associated with allelic expression, we assessed the association of ~320 SNPs located in the vicinity of these genes with breast and ovarian cancer risks in 15,252 BRCA1 and 8211 BRCA2 mutation carriers ascertained from 54 studies participating in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2.ResultsWe identified a region on 11q22.3 that is significantly associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (most significant SNP rs228595 p = 7 × 10-6). This association was absent in BRCA2 carriers (p = 0.57). The 11q22.3 region notably encompasses genes such as ACAT1, NPAT, and ATM. Expression quantitative trait loci associations were observed in both normal breast and tumors across this region, namely for ACAT1, ATM, and other genes. In silico analysis revealed some overlap between top risk-associated SNPs and relevant biological features in mammary cell data, which suggests potential functional significance.ConclusionWe identified 11q22.3 as a new modifier locus in BRCA1 carriers. Replication in larger studies using estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or triple-negative (i.e., ER-, progesterone receptor-, and HER2-negative) cases could therefore be helpful to confirm the association of this locus with breast cancer risk.

Published
2017

5. Inheritance of deleterious mutations at both BRCA1 and BRCA2 in an international sample of 32,295 women.

Author

Rebbeck, Timothy R, Friebel, Tara M, Mitra, Nandita, Wan, Fei, Chen, Stephanie, Andrulis, Irene L, Apostolou, Paraskevi, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Barrowdale, Daniel, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Raanan, Berthet, Pascaline, Borg, Ake, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Carter, Jonathan, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Claes, Kathleen BM, Couch, Fergus J, Cybulski, Cezary, Daly, Mary B, de la Hoya, Miguel, Diez, Orland, Domchek, Susan M, Nathanson, Katherine L, Durda, Katarzyna, Ellis, Steve, EMBRACE, Evans, D Gareth, Foretova, Lenka, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Ganz, Patricia A, Garber, Judy, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Hahnen, Eric, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas VO, HEBON, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Isaacs, Claudine, Jakubowska, Anna, Janavicius, Ramunas, Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna, John, Esther M, Karlan, Beth Y, Kaufman, Bella, Investigators, KConFab, Kwong, Ava, Laitman, Yael, Lasset, Christine, Lazaro, Conxi, Lester, Jenny, Loman, Niklas, Lubinski, Jan, Manoukian, Siranoush, Mitchell, Gillian, Montagna, Marco, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Niederacher, Dieter, Nussbaum, Robert L, Offit, Kenneth, Olah, Edith, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Park, Sue Kyung, Piedmonte, Marion, Radice, Paolo, Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Christine, Rookus, Matti A, Seynaeve, Caroline, Simard, Jacques, Singer, Christian F, Soucy, Penny, Southey, Melissa, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Szabo, Csilla I, Tancredi, Mariella, Teixeira, Manuel R, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Terry, Mary Beth, Thomassen, Mads, Tihomirova, Laima, Tischkowitz, Marc, Toland, Amanda Ewart, Toloczko-Grabarek, Aleksandra, Tung, Nadine, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Villano, Danylo, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Zidan, Jamal, and Zorn, Kristin K

Subjects
EMBRACE, HEBON, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Heterozygote, Phenotype, Loss of Heterozygosity, Germ-Line Mutation, Alleles, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Exons, Female, Promoter Regions, Genetic, BRCA1, BRCA2, Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Transheterozygosity, Genes, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundMost BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers have inherited a single (heterozygous) mutation. Transheterozygotes (TH) who have inherited deleterious mutations in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are rare, and the consequences of transheterozygosity are poorly understood.MethodsFrom 32,295 female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, we identified 93 TH (0.3 %). "Cases" were defined as TH, and "controls" were single mutations at BRCA1 (SH1) or BRCA2 (SH2). Matched SH1 "controls" carried a BRCA1 mutation found in the TH "case". Matched SH2 "controls" carried a BRCA2 mutation found in the TH "case". After matching the TH carriers with SH1 or SH2, 91 TH were matched to 9316 SH1, and 89 TH were matched to 3370 SH2.ResultsThe majority of TH (45.2 %) involved the three common Jewish mutations. TH were more likely than SH1 and SH2 women to have been ever diagnosed with breast cancer (BC; p = 0.002). TH were more likely to be diagnosed with ovarian cancer (OC) than SH2 (p = 0.017), but not SH1. Age at BC diagnosis was the same in TH vs. SH1 (p = 0.231), but was on average 4.5 years younger in TH than in SH2 (p

Published
2016

6. No clinical utility of KRAS variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer

Author

Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Hollestelle, Antoinette, van der Baan, Frederieke H, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Aben, Katja K, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Antoniou, Antonis C, Apicella, Carmel, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Ashworth, Alan, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Baglietto, Laura, Balleine, Rosemary, Bandera, Elisa V, Barrowdale, Daniel, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Beuselinck, Benoit, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Register, Breast Cancer Family, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Bunker, Clareann H, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joseph, Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed M, Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos Santos Silva, Isabel, du Bois, Andreas, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Duran, Mercedes, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B, Ellis, Steve D, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, and Flesch-Janys, Dieter

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Genetic Testing, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), KRAS variant, Breast cancer, Ovarian cancer, Genetic association, Clinical outcome, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Breast Cancer Family Register, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, GENICA Network, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, SWE-BRCA, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Reproductive medicine
Abstract

ObjectiveClinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370.MethodsCentralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers).ResultsWe found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations.Conclusionsrs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers.

Published
2016

7. Breast cancer risk variants at 6q25 display different phenotype associations and regulate ESR1, RMND1 and CCDC170.

Author

Dunning, Alison M, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Thompson, Deborah, French, Juliet D, Beesley, Jonathan, Healey, Catherine S, Kar, Siddhartha, Pooley, Karen A, Lopez-Knowles, Elena, Dicks, Ed, Barrowdale, Daniel, Sinnott-Armstrong, Nicholas A, Sallari, Richard C, Hillman, Kristine M, Kaufmann, Susanne, Sivakumaran, Haran, Moradi Marjaneh, Mahdi, Lee, Jason S, Hills, Margaret, Jarosz, Monika, Drury, Suzie, Canisius, Sander, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Wang, Qin, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Broeks, Annegien, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Muir, Kenneth, Beckmann, Matthias W, Fasching, Peter A, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Peto, Julian, Sawyer, Elinor J, Tomlinson, Ian, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Bojesen, Stig E, Flyger, Henrik, González-Neira, Anna, Perez, Jose IA, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Eunjung, Lee, Arndt, Volker, Brenner, Hermann, Meindl, Alfons, Schmutzler, Rita K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Hamann, Ute, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl, Ito, Hidemi, Matsuo, Keitaro, Bogdanova, Natasha, Dörk, Thilo, Lindblom, Annika, Margolin, Sara, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Mannermaa, Arto, Tseng, Chiu-Chen, Wu, Anna H, Lambrechts, Diether, Wildiers, Hans, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Peterlongo, Paolo, Radice, Paolo, Olson, Janet E, Giles, Graham G, Milne, Roger L, Haiman, Christopher A, Henderson, Brian E, Goldberg, Mark S, Teo, Soo H, Yip, Cheng Har, Nord, Silje, Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Kristensen, Vessela, Long, Jirong, Zheng, Wei, Pylkäs, Katri, Winqvist, Robert, Andrulis, Irene L, Knight, Julia A, Devilee, Peter, Seynaeve, Caroline, Figueroa, Jonine, Sherman, Mark E, Czene, Kamila, Darabi, Hatef, Hollestelle, Antoinette, van den Ouweland, Ans MW, Humphreys, Keith, Gao, Yu-Tang, and Shu, Xiao-Ou

