Search

Introduction: The issue of whether integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) may confer a higher risk of paradoxical tuberculosis-related immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) compared with other classes of antiretroviral in people with HIV with a profound level of immunosuppression remains insufficiently explored. We aimed to assess whether such a higher risk exists by examining a cohort of patients with TB-HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Hong Kong., Methods: This was a retrospective review of 133 patients registered in the TB-HIV Registry of the Department of Health during the period 2014-2021., Results: Sixteen of 70 patients (22.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.0-32.7) and 14 of 63 patients (22.2%; 95% CI 12.0-32.5) from the INSTI and non-INSTI groups experienced TB-IRIS (p = 0.920). The median intervals between ART initiation and IRIS among patients from the two groups were similar (3 weeks [interquartile range IQR 2.0-7.8] vs. 4 weeks [IQR 2.0-5.1], p = 0.620). The proportion of patients requiring steroid therapy were similar, as were the hospitalization rates. There was no IRIS-related death in either group. The risk of TB-IRIS with INSTI versus non-INSTI was also similar in a stratified analysis in a subgroup of patients with a baseline CD4 count of <50 μL (10/33 [30.3%; 95% CI 14.6-46.0] vs. 10/22 [45.5%; 95% CI 24.7-66.3], p = 0.252) and another subgroup of patients with ART initiated within 4 weeks of anti-TB treatment (10/26 [38.5%; 95% CI 19.8-57.2] vs. 10/23 [43.5%; 95% CI 23.2-63.7], p = 0.721)., Conclusion: Our cohort study did not offer support for an increased risk of TB-IRIS with INSTIs compared with non-INSTIs, even in severely immunocompromised people with HIV., (© 2024 British HIV Association.)

Body weight is influenced by an interplay of individual and environmental factors. In people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), weight is also influenced by disease status with loss accompanying disease progression that is reversed with effective antiretroviral therapy. Weight changes in comparative antiretroviral therapy trials differ by regimen, with greater gains observed with the integrase strand transfer inhibitors dolutegravir and bictegravir, particularly when coadministered with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, compared with regimens that include agents such as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate that attenuate weight gain. We review weight changes in major randomized trials of preexposure prophylaxis and initial and switch HIV therapy, highlighting the challenges to assessing the role of antiretroviral therapy in weight change. This examination forms the basis for a model that questions assumptions regarding an association between integrase strand transfer inhibitors and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate and excessive weight gain and calls for more careful consideration of these data when making HIV treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . D. A. W. has received honoraria for consultancy from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Theratechnologies, and EMD Serono. His institution has received grant funding to support his research from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck & Co. J. R. K. has served as a consultant to Gilead, Merck, Theratechnologies, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and has received research support from Gilead Sciences and Merck. P. E. S. has served as a scientific advisory board member/consultant for Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline/ViiV Healthcare, Merck & Co, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, He has received research support from Gilead Sciences, and GlaxoSmithKline/ViiV Healthcare. G. A. M. has received consultant fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Merck, and Theratechnologies. D. R. K. is a consultant to and received honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Roche, and ViiV Healthcare. He has received research support from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Merck & Co, and Roche and has provided expert testimony on behalf of Gilead Sciences and Janssen. G. M. has served as an advisor to Novartis and Ipsen Pharmaceuticals and a speaker for Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme UK, and ViiV Healthcare. L. K. is a scientific and/or medical consultant to Altimmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, Glyscend, Intellihealth, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sidekick Health, twenty30.health, and Xeno Biosciences. J. v. W. is employed by ViiV Healthcare. R. E. C. is employed by Merck & Co. C. C. is employed by Gilead Sciences. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Tesamorelin is the only FDA-approved therapy to treat abdominal fat accumulation in people with HIV (PWH). Phase III clinical trials were conducted prior to the introduction of integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), which are now a mainstay of HIV antiretroviral therapy., Design: We leveraged a randomized double-blind trial of 61 PWH and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin 2 mg once daily vs. identical placebo among participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline., Methods: In the parent clinical trial, visceral fat cross-sectional area, hepatic fat fraction, and trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, respectively, at baseline and 12 months. Metabolic and safety outcomes were compared between treatment arms., Results: Among 38 participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline, 15 individuals on tesamorelin and 16 individuals on placebo completed the 12-month study. Tesamorelin led to significant declines in visceral fat (median [interquartile range]: -25 [-93, -2] vs. 14 [3, 41] cm 2 , P  = 0.001), hepatic fat (-4.2% [-12.3%, -2.7%] vs. -0.5% [-3.9%, 2.7%], P  = 0.01), and trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio (-0.1 [-0.3, 0.0] vs. 0.0 [-0.1, 0.1], P  = 0.03). Tesamorelin was well tolerated with a similar frequency of adverse events, including hyperglycemia, between groups., Conclusions: The current analysis provides the first dedicated data on the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin among PWH on INSTI-based regimens. Despite the association of INSTI use with weight gain and adipose tissue dysfunction, tesamorelin had beneficial effects on body composition with no exacerbation of glycemic control., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are a commonly used antiretroviral therapy (ART) class in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and associated with weight gain. We studied the association of INSTI-based ART with systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP)., Methods: We recruited 50 people taking INSTI-based ART and 40 people taking non-INSTI-based ART with HIV and hypertension from the University of Alabama at Birmingham HIV clinic. Office BP was measured unattended using an automated (AOBP) device. Awake, asleep, and 24-hour BP were measured through ambulatory BP monitoring. Among participants with SBP ≥130 mm Hg or DBP ≥80 mm Hg on AOBP, sustained hypertension was defined as awake SBP ≥130 mm Hg or DBP ≥80 mm Hg., Results: Mean SBP and DBP were higher among participants taking INSTI- vs. non-INSTI-based ART (AOBP-SBP/DBP: 144.7/83.8 vs. 135.3/79.3 mm Hg; awake-SBP/DBP: 143.2/80.9 vs. 133.4/76.3 mm Hg; asleep-SBP/DBP: 133.3/72.9 vs. 120.3/65.4 mm Hg; 24-hour-SBP/DBP: 140.4/78.7 vs. 130.0/73.7 mm Hg). After multivariable adjustment, AOBP, awake, asleep, and 24-hour SBP were 12.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-20.1), 9.8 (95% CI 3.6-16.0), 10.4 (95% CI 2.0-18.9), and 9.8 (95% CI 4.2-15.4) mm Hg higher among those taking INSTI- vs. non-INSTI-based ART, respectively. AOBP, awake, asleep, and 24-hour DBP were 7.5 (95% CI 0.3-14.6), 6.1 (95% CI 0.3-11.8), 7.5 (95% CI 1.4-13.6), and 6.1 (95% CI 0.9-11.3) mm Hg higher among those taking INSTI- vs. non-INSTI-based ART after multivariable adjustment. All participants had SBP ≥130 mm Hg or DBP ≥80 mm Hg on AOBP and 97.9% and 65.7% of participants taking INSTI- and non-INSTI-based ART had sustained hypertension, respectively., Conclusions: INSTI-based ART was associated with higher SBP and DBP than non-INSTI-based ART., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives: Dolutegravir has been used as a first-line anti-human immunodeficiency virus drug because of its better efficacy compared with other counterpart medicines. However, making a unanimous decision on its use during pregnancy has become difficult for stakeholders following congenital anomalies reported with its use. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the risk of congenital anomalies in newborns exposed to dolutegravir-based-regimens compared with those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens during the antenatal period., Methods: An extensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 30 November, 2023. Studies reporting data on congenital anomalies following antenatal use of dolutegravir were included. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies was assessed using RoB2, ROBINS-I, and ROBINS-E tools, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed in 'RevMan 5.4.1' using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the 'Q' statistic and I 2 value. A sensitivity analysis was performed for higher heterogeneity/high-risk studies. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42023446374] a priori., Results: Of 26 eligible studies, 12 (six randomized controlled trials and six observational studies with a pooled sample of 32,617) were included in a meta-analysis and 14 in a qualitative synthesis only. The meta-analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of congenital anomalies between newborns exposed antenatally to dolutegravir-based regimen(s) and those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens [risk ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.53; p = 0.59]. Heterogeneity was moderate (I 2 = 47%). Pooled results for randomized controlled trials and observational studies separately and the sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity provided similar results., Conclusions: The risk of congenital anomalies was not significantly different between dolutegravir-based regimens and non-dolutegravir-based-regimens in newborns exposed during their antenatal period., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are associated with weight gain in people with HIV (PWH), but their impact on diabetes is unclear. We evaluated the association between switching from nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) or protease inhibitors (PI) to INSTI and incident diabetes., Design: Longitudinal cohort study., Methods: We included PWH aged ≥18 years from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort (2007-2023) without history of diabetes who had used NNRTI or PI for ≥180 days. We followed participants up to 10 years from HIV primary care visits where they switched to INSTI or continued NNRTI or PI. We estimated the hazard of incident diabetes associated with switching to INSTI using weighted Cox regression with robust variance estimator., Results: We included 2075 PWH who attended 22 116 visits where they continued NNRTI or PI and 631 visits where they switched to INSTI. Switching to INSTI was associated with a weighted hazard ratio (wHR) of 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-1.59] for incident diabetes. The association if no weight gain occurred during the first two years was not qualitatively different (wHR 1.22; 95% CI, 0.82-1.80). In a posthoc analysis, switching to INSTI conferred a significant wHR of 1.79 (95% CI, 1.13-2.84) for diabetes within the first two years but not after., Conclusions: Switching from NNRTI or PI to INSTI did not significantly increase overall diabetes incidence in PWH, although there may be elevated risk in the first two years. These findings can inform considerations when switching to INSTI-based regimens., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: This review aims to summarize recently published peer reviewed papers on the influence of treatment with Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (InSTI) in people with HIV (HIV) on metabolic health, including weight gain, lipid parameters, glucose homeostasis, and bone health., Recent Findings: InSTI have a mild/moderate effect on weight gain in both antiretroviral (ART) naïve and ART experienced PWH, which is more pronounced in certain groups (i.e. women, people of Black African ethnicity, those with lower socioeconomic status, and older people). The effect on weight is also driven by other components of the ART regimen as well as previous exposure to certain ART. InSTI have a relatively safe profile in terms of lipid parameters and bone health, compared to other ART classes, although some studies suggest a greater risk of insulin resistance and diabetes in PWH using InSTI, especially 2nd generation InSTI. While there is some evidence suggesting a negative impact of InSTI on some aspects of metabolic health (weight gain and glucose homeostasis), they remain the preferred treatment option for most PWH, due to their high efficacy and tolerability. However, an individualised approach to ART choice in PWH should be used in order to avoid negative outcomes in populations at higher risks of metabolic complications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy is the World Health Organization's preferred first-line regimen for all persons with HIV, including pregnant women. While DTG has been implicated as an obesogen associated with greater weight gain compared to other antiretrovirals, there is a paucity of data in pregnant women and their children. The Obesogenic oRigins of maternal and Child metabolic health Involving Dolutegravir (ORCHID) study is investigating associations between DTG, weight gain, and metabolic outcomes in the context of HIV., Materials & Methods: ORCHID is a prospective observational study taking place in Cape Town, South Africa (NCT04991402). A total of 1920 pregnant women with and without HIV infection are being followed from ≤18 weeks gestational age to 24 months postpartum with their children. Participants attend eleven study visits: 3 antenatal, delivery, and 7 postnatal visits. Several embedded sub-studies address specific scientific aims. Primary outcome measurements in mothers include anthropometry, blood pressure, body composition, dysglycemia, insulin resistance (IR), and dyslipidemia. Other maternal measures include demographics, resting energy expenditure, viral load, physical activity, dietary intake, hepatic steatosis, and repository specimens. Sub-study measurements include markers of adipose inflammation, gut integrity, and satiety/hunger, subcutaneous adipose tissue morphology and mitochondrial function, and metabolomics. Primary outcome measurements in children include anthropometry, adipose tissue mass, dysglycemia, IR, and dyslipidemia. Other variables include fetal growth, birth outcomes, medical/breastfeeding history, caloric intake, neurodevelopment, and repository specimens. Sub-study measurements include metabolites/lipid subspecies in umbilical cord blood, as well as breast milk composition and DTG exposure., Discussion: ORCHID will play a pivotal role in defining obesogenic mechanisms and clinical consequences of DTG use in pregnancy in women with HIV and their children. It will provide insights into metabolic disease risk reduction in the context of HIV/DTG, identify intervention targets, and inform public health approaches to diminish chronic metabolic co-morbidities for women and children., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Abrams et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

