39 results on '"Hamnerius, N."'
Search Results
2. Prevalence of dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis from medical devices used by children and adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and questionnaire study.
- Author
-
von Kobyletzki, L. B., Ulriksdotter, J., Sukakul, T., Aerts, O., Agner, T., Buhl, T., Bruze, M., Foti, C., Gimenez‐Arnau, A., Gonçalo, M., Hamnerius, N., Johansen, J. D., Rustemeyer, T., Stingeni, L., Wilkinson, M., and Svedman, C.
- Subjects
INSULIN pumps ,TYPE 1 diabetes ,CONTACT dermatitis ,ECZEMA ,MEDICAL equipment ,CINAHL database ,DELAYED diagnosis - Abstract
Use of medical devices (MDs), that is, glucose sensors and insulin pumps, in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) has proven an enormous advantage for disease control. Adverse skin reactions from these MDs may however hamper compliance. The objective of this study was to systematically review and analyse studies assessing the prevalence and incidence of dermatitis, including allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) related to MDs used in patients with T1D and to compare referral routes and the clinical investigation routines between clinics being part of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG). A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases of full‐text studies reporting incidence and prevalence of dermatitis in persons with T1D using MDs was conducted until December 2021. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. The inventory performed at EECRDG clinics focused on referral routes, patient numbers and the diagnostic process. Among the 3145 screened abstracts, 39 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies included data on children only, 14 studies were on adults and nine studies reported data on both children and adults. Participants were exposed to a broad range of devices. Skin reactions were rarely specified. It was found that both the diagnostic process and referral routes differ in different centres. Further data on the prevalence of skin reactions related to MDs in individuals with T1D is needed and particularly studies where the skin reactions are correctly diagnosed. A correct diagnosis is delayed or hampered by the fact that, at present, the actual substances within the MDs are not declared, are changed without notice and the commercially available test materials are not adequately updated. Within Europe, routines for referral should be made more standardized to improve the diagnostic procedure when investigating patients with possible ACD from MDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Wet work exposure and hand eczema among healthcare workers: a cross‐sectional study
- Author
-
Hamnerius, N., Svedman, C., Bergendorff, O., Björk, J., Bruze, M., and Pontén, A.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Continuous glucose monitoring systems give contact dermatitis in children and adults despite efforts of providing less ‘allergy‐ prone’ devices: investigation and advice hampered by insufficient material for optimized patch test investigations
- Author
-
Svedman, C., primary, Bruze, M., additional, Antelmi, A., additional, Hamnerius, N., additional, Hauksson, I., additional, Ulriksdotter, J., additional, and Mowitz, M., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Skin Exposures, Hand Eczema and Facial Skin Disease in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study
- Author
-
Hamnerius, N, primary, Pontén, A, additional, Bergendorff, O, additional, Bruze, M, additional, Björk, J, additional, and Svedman, C, additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Pedal dermatophyte infection in psoriasis
- Author
-
HAMNERIUS, N., BERGLUND, J., and FAERGEMANN, J.
- Published
- 2004
7. Allergic contact dermatitis from dicyclohexylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate (HMDI)
- Author
-
Frick, M., Björkner, B., and Hamnerius, N.
- Published
- 2002
8. 在潮湿环境下工作的医护人员的手部湿疹问题:一项横断面研究
- Author
-
Hamnerius, N., primary, Svedman, C., additional, Bergendorff, O., additional, Björk, J., additional, Bruze, M., additional, and Pontén, A., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Banded Scalp Hair with an Unusual Glistening Appearance in a Teenager: A Quiz
- Author
-
Theodosiou, G, primary, Hamnerius, N, additional, and Svensson, �, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Wet work exposure and hand eczema among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study
- Author
-
Hamnerius, N., primary, Svedman, C., additional, Bergendorff, O., additional, Björk, J., additional, Bruze, M., additional, and Pontén, A., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Naevoid Malignant Melanoma: A Diagnosis of a Naevus That You Later Regret
- Author
-
Theodosiou, G, primary, Johansson, I, additional, Hamnerius, N, additional, and Svensson, Å, additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. [Is occupational allergic contact dermatitis within the armed forces an unrecognized problem?]
