Search

ObjectiveThere exists a paucity of data regarding the mechanism and manometric findings in retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD). In this study, we aimed to compare esophageal physiologic findings between patients with RCPD compared to an asymptomatic cohort.Study designCase-control study.SettingTertiary Care Center.MethodsEsophageal high-resolution impedance manometry was completed preoperatively in patients diagnosed with RCPD. Manometric data were compared between the RCPD and asymptomatic cohorts. A 2:1 age-sex-matched asymptomatic cohort was used as the control group. Treatment response was assessed among the RCPD cohort.ResultsThirty-nine patients are included: 13 RCPD [mean age: 31.1 (SD: 12.6) years, female sex: 11 (85%)] and 26 asymptomatic [mean age: 32.1 (SD: 1.5) years, female sex: 22 (85%)]. The RCPD cohort, compared to the asymptomatic cohort, exhibited significantly greater upper esophageal sphincter (UES) length [4.5 (SD: 0.7) vs 3.7 (0.9) cm, P = .01] and higher UES basal pressures [91.9 (35.0) vs 49.7 (25.5) mm Hg, P = .002]. Patients with RCPD demonstrated higher rates of ineffective swallows [70.0% (31.6%) vs 15.4% (21.6%), P

Purpose of review: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a manometric pattern associated with esophageal body hypomotility in the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation during swallows. On high resolution manometry (HRM), modern criteria require > 70% ineffective swallows with distal contractile integral (DCI) < 450 mmHg.cm.s, and/or ≥ 50% failed swallows (DCI < 100 mmHg.cm.s), with normal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). This review addresses the impact of identification of IEM in symptomatic patients. Recent findings: Since diagnostic criteria have been made more stringent with the most recent version of the Chicago Classification (version 4.0), association of IEM with reflux burden is more specific. While the likelihood of abnormal reflux burden and degree of acid exposure are both higher with the new criteria, association with symptoms remains poor. When IEM is identified in the context of dysphagia symptoms, it is important to further evaluate the patient for a structural or motor mechanism to explain dysphagia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Introduction Methods Results Conclusion High‐resolution manometry (HRM) allows assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) disruption. While type 3 EGJ predicts definitive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), type 2 EGJ is less clearly implicated in GERD pathogenesis. This study aimed to characterize physiologic findings in type 2 EGJ to determine if the HRM‐based Milan Score can define GERD within type 2 EGJ.535 patients with suspected GERD who underwent HRM and reflux monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, HRM, and reflux study data were compared between the EGJ morphology subtypes, with objective GERD defined according to Lyon Consensus 2.0. The Milan Score, a novel metric that integrates ineffective esophageal motility, EGJ‐contractile integral, EGJ morphology, and straight leg raise response, was abnormal when ≥ 137 (risk rate 50% for GERD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the Milan Score to predict objective GERD.Type 3 EGJ was associated with the highest rate of objective GERD, followed by type 2 and type 1 EGJ (p < 0.001), with a corresponding stepwise increase in AET from type 1 to 3 EGJ (p < 0.001). Type 2 EGJ with Milan Score < 137 resembled type 1 EGJ (objective GERD in 23.6% vs. 33.2%, p = 0.09), and type 2 EGJ with score ≥ 137 resembled type 3 EGJ (objective GERD in 88.2% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.11). On ROC analysis, the Milan Score had an area under the curve of 0.858.While type 2 EGJ includes varying GERD severity, the Milan Score can segregate patients at risk for objective GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Strength of vocal fold adduction has been hypothesized to be a critical factor influencing vocal acoustics but has been difficult to measure directly during phonation. Recent work has suggested that upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, which can be easily assessed, increases with stronger vocal fold adduction, raising the possibility that UES pressure might indirectly reflect vocal fold adduction strength. However, concurrent UES pressure and vocal acoustics have not previously been examined across different vocal tasks. Doing so may offer insights into the potential use of UES pressure for relative quantification of the strength of vocal fold adduction and how this might contribute to vocal acoustics across different vocal tasks. We assessed UES pressure relative to vocal acoustics in 32 vocally healthy adults during sustained vowels, whispered sentences, and spoken sentences. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPs) and low-to-high spectral energy ratio (LHR) were derived from the acoustic signal. After controlling for resting UES pressure, age, and sex, we observed significant negative correlations between UES pressure and CPPs and a significant positive correlation between UES pressure and LHR. UES pressures were significantly higher during spoken sentences than whispered sentences and sustained vowels. Measuring UES pressure relative to vocal acoustics is a novel methodology for studying upper aerodigestive tract physiology during phonation and has the potential to enhance understanding of voice disruption in clinical populations. Clinical implications and considerations for implementation are discussed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We identified relationships between upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures and vocal acoustics during phonation in vocally healthy individuals, potentially reflecting the influence of strength of vocal fold adduction and other phonatory factors on vocal acoustics. This methodology could lead to the development of a clinical and research tool that could provide insight into the strength of vocal fold adduction, a critical factor influencing voice quality that has historically been difficult to assess. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presents with various esophageal motility disorders, and some cases of hypercontractile esophagus (HE) are associated with eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM). This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with EoE and EoEM according to their esophageal motility. Methods: The 28 patients with EoE and 2 patients with EoEM were divided into three groups based on esophageal motility: normal motility group, hypomotility group, and spastic contraction group. The clinical characteristics of the three groups were retrospectively compared. Results: Among the 28 patients with EoE, there were 15 with normal esophageal motility, 9 with hypomotility (2 with absent contractility, 7 with ineffective esophageal motility), and 4 with spastic contractions (1 with type III achalasia, 1 with HE, 2 with unclassifiable multipeak contractions). The two patients with EoEM had HE. Most patients in the normal and hypomotility groups had typical endoscopic findings of EoE, whereas these typical findings were less common in the spastic contraction group (P < 0.001). Four of the five patients with esophageal stricture were in the hypomotility group (P = 0.036). The therapy method significantly differed between the three groups: the normal group had more patients that responded to a proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker, the hypomotility group had more patients that responded to steroids, and the spastic contraction group contained two patients treated with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (P = 0.021). Conclusions: The endoscopic findings and therapy methods differ between patients with EoE and EoEM based on the esophageal motility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To date, there are several advanced methods for diagno­sing esophageal and gastric disorders that are actively used in clinical practice, among which high-resolution (HR) manometry stands out. This innovative study provides an opportunity to assess in detail the functional state of the esophagus, in particular the coordination of muscle contractions during swallowing and the function of the lower esophageal sphincter. HR manometry is an effective tool for detecting motility disorders such as achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diffuse esophageal spasm, as well as other functio­nal disorders that can affect the process of swallowing and moving food through the esophagus. One of the main advantages of HR manometry is accurate diagnosis of functional esophageal disorders due to the use of special catheters with numerous sensors located at a short distance from each other (about 1 cm). This allows you to create detailed topographic maps of pressure in the esophagus, which show the contraction of its muscles in real time. Thanks to this high resolution, it is possible to detect even minor motility disorders that previously went unnoticed when using traditional diagnostic methods. HR manometry has significantly improved the diagnosis of achalasia due to the ability to clearly identify three subtypes of this disease (classic achalasia, pan-esophageal pressure, and spastic achalasia). This allows doctors not only to make a more accurate diagnosis, but also to choose the optimal treatment strategy adapted to the specific type of disorder. In case of gastroesopha­geal reflux disease, HR manometry helps assess the function of the lower esophageal sphincter and diaphragm, which is important for detecting diaphragmatic weakness, which is one of the main causes of pathological reflux. In addition, this method makes it possible to diagnose concomitant peristalsis disorders that affect the ability of the esophagus to clear from acid reflux, thereby helping doctors better understand the mechanism of the disease and prescribe more effective treatment. Thus, HR manometry has a key place among modern methods for diagnosing esophageal disorders, allowing not only to accurately detect motility disorders, but also to optimize treatment. This significantly improves patients’ quality of life, as it helps doctors choose the most effective therapeutic strategies based on accurate data about esophageal function.