Subjects
EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, kConFab Investigators, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Carrier Proteins, Cell Cycle Proteins, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Risk Factors, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Base Sequence, Protein Binding, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Cancer, Clinical Research, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract

We analyzed 3,872 common genetic variants across the ESR1 locus (encoding estrogen receptor α) in 118,816 subjects from three international consortia. We found evidence for at least five independent causal variants, each associated with different phenotype sets, including estrogen receptor (ER(+) or ER(-)) and human ERBB2 (HER2(+) or HER2(-)) tumor subtypes, mammographic density and tumor grade. The best candidate causal variants for ER(-) tumors lie in four separate enhancer elements, and their risk alleles reduce expression of ESR1, RMND1 and CCDC170, whereas the risk alleles of the strongest candidates for the remaining independent causal variant disrupt a silencer element and putatively increase ESR1 and RMND1 expression.

Published
2016

8. BRCA2 Polymorphic Stop Codon K3326X and the Risk of Breast, Prostate, and Ovarian Cancers.

Author

Meeks, Huong D, Song, Honglin, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Wang, Qin, Barrowdale, Daniel, Frost, Debra, EMBRACE, McGuffog, Lesley, Ellis, Steve, Feng, Bingjian, Buys, Saundra S, Hopper, John L, Southey, Melissa C, Tesoriero, Andrea, kConFab Investigators, James, Paul A, Bruinsma, Fiona, Campbell, Ian G, Australia Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Broeks, Annegien, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Hogervorst, Frans BL, HEBON, Beckman, Matthias W, Fasching, Peter A, Fletcher, Olivia, Johnson, Nichola, Sawyer, Elinor J, Riboli, Elio, Banerjee, Susana, Menon, Usha, Tomlinson, Ian, Burwinkel, Barbara, Hamann, Ute, Marme, Frederik, Rudolph, Anja, Janavicius, Ramunas, Tihomirova, Laima, Tung, Nadine, Garber, Judy, Cramer, Daniel, Terry, Kathryn L, Poole, Elizabeth M, Tworoger, Shelley S, Dorfling, Cecilia M, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Godwin, Andrew K, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, GEMO Study Collaborators, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Damiola, Francesca, Mazoyer, Sylvie, Sinilnikova, Olga M, Isaacs, Claudine, Maugard, Christine, Bojesen, Stig E, Flyger, Henrik, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Hansen, Thomas VO, Jensen, Allen, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hogdall, Claus, Hogdall, Estrid, Pedersen, Inge Sokilde, Thomassen, Mads, Benitez, Javier, González-Neira, Anna, Osorio, Ana, Hoya, Miguel de la, Segura, Pedro Perez, Diez, Orland, Lazaro, Conxi, Brunet, Joan, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Eunjung, Lee, John, Esther M, Neuhausen, Susan L, Ding, Yuan Chun, Castillo, Danielle, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Ganz, Patricia A, Nussbaum, Robert L, Chan, Salina B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Wu, Anna, Gayther, Simon, Ramus, Susan J, Sieh, Weiva, Whittermore, Alice S, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Phelan, Catherine M, Terry, Mary Beth, Piedmonte, Marion, Offit, Kenneth, Robson, Mark, and Levine, Douglas

Subjects
EMBRACE, kConFab Investigators, Australia Ovarian Cancer Study Group, HEBON, GEMO Study Collaborators, OCGN, PRostate cancer AssoCiation group To Investigate Cancer Associated aLterations in the genome, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Lysine, BRCA2 Protein, Codon, Terminator, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Heterozygote, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Clinical Research, Prevention, Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Aging, Urologic Diseases, Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

The K3326X variant in BRCA2 (BRCA2*c.9976A>T; p.Lys3326*; rs11571833) has been found to be associated with small increased risks of breast cancer. However, it is not clear to what extent linkage disequilibrium with fully pathogenic mutations might account for this association. There is scant information about the effect of K3326X in other hormone-related cancers. Using weighted logistic regression, we analyzed data from the large iCOGS study including 76 637 cancer case patients and 83 796 control patients to estimate odds ratios (ORw) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for K3326X variant carriers in relation to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer risks, with weights defined as probability of not having a pathogenic BRCA2 variant. Using Cox proportional hazards modeling, we also examined the associations of K3326X with breast and ovarian cancer risks among 7183 BRCA1 variant carriers. All statistical tests were two-sided. The K3326X variant was associated with breast (ORw = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.40, P = 5.9x10(-) (6)) and invasive ovarian cancer (ORw = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.43, P = 3.8x10(-3)). These associations were stronger for serous ovarian cancer and for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer (ORw = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.70, P = 3.4x10(-5) and ORw = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.76, P = 4.1x10(-5), respectively). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, there was a statistically significant inverse association of the K3326X variant with risk of ovarian cancer (HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.84, P = .013) but no association with breast cancer. No association with prostate cancer was observed. Our study provides evidence that the K3326X variant is associated with risk of developing breast and ovarian cancers independent of other pathogenic variants in BRCA2. Further studies are needed to determine the biological mechanism of action responsible for these associations.

