Search

A stable intense resistance called "nonhost resistance" generates a complete multiple-gene resistance against plant pathogenic species that are not pathogens of pea such as the bean pathogen, Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli (Fsph). Chitosan is a natural nonhost resistance response gene activator of defense responses in peas. Chitosan may share with cancer-treatment compounds, netropsin and some anti-cancer drugs, a DNA minor groove target in plant host tissue. The chitosan heptamer and netropsin have the appropriate size and charge to reside in the DNA minor groove. The localization of a percentage of administered radio-labeled chitosan in the nucleus of plant tissue in vivo indicates its potential to transport to site(s) within the nuclear chromatin (1,2). Other minor groove-localizing compounds administered to pea tissue activate the same secondary plant pathway that terminates in the production of the anti-fungal isoflavonoid, pisatin an indicator of the generated resistance response. Some DNA minor groove compounds also induce defense genes designated as "pathogenesis-related" (PR) genes. Hypothetically, DNA targeting components alter host DNA in a manner enabling the transcription of defense genes previously silenced or minimally expressed. Defense-response-elicitors can directly (a) target host DNA at the site of transcription or (b) act by a series of cascading events beginning at the cell membrane and indirectly influence transcription. A single defense response, pisatin induction, induced by chitosan and compounds with known DNA minor groove attachment potential was followed herein. A hypothesis is formulated suggesting that this DNA target may be accountable for a portion of the defense response generated in nonhost resistance.

Over the last decades, medical research has utilized DNA altering procedures in cancer treatments with the objective of killing cells or suppressing cell proliferation. Simultaneous research related to enhancing disease resistance in plants reported that alterations in DNA can enhance defense responses. These two opposite perspectives have in common their effects on the center for gene transcription, the nuclear chromatin. A review of selected research from both anticancer- and plant defense-related research provides examples of some specific DNA altering actions: DNA helical distortion, DNA intercalation, DNA base substitution, DNA single cleavage by DNases, DNA alkylation/methylation, and DNA binding/exclusion. The actions of the pertinent agents are compared, and their proposed modes of action are described in this study. Many of the DNA specific agents affecting resistance responses in plants, e.g., the model system using pea endocarp tissue, are indeed anticancer agents. The tumor cell death or growth suppression in cancer cells following high level treatments may be accompanied with chromatin distortions. Likewise, in plants, DNA-specific agents activate enhanced expression of many genes including defense genes, probably due to the chromatin alterations resulting from the agents. Here, we propose a hypothesis that DNA damage and chromatin structural changes are central mechanisms in initiating defense gene transcription during the nonhost resistance response in plants.

Phytoalexins are antimicrobial substance synthesized in plants upon pathogen infection. Pisatin ( Pisum sativum phytoalexin) is the major phytoalexin in pea, while it is also a valuable indicator of plant defense response. Pisatin can be quantitated in various methods from classical organic chemistry to Mass-spectrometry analysis. Here we describe a procedure with high reproducibility and simplicity that can easily handle large numbers of treatments. The method only requires a spectrophotometer as laboratory equipment, does not require any special analytical instruments ( e.g ., HPLC, mass spectrometers, etc .) to measure the phytoalexin molecule quantitatively, i.e ., most scientific laboratories can perform the experiment., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.)

Salicylic acid (SA) has been reported to induce plant defense responses. The transcriptions of defense genes that are responsible for a given plant's resistance to an array of plant pathogens are activated in a process called non-host resistance. Biotic signals capable of carrying out the activation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes in pea tissue include fungal DNase and chitosan, two components released from Fusarium solani spores that are known to target host DNA. Recent reports indicate that SA also has a physical affinity for DNA. Here, we report that SA-induced reactive oxygen species release results in fragment alterations in pea nuclear DNA and cytologically detectable diameter and structural changes in the pea host nuclei. Additionally, we examine the subsequent SA-related increase of resistance to the true pea pathogen F. solani f.sp. pisi and the accumulation of the phytoalexin pisatin. This is the first report showing that SA-induced PR gene activation may be attributed to the host pea genomic DNA damage and that at certain concentrations, SA can be temporally associated with subsequent increases in the defense response of this legume.

Of the multiplicity of plant pathogens in nature, only a few are virulent on a given plant species. Conversely, plants develop a rapid "nonhost" resistance response to the majority of the pathogens. The anatomy of the nonhost resistance of pea endocarp tissue against a pathogen of bean, Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli (Fsph) and the susceptibility of pea to F. solani f sp. pisi (Fspi) has been described cytologically, biochemically and molecular-biologically. Cytological changes have been followed by electron microscope and stain differentiation under white and UV light. The induction of changes in transcription, protein synthesis, expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, and increases in metabolic pathways culminating in low molecular weight, antifungal compounds are described biochemically. Molecular changes initiated by fungal signals to host organelles, primarily to chromatin within host nuclei, are identified according to source of the signal and the mechanisms utilized in activating defense genes. The functions of some PR genes are defined. A hypothesis based on this data is developed to explain both why fungal growth is suppressed in nonhost resistance and why growth can continue in a susceptible reaction.

