Search

The 1,287 genes targeted by the shRNA of the leukemia library.

Standard hematologic parameters in SIRT5-/- mice and SIRT5+/+ littermates.

Plasmids.

Patient sample information.

Antibodies.

We discovered that the survival and growth of many primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) samples and cell lines, but not normal CD34+ cells, are dependent on SIRT5, a lysine deacylase implicated in regulating multiple metabolic pathways. Dependence on SIRT5 is genotype agnostic and extends to RAS- and p53-mutated AML. Results were comparable between SIRT5 knockdown and SIRT5 inhibition using NRD167, a potent and selective SIRT5 inhibitor. Apoptosis induced by SIRT5 disruption is preceded by reductions in oxidative phosphorylation and glutamine utilization, and an increase in mitochondrial superoxide that is attenuated by ectopic superoxide dismutase 2. These data indicate that SIRT5 controls and coordinates several key metabolic pathways in AML and implicate SIRT5 as a vulnerability in AML.Significance:Reducing SIRT5 activity is detrimental to the survival of AML cells regardless of genotype, yet well tolerated by healthy hematopoietic cells. In mouse models, disrupting SIRT5 inhibits AML progression. SIRT5 controls several metabolic pathways that are required for leukemia cell survival. These results identify SIRT5 as a therapeutic target in AML.See related commentary by Li and Melnick, p. 198.

All supplemental figures and legends.

Next generation sequencing for 52 myeloid malignancies-related genes.

Oligonucleotide sequences.

Ranked list of 1,287 genes from shRNA library screen in primary AML cells. The 1,287 genes assessed with an shRNA library screen were sorted by the second highest percentile fold change present in 2 shRNA and across 2 samples, with the 34 genes showing a fold change in the top 2 percent in more than 2 samples listed first.

Supplementary Figure 4

Supplementary Methods, Legends

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 3

Supplementary Figure 2

Purpose:Myelofibrosis is a hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm characterized by bone marrow reticulin fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and frequent transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Constitutive activation of JAK/STAT signaling through mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL is central to myelofibrosis pathogenesis. JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib reduce symptoms and improve quality of life, but are not curative and do not prevent leukemic transformation, defining a need to identify better therapeutic targets in myelofibrosis.Experimental Design:A short hairpin RNA library screening was performed on JAK2V617F-mutant HEL cells. Nuclear–cytoplasmic transport (NCT) genes including RAN and RANBP2 were among top candidates. JAK2V617F-mutant cell lines, human primary myelofibrosis CD34+ cells, and a retroviral JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative neoplasms mouse model were used to determine the effects of inhibiting NCT with selective inhibitors of nuclear export compounds KPT-330 (selinexor) or KPT-8602 (eltanexor).Results:JAK2V617F-mutant HEL, SET-2, and HEL cells resistant to JAK inhibition are exquisitely sensitive to RAN knockdown or pharmacologic inhibition by KPT-330 or KPT-8602. Inhibition of NCT selectively decreased viable cells and colony formation by myelofibrosis compared with cord blood CD34+ cells and enhanced ruxolitinib-mediated growth inhibition and apoptosis, both in newly diagnosed and ruxolitinib-exposed myelofibrosis cells. Inhibition of NCT in myelofibrosis CD34+ cells led to nuclear accumulation of p53. KPT-330 in combination with ruxolitinib-normalized white blood cells, hematocrit, spleen size, and architecture, and selectively reduced JAK2V617F-mutant cells in vivo.Conclusions:Our data implicate NCT as a potential therapeutic target in myelofibrosis and provide a rationale for clinical evaluation in ruxolitinib-exposed patients with myelofibrosis.

Supplementary Figure 5

Supplementary Table 2

Supplementary Table 3-8

We discovered that the survival and growth of many primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) samples and cell lines, but not normal CD34+ cells, are dependent on SIRT5, a lysine deacylase implicated in regulating multiple metabolic pathways. Dependence on SIRT5 is genotype agnostic and extends to RAS- and p53-mutated AML. Results were comparable between SIRT5 knockdown and SIRT5 inhibition using NRD167, a potent and selective SIRT5 inhibitor. Apoptosis induced by SIRT5 disruption is preceded by reductions in oxidative phosphorylation and glutamine utilization, and an increase in mitochondrial superoxide that is attenuated by ectopic superoxide dismutase 2. These data indicate that SIRT5 controls and coordinates several key metabolic pathways in AML and implicate SIRT5 as a vulnerability in AML. Significance: Reducing SIRT5 activity is detrimental to the survival of AML cells regardless of genotype, yet well tolerated by healthy hematopoietic cells. In mouse models, disrupting SIRT5 inhibits AML progression. SIRT5 controls several metabolic pathways that are required for leukemia cell survival. These results identify SIRT5 as a therapeutic target in AML. See related commentary by Li and Melnick, p. 198.

