Search

Competing Interests: Disclosure: SMH has received payments or honoraria from Harrow, Alimera Sciences, Allergan/AbbVie, Biogen, Coherus, Astellas, and Regeneron. The remaining authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Purpose: To review sustained-release intraocular platforms used to treat diseases of the retina and choroid. Methods: A literature review of the current applications of biomaterials for sustained-release therapy in retinal and choroidal diseases was performed. Results: Retinal and choroidal diseases, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME), and uveitis, are commonly treated using intravitreal (IVT) therapies that require frequent IVT injections. Multiple sustained-release options for IVT therapy have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of inflammatory eye diseases, including noninfectious uveitis, infectious diseases, and exudative retinal diseases (eg, retinal venous occlusive disease and DME) using drugs such as fluocinolone acetonide, ganciclovir, and dexamethasone. The platforms for these drugs are biodegradable or nonbiodegradable. They use biomaterials such as polymers and hydrogels and are typically implanted surgically or injected into the vitreous, where they release the drug gradually over months or years. Building on these technologies, novel platforms are being studied that are intended to treat conditions including nAMD, DR, DME, and uveitis. These platforms are being tested for their safety, efficacy, and ability to reduce the injection and visit burden. Conclusions: Multiple sustained-release ocular drug-delivery platforms are currently commercially available, and many new sustained-release IVT platforms are being investigated. The hope is that meaningfully reducing the injection burden by extending intervals between treatments while maintaining optimal efficacy will improve long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Dr. Wykoff: Consulting—4DMT, AbbVie, Adverum, Aerie, AGTC, Alcon, Annexon, Apellis, Arrowhead, Ascidian, Bayer, Bausch+ Lomb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cholgene, Clearside, Curacle, Eyebiotech, EyePoint, Foresite, Frontera, Genentech, Gyroscope, Iveric Bio, Janssen, Kato, Kiora, Kodiak, Kriya, Merck, Nanoscope, Neurotech, NGM, Notal Vision, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Ocuphire, OcuTerra, ONL, Opthea, Oxular, Palatin, PerceiveBio, Perfuse, Ray, RecensMedical, Regeneron, RegenxBio, Resonance, Roche, Sanofi, SciNeuro, Stealth, Surrozen, Suzhou Raymon, THEA, TissueGen, Valo. Grants—4DMT, Adverum, AffaMed, Alexion, Alimera, Alkahest, Allgenesis, Amgen, Annexin, Annexon, Apellis, Asclepix, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chengdu Kanghong, Clearside, Curacle, EyePoint, Gemini, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Gyroscope, Ionis, iRenix, Iveric Bio, Janssen, Kodiak, LMRI, McMaster University, Nanoscope, Neurotech, NGM, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Ocuphire, OcuTerra, OliX, Ophthotech, Opthea, Oxurion, Oxular, Oyster Point, PerceiveBio, Regeneron, RegenxBio, Rezolute, Roche, SamChunDang Pharm, Sandoz, Shanghai Henlius, UNITY, Verily, Xbrane. Stock options (not owner)—ONL, PolyPhotonix, RecensMedical, TissueGen, Visgenx, Vitranu. Dr. Kuppermann: Consulting—Allegro Ophthalmics, Allergan/AbbVie, Aviceda Therapeutics, Bausch+Lomb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clearside, EyeBio, Eyedaptic, EyePoint, Genentech Inc, Glaukos Corporation, InflammX Therapeutics, Iveric Bio, jCyte, Molecular Partners, Neurotech, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ocular Therapeutix, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, ReVana Therapeutics, Ripple Therapeutics, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Stealth, Theravance Biopharma. Research support—Allergan, Apellis, Clearside, Genentech Inc, Ionis, Iveric Bio, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, RegenxBio. Speaker fees—Allergan, Genentech, Roche. Dr. Kuppermann acknowledges an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute. Dr. Regillo: Consulting—4DMT, Adverum, Allergan, Annexon, Apellis, Aviceda, Bausch and Lomb, Clearside, Cognition, Eyepoint, Genentech, Iveric, Janssen, Kodiak, Lineage, Merck, NGM, Novartis, Ocugen, Ocuterra, Occuphire, Opthea, Ray, RegenxBio, Stealth, Thea, Zeiss. Research grant support—Adverum, Allergan, Annexon, Apellis, Astellas, EyePoint, Genentech, Gyroscope, Iveric, Janssen, Kodiak, Lineage, NGM, Notal, Novartis, Ocugen, Ocuterra, Opthea, Regeneron, RegenxBio. Dr. Chang: Consulting—Genentech, RegenxBio, Iveric Bio. Research support—Regeneron, Allergan, Novartis, NGM, Opthea, Eyebio, OcuTerra, Alexion, Mylan. Dr. Hariprasad: Consulting/speaker fees—Alimera Sciences, Allergan, EyePoint, Regeneron, Biogen, Apellis, Iveric Bio. Drs. Duker, Altaf, and Saïm are employees of EyePoint Pharmaceuticals., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Purpose: Metformin has been suggested to protect against the development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in multiple observational studies. However, the association between metformin and geographic