Search

BACKGROUND. Current guidelines recommend visual evaluation of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on all nongated noncontrast chest CT examinations. However, chest CT examinations are often performed with contrast material administration. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate diagnostic performance, prognostic utility, and interobserver agreement of visual CAC assessment on chest CT performed for other indications. METHODS. This retrospective study included 260 patients (158 men, 102 women; mean age, 60 ± 11 [SD] years) who underwent both nongated chest CT (contrast-enhanced in 116 patients; noncontrast in 144 patients) and cardiac calcium score CT within a 12-month interval. A cardiothoracic radiologist visually assessed CAC on chest CT using an ordinal scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe). Cardiac CT Agatston calcium scores were quantified according to established guidelines and were categorized as CAC absent (0), mild CAC (1-99), moderate CAC (100-299), or severe CAC (≥ 300). The diagnostic performance of chest CT for the presence of CAC was assessed using cardiac CT as the reference standard. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed as a composite of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction and were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. A second cardiothoracic radiologist performed visual CAC assessments in a random subset of 50 chest CT examinations to assess interob-server agreement. RESULTS. For the presence of any CAC on cardiac CT, contrast-enhanced and non-contrast chest CT had sensitivity of 83% (62/75) and 89% (85/95) ( p = .20) and specificity of 100% (41/41) and 100% (49/49) ( p = .99). CAC present on cardiac CT was misclassified as absent on 13 contrast-enhanced and 10 noncontrast chest CT examinations; Agatston score was less than 30 in all such patients, and none experienced any MACE. The visual ordinal CAC score was associated with MACE for contrast-enhanced chest CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.5 [95% CI, 1.2-16.4], p = .02) and noncontrast chest CT (HR = 3.4 [95% CI, 1.5-7.8], p = .003). Interobserver agreement was excellent for contrast-enhanced (κ = 0.89) and noncontrast (κ = 0.95) chest CT. CONCLUSION. Visual ordinal CAC assessment on both contrast-enhanced and non-contrast chest CT has high diagnostic performance, prognostic utility, and interobserver agreement. CLINICAL IMPACT. Routine reporting of CAC on all chest CT examinations regardless of clinical indication and contrast material administration could identify a large number of patients with previously unknown CAC who might benefit from preventive treatment.

Objective:: To describe dynamic 18 F-flumethycholine PET (dPET) and dynamic contrast enhancement MR (DCE MR) parameters in localized high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), and determine whether these differ from normal prostate. Furthermore, to determine whether a correlation exists between dPET and DCE MR parameters., Methods:: 41 consenting patients who underwent prostate DCE MR and dPET were included in this institutionally approved study. Intraprostatic lesions on MR were assigned a PI-RADS v2 score, and focal lesions on PET were documented. All lesions were correlated with pathology. Quantitative and semi-quantitative DCE MR and two-tissue compartmental model dPET parameters were determined and tumor-to-normal gland ratios (T/N) for these parameters were calculated. Finally, dPET and DCE MR correlation was estimated using Spearman correlation coefficients., Results:: There were 46 malignant lesions per standard of reference. On dPET, peripheral zone (PZ) tumors had higher K1 (p < 0.001), and a T/N ratio ≥2 was significant (p < 0.001). On DCE MR, the parameters in, kep, Ktrans and quantitative iAUC were higher for PZ and non-PZ tumors than corresponding normal tissue (p < 0.001); for PZ tumors, a T/N ratio ≥ 1.5 for Ktrans and pei was significant (p = 0.0019 and 0.0026, respectively). Moderate Spearman correlation (0.40 < ρ < 0.59) was found between dPET K1 and DCE MR Ktrans and pei., Conclusion:: In patients with high-risk PCa, quantitative dPET and DCE-MR parameters in primary tumors differ from normal tissue. Only moderate correlation exists between K1 (dPET) and Ktrans and pei (DCE MR). The incremental value of any of these parameters to PI-RADS v2 warrants further investigation., Advances in Knowledge:: Unique quantitative and semi-quantitative FCH PET/MR parameters in PCa differ from normal gland, and should be further investigated to determine their potential contribution to PI-RADS v2 in the detection of clinically significant PCa.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether integrated 18 F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET whole-body MRI (PET/WBMRI) depicts lymph node and distant metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer more frequently than does conventional staging., Subjects and Methods: A prospective study included 58 patients with untreated high-risk prostate cancer. After conventional staging (CT and bone scintigraphy), patients underwent FCH PET/WBMRI (n = 10) or FCH PET/CT and WBMRI (n = 48). Metastatic sites and disease stage were recorded for each modality (conventional imaging, PET, WBMRI, and PET/WBMRI) and compared with a standard of reference (histopathologic examination, imaging, and clinical follow-up) and early clinical outcomes., Results: In the detection of metastases, PET had significantly higher sensitivity (72/77 [93.5%]) than conventional imaging (49/77 [63.6%]; p < 0.001) and WBMRI (56/77 [72.7%]; p = 0.002). There was a trend toward improved detection with PET/WBMRI (77/77 [100%]) compared with PET alone (p = 0.059). For correct NM staging, PET and PET/WBMRI performed better than conventional imaging (p = 0.002) and WBMRI (p = 0.008). Twelve of 56 patients (21.4%) had early biochemical failure after radical treatment (median, 7 months; range, 1-20 months). This rate was higher for patients with M1a or M1b disease at PET/WBMRI than for others, but this finding did not reach statistical significance (4/8 [50%] vs 8/48 [16.7%]; p = 0.055)., Conclusion: In patients with high-risk prostate cancer, FCH PET and FCH PET/WBMRI depict significantly more metastatic lesions than do conventional imaging and WBMRI. Stage determined with PET/WBMRI may correlate with early outcomes.

Objective: The objective of our study was to assess the association between colorectal liver metastases and intrahepatic bile duct dilatation and compare its frequency with the frequency of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation in other common noncolorectal metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the radiology database was performed to obtain the records of patients who underwent CT for staging of histologically proven colorectal carcinoma (n = 1,000), noncolorectal carcinomas (n = 1,000), and HCC (n = 226). The CT scans of the 2,226 patients were reviewed for the presence of liver metastases and masses, the presence of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation directly related to the masses, the size of the largest lesion, and the associated caliber of the dilated intrahepatic bile duct., Results: Of the 297 patients with colorectal liver metastases, 49 (16.5%) had intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, whereas of the 263 patients with noncolorectal liver metastases, only eight (3%) had dilated ducts. Thirteen (5.7%) of the 226 patients with HCC had intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. Intrahepatic bile duct dilatation was present in significantly more patients with colorectal liver metastases (p < 0.05) than those with noncolorectal and HCC metastases. The mean sizes of the lesions and mean caliber of the dilated bile duct from colorectal metastases, noncolorectal metastases, and HCC were 5.3, 3.9, and 5.6 cm, respectively, and 5.1, 4.6, and 4.8 mm, respectively. Overall lesion size irrespective of diagnosis had no significant correlation with the probability of bile duct dilatation (p = 0.16; odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.97-1.20). Lesion size also did not have a significantly different effect on the probability of dilatation for the three diagnoses (p = 0.71). The caliber of bile duct dilatation did not significantly differ among the three groups of patients by diagnosis (p = 0.70)., Conclusion: Colorectal liver metastases have a significantly higher tendency to cause intrahepatic bile duct dilatation than noncolorectal metastases and HCC due to the characteristic features, such as cholangiocarcinoma, of intrabiliary growth. This association has important diagnostic, surgical, and prognostic implications that make it necessary to highlight this finding while communicating with clinical colleagues.