Search

Designing tight-binding ligands is a primary objective of small-molecule drug discovery. Over the past few decades, free-energy calculations have benefited from improved force fields and sampling algorithms, as well as the advent of low-cost parallel computing. However, it has proven to be challenging to reliably achieve the level of accuracy that would be needed to guide lead optimization (∼5× in binding affinity) for a wide range of ligands and protein targets. Not surprisingly, widespread commercial application of free-energy simulations has been limited due to the lack of large-scale validation coupled with the technical challenges traditionally associated with running these types of calculations. Here, we report an approach that achieves an unprecedented level of accuracy across a broad range of target classes and ligands, with retrospective results encompassing 200 ligands and a wide variety of chemical perturbations, many of which involve significant changes in ligand chemical structures. In addition, we have applied the method in prospective drug discovery projects and found a significant improvement in the quality of the compounds synthesized that have been predicted to be potent. Compounds predicted to be potent by this approach have a substantial reduction in false positives relative to compounds synthesized on the basis of other computational or medicinal chemistry approaches. Furthermore, the results are consistent with those obtained from our retrospective studies, demonstrating the robustness and broad range of applicability of this approach, which can be used to drive decisions in lead optimization.

Since its inception nearly a half century ago, CHARMM has been playing a central role in computational biochemistry and biophysics. Commensurate with the developments in experimental research and advances in computer hardware, the range of methods and applicability of CHARMM have also grown. This review summarizes major developments that occurred after 2009 when the last review of CHARMM was published. They include the following: new faster simulation engines, accessible user interfaces for convenient workflows, and a vast array of simulation and analysis methods that encompass quantum mechanical, atomistic, and coarse-grained levels, as well as extensive coverage of force fields. In addition to providing the current snapshot of the CHARMM development, this review may serve as a starting point for exploring relevant theories and computational methods for tackling contemporary and emerging problems in biomolecular systems. CHARMM is freely available for academic and nonprofit research at https://academiccharmm.org/program.

Relative binding free energy (RBFE) simulation is a rigorous approach to the calculation of quantitatively accurate binding free energy values for protein-ligand binding in which a reference binder is gradually converted to a target binder through alchemical transformation during the simulation. The success of such simulations relies on being able to accurately sample the correct conformational phase space for each alchemical state; however, this becomes a challenge when a significant conformation change occurs between the reference and target binder-receptor complexes. Increasing the simulation time and using enhanced sampling methods can be helpful, but effects can be limited, especially when the free energy barrier between conformations is high or when the correct target complex conformation is difficult to find and maintain. Current RBFE protocols seed the reference complex structure into every alchemical window of the simulation. In our study, we describe an improved protocol in which the reference structure is seeded into the first half of the alchemical windows, and the target structure is seeded into the second half of the alchemical windows. By applying information about the relevant correct end point conformations to different simulation windows from the beginning, the need for large barrier crossings or simulation prediction of the correct structures during an alchemical simulation is in many cases obviated. In the diverse cases we examine below, the simulations yielded free energy predictions that are satisfactory as compared to experiment and superior to running the simulations utilizing the conventional protocol. The method is straightforward to implement for publicly available FEP workflows.

Computational techniques can speed up the identification of hits and accelerate the development of candidate molecules for drug discovery. Among techniques for predicting relative binding affinities, the most consistently accurate is free energy perturbation (FEP), a class of rigorous physics-based methods. However, uncertainty remains about how accurate FEP is and can ever be. Here, we present what we believe to be the largest publicly available dataset of proteins and congeneric series of small molecules, and assess the accuracy of the leading FEP workflow. To ascertain the limit of achievable accuracy, we also survey the reproducibility of experimental relative affinity measurements. We find a wide variability in experimental accuracy and a correspondence between binding and functional assays. When careful preparation of protein and ligand structures is undertaken, FEP can achieve accuracy comparable to experimental reproducibility. Throughout, we highlight reliable protocols that can help maximize the accuracy of FEP in prospective studies., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Accurate prediction of the p K a 's of protein residues is crucial to many applications in biological simulation and drug discovery. Here, we present the use of free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations for the prediction of single-protein residue p K a values. We begin with an initial set of 191 residues with experimentally determined p K a values. To isolate sampling limitations from force field inaccuracies, we develop an algorithm to classify residues whose environments are significantly affected by crystal packing effects. We then report an approach to identify buried histidines that require significant sampling beyond what is achieved in typical FEP calculations. We therefore define a clean data set not requiring algorithms capable of predicting major conformational changes on which other p K a prediction methods can be tested. On this data set, we report an RMSE of 0.76 p K a units for 35 ASP residues, 0.51 p K a units for 44 GLU residues, and 0.67 p K a units for 76 HIS residues.

Transferable high dimensional neural network potentials (HDNNPs) have shown great promise as an avenue to increase the accuracy and domain of applicability of existing atomistic force fields for organic systems relevant to life science. We have previously reported such a potential (Schrödinger-ANI) that has broad coverage of druglike molecules. We extend that work here to cover ionic and zwitterionic druglike molecules expected to be relevant to drug discovery research activities. We report a novel HDNNP architecture, which we call QRNN, that predicts atomic charges and uses these charges as descriptors in an energy model that delivers conformational energies within chemical accuracy when measured against the reference theory it is trained to. Further, we find that delta learning based on a semiempirical level of theory approximately halves the errors. We test the models on torsion energy profiles, relative conformational energies, geometric parameters, and relative tautomer errors.