Published
2016

9. An original phylogenetic approach identified mitochondrial haplogroup T1a1 as inversely associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers

Author

Blein, Sophie, Bardel, Claire, Danjean, Vincent, McGuffog, Lesley, Healey, Sue, Barrowdale, Daniel, Lee, Andrew, Dennis, Joe, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Soucy, Penny, Terry, Mary Beth, Chung, Wendy K, Goldgar, David E, Buys, Saundra S, Breast Cancer Family Registry, Janavicius, Ramunas, Tihomirova, Laima, Tung, Nadine, Dorfling, Cecilia M, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Neuhausen, Susan L, Ding, Yuan Chun, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Ejlertsen, Bent, Nielsen, Finn C, Hansen, Thomas VO, Osorio, Ana, Benitez, Javier, Conejero, Raquel Andrés, Segota, Ena, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Thelander, Margo, Peterlongo, Paolo, Radice, Paolo, Pensotti, Valeria, Dolcetti, Riccardo, Bonanni, Bernardo, Peissel, Bernard, Zaffaroni, Daniela, Scuvera, Giulietta, Manoukian, Siranoush, Varesco, Liliana, Capone, Gabriele L, Papi, Laura, Ottini, Laura, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Garber, Judy, Hamann, Ute, Donaldson, Alan, Brady, Angela, Brewer, Carole, Foo, Claire, Evans, D Gareth, Frost, Debra, Eccles, Diana, EMBRACE, Douglas, Fiona, Cook, Jackie, Adlard, Julian, Barwell, Julian, Walker, Lisa, Izatt, Louise, Side, Lucy E, Kennedy, M John, Tischkowitz, Marc, Rogers, Mark T, Porteous, Mary E, Morrison, Patrick J, Platte, Radka, Eeles, Ros, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hodgson, Shirley, Cole, Trevor, Godwin, Andrew K, Isaacs, Claudine, Claes, Kathleen, De Leeneer, Kim, Meindl, Alfons, Gehrig, Andrea, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Sutter, Christian, Engel, Christoph, Niederacher, Dieter, Steinemann, Doris, Plendl, Hansjoerg, Kast, Karin, Rhiem, Kerstin, Ditsch, Nina, Arnold, Norbert, Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Schmutzler, Rita K, Preisler-Adams, Sabine, Markov, Nadja Bogdanova, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, de Pauw, Antoine, Lefol, Cédrick, Lasset, Christine, Leroux, Dominique, and Rouleau, Etienne

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, BRCA1 Protein, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genes, BRCA2, Genes, Mitochondrial, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Haplotypes, Heterozygote, Humans, Mutation, Phylogeny, Risk, Breast Cancer Family Registry, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

IntroductionIndividuals carrying pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have a high lifetime risk of breast cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in DNA double-strand break repair, DNA alterations that can be caused by exposure to reactive oxygen species, a main source of which are mitochondria. Mitochondrial genome variations affect electron transport chain efficiency and reactive oxygen species production. Individuals with different mitochondrial haplogroups differ in their metabolism and sensitivity to oxidative stress. Variability in mitochondrial genetic background can alter reactive oxygen species production, leading to cancer risk. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that mitochondrial haplogroups modify breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.MethodsWe genotyped 22,214 (11,421 affected, 10,793 unaffected) mutation carriers belonging to the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 for 129 mitochondrial polymorphisms using the iCOGS array. Haplogroup inference and association detection were performed using a phylogenetic approach. ALTree was applied to explore the reference mitochondrial evolutionary tree and detect subclades enriched in affected or unaffected individuals.ResultsWe discovered that subclade T1a1 was depleted in affected BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with the rest of clade T (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34 to 0.88; P = 0.01). Compared with the most frequent haplogroup in the general population (that is, H and T clades), the T1a1 haplogroup has a HR of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P = 0.03). We also identified three potential susceptibility loci, including G13708A/rs28359178, which has demonstrated an inverse association with familial breast cancer risk.ConclusionsThis study illustrates how original approaches such as the phylogeny-based method we used can empower classical molecular epidemiological studies aimed at identifying association or risk modification effects.

Published
2015

10. Identification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

Author

Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Ramus, Susan J, Tyrer, Jonathan, Lee, Andrew, Shen, Howard C, Beesley, Jonathan, Lawrenson, Kate, McGuffog, Lesley, Healey, Sue, Lee, Janet M, Spindler, Tassja J, Lin, Yvonne G, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Li, Qiyuan, Coetzee, Simon, Hazelett, Dennis, Miron, Alexander, Southey, Melissa, Terry, Mary Beth, Goldgar, David E, Buys, Saundra S, Janavicius, Ramunas, Dorfling, Cecilia M, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Neuhausen, Susan L, Ding, Yuan Chun, Hansen, Thomas VO, Jønson, Lars, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Ejlertsen, Bent, Barrowdale, Daniel, Dennis, Joe, Benitez, Javier, Osorio, Ana, Garcia, Maria Jose, Komenaka, Ian, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Ganschow, Pamela, Peterlongo, Paolo, Bernard, Loris, Viel, Alessandra, Bonanni, Bernardo, Peissel, Bernard, Manoukian, Siranoush, Radice, Paolo, Papi, Laura, Ottini, Laura, Fostira, Florentia, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Garber, Judy, Frost, Debra, Perkins, Jo, Platte, Radka, Ellis, Steve, EMBRACE, Godwin, Andrew K, Schmutzler, Rita Katharina, Meindl, Alfons, Engel, Christoph, Sutter, Christian, Sinilnikova, Olga M, GEMO Study Collaborators, Damiola, Francesca, Mazoyer, Sylvie, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Claes, Kathleen, De Leeneer, Kim, Kirk, Judy, Rodriguez, Gustavo C, Piedmonte, Marion, O'Malley, David M, de la Hoya, Miguel, Caldes, Trinidad, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Nevanlinna, Heli, Collée, J Margriet, Rookus, Matti A, Oosterwijk, Jan C, Breast Cancer Family Registry, Tihomirova, Laima, Tung, Nadine, Hamann, Ute, Isaccs, Claudine, Tischkowitz, Marc, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian G, Hogervorst, Frans BL, HEBON, Olah, Edith, Diez, Orland, Blanco, Ignacio, Brunet, Joan, Lazaro, Conxi, Pujana, Miquel Angel, Jakubowska, Anna, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, and Sukiennicki, Grzegorz

Subjects
EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, Breast Cancer Family Registry, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk, Genotype, Heterozygote, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Genes, Reporter, Quantitative Trait Loci, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Young Adult, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Genetics, Cancer, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 12 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility alleles. The pattern of association at these loci is consistent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who are at high risk of EOC. After imputation to 1000 Genomes Project data, we assessed associations of 11 million genetic variants with EOC risk from 15,437 cases unselected for family history and 30,845 controls and from 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers (3,096 with ovarian cancer), and we combined the results in a meta-analysis. This new study design yielded increased statistical power, leading to the discovery of six new EOC susceptibility loci. Variants at 1p36 (nearest gene, WNT4), 4q26 (SYNPO2), 9q34.2 (ABO) and 17q11.2 (ATAD5) were associated with EOC risk, and at 1p34.3 (RSPO1) and 6p22.1 (GPX6) variants were specifically associated with the serous EOC subtype, all with P < 5 × 10(-8). Incorporating these variants into risk assessment tools will improve clinical risk predictions for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Published
2015