In 2018, a significant neural tube defects (NTD) signal was reported after pre-conceptional exposure to dolutegravir, but was not confirmed in further analysis. Since 2019, dolutegravir-based regimen, an integrase inhibitor (INI), is recommended by WHO as the most-effective first-line therapy in all patients living with HIV. To explore the potential INI-related teratogenic effect, we searched disproportionate signals between exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies, compared to non-INI drugs, using the international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase®. We selected all the reports registered in VigiBase® between 01/01/2007 and 30/03/2021 on any antiretroviral drug-related fetal or neonatal adverse drug reactions, declared either in children (<2 years) exposed in utero or in pregnant women (12-50 years). A case/non-case study was conducted to detected signals between congenital anomalies and prenatal exposure to any INI-class drug, compared to non-INI drugs, by estimating adjusted reporting odds ratios (aROR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). We identified 2521 unique reports, among which 664 (26.3%) were related to INI-class use. Overall, 520 congenital anomalies were cited from 327 unique reports, of whom 31.0% were INI-related. Compared to non-INI drugs, no significant disproportionate reporting signal between prenatal exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies was found (aROR 1.13; 95% CI:0.85-1.51). However, specific significant signals were reported for raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir drug exposure and urinary malformations (aROR 2.43; 95%CI:1.08-5.43), digestive malformations (aROR 3.09; 95%CI:1.22-7.84), and NTDs (aROR 3.02; 95%CI:1.09-8.37). Although specific congenital anomalies signals associated with raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir exposure were notified, causal relationship needs to be further investigated in prospective studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is currently used as first-line regimen to treat HIV infection. Despite its high efficacy and barrier to resistance, ART-associated neuropsychiatric adverse effects remain a major concern. Recent studies have identified a potential interaction between the INSTI, dolutegravir (DTG), and folate transport pathways at the placental barrier. We hypothesized that such interactions could also occur at the two major blood-brain interfaces: blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) and blood-brain barrier (BBB). To address this question, we evaluated the effect of two INSTIs, DTG and bictegravir (BTG), on folate transporters and receptor expression at the mouse BCSFB and the BBB in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. We demonstrated that DTG but not BTG significantly downregulated the mRNA and/or protein expression of folate transporters (RFC/SLC19A1, PCFT/SLC46A1) in human and mouse BBB models in vitro, and mouse brain capillaries ex vivo. Our in vivo study further revealed a significant downregulation in Slc19a1 and Slc46a1 mRNA expression at the BCSFB and the BBB following a 14-day DTG oral treatment in C57BL/6 mice. However, despite the observed downregulatory effect of DTG in folate transporters/receptor at both brain barriers, a 14-day oral treatment of DTG-based ART did not significantly alter the brain folate level in animals. Interestingly, DTG treatment robustly elevated the mRNA and/or protein expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl3, Il6, Il23, Il12) in primary cultures of mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (BBB). DTG oral treatment also significantly upregulated proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine (Il6, Il1β, Tnfα, Ccl2) at the BCSFB in mice. We additionally observed a downregulated mRNA expression of drug efflux transporters (Abcc1, Abcc4, and Abcb1a) and tight junction protein (Cldn3) at the CP isolated from mice treated with DTG. Despite the structural similarities, BTG only elicited minor effects on the markers of interest at both the BBB and BCSFB. In summary, our current data demonstrates that DTG but not BTG strongly induced inflammatory responses in a rodent BBB and BCSFB model. Together, these data provide valuable insights into the mechanism of DTG-induced brain toxicity, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of DTG-associated neuropsychiatric adverse effect., (© 2024 The Author(s). The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). The aim of this study was to evaluate improvements in NPAEs after switching an INSTI-based regimen to darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) or doravirine (DOR). Methods : A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the reversibility of NPAEs via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and D) in patients who started antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC). These patients were switched to DRV/c or DOR. Scales were compared at the moment of the switch and 12 weeks later. Results : We included 1153 treatment-naïve men, 676 (58.7%) with BIC and 477 (41.3%) with DTG. A total of 32 (2.7%) experienced NPAEs that led to discontinuation. Insomnia was found in 20 patients; depression via PHQ-9 in 21 patients, via HADS-D in 5 patients, and anxiety via HADS-A in 12 patients. All of them were evaluated by a psychiatrist at the moment of the symptoms; 7 (21.8%) started psychotropic drugs. After 12 weeks of follow-up, PHQ-9, ISI, HADS-A, and HADS-D decreased, with a p -value ≤ 0.05. Conclusions : NPAEs seem to improve after switching to a DRV/c- or DOR-based regimen after the first 4 and 12 weeks.

Background: This study examined the plasma concentration, clinical efficacy, and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in Chinese people with HIV (PWH)., Methods: In this observational study, HIV-positive individuals on DTG-based regimens for at least 6 months were included. Plasma DTG concentrations were measured 1 month after initiating treatment. Viral loads (VL) and CD4+ T cell counts were evaluated at baseline and after 1 and 6 months of therapy. High-performance liquid chromatography was used for measuring DTG concentrations, polymerase chain reaction for VL, and flow cytometry for CD4+ T cell counts. Safety assessments included monitoring liver enzymes, serum creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate, and adverse reactions., Results: Eighty-two Chinese PWH were enrolled. Average VL decreased significantly from baseline by 3.1 log at 1 month and 3.5 log at 6 months. CD4+ T cell counts increased from 273 cells/mm 3 at baseline to 378 cells/mm 3 and 446 cells/mm 3 after 1 and 6 months, respectively. Seventy-five percent achieved undetectable VLs (<20 copies/mL) by 6 months. C max and C τ were 4.63 and 1.98 μg/mL, respectively. The safety profile was favorable with only 4.88% experiencing transient dizziness., Conclusion: Preliminary findings suggest higher DTG plasma concentrations in Chinese PWH compared to Western populations, with promising short-term efficacy and safety.

