Search

Background:  Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a promising new technology with the potential to fundamentally change workflows in the daily routine and provide new quantitative imaging information to improve clinical decision-making and patient management., Method:  The contents of this review are based on an unrestricted literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms "photon-counting CT", "photon-counting detector", "spectral CT", "computed tomography" as well as on the authors' own experience., Results:  The fundamental difference with respect to the currently established energy-integrating CT detectors is that PCD-CT allows for the counting of every single photon at the detector level. Based on the identified literature, PCD-CT phantom measurements and initial clinical studies have demonstrated that the new technology allows for improved spatial resolution, reduced image noise, and new possibilities for advanced quantitative image postprocessing., Conclusion:  For clinical practice, the potential benefits include fewer beam hardening artifacts, a radiation dose reduction, and the use of new or combinations of contrast agents. In particular, critical patient groups such as oncological, cardiovascular, lung, and head & neck as well as pediatric patient collectives benefit from the clinical advantages., Key Points:   · Photon-counting computed tomography (PCD-CT) is being used for the first time in routine clinical practice, enabling a significant dose reduction in critical patient populations such as oncology, cardiology, and pediatrics.. · Compared to conventional CT, PCD-CT enables a reduction in electronic image noise.. · Due to the spectral data sets, PCD-CT enables fully comprehensive post-processing applications.., Citation Format: · Hagen F, Soschynski M, Weis M et al. Photon-counting computed tomography - clinical application in oncological, cardiovascular, and pediatric radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 25 - 34., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To determine the conditions under which early hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becomes haemodynamically relevant., Methods and Results: The study included 100 patients (age: 81.5 ± 5.5 years; female 63%), thereof 50 patients with HALT. After anonymization and randomization, blinded readers measured maximum thrombus thickness per prosthesis (MT&#95;pr) and movement restriction (MR&#95;pr) on electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated whole heart cycle computed tomography angiography. These measurements were compared with echocardiographic mean pressure gradient (mPG), its increase from baseline (ΔmPG), and Doppler velocity index (DVI). Haemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD) was defined as mPG > 20 mmHg. Age, body mass index, valve type, valve size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and atrial fibrillation were considered as influencing factors. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only valve size (P = 0.001) and MT&#95;pr (P = 0.02) had a significant influence on mPG. In an interaction model, valve size moderated the effect of MT&#95;pr on mPG significantly (P = 0.004). Sub-group analysis stratified by valve sizes showed a strong correlation between MT&#95;pr and echocardiographic parameters for 23 mm valves (mPG: r = 0.57, ΔmPG: r = 0.68, DVI: r = 0.55, each with P < 0.001), but neither for 26 nor 29 mm valves (r < 0.2, P > 0.2 for all correlations). Six of seven prostheses with HVD had a 23 mm valve diameter, while one had 29 mm (P = 0.02)., Conclusion: Early HALT rarely causes significant mPG increase. Our study shows that valve size is a key factor influencing the haemodynamic impact of HALT. In small valve sizes, mPG is more likely to increase. Our study is the first to offer in vivo evidence supporting previous in vitro findings on this topic., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F.B.: Bayer Healthcare, speakers bureau and unrestricted research grant Siemens Healthineers, speakers bureau and unrestricted research grant, unrelated to this work. C.L.S.: Siemens Healthineers, unrestricted research grant, unrelated to this work. J.T.: funding by Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—TA 1438/1–2. T; speakers bureau Siemens Healthcare GmbH and speakers bureau Bayer AG, reviewer Universimed Cross Media Content GmbH and consultant Core Lab Black Forrest GmbH, all unrelated to this work. M.S.: electronic presentation sponsored by Bayer AG, unrelated to this work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Kidney transplantations are increasing due to demographic changes and are the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Non-vascular and vascular complications may occur in the early phase after transplantation and at later stages. Overall postoperative complications after renal transplantations occur in approximately 12 % to 25 % of renal transplant patients. In these cases, minimally invasive therapeutic interventions are essential to ensure long-term graft function. This review article focuses on the most critical vascular complications after renal transplantation and highlights current recommendations for interventional treatment., Method: A literature search was performed in PubMed using the search terms "kidney transplantation", "complications", and "interventional treatment". Furthermore, the 2022 annual report of the German Foundation for Organ Donation and the EAU guidelines for kidney transplantation (European Association of Urology) were considered., Results and Conclusion: Image-guided interventional techniques are favorable compared with surgical revision and should be used primarily for the treatment of vascular complications. The most common vascular complications after renal transplantation are arterial stenoses (3 %-12.5 %), followed by arterial and venous thromboses (0.1 %-8.2 %) and dissection (0.1 %). Less frequently, arteriovenous fistulas or pseudoaneurysms occur. In these cases, minimally invasive interventions show a low complication rate and good technical and clinical results. Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up should be performed in an interdisciplinary approach at highly specialized centers to ensure the preservation of graft function. Surgical revision should be considered only after exhausting minimally invasive therapeutic strategies., Key Points: · Vascular complications after renal transplantation occur in 3 % to 15 % of patients.. · Image-guided interventional procedures should be performed primarily to treat vascular complications of renal transplantation.. · Minimally invasive interventions have a low complication rate with good technical and clinical outcomes.., Citation Format: · Verloh N, Doppler M, Hagar MT et al. Interventional Management of Vascular Complications after Renal Transplantation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 495 - 504., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background Recently introduced photon-counting CT may improve noninvasive assessment of patients with high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in the detection of CAD compared with the reference standard of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with severe aortic valve stenosis and clinically indicated CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning were consecutively enrolled from August 2022 to February 2023. All participants were examined with a dual-source photon-counting CT scanner using a retrospective electrocardiography-gated contrast-enhanced UHR scanning protocol (tube voltage, 120 or 140 kV; collimation, 120 × 0.2 mm; 100 mL of iopromid; no spectral information). Subjects underwent ICA as part of their clinical routine. A consensus assessment of image quality (five-point Likert scale: 1 = excellent [absence of artifacts], 5 = nondiagnostic [severe artifacts]) and a blinded independent reading for the presence of CAD (stenosis ≥50%) were performed. UHR CCTA was compared with ICA using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Among 68 participants (mean age, 81 years ± 7 [SD]; 32 male, 36 female), the prevalence of CAD and prior stent placement was 35% and 22%, respectively. The overall image quality was excellent (median score, 1.5 [IQR, 1.3-2.0]). The AUC of UHR CCTA in the detection of CAD was 0.93 per participant (95% CI: 0.86, 0.99), 0.94 per vessel (95% CI: 0.91, 0.98), and 0.92 per segment (95% CI: 0.87, 0.97). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, were 96%, 84%, and 88% per participant ( n = 68); 89%, 91%, and 91% per vessel ( n = 204); and 77%, 95%, and 95% per segment ( n = 965). Conclusion UHR photon-counting CCTA provided high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of CAD in a high-risk population, including subjects with severe coronary calcification or prior stent placement. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Williams and Newby in this issue.

Background: Coronary CT angiography (cCTA) is a class 1 recommendation in the current guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for excluding significant coronary artery stenosis. To achieve optimal image quality at a low radiation dose, the imaging physician may choose different acquisition modes. Therefore, the consensus guidelines by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) provide helpful guidance for this procedure., Method: The article provides practical recommendations for the application and acquisition of cCTA based on the current literature and our own experience., Results and Conclusion: According to current ESC guidelines, cCTA is recommended in symptomatic patients with a low or intermediate clinical likelihood for coronary artery disease. We recommend premedication with beta blockers and nitrates prior to CT acquisition under certain conditions even with the latest CT scanner generations. The most current CT scanners offer three possible scan modes for cCTA acquisition. Heart rate is the main factor for selecting the scan mode. Other factors may be coronary calcifications and body mass index (BMI)., Key Points: · CCTA is a valid method to exclude coronary artery disease in patients with a low to intermediate clinical likelihood.. · Even with the latest generation CT scanners, premedication with beta blockers and nitrates can improve image quality at low radiation exposure.. · Current CT scanners usually provide retrospective ECG gating and prospective ECG triggering. Dual-source scanners additionally provide a "high pitch" scan mode to scan the whole heart during one heartbeat, which may also be achieved using single-source scanners with broad detectors in some cases.. · Besides the available scanner technology, the choice of scan mode primarily depends on heart rate and heart rate variability (e. g., arrhythmia).., Citation Format: · Soschynski M, Hagar MT, Taron J et al. Update for the Performance of CT Coronary Angiography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 613 - 624., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)