Search

It has become evident that laparoscopic myomectomy is limited by size, number and location of fibroids. Myomectomy performed by laparotomy can be technically challenging and the surgical benefits have to be weighed against associated risks and impairing fertile potential, especially in multiple and large fibroids that may be positioned close to the cavity. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of microsurgical myomectomy technique on perioperative morbidity in premenopausal women.This retrospective study included 228 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids and/or infertility undergoing myomectomy by laparotomy. As much as 156 patients were treated by standardized microsurgical technique and 72 patients by conventional myomectomy. The following data were recorded and analysed: postoperative haemoglobin, haemoglobin decrease, rate of blood transfusion, and number, size and location of myomas.In 228 patients, seven complications occurred (abdominal wall haematoma, bowel and colon injury, transient ileus). The transfusion rate was 1.3%. Microsurgical technique was associated with a smaller haemoglobin decrease compared to conventional myomectomy (1.77 vs. 2.38 g/dl; P = 0.007). Microsurgical technique correlated inversely with haemoglobin decrease (P0.001). Haemoglobin decrease correlated positively with myoma number (P0.001), size of myoma (P0.001) and the opening of the cavum uteri (P = 0.014).In this large series of abdominal myomectomies, procedure-related morbidity, mainly perioperative blood loss, was amongst the lowest reported when microsurgical techniques were used. In patients with multiple, large or deep intramural fibroids who desire future pregnancies, the use of microsurgical techniques may decrease intraoperative blood loss and perioperative morbidity.

Objectives In most cases, XX or XY gonadal dysgenesis remains genetically unexplained. In this pilot study we searched for sex-chromosomal mosaicism in gonads of patients with XX or XY gonadal dysgenesis of undetermined origin. Study Design Gonadal tissues were analyzed by cytogenetic and interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) analyses in four patients with gonadal dysgenesis and normal female (46,XX) or male (46,XY) karyotypes in lymphocytes. Results Cytogenetic and FISH analyses of the gonads demonstrated in three patients a sex-chromosomal mosaicism. Cytogenetic analysis of gonadal tissue of the fourth patient confirmed the result of the lymphocytes with 46,XX, but FISH analysis revealed in 17% of nuclei only one X-chromosome. Conclusion Our data indicate that sex-chromosomal mosaicism in gonads may be a frequent cause of gonadal dysgenesis despite of normal karyotypes in lymphocytes. Therefore, cytogenetic and FISH analyses of gonadal tissue can provide important information in unexplained cases of gonadal dysgenesis.