Background: Real-world experience with combinations of short-course rifapentine-based regimens and integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) in management of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) is limited among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH)., Methods: From August 2019 to October 2022, PWH receiving 3 months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid (3HP) or 1 month of daily rifapentine plus isoniazid (1HP) in combination with ART were included. The primary outcome was virologic response within 12 months after LTBI treatment; secondary outcomes included treatment completion rate and safety of LTBI regimens., Results: During the study period, 479 PWH (94.6% male; median age, 43 years) were included: 142 received 1HP and bictegravir (BIC)-containing regimens (1HP/BIC group), 46 1HP and dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimens (1HP/DTG group), 38 3HP and BIC-containing regimens (3HP/BIC group), 214 3HP and DTG-containing regimens (3HP/DTG group), 17 1HP and other ART regimens (1HP/others group), and 22 3HP/other ART regimens (3HP/others group). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the proportions of PWH maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL within 12 months after LTBI treatment completion were 96.5% (1HP/BIC), 100% (1HP/DTG), 100% (3HP/BIC), 95.8% (3HP/DTG), 100% (1HP/others), and 100% (3HP/others). The overall completion rates were >80% for all treatment groups, whereas >50% of the included PWH experienced any adverse event. LTBI regimens and ART combinations were not associated with virologic response and completion rate., Conclusions: Combinations of short-course rifapentine-based regimens and integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-containing ART maintained viral suppression for most PWH within 12 months of LTBI treatment completion with low rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. C. H. has received research support from Gilead Sciences and speaker honoraria from Gilead Sciences and served on advisory boards for Gilead Sciences. H. Y. S. has received research support from Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Dolutegravir increases serum creatinine by inhibiting its renal tubular secretion and elimination. We investigated determinants of early changes in serum creatinine in a southern African cohort starting first-line dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART)., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from participants in a randomized controlled trial of dolutegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) (ADVANCE, NCT03122262). We assessed clinical, pharmacokinetic and genetic factors associated with change in serum creatinine from baseline to Week 4 using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, baseline serum creatinine, HIV-1 RNA concentration, CD4 T-cell count, total body weight and co-trimoxazole use., Results: We included 689 participants, of whom 470 had pharmacokinetic data and 315 had genetic data. Mean change in serum creatinine was 11.3 (SD 9.9) μmol.L -1 . Factors that were positively associated with change in serum creatinine at Week 4 were increased log dolutegravir area under the 24-h concentration-time curve (change in creatinine coefficient [β] = 2.78 μmol.L -1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 5.01]), TDF use (β = 2.30 [0.53, 4.06]), male sex (β = 5.20 [2.92, 7.48]), baseline serum creatinine (β = -0.22 [-0.31, -0.12]) and UGT1A1 rs929596 A→G polymorphism with a dominant model (β = -2.33 [-4.49, -0.17]). The latter did not withstand correction for multiple testing., Conclusions: Multiple clinical and pharmacokinetic factors were associated with early change in serum creatinine in individuals initiating dolutegravir-based ART. UGT1A1 polymorphisms may play a role, but further research on genetic determinants is needed., (© 2024 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and tenofovir alafenamide have been associated with weight gain in several clinical trials and observational cohorts. However, whether weight gain associated with INSTIs and tenofovir alafenamide confers a higher risk of weight-related clinical events is unclear. We aimed to assess whether changes in BMI differentially increase hypertension or dyslipidaemia risk in people with HIV receiving INSTIs, tenofovir alafenamide, or both versus other contemporary regimens., Methods: This multicentre, prospective observational study analysed prospective data from RESPOND, an international consortium of HIV cohorts for which recruitment began in 2017 and is still ongoing from HIV clinics and hospitals in 37 European countries and Australia. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, receiving INSTI-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens or a contemporary non-INSTI, did not have hypertension or dyslipidaemia at baseline, and had baseline and at least two follow-up BMI, lipid, and blood pressure measurements. We excluded participants without baseline CD4 or HIV RNA results and those receiving non-ART medications associated with weight changes, including antipsychotics and mood stabilisers, corticosteroids, insulin, and insulin secretagogues. They were followed up from baseline until the earliest hypertension or dyslipidaemia event, their last visit, or Dec 31, 2021, whichever was earlier. The primary outcomes were incidence of hypertension and dyslipidaemia, for which we used multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for time-updated BMI to determine unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of hypertension and dyslipidaemia in people receiving INSTIs, tenofovir alafenamide, or both, and tested for interaction between time-updated ART regimen and BMI., Findings: Of the 35 941 RESPOND participants, 9704 (7327 [75·5 %] male and 2377 [24·5%] female) were included in the hypertension analysis and 5231 (3796 [72·6%] male and 1435 [27·4%] female) were included in the dyslipidaemia analysis. In the univariable model, hypertension was more common in individuals receiving an INSTI with tenofovir alafenamide (IRR 1·70, 95% CI 1·54-1·88) or an INSTI without tenofovir alafenamide (1·41, 1·30-1·53) compared with those receiving neither INSTIs nor tenofovir alafenamide. Adjustment for time-updated BMI and confounders attenuated risk in participants receiving an INSTI with (IRR 1·48, 1·31-1·68) or without (1·25, 1·13-1·39) tenofovir alafenamide. Similarly, dyslipidaemia was more common in participants using tenofovir alafenamide with an INSTI (IRR 1·24, 1·10-1·40) and tenofovir alafenamide alone (1·22, 1·03-1·44) than in participants using neither INSTI nor tenofovir alafenamide. Adjustment for BMI and confounders attenuated the risk in participants receiving tenofovir alafenamide with an INSTI (adjusted IRR 1·21, 1·07-1·37), whereas the risk in those receiving tenofovir alafenamide alone became non-significant (1·15, 0·96-1·38). The associations between increasing BMI and risk of hypertension and dyslipidaemia did not differ between participants receiving different ART regimens (p interaction =0·46 for hypertension; p interaction =0·31 for dyslipidaemia)., Interpretation: Although residual confounding cannot be entirely excluded, the use of INSTIs was associated with incident hypertension, and the use of tenofovir alafenamide was associated with dyslipidaemia, with the latter association partly mediated by weight gain. These results reiterate the need for hypertension and dyslipidaemia screening in people with HIV., Funding: The CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV Cohort, The Austrian HIV Cohort Study, The Australian HIV Observational Database, The AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands national observational HIV cohort, The Brighton HIV Cohort, The National Croatian HIV Cohort, The EuroSIDA cohort, The Frankfurt HIV Cohort Study, The Georgian National AIDS Health Information System, The Nice HIV Cohort, The ICONA Foundation, The Modena HIV Cohort, The PISCIS Cohort Study, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study, The Swedish InfCare HIV Cohort, The Royal Free HIV Cohort Study, The San Raffaele Scientific Institute, The University Hospital Bonn HIV Cohort, The University of Cologne HIV Cohort, Merck Life Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AM has received travel support and lecture and consultancy fees from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Eiland, and Bonnin, all outside the submitted work. VV is an employee of and has stocks in ViiV Healthcare. CC is an employee of and has stocks in Gilead Sciences. EB is an employee of and has stocks in MSD. ML has received sitting fees from Certa Therapeutics data safety monitoring board. KG-P has served on advisory boards and provided lectures for Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare. AR has received support for attending meetings and travel from Gilead Sciences and Pfizer, received an investigator-initiated trial grant from Gilead Sciences, and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD and Pfizer (all paid to the institution). All other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is common in people with HIV (PWH), and has great impact in terms of morbidity and mortality. Several intertwined mechanisms are believed to play a role in determining the increased risk of CVD, including the effect of certain antiretrovirals; among these, the role of integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) is yet to be fully elucidated. We conducted a multicenter, observational study comprising 4984 PWH evaluating the antiretroviral therapy (ART)-related nature of CVD in real life settings, both in naïve vs. treatment-experienced people. A comparison was conducted between INSTIs vs. either protease inhibitors (PIs) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) considering demographic, baseline clinical characteristics, incidence of CVD in both 2-year and complete follow-up periods. Among 2357 PWH exposed to INSTIs, 24 people experienced CVD; the corresponding figure was 12 cases out of 2599 PWH exposed to other ART classes. At univariate and multivariate analysis, a tendency towards an increased risk of CVD was observed in the 2-year follow-up period in PWH exposed to INSTIs in the absence, however, of statistical significance. These findings leave open the hypothesis that INSTIs may play a role, albeit minimal, in determining an increased risk of CVD in PWH.

Introduction: people living with HIV/AIDS using antiretroviral therapy sometimes present with comorbid conditions or co-infections. This could lead to an increased risk of drug interactions due to the concomitant use of drugs. The aim of the study was to explore the overall impact of dolutegravir on such comorbidities and the effect of concomitant medication on the safety and efficacy of dolutegravir., Methods: data was collected using a survey questionnaire and a retrospective review of medical records of a prospective study sample. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for up to 12 months after dolutegravir initiation. Concomitantly used drugs and supplements that were identified to have a potential interaction with dolutegravir were further characterized. Descriptive and summary statistics were used to describe the data, t-tests were performed on blood glucose levels and cross-tabulations were done on some variables., Results: of the 461 participants enrolled into the study, 172 (37.3%) and 54 (11.7%) experienced comorbidity and coinfection respectively. More than 50% of the participants used concomitant medicines. Metformin use led to increased blood glucose levels (p=0.009); participants on rifampicin (n=8) received an additional daily dose of dolutegravir. Virological outcomes in participants on sodium valproate (n=2) and St John´s wort (n=1) did not show safety concerns, whilst 3 dolutegravir discontinuations were observed in participants using supplements and antacids containing divalent cations., Conclusion: even though dolutegravir was safe and effective in the study population, with possible drug interactions leading to treatment discontinuations in only 3(0.7%) participants, further investigation into dolutegravir-induced hyperglycemia needs investigation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright: Nivriti Hurbans et al.)