- Author
-
Svedman C, Källberg K, Hamnerius N, and Wikström U
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Adhesives adverse effects, Patch Tests, Young Adult, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Military Personnel
- Abstract
In the armed forces, marching still remains a major component in the training of the young recruits. In the following we describe a young recruit who, following instructions, prophylactically used adhesives to prevent chafing. The recruit developed an allergic contact dermatitis with generalized spreading. The adhesive products recommended are sold on a global market and are extensively used. Allergic contact dermatitis from these products have so far only been reported from Sweden. Unfortunately, even though the first cases were reported some years ago, new cases are still diagnosed. When medical devices are recommended to be used on the skin for a prolonged time and under extreme conditions, sensitization and a subsequent allergic contact dermatitis must be considered.
- Published
- 2024
13. Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate in ostomy patients.
- Author
-
Siemund I, Dahlin J, Mowitz M, Hamnerius N, and Svedman C
- Subjects
- Humans, Acrylates adverse effects, Allergens adverse effects, Patch Tests methods, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Ostomy adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Many people live with ostomies after life-saving surgery. Ostomy patients often suffer from peristomal dermatitis. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has been reported, mostly due to contact allergy (CA) to topical agents., Objectives: We present three patients with therapy resistant peristomal dermatitis, suggesting ACD caused by different stoma products., Methods: Patch testing was performed with baseline series, additional series, and selected allergens. They were also tested with their own ostomy products as is and separate extracts of the products. Extracts were analysed using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)., Results: In all three patients we diagnosed CA to 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA), +++ in case (C) 1 and 3, ++ in C 2. HDDA was detected in C 2's ostomy pouch adhesive and in C 1's and 3's flange extenders used to improve the adhesion of the ostomy pouches., Conclusion: Therapy resistant peristomal dermatitis should always be suspected of ACD and patch testing, especially with the patient's own products, should be performed., (© 2024 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Colophonium-related Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Medical Adhesive Tape Used to Prevent Skin Lesions in Soldiers.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N, Dahlin J, Bruze M, Nilsson K, Sukakul T, and Svedman C
- Subjects
- Humans, Resins, Plant adverse effects, Patch Tests methods, Allergens adverse effects, Military Personnel, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact epidemiology, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology
- Abstract
Medical adhesive tapes are commonly recommended for the prevention of friction blisters during hiking and military marches. The aim of this paper is to report on the results of investigations into an outbreak of tape-related foot dermatitis in 26 military conscripts following continuous use of medical adhesive tapes for several days during a field exercise. Patch tests were performed using baseline series and aimed testing was performed with colophonium-related substances and different medical adhesive tapes. Contact allergy to the adhesive tapes used was found in 20 (77%) subjects, and contact allergy to colophonium in 16 (61%). Chemical analysis detected colophonium-related substances in the culprit tapes. Compared with consecutive dermatitis patients investigated at our Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in the previous 10 years, conscripts with colophonium allergy had increased odds ratios for concomitant contact allergy to phenol formaldehyde resins and fragrance substances including hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool. The results show that prolonged use of medical adhesive tapes on intact skin carries a high risk for allergic contact dermatitis. Prior to their introduction on the market, medical devices should be assessed for possible side-effects.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis induced by adhesives used for prevention of chafing in the military forces-A case report.
- Author
-
Svedman C, Dahlin J, Hamnerius N, Adwa UNAR, and Bruze M
- Subjects
- Humans, Adhesives adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact prevention & control, Dermatitis, Occupational prevention & control, Dermatitis, Occupational complications, Military Personnel
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Should acetophenone azine be inserted in a baseline patch test series?
- Author
-
Bruze M, Antelmi A, Dahlin J, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Hindsén M, Isaksson M, Lejding T, Mowitz M, Svedman C, and Bergendorff O
- Subjects
- Humans, Patch Tests, Allergens, Acetophenones, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Contact allergy investigations in healthcare workers with face mask-related skin disease.
- Author
-
Brynolf A, Hauksson I, Bergendorff O, Svedman C, and Hamnerius N
- Subjects
- Humans, Pandemics, Masks adverse effects, Patch Tests methods, Health Personnel, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact epidemiology, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Dermatitis, Occupational epidemiology, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Facial Dermatoses epidemiology, Facial Dermatoses etiology
- Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of face masks has increased among healthcare workers (HCWs). Questionnaire studies have shown a high frequency of self-reported facial adverse skin reactions. Case reports have been published on face mask-induced allergic contact dermatitis and urticaria., Objectives: To describe the results of the contact allergy investigations in consecutive HCWs investigated for skin reactions to face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic and the results of the chemical investigations of face masks supplied by the hospital., Methods: Participants were patch tested with baseline series and chemicals previously reported in face masks not included in the baseline series. Face mask(s) brought by the HCW were tested as is and/or in acetone extract. Chemical analyses were performed on nine different face masks for potential allergens., Results: Fifty-eight HCWs were investigated. No contact allergies were found to the face mask(s) tested. Eczema was the most common type of skin reaction, followed by an acneiform reaction. Colophonium-related substances were found in one respirator and 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) were found in two respirators., Conclusion: Based on this report, contact allergies to face masks is uncommon. Patch test with colophonium-related substances and BHT should be considered when investigating adverse skin reactions to face masks., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Active sensitization to dimethylthiocarbamylbenzothiazol sulphide: An unexpectedly strong rubber contact allergen.
