Search

GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) has gained widespread adoption as an option to traditional transurethral resection of the prostate. Prior reports expressed concern with the use of PVP in large prostates. The aim of this study was to investigate the adjusted outcomes of GreenLight PVP in men with large (≥ 80 cc) vs. small prostates ( 80 cc).Data were obtained from the Global Greenlight Group which pools data from 7 high volume centers. Men with established benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent GreenLight PVP using the XPS-180 W system between 2011 and 2019 were eligible and assigned into two groups based on their prostate size (≥ 80 and 80 cc). 11 functional and perioperative covariates were collected. Analyses were adjusted for patient age and presence of median lobe.3426 men met the inclusion criteria. 34.6% (n = 1187) of patients had a large prostate size. Baseline age and prostate volume were significantly different between the groups. The magnitude of absolute improvement in unadjusted international prostate symptom score was significantly greater in the large (≥ 80 cc) prostate group at 12 months, with an absolute change of 19.17 points (95% CI 18.46-19.88; p 0.01). There was also a significant drop in PVR at both 6- (p = 0.007) and 12 months (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in transfusion (p = 0.42), hematuria (p = 0.80), or 30-day readmission rates (p = 0.28).Greenlight PVP is a safe and effective alternative for patients with prostate sizes ≥ 80 cc, with durable outcomes relatively independent from prostate size.

To analyze possible differences in the inter-reader variability between PI-RADS version 2 (v2) and version 2.1 (v2.1) for the classification of prostate lesions using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate.In this retrospective and randomized study, 239 annotated and histopathologically correlated prostate lesions (104 positive and 135 negative for prostate cancer) were rated twice by three experienced uroradiologists using PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 with an interval of at least two months between readings. Results were tabulated across readers and reading timepoints and inter-reader variability was determined using Fleiss' kappa (κ). Thereafter, an additional analysis of the data was performed in which PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 were combined, as they have the same clinical consequences.PI-PI-RADS v2.1 showed better inter-reader agreement in the peripheral zone (PZ), but poorer inter-reader agreement in the transition zone (TZ) (PZ: κ = 0.63 vs. κ = 0.58; TZ: κ = 0.47 vs. κ = 0.57). When PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 were combined, the use of PI-RADS v2.1 resulted in almost perfect inter-reader agreement in the PZ and substantial agreement in the TZ (PZ: κ = 0.81; TZ: κ = 0.80).PI-RADS v2.1 improves inter-reader agreement in the PZ. New differences in inter-reader agreement were mainly the result of the assignment of PI-RADS v2.1 scores 1 and 2 to lesions in the TZ. Combining scores 1 and 2 improved inter-reader agreement both in the TZ and in the PZ, indicating that refined definitions may be warranted for these PI-RADS scores.· PI-RADSv2.1 improves inter-reader agreement in the PZ but not in the TZ.. · New differences derived from PI-RADSv2.1 scores 1 and 2 in the TZ.. · Combined PI-RADSv2.1 scores of 1 and 2 yielded better inter-reader agreement.. · PI-RADSv2.1 appears to provide more precise description of lesions in the PZ.. · Improved inter-reader agreement in the PZ stresses the importance of appropriate lexicon description..· Beetz N, Haas M, Baur A et al. Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 852 - 861.ZIEL: Analyse der möglichen Differenzen in der Interrater-Reliabilität zwischen PI-RADS Version 2 (v2) und Version 2.1 (v2.1) für die Klassifizierung von Prostata-Läsionen in der multiparametrischen MRT (mpMRT) der Prostata.In dieser retrospektiven und randomisierten Studie wurden 239 bereits annotierte und histopathologisch korrelierte Läsionen der Prostata (104 positiv und 135 negativ für Prostatakrebs) zweimal von radiologisch-fachärztlichen Experten für uroradiologische Bildgebung bewertet: zuerst nach PI-RADS v2 und nach einem zeitlichen Intervall von mindestens 2 Monaten anhand der aktualisierten Version PI-RADS v2.1. Die Ergebnisse der Bewerter und Bewertungszeitpunkte wurden kreuztabelliert und die Interrater-Reliabilität wurde mittels Fleiss’ kappa (κ) berechnet. In einer weiteren Analyse wurden die beiden Wertungen mit derselben klinischen Konsequenz PI-RADS-Score 1 und 2 kombiniert und deren Interrater-Reliabilität erneut getestet.PI-RADS v2.1 zeigte eine bessere Interrater-Reliabilität in der peripheren Zone (PZ), aber eine schlechtere Interrater-Reliabilität in der Transitionszone (TZ) (PZ: κ = 0,63 vs. κ = 0,58; TZ: κ = 0,47 vs. κ = 0,57). Die Kombination der PI-RADS-Bewertungen 1 und 2 bei PI-RADS v2.1 resultierte in einer nahezu perfekten Interrater-Reliabilität in der PZ und in einer substantiellen Interrater-Reliabilität in der TZ (PZ: κ = 0,81; TZ: κ = 0,80).PI-RADS v2.1 verbessert die Interrater-Reliabilität in der PZ. Neue Differenzen in der Interrater-Reliabilität bei PI-RADS v2.1 entsprangen hauptsächlich den Läsionen in der TZ, die mit einem Score von 1 oder 2 bewertet wurden. Durch die Kombination der klinisch gleichwertigen PI-RADS-Bewertungen 1 und 2 wird die Interrater-Reliabilität sowohl in der TZ als auch PZ verbessert, sodass eine verbesserte Definition für diese Bewertungen angebracht sein könnte.· PI-RADS v2.1 verbessert Interrater-Reliabilität in der PZ, aber nicht in der TZ.. · Neue Unterschiede entspringen den PI-RADS v2.1-Bewertungen 1 und 2 in der TZ.. · Die Kombination der PI-RADS v2.1-Bewertungen 1 und 2 verbessert die Interrater-Reliabilität.. · PI-RADS v2.1 ermöglicht offenbar eine präzisere Deskription von Läsionen in der PZ.. · Verbesserung der Interrater-Reliabilität in der PZ betont die Bedeutung von geeigneten Deskriptoren..

Primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO) is a dysfunction of the bladder neck (BN) in which the collum vesicae is narrow or fails to open adequately during voiding, resulting in a bladder outlet obstruction. PBNO causes storage or voiding LUTS often years before a correct diagnosis of PBNO is made. These patients have often been seen by many physicians and misdiagnosed as having psychogenic voiding dysfunction because of a normal prostate on rectal examination, a negligible residual urine volume, and a normal endoscopic bladder and prostate appearance. The cause of PBNO has not yet been clarified and has so far been a clinical differential diagnosis after the exclusion of the usual differential diagnoses of LUTS and bladder emptying disorders. Several publications let assume that PBNO could be induced by inflammatory processes, possibly by the same inflammatory patterns that have been previously described for BPH development, leading to an initially reversiblel and later irreversible remodeling of the connective tissue of the BN. The clinical value of these observations consists of a correct and precise diagnostic framework especially in young men referring pelvic pain and LUTS despite their small prostate volumes. The proper diagnosis could provide a tempestive calculated therapy proposal that can stop illness progression or in same cases reverse inflammation and collagenic deposition, limiting the risk of future obstruction and symtomatic progression.