11. Candidate Genetic Modifiers for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Author

Peterlongo, Paolo, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B, Rudolph, Anja, Schmutzler, Rita K, Simard, Jacques, Soucy, Penny, Eeles, Rosalind A, Easton, Douglas F, Hamann, Ute, Wilkening, Stefan, Chen, Bowang, Rookus, Matti A, Schmidt, Marjanka K, van der Baan, Frederieke H, Spurdle, Amanda B, Walker, Logan C, Lose, Felicity, Maia, Ana-Teresa, Montagna, Marco, Matricardi, Laura, Lubinski, Jan, Jakubowska, Anna, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Nussbaum, Robert L, Nathanson, Katherine L, Domchek, Susan M, Rebbeck, Timothy R, Arun, Banu K, Karlan, Beth Y, Orsulic, Sandra, Lester, Jenny, Chung, Wendy K, Miron, Alex, Southey, Melissa C, Goldgar, David E, Buys, Saundra S, Janavicius, Ramunas, Dorfling, Cecilia M, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Ding, Yuan Chun, Neuhausen, Susan L, Hansen, Thomas VO, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Ejlertsen, Bent, Jønson, Lars, Osorio, Ana, Martínez-Bouzas, Cristina, Benitez, Javier, Conway, Edye E, Blazer, Kathleen R, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Manoukian, Siranoush, Peissel, Bernard, Zaffaroni, Daniela, Scuvera, Giulietta, Barile, Monica, Ficarazzi, Filomena, Mariette, Frederique, Fortuzzi, Stefano, Viel, Alessandra, Giannini, Giuseppe, Papi, Laura, Martayan, Aline, Tibiletti, Maria Grazia, Radice, Paolo, Vratimos, Athanassios, Fostira, Florentia, Garber, Judy E, Donaldson, Alan, Brewer, Carole, Foo, Claire, Evans, D Gareth R, Frost, Debra, Eccles, Diana, Brady, Angela, Cook, Jackie, Tischkowitz, Marc, Adlard, Julian, Barwell, Julian, Walker, Lisa, Izatt, Louise, Side, Lucy E, Kennedy, M John, Rogers, Mark T, Porteous, Mary E, Morrison, Patrick J, Platte, Radka, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hodgson, Shirley V, Ellis, Steve, Cole, Trevor, behalf of EMBRACE, on, Godwin, Andrew K, Claes, Kathleen, Van Maerken, Tom, Meindl, Alfons, Gehrig, Andrea, and Sutter, Christian

Subjects
Health Services and Systems, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Breast Cancer, Genetic Testing, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Humans, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundBRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes.MethodsGenotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach.ResultsThe observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments.ConclusionThere is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.ImpactGenome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies.

Published
2015

12. Endometrial Cancer Risk in Women With Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations: Multicenter Cohort Study.

Author

Jonge, Marthe M de, Kroon, Cornelis D de, Jenner, Denise J, Oosting, Jan, Hullu, Joanne A de, Mourits, Marian J E, Garcia, Encarna B Gómez, Ausems, Margreet G E M, Collée, J Margriet, Engelen, Klaartje van, van de Beek, Irma, Group, The Hebon, Smit, Vincent T H B M, Rookus, Matti A, Bock, Geertruida H de, Leeuwen, Flora E van, Bosse, Tjalling, Dekkers, Olaf M, Asperen, Christi J van, and de Jonge, Marthe M

Subjects
*PROTEINS, *RESEARCH, *GENETIC mutation, *RESEARCH methodology, *GERM cells, *EVALUATION research, *GENETIC carriers, *COMPARATIVE studies, *ENDOMETRIAL tumors, *DISEASE susceptibility, *RESEARCH funding, *BREAST tumors, *LONGITUDINAL method
Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) risk in BReast CAncer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers is uncertain; therefore, we assessed this in a large Dutch nationwide cohort study.Methods: We selected 5980 BRCA1/2 (3788 BRCA1, 2151 gBRCA2, 41 both BRCA1/BRCA2) and 8451 non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers from the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian cancer study, the Netherlands cohort. Follow-up started at the date of the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry coverage (January 1, 1989) or at the age of 25 years (whichever came last) and ended at date of EC diagnosis, last follow-up, or death (whichever came first). EC risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was compared with 1) the general population, estimating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) based on Dutch population-based incidence rates; and 2) non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, using Cox-regression analyses, expressed as hazard ratio (HR). Statistical tests were 2-sided.Results: Fifty-eight BRCA1/2 and 33 non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers developed EC over 119 296 and 160 841 person-years, respectively (SIR = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.18 to 3.65; and HR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.53 to 3.69, respectively). gBRCA1 mutation carriers showed increased risks for EC overall (SIR = 3.51, 95% CI = 2.61 to 4.72; HR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.83 to 4.66), serous-like EC (SIR = 12.64, 95% CI = 7.62 to 20.96; HR = 10.48, 95% CI = 2.95 to 37.20), endometrioid EC (SIR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.80 to 3.83; HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.18 to 3.45), and TP53-mutated EC (HR = 15.71, 95% CI = 4.62 to 53.40). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, overall (SIR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.01 to 2.87) and serous-like EC risks (SIR = 5.11, 95% CI = 1.92 to 13.63) were increased compared with the general population. Absolute risks by 75 years remained low (overall EC = 3.0%; serous-like EC = 1.1%).Conclusions: BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a two- to threefold increased risk for EC, with highest risk observed for the rare subgroups of serous-like and p53-abnormal EC in BRCA1 mutation carriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Associations of common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with risk of breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Author

Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Neuhausen, Susan L, Robson, Mark, Barrowdale, Daniel, McGuffog, Lesley, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Andrulis, Irene L, Spurdle, Amanda B, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Schmutzler, Rita K, Engel, Christoph, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Nevanlinna, Heli, Thomassen, Mads, Southey, Melissa, Radice, Paolo, Ramus, Susan J, Domchek, Susan M, Nathanson, Katherine L, Lee, Andrew, Healey, Sue, Nussbaum, Robert L, Rebbeck, Timothy R, Arun, Banu K, James, Paul, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Cass, Ilana, Breast Cancer Family Registry, Terry, Mary Beth, Daly, Mary B, Goldgar, David E, Buys, Saundra S, Janavicius, Ramunas, Tihomirova, Laima, Tung, Nadine, Dorfling, Cecilia M, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Steele, Linda, v O Hansen, Thomas, Ejlertsen, Bent, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Nielsen, Finn C, Dennis, Joe, Cunningham, Julie, Hart, Steven, Slager, Susan, Osorio, Ana, Benitez, Javier, Duran, Mercedes, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Tafur, Isaac, Hander, Mary, Peterlongo, Paolo, Manoukian, Siranoush, Peissel, Bernard, Roversi, Gaia, Scuvera, Giulietta, Bonanni, Bernardo, Mariani, Paolo, Volorio, Sara, Dolcetti, Riccardo, Varesco, Liliana, Papi, Laura, Tibiletti, Maria Grazia, Giannini, Giuseppe, Fostira, Florentia, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Garber, Judy, Hamann, Ute, Donaldson, Alan, Brewer, Carole, Foo, Claire, Evans, D Gareth, Frost, Debra, Eccles, Diana, EMBRACE Study, Douglas, Fiona, Brady, Angela, Cook, Jackie, Tischkowitz, Marc, Adlard, Julian, Barwell, Julian, Ong, Kai-ren, Walker, Lisa, Izatt, Louise, Side, Lucy E, Kennedy, M John, Rogers, Mark T, Porteous, Mary E, Morrison, Patrick J, Platte, Radka, Eeles, Ros, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hodgson, Shirley, Ellis, Steve, Godwin, Andrew K, Rhiem, Kerstin, Meindl, Alfons, and Ditsch, Nina