We report on the development and validation of the OPLS4 force field. OPLS4 builds upon our previous work with OPLS3e to improve model accuracy on challenging regimes of drug-like chemical space that includes molecular ions and sulfur-containing moieties. A novel parametrization strategy for charged species, which can be extended to other systems, is introduced. OPLS4 leads to improved accuracy on benchmarks that assess small-molecule solvation and protein-ligand binding.

To address some of the inherent challenges in modeling metalloenzymes, we here report an extension to the functional form of the OPLS3e force field to include terms adopted from the ligand field molecular mechanics (LFMM) model, including the angular overlap and Morse potential terms. The integration of these terms with OPLS3e, herein referred to as OPLS3e+M, improves the description of metal-ligand interactions and provides accurate relative binding energies and geometric preferences of transition-metal complexes by training to gas-phase density functional theory (DFT) energies. For [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ , OPLS3e+M significantly improves H 2 O binding energies and the geometric preference of the tetra-aqua Cu 2+ complex. In addition, we conduct free-energy perturbation calculations on two pharmaceutically relevant metalloenzyme targets, which include chemical modifications at varying proximity to the binding-site metals, including changes to the metal-binding moiety of the ligand itself. The extensions made to OPLS3e lead to accurate predicted relative binding free energies for these series (mean unsigned error of 1.29 kcal mol -1 ). Our results provide evidence that integration of the LFMM model with OPLS3e can be utilized to predict thermodynamic quantities for such systems near chemical accuracy. With these improvements, we anticipate that robust free-energy perturbation calculations can be employed to accelerate the drug development efforts for metalloenzyme targets.

The prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using free energy perturbation (FEP) is becoming increasingly routine in structure-based drug discovery. Most FEP packages use molecular dynamics (MD) to sample the configurations of proteins and ligands, as MD is well-suited to capturing coupled motion. However, MD can be prohibitively inefficient at sampling water molecules that are buried within binding sites, which has severely limited the domain of applicability of FEP and its prospective usage in drug discovery. In this paper, we present an advancement of FEP that augments MD with grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC), an enhanced sampling method, to overcome the problem of sampling water. We accomplished this without degrading computational performance. On both old and newly assembled data sets of protein-ligand complexes, we show that the use of GCMC in FEP is essential for accurate and robust predictions for ligand perturbations that disrupt buried water.

Building upon the OPLS3 force field we report on an enhanced model, OPLS3e, that further extends its coverage of medicinally relevant chemical space by addressing limitations in chemotype transferability. OPLS3e accomplishes this by incorporating new parameter types that recognize moieties with greater chemical specificity and integrating an on-the-fly parametrization approach to the assignment of partial charges. As a consequence, OPLS3e leads to greater accuracy against performance benchmarks that assess small molecule conformational propensities, solvation, and protein-ligand binding.

A principal goal of drug discovery project is to design molecules that can tightly and selectively bind to the target protein receptor. Accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energies is therefore of central importance in computational chemistry and computer aided drug design. Multiple recent improvements in computing power, classical force field accuracy, enhanced sampling methods, and simulation setup have enabled accurate and reliable calculations of protein-ligands binding free energies, and position free energy calculations to play a guiding role in small molecule drug discovery. In this Account, we outline the relevant methodological advances, including the REST2 (Replica Exchange with Solute Temperting) enhanced sampling, the incorporation of REST2 sampling with convential FEP (Free Energy Perturbation) through FEP/REST, the OPLS3 force field, and the advanced simulation setup that constitute our FEP+ approach, followed by the presentation of extensive comparisons with experiment, demonstrating sufficient accuracy in potency prediction (better than 1 kcal/mol) to substantially impact lead optimization campaigns. The limitations of the current FEP+ implementation and best practices in drug discovery applications are also discussed followed by the future methodology development plans to address those limitations. We then report results from a recent drug discovery project, in which several thousand FEP+ calculations were successfully deployed to simultaneously optimize potency, selectivity, and solubility, illustrating the power of the approach to solve challenging drug design problems. The capabilities of free energy calculations to accurately predict potency and selectivity have led to the advance of ongoing drug discovery projects, in challenging situations where alternative approaches would have great difficulties. The ability to effectively carry out projects evaluating tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of proposed drug candidates, is potentially transformative in enabling hard to drug targets to be attacked, and in facilitating the development of superior compounds, in various dimensions, for a wide range of targets. More effective integration of FEP+ calculations into the drug discovery process will ensure that the results are deployed in an optimal fashion for yielding the best possible compounds entering the clinic; this is where the greatest payoff is in the exploitation of computer driven design capabilities. A key conclusion from the work described is the surprisingly robust and accurate results that are attainable within the conventional classical simulation, fixed charge paradigm. No doubt there are individual cases that would benefit from a more sophisticated energy model or dynamical treatment, and properties other than protein-ligand binding energies may be more sensitive to these approximations. We conclude that an inflection point in the ability of MD simulations to impact drug discovery has now been attained, due to the confluence of hardware and software development along with the formulation of "good enough" theoretical methods and models.