Pea pod endocarp suppresses the growth of an inappropriate fungus or non-pathogen by generating a "non-host resistance response" that completely suppresses growth of the challenging fungus within 6 h. Most of the components of this resistance response including pisatin production can be elicited by an extensive number of both biotic and abiotic inducers. Thus this phytoalexin serves as an indicator to be used in evaluating the chemical properties of inducers that can initiate the resistance response. Many of the pisatin inducers are reported to interact with DNA and potentially cause DNA damage. Here we propose that EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) is an elicitor to evoke non-host resistance in plants. EDTA is manufactured as a chelating agent, however at low concentration it is a strong elicitor, inducing the phytoalexin pisatin, cellular DNA damage and defense-responsive genes. It is capable of activating complete resistance in peas against a pea pathogen. Since there is also an accompanying fragmentation of pea DNA and alteration in the size of pea nuclei, the potential biochemical insult as a metal chelator may not be its primary action. The potential effects of EDTA on the structure of DNA within pea chromatin may assist the transcription of plant defense genes.

Chitosan, a naturally occurring polymer, became available in the 1980s in industrial quantities enabling it to be tested as an agricultural chemical. A usual procedure for developing agricultural chemicals starts by testing a number of different chemically synthesized molecules on a targeted biological system. Alternately, chitosan has been investigated as a single natural molecule assayed with numerous biological systems. This report describes the unique properties of the molecule and its oligomers, primarily in plant defense, additionally in yield increase, induction of cell death and stomatal closing. The plant plasma membrane and nuclear chromatin have been proposed as targets, though chitosan oligomers enter most regions of the cell. Subsequent changes occur in: cell membranes, chromatin, DNA, calcium, MAP kinase, oxidative burst, reactive oxygen species (ROS), callose, pathogenesis related (PR) genes/proteins, and phytoalexins. Chitosan oligomer mode(s) of action are proposed for different plant systems. Chitosan efficacy was based on documentation from published data. Attention was given to how chitosan, either applied externally or released by fungal inoculum, is transferred into plant cells and its subsequent action upon membrane and/or chromatin components. Within is a proposed scheme describing chitosan generation, signaling routes and mechanisms of defense gene activation. Examples of beneficial chitosan applications to major crop/food plants were included., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A DNase released from the fungal pathogen of bean, Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli (Fsph), was previously shown to signal the activation of total disease resistance and activate pathogenesis-related (PR) genes in pea. Data in the current study which used the pea-endocarp model to research non-host resistance, indicated that DNase released by Verticillium dahliae (Vd), pathogenic on potato also has non-host resistance-inducing capabilities in peas. Other strains of Vd that release DNase are pathogenic on other plant species. DNase catalytic activity was also released from representative genera of other pathogenic fungi. Purified VdDNase induced pisatin and pea gene DRR49 (PR-10 gene) in pea endocarp tissue. VdDNase reduced the in vitro growth of Vd but completely inhibited that of F. solani f. sp. pisi (Fspi) and a Colletotrichum pathogen of potato. VdDNase (2 units) applied to pea endocarp tissue both broke resistance to Fsph and increased resistance to Fspi. Pea DNA damage generated both by the VdDNase enzyme and the intact Vd spores indicated that the host DNA alteration is a component of the non-host resistance response (innate immunity). These data support the previously reported inductive potential of fungal DNase and further implicate fungal DNases as signals in activating non-host resistance responses., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Previous reports on the model nonhost resistance interaction between Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli and pea endocarp tissue have described the disease resistance-signaling role of a fungal DNase1-like protein. The response resulted in no further growth beyond spore germination. This F. solani f. sp. phaseoli DNase gene, constructed with a pathogenesis-related (PR) gene promoter, when transferred to tobacco, generated resistance against Pseudomonas syringe pv. tabaci. The current analytical/theoretical article proposes similar roles for the additional nuclear and mitochondrial nucleases, the coding regions for which are identified in newly available fungal genome sequences. The amino acid sequence homologies within functional domains are conserved within a wide array of fungi. The potato pathogen Verticillium dahliae nuclease was divergent from that of the saprophyte, yeast; however, the purified DNase from yeast also elicited nonhost defense responses in pea, including pisatin accumulation, PR gene induction, and resistance against a true pea pathogen. The yeast mitochondrial DNase gene (open reading frame) predictably codes for a signal peptide providing the mechanism for secretion. Mitochondrial DNase genes appear to provide an unlimited source of components for developing transgenic resistance in all transformable plants.