Background: Dolutegravir is an integrase strand transfer inhibitor that has been recommended for use in first-line antiretroviral regimens by the World Health Organisation and is currently being rolled out globally. There has been safety concerns with dolutegravir which has caused concern about its use in the general population. Dolutegravir first-line regimens have been used in South Africa since early 2020. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of first-line dolutegravir-based antiretrovirals amongst adults living with HIV in Durban, South Africa., Methods: This was a mixed-methods study, which comprised a cross-sectional survey and longitudinal retrospective follow-up of medical records. The study was conducted between October 2020 and January 2022. Data were described using descriptive and summary statistics. Bivariate logistic regression was applied to socio-demographic and clinical variables and crude odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Pearson chi-square tests, paired sample T-tests, and cross-tabulations were performed on selected variables., Results: A total of 461 participants were enrolled in the study. There was a significant change in immunological outcomes (p < 0.001) after dolutegravir initiation. Furthermore, an assessment of laboratory parameters showed that there was a significant decrease in cholesterol (p < 0.001) and increase in creatinine (p < 0.001) levels. Increased weight was shown by 60.7% of the participants but was not associated with age, gender, CD4 counts, and previous antiretroviral usage. The study found that 43.6% of the participants experienced at least one side-effect. A total of 21.6% and 23.2% of the participants experienced neuropsychiatric and central nervous system side-effects, respectively. In the bivariate analyses, only gender was shown to be associated with side-effects, and only 1.7% of the participants discontinued the study due to side-effects., Conclusion: Our results suggest that dolutegravir is effective, safe, and well tolerated in the study population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To assess the adherence, adverse drug reactions (ADR), and virologic outcomes of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy., Design: This was a retrospective chart review., Setting: A tertiary health facility-based study in Abakaliki, Nigeria., Participants: Five hundred and fifteen (515) adult patients on dolutegravir were selected using a Random Number Generator. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from patients' case notes and analysed with IBM-SPSS version-25., Main Outcome Measures: Adherence to dolutegravir, ADRs, virologic outcome, and change in Body Mass Index (BMI) were estimated., Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.5±10.8 years; 68.2% of them were females; 97.1% of them had good self-reported adherence. The majority (82.9%) of them reported no ADRs and among those (17.1%) that did, headache (9.7%), body-itching (3.1%), and skin rash (2.7%) dominated. Most achieved viral suppression (94.4%) and did not have detectable viral particles (57.4%). There was a significant increase in the BMI of the patients with a mean weight increase of 0.9kg, a mean BMI increase of 0.3 kg/m 2 , and a 2.6% increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity., Conclusions: Patients on dolutegravir reported low ADRs, good self-reported adherence, and a high viral suppression rate. However, dolutegravir is associated with weight gain. We recommend widespread use and more population-wide studies to elucidate the dolutegravir-associated weight gain., Funding: None declared., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (Copyright © The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: The introduction of dolutegravir, an oral integrase inhibitor, within public health HIV programs has been a success, with excellent sustained viral load suppression, persistence, and safety. Initial concerns around integrase-inhibitors being implicated in safety concerns around immune reconstitution inflammatory syndromes (IRIS), neural tube defects, and weight gain, have been largely laid to rest, but new concerns about cardiovascular risk have arisen, including a link between hypertension and this antiretroviral class., Recent Findings: We review the pertinent studies here, and while we find both observational and randomized controlled study associations in some but not all studies, these are often confounded by associated weight gain and aging. In addition, definitions of hypertension, as well as measurement within the studies (such as cuff size), were not consistent within studies., Summary: Careful analysis will be needed, as with the weight-gain signal, before assigning causation, especially as plausible physiological mechanisms for this rise in blood pressure are unclear., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are associated with weight gain in women living with HIV (WLH). Relationships between drug exposure, baseline obesity, and INSTI-associated weight gain remain unclear. Data from 2006 to 2016 were analyzed from virally suppressed WLH enrolled in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, who switched/added an INSTI to antiretroviral therapy: [raltegravir (RAL), dolutegravir (DTG), or elvitegravir (EVG)]. Percent body weight change was calculated from weights obtained a median 6 months pre-INSTI and 14 months post-INSTI initiation. Hair concentrations were measured with validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS assays. Baseline (preswitch) weight status evaluated obese (body mass index, BMI, ≥30 kg/m 2 ) versus nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m 2 ). Mixed models examined the drug hair concentration*baseline obesity status interaction for each INSTI. There were 169 WLH included: 53 (31%) switched to RAL, 72 (43%) to DTG, and 44 (26%) to EVG. Women were median age 47-52 years, predominantly Non-Hispanic Black, median CD4 counts >500 cells/mm 3 , >75% with undetectable HIV-1 RNA. Over ∼1 year, women experienced median increases in body weight: 1.71% (-1.78, 5.00) with RAL; 2.40% (-2.82, 6.50) with EVG; and 2.48% (-3.60, 7.88) with DTG. Baseline obesity status modified the relationship between hair concentrations and percent weight change for DTG and RAL ( p' s < 0.05): higher DTG, yet lower RAL concentrations were associated with greater weight gain among nonobese women. Additional pharmacologic assessments are needed to understand the role of drug exposure in INSTI-associated weight gain.

