Search

IntroductionAorto-left ventricular tunnel (ALVT) accounts for

Aims The Leiden Convention coronary coding system structures the large variety of coronary anatomical patterns; isolated and in congenital heart disease. It is widely used by surgeons but not by cardiologists as the system uses a surgeons' cranial view. Since thoracic surgeons and cardiologists work closely together, a coronary coding system practical for both disciplines is mandatory. To this purpose, the 'surgical' coronary coding system was adapted to an 'imaging' system, extending its applicability to different cardiac imaging techniques. Methods and results The physician takes place in the non-facing sinus of the aortic valve, oriented with the back towards the pulmonary valve, looking outward from the sinus. From this position, the right-hand sinus is sinus 1, and the left-hand sinus is sinus 2. Next, a clockwise rotation is adopted starting at sinus 1 and the encountered coronary branches described. Annotation of the normal anatomical pattern is 1R-2LCx, corresponding to the 'surgical' coding system. The 'imaging' coding system was made applicable for Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), echocardiography, and coronary angiography, thus facilitating interdisciplinary use. To assess applicability in daily clinical practice, images from different imaging modalities were annotated by cardiologists and cardiology residents and results scored. The average score upon evaluation was 87.5%, with the highest scores for CT and MRI images (average 90%). Conclusion The imaging Leiden Convention is a coronary coding system that unifies the annotation of coronary anatomy for thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and radiologists. Validation of the coding system shows it can be easily and reliably applied in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the cardiological health status and health-related quality of life after the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) in comparison with a normative reference group. Chart review and cross-sectional systematic follow-up, including echocardiography, exercise testing, and electrocardiography, were performed on all survivors of ASO for TGA between 1990 and 1995. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. A normative reference group was included. Forty-nine survivors [median age at operation 13 days, mean age at follow-up 11 ± 2 years (37/49 with intact ventricular septum] were identified. Thirty-three of 49 patients (67%) [22/33 TGA with intact ventricular septum (IVS)] participated in cross-sectional follow-up. Cumulative 10-year event-free survival was 88% and the re-intervention rate 6%. Aortic root dilatation occurred in 70% of patients; none had severe aortic regurgitation. Left ventricular function was normal. Exercise performance (85% of reference capacity, p = 0.02), maximal oxygen uptake (85%, p < 0.01) and peak heart rate (95%, p < 0.01) were decreased. Exercise electrocardiogram was normal as was rhythm status. Unfavourable outcomes on HRQOL were found for motor functioning and positive emotional functioning. Overall there were no significant differences between TGA/IVS and TGA/VSD. We conclude that at mid- to long-term follow-up after ASO, major events and re-interventions (6%) occur infrequently. Exercise capacity and maximal oxygen uptake are lower than those in a reference population, which could not be related to diminished ventricular function. Aortic root dilatation is frequent, irrespective of the anatomical subgroup. Severe aortic regurgitation or left ventricular dilatation was not found. The unfavourable health-related quality of life deserves further attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]