This mini-review points to the usefulness of the pea-Fusarium solani interaction in researching the biochemical and molecular aspects of the nonhost resistance components of peas. This interaction has been researched to evaluate the resistance roles of the phytoalexin, pisatin, the cuticle barrier, and the activation of the nonhost resistance response. Concurrently, evaluations of associated signaling processes and the tools possessed by the pathogen to contend with host obstacles were included. The properties of some pathogenesis-related genes of pea and their regulation and contribution to resistance are discussed. A proposed action of two biotic elicitors on both chromatin conformation and the architectural transcription factor, HMG A, is presented and includes time lines of events within the host immune response.

ABSTRACT Plant nonhost disease resistance is characterized by the induction of multiple defense genes. The pea DRR206 gene is induced following inoculation with pathogens and treatment with abiotic agents, and moderately induced by wounding. A deletion series of DRR206 promoter segments was fused with the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene and transiently transferred to tobacco, potato, and pea. GUS activity revealed that two upstream regions of the DRR206 promoter were particularly important for activation in the three plant species. Putative cis regulatory elements within the DRR206 promoter included a wound/pathogen- inducible box (W/P-box) and a WRKY box (W-box). Gel shift assays with nuclear extracts from treated and untreated tissue with the W/P-box revealed both similar and unique protein-DNA complexes from pea, potato, and tobacco. Tobacco was stably transformed with gene constructs of the DRR206 promoter fused with a DNase elicitor gene from Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli, FsphDNase. Pathogenicity tests indicated that the FsphDNase elicitor conferred resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci and Alternaria alternata in tobacco. Transgenic potatoes showed some sensitivity to the FsphDNase gene providing less protection against Phytophthora infestans. Thus, the elicitor-coding gene, FsphDNase, is capable of generating resistance in a heterologous plant system (tobacco) when fused with defined regions of the pea DRR206 promoter.

SUMMARY HMG-I/Y proteins are characterized by the presence of AT-hook motifs, DNA binding domains that recognize AT-rich tracts of DNA. By facilitating protein:protein and protein:DNA interactions in the vicinity of these AT-rich binding sites, HMG-I/Y positively or negatively regulates gene expression. Several pea defence gene promoters have AT-rich tracts of DNA that are potential targets for modulation via HMG-I/Y. In this study, a comparison of the expression of a pea defence gene (DRR206) mRNA relative to the expression of HMG-I/Y mRNA was monitored by Northern analysis following the inoculation of a fungal pathogen, Fusarium solani or treatment with chitosan and a F. solani DNase (Fsph DNase). In pea pod endocarp tissue, HMG-I/Y expression was observed at high levels in untreated tissue and at lower levels 6 h following inoculation or wounding of the tissue. Western blots with an antipea HMG-I/Y polyclonal antibody also revealed that pea HMG-I/Y is expressed at decreased levels 6 h following inoculation or elicitor treatment. HMG-I/Y extracted from pea caused alterations in the gel migration of radio-labelled AT-rich sequences from the pea DRR206 promoter, suggesting that similar interactions could exist in vivo. Agroinfiltration was utilized to express the pea HMG-I/Y gene in tobacco containing a chimeric gene fusion of a promoter from the PR gene, DRR206, and the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. Transient expression of pea HMG-I/Y led to a decrease in GUS reporter gene activity in the heterologous tobacco system. These data implicate pea HMG-I/Y abundance in the down-regulation of DRR206 gene expression, and possibly HMG-I/Y depletion in the expression of defence genes in pea.

Summary DNase released from Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli (Fsph DNase) has previously been reported to induce pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, phytoalexin accumulation and disease resistance against subsequent challenge with the true pea pathogen, Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi (Fspi). This report is a further analysis of DNase production with probes specific for both the gene and protein. N-terminal analysis of the approximately 20 kDa Fsph DNase protein facilitated both the development of anti-Fsph DNase antiserum and the cloning of the Fsph DNase gene. Utilizing the anti-Fsph DNase antiserum to prepare an affinity column, we demonstrated that the retention and recovery of the DNase activity was associated with this protein. Fsph DNase protein was detectable by Western analysis in both the fungi and plant cytoplasm within 6-8 h following inoculation of the pea endocarp surface. Partially purified DNase detected via catalytic activity began accumulating within pea tissue at 3 h post-inoculation. Enhanced fragmentation of pea DNA occurred within 5 h following treatment of pods with Fsph DNase or inoculations with the two fungi. DNA cleavage within the nuclei of endocarp pea cells was detectable via a TUNEL assay at 3 h post-inoculation. As a result of these findings, we propose that the entrance of Fsph DNase into the pea cell and the signalling of plant defence responses is temporally associated with the damage of host DNA.

Pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Alcan) endocarp tissue challenged with an incompatible fungal pathogen, Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli or fungal elicitors results in the induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and the accumulation of pisatin, a phytoalexin. Essentially the same response occurs in pea tissue exposed to DNA-specific agents that crosslink or intercalate DNA. In this study, the effects of DNA-damaging agents were assessed relative to the inducible expression of several pea PR genes: phenylalanine ammonia lyase, chalcone synthase, and DRR206. Mitomycin C and actinomycin D mimicked the biotic elicitors in enhancing the expression of all three PR genes. The activities of these PR gene promoters, isolated from different plants, were evaluated heterologously in transgenic tobacco. It is remarkable that beta-glucuronidase expression was induced when plants containing the heterologous phenylalanine ammonia lyase, chalcone synthase, and DRR206 promoter-beta-glucuronidase chimeric reporter genes were treated by DNA-damaging agents. Finally, cytological analyses indicated that many of these agents caused nuclear distortion and collapse of the treated pea cells. Yet we observed that cell death is not necessary for the induction of the PR gene promoters assessed in this study. Based on these observations and previously published results, we propose that DNA damage or the associated alteration of chromatin can signal the transcriptional activation of plant defense genes.

The plant's defense response against pathogens can be elicited by numerous external signals. Plant pathogens known to be incompatible on a given plant species can elicit strong disease resistance responses, whereas an adapted compatible pathogen generates a weaker response and thus can more readily infect the plant tissue. The plant's response can be manipulated genetically by the transfer of "R" genes (single dominant genes for race-specific disease resistance) or by treatment with elicitors such as chitosan. Both of these manipulations can result in the rapid activation of a subset of genes called PR (pathogenesis-related) genes, generally regarded as the genes that functionally develop disease resistance. There appear to be multiple modes by which chitosan can increase PR gene function, including activating cell surface or membrane receptors and internal effects on the plant's DNA conformation that in turn influence gene transcription. A novel strategy for controlling PR gene expression proposes to transform plants with a chitosan-inducible gene promoter linked in line with a single signal gene capable of rapid, intense induction of an entire set of PR genes, thereby enabling the control of disease resistance by external chitosan applications.

The inoculation of pea endocarp tissue with the bean pathogen Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli results in a non-host resistance response causing a complete cessation of fungal growth within 6 to 8 h. In addition to previously reported elicitation by chitosan, we now report that components of this response are also induced by a DNase released from this fungus. A single band of protein corresponding with DNase activity elicits phytoalexin production and the accumulation of RnA homologous with the pathogenesis-related (PR) genes DRR49, DRR206, and DRR230. Both the enzyme activity and the eliciting potential of the Fusarium DNase (Fsp DNase) are heat stable but susceptible to digestion by proteinase K. Fsp DNase mimics the intact fungus in inducing resistance against F. solani f. sp. pisi. Also, Fsp DNase causes similar cytologically detectable changes in pea tissue, such as increasing hypersensitive discoloration and diminishing fluorescence of Hoechst 33342-stained nuclei and fluorescein diacetate stained cells.

The fungicidal class I endochitinases (E.C.3.3.1.14, chitinase) are associated with the biochemical defense of plants against potential pathogens. We isolated and sequenced a genomic clone, DAH53, corresponding to a class I basic endochitinase gene in pea, Chi1. The predicted amino acid sequence of this chitinase contains a hydrophobic C-terminal domain similar to the vacuole targeting sequences of class I chitinases isolated from other plants. The pea genome contains one gene corresponding to the chitinase DAH53 probe. Chitinase RNA accumulation was observed in pea pods within 2 to 4 h after inoculation with the incompatible fungal strain Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli, the compatible strain F. solani f.sp. pisi, or the elicitor chitosan. The RNA accumulation was high in the basal region (lower stem and root) of both fungus challenged and wounded pea seedlings. The sustained high levels of chitinase mRNA expression may contribute to later stages of pea's non-host resistance.

Biologically derived chitosan has been reported to induce pisatin and disease resistance response proteins in pea tissue and also to inhibit the germination and growth of some fungal pathogens. Stereo-controlled synthesis of chitosan tetramer, hexamer, and octamer allowed the precise verification of oligomer size required for biological activity. The octameric oligomer optimally induced pisatin accumulation and inhibited fungal growth, verifying previous results obtained with column-purified oligomers derived from crab shells.

Apart from physical barriers, plants have two major types of defense against potential pathogens. In 'race-specific' resistance, plants match single mendelian resistance genes with the 'avirulence' genes possessed by races of a pathogen. Plants also employ the more complex and evolutionarily more robust system of 'nonhost resistance' against a broad range of pathogenic species. In peas, both types of resistance are associated with the expression of a common group of 'resistance response' genes.