Purpose: Myelofibrosis is a hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm characterized by bone marrow reticulin fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and frequent transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Constitutive activation of JAK/STAT signaling through mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL is central to myelofibrosis pathogenesis. JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib reduce symptoms and improve quality of life, but are not curative and do not prevent leukemic transformation, defining a need to identify better therapeutic targets in myelofibrosis. Experimental Design: A short hairpin RNA library screening was performed on JAK2V617F-mutant HEL cells. Nuclear–cytoplasmic transport (NCT) genes including RAN and RANBP2 were among top candidates. JAK2V617F-mutant cell lines, human primary myelofibrosis CD34+ cells, and a retroviral JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative neoplasms mouse model were used to determine the effects of inhibiting NCT with selective inhibitors of nuclear export compounds KPT-330 (selinexor) or KPT-8602 (eltanexor). Results: JAK2V617F-mutant HEL, SET-2, and HEL cells resistant to JAK inhibition are exquisitely sensitive to RAN knockdown or pharmacologic inhibition by KPT-330 or KPT-8602. Inhibition of NCT selectively decreased viable cells and colony formation by myelofibrosis compared with cord blood CD34+ cells and enhanced ruxolitinib-mediated growth inhibition and apoptosis, both in newly diagnosed and ruxolitinib-exposed myelofibrosis cells. Inhibition of NCT in myelofibrosis CD34+ cells led to nuclear accumulation of p53. KPT-330 in combination with ruxolitinib-normalized white blood cells, hematocrit, spleen size, and architecture, and selectively reduced JAK2V617F-mutant cells in vivo. Conclusions: Our data implicate NCT as a potential therapeutic target in myelofibrosis and provide a rationale for clinical evaluation in ruxolitinib-exposed patients with myelofibrosis.

Background Chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) is characterized by overproduction of differentiating myeloid cells, while blast phase CML (BP-CML) cells exhibit a differentiation block. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective in CP-CML, but resistance is common in BP-CML and can occur without explanatory BCR-ABL1 kinase mutations (BCR-ABL1-independent resistance). Similarly, CML stem/progenitor cells (LSPCs) are insensitive to TKIs, and residual leukemia persists in the majority of CML patients on TKI therapy. We previously reported overlap between the transcriptomes of CD34 + cells from BP-CML and TKI-naïve CP-CML patients with primary TKI resistance, pointing to commonalities between LSPC quiescence, BCR-ABL1-independent TKI resistance, and BP-CML. Results To identify common mechanisms, we performed a meta-analysis of published CML transcriptomes. We identified a small set of genes with consistently low expression in LSPC quiescence, BCR-ABL1-independent TKI resistance, and BP-CML, including Membrane Spanning 4-Domains A3 (MS4A3), a signaling protein previously reported to inhibit hematopoietic cell cycle progression. Low MS4A3 in CD34 + cells from TKI-naïve CP-CML patients was associated with shorter survival on subsequent TKI therapy, suggesting that MS4A3 governs TKI response. To understand the function of MS4A3, we lentivirally introduced MS4A3 shRNA or an MS4A3 expression vector into CML CD34 + LSPCs. MS4A3 knockdown increased clonogenicity and imatinib resistance, while ectopic MS4A3 expression had opposite effects. MS4A3 KD also increased LSPC persistence ex vivo in LTC-IC assays, and in vivo in NSG mice xenografts, while modulating MS4A3 expression had no effect on normal CD34 + cells. We next generated Ms4a3+/+│-/-; Scl-tTA+; TRE-BCR-ABL1+ compound transgenic mice. Upon BCR-ABL1 induction, Ms4a3-/-; Scl-tTA+; TRE-BCR-ABL1+ mice developed leukocytosis comparable to Ms4a3+/+ controls. However, BM of Ms4a3-/-; Scl-tTA+; TRE-BCR-ABL1+ mice showed increased short-term HSCs and multipotent progenitor cells, and reduced granulocyte-macrophage progenitors. When Lin - BM cells from leukemic mice were transplanted into irradiated recipients, Ms4a3-/-; Scl-tTA+; TRE-BCR-ABL1+ cells showed increased engraftment and myeloid leukocytosis, validating our observations in human cells. To determine how MS4A3 is downregulated in CML, we expressed BCR-ABL1in 32D-cl3 cells. p210 BCR-ABL1 drastically reduced Ms4a3 expression, while kinase-inactive p210 BCR-ABL1-K271R had no effect. Moreover, we found that suppression of C/EBPε by MECOM reduces MS4A3, consistent with previous reports of MECOM as a driver of TKI resistance and progression to BP. Treatment of CML CD34 + cells with a library of epigenetic pathway inhibitors revealed that MS4A3 is suppressed by both DNA methylation and PRC2/EZH2-mediated H3K27 trimethylation, which was confirmed by patch-PCR and ChIPseq. These data indicate that multi-levelled mechanisms cooperate in the suppression of MS4A3 in CML. To determine how MS4A3 regulates clonogenicity and TKI response, we expressed MS4A3-EGFP fusion protein in LAMA-84 CML cells. We found that MS4A3 resides on the plasma membrane and in endosomes. Surface protein biotin labelling and tandem mass spectrometry ± MS4A3 KD showed that MS4A3 controls endocytosis of membrane proteins, including common β chain (βc) cytokine receptors. Specifically, MS4A3 promotes endocytosis of βc cytokine receptors upon GM-CSF/IL-3 stimulation of primary LSPCs and enhances downstream signaling and differentiation, suggesting that restoring MS4A3 expression has therapeutic efficacy. To test this, we manufactured a prototype MS4A3 protein-loaded liposomal nanoparticle (NP) using coating with the CD34 CD62L for targeted delivery to CD34 + cells. Compared to MS4A3-free NPs, MS4A3 NPs increased CD34 +CD38 + and CD34 -CD38 + at the expense of CD34 +CD38 - cells, reduced clonogenicity, and increased sensitivity to TKIs, mimicking ectopic MS4A3 expression. Conclusion MS4A3 governs response to differentiating myeloid cytokines, providing a unifying mechanism for the differentiation block characteristic of primitive LSPCs and BP-CML cells. We posit that LSPCs downregulate MS4A3 to evade βc cytokine-induced differentiation to maintain a primitive, TKI-insensitive state. MS4A3 re-expression or delivery of ectopic MS4A3 may eliminate LSPCs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Druker: Aptose Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cepheid: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EnLiven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aileron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ALLCRON: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GRAIL: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Iterion Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties; Nemucore Medical Innovations, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Pfizer: Research Funding; Recludix Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Third Coast Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VB Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vincerx Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tyner: Agios: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Petra: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Schrodinger: Research Funding. Oehler: BMS: Consultancy; OncLive: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy. Radich: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deininger: Sangamo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Fusion Pharma, Medscape, DisperSol: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; SPARC, DisperSol, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding.