Abstract Striated esophageal muscle contraction (SEC) is important for pharyngeal swallowing and deglutition augmentation against aspiration. Its clinical relevance is unclear in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). In this study, we aimed to characterize and compare SEC in consecutive patients with and without IEM. All eligible patients were evaluated for SEC, primary and secondary peristalsis using high‐resolution manometry (HRM) with one mid‐esophageal injection port. Primary peristalsis was assessed with 10 5‐mL liquid swallows and multiple rapid swallows (MRS), while secondary peristalsis was performed with rapid air injections of 20 mL. All peristatic parameters of HRM were measured, and SEC and its contractile integral (SECI) were evaluated. One hundred and forty patients (59.3% women, mean age 46.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. There was no difference in SECI between patients with and without IEM (p = 0.91). SECI was also similar between patients with and without secondary peristalsis for IEM (p = 0.63) or normal motility (p = 0.80). No difference in SECI was seen between patients with and without MRS for IEM (p = 0.55) or normal motility (p = 0.88). SECI was significantly higher in male patients than female patients in IEM patients (p = 0.01). SECI significantly correlated with age in patients with normal motility (r = −0.31, p = 0.01). Aging may have a negative impact on SEC in patients with normal motility, while gender difference in SECI occurs in IEM patients. Neither secondary peristalsis nor MRS influences SECI.

ABSTRACT Background Methods Key Results Conclusion The shear rheology of ingested fluids influences their pharyngo‐esophageal transit during deglutition. Thus, swallowed fluids elicit differing physiological responses due to their shear‐thinning profile.Two hydrocolloid fluids, xanthan gum (XG) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose gum (CMC), were compared in 10 healthy adults (mean age 39 years). Manometry swallowing assessments were performed using an 8‐French catheter. Swallows were analyzed using the Swallow Gateway web application (www.swallowgateway.com). Grouped data were analyzed by a mixed statistical model. The coefficient of determination (r2) assessed the relationship between measures and bolus viscosity (SI units, mPa.s) at shear rates of 1—1000 s−1.Rheology confirmed that the thickened fluids had similar viscosities at 50 s−1 shear rate (XG IDDSI Level‐1, 2, and 3 respectively, 74.3, 161.2, and 399.6 mPa.s vs. CMC Level‐1, 2, and 3 respectively 78.0, 176.5, and 429.2 mPa.s). However, at 300 s−1 shear, CMC‐thickened fluids exhibited approximately double the viscosity (XG Level‐1, 2, and 3 respectively 19.5, 34.4, and 84.8 mPa.s vs. CMC Level‐1, 2, and 3 respectively, 41.3, 80.8, and 160.2 mPa.s). In vivo swallows of CMC, when compared to XG, showed evidence of greater flow resistance, such as increased intrabolus pressure (p < 0.01) and UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure (UESIRP, p < 0.01) and shorter UES Relaxation Time (p < 0.05) and Bolus Presence Time (p < 0.001). The apparent fluid viscosity (mPa.s) correlated most significantly with increasing UESIRP (r2 0.69 at 50 s−1 and r2 0.97 at 300 s−1, p < 0.05).Fluids with divergent shear viscosities demonstrated differences in pharyngeal function. These physiological responses were linked to the shear viscosity and not the IDDSI level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Capsaicin‐containing red pepper sauce suspension augments esophageal contraction amplitude on conventional manometry. This study used high‐resolution manometry (HRM) to investigate if capsaicin infusion modulates segmental esophageal smooth muscle peristalsis in healthy adults. Methods: Sixteen healthy volunteers (mean age 37 years, 14 male) underwent HRM for the evaluation of primary peristalsis and secondary peristalsis using slow and rapid air distensions. Both primary and secondary peristalsis were assessed following infusions of capsaicin‐containing red pepper sauce and saline. Key Results: Capsaicin infusion significantly increased heartburn symptoms compared to saline infusion (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased threshold volumes of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions (p = 0.02). The frequency of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions was significantly increased by capsaicin infusion (p = 0.03). Neither capsaicin infusion (p = 0.06) nor saline infusion (p = 0.27) altered threshold volume during slow air distensions. Capsaicin infusion significantly increased distal contractile integral (DCI) of primary peristalsis (p = 0.04), particularly in the proximal smooth muscle segment (p = 0.048). It enhanced secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions (p = 0.003) but not during slow air distension (p = 0.23). Saline infusion significantly increased DCI of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distension (p = 0.01). Conclusions and Inferences: Augmentation of distension‐induced secondary peristalsis can be modulated by activation of capsaicin‐sensitive afferents similar to mechanosensitive afferents. Capsaicin‐induced augmentation of primary peristalsis isolates to the cholinergic‐mediated proximal smooth muscle segment, which warrants study in ineffective esophageal motility to determine therapeutic potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with pseudobulbar palsy often present with velopharyngeal incompetence. Velopharyngeal incompetence is usually observed during expiratory activities such as speech and/or blowing during laryngoscopy. These patients typically exhibit good velopharyngeal closure during swallowing, which is dissociated from expiratory activities. We named this phenomenon "speech-swallow dissociation" (SSD). SSD on endoscopic findings can help in diagnosing the underlying disease causing dysphagia. This endoscopic finding is qualitative, and the quantitative characteristics of SSD are still unclear. Accordingly, the current study aimed to quantitatively evaluate SSD in patients with pseudobulbar palsy. We evaluated velopharyngeal pressure during swallowing and expiratory activity in 10 healthy subjects and 10 patients with pseudobulbar palsy using high-resolution manometry, and compared the results between the two groups. No significant differences in maximal velopharyngeal contraction pressure (V-Pmax) were observed during dry swallowing between the pseudobulbar palsy group and healthy subjects (190.5 mmHg vs. 173.6 mmHg; P = 0.583). V-Pmax during speech was significantly decreased in the pseudobulbar palsy group (85.4 mmHg vs. 34.5 mmHg; P < 0.001). The degree of dissociation of speech to swallowing in V-Pmax, when compared across groups, exhibited a larger difference in the pseudobulbar palsy group, at 52% versus 80% (P = 0.001). Velopharyngeal pressure during blowing was similar to that during speech. Velopharyngeal closure in patients with pseudobulbar palsy exhibited weaker pressure during speech and blowing compared with swallowing, quantitatively confirming the presence of SSD. Pseudobulbar palsy often presents with SSD, and this finding may be helpful in differentiating the etiology of dysphagia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Absent contractility on high-resolution manometry (HRM) defines severe hypomotility but needs distinction from achalasia. We retrospectively identified achalasia within absent contractility using HRM provocative maneuvers, barium esophagography, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). METHODS: Adult patients with absent contractility on HRM during the 4-year study period were eligible for inclusion. Inadequate studies, achalasia after therapy, or prior foregut surgery were exclusions. Upright integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) >12mmHg, panesophageal pressurization, and/or elevated IRP on multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge (RDC) were considered abnormal. Esophageal barium retention and abnormal esophagogastric junction distensibility index (<2.0 mm²/mm Hg) on FLIP defined achalasia. Clinical, endoscopic, and motor characteristics of patients with achalasia were compared with absent contractility without obstruction. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 20 (12.2%) had achalasia (17.9%of 112 patients with adjunctive testing),while 92 did not, and 52 did not undergo adjunctive tests. Achalasia was diagnosed regardless of IRP value, but the median supine IRP was higher (odds ratio 1.196, 95% confidence interval 1.041-1.375, P = 0.012). Patients with achalasia were more likely to present with dysphagia (80.0% vs 35.9%, P < 0.001), with obstructive features on HRM maneuvers (83.3% vs 48.9%, P = 0.039), but lower likelihood of GERD evidence (20.0% vs 47.3%, P = 0.027) or large hiatus hernia (15.0% vs 43.8%, P = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, dysphagia presentation (P = 0.006) and pressurization on RDC (P = 0.027) predicted achalasia, while reflux and presurgical evaluations and lack of RDC obstruction predicted absent contractility without obstruction. DISCUSSION: Despite HRM diagnosis of absent contractility, achalasia is identified in more than 1 in 10 patients regardless of IRP value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The relationship between the metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) phenotype and the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and inefficient esophageal motility (IEM) is still unclear. Thus, we assessed the association between different metabolic obesity phenotypes and GERD and IEM using empirical data. Methods: We collected clinical and test data of 712 patients, including 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-h MII-pH) monitoring, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and endoscopy. We divided 567 individuals into four categories according to their metabolic obesity phenotype: metabolically unhealthy non-obesity (MUNO), metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO), metabolically healthy non-obesity (MHNO), and MHO. We compared differences in the 24-h MII-pH monitoring, HRM, and endoscopy findings among the four metabolic obesity phenotypes. Results: Patients with the MUNO, MHO, or MUO phenotype showed a greater risk of IEM and GERD (pathologic acid exposure time [AET] >6%) compared with patients with the MHNO phenotype. Regarding the HRM results, patients with the MHNO or MUNO phenotype had a lower integrated relaxation pressure, esophageal sphincter pressure, and esophagogastric junction contractile integral, and more ineffective swallows than patients with the MHO or MUO phenotype (p < 0.05). In terms of 24-h MII-pH, patients with the MHO or MUO phenotype had a higher total, upright, and supine AET; a higher total number of reflux episodes (TRs); and a lower mean nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index compared with those with the MHNO or MUNO phenotype (all p < 0.05). Considering the odds ratio of 19.086 (95% confidence interval 6.170–59.044) for pathologic AET and 3.659 (95% confidence interval 1.647–8.130) for IEM, patients with the MUO phenotype had the greatest risk after adjusting for all confounding variables. Conclusion: Obesity and metabolic disorders increase the risk of GERD and IEM. Obesity has a greater impact on esophageal dysmotility and pathologic acid exposure than metabolic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic BariClip gastroplasty (LBCG) is a new reversible bariatric procedure designed to replicate the restrictive effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) by placing a clip vertically on the stomach. This technique achieves gastric lumen restriction without the need for resection, ensuring organ preservation and reversibility. However, concerns have arisen regarding potential complications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), slippage, or erosion of the stomach. The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes and complications of LBCG. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study. We analyzed 149 patients who underwent LBCG procedure between July 2021 and November 2023. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was observed for all patients, recording clinically relevant GERD through GERD-Q score questionnaires. Weight loss was monitored through body mass index (BMI) and % total weight loss (%TWL), registered during follow-up visits. Results: Overall, 149 patients were eligible for this study. Overall complication rate was 8% (12/149). The average BMI went from 40 ± 4.37 kg/m2 to 28 ± 4.29 kg/m2 (p < 0.05) in 6 months, while the mean %TWL was 22.6% after at least 6 months of follow-up. Clinically relevant GERD went from 18.1% (27/149) to 10.7% (16/149), p = 0.1262. As expected, also the PPI usage was not altered significantly (17.8% vs 16.4%), p = 0.8714. Conclusions: LBCG remains an experimental procedure that must be approached with caution. Nonetheless, the potential of LBCG to reproduce the effects of LSG while reducing GERD makes it a promising new reversible option for the treatment of morbid obesity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the forces exerted on organs during swallowing, specifically focusing on identifying forces other than those resulting from direct organ contact. Using a swallowing simulator based on the moving particle method, we simulated the swallowing process of healthy individuals upon the ingestion of thickened foods, which were simulated as shear‐thinning flow without yield stress. We extracted the resultant force vectors acting on the organs and shape of the bolus at each time interval. The simulation results confirmed that the bolus originates from tongue movement and is transferred between the oral cavity and pharynx, with each organ's coordinated movements with the tongue occurring at their respective positions, as indicated by the balance of the resultant force vectors. Utilizing the information about the resultant force vectors obtained through simulations, we calculated the physical parameters of impulse, energy, and power. The variations in these physical parameters were aligned with the behaviors of both the biological system and the food bolus during swallowing. The force values calculated from the simulations closely approximate the theoretical values. Furthermore, the forces calculated from the simulations were relatively smaller than the force values derived from pressure information, such as that from high‐resolution manometry and tongue pressure sensors. This difference can be attributed to the simulations extracting only the forces exerted on the organ by the food bolus. Force information on organs has the potential to provide a new interpretation of conventional mechanical indicators such as manometry and tongue pressure sensors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To date, there are several advanced methods for diagnosing esophageal and gastric disorders that are actively used in clinical practice, among which high-resolution (HR) manometry stands out. This innovative study provides an opportunity to assess in detail the functional state of the esophagus, in particular the coordination of muscle contractions during swallowing and the function of the lower esophageal sphincter. HR manometry is an effective tool for detecting motility disorders such as achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diffuse esophageal spasm, as well as other functional disorders that can affect the process of swallowing and moving food through the esophagus. One of the main advantages of HR manometry is accurate diagnosis of functional esophageal disorders due to the use of special catheters with numerous sensors located at a short distance from each other (about 1 cm). This allows you to create detailed topographic maps of pressure in the esophagus, which show the contraction of its muscles in real time. Thanks to this high resolution, it is possible to detect even minor motility disorders that previously went unnoticed when using traditional diagnostic methods. HR manometry has significantly improved the diagnosis of achalasia due to the ability to clearly identify three subtypes of this disease (classic achalasia, pan-esophageal pressure, and spastic achalasia). This allows doctors not only to make a more accurate diagnosis, but also to choose the optimal treatment strategy adapted to the specific type of disorder. In case of gastroesophageal reflux disease, HR manometry helps assess the function of the lower esophageal sphincter and diaphragm, which is important for detecting diaphragmatic weakness, which is one of the main causes of pathological reflux. In addition, this method makes it possible to diagnose concomitant peristalsis disorders that affect the ability of the esophagus to clear from acid reflux, thereby helping doctors better understand the mechanism of the disease and prescribe more effective treatment. Thus, HR manometry has a key place among modern methods for diagnosing esophageal disorders, allowing not only to accurately detect motility disorders, but also to optimize treatment. This significantly improves patients’ quality of life, as it helps doctors choose the most effective therapeutic strategies based on accurate data about esophageal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Striated esophageal muscle contraction (SEC) is important for pharyngeal swallowing and deglutition augmentation against aspiration. Its clinical relevance is unclear in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). In this study, we aimed to characterize and compare SEC in consecutive patients with and without IEM. All eligible patients were evaluated for SEC, primary and secondary peristalsis using high‐resolution manometry (HRM) with one mid‐esophageal injection port. Primary peristalsis was assessed with 10 5‐mL liquid swallows and multiple rapid swallows (MRS), while secondary peristalsis was performed with rapid air injections of 20 mL. All peristatic parameters of HRM were measured, and SEC and its contractile integral (SECI) were evaluated. One hundred and forty patients (59.3% women, mean age 46.