We studied hepatic steatosis in people with HIV (PWH) who switched to an integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimen. One hundred and fifty-four PWH were included. After 48 weeks, median (Q1-Q3) weight gain was 1.2 (-0.6 to 3.8) kg and median (Q1-Q3) controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) change was -4 (-33 to 27) dB/m. Weight gain was weakly correlated with CAP change [R2 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.144 (-0.014 to 0.296); P = 0.074)]. Changes in hepatic steatosis after switching to INSTI-based regimens do not seem to parallel weight gain after 1 year., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A recent observational study suggested that the risk of cardiovascular events could be higher among antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive individuals with HIV who receive integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based ART than among those who receive other ART regimens. We aimed to emulate target trials separately in ART-naive and ART-experienced individuals with HIV to examine the effect of using INSTI-based regimens versus other ART regimens on the 4-year risk of cardiovascular events., Methods: We used routinely recorded clinical data from 12 cohorts that collected information on cardiovascular events, BMI, and blood pressure from two international consortia of cohorts of people with HIV from Europe and North America. For the target trial in individuals who had previously never used ART (ie, ART-naive), eligibility criteria were aged 18 years or older, a detectable HIV-RNA measurement while ART-naive (>50 copies per mL), and no history of a cardiovascular event or cancer. Eligibility criteria for the target trial in those with previous use of non-INSTI-based ART (ie, ART-experienced) were the same except that individuals had to have been on at least one non-INSTI-based ART regimen and be virally suppressed (≤50 copies per mL). We assessed eligibility for both trials for each person-month between January, 2013, and January, 2023, and assigned individuals to the treatment strategy that was compatible with their data. We estimated the standardised 4-year risks of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or invasive cardiovascular procedure) via pooled logistic regression models adjusting for time and baseline covariates. In per-protocol analyses, we censored individuals if they deviated from their assigned treatment strategy for more than 2 months and weighted uncensored individuals by the inverse of their time-varying probability of remaining uncensored. The denominator of the weight was estimated via a pooled logistic model that included baseline and time-varying covariates., Findings: The analysis in ART-naive individuals included 10 767 INSTI initiators and 8292 non-initiators of INSTI. There were 43 cardiovascular events in INSTI initiators (median follow-up of 29 months; IQR 15-45) and 52 in non-initiators (39 months; 18-47): standardised 4-year risks were 0·76% (95% CI 0·51 to 1·04) in INSTI initiators and 0·75% (0·54 to 0·98) in non-INSTI initiators; risk ratio 1·01 (0·57 to 1·57); risk difference 0·0089% (-0·43 to 0·36). The analysis in ART-experienced individuals included 7875 INSTI initiators and 373 965 non-initiators. There were 56 events in INSTI initiators (median follow-up 18 months; IQR 9-29) and 3103 events (808 unique) in non-INSTI initiators (26 months; 15-37) in non-initiators: standardised 4-year risks 1·41% (95% CI 0·88 to 2·03) in INSTI initiators and 1·48% (1·28 to 1·71) in non-initiators; risk ratio 0·95 (0·60 to 1·36); risk difference -0·068% (-0·60 to 0·52)., Interpretation: We estimated that INSTI use did not result in a clinically meaningful increase of cardiovascular events in ART-naive and ART-experienced individuals with HIV., Funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMR, RWL, and SMI report National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants paid to their institution during the conduct of the study. SL reports grants from the NIH and the Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research. MAH reports grants from the NIH and personal honoraria from Cytel, ProPublica, and ADIA Lab. JACS reports grants from the NIH and UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). AP received grants from the Wellcome Trust, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the NIH, and UK NIHR and payments from the Gates Foundation outside of the study. FB reports grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. IJ reports payments from Gilead Sciences, GESIDA, and ViiV Healthcare. MJG participated on advisory boards for Merck, Gilead, and ViiV. MBK has received grants and honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, AbbVie, and Gilead. LM reports grants from ANRS-MIE INSERM paid to her institution. RL received grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Alberta Innovates, and the University of Calgary outside of the study. PR reports grants from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck & Co. CAS and MvdV report grants and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and MSD outside of the submitted work. BS reports financial support to his institution for travel grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV healthcare, and for advisory boards from Gilead Sciences. GT received grants from Gilead Sciences and University College London and EU and national funds. AvS reports grants from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. LW received grants from ANRS-MIE. JMM has received consulting honoraria and research grants from Angelini, Contrafect, Cubist, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Jansen, Lysovant, Medtronic, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. JMM has also received a personal 80:20 research grant from Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain, during 2017–24. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Dolutegravir (DTG), an integrase strand transfer inhibitor is currently the recommended first and second line anti-retroviral therapy (ART) anchor agent by the World Health Organization due to its favorable side effect profile, high efficacy and genetic barrier to resistance.Despite its very good side effect profile, there have been multiple case reports of ART experienced patients developing hyperglycemia within weeks to a few months after switching to DTG preceded by weight loss. At population level, however, DTG as well as other integrase inhibitors have been demonstrated to have a reduced risk of incident diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to other HIV drug classes.Following multiple similar reports of accelerated hyperglycemia in Uganda during the first pilot year of DTG use, the Uganda Ministry of Health recommended withholding dolutegravir in all patients who develop diabetes. Whether this recommendation should be applied to all patients with incident T2DM remains to be demonstrated.We present a clinical case of an HIV positive ART naïve man who was diagnosed with T2DM after 36 weeks on DTG. We describe changes in blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin resistance and pancreatic beta cell function before and after withholding DTG. We demonstrated that he was phenotypically different from the reported cases of accelerated hyperglycemia and he continued to have worsening insulin resistance despite withholding DTG. His blood glucose improved with dietary T2DM management. It is possible he had an inherent risk of developing T2DM independent of his exposure to DTG. This put in question whether DTG should universally be withheld in PLHIV with incident T2DM in Uganda., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Research suggests that integrase strand transferase inhibitor use can lead to weight gain, and data from sub-Saharan countries are limited. This study investigated changes in weight in Namibians switched from tenofovir DF/emtricitabine/efavirenz (TEE) to tenofovir DF/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD)., Methods: Longitudinal, retrospective, and quantitative study from outpatient records of Namibians living with HIV/AIDS switched from efavirenz-to dolutegravir-based regimen at four clinics. A linear mixed effects model predicting weight 6 months prior to the switch, time of the switch, and at 6, 12-, and 18-months post-switch was run. A second analysis comparing change in weights between males and females was also run., Results: 242 patients switched from TEE to TLD. Compared to patient weight at the time of the switch, weights were significantly higher at 6 (+0.9 kg, p = 0.004), 12 (+1.7 kg, p < 0.001), and 18 months (+1.4 kg, p < 0.001) post-switch. There was no significant weight change for males, but females had a significant weight gain at 12 (+1.58 kg, p = 0.012) and 18 months (+1.49 kg, p = 0.024) post switch., Conclusions: Females living with HIV in Namibia gain weight when switched from TEE to TLD. Clinical implications on the development of cardiometabolic complications is unclear and mechanisms by which the weight gain occurs are unknown., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have been associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We investigated the impact of starting INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) on CVD events among treatment-naïve people with human immunodeficiency virus using a target trial framework, which reduces the potential for confounding and selection bias., Methods: We included Swiss HIV Cohort Study participants who were ART-naïve after May 2008, when INSTIs became available in Switzerland. Individuals were categorized according to their first ART regimen (INSTI vs other ART) and were followed from ART start until the first of CVD event (myocardial infarction, stroke, or invasive cardiovascular procedure), loss to follow-up, death, or last cohort visit. We calculated hazard ratios and risk differences using pooled logistic regression models with inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights., Results: Of 5362 participants (median age 38 years, 21% women, 15% of African origin), 1837 (34.3%) started INSTI-based ART, and 3525 (65.7%) started other ART. Within 4.9 years (interquartile range, 2.4-7.4), 116 CVD events occurred. Starting INSTI-based ART was not associated with an increased risk for CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], .46-1.39). Adjusted risk differences between individuals who started INSTIs and those who started other ART were -0.17% (95% CI, -.37 to .19) after 1 year, -0.61% (-1.54 to 0.22) after 5 years, and -0.71% (-2.16 to 0.94) after 8 years., Conclusions: In this target trial emulation, we found no difference in short- or long-term risk for CVD events between treatment-naïve people with human immunodeficiency virus who started INSTI-based ART and those on other ART., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . B. S. reports financial support to his institution for travel grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV healthcare, and for advisory boards from Gilead Sciences. D. H.’s institution receives unrestricted educational grants from AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, and ViiV Healthcare, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, and GSK. D. H. has received advisory fees from Gilead and ViiV Healthcare and reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca and UCB, all outside the submitted work. D. H. also reports roles on PFMD Executive Committee, Gilde Healthcare Impact Council, EUPATI Advisory committee (chair), Positive Council (chair), and Aids-Hilfe Bern. M. S. reports support to his institution for advisory boards from Gilead, MSD, ViiV, Pfizer, and Moderna, as well as for travel grants from Gilead. P. S. reports financial support to his institution for advisory boards and travel grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare. E. B. reports financial support to his institution for advisory boards and/or travel grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Pfizer, Ely Lilly, AstraZeneca and Moderna. E. B. also reports grants or contracts paid to institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme. All remuneration went to his home institution and not to E. B. personally, and all remuneration was provided outside the submitted work. P. E. T.’s institution reports unrestricted and educational grants from Gilead, ViiV, and MSD, and advisory fees from Gilead and ViiV, and reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, ViiV, and Gilead, all outside the submitted work. H. F. G. has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Janssen, GSK, Novartis, and ViiV Healthcare; a travel grant from Gilead and grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Swiss HIV Cohort Research Foundation, the Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and from National Institutes of Health. G. W. reports unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche Diagnostics, as well as travel grants and advisory board/lecture fees from ViiV, Gilead Sciences, and MSD, all paid to his institution. A. R. reports support to his institution for advisory boards and/or travel grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, and Pfizer, and an investigator-initiated trial (IIT) grant from Gilead Sciences. A. R. also reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Moderna. All remuneration went to his home institution and not to A. R. personally, and all remuneration was provided outside the submitted work. C. A. F. reports a Gilead grant for clinical and laboratory follow-up of drug substitution patients regarding HCV in our area, paid to the Department of Infectious Diseases of the Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland; support for Advisory Board attendance for Gilead, Menarini, Moderna, MSD, and ViiV, paid to institution. A. C. reports unrestricted educational grants from MSD, Gilead, and ViiV. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objectives: Concerns have been raised regarding neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions of integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) in patients living with HIV. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of depression and suicidality reporting with INSTIs based on a global pharmacovigilance database., Methods: Depression and suicidality cases in patients treated with INSTIs were identified within the WHO global database of individual case safety reports, VigiBase. Risk of depression and suicidality reporting with INSTIs compared with other ART was assessed using disproportionality analyses (case/non-case statistical approach)., Results: Of 19 991 410 reports over the study period, 124 184 reports concerned patients exposed to ART, including 22 661 patients exposed to an INSTI. Among patients treated with an INSTI, 547 cases of depression and 357 cases of suicidality were identified. Disproportionality analyses showed that depression [reporting OR (ROR) 3.6; 95% CI: 3.2-4.0] and suicidality (ROR 4.7; 95% CI: 4.1-5.4) were more reported with the use of INSTIs compared with other ART. Amongst INSTIs, depression reporting was significantly greater for bictegravir and dolutegravir, whereas suicidality reporting was significantly greater for dolutegravir only., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that depression and suicidality are adverse drug reactions of all INSTI agents, especially dolutegravir, which may occur within the first months of therapy., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Data to inform the switch from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to dolutegravir in patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who do not have genotype information and who have viral suppression with second-line therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted PI have been limited., Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial conducted at four sites in Kenya, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, previously treated patients without genotype information who had viral suppression while receiving treatment containing a ritonavir-boosted PI to either switch to dolutegravir or continue the current regimen. The primary end point was a plasma HIV type 1 RNA level of at least 50 copies per milliliter at week 48, assessed on the basis of the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm. The noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in the percentage of participants who met the primary end point was 4 percentage points. Safety up to week 48 was assessed., Results: A total of 795 participants were enrolled, with 398 assigned to switch to dolutegravir and 397 assigned to continue taking their ritonavir-boosted PI; 791 participants (397 in the dolutegravir group and 394 in the ritonavir-boosted PI group) were included in the intention-to-treat exposed population. At week 48, a total of 20 participants (5.0%) in the dolutegravir group and 20 (5.1%) in the ritonavir-boosted PI group met the primary end point (difference, -0.04 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to 3.0), a result that met the criterion for noninferiority. No mutations conferring resistance to dolutegravir or the ritonavir-boosted PI were detected at the time of treatment failure. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in the dolutegravir group and the ritonavir-boosted PI group (5.7% and 6.9%, respectively)., Conclusions: In previously treated patients with viral suppression for whom there were no data regarding the presence of drug-resistance mutations, dolutegravir treatment was noninferior to a regimen containing a ritonavir-boosted PI when the patients were switched from a ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimen. (Funded by ViiV Healthcare; 2SD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04229290.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) decreases perinatal HIV transmission, but concerns exist regarding maternal and infant safety. We compared the incidence of congenital malformations and other adverse outcomes in pregnancies exposed to integrase inhibitor (INSTI) versus non-INSTI ART., Setting: Single-site review of all pregnancies among women living with HIV between 2008 and 2018., Methods: We used binomial family generalized estimating equations to model the relationship of congenital anomalies and pregnancy outcomes with exposure to INSTI or dolutegravir (DTG) versus non-INSTI ART., Results: Among 257 pregnancies, 77 women received ≥1 INSTI (54 DTG, 14 elvitegravir, 15 raltegravir), 167 received non-INSTI, and 3 had missing data. Fifty congenital anomalies were identified in 36 infants. Infants with first-trimester DTG or any first-trimester INSTI exposure had higher odds of congenital anomalies than infants with first-trimester non-INSTI exposure (OR = 2.55; 95%CI = 1.07-6.10; OR = 2.61; 95%CI = 1.15-5.94, respectively). Infants with INSTI exposure after the second trimester had no increased odds of anomalies. Women with INSTI exposure had higher odds of preeclampsia (OR = 4.73; 95%CI = 1.70-13.19). Among women who received INSTI, grade ≥3 laboratory abnormalities were noted in 2.6% while receiving the INSTI and 3.9% while not receiving the INSTI, versus 16.2% in women who received non-INSTI. There was no association between INSTI exposure and other pregnancy outcomes., Conclusion: In our cohort, first-trimester INSTI exposure was associated with increased rates of congenital anomalies and use of INSTI during pregnancy was associated with preeclampsia. These findings underscore the need for continued monitoring of the safety of INSTI in pregnancy., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Adriana Weinberg discloses research grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck that were paid to the University of Colorado and personal fees from Merck, Squirus and GlaxoSmithKline for work unrelated to this study. The remaining authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Smith et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), including raltegravir (RAL), dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), bictegravir (BIC), and cabotegravir (CAB), are increasingly used, given excellent data on their efficacy, effectiveness, and tolerability profile in adults, while data in children are accumulating. To review the most recent evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, safety, and resistance of INSTIs in children, a quick narrative review of the available literature data was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus databases, including only English-language studies, published between 2009 and 2022. Six studies (259 children) on RAL use, 17 studies (3,448 children) on DTG, 2 studies (73 children) on EVG, and 1 study (102 children) on BIC were retrieved. Results on efficacy and effectiveness were close to those reported in adult studies, suggesting similarities between children and adult population. Resistance to RAL was detected in four studies, ranging between 5.0% to 35.3% of participants. In four studies resistance to DTG occurred in 12.4% to 22% of children. Adverse events to RAL have been uncommon reported. In studies on EVG, 8% to 74% of children developed uveitis, nausea, or abdominal pain. In DTG studies, the proportion of weight gain ranged from 10% to 87%, and neuropsychiatric effects ranged 1% to 16% of participants. One BIC study reported adverse events >10% of participants. The evidence supports high efficacy and low toxicity of INSTIs in pediatric and adolescent populations.