Standard of care for AML includes chemotherapy and stem cell transplant, with 5-year survival rates Citation Format: Dongqing Yan, Anca Franzini, Anthony D. Pomicter, Brayden J. Halverson, Orlando Antelope, Clinton C. Mason, Jonathan M. Ahmann, Anna V. Senina, Courtney L. L. Jones, Matthew S. Zabriskie, Hein Than, Michael J. Xiao, Alexandria van Scoyk, Ami B. Patel, William L. L. Heaton, Shawn C. Owen, Joshua L. Andersen, Christina M. Egbert, Julie A. Reisz, Angelo D'Alessandro, James E. Cox, Kevin C. Gantz, Hannah M. Redwine, Siddharth M. Iyer, Jamshid S. Khorashad, Nima Rajabi, Christian A. Olsen, Thomas O'Hare, Michael W. Deininger. A critical role for SIRT5 in acute myeloid leukemia metabolism [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB109.

Background: There is growing interest in the application of palliative care principles to improve care for patients and families affected by neurologic diseases. We developed an interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for patients and families affected by neurologic disorders to better address the problems faced by our highest need patients. We have developed and improved this program over the past three years and share several of our most important lessons as well as ongoing challenges and areas where we see our clinic evolving in the future. Methods: We provide a description of our clinic logistics, including key steps in the initiation of the clinic, and provide descriptions from similar clinics at other institutions to demonstrate some of the variability in this growing field. We also provide results from a formal one-year quality improvement project and a one-year retrospective study of patients attending this clinic. Results: Our clinic has grown steadily since its inception and maintains high satisfaction ratings from patients, caregivers, and referring providers. To maintain standardized and efficient care we have developed materials for patients and referring physicians as well as checklists and other processes used by our interdisciplinary team. Feedback from our quality improvement project helped define optimal visit duration and refine communication among team members and with patients and families. Results from our chart review suggest our clinic influences advance care planning and place of death. Common referral reasons include psychosocial support, complex symptom management, and advance care planning. Current challenges for our clinic include developing a strategy for continued growth, creating a sustainable financial model for interdisciplinary care, integrating our services with disease-specific sections, improving primary palliative care knowledge and skills within our referral base, and building effective alliances with community neurologists, geriatrics, primary care, nursing homes, and hospices. Conclusions: Specialized outpatient palliative care for neurologic disorders fills several important gaps in care for this patient population, provides important educational opportunities for trainees, and creates opportunities for patient and caregiver-centered research. Educational initiatives are needed to train general neurologists in primary palliative care, to train neurologists in specialist palliative care, and to train palliative medicine specialists in neurology. Research is needed to build an evidence base to identify patient and caregiver needs, support specific interventions, and to build more efficient models of care in both academic and community settings.