Background Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is recommended for primary risk stratification and follow-up in Active Surveillance (AS), it is not part of common AS inclusion criteria. The objective was to compare AS eligibility by systematic biopsy (SB) and combined MRI-targeted (MRI-TB) and SB within real-world data using current AS guidelines. Methods A retrospective multicenter study was conducted by a German prostate cancer (PCa) working group representing six tertiary referral centers and one outpatient practice. Men with PCa and at least one MRI-visible lesion according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 were included. Twenty different AS inclusion criteria of international guidelines were applied to calculate AS eligibility using either a SB or a combined MRI-TB and SB. Reasons for AS exclusion were assessed. Results Of 1941 patients with PCa, per guideline, 583–1112 patients with PCa in both MRI-TB and SB were available for analysis. Using SB, a median of 22.1% (range 6.4–72.4%) were eligible for AS. Using the combined approach, a median of 15% (range 1.7–68.3%) were eligible for AS. Addition of MRI-TB led to a 32.1% reduction of suitable patients. Besides Gleason Score upgrading, the maximum number of positive cores were the most frequent exclusion criterion. Variability in MRI and biopsy protocols potentially limit the results. Conclusions Only a moderate number of patients with PCa can be monitored by AS to defer active treatment using current guidelines for inclusion in a real-world setting. By an additional MRI-TB, this number is markedly reduced. These results underline the need for a contemporary adjustment of AS inclusion criteria.

Greenlight photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (GL-PVP) has gained international acceptance as a safe and effective alternative procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), especially in anticoagulated men. This descriptive analysis aims to characterize the current state of GL-PVP, pooling data from international centers. Data from 3627 patients who underwent GL-PVP with the XPS-180 W system in seven international centers performed by eight expert surgeons between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected, including IPSS, QoL, Qmax, PVR, and PSA, and complications. At baseline, median age, prostate volume, PSA, and IPSS were 70 years (interquartile range 64–77), 64 (47–90), 3.1 ng/mL (1.8–6), and 22 (19–27), respectively. Median lasing and operative time were 34 (23–48) and 62 min (46–85), respectively. Median energy use was 250.0 kJ (168.4–367.9), with 92.6% of procedures being completed with one laser fiber. In 60.1% of cases, catheter was removed on postoperative day 1 with median length of 2 days. All-cause mortality within 30 days was 0.3%. Median PSA reduction at 3 months and 60 months compared to baseline was 43.9 and 46.4%, respectively (p

Purpose: Focal therapy (FT) became a frequently discussed treatment strategy of localized prostate cancer (PCa), but the acceptance and evaluation of FT by practicing urologists are still unclear. ...

Purpose Due to the tissue preserving approach of focal therapy (FT), local cancer relapse can occur. Uncertainty exists regarding triggers and outcome of salvage strategies. Methods Patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) after FT for localized PCa from 2011 to 2020 at eight tertiary referral hospitals in Germany that underwent salvage radical prostatectomy (S-RP), salvage radiotherapy (S-RT) or active surveillance (AS) were reported. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) changes, suspicious lesions on mpMRI and histopathological findings on biopsy were analyzed. A multivariable regression model was created for adverse pathological findings (APF) at S-RP specimen. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to determine oncological outcomes. Results A total of 90 men were included. Cancer relapse after FT was detected at a median of 12 months (IQR 9–16). Of 50 men initially under AS 13 received S-RP or S-RT. In total, 44 men underwent S-RP and 13 S-RT. At cancer relapse 17 men (38.6%) in the S-RP group [S-RT n = 4 (30.8%); AS n = 3 (6%)] had ISUP > 2. APF (pT ≥ 3, ISUP ≥ 3, pN + or R1) were observed in 23 men (52.3%). A higher ISUP on biopsy was associated with APF [p = 0.006 (HR 2.32, 97.5% CI 1.35–4.59)] on univariable analysis. Progression-free survival was 80.4% after S-RP and 100% after S-RT at 3 years. Secondary therapy-free survival was 41.7% at 3 years in men undergoing AS. Metastasis-free survival was 80% at 5 years for the whole cohort. Conclusion With early detection of cancer relapse after FT S-RP and S-RT provide sufficient oncologic control at short to intermediate follow-up. After AS, a high secondary-therapy rate was observed.

To evaluate the additional value of systematic biopsies (SB) when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsies (MRI/TRUS TPBx) with needle tracking.From January 2019 to March 2021 969 Patients after a MRI/TRUS TPBx were evaluated separately for target biopsies (TB) and systematic biopsies regarding PCa detection and PCa risk evaluation. Needle tracking in the axial sequences of multiparametric MRI was used to assess the localisation of the detected PCa in the biopsy cores related to the reported PI-RADS lesions.The overall cancer detection rate (CDR) for PCa and clinically significant (cs) PCa (ISUP ≥2) with the combination of TB and SB were 66 and 49%. TB detected 46% csPCa and SB 22% csPCa. SB identified 1.5% additional csPCa outside of the reported PI-RADS lesions. 16 patients (1.7%) showed a relevant upgrading from clinically insignificant PCa in TB to csPCa. In 736 patients with unilateral suspicious lesions on MRI, 145 patients (20%) were detected with contralateral PCa-positive SB. 238 patients (25%) showed PCa positive systematic biopsy cores outside of the described PI-RADS lesions.Needle tracking optimizes the 3D-localisation of cancer in the prostate. Our results show that the added value of SB with a reduced systematic biopsy scheme is low with regard to prostate cancer (PCa) detection and PCa risk evaluation. However, there is a relevant added value for localizing multifocal PCa in the primary diagnostic by a MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate.

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to detect the prostate index lesion before targeted biopsy. However, the number of biopsy cores that should be obtained from the index lesion is unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze how many MRI-targeted biopsy cores are needed to establish the most relevant histopathologic diagnosis of the index lesion and to build a prediction model. Methods We retrospectively included 451 patients who underwent 10-core systematic prostate biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy with sampling of at least three cores from the index lesion. A total of 1587 biopsy cores were analyzed. The core sampling sequence was recorded, and the first biopsy core detecting the most relevant histopathologic diagnosis was identified. In a subgroup of 261 patients in whom exactly three MRI-targeted biopsy cores were obtained from the index lesion, we generated a prediction model. A nonparametric Bayes classifier was trained using the PI-RADS score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, lesion size, zone, and location as covariates. Results The most relevant histopathologic diagnosis of the index lesion was detected by the first biopsy core in 331 cases (73%), by the second in 66 cases (15%), and by the third in 39 cases (9%), by the fourth in 13 cases (3%), and by the fifth in two cases ( Conclusion The most relevant histopathologic diagnosis of the index lesion was made on the basis of three MRI-targeted biopsy cores in 97% of patients. Our classifier can help in predicting the first MRI-targeted biopsy core revealing the most relevant histopathologic diagnosis; however, at least three MRI-targeted biopsy cores should be obtained regardless of the preinterventionally assessed covariates.