- Author
-
Isaksson M, Bergendorff O, Hamnerius N, Pontén A, Svedman C, Hauksson I, and Bruze M
- Subjects
- Humans, Rubber adverse effects, Allergens adverse effects, Patch Tests adverse effects, Sulfides adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology
- Abstract
Background: The two dialkylthiocarbamyl benzothiazole sulphides, dimethyl-thiocarbamylbenzothiazole sulphide (DMTBS) and diethylthio-carbamylbenzothiazole sulphide (DETBS) were shown to be good markers of both thiuram and mercaptobenzothiazole sensitivity., Objectives: To investigate if DMTBS and/or DETBS could be better markers of contact allergy to common rubber additives than the ones currently used., Methods: Sixty-eight dermatitis patients were patch tested with DMTBS and DETBS, both at 1% in petrolatum (pet). Because of late reactions in 10 patients, these were retested to DMTBS and DETBS in serial dilutions. Tetramethylthiuram monosulphide (TMTM) 1.0% pet was also tested., Results: At the initial reading Days 3 and 7, no reactions were noted to DMTBS or DETBS. At retesting, 10 of the 68 (15%) patients reacted positively to lower concentrations of DMTBS than the initial test concentration. Seven of 8 also reacted to TMTM. Three of them had positive reactions to DEBTS. All 10 patients had reactions to more diluted solutions to DMBTS than to DEBTS (p = 0.0077; Mc-Nemar test, two-sided)., Conclusions: Results speak for patch test sensitization to DMTBS with cross-reactivity to TMTM and also DEBTS. DMTBS and DEBTS could be new markers of rubber allergy but a safe test concentration must be found., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new insulin pump system containing isobornyl acrylate.
- Author
-
Enberg J, Hamnerius N, and Mowitz M
- Subjects
- Humans, Acrylates, Camphanes, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring adverse effects, Patch Tests adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Insulins
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. The use of carvone in consecutive patch testing.
- Author
-
Enberg J, Hamnerius N, Kroona L, and Svedman C
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Patch Tests adverse effects, Retrospective Studies, Allergens adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact epidemiology, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Perfume adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Carvone (l-carvone) is a mint-tasting flavour additive that most of us is exposed to and can cause allergic contact reactions., Objectives: To analyse the frequency and the relevance of positive carvone reactions in a dermatitis population., Method: A retrospective analysis of dermatitis patients consecutively tested with carvone from 2017 to 2021. Data were retrieved from the department's patch-test database., Results: Of 3554 patients tested with carvone, 28 (0.79%) had a positive reaction. Carvone-positive patients had higher mean age, were significantly more likely female (p < 0.001) and had often an intraoral/lip involvement (p < 0.001). In the carvone-positive group, 50% (n = 14) had a relevant reaction, and in 4 of 14, the relevance was first revealed after test reading. Of the carvone-positive patients, 18 of 28 did not have a coexisting allergy to a fragrance/flavour allergen and of these 44% had a relevant allergy., Conclusions: The study suggests that a significant fraction of relevant carvone contact allergies may be overlooked if the allergen is not tested. Furthermore, as the exposure is widespread, inclusion of carvone in the Swedish baseline series may be justified even if the contact allergy prevalence is below 1%., (© 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes: An update from southern Sweden.