beta-glucanases are prominent proteins in pea endocarp tissue responding to fungal infection. We have cloned and sequenced a partial pea cDNA clone, pPIG312, corresponding to a beta-1,3-glucanase in pea pods challenged with the incompatible pathogen Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli. The insert from the partial pea cDNA was used to probe a genomic library derived from pea leaves of the same cultivar. One of the genomic clones, pPIG4-3, contained the complete coding sequence for a mature beta-1,3-glucanase protein. The predicted amino acid sequence of the pea beta-1,3-glucanase has 78% identity to bean beta-1,3-glucanase, 62% and 60% to two tobacco beta-1,3-glucanases, 57% to soybean beta-1,3-glucanase, 51% to barley beta-1,3-glucanase, and 48% to barley beta-1,3-1,4-glucanase. Genomic Southern analysis indicates that the pea genome contains only one beta-1,3-glucanase gene corresponding to the probe used in this study. Accumulation of beta-1,3-glucanase mRNA homologous with the pPIG312 probe was detected in pea pods within 4 to 8 h after challenge with F. solani f. sp. phaseoli, f. sp. pisi, a compatible strain, or the elicitor, chitosan. In the incompatible reaction, mRNA accumulation remained high for 48h, whereas it rapidly decreased in the compatible reaction. After fungal inoculation of whole pea seedlings, the enhanced mRNA accumulation occurred mainly in the basal region (lower stem and root). This beta-1,3-glucanase mRNA was constitutively expressed in the roots of pea seedlings.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Two pea genes, pI39 and pI230, which are specifically induced by two forma specials of Fusarium solani, encode closely related proteins with predicted molecular masses (Mr) of 8.2 and 8 kDa, respectively. Both proteins contain a signal sequence and are cleaved to mature proteins of Mr 5 kDa as indicated by an in vitro translation system. The mature proteins contain about 17% cysteine residues and have the potential to form four disulfide bonds. The two proteins share extensive homology in their signal sequences but much less homology as mature proteins. The cysteine residues of the mature proteins are highly conserved, suggesting functional importance. Southern hybridization suggests these genes belong to a multigene family. The relative accumulations of mRNA levels indicate that the two genes are expressed somewhat differentially. In both the compatible (susceptible) and incompatible reactions between F. solani and pea tissue, pI39 mRNA accumulates more slowly than pI230 mRNA and accumulates to relatively high levels after 24 hr of inoculation. The increase in accumulation of pI230 mRNA occurs within 6 hr and thus correlates with an initial suppression of the growth of both the compatible and incompatible pathogen, which is cytologically observable at 6 hr. pI39 and pI230 belong to a distinct class of pathogenesis-related proteins characterized previously, which are associated with and thus may contribute to nonhost resistance in plants.

Disease resistance response genes (DRRG) of peas are expressed as the tissue is expressing race-specific or nonhost resistance. A pea genomic clone DRRG49-c encompassing one DRRG structural gene, the expression of which is correlated with the expression of disease resistance, was sequenced and characterized. The 2.3-kb genomic segment sequenced encompassed 986 bp 5' to the major transcriptional initiation site, a 474-bp open-reading frame interrupted by one 88-bp AT-rich intron and an additional 574-bp segment 3' from the stop codon. Southern blot analysis indicated that the DRRG structural gene is one of a multigenic family, and an estimated five copies exist within the pea genome. Primer extension analysis of the 5' terminus of the corresponding RNA suggested the presence of one major transcript with possibly two minor transcripts. The major transcript, located 65 bp from the translational initiation site, was expressed when challenged with Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli but not with water. The structural gene sequence corresponding to the genomic clone DRRG49-c is not identical with the structural gene of the cDNA clone DRRG49-a used as a probe for northern blot analysis, and thus, a possibility remains that it is not expressed in peas; however, the DRRG49-c promoter was able to express the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene in tobacco protoplasts. Western blot analysis using antiserum prepared from a beta-galactosidase-DRRG49-a fusion protein identified the DRRG49 gene product as a major protein accumulating during the host-pathogen interactions.

Membrane barriers which prevent direct contact between Fusarium solani and pea endocarp tissue prevent fungal spores from inducing phytoalexin production. Conversely, preinduced host resistance responses are not readily transported from the plant across the membrane barrier to Fusarium macroconidia.Crude enzyme extracts from pea endocarp tissues partially degrade Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli cell walls. Activities of the glycosidic enzymes, chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, chitosanase, beta-D-N-acetylglucosaminidase, beta-D-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, beta-D-glucosidase, alpha-D-glucosidase, and alpha-D-mannosidase, were detected in pea endocarp tissue. If pods are challenged with Fusarium spores or chitosan, the chitinase activity of the infected tissue remains higher than water-treated pods 0.5 to 6 hours after treatment. The beta-1,3-glucanase activity increases within 6 hours in both inoculated and control tissue. Chitosanase activity was lower in tissue treated with Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi, f. sp. phaseoli or chitosan than in water-treated control tissue. Thus, the pea tissue contains glycosidic enzymes with the potential to degrade the major compounds of the Fusarium cell walls.