Objectives To assess the discriminatory power of lexicon terms used in PI-RADS version 2 to describe MRI features of prostate lesions. Methods Four hundred fifty-four patients were included in this retrospective, institutional review board–approved study. Patients received multiparametric (mp) MRI and subsequent prostate biopsy including MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy and 10-core systematic biopsy. PI-RADS lexicon terms describing lesion characteristics on mpMRI were assigned to lesions by experienced readers. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of each lexicon term were assessed using biopsy results as a reference standard. Results From a total of 501 lesions, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was present in 175 lesions (34.9%). Terms related to findings of restricted diffusion showed PPVs of up to 52.0%/43.9% and NPV of up to 91.8%/89.7% (peripheral zone or PZ/transition zone or TZ). T2-weighted imaging (T2W)–related terms showed a wide range of predictive values. For PZ lesions, high PPVs were found for “markedly hypointense,” “lenticular,” “lobulated,” and “spiculated” (PPVs between 67.2 and 56.7%). For TZ lesions, high PPVs were found for “water-drop-shaped” and “erased charcoal sign” (78.6% and 61.0%). The terms “encapsulated,” “organized chaos,” and “linear” showed to be good predictors for benignity with distinctively low PPVs between 5.4 and 6.9%. Most T2WI-related terms showed improved predictive values for TZ lesions when combined with DWI-related findings. Conclusions Lexicon terms with high discriminatory power were identified (e.g., “markedly hypointense,” “water-drop-shaped,” “organized chaos”). DWI-related terms can be useful for excluding TZ cancer. Combining T2WI- with DWI findings in TZ lesions markedly improved predictive values. Key Points • Lexicon terms describing morphological and functional features of prostate lesions on MRI show a wide range of predictive values for prostate cancer. • Some T2-related terms have favorable PPVs, e.g., “water-drop-shaped” and “organized chaos” while others show less distinctive predictive values. DWI-related terms have noticeable negative predictive values in TZ lesions making DWI feature a useful tool for exclusion of TZ cancer. • Combining DWI- and T2-related lexicon terms for assessment of TZ lesions markedly improves PPVs. Most T2-related lexicon terms showed a significant decrease in PPV when combined with negative findings for “DW hyperintensity.”

Background: Focal therapy (FT) is an option to treat localized prostate cancer (PCa) and preserve healthy prostate tissue in order to reduce known side effects from primary whole-gland treatment. The available FT modalities are manifold. Until now, national and international PCa guidelines have been cautious to propose recommendations regarding FT treatment since data from prospective controlled trials are lacking for most FT modalities. Moreover, none of the international guidelines provides a separate section on FT. In this purpose, we provide a synopsis of the consensus-based German S3 guidelines for a possible international use. Summary: The recently published update of the German S3 guidelines, an evidence- and consensus-based guideline, provides a section on FT with recommendations for diagnostic work-up, indications, modalities, and follow-up. This section consists of 12 statements and recommendations for FT in the treatment of localized PCa. Key Message: The German S3 guidelines on PCa are the first to incorporate recommendations for FT based on evidence and expert consensus including indication criteria for FT, pretreatment, and follow-up diagnostic pathways as well as an extended overview of FT techniques and the current supportive evidence.

We sought to characterize the adjusted outcomes of GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in high-medical-risk (HMR) patients using data from the largest international database.Data were obtained from the Global GreenLight Group (GGG) database which pools data of eight high-volume, experienced surgeons, from a total of seven international centers. Eligible study participants underwent GreenLight PVP using the XPS-180 W system between 2011 and 2019. HMR patients were defined as patients with ASA III or greater and were compared to non-HMR patients. Analyses were adjusted for patient age and prostate volume.In the HMR group, patients on average were older and had smaller prostates than the non-HMR control group. Compared to non-HMR patients, transfusions occurred more frequently (2.6% vs. 0.14%, p 0.01) and the odds of readmission were elevated [OR 2.0, (95% CI 1.4-2.8, p 0.01)] among HMR patients. Twelve months postoperatively, HMR patients experience greater improvement in QoL than the control group [+ 0.54 (95% CI 0.07-1.0, p = 0.02)]. PVR also decreased 93.1 ml more in HMR than in non-HMR patients after 12 months (95% CI 33.6-152.6, p 0.01).We found that GreenLight PVP is safe and effective in improving functional outcomes in higher-risk patients with severe systemic disease compared to their lower-risk counterparts. Though absolute risks remain low, GreenLight PVP is associated with higher odds of transfusion and readmission in the high-risk cohort. The findings of our study reaffirm current guidelines that propose PVP as a viable treatment option for HMR patients.

Purpose To evaluate changes in global perioperative data of GreenLight-XPS 180-Watt photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (GL-XPS) of the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) database. Methods 3441 men, who underwent GL-XPS for symptomatic BPH between 2011 and 2019 at seven high volume international centers, were included. Primary outcome measurements were operative time (OT; min), effective laser time (LT; min of OT), as well as intraoperative and postoperative adverse events (AEs), all analyzed by year of surgery (2011–2019) and prostate volume (PV) group ( 150 ml). Results The median age was 70 years (interquartile range 64–77), the median PV was 64 ml (IQR 47–90). The OT and LT slightly increased but stayed highly efficient all in all. Median OT was 60 min (IQR 45–83) and LT was 33 min (IQR 23–46). Median energy use was 253 kJ (IQR 170–375) with an energy density of 3.94 kJ/ml (IQR 2.94–5.02). The relative probability of perioperative AEs decreased by 17% each year (p p = 0.007). The early postoperative complications (within 30 days after surgery) decreased significantly from 48.8% (n = 106) in 2011 to 24.7% (n = 20) in 2019 (p > 0.001). Conclusion These findings from the GGG demonstrate significant improvement secondary to growing experience with GL-XPS between 2011 and 2019 in intraoperative AEs, including transfusions, and postoperative AEs. While staying highly efficient in OT and LT of GL-XPS within a 9-year period of experience.

