Search

Your search keyword '"Hardman, Charlotte A."' showing total 498 results
Start Over Author "Hardman, Charlotte A."
498 results on '"Hardman, Charlotte A."'

5. Moving from features to functions: Bridging disciplinary understandings of urban environments to support healthy people and ecosystems

Author

Yuille, Andy, Davies, Jessica, Green, Mark, Hardman, Charlotte, Knight, Jo, Marshall, Rachel, Armitt, Hannah, Bane, Miranda, Bush, Alex, Carr, Victoria, Clark, Rebecca, Cox, Sally, Crotty, Felicity, de Bell, Sian, Edwards, Annabelle, Ferguson, Jody, Fry, Rich, Goddard, Mark, Harrod, Andy, Hoyle, Helen E., Irvine, Katherine, Lambrick, Danielle, Leonardi, Nicoletta, Lomas, Michael, Lumber, Ryan, MacLean, Laura, Manoli, Gabriele, Mead, Bethan, Neilson, Louise, Nicholls, Beth, O'Brien, Liz, Pateman, Rachel, Pocock, Michael, Scoffham, Hayley, Sims, Jamie, and White, Piran

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Acute and two-week effects of neotame, stevia rebaudioside M and sucrose-sweetened biscuits on postprandial appetite and endocrine response in adults with overweight/obesity—a randomised crossover trial from the SWEET consortium

Author

Gibbons, Catherine, Beaulieu, Kristine, Almiron-Roig, Eva, Navas-Carretero, Santiago, Martínez, J. Alfredo, O’Hara, Beverley, O’Connor, Dominic, Nazare, Julie-Anne, Le Bail, Alain, Rannou, Cécile, Hardman, Charlotte, Wilton, Moon, Kjølbæk, Louise, Scott, Corey, Moshoyiannis, Hariklia, Raben, Anne, Harrold, Joanne A., Halford, Jason C.G., and Finlayson, Graham

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Impact of acute consumption of beverages containing plant-based or alternative sweetener blends on postprandial appetite, food intake, metabolism, and gastro-intestinal symptoms: Results of the SWEET beverages trial

Author

Almiron-Roig, Eva, Navas-Carretero, Santiago, Castelnuovo, Gabriele, Kjølbæk, Louise, Romo-Hualde, Ana, Normand, Mie, Maloney, Niamh, Hardman, Charlotte A., Hodgkins, Charo E., Moshoyiannis, Hariklia, Finlayson, Graham, Scott, Corey, Raats, Monique M., Harrold, Joanne A., Raben, Anne, Halford, Jason C.G., and Martínez, J. Alfredo

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. What does 'co‐production' look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) projects.

Author

Shaw, Naomi, Hardman, Charlotte A., Boyle, Neil Bernard, Craven, Joanne, Dooley, John, Mead, Bethan R., Morgans, Lisa, Mumby, Hannah, and Pettinger, Clare

Subjects
*NUTRITION policy, *INTELLECT, *INTERPROFESSIONAL relations, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *FOOD industry, *THEMATIC analysis, *RESEARCH, *ACTION research, *ADULT education workshops, *FOOD supply, *STAKEHOLDER analysis, *CASE studies, *INTERPERSONAL relations
Abstract

Co‐production is a collaborative way of working which emphasises the exchange of diverse forms of knowledge in an equal partnership for equal benefits. Co‐produced research is a key strategic aim of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Strategic Priorities Fund; this research programme brings together researchers, policymakers, industry and communities to create positive change in the way food is produced, accessed and consumed. However, more generally, there are diverse understandings of co‐production and a lack of consensus on what 'good practice' looks like. Therefore, this study aimed to identify and map examples of co‐production methods employed across the TUKFS programme. Two creative workshops (n = 15 participants), conversations with TUKFS researchers and stakeholders (n = 15), and systematic analysis of project documents were used to critically explore co‐production activities within six TUKFS projects. A range of co‐production activities were identified. Findings highlighted areas of 'messiness' and complexity, challenges associated with applying co‐production approaches and practical solutions. Four key shared principles for co‐production were identified: (1) Relationships: developing and maintaining reciprocity‐based partnerships; (2) Knowledge: recognising the contribution of diverse forms of expertise; (3) Power: considering power dynamics and addressing imbalances; and (4) Inclusivity: ensuring research is accessible to all who wish to participate. Opportunities for reflection and reflexivity were considered crucial across all these areas. Findings contribute important insights towards a shared conceptual understanding of co‐production for food system transformation research. This paper makes recommendations for researchers, practitioners, academic institutions and funders working in this area of research and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Does urban agriculture contribute to food security, and how might this be achieved?