- Author
-
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Antelmi A, Boonchai W, Dahlin J, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Lejding T, and Svedman C
- Subjects
- Allergens adverse effects, Biomarkers, Humans, Odorants, Patch Tests methods, Pharmaceutical Vehicles, Retrospective Studies, Sweden epidemiology, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact epidemiology, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Perfume adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Regularly updating the prevalence of fragrance contact allergy (CA) is important. Patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes (FMs) is still debated., Objectives: To update the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with fragrance CA. To establish the results of patch testing with individual allergens of FMs., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 3539 patients with dermatitis who were patch tested with the baseline series and FMs ingredients during 2016 to 2020 was performed., Results: The prevalence of fragrance CA was 13%. About 10% of these patients with fragrance CA would be missed if the individual ingredients were not tested. Unlike hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, there was no decreasing trend of CA to Evernia prunastri (oakmoss) extract after the EU regulation came into force. Patients with CA from only one ingredient of the mixes or having a weak positive reaction to the ingredients were significantly missed when tested with only the fragrance markers in the baseline series., Conclusions: Patch testing with individual fragrance allergens is crucial for experts to expand knowledge in the fragrance CA field. The concentrations of the allergens in FMs may need to be adjusted to detect patients with fragrance CA, since some were significantly overlooked., (© 2022 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Contact allergy to oxidized linalool and oxidized limonene: Patch testing in consecutive patients with dermatitis.
- Author
-
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Antelmi A, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Dahlin J, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Isaksson M, Lejding T, Pontén A, and Svedman C
- Subjects
- Adult, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxidation-Reduction, Retrospective Studies, Terpenes adverse effects, Acyclic Monoterpenes adverse effects, Allergens adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Patch Tests methods
- Abstract
Background: Contact allergy to oxidized (ox.) linalool and ox. limonene has been reported to have a high prevalence, raising the question of inclusion into the baseline series. However, several important issues should be clarified and further investigated before inclusion can be warranted., Objectives: To report the trends of ox. terpenes allergy in patients with dermatitis, features of the patch test reactions, and clinical characteristics of the patients., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 5773 patients was performed. All patients were patch tested with baseline series, individual ingredients of fragrance mix I and II, ox. linalool, and ox. limonene from 2013 to 2020., Results: The prevalence rates of contact allergy to ox. linalool and ox. limonene were 7.0% and 5.1%, respectively. Significantly increasing trends of contact allergy were observed. More than 95% of contact allergy cases were identified on Day 3/4. Patients with contact allergy to ox. linalool and ox. limonene were significantly younger than those with contact allergy to other fragrances and were predominantly female. Strong reactions were associated with older age and multiple fragrance allergies., Conclusions: Contact allergy to ox. linalool and ox. limonene is becoming increasingly important, and findings show intriguing features. More studies concerning the clinical relevance before recommending these substances for screening are required., (© 2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Contact Allergy to Two Aluminum Salts in Consecutively Patch-Tested Dermatitis Patients.
- Author
-
Siemund I, Dahlin J, Hindsén M, Zimerson E, Antelmi A, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Isaksson M, Pontén A, Mowitz M, Svedman C, and Bruze M
- Subjects
- Adult, Age Factors, Allergens administration & dosage, Aluminum Chloride administration & dosage, Aluminum Compounds adverse effects, Child, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Female, Humans, Intradermal Tests methods, Male, Risk Factors, Allergens adverse effects, Aluminum Chloride adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Patch Tests methods
- Abstract
Background: Recently, aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) 10.0% petrolatum (pet) was recommended for patch testing to detect aluminum contact allergy. Aluminum lactate (AL) may be as reliable a test substance as ACH., Objective: We aimed to investigate the frequencies of aluminum allergy when ACH and AL were used in patch testing consecutive patients., Methods: Petrolatum preparations of ACH 10.0% and AL 12.0% were added to the baseline series in 2010-2017. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate 10.0% pet was added to the children baseline series from July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017., Results: A total of 5448 patients were patch tested with the extended baseline series and 196 children with the extended children baseline series. Forty-eight of the 5448 adults (0.9%) and 10 of the 196 children (5.1%) were diagnosed with aluminum contact allergy. A significant difference was found between the aluminum allergy frequencies in children and adults patch tested with ACH in 2013-2017 (P < 0.001). The difference between the frequencies of contact allergies for the 2 aluminum salts is not statistically significant., Conclusions: Patch testing with ACH and AL demonstrated similar contact allergy frequencies. To detect aluminum allergy, patch testing with ACH 10.0% pet is recommended. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate 10.0% pet should be considered for inclusion in baseline series for patch testing adults and children., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Contact allergy to polyhexamethylene biguanide (polyaminopropyl biguanide).