Summary Objective Examine therapeutic potential of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NERI) in an animal model of comorbidity between epilepsy, depression-like, and impulsive-like impairments. Methods Epilepsy was induced in male Wistar rats by LiCl and pilocarpine. An SSRI fluoxetine (FLX), and an NERI reboxetine (RBX) were administered either alone or as a combination over 1 week. Depressive-like and impulsive-like behaviors were examined using the forced swim test. Fast scan cyclic voltammetry was used to analyze serotonergic transmission in the raphe nucleus (RN)–prefrontal cortex (PFC) pathway, and noradrenergic transmission in locus coeruleus (LC)-PFC, and LC-RN projections. Monoamine levels in PFC were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Functional capacities of 5-HT1A receptors and α2A adrenoreceptors in PFC were analyzed by autoradiography. Results Epileptic rats showed behavioral signs of depression and hyperimpulsivity, suppressed serotonergic and noradrenergic tones, decreased levels of serotonin (5-HT), and norepinephrine (NE); 5-HT1A receptor and α2A adrenoreceptors functions remained intact. FLX failed to improve behavioral deficits, but effectively raised 5-HT level and marginally improved RN-PFC serotonergic transmission. RBX reversed impulsive-like behavior, normalized content of NE and noradrenergic tone in LC-PFC and LC-RN. FLX-RBX combination fully reversed depressive-like behavior, and normalized RN-PFC serotonergic transmission. None of the treatment modified the function of 5-HT and NE receptors. Significance Depressive- and impulsive-like behaviors in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy stem respectively from dysfunctions of serotonergic and noradrenergic ascending pathways. At the same time, epilepsy-associated depression is SSRI resistant. The finding that an SSRI-NERI combination exerts antidepressant effect, along with RBX-induced improvement of LC-RN noradrenergic transmission point toward the involvement of LC-RN noradrenergic input in enabling therapeutic potential of FLX. Medications that improve serotonergic and noradrenergic transmission, such as serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors may be effective in treating epilepsy-associated SSRI-resistant depression, as well as concurrent depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The mechanisms underlying tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients lacking explanatory BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations are incompletely understood. To identify mechanisms of TKI resistance that are independent of BCR-ABL1 kinase activity, we introduced a lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA) library targeting ∼5000 cell signaling genes into K562(R), a CML cell line with BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent TKI resistance expressing exclusively native BCR-ABL1. A customized algorithm identified genes whose shRNA-mediated knockdown markedly impaired growth of K562(R) cells compared with TKI-sensitive controls. Among the top candidates were 2 components of the nucleocytoplasmic transport complex, RAN and XPO1 (CRM1). shRNA-mediated RAN inhibition or treatment of cells with the XPO1 inhibitor, KPT-330 (Selinexor), increased the imatinib sensitivity of CML cell lines with kinase-independent TKI resistance. Inhibition of either RAN or XPO1 impaired colony formation of CD34(+) cells from newly diagnosed and TKI-resistant CML patients in the presence of imatinib, without effects on CD34(+) cells from normal cord blood or from a patient harboring the BCR-ABL1(T315I) mutant. These data implicate RAN in BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent imatinib resistance and show that shRNA library screens are useful to identify alternative pathways critical to drug resistance in CML.