Objective: Women with HIV(WWH) are more likely to discontinue/change antiretroviral therapy(ART) due to side effects including neuropsychiatric symptoms. Efavirenz and integrase strand transfer inhibitors(INSTIs) are particularly concerning. We focused on these ART agents and neuropsychiatric symptoms in previously developed subgroups of WWH that differed on key sociodemographic factors as well as longitudinal behavioral and clinical profiles. WWH from the Women's Interagency HIV Study were included if they had ART data available, completed the Perceived Stress Scale-10 and PTSD Checklist-Civilian. Questionnaires were completed biannually beginning in 2008 through 2016. To examine ART-symptom associations, constrained continuation ratio model via penalized maximum likelihood were fit within 5 subgroups of WWH. Data from 1882 WWH contributed a total of 4598 observations. 353 women were previously defined as primarily having well-controlled HIV with vascular comorbidities, 463 with legacy effects(CD4 nadir < 250cells/mL), 274 aged ≤ 45 with hepatitis, 453 between 35-55 years, and 339 with poorly-controlled HIV/substance users. INSTIs, but not efavirenz, were associated with symptoms among key subgroups of WWH. Among those with HIV legacy effects, dolutegravir and elvitegravir were associated with greater stress/anxiety and avoidance symptoms(P's < 0.01); dolutegravir was also associated with greater re-experiencing symptoms(P = 0.005). Elvitegravir related to greater re-experiencing and hyperarousal among women with well-controlled HIV with vascular comorbidities(P's < 0.022). Raltegravir was associated with less hyperarousal, but only among women aged ≤ 45 years(P = 0.001). The adverse neuropsychiatric effects of INSTIs do not appear to be consistent across all WWH. Key characteristics (e.g., age, hepatitis positivity) may need consideration to fully weight the risk-benefit ratio of dolutegravir and elvitegravir in WWH., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Following reports of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) experienced Ugandan people living with HIV (PLHIV) presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis weeks to months following a switch to dolutegravir (DTG), the Uganda Ministry of Health recommended withholding DTG in both ART naïve and experienced PLHIV with diabetes mellitus (T2DM), as well as 3-monthly blood glucose monitoring for patients with T2DM risk factors. We sought to determine if the risk of T2DM is indeed heightened in nondiabetic ART naïve Ugandan PLHIV over the first 48 weeks on DTG., Methods: Between January and October 2021, 243 PLHIV without T2DM were initiated on DTG based ART for 48 weeks. Two-hour oral glucose tolerance tests (2-h OGTT) were performed at baseline, 12, and 36 weeks; fasting blood glucose (FBG) was measured at 24 and 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the incidence of T2DM. Secondary outcomes included: incidence of pre-Diabetes Mellitus (pre-DM), median change in FBG from baseline to week 48 and 2-h blood glucose (2hBG) from baseline to week 36. Linear regression models were used to determine adjusted differences in FBG and 2hBG from baseline to weeks 48 and 36 respectively., Results: The incidence of T2DM was 4 cases per 1000 PY (1/243) and pre-DM, 240 cases per 1000 person years (PY) (54/243). There was a significant increase in FBG from baseline to week 48 [median change from baseline (FBG): 3.6 mg/dl, interquartile range (IQR): - 3.6, 7.2, p-value (p) = 0.005] and significant reduction in 2hBG (2hBG: - 7.26 mg/dl, IQR: - 21.6, 14.4, p = 0.024) at week 36. A high CD4 count and increased waist circumference were associated with 2hBG increase at week 36., Conclusion: We demonstrated a low incidence of T2DM in Ugandan ART-naïve patients receiving DTG. We also demonstrated that longitudinal changes in BG were independent of conventional risk factors of T2DM in the first 48 weeks of therapy. Restricting the use of dolutegravir in Ugandan ART naïve patients perceived to be high risk for diabetes mellitus may be unwarranted., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Cohort studies suggest higher discontinuation rates with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) than are seen in clinical trials. We assessed discontinuations and adverse events (AEs) that were considered related to the initial INSTI in the first year following initiation among treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLWH)., Methods: Newly diagnosed PLWH initiating raltegravir, elvitegravir/cobicistat, dolutegravir or bictegravir in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate between 10/2007 and 1/2020 at the Orlando Immunology Center were included. Unadjusted incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for treatment-related discontinuations and AEs associated with the initial INSTI in the first year following initiation., Results: Of 331 enrolled, 26 (8%) initiated raltegravir, 151 (46%) initiated elvitegravir/cobicistat, 74 (22%) initiated dolutegravir and 80 (24%) initiated bictegravir. Within the first year, treatment-related discontinuations occurred in 3 on elvitegravir/cobicistat (IR 0.02 per person-years (PPY)) and 5 on dolutegravir (IR 0.08 PPY); no treatment-related discontinuations occurred among those initiating raltegravir or bictegravir. Eleven treatment-related AEs occurred in 7 on raltegravir (IR 0.46 PPY), 100 treatment-related AEs occurred in 63 on elvitegravir/cobicistat (IR 0.72 PPY), 66 treatment-related AEs occurred in 37 on dolutegravir (IR 0.97 PPY) and 65 treatment-related AEs occurred in 34 on bictegravir (IR 0.88 PPY). Unadjusted IRRs did not reveal any significant difference between INSTIs in terms of early treatment-related discontinuations or AEs., Conclusions: In our cohort, treatment-related AEs occurred in 43% initiating INSTIs but were responsible for early discontinuation in only 2% with no treatment-related discontinuations observed among those initiating RAL or BIC.

Introduction: Globally about 1.7 million children were living with HIV in 2020. Two integrase strand transfer inhibitors, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are increasingly used in children. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir and raltegravir in children and adolescents living with HIV, aged 0-19 years., Methods: Sources included MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, abstracts from key conferences and reference list searching. Observational studies and clinical trials published January 2009-March 2021 were eligible. Outcomes included efficacy/effectiveness (CD4 counts and viral load) and/or safety outcomes (mortality, grade 3/4 adverse events and treatment discontinuation) through 6 months or more post-treatment initiation. Risk of bias was assessed using previously published tools appropriate for the study design. Narrative syntheses were conducted., Results and Discussion: In total, 3626 abstracts and 371 papers were screened. Eleven studies, including 2330 children/adolescents, reported data on dolutegravir: one randomized controlled trial (RCT; low risk of bias), one single-arm trial (unclear risk of bias) and nine cohort studies (three low risk of bias, two unclear risk and four high risk). Ten studies, including 649 children/adolescents receiving raltegravir, were identified: one RCT (low risk of bias), one single-arm trial (low risk of bias) and eight cohort studies (four low risk of bias, three unclear risk and one high risk). Viral suppression levels in children/adolescents at 12 months were high (>70%) in most studies assessing dolutegravir (mostly second- or subsequent-line, or mixed treatment lines), and varied from 42% (5/12) to 83% (44/53) at 12 months in studies assessing raltegravir (mostly second- or subsequent-line). Across all studies assessing dolutegravir or raltegravir, grade 3/4 adverse events (clinical and/or laboratory) were reported in 0-50% of subjects, few resulted in discontinuation, few were drug related and no deaths were attributed to either drug., Conclusions: These reassuring findings suggest that dolutegravir and raltegravir are effective and safe as preferred regimens in children and adolescents living with HIV. With the rollout of dolutegravir in paediatric populations already underway, it is critical that data are collected on safety and effectiveness in infants, children and adolescents, including on longer-term outcomes, such as weight and metabolic changes., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.)