- Author
-
Sukakul T, Dahlin J, Pontén A, Antelmi A, Bruze M, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Isaksson M, Lejding T, and Svedman C
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Biguanides chemistry, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact epidemiology, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Molecular Structure, Patch Tests, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies, Sweden epidemiology, Biguanides adverse effects, Cosmetics adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Preservatives, Pharmaceutical adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Polyaminopropyl biguanide (INCI name) and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) are polymeric biguanides. PHMB is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial substance used as a preservative in many products. Due to our limited knowledge on PHMB contact allergy frequency and the fact that cases of allergic contact dermatitis to PHMB might be missed, we have included PHMB as a screening allergen since 2016., Objective: To report the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to PHMB as a screening allergen in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1760 patch tested patients from July 2016 to December 2018 was performed. Polyaminopropyl biguanide 2.0% aqua was included in the extended Malmö baseline series during the study period., Results: Of all patients, 1204 (68.4%) were female. Positive patch test reactions were reported in 19 patients (1.1%). The most common sites of lesions were face, head, and neck (52.6%). There was a significant correlation between concomitant reactions to PHMB and other cosmetic-related allergens., Conclusion: The prevalence of positive reactions to PHMB was higher than that previously reported. Patch testing with PHMB should be performed in patients with dermatitis who have lesions on the face, head, and neck., (© 2020 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Latex and chlorhexidine IgE levels in Swedish healthcare workers † .
- Author
-
Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Bruze M, and Pontén A
- Subjects
- Anesthesia Department, Hospital, Chlorhexidine immunology, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Disinfectants immunology, Humans, Latex immunology, Latex Hypersensitivity diagnosis, Sweden, Chlorhexidine adverse effects, Dermatitis, Occupational immunology, Disinfectants adverse effects, Immunoglobulin E blood, Latex adverse effects, Latex Hypersensitivity immunology, Personnel, Hospital
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Intense skin reaction to a new glucose monitoring and insulin pump system.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N and Mowitz M
- Subjects
- Acrylates adverse effects, Adhesives adverse effects, Adult, Camphanes adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Female, Humans, Patch Tests, Resins, Plant adverse effects, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring adverse effects, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring instrumentation, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Insulin Infusion Systems adverse effects
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Patch testing with a textile dye mix with and without Disperse Orange 3.
- Author
-
Stenton J, Dahlin J, Antelmi A, Bruze M, Svedman C, Zimerson E, Hamnerius N, Pontén A, and Isaksson M
- Subjects
- Adult, Azo Compounds administration & dosage, Coloring Agents administration & dosage, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patch Tests methods, Azo Compounds adverse effects, Coloring Agents adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Textiles adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: The textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% pet. contains Disperse Blue (DB) 35, Disperse Yellow 3, Disperse Orange (DO) 1 and 3, Disperse Red 1 and 17, and DB 106 and 124. The most frequent allergen in TDM-positive patients is DO 3. Around 85% of p-phenylenediamine (PPD)-allergic dermatitis patients have shown positive patch test reactions to DO 3. There has been a discussion to exclude DO 3 from TDM 6.6% because of frequent, strong reactions to TDM 6.6% and PPD., Objectives: To study if DO 3 can be omitted from a TDM., Methods: Patch tests were performed on 2250 dermatitis patients with TDM 6.6%, TDM 5.6% pet., TDM 7.0% pet., and PPD 1.0% pet.; 122 patients were also patch tested with DO 3 1.0% pet., Results: Among the 2250 patients patch tested, contact allergy prevalence to TDM 6.6% was 2.4%, to TDM 5.6% 1.8%, and to TDM 7.0% 2.0%. Of the 54 TDM 6.6%-positive patients, 55.6% reacted to PPD; as much as 42.2% of PPD-allergic women and 50% of PPD-allergic men reacted to TDM 6.6%. Of the 17 DO 3-positive patients, 94.1% showed a positive reaction to PPD., Conclusion: Results indicate that DO 3 can probably be omitted from TDM, but patch testing with TDM 6.6%, TDM 7.0%, DO 3 1.0%, and PPD 1.0% simultaneously is needed to finally decide whether it is possible or not., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Two cases of contact allergic reactions to Finn Chamber AQUA test chambers.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N and Mowitz M
- Subjects
- Bandages adverse effects, Child, Female, Humans, Patch Tests, Adhesives adverse effects, Bandages, Hydrocolloid adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Skin exposure to the rubber accelerator diphenylguanidine in medical gloves-An experimental study.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N, Pontén A, Björk J, Persson C, and Bergendorff O
- Subjects
- Butadienes, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Dermatitis, Occupational, Ethanol, Hand Dermatoses, Hemiterpenes, Humans, Nitriles, Time Factors, Gloves, Surgical, Guanidines analysis, Hand Sanitizers, Occupational Exposure analysis, Sweating
- Abstract
Background: Dermatitis caused by occupational contact allergy to rubber additives such as diphenylguanidine (DPG) in medical gloves is a hazard for healthcare workers. Both the duration of exposure to medical gloves and the number of gloves used per day vary. The use of alcoholic skin disinfectants before glove donning is mandatory., Objectives: To assess whether skin exposure to the rubber accelerator DPG released from glove material is influenced by alcoholic hand disinfectants, time, and pH., Methods: With the use of ethanol washes, the amount of DPG left on the hands after wearing of gloves for 60 minutes was measured, and comparisons between hands exposed and not exposed to alcoholic disinfectant before glove donning were made. With the use of artificial sweat buffered at pH 4, 5, and 6, DPG release from the insides of gloves at different times was measured., Results: The use of alcoholic disinfectant prior to polyisoprene glove donning increased the amount of DPG recovered from the hands. Of the DPG released from polyisoprene gloves into artificial sweat, almost 84% was released within 10 minutes. pH did not influence the rate of release., Conclusions: The use of alcoholic disinfectant increased skin exposure to the rubber accelerator DPG. Even a short duration of use of gloves results in substantial exposure to DPG., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Dermatitis and occupational (meth)acrylate contact allergy in nail technicians-A 10-year study.