atrophy (GA), a debilitating subtype of AMD, has not been analyzed., Methods: We conducted a case-control study of patients ages 60 years and older with new-onset International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding of GA in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases between 2017 and 2021. Cases were matched with propensity scores estimated by age, region, hypertension, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to a control without GA of the same year. Exposure to metformin was assessed for cases and controls in the year prior to their index visit. Conditional multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for AMD risk factors, was used to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study design and analysis were repeated in a sample of patients without diabetes., Results: In the full sample, we identified 10,505 cases with GA and 10,502 matched controls without GA. In total, 1149 (10.9%) cases and 1277 (12.2%) controls were exposed to metformin, and in multivariable regression, metformin decreased the odds of new-onset ICD coding of GA by 12% (95% CI, 0.79-0.99). In the sample of patients without diabetes, we identified 7611 cases with GA and 7608 matched controls without GA. Twenty-nine (0.4%) cases and 63 (0.8%) controls were exposed to metformin, and in multivariable regression, metformin decreased the odds of new-onset ICD coding of GA by 47% (95% CI, 0.33-0.83)., Conclusions: Metformin may hold promise as a noninvasive, alternative agent to prevent the development of GA. This finding is notable due to shortcomings in recently approved therapeutics for GA and metformin's overall ease of use and few adverse effects. Additional studies are required to explore our findings further and motivate a clinical trial.

Importance: Metformin use may protect against the development of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) based on results from observational studies. However, its potential effectiveness among patients without diabetes remains unclear., Objective: To assess the association between metformin use and the development of AMD in patients without diabetes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study used data from 2006 to 2017 in the Merative MarketScan Research Database, a nationwide insurance claims database that includes between 27 and 57 million patients in the US with primary or Medicare supplemental health insurance. Cases with AMD and controls without AMD aged 55 years or older were matched 1:1 by year, age, anemia, hypertension, region, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Then, cases and matched controls without a diagnosis of diabetes were selected. In subgroup analyses, cases with dry AMD and their matched controls were identified to explore the association between metformin use and AMD staging in patients without diabetes. Data were analyzed between March and September 2023., Exposures: Exposure to metformin in the 2 years prior to the index date (ie, date of AMD diagnosis in cases and date of a randomly selected eye examination for controls) was assessed from the claims database and categorized into quartiles based on cumulative dose (1-270, 271-600, 601-1080, and >1080 g/2 y). Exposure to other antidiabetic medications was also noted., Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds of new-onset AMD development as assessed by multivariable conditional logistic regression after adjusting for known risk factors for AMD, including female sex, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and exposures to other antidiabetic medications. Asymptotic Cochran-Armitage tests for trend were also performed., Results: We identified 231 142 patients with any AMD (mean [SD] age, 75.1 [10.4] years; 140 172 females [60.6%]) and 232 879 matched controls without AMD (mean [SD] age, 74.9 [10.5] years; 133 670 females [57.4%]), none of whom had a diagnosis of diabetes. The sample included 144 147 cases with dry AMD that were matched to 144 530 controls. In all, 2268 (1.0%) cases and 3087 controls (1.3%) were exposed to metformin in the 2 years before their index visit. After data adjustment, exposure to any metformin was associated with reduced odds of any AMD development (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87), specifically in the dosing quartiles of 1 to 270, 271 to 600, and 601 to 1080 g/2 y. Any metformin use was also associated with a reduced odds of developing dry AMD (AOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92), specifically in the dosing quartiles of 1 to 270 and 271 to 600 g/2 y. Adjusted odds ratios for any AMD and dry AMD development did not differ across the dosing quartiles. Asymptotic Cochran-Armitage tests for trend revealed 2-sided P = .51 and P = .66 for the any and dry AMD samples, respectively., Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study of a population without a diagnosis of diabetes, metformin use was associated with reduced odds of developing AMD. This association does not appear to be dose dependent. These findings provide further impetus to study metformin's usefulness in protecting against AMD in prospective clinical trials.