Objective: The primary objective was to explore weight and BMI changes in people with HIV (PWH) undergoing integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI)-based regimens (vs. non-INSTI) in a large cohort and in the subsets of individuals without diabetes and insulin resistance (IR) at the time of switch to INSTI. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for IR and cut-off of weight or BMI increase associated with IR in PWH switching to INSTI., Design: A longitudinal matched-cohort study including PWH attending Modena HIV Metabolic Clinic, Italy., Methods: PWH were divided into two groups: non-INSTI and INSTI-switch. The effect of switching to INSTI on weight and BMI change was tested through a linear mixed model. A mediation analysis explored the mediation effect of weight and BMI change in the association between the switch to INSTI and IR., Results: We analyzed 2437 PWH (1025 INSTI-switch, 1412 non-INSTI), in 54 826 weight assessments. Trends for weight increase were significantly higher in early-INSTI-switch (vs. early-non-INSTI), but no difference was observed in the late period after the switch. In the subset of 634 PWH without IR, switching to INSTI (vs. non-INSTI) was associated with a lower risk of IR (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 0.98). A weight increase by 1% reduced the total protective effect of INSTI by 21.1% over 1 year of follow-up, which identifies a 5% weight increase as a clinically meaningful weight gain definition., Conclusion: A cut-off of 5% weight gain from the time of INSTI-switch is associated with IR, which may be a clinically meaningful endpoint that could be used in clinical and research settings., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the incidence of hypertension in people living with HIV receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) versus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) or boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) in the RESPOND consortium of HIV cohorts., Methods: Eligible people with HIV were aged ≥18 years who initiated a new three-drug ART regimen for the first time (baseline), did not have hypertension, and had at least two follow-up blood pressure (BP) measurements. Hypertension was defined as two consecutive systolic BP measurements ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or initiation of antihypertensives. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of hypertension, overall and in those who were ART naïve or experienced at baseline., Results: Overall, 4606 people living with HIV were eligible (INSTIs 3164, NNRTIs 807, PIs 635). The median baseline systolic BP, diastolic BP, and age were 120 (interquartile range [IQR] 113-130) mmHg, 78 (70-82) mmHg, and 43 (34-50) years, respectively. Over 8380.4 person-years (median follow-up 1.5 [IQR 1.0-2.7] years), 1058 (23.0%) participants developed hypertension (incidence rate 126.2/1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 118.9-134.1). Participants receiving INSTIs had a higher incidence of hypertension than those receiving NNRTIs (aIRR 1.76; 95% CI 1.47-2.11), whereas the incidence was no different in those receiving PIs (aIRR 1.07; 95% CI 0.89-1.29). The results were similar when the analysis was stratified by ART status at baseline., Conclusion: Although unmeasured confounding and channelling bias cannot be excluded, INSTIs were associated with a higher incidence of hypertension than were NNRTIs, but rates were similar to those of PIs overall, in ART-naïve and ART-experienced participants within RESPOND., (© 2022 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

Competing Interests: I declare no competing interests.

Background: Although associations between older antiretroviral drug classes and cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV are well described, there is a paucity of data regarding a possible association with integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). We investigated whether exposure to INSTIs was associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease., Methods: RESPOND is a prospective, multicentre, collaboration study between 17 pre-existing European and Australian cohorts and includes more than 32 000 adults living with HIV in clinical care after Jan 1, 2012. Individuals were eligible for inclusion in these analyses if they were older than 18 years, had CD4 cell counts and HIV viral load measurements in the 12 months before or within 3 months after baseline (latest of cohort enrolment or Jan 1, 2012), and had no exposure to INSTIs before baseline. These individuals were subsequently followed up to the earliest of the first cardiovascular disease event (ie, myocardial infarction, stroke, or invasive cardiovascular procedure), last follow-up, or Dec 31, 2019. We used multivariable negative binomial regression to assess associations between cardiovascular disease and INSTI exposure (0 months [no exposure] vs >0 to 6 months, >6 to 12 months, >12 to 24 months, >24 to 36 months, and >36 months), adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. RESPOND is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04090151, and is ongoing., Findings: 29 340 people living with HIV were included in these analyses, of whom 7478 (25·5%) were female, 21 818 (74·4%) were male, and 44 (<1%) were transgender, with a median age of 44·3 years (IQR 36·2-51·3) at baseline. As of Dec 31, 2019, 14 000 (47·7%) of 29 340 participants had been exposed to an INSTI. During a median follow-up of 6·16 years (IQR 3·87-7·52; 160 252 person-years), 748 (2·5%) individuals had a cardiovascular disease event (incidence rate of 4·67 events [95% CI 4·34-5·01] per 1000 person-years of follow-up). The crude cardiovascular disease incidence rate was 4·19 events (3·83-4·57) per 1000 person-years in those with no INSTI exposure, which increased to 8·46 events (6·58-10·71) per 1000 person-years in those with more than 0 months to 6 months of exposure, and gradually decreased with increasing length of exposure, until it decreased to similar levels of no exposure at more than 24 months of exposure (4·25 events [2·89-6·04] per 1000 person-years among those with >24 to 36 months of exposure). Compared with those with no INSTI exposure, the risk of cardiovascular disease was increased in the first 24 months of INSTI exposure and thereafter decreased to levels similar to those never exposed (>0 to 6 months of exposure: adjusted incidence rate ratio of 1·85 [1·44-2·39]; >6 to 12 months of exposure: 1·19 [0·84-1·68]; >12 to 24 months of exposure: 1·46 [1·13-1·88]; >24 to 36 months of exposure: 0·89 [0·62-1·29]; and >36 months of exposure: 0·96 [0·69-1·33]; p<0·0001)., Interpretation: Although the potential for unmeasured confounding and channelling bias cannot fully be excluded, INSTIs initiation was associated with an early onset, excess incidence of cardiovascular disease in the first 2 years of exposure, after accounting for known cardiovascular disease risk factors. These early findings call for analyses in other large studies, and the potential underlying mechanisms explored further., Funding: The CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV Cohort, The Austrian HIV Cohort Study, The Australian HIV Observational Database, The AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands National Observational HIV cohort, The EuroSIDA cohort, The Frankfurt HIV Cohort Study, The Georgian National AIDS Health Information System, The Nice HIV Cohort, The ICONA Foundation, The Modena HIV Cohort, The PISCIS Cohort Study, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study, The Swedish InfCare HIV Cohort, The Royal Free HIV Cohort Study, The San Raffaele Scientific Institute, The University Hospital Bonn HIV Cohort and The University of Cologne HIV Cohorts, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JMM reports a personal 80:20 research grant from Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, during 2017–22, and consulting honoraria or research grants from AbbVie, Angelini, Contrafect, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Jansen, Medtronic, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and ViiV Healthcare. CS reports payment or honoraria from Gilead for educational presentations. FW reports consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare. JJV reports grants or contracts from Merck, Gilead, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Basilea, German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Deutsches Zetrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, University of Bristol, and Rigshospitalet Copenhagen; consulting fees from Pfizer, Gilead, and Shionogi; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from Merck, Gilead, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Basilea, DZIF, University Hospital Freiburg/Congress and Communication, Academy for Infectious Medicine, University Manchester, German Society for Infectious Diseases (DGI), Ärztekammer Nordrhein, University Hospital Aachen, Back Bay Strategies, German Society for Internal Medicine (DGIM), Shionogi, Molecular Health, Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin, Janssen, and NordForsk. AS reports grants from Gilead Sciences (payment to institution) and GSK (payment to institution); and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from Merck. ACar reports grants from ViiV Healthcare and MSD; consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, ViiV healthcare, and MSD; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events Gilead Sciences; and support for attending meetings or travel from Gilead Sciences, MSD. HG owns stock in GSK and is an employee of ViiV Healthcare. FR is an employee of and has stock options in Gilead Sciences. HG reports grants or contracts from Swiss National Science Foundation (payment made to institution), Yvonne Jacob Foundation (payment made to institution), Gilead Sciences (COVID-19 program; payment made to institution); and participation a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Merck, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, ViiV Healthcare, and Novartis. LDR reports payment for conference fee, transport, and accommodation, and participation at meetings held by, Takeda, MSD, Gilead Sciences, and GSK. MvdV reports grants or contracts with ViiV Healthcare (payment made to institution) and Gilead Sciences (payment made to institution); consulting fees from Merck (payment made to institution), ViiV Healthcare (payment made to institution), and Gilead Sciences (payment made to institution); and being a board member for Amsterdam Dinner foundation (unpaid). AM reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences; payment for expert testimonial from Eiland and Bonnin; and support for attending meetings and travel from ViiV Healthcare. AP-M reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from Gilead Sciences. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Over the past decade, antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens that include integrase strand inhibitors (INSTIs) have become the most commonly used for people with HIV starting ART. Although trials and observational studies have compared virological failure on INSTI-based with other regimens, few data are available on mortality in people with HIV treated with INSTIs in routine care. Therefore, we compared all-cause mortality between different INSTI-based and non-INSTI-based regimens in adults with HIV starting ART from 2013 to 2018., Methods: This cohort study used data on people with HIV in Europe and North America from the Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) and UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC). We studied the most common third antiretroviral drugs (additional to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) used from 2013 to 2018: rilpivirine, darunavir, raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, efavirenz, and others. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and other drugs in the regimen) for mortality were estimated using Cox models stratified by ART start year and cohort, with multiple imputation of missing data., Findings: 62 500 ART-naive people with HIV starting ART (12 422 [19·9%] women; median age 38 [IQR 30-48]) were included in the study. 1243 (2·0%) died during 188 952 person-years of follow-up (median 3·0 years [IQR 1·6-4·4]). There was little evidence that mortality rates differed between regimens with dolutegravir, elvitegravir, rilpivirine, darunavir, or efavirenz as the third drug. However, mortality was higher for raltegravir compared with dolutegravir (aHR 1·49, 95% CI 1·15-1·94), elvitegravir (1·86, 1·43-2·42), rilpivirine (1·99, 1·49-2·66), darunavir (1·62, 1·33-1·98), and efavirenz (2·12, 1·60-2·81) regimens. Results were similar for analyses making different assumptions about missing data and consistent across the time periods 2013-15 and 2016-18. Rates of virological suppression were higher for dolutegravir than other third drugs., Interpretation: This large study of patients starting ART since the introduction of INSTIs found little evidence that mortality rates differed between most first-line ART regimens; however, raltegravir-based regimens were associated with higher mortality. Although unmeasured confounding cannot be excluded as an explanation for our findings, virological benefits of first-line INSTIs-based ART might not translate to differences in mortality., Funding: US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and UK Medical Research Council., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MC reports grants and payments for expert testimony from Gilead, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare, paid to their institution; and payment support for attending meetings from Gilead. PC reports advisory board and expert fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck; lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead; and travel grants paid to their institution from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead. CS reports fees from Gilead for an educational presentation. MJG reports honoraria in the last 3 years from ad hoc membership of national HIV advisory boards, and from Merck, Gilead, and ViiV Healthcare. MP reports honoraria for presentations from Gilead and Merck; consulting fees from Gilead, Merck, and AbbVie; and a research grant from Gilead. FB reports travel grants and honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Janssen, and Merck; consulting fees and payment for expert testimony from Gilead; and support for attending meetings from Gilead, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. PR reports independent scientific grant support from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare, paid to their institution; and has served on scientific advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck, for which honoraria were all paid to their institution, none related to the content of this Article. MRi reports funds from Gilead for attending meetings; and payment for lectures from ViiV Healthcare. MRa reports grants from Gilead. GB reports consulting fee from MedIQ; payments and honoraria from the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, and StateServ; and funding from Merck, Eli Lily, Kaiser Permanente, and Amgen paid to their institution. HC reports research grant funding from ViiV Healthcare, National Institute of Health, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, paid to their institution; and sits on the National Institute of Health Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council. NO reports funding from the Preben og Anne Simonsens Fond. CAS reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen–Cilag for membership of Data Safety and Monitoring Boards, Advisory Boards, and for preparation of educational materials; and is the vice-chair of the British HIV Association. PD reports consulting fees from Gilead, Merck, Janssen and Cilag, ViiV Healthcare, Roche, and Theratechnologies; and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gilead, Merck, Janssen, ViiV Healthcare, and Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are commonplace in modern antiretroviral therapy (ART). Increased weight gain with their use is increasingly scrutinized. We evaluated weight changes in treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 attending a UK centre who started regimens including raltegravir or dolutegravir., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adults prescribed an INSTI between January 2015 and March 2020 were categorized as having started an ART regimen containing raltegravir, dolutegravir, a protease inhibitor or a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Individuals with one or more weight measurement ≤ 5 years both pre- and post-ART initiation, who started a three-drug regimen with ≥ 6 months duration and achieved virological suppression (< 50 copies/mL) within 6 months were included. A random effects model with linear slope pre- and post-ART was used, adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, ART regimen, backbone and year of initiation., Results: The cohort included 390 adults; 88.7% were male, 66.4% were of white ethnicity, their median age was 40 years, there was a median of six weight measurements, 2.2 years from diagnosis to ART initiation, 2.9 years from ART to the last weight measurement, and weight and body mass index at initiation were 75 kg and 24.1 kg/m 2 respectively. Of these, 254 (65%) started an INSTI. The average pre-ART rate of weight gain was 0.44 kg/year [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.70], increasing to 0.88 kg/year (0.63-1.10, p = 0.04) after ART initiation. Our adjusted model found no evidence of an association between ART regimen and rate of weight gain., Conclusions: Weight increased in the cohort both pre- and post-ART. We found no evidence of a higher rate of weight gain following ART initiation with an INSTI compared with other regimens., (© 2021 British HIV Association.)