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. There was no difference in SECI between patients with and without IEM (p = 0.91). SECI was also similar between patients with and without secondary peristalsis for IEM (p = 0.63) or normal motility (p = 0.80). No difference in SECI was seen between patients with and without MRS for IEM (p = 0.55) or normal motility (p = 0.88). SECI was significantly higher in male patients than female patients in IEM patients (p = 0.01). SECI significantly correlated with age in patients with normal motility (r = −0.31, p = 0.01). Aging may have a negative impact on SEC in patients with normal motility, while gender difference in SECI occurs in IEM patients. Neither secondary peristalsis nor MRS influences SECI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, the incidence of achalasia has been increasing, but its cause remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the initial symptoms and the course of symptoms and to find new insights into the cause and course of the disease. Methods: Altogether, 136 patients diagnosed with achalasia by high-resolution manometry (HRM) were enrolled. Questionnaires and chart reviews were conducted to investigate the initial symptoms, time from onset to diagnosis, and comorbidities, as well as the relationship between HRM results, time to diagnosis, and symptom severity. Results: In total, 67 of 136 patients responded to the questionnaire. The median ages of onset and diagnosis were 42 and 58 years, respectively. The median time from onset to diagnosis was 78.6 months, with 25 cases (37.3%) taking > 10 years to be diagnosed. The symptom onset was gradual and sudden in 52 (77.6%) and 11 (16.4%) patients, respectively. Of the 11 patients with acute onset, three (27.3%) developed anhidrosis at the same time. There was no correlation between the time from onset to diagnosis and esophageal dilatation, resting LES pressure, or mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). No correlation was also found between the degree of symptoms and resting LES pressure or IRP. Conclusion: Esophageal achalasia can have acute or insidious onsets. This finding may help to elucidate the cause of achalasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The relationship between the metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) phenotype and the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and inefficient esophageal motility (IEM) is still unclear. Thus, we assessed the association between different metabolic obesity phenotypes and GERD and IEM using empirical data. Methods: We collected clinical and test data of 712 patients, including 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-h MII-pH) monitoring, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and endoscopy. We divided 567 individuals into four categories according to their metabolic obesity phenotype: metabolically unhealthy non-obesity (MUNO), metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO), metabolically healthy non-obesity (MHNO), and MHO. We compared differences in the 24-h MII-pH monitoring, HRM, and endoscopy findings among the four metabolic obesity phenotypes. Results: Patients with the MUNO, MHO, or MUO phenotype showed a greater risk of IEM and GERD (pathologic acid exposure time [AET] >6%) compared with patients with the MHNO phenotype. Regarding the HRM results, patients with the MHNO or MUNO phenotype had a lower integrated relaxation pressure, esophageal sphincter pressure, and esophagogastric junction contractile integral, and more ineffective swallows than patients with the MHO or MUO phenotype (p < 0.05). In terms of 24-h MII-pH, patients with the MHO or MUO phenotype had a higher total, upright, and supine AET; a higher total number of reflux episodes (TRs); and a lower mean nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index compared with those with the MHNO or MUNO phenotype (all p < 0.05). Considering the odds ratio of 19.086 (95% confidence interval 6.170–59.044) for pathologic AET and 3.659 (95% confidence interval 1.647–8.130) for IEM, patients with the MUO phenotype had the greatest risk after adjusting for all confounding variables. Conclusion: Obesity and metabolic disorders increase the risk of GERD and IEM. Obesity has a greater impact on esophageal dysmotility and pathologic acid exposure than metabolic diseases.

Abstract Background High-resolution manometry (HRM) can quantify swallowing pathophysiology to evaluate the status of the pharynx. Sequential 4-channel neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was recently developed based on the normal contractile sequences of swallowing-related muscles. This study aimed to examine the effects of sequential 4-channel NMES for compensatory application during swallowing and to observe the residual effects after the application of NMES using HRM. Results Sequential 4-channel NMES significantly improved the HRM parameters, with respect to the maximal pressure and area of the velopharynx (VP), maximal pressure and area of the mesopharynx (MP), and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) activation and nadir duration. Furthermore, the improvement in the pressure and area variables of the VP and MP showed a tendency to maintain even when measured after NMES, but there are no significant differences. Conclusions The present study suggests that the sequential 4-channel NMES application of the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles during swallowing improves the pressure, area, and time variables of the oropharynx, as measured by HRM, and it is likely that the effects may persist even after stimulation. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT02718963 (initial release: 03/20/2016, actual study completion date: 06/24/2016, last release: 10/20/2020).

Background and Aim: The measurement of esophageal acid exposure time (AET) using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII‐pH) tests is the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, this catheter‐based 24‐h test can cause considerable patient discomfort. Our aim is to identify factors affecting AET and to develop a scoring model for predicting AET abnormalities before conducting the MII‐pH test. Methods: Of the 366 patients who underwent MII‐pH test at two facilities in Japan and Vietnam, 255 patients who also had esophagogastroduodenoscopy and high‐resolution manometry were included in this study. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using risk factors for AET > 6% identified from a derivation cohort (n = 109). A scoring system predicting AET > 6% was then constructed and externally validated with a separate cohort (n = 146). Results: Three variables were derived from the prediction model: male gender, Hill grades III–IV, and weak mean distal contractile integrals. Based on these scores, patients were classified into low (0 point), intermediate (1–3 points), and high (4 points) risk groups. The probabilities of having an AET > 6% were 6%, 34%, and 100% for these groups, respectively. A score of < 1 excluded patients with abnormal AET, with a negative predictive value of 93.8% in the derivation cohort and 80.0% in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We derived and externally validated a prediction model for abnormal AET. This system could assist in guiding the appropriate treatment strategies for GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is often associated with dysphagia and esophageal dysmotility (ED). However, ED in patients with MSA is poorly understood. To assess the relationship between ED, dysphagia, and other clinical findings in such patients and investigate the details of ED in MSA using high-resolution manometry (HRM). Methods: Patients from The University of Tokyo Hospital with MSA who underwent swallowing examinations, esophagography, and HRM between 2017 and 2022 were enrolled. A retrospective chart review of patients' backgrounds, swallowing function, and esophageal motility was performed. ED was evaluated using the Chicago Classification version 4.0. Results: Seventy-four patients with MSA were identified. The median age was 64 years, 48 patients (65%) were male, and the cerebellar variant type was predominant (69%). Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure was observed in 34 patients (46%) and intraesophageal stasis in 65 (88%). High-severity MSA was a risk factor for developing dysphagia, vocal fold movement impairment, and abnormal UES function (p < 0.05). However, no overt clinical risk factors for ED were identified. Various types of ED were detected using HRM, and ineffective esophageal motility was the most frequent disorder. Conclusions: ED is a common occurrence in patients with MSA. Although a high-severity MSA may be a risk factor for developing dysphagia and vocal fold motion impairment, ED can occur regardless of clinical severity. Since ED is rarely detected based on subjective symptoms, careful evaluation of esophageal motility by esophagography or HRM is warranted in patients with MSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a heterogenous disorder in which the correct management strategy is unclear. We assessed whether functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography data could select EGJOO, which would benefit from lower esophageal sphincter Botulinum toxin (Botox) injection. Methods: This was a single‐center prospective study of adult patients meeting Chicago Classification (CC) v3.0 criteria for EGJOO. We assessed differences in pretreatment physiologic measurements on high‐resolution manometry (HRM) and FLIP and other relevant clinical variables in predicting Botox response (>50% in BEDQ at 2 months). Key Results: Sixty‐nine patients were included (ages 33–90, 73.9% female). Of these, 42 (61%) were Botox responders. Majority of physiologic measures on HRM and FLIP and esophageal emptying were not different based on Botox response. However, a spastic‐reactive (SR) FLIP contractile response (CR) pattern predicted a Botox response with OR 25.6 (CI 2.9–229.6) when compared to antegrade FLIP CR; and OR for impaired‐disordered/absent CR was 22.5 (CI 2.5–206.7). Logistic regression model using backward elimination (p value = 0.0001, AUC 0.79) showed that a SRCR or IDCR/absent response and the upright IRP predicted Botox response. Response rates in tiered diagnostic groups were: (i) CCv3.0 EGJOO (60.9%), (ii) CCv4.0 EGJOO (73.1%), (iii) CCv4.0 + FLIP REO (80%), (iv) CCv4.0, FLIP REO, and abnormal FLIP CR (84.2%), and (v) CCv4.0, FLIP REO, and SR FLIP CR (90%). Conclusions and Inferences: FLIP helps identify patients with EGJOO who are likely to response to LES Botox therapy. An abnormal FLIP contractile response pattern is the single‐most important predictor of a Botox response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Age‐related changes in the gastrointestinal system are common and may be influenced by physiological aging processes. To date, a comprehensive analysis of esophageal motor disorders in patients belonging to various age groups has not been adequately reported. Methods: We conducted a retrospective assessment of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) studies in a multicenter setting. HRM parameters were evaluated according to the Chicago Classification version 4.0. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical data, and main manometric parameters, were collected at the time of the examination. Age groups were categorized as early adulthood (<35 years), early middle‐age (35–49 years), late middle‐age (50–64 years), and late adulthood (≥65 years). Results: Overall, 1341 patients (632, 47.0% male) were included with a median age of 55 years. Late adulthood patients reported more frequently dysphagia (35.2%) than early adulthood patients (24.0%, p = 0.035), early middle‐age patients (21.0%, p < 0.0001), and late middle‐aged patients (22.7%, p < 0.0001). Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction was more prevalent in late adulthood (16.7%) than in early adulthood (6.1%, p = 0.003), and in early middle‐age (8.1%, p = 0.001). Patients with normal esophageal motility were significantly younger (52.0 years) than patients with hypercontractile esophagus (61.5 years), type III achalasia (59.6 years), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (59.4 years), absent contractility (57.2 years), and distal esophageal spasm (57.0 years), in multivariate model (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The rate of esophageal motor disorders is higher in older patients, in particular esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm our results and to find tailored strategies to improve clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pathophysiology has been established in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, less is understood regarding the role the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) plays in preventing laryngopharynphageal reflux. Sustained UES basal pressure prevents reflux into the pharynx while allowing relaxation during ingestion. We investigate whether GERD influences UES function via HRM and pH Impedance testing. A retrospective analysis of 318 patients who underwent high‐resolution manometry with trans‐nasally placed manometric catheter and 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. One hundred and forty‐seven patients met Lyon consensus criteria for GERD based on acid exposure time >6%. The most common chief concern was heartburn or reflux, present in 59% of these patients. Upper esophageal sphincter basal and residual pressures were not significantly different between patients with GERD when compared to those without GERD, including a subanalysis of patients with extraesophageal symptoms. The LES basal and residual pressures, DCI and MNBI are statistically lower in patients with pathologic GERD. HRM and pH Impedance testing demonstrates no difference in UES basal and residual pressures based on pH diagnosis of GERD. We redemonstrate the association with hypotonic LES, diminished DCI and MNBI with GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The implications of impaired esophagogastric junction relaxation (i.e. esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalasia) in lung transplants recipients (LTRs) are unclear. Thus, we examined the prevalence and clinical outcomes of LTRs with an abnormally elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high-resolution manometry before lung transplantation (LTx). After IRB approval, we reviewed data on LTRs who underwent LTx between January 2019 and August 2022 with a preoperative median IRP >15 mmHg. Differences in overall survival and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)–free survival between LTRs with a normalized median IRP after LTx (N-IRP) and those with persistently high IRP (PH-IRP) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and the log-rank test. During the study period, 352 LTx procedures were performed; 44 (12.5%) LTRs had an elevated IRP before LTx, and 37 (84.1%) completed a postoperative manometry assessment (24 [70.6%] males; mean age, 65.2 ± 9.1 years). The median IRP before and after LTx was 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg and 12 ± 5.6 mmHg, respectively (P  < 0.001); the median IRP normalized after LTx in 24 (64.9%) patients. Two-year overall survival trended lower in the N-IRP group than the PH-IRP group (77.2% vs. 92.3%, P =  0.086), but CLAD-free survival (P =  0.592) and rates of primary graft dysfunction (P =  0.502) and acute cellular rejection (P =  0.408) were similar. An abnormally elevated IRP was common in LTx candidates; however, it normalized in roughly two-thirds of patients after LTx. Two-year survival trended higher in the PH-IRP group, despite similar rates of primary graft dysfunction and acute cellular rejection as well as similar CLAD-free survival between the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data are limited regarding gastrointestinal motility disturbance in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). This study aimed to characterize antroduodenal motor alterations in patients with high-resolution antroduodenal manometry (HR-ADM). HR-ADM was performed in patients with severe DGBI and compared with healthy volunteers (HV). HR-ADM used a commercially available probe composed of 36 electronic sensors spaced 1 cm apart and positioned across the pylorus. Antral and duodenal motor high-resolution profiles were analyzed, based on the frequency, amplitude, and contractile integral/sensor (CI/s) calculated for each phase of the migrating motor complex (MMC). Eighteen HV and 64 patients were investigated, 10 with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), 24 with functional dyspepsia (FD), 15 with overlap IBS-FD, and 15 with other DGBI. Compared with HV, patients had a lower frequency of phase II duodenal contractions (27 vs. 51 per hour; P ¼ 0.002) and a lower duodenal phase II contraction amplitude (70 vs. 100 mmHg; P ¼ 0.01), resulting in a lower CI/s of phase II (833 vs. 1,901 mmHg·cm·s; P < 0.001) in the duodenum. In addition, the frequency of phase II propagated antroduodenal contractions was lower (5 vs. 11 per hour; P < 0.001) in patients compared with HV. Interestingly, the antral CI/s of phase III was decreased in FD patients but not in IBS patients. Patients with severe DGBI display alterations in antral and intestinal motility assessed by commercially available HR-ADM. Whether these alterations may explain symptom profiles in such patients remains to be confirmed (NCT04918329 and NCT01519180). NEW & NOTEWORTHY Gastrointestinal dysmotility has been assessed poorly in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), especially with high-resolution antroduodenal manometry. Plots of DGBI patients showed lower duodenal contractions during phase II regarding amplitude, frequency, and contractile integral/sensor (CI/s) compared with healthy volunteers. A lower frequency of propagated antroduodenal contractions was also reported. Finally, antral CI/s was lower in patients with functional dyspepsia during phase III. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical significance of these alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, and more than 80% of PD patients will develop oropharyngeal dysphagia. Despite its striated histology, proximity to airway, and potential negative impact of its dysfunction on bolus transport and airway safety, the contractile function of the striated esophagus in PD patients has not been systematically studied. Methods: Using our repository of clinical manometry and the Milwaukee ManoBank, we analyzed high‐resolution manometry (HRM) studies of 20 PD patients, mean age 69.1 (range 38–87 years); 30 non‐PD patients with dysphagia, mean age 64.0 (44–86 years); and 32 healthy volunteers, mean age 65.3 (39–86 years). Patients with abnormal findings based on Chicago Classification 4.0 were identified. Repeat analysis was performed in 20% of the manometric tracings by a different investigator with inter‐rater concordance between 0.91 and 0.99. Key Results: The striated esophageal contractile integral in PD patients was significantly lower than that in non‐PD dysphagic patients and healthy controls (p = 0.03 and <0.01, respectively). This significant difference persisted after excluding patients with concurrent Chicago Classification motility disorders (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). In both analyses, the distal esophageal contractile integral did not show any significant difference between groups (p = 0.58 and 0.93, respectively). Conclusions & Inferences: PD is associated with a significant decrease in striated esophagus contractility compared to non‐PD and healthy controls. This finding may play a pathophysiologic role in development of dysphagia in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been many reports of normative pharyngeal swallowing pressures using high-resolution pharyngeal manometry, but there is a fair amount of between-subject variance in reported pressure parameters. The purpose of this study was to put forward normative pharyngeal high-resolution manometry measures across the lifespan and investigate the effects of age, size of system, and sex. High-resolution pharyngeal manometry was performed on 98 healthy adults (43 males) between the ages 21 and 89. Pressure duration, maxima, integral, and within-individual variability metrics were averaged over 10 swallows of 10-ml thin liquid. Multiple linear and logistic regressions with model fitting were used to examine how pharyngeal pressures relate to age, pharyngeal size, and sex. Age was associated with tongue base maximum pressure, tongue base maximum variability, and upper esophageal sphincter-integrated relaxation pressure (F3,92 = 6.69; p < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 0.15). Pharyngeal area during bolus hold was associated with velopharynx integral (F1,89 = 5.362; p = 0.02; adjusted R2 = 0.05), and there was no significant model relating pharyngeal pressures to C2–C4 length (p < 0.05). Sex differences were best described by tongue base integral and hypopharynx maximum variability (χ2 = 10.27; p = 0.006; pseudo R2 = 0.14). Normative data reveal the distribution of swallow pressure metrics which need to be accounted for when addressing dysphagia patients, the importance of pressure interactions in normal swallow, and address the relative stability of swallow metrics with normal aging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In pharyngeal dysphagia, poor pharyngeal contraction and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysfunction result in post‐swallow saliva residue (SR). This study aimed to clarify the relationship between swallowing pressure and SR in the valleculae and piriform sinuses on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Methods: Pharyngeal dysphagia patients with Wallenberg syndrome were included. Amounts of post‐swallow SR in the valleculae and piriform sinuses were classified into four grades using SR scores based on FEES. The Hyodo score was also calculated to evaluate swallowing function. High‐resolution manometric data in the nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, oro‐hypopharyngeal, and UES zones on swallowing were obtained for comparison with SR and Hyodo scores. Results: Of the 31 recruited, data from 26 patients who successfully underwent FEES and manometry were analyzed. Vallecular SR scores were strongly negatively correlated with a maximum pressure of the oropharynx (r = −0.52, p = 0.006), distal contractile integrals (DCI) of the oropharynx (r = −0.52, p = 0.007), and DCI of the oro‐hypopharynx (r = −0.55, p = 0.004). Hyodo scores for parameters 1 and 4 (corresponding to salivary pooling and pharyngeal clearance, respectively) were strongly negatively correlated with a maximum hypopharyngeal pressure (r = −0.57, p = 0.002) and strongly positively correlated with peristaltic velocity (r = 0.53, p = 0.007), respectively. SR scores and Hyodo scores related to SR were not correlated with pressure data of the UES. Conclusion: Manometric analysis of our SR scoring method using FEES revealed that a higher amount of SR in the valleculae, but not in the piriform sinuses, is associated with weaker pharyngeal pressure in pharyngeal dysphagia, especially at the oropharyngeal level. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3519–3526, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High-resolution manometry (HRM) can quantify swallowing pathophysiology to evaluate the status of the pharynx. Sequential 4-channel neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was recently developed based on the normal contractile sequences of swallowing-related muscles. This study aimed to examine the effects of sequential 4-channel NMES for compensatory application during swallowing and to observe the residual effects after the application of NMES using HRM. Results: Sequential 4-channel NMES significantly improved the HRM parameters, with respect to the maximal pressure and area of the velopharynx (VP), maximal pressure and area of the mesopharynx (MP), and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) activation and nadir duration. Furthermore, the improvement in the pressure and area variables of the VP and MP showed a tendency to maintain even when measured after NMES, but there are no significant differences. Conclusions: The present study suggests that the sequential 4-channel NMES application of the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles during swallowing improves the pressure, area, and time variables of the oropharynx, as measured by HRM, and it is likely that the effects may persist even after stimulation. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT02718963 (initial release: 03/20/2016, actual study completion date: 06/24/2016, last release: 10/20/2020). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is common in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and can be associated with poor esophageal contraction reserve on multiple rapid swallows. Alterations in the esophageal microbiome have been reported in GERD, but the relationship to presence or absence of contraction reserve in IEM patients has not been evaluated. We aim to investigate whether contraction reserve influences esophageal microbiome alterations in patients with GERD and IEM. Methods: We prospectively enrolled GERD patients with normal endoscopy and evaluated esophageal motility and contraction reserve with multiple rapid swallows during high-resolution manometry. The esophageal mucosa was biopsied for DNA extraction and 16S ribosomal RNA gene V3-V4 (Illumina)/full-length (Pacbio) amplicon sequencing analysis. Results: Among the 56 recruited patients, 20 had normal motility (NM), 19 had IEM with contraction reserve (IEM-R), and 17 had IEM without contraction reserve (IEM-NR). Esophageal microbiome analysis showed a significant decrease in microbial richness in patients with IEM-NR when compared to NM. The beta diversity revealed different microbiome profiles between patients with NM or IEM-R and IEM-NR (P = 0.037). Several esophageal bacterial taxa were characteristic in patients with IEM-NR, including reduced Prevotella spp. and Veillonella dispar, and enriched Fusobacterium nucleatum. In a microbiome-based random forest model for predicting IEM-NR, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 was yielded. Conclusions: In symptomatic GERD patients with normal endoscopic findings, the esophageal microbiome differs based on contraction reserve among IEM. Absent contraction reserve appears to alter the physiology and microbiota of the esophagus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 4th iteration of the Chicago Classification (CC v4.0) for esophageal motility disorders offers more restrictive criteria for the diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM) compared to version 3.0 (CC v3.0). In light of the updated criteria for IEM, we aimed to characterize and compare the patients who retained their IEM diagnosis to those who were reclassified as normal motility, and to evaluate the clinical impact of the newly introduced CC v4.0. We performed a retrospective case–control study. We included all individuals who underwent a high-resolution manometry (HRM) between 2020 and 2021 at two centers. Consecutive studies reported as IEM according to the CC v3.0 were reanalyzed according to the CC v4.0. We compared demographics, clinical, manometry, and pH-monitoring parameters. Out of 452 manometry studies, 154 (34%) met criteria for IEM as per the CC v3.0 (CC v3.0 IEM group). Of those, 39 (25%) studies were reclassified as normal studies according to the CC v4.0 (CC v4.0 normal group), while the remaining 115 studies (25% of the overall cohort) retained an IEM diagnosis (CC v4.0 IEM group). The CC v4.0 normal group had more recovered contractions during solid swallows (p = 0.01), less ineffective swallows (p = 0.04), and lower acid exposure time (p = 0.02) compared to the CC4.0 IEM group. Under CC v4.0 criteria, fewer patients are diagnosed with IEM. Those diagnosed with IEM had worse esophageal function and higher acid burden. Though further studies are needed to confirm these findings, our results indicate that CC v4.0 criteria restrict the IEM diagnosis to a more clinically meaningful population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is the high-pressure zone marking the transition between the hypopharynx and esophagus. There is limited research surrounding the resting UES using pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and existing normative data varies widely. This study describes the manometric representation of the resting UES using a clinically accessible method of measurement. Data were obtained from 87 subjects in a normative database of pharyngeal HRM with simultaneous videofluoroscopy. The resting UES manometric region was identified and ten measurement segments of this region were taken throughout the duration of the study using the Smart Mouse function within the manometry software. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to analyze within-subject reliability across measurements. Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze how subject characteristics and manometric conditions influence resting UES pressure. There was excellent within-subject reliability between resting UES mean pressures (ICC = 0.96). In bivariate analysis, there were significant effects of age, number of sensors contained within the resting UES, and preceding swallow volume on mean resting UES pressure. For every 1 unit increase in age, there was a 0.19 unit decrease in resting UES pressure (p = 0.008). For every 1 unit increase in number of sensors contained within the resting UES, there was a 3.71 unit increase in resting UES pressure (p < 0.001). This study presents normative data for the resting UES, using a comprehensive and clinically accessible protocol that can provide standard comparison for the study of populations with swallowing disorders, particularly UES dysfunction, and provides support for UES-directed interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The sequential generation of swallowing pressure (SP) from the nasopharynx to the proximal esophagus is important for the bolus to pass from the oral cavity to the esophagus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of the SP sequence mode on high‐resolution manometry (HRM) with oral intake difficulty and aspiration pneumonia. Methods: Consecutive patients with dysphagia who were admitted to our dysphagia clinic between November 2016 and November 2020 were enrolled in this cross‐sectional study. We classified the HRM pressure topography data according to the SP sequence mode into type A, normal; B, partially decreased; C, totally decreased; and D, sequence disappeared, and according to the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during pharyngeal swallowing into type 1, flattening and 2, non‐flattening. Clinical dysphagia severity was determined based on oral intake difficulty and aspiration pneumonia. Results: In total, 202 patients with dysphagia (mean [standard deviation] age, 68.3 [14.5] years; 140 [69.8%] male) were enrolled. Type C (odds ratio [OR], 10.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.89–51.45), type D (OR, 19.90; 95% CI, 4.18–122.35), and type 2 (OR, 6.36; 95% CI, 2.88–14.57) were significantly related to oral intake difficulty. Type C (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.08–11.12) and type 2 (OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.95–9.15) were significantly associated with aspiration pneumonia. Conclusion: The failure of sequential generation of SP was associated with higher risk of oral intake difficulty and aspiration pneumonia. These assessments are useful in understanding the pathophysiology and severity of dysphagia and in selecting safety nutritional management methods. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2127–2135, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is little information on the degree of concordance between the results obtained using the Chicago 3.0 (CCv3.0) and Chicago 4.0 (CCv4.0) protocols to interpret high-resolution manometry (HRM) seeking to determine the value provided by the new swallowing maneuvers included in the last protocol. This is a study of diagnostic tests, evaluating concordance by consistency between the results obtained by the CCv3.0 and CCv4.0 protocols, in patients undergoing HRM. Concordance was assessed with the kappa test. Bland–Altman scatter plots, and Lin's correlation-concordance coefficient (CCC) were used to assess the agreement between IRP measured with swallows in the supine and seated position or with solid swallows. One hundred thirty-two patients were included (65% women, age 53 ± 17 years). The most frequent HRM indication was dysphagia (46.1%). Type I was the most common type of gastroesophageal junction. The most frequent CCv4.0 diagnoses were normal esophageal motility (68.9%), achalasia (15.5%), and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM; 5.3%). The agreement between the results was substantial (Kappa 0.77 ± 0.05), with a total agreement of 87.9%. Diagnostic reclassification occurred in 12.1%, from IEM in CCv3.0 to normal esophageal motility in CCv4.0. Similarly, there was a high level of agreement between the IRP measured in the supine compared to the seated position (CCC0.92) and with solid swallows (CCC0.96). In conclusion, the CCv4.0 protocol presents a high concordance compared to CCv3.0. In the majority of manometric diagnoses there is no reclassification of patients with provocation tests. However, the more restrictive criteria of CCv4.0 achieve a better reclassification of patients with IEM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High‐resolution manometry (HRM) is performed for evaluation of esophageal symptoms, but patient outcome is unclear when no actionable motor disorder is identified. We evaluated long‐term symptomatic outcome of patients with nonactionable HRM findings. Methods: Patients who underwent (HRM) studies in 2006–2008 were tracked. Patients with achalasia spectrum disorders, foregut surgery before or after HRM, and incomplete symptom documentation were excluded. Symptom questionnaires assessing dominant symptom intensity (DSI, product of symptom severity and frequency recorded on 5‐point Likert scales) and global symptom severity (GSS, from 10 cm visual analog scale) were repeated. Change in symptom burden was compared against HRM motor findings using Chicago Classification 4.0 (CCv4.0), applied retroactively to 2006–2008 data. Key Results: Overall, 134 patients (median age 68 years, 64.5% female) could be contacted. The majority (73.1%) had normal motility; others had ineffective esophageal motility (8.2%), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (13.4%), hypercontractile esophagus (3.0%), or absent contractility (2.2%), none managed invasively. Over 15 years of follow‐up, DSI decreased from 8.0 (4.0–16.0) to 1.0 (0.0–6.0) (p < 0.001) and GSS improved from 5.5 (3.3–7.7) to 2.0 (0.0–4.0) (p < 0.001); improvement was consistent across CCv4.0 diagnoses and subgroups. The majority (82.8%) reported improvement over time, and antisecretory medication was the most effective intervention (83.0% improvement). There was no difference in medication efficacy (p = 0.75) or improvement in symptoms (p = 0.20) based on CCv4 diagnosis. Conclusions and Inferences: Esophageal symptoms improve with conservative symptomatic management over long‐term follow‐up when no conclusive obstructive motor disorders or achalasia spectrum disorders are found on HRM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysphagia is a common symptom with significant impact on quality of life. Our diagnostic armamentarium was primarily limited to endoscopy and barium esophagram until the advent of manometric techniques in the 1970s, which provided the first reliable tool for assessment of esophageal motor function. Since that time, significant advances have been made over the last 3 decades in our understanding of various esophageal motility disorders due to improvement in diagnostics with high-resolution esophageal manometry. High-resolution esophageal manometry has improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia and has also enhanced our understanding of spastic and hypomotility disorders of the esophageal body. In this review, we discuss the current approach to diagnosis and therapeutics of various esophageal motility disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chicago Classification has standardized clinical approach to primary esophageal motility disorders. With new clinical data and advancing treatments, Chicago Classification has undergone multiple revisions to reflect updated findings and enhance diagnostic accuracy. This review will describe the recently published Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0), which aimed to enhance diagnostic characterization and limit overdiagnosis of inconclusive esophageal motility diagnoses. RECENT FINDINGS: Key revisions outlined in CCv4.0 include (1) a modified standardized HRM study protocol performed in supine and upright positions, (2) recommended ancillary testing and manometric provocation for inconclusive manometric diagnoses (3) the required presence of obstructive symptoms for conclusive diagnoses of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, distal esophageal spasm and hypercontractile esophagus, and (4) requirement of confirmatory testing for esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. These key modifications aim to improve diagnostic accuracy and consistency of clinically relevant esophageal motility disorders, and subsequently clinical outcomes.