Introduction: The HAWK and HARRIER studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Based on the study design, brolucizumab-treated eyes adjusted to a q8w regimen because the presence of disease activity (DA) at the end of the matched loading phase (Week 16) could not subsequently extend to a q12w interval. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess subsequent DA in this subgroup to determine the potential for interval extensions during the first year of treatment., Methods: Pooled data from the brolucizumab 6 mg arms and aflibercept arms of HAWK and HARRIER were included. Presence of DA was determined by the masked investigator based on their assessment of functional and anatomical parameters measured by optical coherence tomography. DA was compared at DA assessments, conducted at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44; fluid was also assessed at the primary analysis at Week 48., Results: Fewer brolucizumab- (22.8%) than aflibercept-treated (32.2%) eyes had DA at the first DA assessment at Week 16. In eyes with investigator-identified DA at Week 16, BCVA change from baseline to Week 96 was comparable between treatment arms. Fewer brolucizumab- than aflibercept-treated eyes had DA at each subsequent DA assessment in Year 1: 31.8% vs 39.1% (Week 20), 27.3% vs 43.5% (Week 32), and 17.3% vs 31.2% (Week 44). Fewer eyes treated with brolucizumab than aflibercept had intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid: 35.3% vs 43.5% (Week 20), 55.8% vs 69.6% (Week 32), 30.0% vs 43.1% (Week 44), and 48.6% vs 68.6% (Week 48)., Conclusion: These findings indicate that, in eyes that still had DA 8 weeks after the final dose of loading phase, brolucizumab-treated eyes had improved fluid resolution and higher potential for treatment interval extension than aflibercept-treated eyes during the first year of treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Frequent antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often lead to poor compliance and suboptimal outcomes. A longer-acting agent has been a pressing unmet need until recently. Brolucizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor agent, is a single-chain antibody fragment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 8, 2019, for treating nAMD. It delivers more molecules at equivalent volumes of aflibercept, thus achieving a longer-lasting effect. We reviewed literature published in English between January 2016 and October 2022 from MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, and Google scholar using the keywords: "Brolucizumab, real-world data, intraocular inflammation (IOI), safety, and efficacy". Brolucizumab showed reduced injection frequency, better anatomic outcomes, and noninferior vision gains compared with aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER studies. However, post hoc studies on brolucizumab revealed a higher-than-expected incidence of IOI, leading to the early termination of 3 studies: MERLIN, RAPTOR, and RAVEN for nAMD, branch retinal vein occlusion, and central retinal vein occlusion, respectively. Contrastingly real-world data showed encouraging outcomes in terms of fewer IOI cases. The subsequent amendment of the treatment protocol resulted in reduced IOI. Thereafter US FDA approved its use in diabetic macular edema on June 1, 2022. Based on major studies and real-world data, this review shows that brolucizumab is effective for treating naive and refractory nAMD. The risk of IOI is acceptable and manageable, but proper preinjection screening and high-vigilance care of IOI are needed. More studies are warranted to evaluate further the incidence, best prevention, and treatment measures for IOI., Competing Interests: J.C.: Consultant/speaker—Salutaris, Erasca, Novartis, Allergan, AcuViz, Ocular Therapeutics, OD-OS. S.M.H.: Consultant/speaker—EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Allergan, Alimera Sciences, Novartis, Biogen, Bausch & Lomb and Regeneron. C.M.G.C.: speaker/consultant for and grants from—Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Allergan, Topcon, Zeiss, Boehringer Ingelheim; supported by the National Medical Research Council Singapore Open Fund Large Collaborative Grant (NMRC/LCG/004/2018). The remaining authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.)