Excessive weight gain associated with integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) antiretrovirals is an emerging issue; however, the metabolic consequences of this effect have not been established. Our objective was to evaluate for InSTI-emergent weight gain and potential associated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among a diverse HIV patient cohort. For this retrospective cohort study, we obtained clinical warehouse data for HIV+ patients between fiscal years 2007-17. We compared patients initiated on an InSTI with those started on an alternate regimen. Our primary outcome was percentage weight change from baseline to 24 months postinitiation using the linear mixed-effects model fit by restricted maximum likelihood. Our secondary outcome was incident T2DM as defined by a new prescription for antihyperglycemic medication within 18 months after antiretroviral therapy (ART) start. Diabetes-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional-hazards model. The cohort included 1,235 individuals initiating ART, 136 (11.0%) with an InSTI. InSTI use in women was significantly associated with greater weight gain compared with non-InSTIs (11.0%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 5.22 to 16.8, p  < .01), after adjusting for potential confounding variables. In a univariate analysis, InSTI use was associated with more incident T2DM diagnoses compared with non-InSTI regimens (unadjusted hazard ratio = 3.27, p  = .01), although incident T2DM was not associated with weight gain. InSTIs were significantly associated with weight gain among females. We also observed an increased risk of incident diabetes mellitus among both sexes, however, unrelated to weight changes. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding and investigate its mechanism.

People living with HIV have a higher risk of developing tuberculosis, and tuberculosis is one of the leading causes of death among people living with HIV globally. Treating HIV and tuberculosis concurrently has morbidity and mortality benefits. However, HIV and tuberculosis co-treatment is challenging due to drug-drug interactions, overlapping toxicities, tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution syndrome, and concerns for treatment failure or drug resistance. Drug-drug interactions between antiretrovirals and tuberculosis drugs are driven mainly by the rifamycins (for example, the first-line tuberculosis drug rifampicin), and dose adjustments or drug switches during co-treatment are commonly required. Several implementation challenges and research gaps exist when combining the integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), highly potent antiretroviral drugs recommended as first-line treatment of HIV, and drugs used for the treatment and prevention of tuberculosis. Ongoing and planned studies will address some critical questions on the use of INSTIs in settings with a high tuberculosis burden, including dosing of dolutegravir, bictegravir, and cabotegravir when used with the rifamycins for both tuberculosis treatment and prevention. Failure, in the past, to include people with tuberculosis in HIV clinical treatment trials has been responsible for some of the research gaps still evident for informing optimisation of HIV and tuberculosis co-treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The transition to dolutegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) was complicated by an initial safety signal in May 2018 suggesting that exposure to dolutegravir at conception was possibly associated with infant neural tube defects. On the basis of additional evidence, in July 2019, the World Health Organization recommended dolutegravir for all adults and adolescents living with HIV., Objective: To describe dolutegravir uptake and disparities by sex and age group in LMICs., Design: Observational cohort study., Setting: 87 sites that began using dolutegravir in 11 LMICs in the Asia-Pacific; Caribbean, Central and South America network for HIV epidemiology (CCASAnet); and sub-Saharan African regions of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium., Patients: 134 672 patients aged 16 years or older who received HIV care from January 2017 through March 2020., Measurements: Sex, age group, and dolutegravir uptake (that is, newly initiating ART with dolutegravir or switching to dolutegravir from another regimen)., Results: Differences in dolutegravir uptake among females of reproductive age (16 to 49 years) emerged after the safety signal. By the end of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of dolutegravir uptake among females 16 to 49 years old was 29.4% (95% CI, 29.0% to 29.7%) compared with 57.7% (CI, 57.2% to 58.3%) among males 16 to 49 years old. This disparity was greater in countries that began implementing dolutegravir before the safety signal and initially had highly restrictive policies versus countries with a later rollout. Dolutegravir uptake was similar among females and males aged 50 years or older., Limitation: Follow-up was limited to 6 to 8 months after international guidelines recommended expanding access to dolutegravir., Conclusion: Substantial disparities in dolutegravir uptake affecting females of reproductive age through early 2020 are documented. Although this disparity was anticipated because of country-level restrictions on access, the results highlight its extent and initial persistence., Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.

Background: Children with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have limited options for effective antiretroviral treatment (ART)., Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing three-drug ART based on the HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir with standard care (non-dolutegravir-based ART) in children and adolescents starting first- or second-line ART. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with virologic or clinical treatment failure by 96 weeks, as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety was assessed., Results: From September 2016 through June 2018, a total of 707 children and adolescents who weighed at least 14 kg were randomly assigned to receive dolutegravir-based ART (350 participants) or standard care (357). The median age was 12.2 years (range, 2.9 to 18.0), the median weight was 30.7 kg (range, 14.0 to 85.0), and 49% of the participants were girls. By design, 311 participants (44%) started first-line ART (with 92% of those in the standard-care group receiving efavirenz-based ART), and 396 (56%) started second-line ART (with 98% of those in the standard-care group receiving boosted protease inhibitor-based ART). The median follow-up was 142 weeks. By 96 weeks, 47 participants in the dolutegravir group and 75 in the standard-care group had treatment failure (estimated probability, 0.14 vs. 0.22; difference, -0.08; 95% confidence interval, -0.14 to -0.03; P = 0.004). Treatment effects were similar with first- and second-line therapies (P = 0.16 for heterogeneity). A total of 35 participants in the dolutegravir group and 40 in the standard-care group had at least one serious adverse event (P = 0.53), and 73 and 86, respectively, had at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher (P = 0.24). At least one ART-modifying adverse event occurred in 5 participants in the dolutegravir group and in 17 in the standard-care group (P = 0.01)., Conclusions: In this trial involving children and adolescents with HIV-1 infection who were starting first- or second-line treatment, dolutegravir-based ART was superior to standard care. (Funded by ViiV Healthcare; ODYSSEY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02259127; EUDRACT number, 2014-002632-14; and ISRCTN number, ISRCTN91737921.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)