Large numbers of women undergo antidepressant treatment during pregnancy; however, long-term consequences for their offspring remain largely unknown. Rodents exposed to serotonin transporter (SERT)-inhibiting antidepressants during development show changes in adult emotion-like behavior. These changes have been equated with behavioral alterations arising from genetic reductions in SERT. Both models are highly relevant to humans yet they vary in their time frames of SERT disruption. We find that anxiety-related behavior and, importantly, underlying serotonin neurotransmission diverge between the two models. In mice, constitutive loss of SERT causes life-long increases in anxiety-related behavior and hyperserotonemia. Conversely, early exposure to the antidepressant escitalopram (ESC; Lexapro) results in decreased anxiety-related behavior beginning in adolescence, which is associated with adult serotonin system hypofunction in the ventral hippocampus. Adult behavioral changes resulting from early fluoxetine (Prozac) exposure were different from those of ESC and, although somewhat similar to SERT deficiency, were not associated with changes in hippocampal serotonin transmission in late adulthood. These findings reveal dissimilarities in adult behavior and neurotransmission arising from developmental exposure to different widely prescribed antidepressants that are not recapitulated by genetic SERT insufficiency. Moreover, they support a pivotal role for serotonergic modulation of anxiety-related behavior.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm characterized by constitutive activation of JAK/STAT signaling due to mutations in JAK2, calreticulin or MPL. Many MF patients suffer from severe constitutional symptoms and have reduced life expectancy due to cytopenias, progression to acute myeloid leukemia and thromboembolic events. JAK kinase inhibitors such as ruxolitinib (RUX) reduce MF symptoms, but like all other drugs used in MF, are not curative, with persistence of mutant cells and prompt symptom rebound upon discontinuation. This defines a clinical need to identify strategies capable of inducing more profound and durable responses in MF. To identify previously unrecognized molecular vulnerabilities in MF, we infected HEL cells (homozygous for JAK2V617F) with a barcoded lentiviral shRNA library targeting ~5,000 human signal transduction genes, with 5-6 shRNAs/gene (Cellecta Human Module 1). Conditions were optimized to achieve a multitude of infection (MOI) of ~1. Barcode abundance was compared between days 0 and 9 after infection by next generation sequencing. Candidates were selected based on ≥ 15-fold reduction of abundance by ≥ 2 shRNAs targeting the same gene, similar to Khorashad et al. [Blood. 2015;125(11):1772-81]. Amongst the genes meeting these criteria, nuclear cytoplasmic transport (NCT) was significantly enriched, with RAN and RANBP2 amongst the top genes, suggesting that HEL cells may be highly dependent on NCT. For confirmation, HEL cells were stably transduced with doxycycline (DOX)-inducible shRAN. After 72 hours DOX-induced knockdown of RAN reduced viable cells by 77.3±5.5% and colony formation by 82.8±1.3% and dramatically increased apoptosis (uninduced: ~10% vs. induced: ~50%). Similar results were observed in SET-2 cells (heterozygous for JAK2V617F). We next cultured HEL and SET-2 cells with graded concentrations of the KPT-330 (selinexor, Karyopharm), an inhibitor of CRM-1, the core component of NCT, or RUX as a comparison. Selinexor was five-fold more potent than RUX against HEL cells (IC50: 98nM for KPT vs. 536 nM for RUX) and as potent as RUX in SET-2 cells (IC50:~100 nM). Importantly, RUX-resistant HEL cells (IC50:24µM) were highly sensitive to inhibition of NCT by knockdown of RAN or selinexor (IC50:160nM). Selinexor also selectively inhibited colony formation by primary MF vs. cord blood (CB) CD34+ cells (IC50:93nM for MF vs. 203nM for CB). Lastly, selinexor enhanced RUX-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in primary MF CD34+cells cultured ex vivo for 72h (including both JAK2 mutation positive and negative MF samples, n=3 for each, and RUX resistant patient samples, n=6). Nuclear:cytoplasmic fractionation of HEL cells revealed that the expression and nuclear localization of the tumor suppressors FoxO3A and APC, but not of PP2A and nucleophosmin (NPM) were significantly increased upon knockdown of RAN, which may contribute to the increased apoptosis following NCT inhibition. To determine the in vivo effects of selinexor in MF, we induced MPN in Balb/c mice by transplanting donor marrow infected with JAK2V617F for three weeks, and then treated mice (n=13/group) with vehicle, selinexor (initial dose 20 mg/kg, 3x weekly, orally) or RUX (initial dose 50 mg/kg twice daily, orally) or the combination of RUX plus selinexor for up to 4 weeks. Combination treatment significantly reduced white blood cell counts and normalized spleen size. Compared to vehicle, selinexor alone significantly reduced GFP+cells in the spleen, and this effect was further enhanced with the combination treatment. Histopathology revealed that combination treatment restored splenic architecture, while bone marrow fibrosis was not significantly altered by selinexor or the combination. Mice in all groups, including the combined vehicle controls, experienced considerable weight loss, suggesting that toxicity may be partially due to high dose and frequent drug administration. Experiments with the next generation NCT inhibitor KPT-8602 [Etchin et al., Leukemia, 2016 Jun 24] are