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase was purified from peas, and a specific antiserum against the enzyme was produced in rabbits. The antiserum was used to study the first 8 hours of the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity response in two different organs of the pea from different developmental stages and in response to two different stimuli. Etiolated seedlings were pulse-labeled with l-[(35)S]methionine after either no light exposure or after specific periods of irradiation with blue light. Immature pods were pulse labeled with mixed l-[(3)H]amino acids after specific time periods following inoculation of the pod endocarp surfaces with macroconidia of Fusarium solani. Immunoprecipitates isolated from extracts of each group were analyzed with sodium dodecyl sulfate disc gel electrophoresis and were found to contain a radioactive protein with an electrophoretic mobility identical to that of the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase subunit (M(r) 81,000). The radioactivity contained in the subunit band was interpreted as being due to de novo synthesis of the enzyme. The net rate of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase labeling, found to be initially low in both tissue types, rose dramatically, peaking at approximately a six- to ten-fold greater level at 4 hours after the beginning of the stimulus. Thereafter, the rate of labeling declined slowly. Inoculation with F. solani f. sp. pisi, a true pathogen of peas, caused a fifty per cent greater rate of peak labeling than did inoculation with a nonpathogen, F. solani f. sp. phaseoli. The time profile of the changing rate of labeling correlates with the changing activity level of the enzyme which peaks at 12 hours after the onset of the stimulus. The data presented favor a model which explains the changing activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase as being due to a changing rate of synthesis or degradation (or both) of the enzyme rather than due to the activation of a preformed zymogen.

The substitution of the base analogue 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) for thymidine in the DNA of pea pods (Pisum sativum) induces or enhances the level of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and also induces the phytoalexin, pisatin, a product of the same metabolic pathway. Cordycepin, a polyadenylate inhibitor at the RNA level, is a potent inhibitor of pisatin synthesis. Kinetic studies on the inhibition of the PAL-pisatin production by hydroxyurea indicate that BrdU must be incorporated into DNA before any induction takes place. 5-Iododeoxyuridine is also an inducer while 5-fluorodeoxyuridine is ineffective when applied alone. BrdU is incorporated into the DNA of pea cells and the nuclei undergoes condensation just prior to the detection of the induced responses.

Chitinase and beta-1,-3-glucanase activities increased coordinately in pea (Pisum sativum L. cv "Dot") pods during development and maturation and when immature pea pods were inoculated with compatible or incompatible strains of Fusarium solani or wounded or treated with chitosan or ethylene. Up to five major soluble, basic proteins accumulated in stressed immature pods and in maturing untreated pods. After separation of these proteins by chromatofocusing, an enzymic function could be assigned to four of them: two were chitinases and two were beta-1,3-glucanases. The different molecular forms of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase were differentially regulated. Chitinase Ch1 (mol wt 33,100) and beta-1,3-glucanase G2 (mol wt 34,300) were strongly induced in immature tissue in response to the various stresses, while chitinase Ch2 (mol wt 36,200) and beta-1,3-glucanase G1 (mol wt 33,500) accumulated during the course of maturation. With a simple, three-step procedure, both chitinases and both beta-1,3-glucanases were purified to homogeneity from the same extract. The two chitinases were endochitinases. They differed in their pH optimum, in specific activity, in the pattern of products formed from [(3)H]chitin, as well as in their relative lysozyme activity. Similarly, the two beta-1,3-glucanases were endoglucanases that showed differences in their pH optimum, specific activity, and pattern of products released from laminarin.

Infection of immature pea pods with Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli (a non-pathogen of peas) or f.sp. pisi (a pea pathogen) resulted in induction of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase. Within 30 hours, activities of the two enzymes increased 9-fold and 4-fold, respectively. Chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase were also induced by autoclaved spores of the two F. solani strains and by the known elicitors of phytoalexins in pea pods, cadmium ions, actinomycin D, and chitosan. Furthermore, exogenously applied ethylene caused an increase of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase in uninfected pods. Fungal infection or treatment with elicitors strongly increased ethylene production by immature pea pods. Infected or elicitor-treated pea pods were incubated with aminoethoxyvinylglycine, a specific inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis. This lowered stress ethylene production to or below the level of uninfected controls; however, chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase were still strongly induced. It is concluded that ethylene and fungal infection or elicitors are separate, independent signals for the induction of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase.

Excised pea pods responded similarly to both the invasion of plant pathogenic fungi and the presence of bean tissue, bean pollen, and mouse tumor cells by synthesizing pisatin and by developing a characteristic yellow-green fluorescence. Both responses were dependent on RNA and protein synthesis. Conversely, the foreign pollen and incompatible fungi were sensitive to the pea pod tissue and were subject to abnormal development.The induction of pisatin and the yellow-green fluorescence development were mediated by multiple compounds of varying sizes released by fungi or mouse tumor cells. The incompatibility between a bean pathogen, Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli, and pea pod tissue was hypothesized to occur as a result of the cross contamination of such inducing compounds.