Background and Objective: To better understand the level of agreement among retina specialists on the role of inflammation in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), and the use of 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in DME treatment, a consensus survey was drafted and disseminated to retina specialists across the United States., Materials and Methods: Using the modified Delphi method, a list of 12 consensus statements were generated by the coauthors based on short-answer responses to an initial survey. In total, 56 retina specialists completed the entire consensus survey. Except for two multiple-choice questions, there were 10 consensus statements that used a modified Likert scale to indicate their level of agreement to the statement: Agree = 3, Mostly Agree = 2, Mostly Disagree = 1, Disagree = 0. Percentage agreement and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and a consensus threshold was set at > 80% agreement for each statement., Results: Seven of 10 consensus statements using the modified Likert scale reached consensus, including those on the role of inflammation in pathophysiology of DR/DME, injection burden and patient adherence, and efficacy and safety of the FAc implant. The remaining three statements displayed high agreement with average scores > 80%, but the 95% CIs were below threshold. These included the impact of the FAc implant on DR progression, FAc as baseline therapy for DME, and the effectiveness of the steroid challenge to mitigate intraocular pressure risk after FAc use. Two multiple-choice questions focused on clinical situations in which corticosteroids would be used as baseline therapy for DME (pseudophakic eye [73%], recent stroke/myocardial infarction [66%], and pregnancy/breastfeeding [66%]) and which delivery route satisfies the steroid challenge for the FAc implant (intravitreal [100%], sub-tenon/periocular [73%], and topical [57%])., Conclusions: Physicians highly agreed on the role of inflammation in pathophysiology of DR/DME, injection burden and patient adherence, and efficacy and safety of the FAc implant. However, full consensus was not found on the impact of the FAc implant on DR progression, FAc as baseline therapy for DME, and the effectiveness of the steroid challenge to mitigate intraocular pressure risk after FAc use. [ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023;54(3):166-173.] .

Infectious endophthalmitis is a vision-threatening medical emergency that requires prompt clinical diagnosis and the initiation of treatment. However, achieving precision in endophthalmitis management remains challenging. In this review, we provide an updated overview of recent studies that are representative of the current trends in clinical microbiological techniques for infectious endophthalmitis.