underway. In summary, our results suggest that MF cells are exquisitely dependent on NCT, and that NCT inhibition alone or in combination with RUX may reduce JAK2V617F allelic burden. This identifies NCT as a prime therapeutic target in MF. A phase I clinical trial of selinexor in refractory MF is in preparation. Disclosures Baloglu: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: We have previously demonstrated that the transcriptional profile of diagnostic CD34+ cells from chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients exhibiting primary cytogenetic resistance to imatinib overlaps with that of patients with myeloid blast phase CML (BP-CML) (McWeeney et al. Blood 2010). These data suggest that primary resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and advanced disease are biologically related. The hematopoietic cell cycle regulator, MS4A3, was identified as a principal component of the gene expression classifier predicting response to imatinib. Low MS4A3 correlated not only with primary TKI resistance, but also with shorter overall survival in CP-CML (n=35). Consistently, microarray (n=19 CP-CML; n=16 BP-CML), qRT-PCR (n=22 CP-CML; n=17 BP-CML), and immunoblot (n=3 CP-CML; n=3 BP-CML) analyses demonstrated that MS4A3 mRNA and protein levels are reduced in CD34+ progenitor cells from BP-CML versus CP-CML patients, with no difference between CP-CML and normal CD34+progenitors (n=3) (Eiring et al. ASH 2015 #14). These data suggest that MS4A3 may play a role in both primary TKI resistance and blastic transformation of CML. Results: To assess the functional role of MS4A3 in CML and TKI response, we used ectopic MS4A3 expression and shRNA-mediated MS4A3 knockdown in CD34+ cells from BP-CML and CP-CML patients, respectively. Ectopic expression of MS4A3 in BP-CML CD34+ progenitors (n=5) markedly reduced colony formation in the presence and absence of imatinib, consistent with a tumor suppressor role for MS4A3 in CML. While re-expression of MS4A3 alone did not increase apoptosis compared to empty vector-expressing controls, imatinib-induced apoptosis in BP-CML CD34+ cells was increased by 62%, with no effect on normal CD34+ cord blood cells (n=2). Conversely, shRNA-mediated MS4A3 knockdown (shMS4A3) in CP-CML CD34+ cells (n=7) reduced the effects of imatinib in colony formation and apoptosis assays, with no effect on normal CD34+ progenitors (n=4). In contrast to a previous report (Donato JL, et al. J Clin Invest 2002), we detected no change in cell cycle status of CML or normal CD34+ cells upon MS4A3 ectopic expression or knockdown (n=3). Altogether, these data suggest that MS4A3 positively regulates patient survival and imatinib response in CML progenitor cells. To evaluate MS4A3 in the leukemic stem cell compartment, we performed qRT-PCR on primary CP-CML cells (n=5) and observed that MS4A3 mRNA levels are 22-fold higher in committed CD34+38+ progenitors compared to more primitive CD34+38- stem cells, suggesting a role for MS4A3 in differentiation. Consistently, qRT-PCR, immunoblot, and flow cytometry demonstrated that MS4A3 mRNA and protein were upregulated in CP-CML CD34+ cells upon G-CSF treatment (n=3). Flow cytometry also revealed that shMS4A3 in CP-CML CD34+ cells resulted in a reduction of CD11b+ cells by ~45% in the presence of G-CSF (n=3). To assess the function of MS4A3 in CML stem cells, we performed long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assays and xenografts into NSG mice upon MS4A3 knockdown in CP-CML (n=3). shMS4A3 increased Ph+ LTC-IC colony formation in the absence, and even more so in the presence, of imatinib, with no effects on Ph- LTC-ICs. Consistent with these data, shMS4A3 enhanced engraftment of CD34+CD45+GFP+ cells into the bone marrow of NSG recipient mice. Preliminary data in primary TKI-resistant and BP-CML CD34+ cells suggests regulation of this gene by promoter hypermethylation. Conclusions: Altogether, these data suggest that MS4A3 plays a key role in imatinib response of 1) patients with primary TKI resistance, 2) patients with BP-CML, and 3) the CML stem cell compartment. Since the effects of MS4A3 in CML do not involve changes to the cell cycle, experiments are underway to identify the mechanism by which MS4A3 improves imatinib response and survival in CML. Disclosures Druker: Agios: Honoraria; Ambit BioSciences: Consultancy; ARIAD: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Array: Patents & Royalties; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses ; BMS: Research Funding; CTI: Equity Ownership; Curis: Patents & Royalties; Cylene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; D3 Oncology Solutions: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses ; Lorus: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; MolecularMD: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncotide Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Patents & Royalties; Roche: Consultancy. Deininger:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction. Development of abnormal Philadelphia (Ph) negative clones following treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with imatinib has been observed in 3 to 9% of patients. Here we report on a 77 year old male diagnosed with CML that responded to imatinib treatment and subsequently developed chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). He achieved major cytogenetic response within 3 months but this response coincided with the emergence of monocytosis diagnosed as CMML. Five months after starting imatinib treatment the patient succumbed