Chitosan, a polymer of beta-1,4-linked glucosamine residues with a strong affinity for DNA, was implicated in the pea pod-Fusarium solani interaction as an elicitor of phytoalexin production, an inhibitor of fungal growth and a chemical which can protect pea tissue from infection by F. solani f. sp. pisi. Purified Fusarium fungal cell walls can elicit phytoalexin production in pea pod tissue. Enzymes from acetone powders of pea tissue release eliciting components from the F. solani f. sp. phaseoli cell walls. Hydrochloric acid-hydrolyzed F. solani cell walls are about 20% glucosamine. The actual chitosan content of F. solani cell walls is about 1%. However, chitosan assays and histochemical observations indicate that chitosan content of F. solani spores and adjacent pea cells increases following inoculation. Dormant F. solani spores also accumulate chitosan. Concentrations of nitrous acid-cleaved chitosan as low as 0.9 microgram per milliliter and 3 micrograms per milliliter elicit phytoalexin induction and inhibit germination of F. solani macroconidia, respectively. When chitosan is applied to pea pod tissue with or prior to F. solani f. sp. pisi, the tissue is protected from infection.

A cDNA library was constructed using poly(A)(+)RNA fromPisum sativum which had been treated for 8 h with the fungusFusarium solani f. sp.phaseoli. Two thousand four hundred recombinant colonies were screened by differential colony hybridization using(32)P-labelled cDNAs prepared from RNA extracted from either noninoculated or inoculated pea tissue. cDNA clones were then selected, which showed greater hybridization with cDNA prepared from pea RNA 8 h post-inoculation than with a cDNA probe from 0 h. Seven distinct hybridization classes were chosen for further study. Northern blot analyses of total cellular RNAs inoculated for 16 h with eitherF. solani phaseoli or water demonstrated that each cDNA clone selected represents an mRNA species which increases substantially in abundance during infection.Results of(3)H-uridine pulse-labelling experiments suggested that enhanced synthesis is at least partially responsible for the accumulation of the fungus-inducible mRNAs which hybridized with the clones.

Pea tissue ;heat shocked' for 2 hours at 40 degrees C accumulates mRNAs that code for a series of new proteins called heat shock proteins. A different messenger RNA population, which codes for a high level of 20 or more ;resistance proteins,' accumulates in pea tissue as it resists plant pathogenic fungi. Heat shock treatment applied prior to fungal inoculation prevents the high level accumulation of messenger RNA coding for the 20 resistance proteins and blocks disease resistance. If the resistance response is initiated before the heat shock treatment or after heat shock recovery, messenger RNA accumulates for the resistance proteins and disease resistance develops.

Antisera specific for purified cell walls of Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi and phaseoli and of shrimp shell chitosan were utilized as immunochemical probes to determine the location of fungal components in the pea-Fusarium interaction.Within 15 minutes after inoculation, fungal cell wall components appear to enter the plant cell and to accumulate inside the plant cell wall as fungal growth on the plant tissue is inhibited. The accumulation patterns of chitosan and all components containing hexosamine polymers resembled those of the fungal wall components.Chitosan is present on, and is released from, the outer surface of the fungal spore. Within 15 minutes after applying [(3)H]chitosan to the surface of the plant tissue, the label is readily detectable within the plant cytoplasm and conspicuously detectable within the plant nucleus. It is proposed that the potential for transport of chitosan between the spores of Fusarium solani and pea cells, in addition to its potential to inhibit fungal growth and elicit disease resistance responses, suggests chitosan has a major regulatory role in this host-parasite interaction.

A given plant species is able to resist most of the potentially pathogenic microorganisms with which it comes in contact. This phenomenon, known as non-host resistance, can be overcome only by a very small number of 'true pathogens' which can use that plant as a host. In some cases, plants have developed mechanisms for overcoming infection by specific races or strains of a true pathogen. This race-specific resistance can be easily manipulated into agronomically important cultivars by plant breeders. We have previously described nine cDNA clones which represent pea genes active during non-host resistance against the fungus Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli. In the present work, we have used these cDNAs as probes to compare non-host resistance with race-specific responses of peas against three races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. Five of the genes most active during non-host resistance were also active in direct correlation with the phenotypic expression of resistance in race-specific reactions of five differential pea cultivars against three races of Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi.