Objectives: Suprachoroidal injection of triamcinolone acetonide is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for macular edema associated with uveitis. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing this treatment with best supportive care (BSC) for the management of this indication from US Medicare and commercial payer perspectives., Methods: A patient-level simulation was developed per the patient characteristics and changes in best-corrected visual acuity letter scores observed in a phase III study of triamcinolone acetonide (PEACHTREE). The wholesale acquisition cost of triamcinolone acetonide was $1650/injection; suprachoroidal injection cost was assumed at $200/injection. Healthcare costs were informed by a US claims-based analysis. Mortality risk associated with severe vision loss and blindness was modeled by applying a hazard ratio to all-cause mortality rates of the US general population. Health-related quality of life weights, obtained from a regression model fitted to the Visual Function Questionnaire-25 data from PEACHTREE, were applied based on the best-corrected visual acuity scores of both eyes. Costs (2020 US dollar) and benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated over a 10-year horizon., Results: In the base-case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing triamcinolone acetonide with BSC was $28 479 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The wholesale acquisition cost for triamcinolone acetonide for suprachoroidal use was ∼68%, ∼56%, and ∼27% below the willingness-to-pay thresholds of $150 000, $100 000, and $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. Results were robust in sensitivity and scenario analyses., Conclusions: Triamcinolone acetonide for suprachoroidal use is cost-effective compared with BSC for patients with macular edema associated with uveitis., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Macular telangiectasia Type 2 (MacTel) is a bilateral acquired retinal disease characterized by both vascular changes and atrophy of the retina. The purpose of this case series is to highlight the use of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) as a non-invasive imaging modality to distinguish atypical MacTel from other macular conditions with similar presentations. We performed a retrospective review of patients referred to our academic retinal practice with unconfirmed or misdiagnosed MacTel between July 2017 and July 2021. Patients' OCTA imaging findings were reviewed to guide the appropriate diagnosis and management of atypical MacTel. Fifteen eyes from eight patients were included in this study. Six patients were referred with previous diagnoses of either full-thickness macular hole, lamellar hole, vitreomacular traction (VMT), postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME), or diabetic macular edema (DME). Two patients were referred to us to confirm the diagnosis of MacTel. OCTA revealed telangiectatic vessels in the temporal parafovea of all 15 eyes. OCTA also highlighted previously undiagnosed subretinal neovascularization (SRNV) in seven eyes. OCTA imaging is a valuable imaging modality to distinguish MacTel from other macular conditions, whose treatment courses vary substantially. Due to its ease of use, it holds immense potential in the future as treatments for non-proliferative MacTel emerge.

Relationships between retinal disease, diet, and the gut microbiome have started to emerge. In particular, high-fat diets (HFDs) are associated with the prevalence and progression of several retinal diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). These effects are thought to be partly mediated by the gut microbiome, which modulates interactions between diet and host homeostasis. Nevertheless, the effects of HFDs on the retina and adjacent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid at the transcriptional level, independent of gut microbiota, are not well-understood. In this study, we performed the high-throughput RNA-sequencing of germ-free (GF) mice to explore the transcriptional changes induced by HFD in the RPE/choroid. After filtering and cleaning the data, 649 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, with 616 genes transcriptionally upregulated and 33 genes downregulated by HFD compared to a normal diet (ND). Enrichment analysis for gene ontology (GO) using the DEGs was performed to analyze over-represented biological processes in the RPE/choroid of GF-HFD mice relative to GF-ND mice. GO analysis revealed the upregulation of processes related to angiogenesis, immune response, and the inflammatory response. Additionally, molecular functions that were altered involved extracellular matrix (ECM) binding, ECM structural constituents, and heparin binding. This study demonstrates novel data showing that HFDs can alter RPE/choroid tissue transcription in the absence of the gut microbiome.

Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of disease across a number of therapeutic areas including retinal diseases. However, on occasion, such treatments may be relatively more expensive compared to small molecule therapies. This can restrict patient access and treatment length leading to suboptimal clinical outcomes. Several biosimilar candidates of ranibizumab and aflibercept are currently in development and the first biosimilar of ranibizumab received EMA approval in August and FDA approval in September 2021. Biosimilars are biological medicines that are highly similar to an already-approved biological medicine (reference product). The physicochemical and clinical similarity of a biosimilar is determined by a rigorous analytical and clinical program, including extensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis with phase III equivalence studies where appropriate. These phase III studies are carried out in a patient population that is representative of all of the potential approved therapeutic indications of the originator product and the most sensitive for detecting potential differences between the biosimilar and the reference product. Biosimilars have been used successfully across a wide range of therapeutic areas for the past 15 years where they have achieved substantial cost savings that can be reinvested into healthcare systems without affecting the quality of patient care. The current review provides an introduction to biosimilars with the aim of preparing retinal specialists for discussing these products with their patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Metformin is one of the most prescribed drugs in the world giving potential health benefits beyond that of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Emerging evidence suggests that it may have protective effects for retinal/posterior segment diseases including diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), inherited retinal degeneration such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and uveitis. Metformin exerts potent anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, and antioxidative effects on the retina in response to pathologic stressors. In this review, we highlight the broad mechanism of action of metformin through key preclinical studies on animal models and cell lines used to simulate human retinal disease. We then explore the sparse but promising retrospective clinical data on metformin's potential protective role in DR, AMD, POAG, and uveitis. Prospective clinical data is needed to clarify metformin's role in management of posterior segment disorders. However, given metformin's proven broad biochemical effects, favorable safety profile, relatively low cost, and promising data to date, it may represent a new therapeutic preventive and strategy for retinal diseases.