Author

Mead, Bethan R., Duncombe, Tracey, Gillespie, Rebecca, Pugh, Nina, and Hardman, Charlotte A.

Abstract

Objective: Food system challenges exacerbate inequalities in access to fresh healthy food and threaten food security. Lack of food security, referred to as food insecurity, is associated with poorer physical and mental health outcomes and has been identified as a key challenge to address by calls for food system transformation. Increasing food production through urban agriculture, the production of fruit and vegetables in urban areas, has been identified as a potentially effective contributor to food system transformation, but the effect of this on household or UK-level food security is unclear. This paper reviews international evidence of urban agriculture's impact on food security. Design: Narrative review. Setting: This paper reviews international evidence of urban agriculture's impact on food security. Participants: Previously published international research. Results: Whilst findings are mixed, available evidence suggests that urban agriculture makes a modest, yet positive, contribution to food security by facilitating the availability of and access to fresh fruit and vegetables to food insecure households. Conclusions: Capitalising on the potential for urban agriculture to benefit food security requires government investment and support at both the national and local levels; therefore, increasing access to land for food growing, reducing costs of related resources and collaboration with existing community groups to enhance sharing of skills and expertise are identified as avenues for exploration that may help to achieve this. This review also highlights opportunities for future research in this field that may strengthen the quality of the evidence supporting urban agriculture's impact on food security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Acute and two-week effects of neotame, stevia rebaudioside M and sucrose-sweetened biscuits on postprandial appetite and endocrine response in adults with overweight/obesity:a randomised crossover trial from the SWEET consortium

Author

Gibbons, Catherine, Beaulieu, Kristine, Almiron-Roig, Eva, Navas-Carretero, Santiago, Martínez, J. Alfredo, O'Hara, Beverley, O'Connor, Dominic, Nazare, Julie Anne, Le Bail, Alain, Rannou, Cécile, Hardman, Charlotte, Wilton, Moon, Kjølbæk, Louise, Scott, Corey, Moshoyiannis, Hariklia, Raben, Anne, Harrold, Joanne A., Halford, Jason C.G., Finlayson, Graham, Gibbons, Catherine, Beaulieu, Kristine, Almiron-Roig, Eva, Navas-Carretero, Santiago, Martínez, J. Alfredo, O'Hara, Beverley, O'Connor, Dominic, Nazare, Julie Anne, Le Bail, Alain, Rannou, Cécile, Hardman, Charlotte, Wilton, Moon, Kjølbæk, Louise, Scott, Corey, Moshoyiannis, Hariklia, Raben, Anne, Harrold, Joanne A., Halford, Jason C.G., and Finlayson, Graham

Abstract

Background: Sweeteners and sweetness enhancers (S&SE) are used to replace energy yielding sugars and maintain sweet taste in a wide range of products, but controversy exists about their effects on appetite and endocrine responses in reduced or no added sugar solid foods. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the acute (1 day) and repeated (two-week daily) ingestive effects of 2 S&SE vs. sucrose formulations of biscuit with fruit filling on appetite and endocrine responses in adults with overweight and obesity. Methods: In a randomised crossover trial, 53 healthy adults (33 female, 20 male) with overweight/obesity in England and France consumed biscuits with fruit filling containing 1) sucrose, or reformulated with either 2) Stevia Rebaudioside M (StRebM) or 3) Neotame daily during three, two-week intervention periods with a two-week washout. The primary outcome was composite appetite score defined as [desire to eat + hunger + (100 − fullness) + prospective consumption]/4. Findings: Each formulation elicited a similar reduction in appetite sensations (3-h postprandial net iAUC). Postprandial insulin (2-h iAUC) was lower after Neotame (95% CI (0.093, 0.166); p < 0.001; d = −0.71) and StRebM (95% CI (0.133, 0.205); p < 0.001; d = −1.01) compared to sucrose, and glucose was lower after StRebM (95% CI (0.023, 0.171); p < 0.05; d = −0.39) but not after Neotame (95% CI (−0.007, 0.145); p = 0.074; d = −0.25) compared to sucrose. There were no differences between S&SE or sucrose formulations on ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 or pancreatic polypeptide iAUCs. No clinically meaningful differences between acute vs. two-weeks of daily consumption were found. Interpretation: In conclusion, biscuits reformulated to replace sugar using StRebM or Neotame showed no differences in appetite or endocrine responses, acutely or after a two-week exposure, but can reduce postprandial insulin and glucose response in adults with overweight or obesity. Funding

Published
2024

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results