- Author
-
Fisch A, Hamnerius N, and Isaksson M
- Subjects
- Adult, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact epidemiology, Dermatitis, Occupational epidemiology, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Acrylates adverse effects, Cosmetics chemistry, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, Methacrylates adverse effects
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. N,N-dimethylacrylamide-A new sensitizer in the FreeStyle Libre glucose sensor.
- Author
-
Mowitz M, Herman A, Baeck M, Isaksson M, Antelmi A, Hamnerius N, Pontén A, and Bruze M
- Subjects
- Acrylates adverse effects, Adhesives chemistry, Adult, Aged, Camphanes adverse effects, Child, Disease Management, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Acrylamides adverse effects, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring instrumentation, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Diabetes Mellitus therapy
- Abstract
Background: Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) has recently been identified as one sensitizer in the FreeStyle Libre glucose sensor. Analyses with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) have indicated the presence of N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) in the sensor., Material and Methods: Seven patients were referred for patch testing after developing skin reactions when using FreeStyle Libre. All patients were patch tested with IBOA and DMAA. Two patients were tested with adhesive patches that had been removed from the sensors "as is," and two patients were tested with acetone extracts of materials from the sensor. The extracts were analysed with GC-MS., Results: Six patients reacted to both IBOA and DMAA, and one patient reacted only to DMAA. Positive reactions were also observed in both patients tested with the adhesive patch "as is". One patient reacted to both an extract of the adhesive patch and an extract of the sensor itself. When analysed with GC-MS, IBOA was found in both extracts and DMAA was found in the extract of the sensor., Conclusion: Both IBOA and DMAA may be present in adhesives used in medical devices such as glucose sensors or insulin pumps, and should be patch tested when suspected contact allergic reactions to these products are investigated., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Björk J, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, and Pontén A
- Subjects
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Eczema diagnosis, Female, Hand Dermatoses diagnosis, Humans, Latex Hypersensitivity diagnostic imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, Eczema etiology, Gloves, Protective adverse effects, Hand Dermatoses etiology, Health Personnel, Latex Hypersensitivity etiology
- Abstract
Background: Hand eczema (HE) in healthcare workers (HCWs) is common. Besides wet work, healthcare work also implies exposure to contact allergens., Objectives: To assess HE and contact allergy related to occupational exposures in HCWs., Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 311 HCWs with HE within the preceding 12 months and a control group of 114 HCWs without HE were investigated with the baseline series and a special patch test series based on substances found in the gloves, soaps, alcoholic hand disinfectants and hand creams provided at the hospitals., Results: Contact allergy to rubber additives was significantly more common in HCWs with HE (6%) than in HCWs without HE (1%, P = .02). The corresponding percentages for fragrances were 11% and 3%, respectively (P = .004). Occupational HE was found in 193 of 311 (62%) HCWs. Of these, 22 of 193 (11%) had occupational allergic contact dermatitis, including 17 with glove-related rubber contact allergy. Contact allergy to diphenylguanidine was as common as contact allergy to thiurams. Occupational contact allergy to rubber additives was significantly associated with sick-leave related to HE., Conclusion: Contact allergy to rubber additives in medical gloves is the most common cause of occupational allergic contact dermatitis in HCWs. Aimed patch testing with relevant rubber additives is mandatory when HE in HCWs is investigated., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Solvent Orange 60 is a potent contact sensitizer in occupational and everyday life.