Subjects
Breast Cancer Family Registry, EMBRACE Study, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, CIMBA, Humans, Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Carcinoma, Lobular, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Receptor, erbB-2, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Neoplasm Staging, Heterozygote, Alleles, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Neoplasm Grading, Receptor, ErbB-2, Ductal, Breast, Lobular, Receptor, erbB-2, Receptors, Estrogen, Progesterone, Genes, BRCA1, BRCA2, ErbB-2, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Clinical Research, Genetics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

IntroductionMore than 70 common alleles are known to be involved in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility, and several exhibit significant heterogeneity in their associations with different BC subtypes. Although there are differences in the association patterns between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and the general population for several loci, no study has comprehensively evaluated the associations of all known BC susceptibility alleles with risk of BC subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.MethodsWe used data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 carriers to analyze the associations between approximately 200,000 genetic variants on the iCOGS array and risk of BC subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and triple-negative- (TN) status; morphologic subtypes; histological grade; and nodal involvement.ResultsThe estimated BC hazard ratios (HRs) for the 74 known BC alleles in BRCA1 carriers exhibited moderate correlations with the corresponding odds ratios from the general population. However, their associations with ER-positive BC in BRCA1 carriers were more consistent with the ER-positive associations in the general population (intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45 to 0.74), and the same was true when considering ER-negative associations in both groups (ICC = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.72). Similarly, there was strong correlation between the ER-positive associations for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.78), whereas ER-positive associations in any one of the groups were generally inconsistent with ER-negative associations in any of the others. After stratifying by ER status in mutation carriers, additional significant associations were observed. Several previously unreported variants exhibited associations at P

Published
2014

14. DNA glycosylases involved in base excision repair may be associated with cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Author

Osorio, Ana, Milne, Roger L, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline, Vaclová, Tereza, Pita, Guillermo, Alonso, Rosario, Peterlongo, Paolo, Blanco, Ignacio, de la Hoya, Miguel, Duran, Mercedes, Díez, Orland, Ramón Y Cajal, Teresa, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Martínez-Bouzas, Cristina, Andrés Conejero, Raquel, Soucy, Penny, McGuffog, Lesley, Barrowdale, Daniel, Lee, Andrew, SWE-BRCA, Arver, Brita, Rantala, Johanna, Loman, Niklas, Ehrencrona, Hans, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Beattie, Mary S, Domchek, Susan M, Nathanson, Katherine, Rebbeck, Timothy R, Arun, Banu K, Karlan, Beth Y, Walsh, Christine, Lester, Jenny, John, Esther M, Whittemore, Alice S, Daly, Mary B, Southey, Melissa, Hopper, John, Terry, Mary B, Buys, Saundra S, Janavicius, Ramunas, Dorfling, Cecilia M, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Steele, Linda, Neuhausen, Susan L, Ding, Yuan Chun, Hansen, Thomas VO, Jønson, Lars, Ejlertsen, Bent, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Infante, Mar, Herráez, Belén, Moreno, Leticia Thais, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Herzog, Josef, Weeman, Kisa, Manoukian, Siranoush, Peissel, Bernard, Zaffaroni, Daniela, Scuvera, Giulietta, Bonanni, Bernardo, Mariette, Frederique, Volorio, Sara, Viel, Alessandra, Varesco, Liliana, Papi, Laura, Ottini, Laura, Tibiletti, Maria Grazia, Radice, Paolo, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Garber, Judy, Ellis, Steve, Frost, Debra, Platte, Radka, Fineberg, Elena, Evans, Gareth, Lalloo, Fiona, Izatt, Louise, Eeles, Ros, Adlard, Julian, Davidson, Rosemarie, Cole, Trevor, Eccles, Diana, Cook, Jackie, Hodgson, Shirley, Brewer, Carole, Tischkowitz, Marc, Douglas, Fiona, Porteous, Mary, Side, Lucy, Walker, Lisa, Morrison, Patrick, Donaldson, Alan, Kennedy, John, Foo, Claire, Godwin, Andrew K, Schmutzler, Rita Katharina, Wappenschmidt, Barbara, Rhiem, Kerstin, and Engel, Christoph

Subjects
SWE-BRCA, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, DNA Glycosylases, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk, DNA Repair, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, and over, Developmental Biology, Genetics
Abstract

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway could be associated with cancer risk in carriers of mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the BER pathway, PARP1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase), and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of 18 genes involved in BER using a tagging SNP approach in a large series of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. 144 SNPs were analyzed in a two stage study involving 23,463 carriers from the CIMBA consortium (the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). Eleven SNPs showed evidence of association with breast and/or ovarian cancer at p

Published
2014

15. Genome-wide association study in BRCA1 mutation carriers identifies novel loci associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Author

Couch, Fergus J, Wang, Xianshu, McGuffog, Lesley, Lee, Andrew, Olswold, Curtis, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Soucy, Penny, Fredericksen, Zachary, Barrowdale, Daniel, Dennis, Joe, Gaudet, Mia M, Dicks, Ed, Kosel, Matthew, Healey, Sue, Sinilnikova, Olga M, Lee, Adam, Bacot, François, Vincent, Daniel, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Peock, Susan, Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Jakubowska, Anna, kConFab Investigators, Radice, Paolo, Schmutzler, Rita Katharina, SWE-BRCA, Domchek, Susan M, Piedmonte, Marion, Singer, Christian F, Friedman, Eitan, Thomassen, Mads, Ontario Cancer Genetics Network, Hansen, Thomas VO, Neuhausen, Susan L, Szabo, Csilla I, Blanco, Ignacio, Greene, Mark H, Karlan, Beth Y, Garber, Judy, Phelan, Catherine M, Weitzel, Jeffrey N, Montagna, Marco, Olah, Edith, Andrulis, Irene L, Godwin, Andrew K, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis, Goldgar, David E, Caldes, Trinidad, Nevanlinna, Heli, Osorio, Ana, Terry, Mary Beth, Daly, Mary B, van Rensburg, Elizabeth J, Hamann, Ute, Ramus, Susan J, Toland, Amanda Ewart, Caligo, Maria A, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Tung, Nadine, Claes, Kathleen, Beattie, Mary S, Southey, Melissa C, Imyanitov, Evgeny N, Tischkowitz, Marc, Janavicius, Ramunas, John, Esther M, Kwong, Ava, Diez, Orland, Balmaña, Judith, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Arun, Banu K, Rennert, Gad, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Ganz, Patricia A, Campbell, Ian, van der Hout, Annemarie H, van Deurzen, Carolien HM, Seynaeve, Caroline, Gómez Garcia, Encarna B, van Leeuwen, Flora E, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne EJ, Gille, Johannes JP, Ausems, Margreet GEM, Blok, Marinus J, Ligtenberg, Marjolijn JL, Rookus, Matti A, Devilee, Peter, Verhoef, Senno, van Os, Theo AM, Wijnen, Juul T, HEBON, EMBRACE, Frost, Debra, Ellis, Steve, Fineberg, Elena, Platte, Radka, Evans, D Gareth, Izatt, Louise, Eeles, Rosalind A, and Adlard, Julian