to CMML. We analyzed five sequential samples to determine whether a chronological order of mutations defined the emergence of CMML and to characterize the clonal evolution of the CMML population. Materials and Method. Five samples (diagnostic and four follow up samples) were available for analysis. CMML mutations were identified by whole exome sequencing (WES) in CD14+ cells following the onset of CMML, using CD3+ cells as constitutional control. Mutations were validated by Sequenom MassARRAY and Sanger sequencing and quantified by pyrosequencing. Deep WES was performed on the diagnostic sample to determine whether the mutations were present at CML diagnosis. To determine the clonal architecture of the emerging CMML, colony formation assays were performed on the diagnostic and the next two follow-up samples (Samples 1-3). More than 100 colonies per sample were plucked for DNA and RNA isolation. The DNA from these colonies were tested for the presence of the confirmed CMML mutations and the RNA was used for detection of BCR-ABL1 transcript using a Taqman real time assay. Results. Four mutations were identified by Sequenom and WES throughout the patient's time course [KRASG12R, MSLNP462H, NTRK3V443I and EZH2I669M ]. Sequenom did not identify these at diagnosis while deep WES did. Clones derived from colony formation assay revealed three distinct clones present in all samples analysed. Clone 1 had only KRASG12R, clone 2 had KRASG12R, MSLNP462H, and NTRK3V443I, and clone 3 had all four mutations. All clones containing any of these four mutations were BCR/ABL1 negative. Analysis of clonal architecture indicated that KRASG12R was acquired first and EZH2I669M last, while MSLNP462H and NTRK3V443I were acquired in between. These CMML clones increased proportionately as clinical CML metamorphosed into clinical CMML after initiation of imatinib therapy. Consistent with the colony data, pyrosequencing revealed that the ratio between the mutants remained largely stable throughout the follow up period. Conclusion. This case illustrates how targeted therapy impacts clonal competition in a heterogeneous MPN. While the CML clone was dominant in the absence of imatinib, it was quickly outcompeted by the CMML clones upon initiation of imatinib therapy. The clonal architecture analysis, in combination with in vivo kinetics data, suggest that the KRASG12R mutation alone was able to produce a CMML phenotype as clones with just KRASG12R remained at a relatively stable ratio during follow up. Unexpectedly, acquisition of additional mutations, including EZH2I669M as the last mutational event identified in this patient, did not increase clonal competitiveness, at least in the peripheral blood. These data show that clonal evolution may not invariably increase clonal fitness, suggesting that factors other than Darwinian pressures contribute to clonal diversity in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Disclosures Deininger: Gilead: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Mutations in the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain are a well-documented mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but less is known about primary resistance independent of BCR-ABL1 kinase activity. We reported a gene expression classifier of TKI-naïve CD34+ cells from chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients that predicts cytogenetic response to imatinib (McWeeney et al. Blood 2010). The expression signature associated with primary cytogenetic failure showed overlap with previously reported signatures of blast phase CML (BP-CML), suggesting that primary TKI resistance and advanced disease are biologically similar. Results: To identify critical genes involved in primary TKI resistance, we performed principal component analysis on the expression signature and identified the hematopoietic cell cycle regulator, MS4A3, as a key factor within this classifier. Importantly, low MS4A3 expression not only correlated with primary TKI resistance, but also with shorter overall survival (p92%) in CD34+ cells from BP-CML patients (n=17; p MS4A3 expression is also low in BP-CML cell lines, including K562, KYO-1, BV-173, KCL-22, and KU-812, with the notable exception of LAMA-84 cells. Thus, to understand the functional role of MS4A3 for TKI resistance, we introduced a doxycycline-inducible shRNA targeting MS4A3 (shMS4A3) into LAMA-84 cells. qRT-PCR confirmed 50-90% MS4A3 knockdown in the presence of doxycycline (0.1 µg/mL). Consistent with its role as a tumor suppressor, MTS assays revealed that MS4A3 knockdown increased the imatinib IC50 (n=3; p2-fold upregulation of MS4A3. As expected, ectopic MS4A3 reduced colony formation by 55% in AP-CML (n=2; p Conclusion: Our results suggest that MS4A3 is a tumor suppressor protein in CML that governs TKI responsiveness and is regulated in a BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent manner. MS4A3 loss confers TKI resistance to CP-CML patients destined to exhibit primary cytogenetic failure, and in BP-CML patients with refractory resistance. MS4A3 may also contribute to the innate resistance of primitive CML stem cells. Studies to identify the mechanism of MS4A3 downregulation in TKI resistance and how its loss biochemically impairs TKI response is currently underway and will be reported. Disclosures Agarwal: CTI BioPharma: Research Funding. Deininger:BMS: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceutical Inc.: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Incyte: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role.

