Search

Background: Molecular markers may identify subgroups of patients with clinically distinct behavior and response to treatment. In some gastrointestinal tumors, KRAS has prognostic value and negative predictive value. This is the first prospective study to report the outcome of combination chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients with KRAS mutation. Methods: From 2009 to 2015, 25 patients were included from two Scandinavian centers. Main inclusion criteria were non-resectable biliary tract cancer, ECOG performance status 0–2 and tumor KRAS mutation. A bi-weekly cycle of chemotherapy was administered as gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, followed by 7 days of oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2. Response evaluation was done every six treatment and the primary endpoint was the fraction with progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months. The study also included a non-preplanned analysis of circulating tumor specific DNA. Results: Chemotherapy was given for a median of 5 months (range 0–14) and among 17 patients evaluable for response, best responses were complete response (1), partial response (2), and stable disease (14). Eighteen patients had CT-verified progression, six died between evaluations and one patient is still progression-free. Median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI 3.1–11.0) and median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.6–14.3). The fraction with PFS at 6 months was 52% (95% CI 31–69%). Exploratory analyses found an improved survival in patients with a low level of plasma DNA. Conclusion: Pretreatment molecular characterization was feasible in BTC, but the rate of KRAS mutations was low. The study met its primary endpoint with a fraction of PFS at six months of 52%. The effect of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in this selected population was comparable to results from unselected groups with PFS and OS of 6.8 and 11.2 months, respectively. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00779454 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Adjuvant chemotherapy is established routine therapy for colon cancer (CC) patients with radically resected stage III and 'high-risk' stage II disease. The decision on recommending adjuvant chemotherapy, however, is based on data from older patient cohorts not reflecting improvements in pre-operative staging, surgery, and pathological examination. The aim is to review the current risk of recurrence in stage II and III patients and second, to estimate the relative importance of routinely assessed clinico-pathological variables. Methods. The PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled studies and observational studies published after 1 January 2005 with patients included after January 1995 on prognosis in surgically treated stage II and III CC patients. Results. Of 2596 studies identified, 37 met the inclusion criteria and 25 provided data for meta-analysis. The total patient sample size in the 25 studies reporting either disease-free (DFS) or recurrence-free survival was 15 559 in stage II and 18 425 in stage III. Five-year DFS for stage II patients operated without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy was 81.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75.4-87.4; in studies with good/very good quality of reporting 82.7%, (95% CI 80.8-84.6)]. For stage II patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the five-year DFS was 79.3% (95% CI 75.6-83.1). For stage III patients without chemotherapy, five-year DFS was 49.0% (95% CI 23.2-74.8) and for those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 63.6% (95% CI 59.3-67.9). The prognostic impact of commonly investigated clinico-pathological parameters, (pT-stage, pN-stage, differentiation, number of lymph nodes studied, MMR-status, and emergency surgery) were confirmed. Conclusions. In this meta-analysis, studies with good quality of reporting show a five-year DFS of 82.7% for stage II CC without adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas the five-year DFS is 63.8% for stage III CC with adjuvant chemotherapy. Due to insufficient reporting on treatment quality the presented DFS is likely an under-estimation of what is achieved at high-quality centers today. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gene silencing by DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands is a well-characterized phenomenon in cancer. The effect of hypomethylation in particular of non-CpG island genes is much less well described. By genome-wide screening, we identified 105 genes in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal adenocarcinomas with an inverse correlation (Spearman's ρ ≤ −0.40) between methylation and expression. Of these, 35 (33%) were hypomethylated non-CpG island genes and two of them, APOLD1 (Spearman's ρ = −0.82) and SRPX2 (Spearman's ρ = −0.80) were selected for further analyses. Hypomethylation of both genes were localized events not shared by adjacent genes. A set of 662 FFPE DNA samples not only confirmed that APOLD1 and SRPX2 are hypomethylated in CRC but also revealed hypomethylation to be significantly ( p < 0.01) associated with tumors being localized in the left side, CpG island methylator phenotype negative, MSS, BRAF wt, undifferentiated and of adenocarcinoma histosubtype. Demethylation experiments supported SRPX2 being epigenetically regulated via DNA methylation, whereas other mechanisms in addition to DNA methylation seem to be involved in the regulation of APOLD1. We further identified miR-149 as a potential novel post-transcriptional regulator of SRPX2. In carcinoma tissue, miR-149 was downregulated and inversely correlated to SRPX2 (ρ = −0.77). Furthermore, ectopic expression of miR-149 significantly reduced SRPX2 transcript levels. Our study highlights that in colorectal tumors, hypomethylation of non-CpG island-associated promoters deregulate gene expression nearly as frequent as do CpG-island hypermethylation. The hypomethylation of SRPX2 is focal and not part of a large block. Furthermore, it often translates to an increased expression level, which may be modulated by miR-149. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Robust optimization has been suggested as an approach to reduce the irradiated volume in lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). We performed a retrospective planning study to investigate the potential benefits over Planning Target Volume (PTV)-based planning., Material and Methods: Thirty-nine patients had additional plans using robust optimization with 5-mm isocenter shifts of the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) created in addition to the PTV-based plan used for treatment. The optimization included the mid-position phase and the extreme breathing phases of the 4D-CT planning scan. The plans were compared for tumor coverage, isodose volumes, and doses to Organs At Risk (OAR). Additionally, we evaluated both plans with respect to observed tumor motion using the peak tumor motion seen on the planning scan and cone-beam CTs., Results: Statistically significant reductions in irradiated isodose volumes and doses to OAR were achieved with robust optimization, while preserving tumor dose. The reductions were largest for the low-dose volumes and reductions up to 188 ccm was observed. The robust evaluation based on observed peak tumor motion showed comparable target doses between the two planning methods. Accumulated mean GTV-dose was increased by a median of 4.46 Gy and a non-significant increase of 100 Monitor Units (MU) was seen in the robust optimized plans., Interpretation: The robust plans required more time to prepare, and while it might not be a feasible planning strategy for all lung SBRT patients, we suggest it might be useful for selected patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) is a key regulator of angiogenesis that binds to the receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. It is well known that VEGF-A levels are increased in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue compared to normal colorectal tissue, but little is known regarding the expression of the VEGFR-1 and -2 receptors. The aim of the present study was to perform a quantitative analysis of VEGFR-1 and -2 at the mRNA and protein level in tumour and normal colorectal tissue from CRC patients. Tissues were collected from 110 patients who underwent surgical resection for CRC. Receptor status was analysed at the gene expression level by real time RT-PCR using β-2-microglobulin and β-actin as reference genes. Protein analysis was performed using the ELISA technique. Gene expression and protein concentrations of VEGFR-1 and -2 were significantly increased in CRC tissue compared to normal colorectal tissue (P<10-6 for both receptors). An association between the gene expression of VEGFR-2 in CRC tissue and disease stage was detected (P=0.055). Significant correlations were also found between the gene expression of VEGFR-1 and -2 in CRC tissue and normal colorectal tissue (P<10-4). The gene expression and protein concentrations of VEGFR-1 and -2 were increased in CRC tissue compared to normal colorectal tissue, indicating that both receptors are important in CRC. The clinical implications of these findings require further investigation.