Subjects
kConFab Investigators, SWE-BRCA, Ontario Cancer Genetics Network, HEBON, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, BCFR, CIMBA, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Genotype, Heterozygote, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Middle Aged, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Developmental Biology, Genetics
Abstract

BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer risks can be modified by common genetic variants. To identify further cancer risk-modifying loci, we performed a multi-stage GWAS of 11,705 BRCA1 carriers (of whom 5,920 were diagnosed with breast and 1,839 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer), with a further replication in an additional sample of 2,646 BRCA1 carriers. We identified a novel breast cancer risk modifier locus at 1q32 for BRCA1 carriers (rs2290854, P = 2.7 × 10(-8), HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). In addition, we identified two novel ovarian cancer risk modifier loci: 17q21.31 (rs17631303, P = 1.4 × 10(-8), HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38) and 4q32.3 (rs4691139, P = 3.4 × 10(-8), HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38). The 4q32.3 locus was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in the general population or BRCA2 carriers, suggesting a BRCA1-specific association. The 17q21.31 locus was also associated with ovarian cancer risk in 8,211 BRCA2 carriers (P = 2×10(-4)). These loci may lead to an improved understanding of the etiology of breast and ovarian tumors in BRCA1 carriers. Based on the joint distribution of the known BRCA1 breast cancer risk-modifying loci, we estimated that the breast cancer lifetime risks for the 5% of BRCA1 carriers at lowest risk are 28%-50% compared to 81%-100% for the 5% at highest risk. Similarly, based on the known ovarian cancer risk-modifying loci, the 5% of BRCA1 carriers at lowest risk have an estimated lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer of 28% or lower, whereas the 5% at highest risk will have a risk of 63% or higher. Such differences in risk may have important implications for risk prediction and clinical management for BRCA1 carriers.

Published
2013

16. Breast cancer risk and 6q22.33: combined results from Breast Cancer Association Consortium and Consortium of Investigators on Modifiers of BRCA1/2.

Author

Kirchhoff, Tomas, Gaudet, Mia M, Antoniou, Antonis C, McGuffog, Lesley, Humphreys, Manjeet K, Dunning, Alison M, Bojesen, Stig E, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Flyger, Henrik, Kang, Daehee, Yoo, Keun-Young, Noh, Dong-Young, Ahn, Sei-Hyun, Dork, Thilo, Schürmann, Peter, Karstens, Johann H, Hillemanns, Peter, Couch, Fergus J, Olson, Janet, Vachon, Celine, Wang, Xianshu, Cox, Angela, Brock, Ian, Elliott, Graeme, Reed, Malcolm WR, Burwinkel, Barbara, Meindl, Alfons, Brauch, Hiltrud, Hamann, Ute, Ko, Yon-Dschun, GENICA Network, Broeks, Annegien, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Van 't Veer, Laura J, Braaf, Linde M, Johnson, Nichola, Fletcher, Olivia, Gibson, Lorna, Peto, Julian, Turnbull, Clare, Seal, Sheila, Renwick, Anthony, Rahman, Nazneen, Wu, Pei-Ei, Yu, Jyh-Cherng, Hsiung, Chia-Ni, Shen, Chen-Yang, Southey, Melissa C, Hopper, John L, Hammet, Fleur, Van Dorpe, Thijs, Dieudonne, Anne-Sophie, Hatse, Sigrid, Lambrechts, Diether, Andrulis, Irene L, Bogdanova, Natalia, Antonenkova, Natalia, Rogov, Juri I, Prokofieva, Daria, Bermisheva, Marina, Khusnutdinova, Elza, van Asperen, Christi J, Tollenaar, Robert AEM, Hooning, Maartje J, Devilee, Peter, Margolin, Sara, Lindblom, Annika, Milne, Roger L, Arias, José Ignacio, Zamora, M Pilar, Benítez, Javier, Severi, Gianluca, Baglietto, Laura, Giles, Graham G, kConFab, AOCS Study Group, Spurdle, Amanda B, Beesley, Jonathan, Chen, Xiaoqing, Holland, Helene, Healey, Sue, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Mannermaa, Arto, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Kauppinen, Jaana, Kataja, Vesa, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Caligo, Maria A, Godwin, Andrew K, Nevanlinna, Heli, Heikkinen, Tuomas, Fredericksen, Zachary, Lindor, Noralane, Nathanson, Katherine L, Domchek, Susan M, SWE-BRCA, Loman, Niklas, Karlsson, Per, and Stenmark Askmalm, Marie

Subjects
GENICA Network, kConFab, AOCS Study Group, SWE-BRCA, HEBON, EMBRACE, BCAC/CIMBA, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Receptors, Estrogen, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Heterozygote, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Middle Aged, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptors, Estrogen, General Science & Technology
Abstract

Recently, a locus on chromosome 6q22.33 (rs2180341) was reported to be associated with increased breast cancer risk in the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population, and this association was also observed in populations of non-AJ European ancestry. In the present study, we performed a large replication analysis of rs2180341 using data from 31,428 invasive breast cancer cases and 34,700 controls collected from 25 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). In addition, we evaluated whether rs2180341 modifies breast cancer risk in 3,361 BRCA1 and 2,020 BRCA2 carriers from 11 centers in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Based on the BCAC data from women of European ancestry, we found evidence for a weak association with breast cancer risk for rs2180341 (per-allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.023). There was evidence for heterogeneity in the ORs among studies (I(2) = 49.3%; p =

Published
2012

17. Interplay between BRCA1 and RHAMM regulates epithelial apicobasal polarization and may influence risk of breast cancer.