- Author
-
Linauskienė K, Zimerson E, Antelmi A, Bruze M, Hagvall L, Hamnerius N, Hauksson I, Ryberg K, and Isaksson M
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Coloring Agents administration & dosage, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naphthalenes administration & dosage, Patch Tests, Retrospective Studies, Coloring Agents adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, Eyeglasses adverse effects, Naphthalenes adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Solvent Orange (SO) 60 is a perinone-type dye that is often used in plastic materials such as spectacle frames and has been shown to cause contact allergy. The first case of SO 60 allergic contact dermatitis caused by spectacle frames was reported in 1999, and the second in 2011. We have recently seen 10 patients, of whom 6 developed dermatitis in the retroauricular/temporal area after wearing plastic spectacles., Objectives: To report the cause of the dermatitis in the 10 patients and to describe our first case with occupational SO 60 contact allergy., Methods: In this retrospective study, patch test results of 10 patients, tested with the Swedish baseline series and our specific spectacle and/or plastic series, including SO 60 1.0% pet., in 2011-2017 were analysed., Results: Ten patients, 2 males and 8 females, aged 43 to 71 years, reacted positively to SO 60 1.0% pet., namely, 4 pensioners, 2 nurses, 1 office worker, 1 teacher, 1 shop assistant, and 1 unemployed person. Four of the patients had an atopic history. Patch test reactions varied from + to +++; some had spread >20 cm outside the test area in terms of erythematous, infiltrated skin with papules. Retesting of patient no. 1 with serial dilutions of SO 60 in acetone showed positive reactions down to 1 ppm. Three patients reacted to the extracts of their earpieces. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to confirm the presence of SO 60 in 2 earpieces., Conclusions: SO 60 should be included in any spectacle patch test series that may be used. If there is a strong suspicion of contact allergy to SO 60 before patch testing, lowering the test concentration from 1.0% to 0.01% should be considered., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Textile contact dermatitis caused by octylisothiazolinone in compression stockings.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N, Pontén A, and Mowitz M
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Male, Patch Tests, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Disinfectants adverse effects, Stockings, Compression, Thiazoles adverse effects
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in Freestyle® Libre, a newly introduced glucose sensor.
- Author
-
Herman A, Aerts O, Baeck M, Bruze M, De Block C, Goossens A, Hamnerius N, Huygens S, Maiter D, Tennstedt D, Vandeleene B, and Mowitz M
- Subjects
- Acrylates administration & dosage, Administration, Cutaneous, Blood Glucose analysis, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring instrumentation, Camphanes administration & dosage, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 blood, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Humans, Acrylates adverse effects, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring adverse effects, Camphanes adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology
- Abstract
Background: Glucose sensors, such as FreeStyle® Libre, are innovative medical devices developed for diabetes patients as a replacement for classic glucose meters, ensuring continuous glucose monitoring without the disadvantage of regular skin finger pricks., Objectives: To report several cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by FreeStyle® Libre, and to report on isobornyl acrylate as a culprit allergen., Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients presented with allergic contact dermatitis caused by FreeStyle® Libre. All but 1 were patch tested with a baseline series, and with pieces and/or ultrasonic bath extracts of (the adhesive part of) the glucose sensor. Isobornyl acrylate was patch tested, in various concentrations and vehicles, in 13 patients. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) of the sensors was performed., Results: All patients reacted to the adhesive part of the sensor, and 12 patients were shown to be sensitized to isobornyl acrylate. Simultaneous reactions to other allergens were rarely observed. GC-MS showed the presence of isobornyl acrylate in the sensors., Conclusions: Cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by FreeStyle® Libre are increasingly being observed, and isobornyl acrylate is a relevant culprit allergen. Cross-reactivity to other acrylates was infrequently observed, but other, hitherto unidentified, contact allergens may still be present in the device., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. The diagnosis you wish you had never operated on: Pyoderma gangrenosum misdiagnosed as necrotizing fasciitis-a case report.
- Author
-
Hradil E, Jeppsson C, Hamnerius N, and Svensson Å
- Subjects
- Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use, Fasciitis, Necrotizing drug therapy, Fasciitis, Necrotizing surgery, Humans, Male, Pyoderma Gangrenosum drug therapy, Pyoderma Gangrenosum surgery, Skin Transplantation, Surgical Wound Infection complications, Surgical Wound Infection microbiology, Diagnostic Errors adverse effects, Fasciitis, Necrotizing diagnosis, Pyoderma Gangrenosum diagnosis, Surgical Wound Infection diagnosis
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Fast and Standardized Skin Grafting of Leg Wounds With a New Technique: Report of 2 Cases and Review of Previous Methods.