Background: Some patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have persistent intraretinal/subretinal fluid (IRF/SRF) despite being treated with anti-VEGF agents. There is limited data on efficacy of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) in these patients., Purpose: To determine anatomic and visual outcomes of eyes with nAMD treated with for persistent IRF/SRF., Methods: Retrospective series of eyes with nAMD treated initially with aflibercept (IVA, n  = 48) and bevacizumab (IVBe, n  = 10), then switched to IVBr for persistent IRF/SRF., Results: In the IVA-IVBr group, a mean of 42 days after one IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.50 to 0.49 ( p  = 0.73) and mean CSFT changed from 340 to 305 µm ( p  < 0.001); 31% of eyes had no fluid, 42% had persistent but reduced fluid, 25% had stable fluid, and 2% had increased fluid. For a subgroup of 25 eyes that completed a series of 3 IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.44 to 0.40 ( p  = 0.35) and mean CSFT changed from 325 to 277 µm ( p  = 0.001); 24% of eyes had no fluid at last follow-up, a mean of 54 days after last IVBr. In the IVBe-IVBr group, a mean of 44 days after one IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.46 to 0.40 ( p  = 0.114) and mean CSFT from 401 to 325 µm ( p  = 0.009); 30% of eyes had no fluid and 70% had persistent but reduced fluid. For a subgroup of four eyes that completed a series of three IVBr, mean logMAR changed from 0.33 to 0.35 ( p  = 0.391) and mean CSFT improved from 375 to 275 µm ( p  = 0.001); 50% of eyes had no fluid at last follow-up, a mean of 65 days after last IVBr., Conclusion: In nAMD eyes previously treated with IVA and IVBe, switching to IVBr significantly reduced persistent IRF/SRF but did not significantly affect visual outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: R.M.H. has served on an advisory board for Alimera Sciences. N.A.Y. has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Genentech, and Alimera Sciences. S.M.H. is a consultant or on the speaker’s bureau for Allergan, Graybug, Novartis, OD-OS, Clearside Biomedical, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Alimera Sciences, Spark Therapeutics and Regeneron. None of the remaining authors have any financial disclosures to report., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

Objective: To describe patient characteristics and healthcare costs associated with uveitic macular oedema (UME) in US clinical practices from a commercial payer's perspective., Methods and Analysis: The IBM MarketScan Commercial Subset (1 October 2015-31 March 2020) was used to identify patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU), with or without UME. Patients with UME at any time were further classified into subgroups of patients who received a UME diagnosis during the study period and those who received a UME diagnosis and local steroid injection (LSI) during the study period. Demographic and clinical characteristics, NIU-related treatments and healthcare costs were described for each cohort and subgroup during the most recent 12 months of continuous health plan enrolment. Healthcare costs were also described by vision status among all patients with NIU., Results: A total of 36 322 patients with NIU were identified, of whom 3 301 (9.1%) had UME and 33 021 (90.9%) had no UME. Patients with UME more frequently received NIU-related treatment compared with those without UME (64.6% vs 45.0%), particularly LSI treatment (12.5% vs 0.7%). Mean total all-cause healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were higher among patients with UME ($19 851) than patients without UME ($16 188) and were especially high among those with bilateral UME ($24 162). Further, vision loss was more commonly observed in those with UME versus those without UME (5.7% vs 2.2%) and a trend of increasing healthcare costs with