166 results on '"Hannikainen, Ivar R."'
Search Results
2. Understanding rule enforcement using drift diffusion models
3. Broad, subjective, relative: the surprising folk concept of basic needs
4. The Natural Law Thesis Under Empirical Scrutiny
5. Normality and the Treatment-Enhancement Distinction
6. Why Blame the Ostrich?
7. Purposes in Law and in Life: An Experimental Investigation of Purpose Attribution
8. What Do We Mean by Precedent? Empirical Evidence of Ordinary Usage
9. Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives
10. Treatments approved, boosts eschewed: Moral limits of neurotechnological enhancement
11. Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent systems in deceased organ donation: a cross-national survey
12. The typicality effect in basic needs
13. Experimental Philosophical Bioethics of Personal Identity
14. Does moral valence influence the construal of alternative possibilities?
15. Strong Bipartisan Support for Controlled Psilocybin Use as Treatment or Enhancement in a Representative Sample of US Americans: Need for Caution in Public Policy Persists
16. The Brain Death Criterion in Light of Value-Based Disagreement Versus Biomedical Uncertainty
17. The dark path to eternal life: Machiavellianism predicts approval of mind upload technology
18. Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference
19. How pills undermine skills: Moralization of cognitive enhancement and causal selection
20. Guilt Without Fault: Accidental Agency in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles
21. Legal decision-making and the abstract/concrete paradox
22. Moral migration: Desires to become more empathic predict changes in moral foundations
23. Broad, subjective, relative: the surprising folk concept of basic needs
24. The True Self and Decision-Making Capacity.
25. Fuller and the Folk
26. Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?
27. Sacrificing objects instead of persons: Order effects without emotional engagement
28. Moral appraisals guide intuitive legal determinations.
29. Experimental Philosophical Bioethics, Advance Directives and the True Self in Dementia
30. Family bereavement and organ donation in Spain: a mixed method, prospective cohort study protocol
31. Trolleys, triage and Covid-19: the role of psychological realism in sacrificial dilemmas
32. Normality and the treatment-enhancement distinction
33. Rethinking the Role of Experimental Philosophy in Bioethics
34. Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism
35. Purposes in Law and in Life: An Experimental Investigation of Purpose Attribution
36. Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent to deceased organ donation: A comparative cross-sectional survey
37. Are There Cross‐Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law
38. The experimental jurisprudence of the concept of rule: Implications for the Hart-Fuller debate
39. Who has a free speech problem? Motivated censorship across the ideological divide
40. Additional file 1 of Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent systems in deceased organ donation: a cross-national survey
41. Purposes in Law and in Life: An Experimental Investigation of Purpose Attribution.
42. Coordination Favors Legal Textualism by Suppressing Moral Valuation
43. For Whom Does Determinism Undermine Moral Responsibility? Surveying the Conditions for Free Will Across Cultures
44. Are There Cross‐Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law
45. Whose Words Hurt? Contextual Determinants of Offensive Speech
46. Justice Before Expediency: A Social Intuitionist Model of Criminalization
47. sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672211026128 – Supplemental material for Whose Words Hurt? Contextual Determinants of Offensive Speech
48. Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies
49. Advancing Methods in Empirical Bioethics: Bioxphi Meets Digital Technologies
50. Absolutely Right and Relatively Good: Consequentialists See Bioethical Disagreement in a Relativist Light
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.