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) assessment of osteoarthritis (OA) using high-frequency, research-grade single-element ultrasound systems has been reported. The objective of this ex vivo study was to assess the performance of QUS in detecting early OA using a high-frequency linear array transducer. Osteochondral plugs (n = 26) of human articular cartilage were scanned with ExactVu Micro-Ultrasound using an EV29L side-fire transducer. For comparison, the samples were also imaged with SAM200Ex, a custom 40-MHz scanning acoustic microscope with a single-element, focused transducer. Thirteen QUS parameters were derived from the ultrasound data. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, with T1 and T2 extracted as the quantitative parameters, were also acquired for comparison. Cartilage degeneration was graded from histology and correlated to all quantitative parameters. A maximum Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.75 was achieved using a combination of ExactVu QUS parameters, while a maximum ρ of 0.62 was achieved using a combination of parameters from SAM200Ex. A maximum ρ of 0.75 was achieved using the T1 and T2 MRI parameters. This study illustrates the potential of a high-frequency linear array transducer to provide a convenient method for early OA screening with results comparable to those of research-grade single-element ultrasound and MRI.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-directed and micro-ultrasonography (micro-US)-directed biopsy for detecting clinically significant (Grade Group >1) prostate cancer (csPCa). Materials and methods: A total of 203 patients were prospectively enrolled at three institutions across Germany and Austria in the period from January 2019 to December 2019. During each biopsy, the urologist was blinded to the mpMRI report until after the micro-US targets had been assessed. After unblinding, targets were then sampled using software-assisted fusion, followed by systematic samples. The primary outcome measure was non-inferiority of micro-US to detect csPCa, with a detection ratio of at least 80% that of mpMRI. Results: A total of 79 csPCa cases were detected overall (39%). Micro-US-targeted biopsy detected 58/79 cases (73%), while mpMRI-targeted biopsy detected 60/79 (76%) and non-targeted (completion sampling) samples detected 45/79 cases (57%). mpMRI-targeted samples alone detected 7/79 (9%) csPCa cases which were missed by micro-US-targeted and non-targeted samples. Three of these seven were anterior lesions with 2/7 in the transition zone. Micro-US-targeted samples alone detected 5/79 (6%) and completion sampling alone detected 4/79 cases (5%). Micro-US was non-inferior to mpMRI and detected 97% of the csPCa cases detected by mpMRI-targeted biopsy (95% CI 80-116%; P = 0.023). Conclusions: This is the first multicentre prospective study comparing micro-US-targeted biopsy with mpMRI-targeted biopsy. The study provides further evidence that micro-US can reliably detect cancer lesions and suggests that micro-US biopsy might be as effective as mpMRI for detection of csPCA. This result has significant implications for increasing accessibility, reducing costs and expediting diagnosis.

Previous analyses of the impact of median lobe presence on Greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) outcomes were limited by their small sample size and the ability to adjust for important confounders. As such, we sought to investigate the impact of prostate median lobe presence on the operative outcomes of 180 W XPS GreenLight PVP using a large international database. Data were obtained from the Global GreenLight Group (GGG) database which pools data of eight high-volume, experienced surgeons, from a total of seven international centers. All men with established benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent GreenLight PVP using the XPS-180 W system between 2011 and 2019 were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned to two groups based on presence or absence of median lobes. Analyses were adjusted for patient age, prostate volume, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score. A total of 1650 men met the inclusion criteria. A median lobe was identified in 621 (37.6%) patients. Baseline prostate volume, patient age, and ASA score varied considerably between the two groups. In adjusted analyses, the operative and lasing time of patients with median lobes was 6.72 (95% CI 3.22–10.23; p

Introduction High-resolution micro-ultrasound has the capability of imaging prostate cancer based on detecting alterations in ductal anatomy, analogous to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). This technology has the potential advantages of relatively low cost, simplicity, and accessibility compared to mpMRI. This multicenter, prospective registry aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of mpMRI with high-resolution micro-ultrasound imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Methods We included 1040 subjects at 11 sites in seven countries who had prior mpMRI and underwent ExactVu micro-ultrasound-guided biopsy. Biopsies were taken from both mpMRI targets (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] >3 and micro-ultrasound targets (Prostate Risk Identification using Micro-ultrasound [PRIMUS] >3). Systematic biopsies (up to 14 cores) were also performed. Various strategies were used for mpMRI target sampling, including cognitive fusion with micro-ultrasound, separate software-fusion systems, and software-fusion using the micro-ultrasound FusionVu system. Clinically significant cancer was those with Gleason grade group ≥2. Results Overall, 39.5% were positive for clinically significant prostate cancer. Micro-ultrasound and mpMRI sensitivity was 94% vs. 90%, respectively (p=0.03), and NPV was 85% vs. 77%, respectively. Specificities of micro-ultrasound and MRI were both 22%, with similar PPV (44% vs. 43%). This represents the initial experience with the technology at most of the participating sites and, therefore, incorporates a learning curve. Number of cores, diagnostic strategy, blinding to MRI results, and experience varied between sites. Conclusions In this initial multicenter registry, micro-ultrasound had comparable or higher sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer compared to mpMRI, with similar specificity. Micro-ultrasound is a low-cost, single-session option for prostate screening and targeted biopsy. Further larger-scale studies are required for validation of these findings.

Focal therapy (FT) with its favorable side-effect profile represents an option between active surveillance and traditional whole-gland treatment in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Consensus statements recommend eligibility criteria based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted and systematic combination biopsy.To estimate the future potential of FT by analyzing the number of men eligible for FT among all men with biopsy-proven PCa and to judge the potential of different energy sources.Consensus criteria on FT were analyzed. Patients with biopsy-proven PCa from six tertiary referral hospitals and one outpatient practice in Germany had received a software-based combination biopsy. Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions based on PI-RADS v2 were included.Patients were analyzed for potential treatment by FT and hemiablation. MRI lesions were mapped according to prostatic zones.In total, 2371 patients were analyzed. According to consensus criteria (biopsy-proven unifocal lesion of International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group ≤2, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤15ng/mL, and life expectancy10yr), 303 patients (12.8%; ISUP 1: n=148 [6.2%]; ISUP 2: n=155 [6.5%]) were potential candidates for FT. A maximum PSA level of10ng/mL would exclude further 60 (2.5%) of these men. The eligibility for hemiablation is slightly higher (16.2%). Unifocal lesions (n=288) were equally distributed within the prostate (anteriorly [31%], apically [29%], and dorsally [36%]).With adherence to consensus statements, only a minority of PCa patients present as potential candidates for FT. Distribution of tumor localization suggests the need for different energy modalities to warrant an optimal FT treatment.We analyzed how many men who receive a magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy are candidates for the experimental focal therapy of the prostate. When following expert recommendations, only a small number of men are potential candidates for this alternative treatment.