increasing vision loss was observed., Conclusion: NIU is associated with substantial clinical and economic burden, particularly when UME is present., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SMH is a consultant or on the speakers bureau for Allergan; Bausch Health US; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Biogen; EyePoint Pharmaceuticals; Alimera Sciences; Spark Therapeutics and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. GJ is an employee of Bausch Health US, which funded the development and conduct of this study and manuscript. PG-S, ES, JB and AG are employees of Analysis Group, a consulting company that has provided paid consulting services to Bausch Health US. TAA is consultant for Adverum Biothechnologies; Allergan; Genentech; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Beaver-Visitec International; EyePoint Pharmaceuticals; Bausch Health US and NGM Biopharmaceuticals., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This study compared macular capillary parameters between healthy black and white subjects using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). We measured vessel density (VD) of superficial (SCP), intermediate (ICP), and deep (DCP) capillary plexuses and choriocapillaris blood flow area (BFA) of the fovea, parafovea and total 3 mm-diameter circular area centered on the fovea, as well as the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters, controlling for axial length. Black subjects had lower foveal and parafoveal VD in the SCP (p = 0.043 and p = 0.014) and the ICP (p = 0.014 and p = 0.002). In the DCP, black subjects had a trend toward lower foveal and parafoveal VD. Black subjects had decreased choriocapillaris BFA in the total 3 mm area (p = 0.011) and the parafovea (p = 0.033), larger FAZ area (p = 0.006) and perimeter (p = 0.014), and a higher capillary density in a 300 μm wide region around the FAZ (FD-300) (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in FAZ acircularity index. To our knowledge, this is the first report analyzing the three distinct retinal capillary plexuses and identifying differing baseline VD, choriocapillaris and FAZ parameters in healthy young black compared to white subjects. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and better understand racial differences in vulnerability to ocular diseases., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The relationship between retinal disease, diet, and the gut microbiome has shown increasing importance over recent years. In particular, high-fat diets (HFDs) are associated with development and progression of several retinal diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy. However, the complex, overlapping interactions between diet, gut microbiome, and retinal homeostasis are poorly understood. Using high-throughput RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of whole retinas, we compare the retinal transcriptome from germ-free (GF) mice on a regular diet (ND) and HFD to investigate transcriptomic changes without influence of gut microbiome. After correction of raw data, 53 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, of which 19 were upregulated and 34 were downregulated in GF-HFD mice. Key genes involved in retinal inflammation, angiogenesis, and RPE function were identified. Enrichment analysis revealed that the top 3 biological processes affected were regulation of blood vessel diameter, inflammatory response, and negative regulation of endopeptidase. Molecular functions altered include endopeptidase inhibitor activity, protease binding, and cysteine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity. Human and mouse pathway analysis revealed that the complement and coagulation cascades are significantly affected by HFD. This study demonstrates novel data that diet can directly modulate the retinal transcriptome independently of the gut microbiome.