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) facilitates the detailed evaluation of esophageal motility. In December 2020, Chicago classification (CC) version 4.0 introduced modifications to improve consistency and accuracy. We conducted this study to compare the differences in the interpretations of HRM examinations between CC 3.0 and 4.0. Consecutive HRM records at a Taiwan tertiary medical center, including wet swallows and MRS performed in both supine and sitting positions from October 2019 to May 2021, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using both CC versions 3.0 and 4.0. A total of 105 patients were enrolled, and 102 patients completed the exam, while three could not tolerate HRM sitting up. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (n = 65, 63.7%) and dysphagia (n = 37, 36.3%) were the main indications. A total of 18 patients (17.6%) were reclassified to new diagnoses using CC 4.0. Of the 11 patients initially diagnosed with absent contractility, 3 (27.3%) were reclassified as having Type 1 achalasia. Of the 18 patients initially diagnosed with IEM, 6 (33.3%) were reclassified as normal. The incidence of diagnosis changes was similar in both the dysphagia and refractory GERD symptoms groups (21.6% versus 15.3%, p = 0.43). The use of CC 4.0 led to changes in the diagnoses of esophageal motility disease, irrespective of examination indications. Early adoption improves the accuracy of diagnoses and affects patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Delayed gastric emptying (GE) has been associated with antral and pyloric dysmotility. We aimed to characterize differences in the antral, duodenal, and pyloric motility profiles associated with delayed GE, using high-resolution antropyloroduodenal manometry (HR-ADM). Patients referred for HR-ADM for dyspeptic symptoms performed a concurrent GE breath test (NCT01519180 and NCT04918329). HR-ADM involved 36 sensors 1 cm apart, placed across the pylorus. Interdigestive and postprandial periods were identified. Antral, pyloric, and duodenal motor profiles were analyzed recording the frequency, amplitude, and propagative nature of contractions for each period. Plots of patients with normal and delayed GE were compared. Sixty patients underwent both HR-ADM and GE tests. Twenty-five and 35 patients had delayed and normal GE, respectively. Antral and duodenal motor profiles were not different between the two groups during the interdigestive period. During the postprandial period, a lower frequency of antral contractions was associated with delayed GE (2.22 vs. 1.39 contractions/min; P = 0.002), but no difference in mean contraction amplitude was observed. The pyloric region was identified in all the patients and pylorospasms, defined as 3 min of repeated isolated pyloric contractions, were more frequent in patients with delayed GE (32.0% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.02) during the postprandial period. No difference in duodenal contraction profiles was observed. Manometric profile alterations were observed in 72% of the patients with delayed GE, with 56% having a low frequency of antral contractions. Using HR-ADM, patients with delayed GE displayed different postprandial antropyloric motility as compared with patients with normal GE. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: High-resolution antropyloroduodenal manometry (HR-ADM) allows precise characterization of antral, pyloric, and duodenal motility, although its association with gastric emptying (GE) has been poorly investigated. Concurrent HRADM with GE measurement showed a lower frequency of antral postprandial contractions and an increased frequency of postprandial pylorospasms in patients with delayed GE. HR-ADM could, therefore, be useful in the future to better select patients for treatments targeting the pylorus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) severity increases with esophageal body hypomotility, but the impact of Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0 criteria on GERD diagnosis is incompletely understood. METHODS: In patients with GERD evaluated with high-resolution manometry and pH-impedance monitoring, CCv3.0 and CCv4.0 diagnoses were compared. RESULTS: In 247 patients, hypomotility diagnosis decreased from 45.3% (CCv3.0) to 30.0% (CCv4.0, P< 0.001). In contrast, within patients with ineffective esophageal motility, proportions with pathological acid exposure increased from 38% (CCv3.0) to 88% (CCv4.0); baseline impedance and esophageal clearance demonstrated similar findings (P< 0.05 for each comparison). DISCUSSION: CCv4.0 hypomotility criteria are more specific in supporting GERD evidence compared with CCv3.0. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pre-operative evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) includes assessment of esophageal motility. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard; endoscopic impedance planimetry (IP) with Endoflip 2.0 is increasingly utilized in esophageal disorders of motility. We hypothesized that normal IP motility would correlate with normal HRM motility and tested this in a prospective cohort study. Methods: Patients presenting for surgical evaluation of GERD between 9/2020 and 10/2021 were prospectively enrolled under an IRB-approved protocol. Patients with prior esophageal/gastric surgery, known motility disorders, or large paraesophageal hernias were excluded. All underwent HRM and IP, with normal motility defined by Chicago 3.0 classification for HRM and the presence of repetitive antegrade contractions for IP. Logistic regression and t test were used to analyze the data; p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 63 patients enrolled, 48 completed both IP and HRM testing. The cohort was 50% male with a median age of 52.5 [42.0, 66.0] years, mostly ASA class 1–2 (75.1%, n = 36) and had an average BMI of 31.4 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Normal motility tracings were in 62.5% of IP and 75% of HRM tests. Using HRM as the gold standard, IP detected normal motility with a sensitivity of 65.8% and a specificity of 50% (positive predictive value 83.3%, negative predictive value 27.8%). Normal IP was not statistically significant in predicting normal HRM (OR 3.182, 95% CI 0.826–12.262, p = 0.0926). Tolerability of IP was significantly better than HRM with lower rates of discomfort (10.9% vs. 93.4%, p < 0.0001) and higher willingness to repeat testing (100% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Esophageal motility testing with Endoflip 2.0 is well tolerated by patients. The low specificity (50%), poor negative predictive value (27.8%), and lack of statistically significant concordance between IP and HRM raises concern for the reliability of this test as a stand-alone replacement for HRM in the pre-operative evaluation for GERD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypercontractile esophagus (HE) is a disorder of increased esophageal body contractile strength on high‐resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Compartmentalized pressurization (CP) is a pattern with an isobaric contour of >30 mmHg extending from the contractile front to the lower esophageal sphincter on HREM. The relevance of CP to HE has yet to be explored. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 830 HREM studies of patients to identify HE. HE patients' CP status and symptoms by Eckardt score (ES) were reviewed. Diagnoses were made using Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0. Key Results: Forty‐seven patients (5.6%) were identified as having HE by CCv3, 30 (3.6%) of which had HE by CCv4. 11/30 HE patients had CP, and 19/30 did not. CP was associated with chronic opioid use (36.4% vs. 5.3% p = 0.047). Presenting ES was greater for HE patients with CP (7 vs. 4). Seven HE patients with CP and 11 without CP were managed medically. ES after medical therapy was higher in HE patients with CP compared to those without CP (9 vs. 0). No HE patients with CP responded to medical therapy. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significance of this association over time. 83% of all HE patients had all‐cause symptom remission. Conclusions & Inferences: HE patients with CP are associated with a higher presenting ES. HE patients with CP do not respond to medical therapy, while HE patients without CP frequently do respond. CP in HE may have prognostic value in determination of treatment strategy for patients with HE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]