Introduction: In living donor transplantation choosing the right donor and donor side for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a challenging task in clinical practice. Knowledge about anomalies in renal blood supply are crucial to evaluate the feasibility of the operative procedure. Few data so far exist whether the existence of a retroaortic left renal vein has an impact on living kidney transplantation outcome for donor and recipient. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 221 patients who underwent laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy between 2011 and 2017 for existence of a retroaortic left renal vein. Clinical characteristics and operative outcomes for donors and recipients were analyzed. Results: 221 patients underwent donor nephrectomy between 2011 and 2017; 11 patients (4.98%) showed the feature of a retroaortic left renal vein, and in 8 patients (72.7%) out of those 11 the left kidney was chosen for transplantation. Mean preoperative serum creatinine was 0.77 (0.49–0.98) mg/dL and 1.28 (0.97–1.64) mg/dL at discharge. In recipients mean serum creatinine preoperatively, after 1 week, 1 month,1 year, 2 and 3 years of follow-up was 10.36 (6.09–20.77) mg/dL, 1.71 (0.67–2.72), 1.33 (0.70–1.89), 1.31 (0.95–2.13), 1.31 (0.98–2.13) and 1.33 (1.03–1.84), respectively. Neither donors nor recipients suffered from any operative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy of a left kidney with retroaortic renal vein is safe for the donor, without limitation in the outcome for the recipient.

In the current review, we will discuss the state of the literature of vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). We discuss two methods of vaporization of the prostate: Transurethral Vaporization of the Prostate (TUVP) and Greenlight Photo-selective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP). A comprehensive review of the literature was performed on TUVP and PVP. The literature on transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was also extensively reviewed as a comparative surgical method. The evidence shows that TUVP appears to be the safer choice, as compared to TURP due to less intra- and peri-operative complications. PVP was associated with less bleeding complications than TURP with outpatient discharge. Importantly, PVP was not associated with serious bleeding events requiring blood transfusions or medical treatment in patients under anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapies. PVP was also shown to be a cost-effective option compared to TURP. Prostate vaporization for the treatment of BPE appears to be an efficient and safer alternative to TURP. Vaporization techniques, particularly Greenlight PVP, should be offered to most men, especially those under anticoagulation therapy, as well as patients at risk of bleeding complications.

Background Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) revolutionized the implementation of prostate biopsies, a considerable amount of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is missed when performing mpMRI-targeted biopsies only. Microultrasound (micro-US) is a new modality that allows real-time targeting of suspicious regions. Objective To evaluate micro-US of the prostate with real-time targeting of suspicious regions in patients suspected to have prostate cancer (PCa). Design, setting, and participants We examined 159 patients with prior mpMRI and suspicion of PCa with micro-US in the period from February to December 2018. Micro-US lesions were documented according to the prostate risk identification for micro-US (PRI-MUS) protocol, and were blinded to the mpMRI results and targeted independently of the mpMRI lesions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The main outcomes were cancer detection rate, additional detection of csPCa, and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group upgrading via micro-US. Results and limitations PCa was found in 113/159 (71%) men, with 49% (78/159) having clinically significant cancer (csPCa; ISUP ≥ 2). Micro-US–targeted biopsies resulted in a higher ISUP grade group than the nontargeted biopsies in 26% (42/159), compared with both nontargeted and MRI-targeted biopsies in 16% (26/159). In 17% (27/159) of patients, targeted mpMRI–guided biopsy was negative with cancer identified in the micro-US–guided biopsy, of whom 20 had csPCa. The comparison with only MRI-positive patients is the main limitation of this analysis. Conclusions Our data show an added benefit of micro-US in addition to mpMRI-targeted biopsies in a population of men at risk of PCa. A novel biopsy protocol with solely targeted biopsy with micro-US and mpMRI seems possible, replacing conventional ultrasound and omitting standard systematic biopsies. Patient summary In this report, we looked at the performance of microultrasound in the setting of diagnosing prostate cancer. We found that microultrasound is a good addition to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate and presents an alternative for men who may not undergo MRI.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Amongst the surgical treatment modalities available, Greenlight photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (GL-PVP) has gained international acceptance as a safe and ef...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:This study aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of mpMRI with the novel high-resolution micro-ultrasound imaging modality. This approach offers the b...

Purpose of Review In the setting of kidney transplantation, the ureter is a common source for complications. As a result, prevention of ureteral complications and their management is of crucial importance. In this context, the purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature on the ureter in the kidney transplant setting with a special focus on new findings. We conducted a PubMed and Medline search over the last 10 years to identify all new publications related to ureteroneoimplantations, stents and management of complications in the kidney transplant setting. Recent Findings Performance of the “Lich-Gregoir” technique for ureteroneocystostomy seems to be favourable in regard to postoperative complications when compared with other methods described in the literature. Moreover, major urologic complications can be further reduced by ureteral stenting. Summary A new approach for management of ureteral strictures in renal transplants is presented. We discussed the usage of a ureteral stent covered with a biostable polymer aiming to prevent tissue ingrowth into the lumen as a new option for management of ureteral stricture in the kidney transplant setting.

Objective To investigate non-inferiority of intermittent docetaxel compared to continuous docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patient and methods The investigator initiated randomised phase III study included 187 chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRPC who were allocated to two treatment arms: intermittent docetaxel and continuous docetaxel. Docetaxel was applied in both arms as weekly (35 mg/m2 ) or 3-weekly (75 mg/m2 ). The primary endpoint was 1-year survival, which was tested for non-inferiority (margin δ = 0.125). The secondary endpoints were: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), median time to treatment failure (TTF), and toxicity. Results Of 156 eligible patients, 78 were allocated to each arm. The intermittent treatment met the non-inferiority criteria for 1-year survival (two-sided 95% confidence interval, -0.12, 18, P = 0.022), but not for OS, according to the result of a post hoc analysis. The differences between the study arms in PFS and TTF were not significant. The median (range) treatment holiday in the intermittent arm was 110 (13-486) days, or 38% of the overall treatment duration. Safety profiles of both study arms were comparable. The main limitation of this study was that the planned number of patients could not be recruited. Conclusion Intermittent docetaxel chemotherapy was non-inferior to continuous therapy for 1-year survival; non-inferiority in regard to OS was not reached.