- Author
-
Hamnerius N, Wallin E, Svensson Å, Stenström P, and Svensjö T
- Abstract
Background: Chronic leg ulcers remain a challenge to the treating physician. Such wounds often need skin grafts to heal. This necessitates a readily available, fast, simple, and standardized procedure for grafting., Objectives: The aim of this work was to test a novel method developed for outpatient transplant procedures., Methods: The procedure employs a handheld disposable dermatome and a roller mincer that cut the skin into standardized micrografts that can be spread out onto a suitable graft bed. Wounds were followed until healed and photographed., Results: The device was successfully used to treat and close a traumatic lower limb wound and a persistent chronic venous leg ulcer. The donor site itself healed by secondary intent with minimal cosmetic impairment., Conclusion: The method was successfully used to graft 2 lower extremity wounds.
- Published
- 2016
38. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by sterile non-latex protective gloves: clinical investigation and chemical analyses.
- Author
-
Pontén A, Hamnerius N, Bruze M, Hansson C, Persson C, Svedman C, Thörneby Andersson K, and Bergendorff O
- Subjects
- Adult, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Dermatitis, Occupational diagnosis, Dermatitis, Occupational etiology, Female, Hand Dermatoses diagnosis, Hand Dermatoses etiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Anti-Infective Agents, Local adverse effects, Cetylpyridinium adverse effects, Gloves, Surgical adverse effects, Guanidines adverse effects, Thiram adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: An increased frequency of occupational contact hand dermatitis among surgical operating theatre personnel has been noticed., Objectives: To evaluate patients with occupational contact dermatitis caused by their rubber gloves, and to describe a method for analysing the content of the allergens in the gloves., Materials and Methods: Patch tests were performed with the baseline series, a rubber chemical series, and the patients' own gloves. A method for analysing 1,3-diphenylguanidine (DPG) and cetylpyridinium chloride in the gloves was developed., Results: Contact allergy to thiuram mix was found in 8 of 16 patients, whereas 12 of 16 patients reacted to DPG. In 7 of 8 patients, contact allergy to cetylpyridinium chloride was found. In the patients' gloves, cetylpyridinium chloride and DPG were detected at higher concentrations on the inside of the gloves than on the outside. Most patients had worked for decades in their present occupations, but their hand dermatitis had only been present for months., Conclusion: Contact allergy to DPG in gloves has been disputed, but, in this study, we were able to confirm the presence of DPG and cetylpyridinium chloride in the causative gloves by using a modified method for the analysis. The presence of these chemicals in gloves caused an increase in occupational contact dermatitis in surgical operating theatre personnel., (© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Allergic contact dermatitis from dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate.
- Author
-
Frick M, Björkner B, Hamnerius N, and Zimerson E
- Subjects
- Adhesives chemistry, Adult, Air Pollutants, Occupational adverse effects, Allergens chemistry, Amines, Cyanates chemistry, Cyclohexylamines adverse effects, Female, Humans, Isocyanates adverse effects, Male, Molecular Structure, Patch Tests, Sweden, Adhesives adverse effects, Allergens adverse effects, Cyanates adverse effects, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Occupational Exposure adverse effects
- Abstract
From August 1999 to April 2001, there was an outbreak of severe eczema at a factory manufacturing medical equipment. A glue, mainly based on the isocyanate dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (DMDI), was suspected as being the cause of the problem. 16 workers with recent episodes of eczema were patch tested with a standard series, an isocyanate series and work material. The latter consisted of, among other things, the glue, DMDI, and an amine, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diamine (DMDA), which is formed when DMDI reacts with water. 13 patients reacted to DMDI, 9 to 1,6-hexamethylenediisocyanate (HDI) and 4 to isophoronediisocyanate (IPDI), all of which are aliphatic isocyanates. None reacted to the aromatic isocyanates, diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) or toluenediisocyanate (TDI). One explanation for this pattern could be that aromatic diisocyanates are more reactive than the aliphatic ones and that, therefore, they are inactivated before penetrating the skin. 5 patients reacted to DMDA and 5 to 4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane (MDA). Concurrent reactions to DMDA and or MDA with DMDI could be due to cross-reactivity. The positive reactions to MDA could also be a marker of MDI exposure. Yet another patient, investigated in 1997 with suspected work-related contact dermatitis from the glue, is described. She, however, showed no positive reactions to any isocyanates.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.