Search

Brain injury in the perinatal period occurs in many clinical settings, e.g. hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in term infants, neonatal stroke, encephalopathy of prematurity, and infections. These insults often result in life-long disabilities including cerebral palsy, cognitive deficits, visual dysfunction, hearing impairments, and epilepsy. However, the success of clinical implementation of a broad array of potential neuroprotective strategies tested experimentally has been limited with the exception of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) used within hours of birth in term human babies with mild to moderate HIE. There is an extensive search for adjuvant therapeutic approaches to enhance the outcomes. One strategy is to modify susceptibility in the developing CNS by means of preconditioning or postconditioning using sublethal stress. The pre-clinical and clinical literature has shown that CNS immaturity at the time of ischemic insult plays a central role in the response to injury. Thus, better understanding of the molecular regulation of the endogenous vulnerability of the immature brain is needed. Further, the use of sublethal stressors of different origin may help shed light on mechanistic similarities and distinctions beween conditioning strategies. In this review we discuss the mechanisms of protection that are achieved by an interplay of changes on the systemic level and brain level, and via changes of intracellular and mitochondrial signaling. We also discuss the barriers to improving our understanding of how brain immaturity and the type of insult-hypoxic, ischemic or inflammatory-affect the efficacy of conditioning efforts in the immature brain.

Brain injury in the perinatal period occurs in many clinical settings, e.g. hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in term infants, neonatal stroke, encephalopathy of prematurity, and infections. These insults often result in life-long disabilities including cerebral palsy, cognitive deficits, visual dysfunction, hearing impairments, and epilepsy. However, the success of clinical implementation of a broad array of potential neuroprotective strategies tested experimentally has been limited with the exception of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) used within hours of birth in term human babies with mild to moderate HIE. There is an extensive search for adjuvant therapeutic approaches to enhance the outcomes. One strategy is to modify susceptibility in the developing CNS by means of preconditioning or postconditioning using sublethal stress. The pre-clinical and clinical literature has shown that CNS immaturity at the time of ischemic insult plays a central role in the response to injury. Thus, better understanding of the molecular regulation of the endogenous vulnerability of the immature brain is needed. Further, the use of sublethal stressors of different origin may help shed light on mechanistic similarities and distinctions beween conditioning strategies. In this review we discuss the mechanisms of protection that are achieved by an interplay of changes on the systemic level and brain level, and via changes of intracellular and mitochondrial signaling. We also discuss the barriers to improving our understanding of how brain immaturity and the type of insult-hypoxic, ischemic or inflammatory-affect the efficacy of conditioning efforts in the immature brain.