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate progression of GreenLight-XPS 180 W photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GL-XPS) with respect to effectiveness, efficacy, and safety over time at a tertiary referral high volume center. Methods: The retrospective study included 375 men who underwent GL-XPS for symptomatic benign prostate obstruction (BPO) between June 2010 and February 2015. Primary outcome measurements were operation time (OT; min) and effective laser time (LT; min of OT) analyzed with regard to prostatic volume (PV; mL) (group 1 80 mL in 20 mL steps) and the year of surgery (2010–2015). Results: The median age was 72 years (range 64–79), the median PV was 58 mL (range 33–98) and the median PV increased from 42 mL in 2012 to 80 mL in 2015. The OT and LT clearly correlated with the PV, being doubled for glands of median 95 mL compared to median 30 mL while the applied laser energy per LT likewise steadily increased. Overall, both OT and LT could be significantly reduced each year by 37% (OT; p < 0.05) and 36% (LT; p < 0.05) within 5 years. The hospital stay (days) and catheterization time (days) remained constant, without any changes over time. The overall complication rate (Clavien-Dindo >2) ranged from 36 to 15% between 2010 and 2015. The pre (median 22 + 4) and postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score-Quality of Life (median 5 + 1) showed a sufficient reduction in symptomatic BPO. Conclusion: GL-XPS is a safe and effective surgical method for symptomatic BPO. Our single center experience showed a significant improvement of both OT and effective LT within 5 years whilst maintaining stable low complication rate and high patient satisfaction.

Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate changes of patient characteristics and surgical techniques in radical prostatectomy in Germany within the last decade. Methods Data from 44 German prostate cancer centers were included in the study. Patients’ characteristics (age, initial PSA value), surgical techniques (open vs. minimally invasive approaches), perioperative parameters (operating time, rate of nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomies (RPs), hospitalization time, catheter indwelling time, surgical margin status, number of dissected lymph nodes (LN)), and pathological findings (tumor stage, Gleason score) were analyzed. Results Data from 11,675 patients who underwent RP between 2005 and 2014 were analyzed. The rate of open RP approaches decreased by 1.7% (p = 0.0164), the rate of minimally invasive approaches increased by 1.8% (p = 0.0164). Robot-assisted RPs (RARP) increased by 4.6% (p

For men experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) refractory to medical therapy, there have been numerous developments in the treatment options offered for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the recent years. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has remained the reference standard for men with prostates sized 30 cc-80 cc, while open prostatectomy is universally guidelines-recommended in the absence of enucleation, for men with prostates larger than 80 cc-100 cc. While these techniques are effective, they have the potential for bleeding complications requiring transfusions, electrolyte abnormalities such as TURP syndrome, and often require prolonged hospitalization. GreenLight photoselective vaporization (GL-PVP) with the XPS LBO-180W system offers a minimally invasive treatment that can be carried out on essential any sized prostate gland. In addition, the GL-PVP procedure can be done as a same day discharge surgery requiring no overnight hospital admission and allows patients to continue any necessary anti-coagulants given the significantly reduced risks of bleeding complications or TURP syndrome. In 2005, the anatomic vaporization-incision technique (VIT) using the XPS LBO-180W system was described to address larger prostate volumes. VIT combines principles of traditional GL-PVP and enucleation techniques to identify the reference surgical capsule early-on into the surgery and resect portions of prostate adenoma without the need for tissue morcellation. Early studies comparing anatomic VIT to standard PVP outcomes demonstrated significant improvements of IPSS and uroflowmetry parameters, along with statistically significant greater PSA reduction at 6 months, particularly in prostate volumes greater than 80 cc. The objective of this article is to detail our surgical approach to the anatomic GreenLight laser vaporization-incision technique using the XPS LBO-180W system, based on extensive personal experience with both enucleation and vaporization techniques using various laser technologies. Standardization of the VIT based on proper cystoscopy, knowledge of prostate anatomy with preoperative ultrasound, and routine technique is essential to developing consistent, reproducible and optimal surgical outcomes.

Introduction: Patients with consistent suspicion for prostate cancer (PCa) and multiple negative prebiopsies prior to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are still frequently evaluated for an image-guided biopsy and are reported with heterogeneous detection rates. The inclusion of a systematic biopsy (SB) is also still recommended with predominant sampling within the posterior/peripheral zone of the prostate. The aim of this study was (I) to evaluate PCa detection rates using a modified 10 core SB template including anterior biopsies in combination with mpMRI/ultrasound fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB) in patients with 3 or more negative prebiopsies and (II) to compare mpMRI index lesion localization with histologically confirmed locali­zation from associated prostatectomy samples. Methods: Overall 1,337 consecutive patients underwent sensor-based registration TB of the prostate and a subsequent 10-core SB between January 2012 and December 2015 at our institution. For this study, 101 patients with ≥3 negative prebiopsies and prostate imaging – reporting data system lesions ≥3 were pooled prospectively and underwent TB and a modified SB including 2 ventral (anterior) biopsies. Detection rates were estimated for the modified SB, TB, and its combination. A subgroup analysis of 35 patients undergoing prostatectomy was performed by a head-to-head comparison of mpMRI index lesion and histologically confirmed PCa index lesion localization. Results: The overall detection rate for PCa was 54.5%. The combination of TB and SB detected 14 (25.4%) more cases missed by TB alone (p < 0.001) and 7 (12.7%) more cases missed by SB alone (p = 0.016), respectively. A postoperative Gleason upgrade was seen in 12/35 (34.3%) cases within the TB group and in 14/35 (40.0%) in the SB group, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed a predominant location of PCa index lesions anteriorly at the level of the midgland. The MRI detection rate of the anteriorly located index lesions was 70.4% (15/21 cases) with a clinically significant Gleason score (≥3 + 4 = 7a [International Society of Urological Pathology grade 2]) in 80.9%. Interestingly a modified SB template detected 90.5% (19/21) of the anteriorly located index lesions. Conclusion: Our data suggest that in patients with multiple prebiopsies PCa seems to be predominantly located anteriorly. We suggest the general integration of anterior biopsies despite TB in repeat biopsy patients.

Ein Teil der Prostatakarzinome wird in der primaren Prostatabiopsie nicht detektiert, sodass bei weiterbestehendem Verdacht eine erneute Biopsie erfolgen muss. Neben der Problematik der Falsch-negativ-Rate in der systematischen Biopsie, besteht eine hohe Missklassifikationsrate, insbesondere das Tumorgrading betreffend. Dadurch kann es zu einer verspateten Diagnose aggressiverer Tumoreigenschaften und im ungunstigsten Falle zu einem Versaumnis kurativer Ansatze kommen. Aufgrund dieser Problematik bestehen zahlreiche Ansatze, die Therapieentscheidung und Uberwachung durch den Einsatz moderner Bildgebung und genetischer Biomarker zu optimieren Der Beitrag vermittelt eine Ubersicht uber die Active-Surveillance(AS)-Definitionen, die Problematik der Prostatakarzinomdetektion und genaue Grading-Abschatzung in der systematischen transrektalen Biopsie und den Einsatz der multiparametrischen MRT (mpMRT), der gezielten MRT- Fusionsbiopsie und genetischer Biomarker als potenzielle Losungsansatze sowie deren Integration im klinischen Alltag. Aktuelle Literatur wurde recherchiert und im Kontext mit eigenen Erfahrungen ausgewertet. Die mpMRT sowie die gezielte MRT-Fusionsbiopsie sind dem aktuellen Standard der systematischen Biopsie in der Detektion des klinisch signifikanten Prostatakarzinoms uberlegen. Besonders deutlich zeigt sich dies im Falle der Wiederholungsbiopsie des anterioren Prostatakarzinoms, einer persistierend suspekten PSA-Dynamik und Einschluss und Monitoring von AS-Patienten. Auch die Kombination mit weiteren neuartigen Pradiktoren sind weitere vielversprechende Ansatze. Der potenzielle diagnostische Mehrwert kann ausschlieslich durch eine interdisziplinare Verknupfung der zunehmend komplexeren diagnostischen Schritte erreicht werden. Effektive Losungen im Rahmen der interdisziplinaren Zusammenarbeit von Radiologen und Urologen auf Niveau der Fachgesellschaften sind notwendig, um Fragen bezuglich des Zeitaufwands und der Ressourcenverteilung mit den Leistungserstattern zu adressieren.