Purpose: We compared the ability of ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA)., Design: Retrospective study comparing diagnostic instruments., Methods: Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and a high suspicion of NV based on clinical examination were imaged using SS-OCTA and FA at the same visit. Two separate grading sets consisting of scrambled, anonymized SS-OCTA and FA images were created. The ground truth for presence of NV was established by consensus of 2 graders with OCTA experience who did not participate in the subsequent assessment of NV in this study. The 2 anonymized image sets were graded for presence or absence of NV by 12 other graders that included 2 residents, 6 vitreoretinal fellows, and 4 vitreoretinal attending physicians. The percentage of correct grading of NV using SS-OCTA and FA was assessed for each grader and across grader training levels., Results: Forty-seven eyes from 24 patients were included in this study. Overall, the mean percentage of correct NV grading was 87.8% using SS-OCTA with B-scans and 86.2% using FA (P = .92). Assessing each grader individually, there was no statistically significant asymmetry in correct grading using SS-OCTA and FA., Conclusions: Ophthalmologists across training levels were able to identify diabetic NV with equal accuracy using SS-OCTA and FA. Based on these results, SS-OCTA may be an appropriate standalone modality for diagnosing diabetic NV., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This is a cross-sectional, prospective study of a population of black diabetic participants without diabetic retinopathy aimed to investigate optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) characteristics and correlations with systemic diseases in this population. These parameters could serve as novel biomarkers for microvascular complications; especially in black populations which are more vulnerable to diabetic microvascular complications. Linear mixed models were used to obtain OCTA mean values ± standard deviation and analyze statistical correlations to systemic diseases. Variables showing significance on univariate mixed model analysis were further analyzed with multivariate mixed models. 92 eyes of 52 black adult subjects were included. After multivariate analysis; signal strength intensity (SSI) and heart disease had statistical correlations to superficial capillary plexus vessel density in our population. SSI and smoking status had statistical correlations to deep capillary plexus vessel density in a univariate analysis that persisted in part of the imaging subset in a multivariate analysis. Hyperlipidemia; hypertension; smoking status and pack-years; diabetes duration; creatinine; glomerular filtration rate; total cholesterol; hemoglobin A1C; and albumin-to-creatinine ratio were not significantly associated with any OCTA measurement in multivariate analysis. Our findings suggest that OCTA measures may serve as valuable biomarkers to track systemic vascular functioning in diabetes mellitus in black patients.

Objective: To evaluate, in the setting of persistent diabetic macular edema, the impact that continuous fluocinolone acetonide delivery has on treatment burden, visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and intraocular pressure., Materials and Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients with persistent diabetic macular edema, previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, dexamethasone implants, or focal laser, who were subsequently treated with fluocinolone acetonide was conducted. All retinal visits were analyzed prior to fluocinolone acetonide, until the most recent follow-up visit. Primary outcomes were pre- and post-fluocinolone acetonide changes in the best-corrected visual acuity and number of treatments required for diabetic macular edema. Secondary outcomes included changes in the central retinal thickness and intraocular pressure., Results: A total of 19 eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema were included and followed for a mean (SD) of 399.3 (222.9) days. Post-fluocinolone acetonide, the mean best-corrected visual acuity improved by 0.4 ETDRS letters for all eyes ( p  = 0.895) and the central retinal thickness decreased by 34.2 µm ( p  = 0.077). After fluocinolone acetonide, the number of treatments decreased from an average of one treatment every 2.7 months to one every 6 months ( p  = 0.009). Furthermore, post-fluocinolone acetonide, 10/19 eyes (52.6%) did not require additional treatment due to a dry macula, and those who did experienced a non-statistically significant reduction of treatments, from one every 2.6 months pre-fluocinolone acetonide, to one every 2.8 months post-fluocinolone acetonide ( p  = 0.622)., Conclusions: In the setting of persistent diabetic macular edema, fluocinolone acetonide significantly reduces the therapeutic burden, while maintaining best-corrected visual acuity and improving the central retinal thickness. In patient-centered discussions, judiciously employing fluocinolone acetonide should be performed to mitigate this therapeutic burden for patients.

Purpose : To report a case of atypical keratitis caused by Rothia dentocariosa. Methods : Retrospective case review. Results : A 49 year-old woman of South Asian descent presented with a non-discrete corneal ulcer with a small overlying epithelial defect in the right eye. Cultures were obtained, a topical fluoroquinolone was continued, and a topical steroid was added. The following day, the infiltrate was noted to have worsened and developed a branching appearance. Antifungals were initiated. The culture grew Rothia dentocariosa . A series of intrastromal cefuroxime injections, followed by topical penicillin G drops, led to complete resolution within 8 weeks. A review of the literature revealed only one previously reported case of Rothia dentocariosa keratitis. Conclusions : Rothia dentocariosa may cause an atypical keratitis requiring a prolonged treatment course for resolution. In our case, a combination of cefuroxime and penicillin was effective.