Inflammation is increasingly recognized as being a critical contributor to both normal development and injury outcome in the immature brain. The focus of this Review is to highlight important differences in innate and adaptive immunity in immature versus adult brain, which support the notion that the consequences of inflammation will be entirely different depending on context and stage of CNS development. Perinatal brain injury can result from neonatal encephalopathy and perinatal arterial ischaemic stroke, usually at term, but also in preterm infants. Inflammation occurs before, during and after brain injury at term, and modulates vulnerability to and development of brain injury. Preterm birth, on the other hand, is often a result of exposure to inflammation at a very early developmental phase, which affects the brain not only during fetal life, but also over a protracted period of postnatal life in a neonatal intensive care setting, influencing critical phases of myelination and cortical plasticity. Neuroinflammation during the perinatal period can increase the risk of neurological and neuropsychiatric disease throughout childhood and adulthood, and is, therefore, of concern to the broader group of physicians who care for these individuals.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate neuronal injury and immuno-inflammatory biomarkers in umbilical cord blood (UCB) at birth, in cases with perinatal asphyxia with or without hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), compared with healthy controls and to assess their ability to predict HIE. Study Design: In this case-control study, term infants with perinatal asphyxia were recruited at birth. UCB was stored at delivery for batch analysis. HIE was diagnosed by clinical Sarnat staging at 24 h. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), the neuronal biomarkers tau and neurofilament light protein (NFL), and a panel of cytokines were analyzed in a total of 150 term neonates: 50 with HIE, 50 with asphyxia without HIE (PA), and 50 controls. GFAP, tau, and NFL concentrations were measured using ultrasensitive single-molecule array (Simoa) assays, and a cytokine screening panel was applied to analyze the immuno-inflammatory and infectious markers. Results: GFAP, tau, NFL, and several cytokines were significantly higher in newborns with moderate and severe HIE compared to a control group and provided moderate prediction of HIE II/III (AUC: 0.681–0.827). Furthermore, the levels of GFAP, tau, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were higher in HIE II/III cases compared with cases with PA/HIE I. IL-6 was also higher in HIE II/III compared with HIE I cases. Conclusions: Biomarkers of brain injury and inflammation were increased in umbilical blood in cases with asphyxia. Several biomarkers were higher in HIE II/III versus those with no HIE or HIE I, suggesting that they could assist in the prediction of HIE II/III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A clinical challenge remains in the treatment of hypoxic–ischemic brain injury in newborns. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) has beneficial effects in animal models of adult stroke. Here, we aimed to understand the short- and long-term neuroprotective effects of NAD+-promoting substance nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) in a well-established brain injury model in neonatal mice. Postnatal day (PND) 9 male and female mice were subjected to cerebral hypoxia–ischemia and treated with saline or NMN (50 mg/kg) immediately after hypoxia–ischemia. At different time points after hypoxia–ischemia, hippocampal NAD+, caspase-3 activity, protein expression of SIRT1, SIRT6, release of high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), long-term neuropathological outcome, short-term developmental behavior, and long-term motor and memory function were evaluated. Neonatal hypoxia–ischemia reduced NAD+ and SIRT6 levels, but not SIRT1, in the injured hippocampus, while HMGB1 release was significantly increased. NMN treatment normalized hippocampal NAD+ and SIRT6 levels, while caspase-3 activity and HMGB1 release were significantly reduced. NMN alleviated tissue loss in the long-term and improved early developmental behavior, as well as motor and memory function. This study shows that NMN treatment provides neuroprotection in a clinically relevant neonatal animal model of hypoxia–ischemia in mice suggesting as a possible novel treatment for neonatal brain injury. Summary Statement: Neonatal hypoxia–ischemia reduces nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) and SIRT6 levels in the injured hippocampus. Hippocampal high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) release is significantly increased after neonatal hypoxia–ischemia. Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) treatment normalizes hippocampal NAD+ and SIRT6 levels, with significant decrease in caspase-3 activity and HMGB1 release. NMN improves early developmental behavior, as well as motor and memory function. Graphical Abstract This is a visual representation of the abstract. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The risk of perinatal death and severe neonatal morbidity increases gradually after 41 weeks of pregnancy. Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed if induction of labour (IOL) in uncomplicated pregnancies at 41 weeks will improve perinatal outcomes. We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) on this subject. Methods and findings We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase), The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO on February 21, 2020 for RCTs comparing IOL at 41 weeks with expectant management until 42 weeks in women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Individual participant data (IPD) were sought from eligible RCTs. Primary outcome was a composite of severe adverse perinatal outcomes: mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Additional outcomes included neonatal admission, mode of delivery, perineal lacerations, and postpartum haemorrhage. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted for parity (nulliparous/multiparous), maternal age ( From 89 full-text articles, we identified three eligible RCTs (n = 5,161), and two contributed with IPD (n = 4,561). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups regarding age, parity, BMI, and higher level of education. IOL resulted overall in a decrease of severe adverse perinatal outcome (0.4% [10/2,281] versus 1.0% [23/2,280]; relative risk [RR] 0.43 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 to 0.91], p-value 0.027, risk difference [RD] -57/10,000 [95% CI -106/10,000 to -8/10,000], I.sup.2 0%). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 175 (95% CI 94 to 1,267). Perinatal deaths occurred in one ( Prespecified subgroup analyses for the primary outcome showed a significant difference in the treatment effect (p = 0.01 for interaction) for parity, but not for maternal age or BMI. The risk of severe adverse perinatal outcome was decreased for nulliparous women in the IOL group (0.3% [4/1,219] versus 1.6% [20/1,264]; RR 0.20 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.60], p-value 0.004, RD -127/10,000, [95% CI -204/10,000 to -50/10,000], I.sup.2 0%, NNT 79 [95% CI 49 to 201]) but not for multiparous women (0.6% [6/1,219] versus 0.3% [3/1,264]; RR 1.59 [95% CI 0.15 to 17.30], p-value 0.35, RD 27/10,000, [95% CI -29/10,000 to 84/10,000], I.sup.2 55%). A limitation of this IPD-MA was the risk of overestimation of the effect on perinatal mortality due to early stopping of the largest included trial for safety reasons after the advice of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Furthermore, only two RCTs were eligible for the IPD-MA; thus, the possibility to assess severe adverse neonatal outcomes with few events was limited. Conclusions In this study, we found that, overall, IOL at 41 weeks improved perinatal outcome compared with expectant management until 42 weeks without increasing the cesarean delivery rate. This benefit is shown only in nulliparous women, whereas for multiparous women, the incidence of mortality and morbidity was too low to demonstrate any effect. The magnitude of risk reduction of perinatal mortality remains uncertain. Women with pregnancies approaching 41 weeks should be informed on the risk differences according to parity so that they are able to make an informed choice for IOL at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks. Study Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020163174, Author(s): Mårten Alkmark 1,2,*, Judit K. J. Keulen 3, Joep C. Kortekaas 4, Christina Bergh 5,6, Jeroen van Dillen 4, Ruben G. Duijnhoven 3, Henrik Hagberg 1,2, Ben Willem Mol [...]