Es existieren zahlreiche Systeme zur MRT/TRUS-fusionierten Biopsie der Prostata. Insgesamt liegt ausreichend Literatur zur Fusionsbiopsie vor, die einen Vorteil bei der Tumordetektion und der Diagnosequalitat gegenuber der Randombiopsie belegt. Der Nutzen der Systeme im Rahmen der fokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms (PC) ist unklar. Ziel war die kritische Prufung der vorhandenen Fusionssysteme fur die Planung und Verlaufskontrolle einer fokalen Therapie des PC. Es erfolgte eine systematische Literaturrecherche zu den erhaltlichen Fusionssystemen fur den Zeitraum 2013–5/2016. Durch den Arbeitskreis „Fokale und Mikrotherapie“ wurde ein Kriterienkatalog zu technischen Details, der Eignung in speziellen Situationen und der Eignung im Rahmen der fokalen Therapie des PC erstellt. Acht Fusionssysteme wurden betrachtet (Artemis™, BioJet, BiopSee®, iSR’obot™ Mona Lisa, Hitachi HI-RVS, UroNav und Urostation®). Unterschiede zwischen den Systemen bestehen u. a. in der Art der Biopsie (transrektal, perineal, beides moglich), im Fusionsmodus (starr bzw. elastisch), in der Navigationsart (bildbasiert, elektromagnetisch bzw. mechanisch) sowie im Platzbedarf. Fusionssysteme werden im Rahmen der fokalen Therapie des PC von verschiedenen Konsensusgruppen empfohlen. Wunschenswerte Eigenschaften sind neben dem „needle tracking“ die Ubertragbarkeit des Biopsiedatensatzes in ein Behandlungsgerat (Artemis™, BiopSee® und Urostation®: jeweils mit Focal One®, BiopSee®, Hitachi HI-RVS: jeweils mit Nanoknife®, BioJet und BiopSee®: Kryoablation, Brachytherapie). Studien zur Planung einer fokalen Therapie liegen nur fur vereinzelte Systeme vor und fehlen fur die Verlaufskontrolle nach fokaler Therapie.

Hintergrund: Nach Einfuhrung der revidierten Version des PI-RADS Scoring Systems kann eine scorebedingte Varianz zwischen Version 1 und 2 vermutet werden. Ziel unserer Studie war ein Vergleich der PI-RADS Scores der Version 1 (V1) und der aktualisierten Version 2 (V2). Material und Methoden: 61 Patienten mit biop- siegesichertem Prostatakarzinom (PCa) und 90 detektierten Lasionen im prabioptischen, multiparametrischen 3-Tesla MRT wurden in die retrospektive Analyse eingeschlossen. Die Lasionen wurden durch 2 erfahrene Radiologen im Konsensus bewertet. Zwischen Version 1 und 2 differierende Lasionsscores wurden naher analysiert. Falls vorhanden floss die Histologie einer radikalen Prostatektomie (RP) mit in die Untersuchung ein. Ergebnisse: Der PI-RADS V1 und V2 Score unterschied sich bei 52% der Patienten (32/61) und in 39% der Lasionen (35/90). Die Lasionsscores unterschieden sich zum einen wegen des Summenscores in V1 gegenuber dem kategorialen System in V2 (bei 51% der Lasionen: 18/35), zum anderen durch die neue, lasionsgrosenbedingte Trennung zwischen PI-RADS 4 und 5 (bei 31% der Lasionen: 11/35). Bei 17% der Lasionen (6/35) lies sich kein Grund fur den Unterschied finden. Die RP Subgruppe deutet auf eine bessere Detektion von PCas mit GS 3+3 und GS 3+4 in V2 hin. Schlussfolgerung: Die PI-RADS Scores prostatischer Lasionen weisen zwischen V1 und V2 haufig Unterschiede auf, wobei die Hauptgrunde dafur scorebedingt sind. Bei Patienten mit einer RP verbesserte PI-RADS V2 die Detektion von low-risk PCas, erbrachte aber im Vergleich zu V1 keine genauere Unterscheidung von GS 3+4 und GS>/=4+3. Die systembedingten Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Versionen und den daraus resultierenden PI-RADS Scores sollten in der urologischen Praxis berucksichtig werden.

Prostate volume in multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is of clinical importance. For 3-Tesla mpMRI without endorectal coil, there is no distinctive standard for volume calculation. We tested the accuracy of the ellipsoid formula with planimetric volume measurements as reference and investigated the correlation of gland volume and cancer detection rate on MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy. One hundred forty-three patients with findings on 3-Tesla mpMRI suspicious of cancer and subsequent MRI/US fusion-guided targeted biopsy and additional systematic biopsy were analyzed. T2-weighted images were used for measuring the prostate diameters and for planimetric volume measurement by a segmentation software. Planimetric and calculated prostate volumes were compared with clinical data. The median prostate volume was 48.1 ml (interquartile range (IQR) 36.9-62.1 ml). Volume calculated by the ellipsoid formula showed a strong concordance with planimetric volume, with a tendency to underestimate prostate volume (median volume 43.1 ml (IQR 31.2-58.8 ml); r = 0.903, p < 0.001). There was a moderate, significant inverse correlation of prostate volume to a positive biopsy result (r = -0.24, p = 0.004). The ellipsoid formula gives sufficient approximation of prostate volume on 3-Tesla mpMRI without endorectal coil. It allows a fast, valid volume calculation in prostate MRI datasets.