Compounds with planar triple ring systems such as acridine orange, 9-amino acridine, 9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine (tacrine), 6,9-diamino-2-ethoxyacridine lactate monohydrate (DE-acridine), 6-chloro-9-(3'-diethylamino-2'-hydroxypropylamino) -2-methoxyacridine.2 HCl (CDM-acridine), quinacrine, 6-chloro-9-(4'-diethylamino-1'-methylbutylamino) -2-methoxy-1,10-diazaanthracene (CDM 1,10-diazaanthracene), thionine, azure A, methylene blue, and pyronine Y when applied to excised pea pods were potent inducers of phenylalanine ammonia lyase or of pisatin, or of both. Compounds with an array of structural variation around the planar three-ring system were tested for their ability to induce these responses in pea tissue. In general, dimethylamino, diethylamino, or amino substitutions at position 2 and 6 or an amino (with or without an aliphatic side chain) substitution at position 9 of the three-ring system augmented induction potential. Methyl green, methylene blue, 2,7-diaminofluorene, nile blue, neutral red, pyrogallol red, ethidium bromide, nogalamycin, quinine, chloroquine, spermine, 8-azaguanine, gliotoxin, chromomycin A(3), actinomycin D, and mitomycin C were also potent inducers. The inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia lyase induction by the application of actinomycin D (300 micrograms per milliliter) or 6-methylpurine (1 milligram per milliliter) within 1 hour after inducer application indicated that newly synthesized RNA is necessary for induction. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase induction was also inhibited by cycloheximide (150 micrograms per milliliter).

Increases in phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity and pisatin synthesis were induced in excised pea pods (a) by basic polypeptides such as protamine, histone, lysozyme, cytochrome c, and ribonuclease; (b) by the polyamines spermine, spermidine, cadaverine, and putrescine, and (c) by the synthetic oligopeptides poly-l-lysine, poly-dl-ornithine, and poly-l-arginine.Poly-l-lysine (1 milligram per milliliter, molecular weight 7,200) was utilized as a model inducer of pisatin and phenylalanine ammonia lyase. The poly-l-lysine-induced responses could be inhibited by adding the RNA synthesis inhibitors cordycepin or alpha-amanitin to the pods prior to or at the time of inducer application. Cordycepin added 1.5 hours after inducer no longer completely inhibited induction. The application of poly-l-lysine was shown to characteristically change the rate of RNA synthesis within 30 minutes. Ultrastructural changes in pea nuclei were detected within 3 hours, and gross changes in nuclear morphology were apparent at 14 hours after inducer application. The physical appearance of uranyl acetate-stained chromatin isolated from poly-l-lysine 2 hours after inducer application differed from that of water-treated tissues. The template properties of chromatin extracted from pods 3 hours after inducer application were consistently superior to control chromatin when assayed with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (without sigma factor). Chromatin from poly-l-lysine-induced tissue also bound 49% more actinomycin D-(3)H.The DNA-complexing properties of inducer compounds and the induced changes in the template and dye-binding properties of pea chromatin formed the basis for a proposed mode of action for phytoalexin induction.

Bean pod tissue (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Top Crop) is induced to produce phaseollin when challenged with various microorganisms. The pods react in the same manner when challenged with 9-aminoacridine. This compound also caused an increase in concentrations of phenylalanine ammonia lyase, an enzyme of the phaseollin synthesizing pathway. Both the synthesis of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and phaseollin are subject to inhibition by actinomycin D, cycloheximide, or 6-methylpurine. The results suggest that both phaseollin production and increased phenylalanine ammonia lyase, when induced by 9-aminoacridine, require newly synthesized RNA and protein.The concentration of 9-aminoacridine optimal for synthesis of phaseollin and PAL (0.5 mg/ml) does not increase the rate of total protein synthesis. However, there is a differential effect of 9-aminoacridine on synthesis of certain protein fractions. Optimal concentrations of 9-aminoacridine induce phaseollin and phenylalanine ammonia lyase synthesis while reducing the net synthesis of RNA during the period of induction.The planar three-ring structure of 9-aminoacridine appears to be a desirable feature for phaseollin and phenylalanine ammonia lyase induction. Similar compounds, all DNA intercalators, having dimethylamino, diethylamino, amino, or 9-alkylamino substitutions of a three-ring acridine skeleton, are also inducers of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and phaseollin synthesis.It is suggested that 9-aminoacridine and other DNA intercalators function as inducers of phaseollin and phenylalanine ammonia lyase synthesis by reacting with the DNA template.

The psoralen compounds, xanthotoxin and 4,5', 8-trimethylpsoralen, when activated, increased phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity and the synthesis of pisatin in excised pea pods. Pods presoaked 1 hr with 4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen and then irradiated 4 minutes with 366 nanometer ultraviolet light had twice as much PAL activity 3 hours after irradiation and 12 times as much PAL activity 20 hours after irradiation as the pods of the water-treated control. Increases in PAL activity and pisatin synthesis were not obtained with 4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen, xanthotoxin, or 366 nanometer light treatment alone. 4,5',8-Trimethylpsoralen in combination with the irradiation treatment (366 nanometers) enhanced the rate at which l-leucine is incorporated into various fractions of soluble proteins in excised pods 8 hours after treatment. This treatment decreased the rate at which orotic acid is incorporated into RNA. The increase in PAL activity induced by irradiated psoralens was prevented when 6-methylpurine (0.5 milligram per milliliter) or cycloheximide (10 micrograms per milliliter) was applied immediately following the irradiation period. Possible functions of psoralen compounds in plants are discussed.