Search

Objective: Disease activity both between and within patients with SLE is highly variable, yet factors driving this variability remain unclear. This study aimed to identify predictors of variability in SLE disease activity over time., Methods: We analysed data from 2930 patients with SLE across 13 countries, collected over 38 754 clinic visits between 2013 and 2020. Clinic visit records were converted to panel data with 1-year intervals. The time-adjusted mean disease activity, termed AMS , was calculated. The yearly change in [Formula: see text], denoted as [Formula: see text], was regressed onto [Formula: see text] and other potential predictors using random-effects models. Some variables were split into a person-mean component to assess between-patient differences and a demeaned component to assess within-patient variability., Results: Overall, variability in SLE disease activity exhibited stabilisation over time. A significant inverse relationship emerged between a patient's disease activity in a given year and variability in disease activity in the subsequent year: a 1-point increase in person-mean disease activity was associated with a 0.27-point decrease (95% CI -0.29 to -0.26, p<0.001) in subsequent variability. Additionally, a 1-point increase in within-patient disease activity variability was associated with a 0.56-point decrease (95% CI -0.57 to -0.55, p<0.001) in the subsequent year. Furthermore, each 1-point increase in the annual average time-adjusted mean Physician Global Assessment was associated with a 0.08-point decrease (90% CI -0.13 to -0.03, p=0.002) in disease activity variability for the following year. Prednisolone dose and the duration of activity in specific organ systems exhibited negative and positive associations, respectively, with disease activity variability in the subsequent year. Patients from less affluent countries displayed greater disease activity variability compared with those from wealthier nations., Conclusion: Disease activity tends to be less variable among patients with higher or more variable disease activity in the previous year. Within-patient variability in disease activity has a stronger impact on subsequent fluctuations than differences between individual patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: NL’s salary from Monash University was partly supported by a research grant from BMS. AH has received a research grant from AstraZeneca, consulting fees from EUSA Pharma (UK), GSK and UCB Australia and speaker fees/honoraria from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Limbic, Moose Republic and Novartis. SS has received consulting fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca and ZP Therapeutics. MN has received an investigator grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC GNT1176538), research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen, consulting fees from AstraZeneca and GSK, honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK and support for conference attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim. SO has received speaker fees/honoraria from AstraZeneca and Limbic. ZL has received consulting fees from Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis and UCB Pharma, and holds royalties with these companies. SN has received consulting and lecture/speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Biogen and Boehringer Ingelheim and is a non-paid member of Viatris (Idorsia) Advisory Board. YK has received payment/honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline KK, AstraZeneca KK, Sanofi KK, Pfizer Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. MH has received payment for postmarketing surveillance from GlaxoSmithKline KK, a research grant from Novartis Pharma, and honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline KK, AstraZeneca KK and Astellas Pharma. FG was a Director on the Board of the Australian Rheumatology Association at the time of the study. ZZ has received payment/honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca KK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen and UCB Pharma, and has participated in advisory boards for BeiGene. TT has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Kowa and Mitsubishi Tanabe. KN has received speaker fees from Novartis. YT has received speaker fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Eisai, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Taisho, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Pfizer, UCB, Asahi Kasei and Astellas, and received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Taisho and Chugai. Y-HC has received advisory board fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, BMS, Roche, Lilly, GSK, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, MSD, Guigai, Astellas, Inova Diagnostics, UCB, Agnitio Science Technology, United Biopharma, Thermo Fisher, Gilead, Eisai and CSL Behring, as well as research grants from the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan Department of Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University, GSK, Pfizer, BMS, Roche and AstraZeneca, and Medigen Vaccine Biologics. JChoi is an employee of BMS. RK-R has received grants from GSK and Novartis. EM has received consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Background: In SELECT-AXIS 2, upadacitinib improved the signs and symptoms of active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) through 52 weeks versus placebo and was well tolerated. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib through 2 years., Methods: The study enrolled eligible adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of nr-axSpA who met the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria and had objective signs of active inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints and/or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive double-blinded treatment with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) or placebo for 52 weeks, after which all patients received open-label treatment with upadacitinib 15 mg QD. Efficacy results over 104 weeks were reported as observed (AO) and either AO with non-responder imputation (AO-NRI; binary endpoints) or AO with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (continuous endpoints). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized through week 104., Results: Of 313 patients randomized and treated, 224 (continuous upadacitinib n = 117; placebo/upadacitinib n = 107) completed 104 weeks of treatment. In patients who received continuous upadacitinib, sustained improvement was observed through 2 years of treatment across efficacy endpoints including disease activity, pain, function, enthesitis, quality of life, and MRI measures of inflammation. At week 104, 57.1%, 59.0%, and 31.4% of patients achieved ASAS40 response, and low disease activity and inactive disease (as defined by Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score), respectively (AO-NRI); week 104 outcomes were generally similar in patients who initially received placebo and were switched to upadacitinib at week 52. In total, 286 patients were exposed to ≥ 1 dose of upadacitinib, comprising 378.3 patient-years (PY) of exposure. Upadacitinib was generally well tolerated, with exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) for TEAEs, serious adverse events (AEs), and AEs leading to study drug discontinuation of 207.5, 8.7, and 5.3 events/100 PY, respectively. EAERs of TEAEs of special interest were broadly consistent with those reported through week 52., Conclusions: Treatment with upadacitinib demonstrated consistent improvement and maintenance of treatment effect across efficacy endpoints through 2 years; no new safety signals were identified with additional exposure., Trial Registration: NCT04169373., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted according to the International Council for Harmonisation guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial protocol was approved by independent ethics committees and institutional review boards. Written informed consent was provided by patients ahead of study screening. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: FVdB has received speaker and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. AD has received grant/research support from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; and honoraria or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. DP has received research support from AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Biocad, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Medscape, MoonLake, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB Pharma. WPM has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medscape, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; is Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited; and has received royalties or licenses from Augurex for the 14-3-3eta diagnostic biomarker. DvdH has received consulting fees from AbbVie, ArgenX, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, and UCB Pharma; and is an editorial board member of the Journal of Rheumatology, an editorial board member of RMD Open, an associate editor for the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, an advisor for the Assessment of Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society, and the Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV. T-HK has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Kirin, Lilly, and Novartis. MK has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, Ayumi Pharma, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and UCB Pharma. XeB has received grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; speakers’ bureau fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; is an editorial board member of the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases; is the ASAS President; and is the EULAR President-elect. XiB, IL-G, I-HS, PW, KK, and AS are employees of AbbVie and may own stock or options., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in Korean patients with RA., Methods: The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the DAS28-ESR after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders., Results: This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFis) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, P = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% CI 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and bDMARDs, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFis (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events but similar rates of serious adverse events to TNFis., Conclusion: In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events compared with TNFis, while the occurrence of serious adverse events was comparable between the groups., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02602704., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To investigate the trends in immunomodulator use and pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a condition requiring medication to maintain disease activity., Methods: This descriptive study used data from the National Health Information Database in Korea from 2002 to 2018. We included 5,044 pregnancies initiated between 2005 and 2017 in 3,120 SLE patients. Annual trends in SLE therapy, drug utilisation patterns during the preconception and pregnancy periods, and pregnancy outcomes were analysed., Results: Pregnancy compatible immunosuppressant (PC-IS) and hydroxychloroquine use during the first trimester were 10.7% and 41.4%, respectively. Most SLE medications exhibited a decline in usage from the preconception period to the first trimester. A prescription rate of 0.9% for pregnancy incompatible immunosuppressants (PIC-IS) was observed during the first trimester, and the incidence of live births, stillbirths, and abortions remained consistent from 2005 to 2017., Conclusions: Insufficient usage of hydroxychloroquine and PC-IS, along with a reduction in PIC-IS usage primarily during early pregnancy rather than before conception, highlights the unmet need for preconceptional family planning with appropriate medication management strategies in SLE pregnancies., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of mitochondrial transplantation as a therapeutic intervention for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). This study used a comprehensive approach, incorporating both in vitro and in vivo IIM models, and conducted a first-in-human clinical trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of mitochondria isolated from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (PN-101)., Methods: Mitochondria isolated from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells were designated as PN-101. The efficacy of PN-101 was assessed using myoblasts derived from patients with IIM and C2C12 mouse perforin/granzyme B-treated myoblasts as an in vitro IIM model. PN-101's effect on IIM was examined using C protein-induced myositis (CIM) mice as an in vivo model. The efficacy and safety of PN-101 were evaluated in a phase 1/2a clinical trial involving 9 adult patients with refractory polymyositis or dermatomyositis., Results: The myoblasts derived from patients with IIM exhibited defects in mitochondrial function and myogenesis. PN-101 transplantation enhances muscle differentiation and mitochondrial function in IIM myoblasts. PN-101 also enhanced intracellular adenosine triphosphate content, cell viability, and myogenesis in C2C12 perforin/granzyme B-treated myoblasts. In an in vivo model, PN-101 reduced myositis severity by exhibiting anti-inflammatory effects and restoring the CIM-induced metabolic shift. In a phase 1/2a prospective clinical trial involving adult patients with refractory IIM, PN-101 demonstrated no severe adverse drug reactions and showed at least minimal improvement in the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS)-Total Improvement Scores (TISs) compared with baseline., Conclusions: PN-101 transplantation could serve as a novel treatment for IIM by enhancing mitochondrial repair and reducing inflammation in muscle tissues., Competing Interests: Competing interests All authors declare they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between the genetic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the loss of tolerance to self-nuclear antigens in the preclinical stage., Methods: We analysed genetic data from 349 Korean individuals who tested positive for autoantibodies in the preclinical stage, along with 33,596 healthy controls and 2057 patients with SLE. Genome-wide and pathway-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs) of SLE were calculated based on 180 known non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) SLE loci, HLA-DRB1 classical alleles, and predefined immune-related pathways to subsequently correlate with clinical phenotypes, particularly the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) at various titre thresholds., Results: Individuals with preclinical autoimmune conditions exhibited significantly higher SLE PRSs than healthy controls (P = 2.99 × 10 -5 ), with a significantly upward trend between ANA titres and PRS (P = 1.12 × 10 -3 ). Stratification analysis revealed that preclinical-stage individuals with PRSs exceeding the means of age- and sex-matched PRSs among patients with SLE were at a significantly higher risk of ANA development (odds ratio = 2.25; P = 8.12 × 10 -3 at a dilution factor of 1:80). Pathway-specific PRS analysis identified the significant enrichment of SLE-risk effects in nine pathways, such as signalling related to reactive oxygen species production, T cell receptor, B cell receptor, and cytokines, in ANA-positive preclinical individuals (P adjusted < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our findings illustrate that the genetic burden of SLE may lead to a crucial transition from normal to preclinical autoimmune conditions prior to the pathogenic stage by increasing the susceptibility to and levels of ANAs., Competing Interests: Competing interests All authors declare they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2025 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the incidence and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) comparing them to diabetes patients and the general population. This nationwide cohort study focused on incident SLE patients aged over 40 years, matched with diabetes patients and the general population (1:4:4 ratio). CVD was defined as ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, and cardiac arrest. Incidence rate and incidence rate ratio (IRR) of CVD were calculated using generalised estimating equation models. The Fine-Gray model assessed risk factors for CVD in both SLE and diabetes patients. The study included 4272 incident SLE patients, 17,003 diabetes patients, and 17,088 from the general population. SLE patients had higher CVD risk compared to the general population, with adjusted IRRs of 1.99 for overall CVD. Diabetes patients showed increased CVD risk, but to a lesser extent, with an IRR of 1.39. SLE patients aged 40-59 years displayed a significantly elevated CVD risk. Advanced age, male gender, and current use of glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive, and anti-platelet agents were associated with increased CVD risk in SLE patients. SLE patients have a higher risk of CVD compared to the general population, more so than diabetes patients., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval and Consent to Participate: The data used in this study were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database, which does not contain information that can directly identify individuals or link subjects through identifiers. Consequently, the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Hanyang University Hospital (IRB file No. HYUH 2020–05-041) granted an exemption from review. The requirement for informed consent was also waived by the Hanyang University Hospital IRB due to the use of de-identified data. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Background: To investigate cancer incidence and the potential influence of immunosuppressive agents in Korean systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing data from the Korea Healthcare Bigdata Linked Platform, which integrated the National Central Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Service databases covering the period 2008-2017. Incidence rates (IRs) per 10,000 person-years (PYs) for site-specific cancers of SLE patients were calculated using ICD-O-3 codes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to assess the association between immunosuppressive agents and cancer development in SLE patients., Results: A total of 10,013 predominantly female (91%) Korean SLE patients with a mean age of 36.9 ± 15.2 years were included. During a follow-up of 62,268.5 PYs, 368 patients developed cancer. The IRs per 10,000 PYs for total, solid, and hematologic cancers were 59.07, 54.09, and 5.78, respectively. The most prevalent cancers (measured in IRs per 10,000 PYs) were thyroid (17.01, 95% CI 13.78-20.25), breast (8.67, 95% CI 6.36-10.98), stomach (4.49, 95% CI 2.83-6.16), colorectal (4.17, 95% CI 2.57-5.78), and cervical (3.85, 95% CI 2.31-5.39). Approximately half (50.8%) of SLE patients with cancer were diagnosed at the localized Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) stage. No statistically significant association was found between immunosuppressive agents and cancer development (Odds Ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.80-1.34)., Conclusion: Our study shows that Korean SLE patients using immunosuppressive agents are not significantly more likely to develop cancer. Further research with extended observation is warranted to corroborate these findings., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The databases extracted from NHID could not be identified directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. Therefore, our study was exempted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Hanyang University Hospital (IRB file NO. HYUH 2020–05-041). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of organ damage (damage) and flare and to examine longitudinal associations between flares and subsequent damage accrual, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: Patients enrolled in the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration cohort with ≥3 years of prospectively captured data were studied. Flares were assessed at routine visits, while damage ((Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology) Damage Index) was assessed annually. Multivariable, multifailure survival analyses were carried out to quantify the association between flares and damage accrual., Results: 1556 patients with SLE with a median (IQR) of 5.7 (3.9, 7.0) years of follow-up were studied. 39.5% (n=614) of patients had damage at enrolment, and 31.9% (n=496) accrued damage during the study observation period. The incidence of damage accrual during observation was ~58/1000 person-years. Overall, 74.1% (n=1153) of patients experienced a flare of any severity (mild/moderate or severe) at least once; 56.9% (n=885) experienced recurrent (≥2) flares. The risk of subsequent damage accrual in patients who experienced mild-to-moderate flare, after controlling for confounders, was 32% greater than in patients without flares (adjusted HR) (95% CI 1.32 (1.17 to 1.72)). The risk of damage accrual was greater if patients had severe flares (HR (95% CI) 1.58 (1.18 to 2.11)). For each additional flare, the risk of damage accrual increased by 7% (HR (95% CI) 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13))., Conclusions: Flares independently increased the risk of damage accrual. Prevention of flares should be considered a necessary goal of SLE disease management to minimise permanent damage., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RK-R has received grants from GSK and Novartis. AH has received a research grant from AstraZeneca, consulting fees from EUSA Pharma (UK), GSK and UCB Australia, and speaker fees/honoraria from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Limbic, Moose Republic and Novartis. ZL has received consulting fees and royalties from Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB Pharma. SN has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim and Idorsia, and payment for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Roche. MH has received institutional research grants from GSK K.K. and Novartis, and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca K.K. and Astellas Pharma. YK has received payment/honoraria from Asahi Kasei Pharma, AstraZeneca K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, GSK K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Pfizer Japan Inc. and Sanofi K.K. ZZ has received payment/honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB Pharma, and has participated in advisory boards for Beigene Ltd. FG was a Director on the Board of the Australian Rheumatology Association at the time of the study. MN has received an Investigator Grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC GNT1176538), research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen, consulting fees from AstraZeneca and GSK; honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and GSK, and support for conference attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim. EM has received consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, and EMD Serono Research in context. DM, XX and AANR are employed by GSK and hold financial equities in GSK. WL, VG, JC, AL, SFL, Y-JJW, LH, SS, LZ, MC, YH, SO’N, SO, S-CB and CSL have nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Background: This study aimed to identify key priorities for the development of guidelines for information and communication technology (ICT)-based patient education tailored to the needs of patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) in the Republic of Korea, based on expert consensus., Methods: A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted with 20 rheumatology, patient education, and digital health literacy experts. A total of 35 items covering 7 domains and 18 subdomains were evaluated. Each item was evaluated for its level of importance, and the responses were rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus levels were defined as "high" (interquartile range [IQR] ≤ 1, agreement ≥ 80%, content validity ratio [CVR] ≥ 0.7), "Moderate" (IQR ≥ 1, agreement 50-79%, CVR 0.5-0.7), and "Low" (IQR > 1, agreement < 50%, CVR < 0.5)., Results: Strong consensus was reached for key priorities for developing guidelines in areas such as health literacy, digital health literacy, medical terminology, user interface, and user experience design for mobile apps. Chatbot use and video (e.g., YouTube) also achieved high consensus, whereas AI-powered platforms such as ChatGPT showed moderate-to-high agreement. Telemedicine was excluded because of insufficient consensus., Conclusion: The key priorities identified in this study provide a foundation for the development of ICT-based patient education guidelines for RDs in the Republic of Korea. Future efforts should focus on integrating digital tools into clinical practice to enhance patient engagement and improve clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2025 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) follows a treat-to-target approach, as recommended by guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). RA treatment recommendations include an emphasis on frequent disease activity assessments to optimize therapy, recognizing the possibility of timely therapies to slow progression and improve long-term results. The evaluation of joint inflammation, pain, physical function, and clinical indicators is required for comprehensive RA therapy. Current therapeutic goals include achieving low disease activity or remission to enhance the quality of life (QoL) for patients. ACR-endorsed RA disease activity measures, such as the Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein level, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Activity Scale-II, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, are recommended for their precision and sensitivity in supporting treat-to-target strategies. The ACR and EULAR have implemented Boolean-based and index-based remission criteria (SDAI and CDAI, respectively) to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness. The use of these markers regularly aligns with the ACR guidelines, improving adherence to quality indicators in clinical practice and confirming the provision of high-quality RA therapy. This review examines disease activity, function, and QoL measurements in line with the ACR and EULAR guidelines to aid doctors in treating Korean patients with RA., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST Y.H.L. has been an editorial board member since March 2010 but has no role in the decision to publish this article. J.B.J. was the director of publications in May 2014 to May 2018, and will be an associate editor and chairman since 2023. Two but has no role in the decision to publish this article., (Copyright © 2025 by The Korean College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To estimate the direct healthcare cost progression from before to after systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis and to compare healthcare costs by disease severity., Methods: Patients with incident SLE diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 were identified from the Korean National Health Insurance database. Annual direct healthcare costs for 5 years before and after SLE were estimated and compared with those of age-, sex- and calendar month-matched (1:4) controls, without SLE. Direct healthcare costs were compared by disease severity of SLE using regression analysis., Results: Among 11 173 patients with SLE and 45 500 subjects without SLE, annual direct healthcare costs per person increased in the year before SLE diagnosis and peaked in the first year after diagnosis. They were 7.7-fold greater in the SLE patients than in the subjects without SLE ($5871 vs $759). Severe SLE was associated with 3.284-fold (95% CI: 3.075, 3.507) higher annual costs than mild SLE during the year after diagnosis. Older age (age 60-79 years), lupus nephritis, interstitial lung diseases, and comorbidities such as avascular necrosis and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher annual direct healthcare costs (times [95% CI]) in the first year after diagnosis: age 60-69: 1.119 (1.034, 1.211); age 70-79: 1.470 (1.342, 1.611); lupus nephritis: 1.794 (1.711, 1.881); interstitial lung diseases: 1.435 (1.258, 1.638); avascular necrosis: 6.208 (4.541, 8.487); and chronic kidney disease: 1.858 (1.673, 2.064)., Conclusion: Patients with SLE incurred significantly higher direct healthcare costs than subjects without SLE during the first year after diagnosis. Disease severity, older age, major organ involvements and comorbidities were associated with increased healthcare costs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The APLAR has published a set of recommendations on the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2021. The current consensus paper supplements and updates specifically the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) according to two rounds of Delphi exercise from members of the APLAR SLE special interest group, invited nephrologists, histopathologists, and lupus nephritis patients. For initial treatment of LN, we recommend a combination of glucocorticoids (GCs) with cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) as first-line options. An upfront combination of immunosuppressive drugs and the biological agents may be considered in patients at significant risk of disease progression and renal function deterioration. Switching or "add-on" among different immunosuppressive agents, including biological agents, may be considered for refractory disease. Subsequent/maintenance therapy of LN should continue for at least 3 years to reduce the risk of renal flares. Lower dose MMF and azathioprine are options, but MMF maintenance should follow induction by the same drug. Prednisolone or equivalent should be maintained at a dose of 5 mg/day or less. The APLAR consensus for the management of LN includes recommendations for adjunctive therapies, monitoring and treatment of LN-related co-morbidities, and renal replacement therapies. It is hoped that this consensus paper can provide an evidence-based and pragmatic approach to the management of LN, taking into account the evidence level of therapies in Asian patients, cost-effectiveness, and differences in health care resources and reimbursement policies in the Asia-Pacific region., (© 2025 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST This is the content of the oral presentation given by the president of the Korean College of Rheumatology, Jae-Bum Jun, M.D., Ph.D., during the presidential plenary session at the 44th Korean College of Rheumatology and 18th International Symposium (KCR, 2024), held from May 16 to 18, 2024. Jae-Bum Jun has been an editorial board member since June 2014, but has no role in the decision to publish this article.

Limited knowledge exists regarding biomarkers that predict treatment response in Lupus nephritis (LN). We aimed to identify potential molecular biomarkers to predict treatment response in patients with LN. We enrolled 66 patients with active LN who underwent renal biopsy upon enrollment. Serum and urine samples were collected longitudinally, and we measured 12 biomarkers in each sample using a multiplex immunofluorescence assay. These biomarkers included monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 16 (IL-16), interleukin 17 (IL-17), interleukin 23 (IL-23), tumor necrosis factor receptor II (TNF-RII), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP 4), vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Patients were categorized into two groups based on their 1-year treatment response to Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based therapy: 50 responders and 16 non-responders. Only urine IL-17 (uIL-17) showed baseline level differences between the two groups, with higher in responders. In ROC curve analyses assessing the predictive performance of biomarkers, baseline uIL-17 and changes in uIL-6 and uIL-23 levels at 3 months could predict the 1-year treatment response, showing AUC values of 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.87), 0.70 (0.54-0.86), and 0.71 (0.57-0.85), respectively. Combining uIL-6 and uIL-23 into a model improved predictability, achieving an AUC of 0.75 (0.61-0.90). Baseline uIL-17 levels and early changes in uIL-6 and uIL-23 could serve as potential biomarkers to predict 1-year treatment response in lupus nephritis patients receiving MMF-based therapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Human samples were collected in accordance with approved guidelines set by the human ethics committee (Hanyang University Medical Center, Approval Number: HYUH2017-08-035). Informed consent was obtained from all participants before participation. This study adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to participate: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease with an unclear etiology and no effective treatments. Recent research has suggested involvement of the microbiome in SSc pathogenesis. This study aimed to identify specific microbial species associated with SSc and explore their therapeutic potential. Serum Abs against 384 intestinal microbial species revealed a significant depletion in Abs against Bifidobacterium longum in patients with SSc compared to healthy controls. In a bleomycin-induced SSc mouse model, oral administration of B. longum strain RAPO attenuated skin and lung fibrosis, accompanied by reduced infiltration of inflammatory monocytes/macrophages and downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemoattractant Ccl2 genes in lymph nodes and fibrotic tissues. B. longum RAPO treatment restored fecal microbial diversity and augmented short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria in the gut, leading to increased fecal butyrate levels and upregulated SCFA receptor Gpr41 in the mesenteric lymph node. In vitro , B. longum RAPO and its culture supernatant suppressed the expressions of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes in macrophages and inhibited myofibroblast differentiation in fibroblasts. These findings highlight the probiotic potential of B. longum RAPO in preventing tissue fibrosis by modulating macrophage activity and promoting the growth of SCFA-producing bacteria, underscoring the therapeutic potential of microbial modulation in SSc., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. The Korean Association of Immunologists.)

Objective: High disease activity status (HDAS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with adverse long-term outcomes. We examined the frequency of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and remission (REM) attainment in HDAS patients and whether their attainment was associated with improved patient outcomes., Methods: Demographic, clinical and outcomes data, collected prospectively from a multinational cohort between 2013 and 2020, were analysed. Disease activity was assessed using SLEDAI-2K. HDAS was defined as SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10. Patients' first visit with SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10 was assigned as baseline. Survival analyses were performed to examine the associations between cumulative and sustained LLDAS and REM attainment in HDAS patients and subsequent organ damage accrual and flare., Results: 1,029 HDAS patients with a median study duration of 2.7 years [IQR: 1.0, 4.8] were studied. LLDAS and REM were attained at least once by 71% (LLDAS-ever, n = 726) and 41% (REM-ever, n = 418) of patients. Approximately one-fifth of patients attained ≥50% cumulative time in LLDAS or REM. 37% (n = 385) of patients attained ≥3months of sustained LLDAS, with progressively lower proportions of patients attaining longer periods of sustained LLDAS. Lower proportions of patients attained sustained REM. Attainment of cumulative and sustained LLDAS or REM provided significant protection against damage accrual and flare in HDAS patients. Sustained periods of LLDAS and REM were difficult to achieve and therefore a more stringent target, but provided the most protection against damage accrual or flare., Conclusion: LLDAS and REM were achievable targets in HDAS patients, and provided significant protection against adverse outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objective: This review aimed to map the existing the information and communication technology (ICT)-based patient education for autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and identify key effectiveness factors and guidelines for professionals., Methods: A scoping review systematically reviewed PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE and Web of Science. We designed search strategies to identify ICT-based patient education for autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases focused on rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, published between January 2011 and October 2023. Data extraction was independently screened by two reviewers according to the eligibility criteria., Results: Of 13,861 records, 18 met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were randomized controlled trials, primarily conducted in the USA, focusing on rheumatoid arthritis. ICT-based interventions included web-based platforms, aiming to improve self-management, medication adherence, with most interventions showing significant improvements. Digital tools such as websites, chatbots were common. Five groups representing the ICT functions were identified: digital self-management tools, multimedia learning materials, personalized educational sessions, behavior change and empathy games, and interactive online communities and peer support. Most studies lacked theoretical frameworks, or guidelines for developing patient education., Conclusion: ICT-based patient education has significant potential for enhancing self-management and behavior changes in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Yoon-Kyoung Sung reports financial support was provided by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Complement Factor H-Related protein 5 (CFHR5) belongs to the factor H/CFHR family and regulates the complement system by modulating factor H's inhibitory activity against C3b. Despite its known role, the impact of CFHR5 on autoimmune arthritis and its relationship to pathophysiological changes in arthritis and bone loss remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the effect of CFHR5 on aggressive osteoclast activity and arthritis using a murine model of collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA)., Methods: The effect of recombinant CFHR5 protein (rCFHR5) on arthritis were evaluated in CAIA. The mice were divided into three group and intraperitoneally treated with rCFHR5, methotrexate (MTX) as positive control or PBS as negative control. In the CAIA mouse model, the rCFHR5-treated group significantly reduced the incidence and clinical arthritis equivalent to the MTX group. Clinical arthritis scores, incidence and body weight were measured, and histological analysis of ankle joints was performed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and Safranin O - Fast green (SOFG), Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and Immunohistochemistry. Moreover, to investigate the rCFHR5 role, we isolated murine osteoclast precursor cells (OCPs) from each group, induced osteoclasts with M-CSF and RANKL, and performed TRAP and F-actin staining. To verify the mechanism, mRNA and protein analyses were performed in OCPs., Results: Histological examination of ankle joints revealed substantial reductions in synovial hyperplasia, bone marrow inflammation, bone erosion, cartilage destruction and TRAP-positive cells in the rCFHR5 group compared to the vehicle group. The ankle joints of the rCFHR5 group showed markedly decreased expression of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6). Mechanically, treatment with rCFHR5 inhibited RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation from OCPs and disrupted the RANK-JNK signaling. These findings demonstrate that treatment with rCFHR5 attenuates joint inflammation and reduces osteoclast differentiation, indicating its potential anti-inflammatory effect in autoimmune arthritis models., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterised by variability of disease activity patterns over time. This study aimed to investigate the trajectories of SLE disease severity patterns, identify clinical and demographic variables, and assess the association between trajectories of SLE disease severity and all-cause mortality., Methods: A retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed patients with SLE was established using the Korean nationwide healthcare claims information database between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2016. Using group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM), they were clustered based on the trajectory of SLE disease severity patterns during a two-year follow-up from the cohort entry date. We performed Cox proportional hazards models to compare the mortality between trajectories of SLE disease severity patterns., Results: A total of 8901 patients with SLE were included in the analysis from 2008 to 2016. Five distinct SLE disease severity trajectories were identified as optimal: consistently severe (4.6 %), mild-then-moderate (11.6 %), moderate-then-mild (15.1 %), consistently moderate (30.4 %), and consistently mild (38.3 %). Patients with consistently mild disease severity were more likely to be older; those with consistently severe disease severity were more likely to be male with more comorbidities than other groups. Compared to the consistently mild disease severity, the other trajectory groups showed a higher risk of all-cause mortality., Conclusion: Through GBTM, dynamic two-year severity trajectories of newly diagnosed SLE were identified. Patients' demographics and comorbidities attributed to changes in SLE severity trajectories, which may inform evidence for clinical decision-making., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Effective management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) necessitates the accurate measurement of disease activity using a treat-to-target strategy established as a cornerstone approach. Disease activity assessment tools such as the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 have been internationally validated and recognised. In Korea, the government initiated a quality assessment program mandating routine measurement of DAS28 to ensure high-quality RA management. However, whether the DAS28 is the most suitable disease activity measurement tool in the Korean clinical environment is a topic worth considering. In this review, we comprehensively examined disease activity measurement tools and their performance in the Korean context. We also propose a new strategy for measuring RA disease activity, tailored to the different situations encountered by physicians in routine clinical practice. This review may contribute to the improvement of the quality of care for patients with RA in Korea., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST S.K.C. has been an editorial board member of the Journal of Rheumatic Diseases since June 2020, but has no role in the decision to publish this article., (Copyright © 2024 by The Korean College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.)

The prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) varies significantly based on ethnicity rather than geographic distribution; thus, the prevalence is higher in Asian, Hispanic, and Black African populations than in European populations. The risk of developing lupus nephritis (LN) is the highest among Asian populations. Therefore, we hypothesize that human genetic diversity between races has occurred through the early human migration and human genetic adaptation to various environments, with a particular focus on pathogens. Additionally, we compile the currently available evidence on the ethnic gene diversity of SLE and how it relates to disease severity. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus is well established as associated with susceptibility to SLE; specific allele distributions have been observed across diverse populations. Notably, specific amino acid residues within these HLA loci demonstrate significant associations with SLE risk. The non-HLA genetic loci associated with SLE risk also varies across diverse ancestries, implicating distinct immunological pathways, such as the type-I interferon and janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathways in Asians, the type-II interferon signaling pathway in Europeans, and B cell activation pathway in Africans. Furthermore, assessing individual genetic susceptibility using genetic risk scores (GRS) for SLE helps to reveal the diverse prevalence, age of onset, and clinical phenotypes across different ethnicities. A higher GRS increases the risk of LN and the severity of SLE. Therefore, understanding ethnic gene diversity is crucial for elucidating disease mechanisms and SLE severity, which could enable the development of novel drugs specific to each race., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2024 by The Korean College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.)

Inflammatory myopathies, such as polymyositis and dermatomyositis, are systemic inflammatory disorders that affect skeletal muscles and internal organs. The treatment of inflammatory myopathies usually involves long-term use of high doses of steroids and/or immunosuppressants, making patients susceptible to opportunistic infections. Unfortunately, infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with inflammatory myopathies. Musculoskeletal nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are rare. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are easily overlooked owing to their rarity, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment, indolent clinical course, and difficulty isolating the pathogen. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are a growing health concern because of their increasing incidence and the need for prolonged treatment. In patients with connective tissue diseases, immunosuppressant use may lead to an increased risk of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection with a poor prognosis, which highlights the need for early diagnosis and treatment. Herein, we report the case of a 59-year-old man diagnosed with dermatomyositis, who had prolonged use of immunosuppressants and developed a disseminated soft tissue infection in both thighs caused by Mycobacterium abscessus. Multimodal images were obtained using magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. A strong suspicion of possible combined opportunistic infections and appropriate staining is essential in diagnosing nontuberculous mycobacterial myositis., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS).)

Objectives: This study aims to determine the independent impact of definitions of remission/low disease activity (LDA) on direct/indirect costs (DCs, ICs) in a multicentre inception cohort., Methods: Patients from 31 centres in 10 countries were enrolled within 15 months of diagnosis and assessed annually. Five mutually exclusive disease activity states (DAS) were defined as (1) remission off-treatment: clinical (c) SLEDAI-2K=0, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (2) remission on-treatment: cSLEDAI-2K=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; (3) LDA-Toronto Cohort (TC): cSLEDAI-2K≤2, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (4) modified lupus LDA state (mLLDAS): SLEDAI-2K≤4, no activity in major organs/systems, no new activity, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants and (5) active: all remaining assessments.At each assessment, patients were stratified into the most stringent DAS fulfilled and the proportion of time in a DAS since cohort entry was determined. Annual DCs/ICs (2021 Canadian dollars) were based on healthcare use and lost workforce/non-workforce productivity over the preceding year.The association between the proportion of time in a DAS and annual DC/IC was examined through multivariable random-effects linear regressions., Results: 1692 patients were followed a mean of 9.7 years; 49.0% of assessments were active. Remission/LDA (per 25% increase in time in a remission/LDA state vs active) were associated with lower annual DC/IC: remission off-treatment (DC -$C1372; IC -$C2507), remission on-treatment (DC -$C973; IC -$C2604,) LDA-TC (DC -$C1158) and mLLDAS (DC -$C1040). There were no cost differences between remission/LDA states., Conclusions: Our data suggest that systemic lupus erythematosus patients who achieve remission, both off and on-therapy, and reductions in disease activity incur lower costs than those experiencing persistent disease activity., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MRWB has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Sanofi Genzyme. MFU-G has received consulting and/or speaking fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Ferrer and a research grant from Janssen. CG has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Amgen, Sanofi, and UCB (less than $10 000 each). DJW has received consulting fees from Merck, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Lilly and Glenmark (less than $10 000 each). PRF has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10 000 each). DDG received consulting fees and/or honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca (less than $10 000). INB has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Eli Lilly, UCB, Roche, Merck Serono, MedImmune (less than $10 000 each) and grants from UCB, Genzyme Sanofi, and GlaxoSmithKline. EMG has paid consultation with investment analysts Guidepoint Global Gerson Lerman Group. RR-G has received consulting fees from Cabaletta, BristolMyersSquibb, Biogen, Merck, and Ampel Solutions (all less than $10 000 each). RFvV has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB (less than $10 000 each) and research support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and UCB. MI has received consulting fees from UCB and Amgen (less than $10 000 each). KK has received grants from UCB, Human Genome Sciences/GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and has received consulting fees from Exagen Diagnostics, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Anthera (less than $10 000 each). AEC has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche and Otsuka (less than $10 000 each) and a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline. No other disclosures relevant to this article were reported., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Objectives: The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) allows for certain clinical and/or serological activity of SLE, provided overall disease activity does not exceed predefined cut-offs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who achieved LLDAS with clinical activity, serological activity only or neither clinical nor serological activity., Methods: Patients with SLE enrolled in a prospective multinational cohort from March 2013 to December 2020 who were in LLDAS at least once were included. Visits that fulfilled both LLDAS and Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria were excluded., Results: 2099 patients were included, with median follow-up of 3.5 (IQR 1.3-5.8) years. At 6150 visits, patients were in LLDAS but not DORIS criteria; of these 1280 (20.8%) had some clinical activity, 3102 (50.4%) visits had serological activity only and 1768 (28.8%) visits had neither clinical nor serological activity. Multivariable regression analysis showed that compared with non-LLDAS, all three subsets of LLDAS had a protective association with flares in the ensuing 6 months and damage accrual in the ensuing 36 months. LLDAS with no clinical or serological activity had a significantly stronger protective association with severe flares in the ensuing 6 months compared with LLDAS with clinical activity (HR 0.47, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.82), p=0.007)., Conclusions: LLDAS without any clinical activity accounted for almost 80% of LLDAS visits. This study confirms that all subsets of LLDAS are associated with reduced flare and damage accrual. However, LLDAS without any clinical or serological activity has the strongest protective association with severe flares., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SO'N received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim; lecture/speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer and GSK and research grants from Aurania, Biogen, Idorsia, Novartis. ZL received consulting fees from Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, UCB and have royalties with Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, UCB. SS received consulting fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ZP Therapeutics. YK received payment/Honoria from Asahi Kasei, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Pfizer Japan and Sanofi. MH received speaker’s fee from AbbVie Japan, Ayumi, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Takeda and Teijin; consultant fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kissei Pharmaceutical and Teijin and research grants from AbbVie Japan GK, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Ayumi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo. Eisai, KisseiPharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, Sekisui Medical, Shionogi, Taisho, Takeda and Teijin. TT received grants from Astellas, Asahi Kasei, Chugai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and consulting fees from Astellas, Chugai. KN received Advisory Board participation fees from AbbVie. YT has received research grants from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Gilead, Chugai, Behringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Eisai, Taisho, Bristol-Myers, Pfizer and Taiho. AH received research grants from AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from EUSA Pharma (UK), and Speaker/Honoraria from Limbic, Novartis, Moose Republic, AbbVie, Eli Lilly. RK-R received research grants from Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline. EM received research grants and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Servier, EMD Serono, Takeda and UCB. MN received research grants and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline and Janssen., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This study assessed the therapeutic potential of swimming exercise in the curdlan-injected SKG mouse model and investigated the modulatory effects of irisin on inflammation. Curdlan-injected SKG were randomly assigned to either a home-cage group or a swimming group for 6 weeks. Changes in clinical arthritis scores and ankle thickness were measured weekly. Post-swimming program, mice were anesthetized for collection of vastus lateralis muscle and blood, which was followed by histological analysis, micro-CT imaging of the ankle joints, and the measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines and irisin levels. Additionally, curdlan-injected SKG mice were intravenously injected with recombinant irisin protein and observed. Finally, serum levels of irisin in healthy control and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patient groups were measured by ELISA. The swimming group of curdlan-injected SKG mice exhibited significant improvements in arthritis and enthesitis compared to the home-cage group. In particular, micro-CT and histological analyses revealed a notable reduction in pathological bone features in the swimming group compared to the home-cage group. Muscle endurance was also enhanced in the swimming group compared to the home-cage group, as determined by the wire-hanging test. Intriguingly, irisin levels not only were statistically increased in the swimming group but, also, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels were decreased. Additionally, injection of irisin protein slightly attenuated both arthritis and enthesitis in curdlan-injected SKG mice. Meanwhile, irisin serum levels were declined in AS patients. Overall, we found that swimming exercise attenuated pathological bone features in an AS animal model, potentially mediated by increased irisin serum levels with associated anti-inflammatory effects., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Object: To investigate the factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of long-term anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS)., Methods: AS patients who initiated first-line anti-TNF treatment between 2004 and 2018 and continued treatment for at least two years were enrolled in the study. Enrolled patients were observed until the last visit, discontinuation of treatment, or September 2022. Reasons for discontinuation of the first-line anti-TNF agent were categorized into the following: (1) clinical remission, (2) loss of efficacy, (3) adverse events, and (4) other reasons including loss to follow-up, cost, or reimbursement issues. A cumulative incidence function curve was used to visualize the cumulative failure rates over time for each specific reason. Univariable and multivariable cause-specific hazard models were utilized to identify factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of the first-line anti-TNF agent., Results: A total of 429 AS patients was included in the study, with 121 treated with adalimumab (ADA), 176 with etanercept (ETN), 89 with infliximab (INF), and 43 with golimumab (GLM). The median overall survival on the first-line anti-TNF agent was 10.6 (7.9-14.5) years. Among the patients, 103 (24.0%) discontinued treatment, with 36 (34.9%) due to inefficacy, 31 (30.1%) due to clinical remission, 15 (14.6%) due to adverse events, and 21 (20.4%) due to other reasons. Patients treated with ETN had a lower risk of discontinuation due to clinical remission compared to those receiving ADA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [0.21-0.99], P = 0.048). Higher baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; HR 1.31 [1.04-1.65], P = 0.023) and INF use were linked to a higher risk of treatment discontinuation for inefficacy compared to ADA use (HR 4.53 [1.45-14.16], P = 0.009). Older age was related to an increased risk of discontinuation due to infection-related adverse events (HR 1.07 [1.02-1.12], P = 0.005), and current smoking was a risk factor for discontinuation due to other reasons (HR 6.22 [1.82-21.28], P = 0.004)., Conclusion: AS patients on their first anti-TNF treatment for at least two years demonstrated a favorable long-term treatment retention rate, with a 24.0% discontinuation rate over a 10.6-year overall survival period. The predictors for discontinuation varied by causes, underscoring the complexity of treatment response and the importance of personalized approaches to treatment management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To assess whether Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) attainment is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with recent onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: Data from a 13-country longitudinal SLE cohort were collected prospectively between 2013 and 2020. An inception cohort was defined based on disease duration < 1 year at enrollment. Patient characteristics between inception and noninception cohorts were compared. Survival analyses were performed to examine the association between LLDAS attainment and damage accrual and flare., Results: Of the total 4106 patients, 680 (16.6%) were recruited within 1 year of SLE diagnosis (inception cohort). Compared to the noninception cohort, inception cohort patients were significantly younger, had higher disease activity, and used more glucocorticoids, but had less organ damage at enrollment. Significantly fewer inception cohort patients were in LLDAS at enrollment than the noninception cohort (29.6% vs 52.3%, P < 0.001), but three-quarters of both groups achieved LLDAS at least once during follow-up. Limiting analysis only to patients not in LLDAS at enrollment, inception cohort patients were 60% more likely to attain LLDAS (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61, P < 0.001) than noninception cohort patients and attained LLDAS significantly faster. LLDAS attainment was significantly protective against flare in both the inception and noninception cohorts. A total of 88 (13.6%) inception cohort patients accrued organ damage during a median 2.2 years of follow-up., Conclusion: LLDAS attainment is protective from flare in recent onset SLE. Significant protection from damage accrual was not observed because of low rates of damage accrual in the first years after SLE diagnosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03138941)., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Upadacitinib improved the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) versus placebo over 14 weeks in the primary analysis of the SELECT-AXIS 2 nr-axSpA study. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib through 1 year in patients with nr-axSpA in SELECT-AXIS 2., Methods: Patients aged at least 18 years diagnosed with nr-axSpA who fulfilled the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria and were receiving stable background therapy were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo for the 52-week double-blind period. Efficacy was assessed using non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI-MI) and as-observed analyses for binary endpoints, and mixed-effects model repeated measures for continuous endpoints., Results: Of 314 randomized patients, 259 (upadacitinib, n = 129; placebo, n = 130) completed 52 weeks of treatment. More patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo achieved ≥40% improvement in ASAS at week 52 (63% vs 43%, NRI-MI; nominal P < 0.001). Similar treatment effects were observed for the achievement of axSpA Disease Activity Score inactive disease (33% v 11%, NRI-MI; nominal P < 0.001). Overall, patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo showed greater improvement in disease activity, inflammation, pain, function, enthesitis, and quality of life through 52 weeks. Adverse events were generally comparable between the treatment groups. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, inflammatory bowel disease, or deaths were reported in those receiving upadacitinib., Conclusion: Treatment with upadacitinib showed sustained efficacy versus placebo with no new safety findings identified through 1 year. These results support the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib treatment for nr-axSpA., (© 2024 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: Validation of protective associations of the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) against flare, irreversible damage, health-related quality of life, and mortality has enabled the adoption of treat-to-target strategies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Previous validation studies were of short duration, limiting the ability to detect longer term signals in flare rate and irreversible damage. In addition, previous studies have focused on percent time at target, rather than actual periods of time that are more useful in clinical practice and trials. We assessed long-term protective associations of LLDAS and remission, and specifically examined protective thresholds of sustained LLDAS and remission., Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older with SLE were followed up from May 1, 2013, to Dec 31, 2020 in a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study. Patients were recruited from 25 centres in 12 countries. Multi-failure time-to-event analyses were used to assess the effect of sustained LLDAS on irreversible damage accrual (primary outcome; measured with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index) and flare (key secondary outcome; measured with the SELENA Flare Index), with dose exposure and threshold effects studied. Sustained LLDAS or remission were defined as two or more consecutive visits over at least 3 months in the respective state. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03138941., Findings: 3449 patients were followed up for a median of 2·8 years (IQR 1·1-5·6), totalling 37 662 visits. 3180 (92·2%) patients were women, and 3031 (87·9%) were of Asian ethnicity. 2506 (72·7%) patients had sustained LLDAS at least once. Any duration of sustained LLDAS or remission longer than 3 months was associated with reduced damage accrual (LLDAS: hazard ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·51-0·71], p<0·0001; remission: 0·66 [0·57-0·76], p<0·0001) and flare (LLDAS: 0·56 [0·51-0·63], p<0·0001; remission: 0·66 [0·60-0·73], p<0·0001), and increasing durations of sustained LLDAS corresponded to increased protective associations. Sustained DORIS remission or steroid-free remission were less attainable than LLDAS., Interpretation: We observed significant protective associations of LLDAS and remission against damage accrual and flare, establish a threshold of 3 months sustained LLDAS or remission as protective, and demonstrate deepening protection with longer durations of sustained LLDAS or remission., Funding: The Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration receives project support grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Sereno, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and UCB., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RK-R received grants from GSK and Novartis. SVN received consulting fees from Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Idorsia; payment for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, and Roche; participation in advisory board for Biogen; and leadership of societies, unpaid (CEO of Rheumatology Educational Trust Foundation, and Head of the SLE Special Interest Group at the Philippine Rheumatology Association). ZL received consulting fees from Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, and UCB, and has royalties with Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, and UCB. SS received consulting fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and ZP Therapeutics. YK received payment or honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Pfizer Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. MH received institutional research grants from GSK and Novartis; and honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca and Astellas Pharma. ZZ received payment or honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen, and UCB; and participation in advisory board for Beigene. JK received speaker fees from GSK and Asahi Kasei. TT received grants from Astellas, Asahi Kasei, Chugai, and Mitsubishi Tanabe, and consulting fees from Astellas and Chugai. FG is Director of the Board of the Australian Rheumatology Association. KN received Advisory Board participation fees from AbbVie. YT received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Taisho, and Chugai; and speaker fees or honoraria from AbbVie, Eisai, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Taisho, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Pfizer, UCB, Asahi-kasei, and Astellas. AH received a research grant from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from EUSA Pharma (UK); and speaker fees or honoraria from Limbic, Novartis, Moose Republic, AbbVie, and Eli Lilly. MN received an Investigator Grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC GNT1176538); research grants from Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from AstraZeneca and GSK; honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and support for conference attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim. EFM received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Genetech, Janssen, Novartis, Servier, and EMD Serono. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objectives: Unraveling the mechanisms underlying treatment response for targeted therapeutics in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is challenging due to the limited understanding of diverse responses of circulating immune cells, particularly B cells. We investigated B lymphocyte dynamics during anti-BAFF treatment, utilizing longitudinal single-cell transcriptome data., Methods: We conducted single-cell RNA sequencing on PBMCs in four Korean SLE patients before and after belimumab treatment at the following time points: 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months., Results: Analyzing over 73 000 PBMCs, we identified 8 distinct subsets of B cells and plasmablasts and analyzed dynamic changes within these cell subsets: initial declines in naive and transitional B cells followed by an increase at three months, contrasted by an initial increase and subsequent decrease in memory B cells by the third month. Meanwhile, plasmablasts exhibited a consistent decline throughout treatment. B cell activation pathways, specifically in naive and memory B cells, were downregulated during the third and sixth months. These findings were validated at the protein level throughout the first four weeks of treatment using flow cytometry. Comparative analysis with bulk transcriptome data from 22 Japanese SLE patients showed increased NR4A1 expression six months post-belimumab treatment, indicating its role in restricting self-reactive B cells, thereby contributing to the biological responses of anti-BAFF treatment., Conclusion: The observed B cell dynamics provided insights into the immunological mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of anti-BAFF in SLE patients. Furthermore, it underscores the need for research in predicting drug responses based on immune profiling., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To determine the risk factors for mortality in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in comparison to patients with RA but without ILD (RA-nonILD)., Methods: Data were extracted from a single-centre prospective cohort of RA patients with a chest computed tomography scan at an academic referral hospital in Korea. Patients with RA-ILD enroled between May 2017 and August 2022 were selected, and those without ILD were selected as comparators. The mortality rate was calculated, and the causes of each death were investigated. We used Cox proportional hazard regression with Firth's penalised likelihood method to identify the risk factors for mortality in patients with RA-ILD., Results: A total of 615 RA patients were included: 200 with ILD and 415 without ILD. In the RA-ILD group, there were 15 deaths over 540.1 person-years (PYs), resulting in mortality rate of 2.78/100 PYs. No deaths were reported in the RA-nonILD group during the 1669.9 PYs. The primary causes of death were infection (nine cases) and lung cancer (five cases), with only one death attributed to ILD aggravation. High RA activity (adjusted HR 1.87, CI 1.16-3.10), baseline diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 60% (adjusted HR 4.88, 95% CI 1.11-45.94), and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (adjusted HR 5.13, 95% CI 1.00-57.36) were identified as risk factors for mortality in RA-ILD patients., Conclusion: Patients with RA-ILD have an elevated risk of mortality compared with those without ILD. Infection-related deaths are the main causes of mortality in this population. High RA activity, low DLCO, and the UIP pattern are significantly associated with the mortality in patients with RA-ILD., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To assess the risk of flare and damage accrual after tapering glucocorticoids (GCs) in modified serologically active clinically quiescent (mSACQ) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: Data from a 12-country longitudinal SLE cohort, collected prospectively between 2013 and 2020, were analysed. SLE patients with mSACQ defined as the state with serological activity (increased anti-dsDNA and/or hypocomplementemia) but without clinical activity, treated with ≤7.5 mg/day of prednisolone-equivalent GCs and not-considering duration, were studied. The risk of subsequent flare or damage accrual per 1 mg decrease of prednisolone was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models while adjusting for confounders. Observation periods were 2 years and censored if each event occurred., Results: Data from 1850 mSACQ patients were analysed: 742, 271 and 180 patients experienced overall flare, severe flare and damage accrual, respectively. Tapering GCs by 1 mg/day of prednisolone was not associated with increased risk of overall or severe flare: adjusted HRs 1.02 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.05) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.004), respectively. Antimalarial use was associated with decreased flare risk. Tapering GCs was associated with decreased risk of damage accrual (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.99) in the patients whose initial prednisolone dosages were >5 mg/day., Conclusions: In mSACQ patients, tapering GCs was not associated with increased flare risk. Antimalarial use was associated with decreased flare risk. Tapering GCs protected mSACQ patients treated with >5 mg/day of prednisolone against damage accrual. These findings suggest that cautious GC tapering is feasible and can reduce GC use in mSACQ patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: YK received honoraria from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline KK, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Pfizer Japan, Sanofi KK. EI received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb KK, Eisai and consulting fees from Nippontect Systems. MH received honoraria from AbbVie GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, consulting fees from AbbVie GK, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Teijin Pharma, grant/research support from AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Kayaku, Sekisui Medical, Shionogi, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma. AH received honoraria from UCB, Janssen, Sandoz, Eli Lilly, consulting fees from AbbVie, GSK and grant/research support from AstraZeneca, GSK, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck Serono. CSL received honoraria from AstraZeneca UK and consulting fee from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. ZL received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, UCB Pharma and consulting fees from Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, UCB Pharma. SS received consulting fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ZP Therapeutics and grant/research support from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ZP Therapeutics. SVN received consulting fees from Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, grant/research support from Jannsen, Novartis, Pfizer, GSK and support for attending meetings from Biogen. SOon received royalty from Venetoclax. KN is on the advisory board for AbbVie. TT received honoraria from AbbVie GK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, consulting fees from AbbVie GK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma and grant/research support from AbbVie GK, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. YT received honoraria from AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma, AstraZeneca K.K., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Taisho Pharmaceutical and grant/research support from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Taisho Pharmaceutical. MN received honoraria from Actelion, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Certa Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB and grant/research support from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, UCB. EFM received honoraria from AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Gilead, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Novartis and grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, UCB. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

The hallmarks of spondyloarthritis (SpA) are type 3 immunity-driven inflammation and new bone formation (NBF). Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was found to be a key driver of the pathogenesis of SpA by amplifying type 3 immunity, yet MIF-interacting molecules and networks remain elusive. Herein, we identified hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF1A) as an interacting partner molecule of MIF that drives SpA pathologies, including inflammation and NBF. HIF1A expression was increased in the joint tissues and synovial fluid of SpA patients and curdlan-injected SKG (curdlan-SKG) mice compared to the respective controls. Under hypoxic conditions in which HIF1A was stabilized, human and mouse neutrophils exhibited substantially increased expression of MIF and IL-23, an upstream type 3 immunity-related cytokine. Similar to MIF, systemic overexpression of IL-23 induced SpA pathology in SKG mice, while the injection of a HIF1A-selective inhibitor (PX-478) into curdlan-SKG mice prevented or attenuated SpA pathology, as indicated by a marked reduction in the expression of MIF and IL-23. Furthermore, genetic deletion of MIF or HIF1A inhibition with PX-478 in IL-23-overexpressing SKG mice did not induce evident arthritis or NBF, despite the presence of psoriasis-like dermatitis and blepharitis. We also found that MIF- and IL-23-expressing neutrophils infiltrated areas of the NBF in curdlan-SKG mice. These neutrophils potentially increased chondrogenesis and cell proliferation via the upregulation of STAT3 in periosteal cells and ligamental cells during endochondral ossification. Together, these results provide supporting evidence for an MIF/HIF1A regulatory network, and inhibition of HIF1A may be a novel therapeutic approach for SpA by suppressing type 3 immunity-mediated inflammation and NBF., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to CSI and USTC.)

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of Korean Red Ginseng (KRG) in managing fatigue in Korean patients with rheumatic diseases., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to KRG (2 g/day, n = 60) or placebo (n = 60) groups for 12 weeks of blind phase and then open-label KRG from weeks 12 to 24 (placebo-KRG, continuous-KRG). The primary outcome was the improvement rate in fatigue, defined by an increase in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue scores at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in FACIT-Fatigue and fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) between 0 and 12 weeks and those changes in both indices at 24 weeks., Results: The study enrolled 120 patients (Sjogren syndrome [n = 53], rheumatoid arthritis [n = 43], or both diseases [n = 24]). The mean age was 50.9 ± 11.6 years, with 97.5% being female. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The improvement rate in FACIT-Fatigue after 12 weeks was higher in the KRG group than in the placebo group, but the difference was statistically insignificant (38.3% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.242). Improvement in fatigue was observed in both groups by increases in FACIT-F (4.6 vs. 4.0) and reductions in fatigue VAS (-16.0 vs. -12.2) scores at 12 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events during KRG use were pruritus and urticarial, with no significant difference between the two groups., Conclusion: Both KRG and placebo groups showed significant reductions in fatigue. KRG treatment for 24 weeks did not reduce fatigue symptoms more than the placebo in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Background: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) have shown dramatic benefit in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Tapering of TNFi medication may be considered in patients with sustained low disease activity because continued use of TNFis at standard doses may increase the risk of side effects including infections and impose an economic burden. However, the optimal TNFi tapering strategy for SpA patients with inactive disease has not been established. In the present study, we investigated whether tapering TNFi doses is associated with similar risk of disease flare to maintaining SpA patients on TNFis at the standard dosage., Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systemically searched to retrieve randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies published prior to August 2023, that compared disease flare in SpA (including axial SpA [axSpA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and SpA with IBD) patients who received standard TNFi doses and those who received a tapered dose of TNFi. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were directly retrieved or calculated, and meta-analyses were performed. Bias was assessed using funnel plots with Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation / Egger's regression method., Results: Among 2,237 SpA patients in the 12 studies (9 RCTs and 3 observational studies) retrieved, 1,301 received the standard TNFi dose, while 936 SpA patients underwent TNFi tapering. Of these, 216 (16.6%) standard-dose TNFi and 217 (23.2%) TNF-tapering patients experienced disease flares. The pooled OR for disease flare in TNFi-tapering patients was 1.601 (95% CI 1.276 - 2.008) compared with the standard-dose patients. The funnel plot showed no publication bias., Conclusions: The strategy of TNFi tapering was associated with a significantly increased risk of disease flare compared to maintaining SpA patients at the standard TNF dose. Further studies are needed to determine which patients can safely undergo tapering of TNFi and to develop safe tapering strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is three times more common and its manifestations are more severe in African American women compared to women of other races. It is not clear whether this is due to genetic differences or factors related to the physical or social environments, differences in health care, or a combination of these factors. Health disparities in patients with SLE between African American patients and persons of other races have been reported since the 1960s and are correlated with measures of lower socioeconomic status. Risk factors for these disparities have been demonstrated, but whether their mitigation improves outcomes for African American patients has not been tested except in self-efficacy. In 2002, the first true US population-based study of patients with SLE with death certificate records was conducted, which demonstrated a wide disparity between the number of African American women and White women dying from SLE. Five years ago, another study showed that SLE mortality rates in the United States had improved but that the African American patient mortality disparity persisted. Between 2014 and 2021, one study demonstrated racism's deleterious effects in patients with SLE. Racism may have been the unmeasured confounder, the proverbial "elephant in the room"-unnamed and unstudied. The etymology of "risk factor" has evolved from environmental risk factors to social determinants to now include structural injustice/structural racism. Racism in the United States has a centuries-long existence and is deeply ingrained in US society, making its detection and resolution difficult. However, racism being man made means Man can choose to change the it. Health disparities in patients with SLE should be addressed by viewing health care as a basic human right. We offer a conceptual framework and goals for both individual and national actions., (© 2024 American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Anti-TNF biologics have been widely used to ameliorate disease activity in patients with RA. However, a large fraction of patients show a poor response to these agents. Moreover, no clinically applicable predictive biomarkers have been established. This study aimed to identify response-associated biomarkers using longitudinal transcriptomic data in two independent RA cohorts., Methods: RNA sequencing data from peripheral blood cell samples of Korean and Caucasian RA cohorts before and after initial treatment with anti-TNF biologics were analysed to assess treatment-induced expression changes that differed between highly reliable excellent responders and null responders. Weighted correlation network, immune cell composition, and key driver analyses were performed to understand response-associated transcriptomic networks and cell types and their correlation with disease activity indices., Results: In total, 305 response-associated genes showed significantly different treatment-induced expression changes between excellent and null responders. Co-expression network construction and subsequent key driver analysis revealed that 41 response-associated genes played a crucial role as key drivers of transcriptomic alteration in four response-associated networks involved in various immune pathways: type I IFN signalling, myeloid leucocyte activation, B cell activation, and NK cell/lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. Transcriptomic response scores that we developed to estimate the individual-level degree of expression changes in the response-associated key driver genes were significantly correlated with the changes in clinical indices in independent patients with moderate or ambiguous response outcomes., Conclusion: This study provides response-specific treatment-induced transcriptomic signatures by comparing the transcriptomic landscape between patients with excellent and null responses to anti-TNF drugs at both gene and network levels., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Cranial neuropathies (CN) are a rare neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) manifestation. Previous studies reported that antibodies to the kinesin family member 20B (KIF20B) (anti-KIF20B) protein were associated with idiopathic ataxia and CN. We assessed anti-KIF20B as a potential biomarker for NPSLE in an international SLE inception cohort., Methods: Individuals fulfilling the revised 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria were enrolled from 31 centres from 1999 to 2011 and followed annually in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort. Anti-KIF20B testing was performed on baseline (within 15 months of diagnosis or first annual visit) samples using an addressable laser bead immunoassay. Logistic regression (penalised maximum likelihood and adjusting for confounding variables) examined the association between anti-KIF20B and NPSLE manifestations (1999 ACR case definitions), including CN, occurring over the first 5 years of follow-up., Results: Of the 1827 enrolled cohort members, baseline serum and 5 years of follow-up data were available on 795 patients who were included in this study: 29.8% were anti-KIF20B-positive, 88.7% female, and 52.1% White. The frequency of anti-KIF20B positivity differed only for those with CN (n=10) versus without CN (n=785) (70.0% vs 29.3%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4, 18.5). Compared with patients without CN, patients with CN were more likely to fulfil the ACR haematological (90.0% vs 66.1%; difference 23.9%, 95% CI 5.0%, 42.8%) and ANA (100% vs 95.7%; difference 4.3%, 95% CI 2.9%, 5.8%) criteria. In the multivariate analysis adjusting for age at baseline, female, White race and ethnicity, and ACR haematological and ANA criteria, anti-KIF20B positivity remained associated with CN (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4, 19.1)., Conclusion: Anti-KIF20B is a potential biomarker for SLE-related CN. Further studies are needed to examine how autoantibodies against KIF20B, which is variably expressed in a variety of neurological cells, contribute to disease pathogenesis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MYC has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Werfen, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Celltrion, Organon, and MitogenDx (less than $10 000). AEC has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche and Otsuka (less than $10 000 each) and a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline. CG has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Serono and BMS (less than $10 000 each) and grants from UCB. Grants from UCB were given not to CG but to Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust. DDG received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline (less than $10 000). INB has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Eli Lilly, UCB, Roche, Merck Serono and MedImmune (less than $10 000 each), and grants from UCB, Genzyme, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline. EMG has paid consultation with investment analysts Guidepoint Global Gerson Lehrman Group. KCK has received grants from UCB, Human Genome Sciences/GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Ablynx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and has received consulting fees from Exagen Diagnostics, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb and Anthera (less than $10 000 each). MJF is Director of Mitogen Diagnostics Corporation (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) and a consultant to Werfen International (Barcelona, Spain), Grifols (Barcelona, Spain), Janssen Pharmaceuticals of Johnson & Johnson and Alexion Canada (less than $10 000 each)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease, characterized by excessive new bone formation. We previously reported that the complement factor H-related protein-5 (CFHR5), a member of the human factor H protein family, is significantly elevated in patients with AS compared to other rheumatic diseases. However, the pathophysiological mechanism underlying new bone formation by CFHR5 is not fully understood. In this study, we revealed that CFHR5 and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-23) were elevated in the AS group compared to the HC group. Correlation analysis revealed that CFHR5 levels were not significantly associated with proinflammatory cytokines, while CFHR5 levels in AS were only positively correlated with the high CRP group. Notably, treatment with soluble CFHR5 has no effect on clinical arthritis scores and thickness at hind paw in curdlan-injected SKG, but significantly increased the ectopic bone formation at the calcaneus and tibia bones of the ankle as revealed by micro-CT image and quantification. Basal CFHR5 expression was upregulated in AS-osteoprogenitors compared to control cells. Also, treatment with CFHR5 remarkedly induced bone mineralization status of AS-osteoprogenitors during osteogenic differentiation accompanied by MMP13 expression. We provide the first evidence demonstrating that CFHR5 can exacerbate the pathological bone formation of AS. Therapeutic modulation of CFHR5 could be promising for future treatment of AS. KEY MESSAGES: Serum level of CFHR5 is elevated and positively correlated with high CRP group of AS patients. Recombinant CFHR5 protein contributes to pathological bone formation in in vivo model of AS. CFHR5 is highly expressed in AS-osteoprogenitors compared to disease control. Recombinant CFHR5 protein increased bone mineralization accompanied by MMP13 in vitro model of AS., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is chronic inflammatory arthritis causing structural damage and radiographic progression to the spine due to repeated and continuous inflammation over a long period. This study establishes the application of machine learning models to predict radiographic progression in AS patients using time-series data from electronic medical records (EMRs)., Methods: EMR data, including baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, drug administration, and modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS), were collected from 1,123 AS patients between January 2001 and December 2018 at a single center at the time of first (T1), second (T2), and third (T3) visits. The radiographic progression of the (n+1)th visit (Pn+1=(mSASSSn+1-mSASSSn)/(Tn+1-Tn)≥1 unit per year) was predicted using follow-up visit datasets from T1 to Tn. We used three machine learning methods (logistic regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operation, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting algorithms) with three-fold cross-validation., Results: The random forest model using the T1 EMR dataset best predicted the radiographic progression P2 among the machine learning models tested with a mean accuracy and area under the curves of 73.73% and 0.79, respectively. Among the T1 variables, the most important variables for predicting radiographic progression were in the order of total mSASSS, age, and alkaline phosphatase., Conclusion: Prognosis predictive models using time-series data showed reasonable performance with clinical features of the first visit dataset when predicting radiographic progression., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST B.S.K. has been an editorial board member since May 2022, but has no role in the decision to publish this article. The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 by The Korean College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this prospective, observational multicenter study (NCT03264703) was to compare the effectiveness of single conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (cDMARD) plus anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy versus multiple cDMARD treatments in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following cDMARD failure in the real-world setting in South Korea., Methods: At the treating physicians' discretion, patients received single cDMARD plus anti-TNF therapy or multiple cDMARDs. Changes from baseline in disease activity score 28-joint count with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), corticosteroid use, and Korean Health Assessment Questionnaire (KHAQ-20) scores were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months., Results: Of 207 enrollees, the final analysis included 45 of 73 cDMARD plus anti-TNF and 91 of 134 multiple-cDMARD recipients. There were no significant between-group differences (BGDs) in ANCOVA-adjusted changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR at 3, 6 (primary endpoint), and 12 months (BGDs -0.18, -0.38, and -0.03, respectively). More cDMARD plus anti-TNF than multiple-cDMARD recipients achieved a >50% reduction from baseline in corticosteroid dosage at 12 months (35.7% vs 14.6%; p=0.007). Changes from baseline in KHAQ-20 scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better with cDMARD plus anti-TNF therapy than with multiple cDMARDs (BGD -0.18, -0.19, and -0.19 points, respectively; all p ≤ 0.024)., Conclusion: In the real-world setting, relative to multiple cDMARDs, single cDMARD plus anti-TNF therapy significantly improved quality-of-life scores and reduced corticosteroid use, with no significant BGD in disease activity, in RA patients in whom previous cDMARD therapy had failed., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST Y.K.S. has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai Korea Inc., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, and JW Pharmaceuticals Corporation; and consulting fees from Immunoforge Co. Ltd. M.W.S., S.H.K., D.W.K., J.Y.C., S.I.L., J.W.H., H.S.L., and S.H.L. have received research funding from Eisai Korea Inc. for this study. J.R.K. is an employee of Eisai Korea Inc., (Copyright © 2024 by The Korean College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.)