Purpose To evaluate if size-based cut-offs based on MR imaging can successfully assess clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCA). The goal was to improve the currently applied size-based differentiation criterion in PI-RADS. Methods and materials MRIs of 293 patients who had undergone 3 T MR imaging with subsequent confirmation of prostate cancer on systematic and targeted MRI/TRUS-fusion biopsy were re-read by three radiologists. All identifiable tumors were measured on T2WI for lesions originating in the transition zone (TZ) and on DWI for lesions from the peripheral zone (PZ) and tabulated against their Gleason grade. Results 309 lesions were analyzed, 213 (68.9 %) in the PZ and 96 (31.1 %) in the TZ. ROC-Analysis showed a stronger correlation between lesion size and clinically significant (defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2) prostate cancer (PCa) for the PZ (AUC = 0.73) compared to the TZ (AUC = 0.63). The calculated Youden index resulted in size cut-offs of 14 mm for PZ and 21 mm for TZ tumors. Conclusion Size cut-offs can be used to stratify prostate cancer with different optimal size thresholds in the peripheral zone and transition zone. There was a clearer separation of clinically significant tumors in peripheral zone cancers compared to transition zone cancers. Future iterations of PI-RADS could therefore take different size-based cut-offs for peripheral zone and transition zone cancers into account.

296 Background: This study aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of mpMRI with the novel high-resolution micro-ultrasound imaging modality. This approach offers the benefits of simplicity, a single intervention for imaging and biopsy, leveraging the low cost of ultrasound. Micro-ultrasound may be used to image suspicious lesions and target biopsies in real-time with or without additional MRI-based targets. Methods: Data from 9 sites was aggregated, totaling 866 subjects presenting for ExactVu micro-ultrasound guided biopsy with available mpMRI studies. Samples in all subjects were taken from mpMRI targets and micro-ultrasound targets, with up to 12 systematic samples filled in. Various strategies were used for mpMRI target sampling including cognitive fusion with micro-ultrasound, separate software-fusion systems, and software-fusion using the micro-ultrasound FusionVu system. Clinically significant cancer was considered any Gleason Sum > 6 and targeted samples were taken for PI-RADS > 2 or PRI-MUS1 > 2 lesions. Results: Overall, 39% of all biopsy cases were positive for clinically significant PCa. mpMRI demonstrated 89% sensitivity and NPV of 77%. Compared to mpMRI, micro-ultrasound sensitivity (95%) and NPV (87%) were higher. Micro-ultrasound was less specific (21% vs 23% for mpMRI) with similar PPV (44% vs 43%). The aggregate effect demonstrates higher sensitivity for csPCa with micro-ultrasound compared to mpMRI (p

To evaluate the accuracy of clinical parameters and established pre-treatment risk stratification systems for prostate cancer (PCa) in predicting PSMA-positive metastases in men undergoing Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT as initial staging examination.A retrospective analysis in 108 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-proven PCa undergoing Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT (median age, 72 years [range, 49-82 years]) was performed. Prediction of PSMA-positive metastases by serum PSA, clinical T stage (cT), ISUP group, percentage of positive biopsy cores, and derived risk scores (D'Amico risk classification system, Roach [RF], Yale formula [YF], and Briganti nomogram [BN]) was examined with ROC analysis.Any PSMA-positive metastases were found in 36 of 108 patients, including LN metastases in 28 patients, extrapelvic LN metastases in 15 patients, and organ metastases in 19 patients (bone, 19; lung, 1). AUCs for PSA, cT, ISUP, and percentage of positive biopsy cores regarding PSMA-positive metastases did not differ significantly (range, 0.6-0.8; each P 0.05). D'Amico (AUC, 0.61-0.64) was inferior to RF (0.76-0.83), YF (0.81-0.86), and BN (0.73 to 0.88; each P 0.05). Among the 89 high-risk patients (D'Amico), decision for or against PET imaging based on RF (cut-off,18.0), YF (10.8), or BN (8.0) would have prevented PSMA PET/CT in 4 (5%), 15 (17%), or 18 patients (20%), respectively, while preserving a sensitivity ≥95% for PSMA-positive metastases.Clinical parameters and established risk stratification systems for PCa can predict Ga-68-PSMA PET-positive metastases in treatment-naïve patients. Especially YF and BN may improve identification of patients with the highest probability of metastatic disease detected by Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT.

The second version of the PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) was introduced in 2015 to standardize the interpretation and reporting of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Recently low cancer detection rates were reported for PI-RADS version 2 category 4 lesions. Therefore the aim of the study was to evaluate the cancer detection rate of PI-RADS version 2 in a large prospective cohort.The study included 704 consecutive men with primary or prior negative biopsies who underwent magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy and 10-core systematic prostate biopsy between September 2015 and May 2017. All lesions were rated according to PI-RADS version 2 and lesions with PI-RADS version 2 category 3 or greater were biopsied. An ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) score of 2 or greater (ie Gleason 3 + 4 or greater) was defined as clinically significant prostate cancer.The overall cancer detection rate of PI-RADS version 2 categories 3, 4 and 5 was 39%, 72% and 91% for all prostate cancer, and 23%, 49% and 77% for all clinically significant prostate cancer, respectively. If only targeted biopsy had been performed, 59 clinically significant tumors (16%) would have been missed. The PI-RADS version 2 score was significantly associated with the presence of prostate cancer (p0.001), the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (p0.001) and the ISUP grade (p0.001).PI-RADS version 2 is significantly associated with the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer. The cancer detection rate of PI-RADS version 2 category 4 lesions was considerably higher than previously reported. When performing targeted biopsy, the combination with systematic biopsy still provides the highest detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE To examine the performance of a primary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasonography (US) fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB), and in combination with an added systematic biopsy (SB). PATIENTS AND METHODS Analysis of 318 consecutive biopsy-naive men with suspicious multiparametric MRI (mpMRI; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3) undergoing transrectal TB and 10-core SB between January 2012 and December 2016. The indication for performing mpMRI was based on clinical parameters and decided by the treating urologist before admission. TB was performed with a sensor-based MRI/US fusion-guided platform. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as Gleason score ≥4 + 3 = 7 (International Society of Urological Pathology Grade [ISUP] grade 3) or maximum cancer core length of ≥6 mm. RESULTS A median (interquartile range) of 14 (13-14) biopsies per case were taken. The overall cancer detection rate (CDR) was 77% (245/318). The TB alone detected 67% of prostate cancers and the SB alone detected 70%. The PI-RADS dependent CDR for the combination of TB/SB were 38% (21/55), 78% (120/154) and 95% (104/109) for PI-RADS scores of 3/4/5, respectively. Clinically significant prostate cancer was diagnosed by the combination of TB and SB in 195 men (61%) and by TB alone in 163 cases (51%). The number of missed or underestimated prostate cancers with a Gleason score ≥8 for TB alone was 31 (10%, P < 0.001) and 21 (7%, P < 0.001) for SB alone in comparison with the results of the combination of TB and SB. The rate of insignificant prostate cancer was comparable for the combination of TB and SB and TB alone (50/318, 16% vs 50/318, 16%). CONCLUSIONS Pre-biopsy mpMRI is of incremental value in increasing the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with suspicion of prostate cancer. Combining TB with SB further improved the diagnostic accuracy without increasing the rate of insignificant prostate cancer.