Author

Maxwell, Christopher A, Benítez, Javier, Gómez-Baldó, Laia, Osorio, Ana, Bonifaci, Núria, Fernández-Ramires, Ricardo, Costes, Sylvain V, Guinó, Elisabet, Chen, Helen, Evans, Gareth JR, Mohan, Pooja, Català, Isabel, Petit, Anna, Aguilar, Helena, Villanueva, Alberto, Aytes, Alvaro, Serra-Musach, Jordi, Rennert, Gad, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Peterlongo, Paolo, Manoukian, Siranoush, Peissel, Bernard, Ripamonti, Carla B, Bonanni, Bernardo, Viel, Alessandra, Allavena, Anna, Bernard, Loris, Radice, Paolo, Friedman, Eitan, Kaufman, Bella, Laitman, Yael, Dubrovsky, Maya, Milgrom, Roni, Jakubowska, Anna, Cybulski, Cezary, Gorski, Bohdan, Jaworska, Katarzyna, Durda, Katarzyna, Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Lubiński, Jan, Shugart, Yin Yao, Domchek, Susan M, Letrero, Richard, Weber, Barbara L, Hogervorst, Frans BL, Rookus, Matti A, Collee, J Margriet, Devilee, Peter, Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J, Luijt, Rob B van der, Aalfs, Cora M, Waisfisz, Quinten, Wijnen, Juul, Roozendaal, Cornelis EP van, HEBON, EMBRACE, Easton, Douglas F, Peock, Susan, Cook, Margaret, Oliver, Clare, Frost, Debra, Harrington, Patricia, Evans, D Gareth, Lalloo, Fiona, Eeles, Rosalind, Izatt, Louise, Chu, Carol, Eccles, Diana, Douglas, Fiona, Brewer, Carole, Nevanlinna, Heli, Heikkinen, Tuomas, Couch, Fergus J, Lindor, Noralane M, Wang, Xianshu, Godwin, Andrew K, Caligo, Maria A, Lombardi, Grazia, Loman, Niklas, Karlsson, Per, Ehrencrona, Hans, Wachenfeldt, Anna von, SWE-BRCA, Barkardottir, Rosa Bjork, Hamann, Ute, Rashid, Muhammad U, Lasa, Adriana, Caldés, Trinidad, Andrés, Raquel, Schmitt, Michael, Assmann, Volker, Stevens, Kristen, Offit, Kenneth, Curado, João, Tilgner, Hagen, Guigó, Roderic, Aiza, Gemma, Brunet, Joan, Castellsagué, Joan, and Martrat, Griselda

Subjects
HEBON, EMBRACE, SWE-BRCA, BCFR, GEMO Study Collaborators, kConFab, Breast, Cell Line, Tumor, Hela Cells, Microtubules, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Receptors, Estrogen, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Cell Polarity, Genotype, Heterozygote, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Female, Genetic Variation, Aurora Kinase A, Aurora Kinases, Hyaluronan Receptors, HeLa Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Receptors, Estrogen, Genes, BRCA1, BRCA2, Biological Sciences, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract

Differentiated mammary epithelium shows apicobasal polarity, and loss of tissue organization is an early hallmark of breast carcinogenesis. In BRCA1 mutation carriers, accumulation of stem and progenitor cells in normal breast tissue and increased risk of developing tumors of basal-like type suggest that BRCA1 regulates stem/progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the function of BRCA1 in this process and its link to carcinogenesis remain unknown. Here we depict a molecular mechanism involving BRCA1 and RHAMM that regulates apicobasal polarity and, when perturbed, may increase risk of breast cancer. Starting from complementary genetic analyses across families and populations, we identified common genetic variation at the low-penetrance susceptibility HMMR locus (encoding for RHAMM) that modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA1, but probably not BRCA2, mutation carriers: n = 7,584, weighted hazard ratio ((w)HR) = 1.09 (95% CI 1.02-1.16), p(trend) = 0.017; and n = 3,965, (w)HR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.94-1.16), p(trend) = 0.43; respectively. Subsequently, studies of MCF10A apicobasal polarization revealed a central role for BRCA1 and RHAMM, together with AURKA and TPX2, in essential reorganization of microtubules. Mechanistically, reorganization is facilitated by BRCA1 and impaired by AURKA, which is regulated by negative feedback involving RHAMM and TPX2. Taken together, our data provide fundamental insight into apicobasal polarization through BRCA1 function, which may explain the expanded cell subsets and characteristic tumor type accompanying BRCA1 mutation, while also linking this process to sporadic breast cancer through perturbation of HMMR/RHAMM.

Published
2011

18. Body weight and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Author

Manders, Peggy, Pijpe, Anouk, Hooning, Maartje, Kluijt, Irma, Vasen, Hans, Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, Asperen, Christi, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, Ausems, Margreet, Os, Theo, Gomez-Garcia, Encarna, Brohet, Richard, Leeuwen, Flora, and Rookus, Matti

Abstract

Obesity is an established risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer in the general population. However, it is still unclear whether this association also exists in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We investigated the association between self-reported anthropometric measures and breast cancer risk in a nationwide retrospective cohort study, including 719 BRCA1/2 carriers, of whom 218 had been diagnosed with breast cancer within 10 years prior to questionnaire completion. All time-varying Cox proportional hazards analyses were stratified by menopausal status. For premenopausal breast cancer, no statistically significant associations were observed for any of the anthropometric measures. The association between body mass index (BMI) at age 18 and premenopausal breast cancer risk suggested a trend of decreasing risk with increasing BMI (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.47-1.44 and HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.13-1.27). For postmenopausal breast cancer, being 1.67 m and taller increased the risk 1.7-fold (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.01-2.74) when compared to a height <1.67 m. Compared with a current body weight <72 kg, a current body weight of ≥72 kg increased the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer 2.1-fold (95% CI = 1.23-3.59). A current BMI of ≥25.0 kg/m, an adult weight gain of 5 kg or more, and a relative adult weight gain of 20% or more were all non-significantly associated with a 50-60% increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer [HR = 1.46 (0.86-2.51), HR = 1.56 (95% CI = 0.85-2.87), and HR = 1.60 (95% CI = 0.97-2.63), respectively], when compared with having a healthy or stable weight. No associations for body weight or BMI at age 18 were observed. In conclusion, menopausal status seemed to modify the association between body weight and breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. We observed no clear association between body weight and premenopausal breast cancer, while overweight and weight gain increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Carriers may reduce their risk of postmenopausal breast cancer by maintaining a healthy body weight throughout life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Author

Pijpe, Anouk, Manders, Peggy, Brohet, Richard, Collée, J., Verhoef, Senno, Vasen, Hans, Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, Asperen, Christi, Dommering, Charlotte, Ausems, Margreet, Aalfs, Cora, Gomez-Garcia, Encarna, Veer, Laura, Leeuwen, Flora, and Rookus, Matti

Abstract

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Differences in penetrance indicate that this risk may be influenced by lifestyle factors. Because physical activity is one of the few modifiable risk factors, it may provide a target to add to breast cancer prevention in this high-risk population. We examined the association between self-reported lifetime sports activity and breast cancer risk in a nationwide retrospective cohort study, including 725 carriers, of whom 218 had been diagnosed with breast cancer within 10 years prior to questionnaire completion. We found a nonsignificantly decreased risk for ever engaging in sports activity (HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.57–1.24). Among women who had participated in sports, a medium versus low level of intensity and duration (i.e., between 11.0 and 22.7 mean MET hours/week averaged over a lifetime) reduced the risk of breast cancer (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.36–0.95); no dose–response trend was observed. For mean hours/week of sports activity, a nonsignificant trend was observed (HRlow versus never = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.60–1.43; HRmedium versus never = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.51–1.29; HRhigh versus never = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.48–1.29; ptrend overall = 0.272; ptrend active women = 0.487). For number of years of sports activity no significant associations were found. Among women active in sports before age 30, mean MET hours/week showed the strongest inverse association of all activity measures (HRmedium versus low = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.38–0.96; HRhigh versus low = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.35–0.94; ptrend = 0.053). Engaging in sports activity after age 30 was also inversely associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.44–0.91). Our results indicate that sports activity may reduce the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Correction: Evaluation of copy-number variants as modifiers of breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers

Author

Walker, Logan C, Marquart, Louise, Pearson, John F, Wiggins, George AR, O'Mara, Tracy A, Parsons, Michael T, BCFR, Barrowdale, Daniel, McGuffog, Lesley, Dennis, Joe, Benitez, Javier, Slavin, Thomas P, Radice, Paolo, Frost, Debra, EMBRACE, Godwin, Andrew K, Meindl, Alfons, Schmutzler, Rita Katharina, GEMO Study Collaborators, Isaacs, Claudine, Peshkin, Beth N, Caldes, Trinidad, Hogervorst, Frans BL, HEBON, Lazaro, Conxi, Jakubowska, Anna, Montagna, Marco, KConFab Investigators, Chen, Xiaoqing, Offit, Kenneth, Hulick, Peter J, Andrulis, Irene L, Lindblom, Annika, Nussbaum, Robert L, Nathanson, Katherine L, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Antoniou, Antonis C, Couch, Fergus J, Spurdle, Amanda B, Dennis, Joseph [0000-0003-4591-1214], Antoniou, Antonis [0000-0001-9223-3116], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
GEMO Study Collaborators, BCFR, KConFab Investigators, HEBON, EMBRACE
Abstract

This Article was originally published under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license, but has now been made available under a CC BY 4.0 license. The PDF and HTML versions of the Article have been modified accordingly.

Published
2019

21. No clinical utility of KRAS variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer

Author

Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Hollestelle, Antoinette, van der Baan, Frederieke H, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Aben, Katja K, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Antoniou, Antonis C, Apicella, Carmel, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Ashworth, Alan, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Baglietto, Laura, Balleine, Rosemary, Bandera, Elisa V, Barrowdale, Daniel, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Beuselinck, Benoit, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Breast Cancer Family Register, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Bunker, Clareann H, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joseph, Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed M, Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dörk, Thilo, Silva, Isabel Dos Santos, du Bois, Andreas, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Duran, Mercedes, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B, Ellis, Steve D, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, and Flesch-Janys, Dieter

Subjects
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, endocrine system diseases, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Breast Neoplasms, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Breast cancer, Rare Diseases, Ovarian cancer, Clinical Research, Neoplasms, Ovarian Epithelial, Genetics, Humans, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Aetiology, skin and connective tissue diseases, HEBON, Cancer, Ovarian Neoplasms, Clinical outcome, Prevention, Carcinoma, Glandular and Epithelial, SWE-BRCA, KRAS variant, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Genetic association, Female, KConFab Investigators, GENICA Network, Breast Cancer Family Register
Abstract

ObjectiveClinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370.MethodsCentralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers).ResultsWe found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations.Conclusionsrs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers.

Published
2016

22. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

Author

Senno Verhoef, Christi J. van Asperen, Charlotte J. Dommering, Peggy Manders, J. Margriet Collée, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Matti A. Rookus, Anouk Pijpe, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Hans F. A. Vasen, Richard M. Brohet, Encarna B. Gomez-Garcia, Laura J. van't Veer, Cora M. Aalfs, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Human Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center [Nijmegen], Department of Research and Education, Spaarne hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus University Medical Center [Rotterdam] (Erasmus MC), Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Clinical Genetics and Human Genetics, VU University Medical Center [Amsterdam], Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center [Utrecht], Academic Medical Center - Academisch Medisch Centrum [Amsterdam] (AMC), University of Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (UvA)-University of Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (UvA), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht University [Maastricht]-Maastricht University [Maastricht], Department of Pathology, Human genetics, Epidemiology and Data Science, EMGO - Quality of care, Klinische Genetica, Genetica & Celbiologie, RS: GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Clinical Genetics, and Internal Medicine

Subjects
Adult, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Heterozygote, Genetics and epigenetic pathways of disease [NCMLS 6], Epidemiology, Population, Genes, BRCA2, Genes, BRCA1, Physical exercise, Breast Neoplasms, Molecular epidemiology [NCEBP 1], 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Risk Factors, BRCA1/2, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Risk factor, education, Exercise, HEBON, 030304 developmental biology, Gynecology, 0303 health sciences, education.field_of_study, Hereditary cancer and cancer-related syndromes [ONCOL 1], business.industry, Physical activity, Cancer, Retrospective cohort study, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, 3. Good health, Oncology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Mutation, Female, Breast disease, business, Cohort study
Abstract

Contains fulltext : 89737.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Differences in penetrance indicate that this risk may be influenced by lifestyle factors. Because physical activity is one of the few modifiable risk factors, it may provide a target to add to breast cancer prevention in this high-risk population. We examined the association between self-reported lifetime sports activity and breast cancer risk in a nationwide retrospective cohort study, including 725 carriers, of whom 218 had been diagnosed with breast cancer within 10 years prior to questionnaire completion. We found a nonsignificantly decreased risk for ever engaging in sports activity (HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.57-1.24). Among women who had participated in sports, a medium versus low level of intensity and duration (i.e., between 11.0 and 22.7 mean MET hours/week averaged over a lifetime) reduced the risk of breast cancer (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.36-0.95); no dose-response trend was observed. For mean hours/week of sports activity, a nonsignificant trend was observed (HR(low versus never) = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.60-1.43; HR(medium versus never) = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.51-1.29; HR(high versus never) = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.48-1.29; p (trend overall) = 0.272; p (trend active women) = 0.487). For number of years of sports activity no significant associations were found. Among women active in sports before age 30, mean MET hours/week showed the strongest inverse association of all activity measures (HR(medium versus low) = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.38-0.96; HR(high versus low) = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.35-0.94; p (trend) = 0.053). Engaging in sports activity after age 30 was also inversely associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.44-0.91). Our results indicate that sports activity may reduce the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. 01 februari 2010

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results