Background: The treatment and survival of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has greatly improved after the discovery of imatinib; however, disease persistence and drug resistance remain as clinical problems. McWeeney et al. (Blood 2010;115:315-325) identified a gene expression signature predictive of primary cytogenetic resistance to imatinib in treatment-naïve CML chronic phase (CML-CP) patients lacking BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations. Comparison of this gene classifier with other studies revealed extensive overlap of resistance genes with genes associated with CML blastic transformation, suggesting that CML-CP patients destined to fail imatinib may exhibit a gene profile reminiscent of advanced CML. Based on rank predictive score from the microarray, the top transcripts found to be dysregulated in newly diagnosed patients who subsequently emerged as imatinib non-responders were: PLCXD2, EGF16, GAS2, RXFP1, ITGA2, MS4A3, FCN1, EMCN, EMCN, CLIP4, ZNF44 and G0S2. Among these, MS4A3 and G0S2 were differentially downregulated in non-responders compared to responders. Conversely, high levels of MS4A3 (p=0.059) and G0S2 (p=0.036) correlated with higher likelihood of major cytogenetic response and longer overall survival. MS4A3 (HTM4) is a hematopoietic cell cycle regulator that inhibits G1/S phase cell cycle transition, whereas G0S2 is proapoptotic mitochondrial protein that interacts with and antagonizes BCL-2. In this study, we investigated the potential role of MS4A3 and G0S2 as tumor suppressors in CML and their influence on TKI resistance and blastic transformation. MS4A3 and CML: Expression of p210BCR-ABL1 in 32Dcl3 or Mo7e myeloid progenitor cells resulted in an 80% reduction of MS4A3 mRNA relative to parental cells by qRT-PCR analysis. Imatinib treatment slightly restored MS4A3 levels in 32D-p210 or Mo7e-p210 cells, but did not return levels to those of normal controls growing with cytokine support. Consistent with a role for MS4A3 in CML blastic transformation, qRT-PCR revealed low levels of MS4A3 in cell line models of blastic phase CML (CML-BP), including K562, KYO-1, and KBM, that were unaffected by treatment with imatinib. Furthermore, qRT-PCR confirmed that MS4A3 is downregulated (~20-fold) in CML CD34+ progenitor cells from CML-BP (n=3) compared to CML-CP (n=5) patients and normal controls (n=3), and that these levels were unaffected by imatinib. We then used tetracycline-inducible shRNA directed against MS4A3 (shMS4A3) to knockdown MS4A3 in primary CML CD34+ cells from newly diagnosed CML-CP patients subsequently responding to TKIs. Western blot and qRT-PCR analyses confirmed MS4A3 downregulation upon exposure to doxycyline (0.1 ug/mL). shMS4A3 upregulated colony formation by 37.6% (p G0S2 and CML: Consistent with a role for G0S2 in CML blastic transformation, qRT-PCR revealed that G0S2 mRNA is highly downregulated (~24-fold) in CML CD34+ progenitor cells from CML-BP (n=3) compared to CML-CP (n=5) patients and normal controls (n=3). G0S2 is also downregulated in TKI-resistant K562R and AR230R cells compared to parental TKI-sensitive counterparts. K562R and AR230R cells are resistant to all clinically approved TKIs, but lack BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations, implicating BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent TKI resistance. Ectopic expression of a Flag-tagged G0S2 (G0S2-Flag) significantly reduced colony formation in both parental K562 and AR230 cells, but had an even greater effect in TKI-resistant K562R and AR230R cells in the presence of imatinib. G0S2-Flag also impaired colony formation of CML-CP CD34+cells in both the presence (p Conclusions:These findings suggest a role for loss of MS4A3 or G0S2 tumor suppressor function in both TKI resistance in the absence of explanatory BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations and in CML blastic transformation. Studies to test the effects of restored MS4A3 or G0S2 expression in CML-BP and TKI-resistant patient samples are currently underway. Disclosures Deininger: BMS, Novartis, Celgene, Genzyme, Gilead: Research Funding; BMA, ARIAD, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; BMS, ARIAD, Novartis, Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy.