Search

Background: Evidence on the influence of programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) in EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is at variance. Methods: A single‐center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the influence of PD‐L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR‐TKIs for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Clinical information was retrieved from electronic medical records. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to PD‐L1 expression level: PD‐L1 < 1% (negative), PD‐L1 1%–49% and PD‐L1 ≥ 50%. The clinicopathological features, overall response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS) and comutation information were collected and compared between the three subgroups. Results: A total of 117 patients were included. For PD‐L1 < 1%, PD‐L1 1%–49% and PD‐L1 ≥ 50% group, there were 39 (33.3%), 51 (43.5%) and 27 (23.0%) patients respectively, and the ORR was 43.2%, 64.0%, and 51.9%, respectively (p = 0.162), and the median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 22.0 months (95% CI: 14.0–29.9 months), 15.4 months (95% CI: 8.9–21.8 months) and 13.0 months (95% CI: 10.6–15.3 months), respectively (log‐rank, p = 0.01). The mPFS was negatively correlated with PD‐L1 expression level (r = −0.264, p = 0.041) and PD‐L1 expression was an independent risk factor for worse PFS of EGFR‐TKIs in multivariate Cox regression. Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation had shorter PFS (p = 0.039) and the patients harboring both mutant TP53 and positive PD‐L1 had the shortest PFS (p = 0.006). Conclusions: The efficacy of EGFR‐TKIs was influenced by the baseline PD‐L1 expression. Higher PD‐L1 expression was associated with shorter PFS. The combined indicators of TP53 and PD‐L1 identified subgroups showing divergent benefits from EGFR‐TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin for the treatment of advanced thymic carcinoma. Thirty-seven patients (23 men and 14 women, median age 47 years, performance status score ≤2) with pathologically or cytologically diagnosed advanced thymic carcinoma were recruited. Patients received 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel on day 1 and 75 mg/m2 cisplatin or 300 mg/m2 carboplatin on day 2 of a 21 day cycle for at least two cycles to evaluate efficacy and adverse events. No complete response ( CR) was observed; 11 patients had a partial response ( PR), 16 patients had no change ( NC), and 10 had progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate of 29.7%, a stable rate of 43.2%, and a disease control rate ( CR + PR + NC) of 72.9%. Grade I/ II and III/ IV neutropenia were observed in 21 (56.7%) and 13 (35.1%) patients, respectively. Four (10.8%) patients developed grade I/ II thrombocytopenia. Grade I/ II and III/ IV nausea and vomiting were observed in 19 (51.2%) and five (13.5%) patients, respectively. Grade I/ II liver dysfunction was observed in seven (18.9%) patients. Two patients with grade III liver dysfunction recovered after hepatoprotective treatment. The combination of paclitaxel and platinum was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to elucidate clinical significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in selected advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), to compare the application of different ALK detection methods, and especially evaluate a possible association between ALK expression and clinical outcomes in crizotinib-treated patients. Methods: ALK status was assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) in 173 selected advanced NSCLC patients. Clinicopathologic data, genotype status and survival outcomes were analyzed. Moreover, the association of ALK expression with clinical outcomes was evaluated in ALK FISH-positive crizotinib-treated patients including two patients with concurrent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Results: The positivity detection rate of ALK rearrangement by FISH, IHC and qRT-PCR was 35.5% (59/166), 35.7% (61/171), and 27.9% (34/122), respectively. ALK rearrangement was observed predominantly in young patients, never or light smokers, and adenocarcinomas, especially with signet ring cell features and poor differentiation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) of crizotinib-treated patients was 7.6 months. The overall survival (OS) of these patients was longer compared with that of crizotinib-naive or wild-type cohorts, but there was no significant difference in OS compared with patients with EGFR mutation. ALK expression did not associate with PFS; but, when ALK expression was analyzed as a dichotomous variable, moderate and strong ALK expression had a decreased risk of death (P = 0.026). The two patients with concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations showed difference in ALK expression, response to EGFR and ALK inhibitors, and overall survival. Conclusions: Selective enrichment according to clinicopathologic features in NSCLC patients could highly improve the positivity detection rate of ALK rearrangement for ALK-targeted therapy. IHC could provide more clues for clinical trial design and therapeutic strategies for ALK-positive NSCLC patients including patients with double genetic aberration of ALK and EGFR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABP) monotherapy in treating recurrent advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the short-term efficacy and toxicities of ABP monotherapy in treating 21 patients who had previously undergone multiple cycles of therapy for their advanced NSCLC in our hospital since 2010. The treatment-related survival was also analyzed., Results: Of these 21 patients, the best overall response was partial response (PR) in 6 patients (28.6%), stable disease (SD) in 10 patients (47.6%), and progressive disease (PD) in 5 patients (23.8%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 28.6% and the disease control rate (DCR) (PR + SD) was 76.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-7.0 months). The main grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (11.1%), peripheral nerve toxicity (5.6%), muscle and joint aches (5.6%), and fatigue (5.6%)., Conclusions: The ABP monotherapy can achieve good objective response in advanced NSCLC patients who have previously received multiple cycles of treatment and be well tolerated.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer who had benefits from initial gefitinib treatment but finally demonstrated resistance, especially in those of unknown EGFR mutation status, and to compare the efficacy of erlotinib between patients who received erlotinib immediately after gefitinib failure and those who received chemotherapy before erlotinib., Methods: Forty Chinese patients who had been treated with erlotinib (150 mg daily) after gefitinib (250 mg daily) failure were evaluated retrospectively. All of these patients had achieved gefitinib treatment for at least three months with response of partial remission or stable disease. Among them, 16 patients shifted to erlotinib immediately after progression (Group G-E), and the other 24 patients inserted chemotherapy between gefitinib and erlotinib (Group G-C-E)., Results: In the whole group, the disease control rate (DCR) of erlotinib was 52.5% (21/40) while the objective response rate (RR) was only 10.0% (4/40). The RR of the group G-E was 6.2% and the group G-C-E was 12.5%, and the DCR was 56.2% and 50.0% in the two groups, respectively, both without significant differences (P = 0.638 and P = 0.755). There was no correlation between the efficacy of erlotinib and that of initial gefitinib in both group G-E and group G-C-E (P = 0.365 and P = 0.658). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the erlotinib treatment were 3.0 and 12.0 months in the 40 patients. Statistically no significant difference was observed in PFS (4 months in the group G-E and 2 months in the group G-C-E, P = 0.768) and OS (12 months in both Groups, P = 0.510)., Conclusions: Erlotinib can be considered either immediately after gefitinib failure or following the insertion of chemotherapy after gefitinib failure in progressive non-small cell lung cancer patients who initially benefited from gefitinib.

Objective: To compare the chemotherapeutic efficacies of third-generation plus platinum doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: A total of 1112 patients were diagnosed as advanced NSCLC at Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Cancer Hospital from January 2005 to August 2009. Their clinical efficacies and regimen compositions were retrospectively analyzed. All calculations were performed by SPSS 17.0., Results: Differences in objective response rate (ORR) existed among four third-generation agents (paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine and docetaxel) plus platinum doublets. Their ORRs were 35.6%, 35.4%, 25.9% and 37.4% respectively (χ(2) = 16.331, P = 0.001). And vinorelbine doublets had the lowest ORR (all P < 0.01). The ORRs of cisplatin and carboplatin doublets were 35.2% and 33.5% respectively. There was no difference in ORR among them (χ(2) = 0.352, P = 0.569). Subgroup analysis showed that the ORRs of four third generation plus platinum doublets were 34.8%, 35.3%, 23.2% and 37.1% in non-agers. And the vinorelbine doublets performed the worst. In the patients with squamous-cell lung cancer, the ORRs of paclitaxel and gemcitabine doublets were 45.5% and 28.4% respectively. And the paclitaxel doublets had the better performance (χ(2) = 5.250, P = 0.026). When combined with carboplatin, the ORRs of four doublets were 36.2%, 16.7%, 15.4% and 32.0% respectively. And the paclitaxel regimen was more effective than the gemcitabine and vinorelbine regimens (P = 0.018 and P = 0.034). The influences of subsequent therapy were nullified when the progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed. The PFSs of these doublets were (3.67 ± 0.19), (2.95 ± 0.18), (3.05 ± 0.36) and (3.40 ± 0.37) months respectively. There was no difference among them. Pairwise comparisons showed that the mean PFS of patients on paclitaxel doublets was longer than those on gemcitabine doublets. And their PFSs were (3.67 ± 0.19) and (2.95 ± 0.18) months respectively (χ(2) = 7.037, P = 0.008). The PFSs of cisplatin and carboplatin doublets were (3.05 ± 0.14) and (3.65 ± 0.20) months respectively. The patients on carboplatin doublets had a longer PFS than that of those on cisplatin doublets (χ(2) = 6.012, P = 0.014)., Conclusions: No difference exist in ORRs among different third-generation plus platinum doublets. But as the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, carboplatin doublets is superior to cisplatin doublets in terms of PFS.

Objective: To evaluate the effect and adverse effects of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of primary hepatocarcinoma patients, and conduct the pharmacokinetics study., Methods: A total of one hundred and eleven advanced primary hepatocarcinoma patients in five centers were treated with As2O3 injection 7 - 8 mg/m(2) i.v. qd for 14 days and was repeated after 7 - 14 days. Evaluation of the clinical response and adverse effects was conducted after two cycles of treatment. The patient who had reached partial PR and SD was treated continuously until disease progression or intolerance., Results: Among the 102 patients evaluable for clinical efficacy analysis, there were 7 PR, 71 SD and 24 PD, the response rate was 6.9% and the clinical benefit rate was 76.5%. The quality of life was improved in 22.5% of patients. The pain relief rate was 71.7%, time to progress (TTP) was 97 days, and the median survival time (MST) was 195 days. The major adverse effects were reversible WHO I-II grade gastrointestinal reactions and bone marrow suppression. The results of pharmacokinetic study showed that the distribution and elimination characteristics in vivo was found to be a two-compartment model. The plasma elimination half-life was (23.94 ± 18.39) h., Conclusions: As2O3 is effective in the management of primary hepatocarcinoma, with a significant analgesic effect. To some extent, it can extend TTP and MST in advanced liver cancer patients, while the treatment is well tolerated in the majority of patients.

