Search

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before surgery has already shown the therapy effectiveness in patients with cervical cancer. The present meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether the response to NAC predicts for prognosis. Systematic computerized searches of the PubMed and Web of Knowledge were performed. Prognosis outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The pooled odd ratio (OR) was estimated by using fixed-effect model or random-effect model according to heterogeneity between studies. Eighteen studies with 1,785 patients were included. Cisplatin-based NAC treatments were most commonly used. The clinical response rate ranged from 48.4 to 93.0 %, and the pathological response rate ranged from 27.6 to 30.6 %. The pooled ORs estimating the association of PFS with NAC response were 5.707 (95 % CI 3.564–9.137), 6.798 (95 % CI 4.716–9.799), 6.327 (95 % CI 4.398–9.102), and 5.214 (95 % CI 3.748–7.253) at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up, respectively, and the pooled ORs estimating the association of OS with NAC response were 6.179 (95 % CI 3.390–11.264), 9.155 (95 % CI 5.759–14.555), 8.431 (95 % CI 5.667–12.543), and 5.785 (95 % CI 4.124–8.115) at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up, respectively. No obvious statistical heterogeneity was detected. Funnel plots and Egger’s tests did not reveal publication bias. Sensitivity analysis showed the results of meta-analysis were robust. This meta-analysis confirms that response to NAC is an indicator for PFS and OS, and suggests that patients-achieving response of NAC before surgery predicts favorable prognosis for cervical cancer patients.

To establish a kind of standardization of the clinical chemotherapeutic prototypes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC).10-Hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) was applied through transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) to HCC patients who were categorized into three groups: (1) test group: treatment with HCPT twice (HCPT d1 and 14) through TAE and portal venous embolization. (2) Control I: treatment with anticancer drugs without HCPT. (3) Control II: treatment with HCPT as a major component in anticancer drugs once (HCPT d1). A set of comparisons between test groups and control I and II groups were performed before and after the treatment to study the effectiveness of each treatment, in terms of tumor volumes, dynamic variations in serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), gamma-glutamyl transferase hepatoma-specific band (GGT-II), patient survival and adverse events.The general effectiveness rate of the test group reached 62.1% (72/116), remarkably higher than that of control I (32.1%, 40/124) and control II (54.7%, 47/56), (P0.01 and P0.05, respectively). Especially, the reduction rate or disappearance of the portal vein tumor emboli was as high as 88.4% (61/69) in the test group, in contrast with 13.9% (10/72) in control I and 35.9% (18/51) in control II (P0.01 and P0.01, respectively). After treatment, AFP decreased or turned to negative levels at 52.3% (34/65) in control I, 67.3% (35/52) in control II, and 96.8% (60/62) in the test group. Also GGT-II declined or became negative at 37.8% (28/74) in control I, 69.5% (57/82) in control II, and 94.7% (89/94) in test group (P0.01 and P0.05, respectively).We have designed a good protocol (test group) to treat HCC with excellent advantages of high efficiency, low cost, low toxicity and low adverse events and easy application. It could be recommended as one of the standardizations for HCC treatment in clinical practice.