Objective: To analyze the association between the EGFR protein level and the EGFR gene mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to explore whether the EGFR protein level is related to the efficacy and survival of the EGFR-TKI drug Gifitinib-treated patients with advanced NSCLC., Methods: Ninety-nine cases were enrolled in this study. Pathological tissue specimens and paired peripheral blood samples were collected. Exons 19 and 21 of the EGFR gene mutation were detected by direct sequencing. The concentration of plasma EGFR protein was detected by ELISA. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses of the efficacy and survival were performed using SPSS 13.0 software., Results: The response rate (RR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of Gefitinib-treated patients were 51.5% and 79.8%, respectively. There were 35 (35.4%) with positive EGFR gene mutation of the 99 samples. The concentration limit of EGFR protein was 55.42 µg/L. The RR and CBR of patients with EGFR gene mutation was significantly higher than those without mutation (65.7% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.037; 94.3% vs. 71.9%, P = 0.008). The median PFS was prolonged (23 months vs. 10 months, P = 0.014). The CBR of patients with high EGFR protein expression (concentration ≥ 55.42 µg/L) was significantly higher than those with low expression (90.0% vs 64.1%, P = 0.004), and the median PFS was prolonged (21 months vs. 8 months, P = 0.016). EGFR protein level was an independent factor affecting the EGFR gene mutation status. The Correlation between EGFR gene mutation status and EGFR protein level was positive., Conclusions: Gefitinib is effective in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR gene mutation and high EGFR protein expression. EGFR protein level in peripheral blood may be a molecular biomarker in prediction of efficacy and survival of the Gefitinib treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Objective: To explore the clinical factors affecting the sensitivity of EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer., Methods: Clinical data were retrospective analyzed to determine the clinical factors affecting the outcome of 166 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received EGFR-TKI treatment in our hospttal from January of 2005 to December of 2006., Results: One hundred and nineteen patients benefited from EGFR-TKI treatment in the total of 166 patients and the disease control rate was 71.7%. Among the factors analyzed, sex, age, smoking, pathological type, brain and bone metastasis or not when EGFR-TKI was used, the time using EGFR-TKI and the level of LDH at the time of diagnosis had no significant effect on the clinical benefit rate. Among the 126 patients with serum CEA assayed at diagnosis, 84 cases had a higher serum CEA level. Compared with the patients with normal serum CEA level, the patients with a higher serum CEA level benefited more easily from EGFR-TKI therapy, with a disease control rate of 79.8% and 59.5%, respectively (P = 0.016). Among the patients who got benefits from EGFR-TKI treatment, smoking and the CEA level at diagnosis had effects on the duration of progression-free survival. The progression free survivals were 9.57 ± 6.75 months in non-smokers, 4.86 ± 3.44 months in light-smokers and 5.25 ± 4.34 months in heavy-smokers (P = 0.007). The progression free survival was 9.45 ± 7.48 months in the group with a higher serum CEA level and 6.52 ± 4.46 months in the group with normal serum CEA level (P = 0.036)., Conclusions: In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR-TKIs treatment is safe and effective. The patients with high CEA level are prone to benefit from it.

Objective: To analyze the treatment efficacy after a failed regimen of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 87 patients with advanced NSCLC at our hospital from January of 2005 to December of 2006. All subjects received chemotherapy after a failure of EGFR-TKI, there were 37 cases of male and the median age was 56 ± 11 (range, 31 - 76) years, 50 cases of female, median age 56 ± 13 (range, 31 - 78) years; They received a 2-drug combination chemotherapy (n = 61) and a monodrug chemotherapy (n = 26). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). And the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and side effects., Results: The OS was 9.4 ± 6.0 (range, 2-33) months and ORR 9.2% (8/87). The OS was 9.1 ± 5.2 (range, 2 - 31) months in combination chemotherapy group and 10.0 ± 7.3 (range, 3 - 33) months in monodrug group; the ORRs were 11.5% (7/61) and 3.8% (1/26) respectively in two groups. There was no significant difference in OS and ORR between two groups (P > 0.05). The common side effects were myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting. The rate of myelosuppression was 87.4% (76/87) and that of 3/4 grade myelosuppression 33.3% (29/87). And the rate of nausea/vomiting was 86.2% (75/87) and that of 3/4 grade nausea/vomiting 10.3% (9/87). Other side effects were mild and well-tolerated., Conclusion: If tolerated, chemotherapy after an EGFR-TKI failure may prolong the survival in advanced NSCLC patients.