Search

Early identification of knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) could enable timely interventions to improve long-term outcomes. However, little is known about the change in early OA symptoms from 6 to 12 months post-ACLR. To evaluate the change over time in meeting classification criteria for early knee OA symptoms from 6 to 12 months after ACLR. Prospective cohort study. Research laboratory. Eighty-two participants aged 13 to 35 years who underwent unilateral primary ACLR. On average, participants' first and second visits were 6.2 and 12.1 months post-ACLR. Early OA symptoms were classified using generic (Luyten Original) and patient population–specific (Luyten Patient Acceptable Symptom State [PASS]) thresholds on Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales. Changes in meeting early OA criteria were compared between an initial and follow-up visit at an average of 6 and 12 months post-ACLR, respectively. Twenty-two percent of participants exhibited persistent early OA symptoms across both visits using both the Luyten Original and PASS criteria. From initial to follow-up visit, 18% to 27% had resolution of early OA symptoms, while 4% to 9% developed incident symptoms. In total, 48% to 51% had no early OA symptoms at either visit. No differences were found for change in early OA status between adults and adolescents. Nearly one-quarter of participants exhibited persistent early knee OA symptoms based on KOOS thresholds from 6 to 12 months post-ACLR. Determining if this symptom persistence predicts worse long-term outcomes could inform the need for timely interventions after ACLR. Future researchers should examine if resolving persistent symptoms in this critical window improves later outcomes. Tracking early OA symptoms over time may identify high-risk patients who could benefit from early treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Visuomotor reaction time (VMRT) is predictive of lower-extremity musculoskeletal injury and may be a modifiable anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk factor that affects the incidence of primary and secondary ACL injuries in females. However, it is unknown if females with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) experience diminished VMRT compared with their male counterparts. The purpose of this study was to compare lower-extremity VMRT (LEVMRT) between males and females with ACLR. Female (n = 40) and male (n = 20) participants who were between 4 and 12 months after primary, unilateral ACLR completed a LEVMRT task with each limb using a series of wireless light discs. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare between-group differences for LEVMRT (in milliseconds). No statistically significant sex differences were observed for LEVMRT when the ACLR limb deactivated the light discs (females = 509.5 [132.5], males = 507.0 [79.8]; p =.77) or when the ACLR limb was stabilizing while the nonsurgical limb deactivated the light discs (females = 528.5 [105.3], males = 546.0 [92.5]; p =.77). Both males and females may benefit from visual motor training to improve VMRT after ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a common impairment in individuals who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The AMI causes decreased muscle activation, which impairs muscle strength, leading to aberrant movement biomechanics. The AMI is often resistant to traditional rehabilitation techniques, which leads to persistent neuromuscular deficits following ACL reconstruction. To better treat AMI following ACL injury and ACL reconstruction, it is important to understand the specific neural pathways involved in AMI pathogenesis, as well as the changes in muscle function that may impact movement biomechanics and long-term structural alterations to joint tissue. Overall, AMI is a critical factor that limits optimal rehabilitation outcomes following ACL injury and ACL reconstruction. This review discusses the current understanding of the: (1) neural pathways involved in the AMI pathogenesis following ACL injury; (2) consequence of AMI on muscle function, joint biomechanics, and patient function; and (3) development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Finally, the authors review the evidence for interventions specifically used to target AMI following ACL injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to create a conversion equation that accurately predicts cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 relaxation times using ultrasound echo‐intensity and common participant demographics. We recruited 15 participants with a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the ages of 18 and 35 years at 1–5 years after surgery. A single investigator completed a transverse suprapatellar scan with the ACLR limb in max knee flexion to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the femoral cartilage cross‐sectional area to assess the echo‐intensity (i.e., mean gray‐scale pixel value). At a separate visit, a T2 mapping sequence with the MRI beam set to an oblique angle was used to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the cartilage cross‐sectional area on a single MRI slice to assess the T2 relaxation time. A stepwise, multiple linear regression was used to predict T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo‐intensity and common demographic variables. We created a conversion equation using the regression betas and then used an ICC and Bland–Altman plot to assess agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time. Cartilage ultrasound echo‐intensity and age significantly predicted T2 relaxation time (F = 7.33, p = 0.008, R2 = 0.55). When using the new conversion equation to estimate T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo‐intensity and age, there was strong agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time (ICC2,k = 0.84). This study provides promising preliminary data that cartilage echo‐intensity combined with age can be used as a clinically accessible tool for evaluating cartilage composition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the vertical (vGRF), anterior‐posterior (apGRF), and medial‐lateral (mlGRF) ground reaction force (GRF) profiles throughout the stance phase of gait (1) between individuals 6 to 12 months post–anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured matched controls and (2) between ACLR and individuals with differing radiographic severities of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), defined as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grades KL2, KL3, and KL4. Methods: A total of 196 participants were included in this retrospective cross‐sectional analysis. Gait biomechanics were collected from individuals 6 to 12 months post‐ACLR (n = 36), uninjured controls matched to the ACLR group (n = 36), and individuals with KL2 (n = 31), KL3 (n = 67), and KL4 osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 26). Between‐group differences in vGRF, apGRF, and mlGRF were assessed in reference to the ACLR group throughout each percentage of stance phase using a functional linear model. Results: The ACLR group demonstrated lower vGRF and apGRF in early and late stance compared to the uninjured controls, with large effects (Cohen's d range: 1.35–1.66). Conversely, the ACLR group exhibited greater vGRF (87%–90%; 4.88% body weight [BW]; d = 0.75) and apGRF (84%–94%; 2.41% BW; d = 0.79) than the KL2 group in a small portion of late stance. No differences in mlGRF profiles were observed between the ACLR and either the uninjured controls or the KL2 group. The magnitude of difference in GRF profiles between the ACLR and OA groups increased with OA disease severity. Conclusion: Individuals 6 to 12 months post‐ACLR exhibit strikingly similar GRF profiles as individuals with KL2 KOA, suggesting both patient groups may benefit from targeted interventions to address aberrant GRF profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Ultrasound imaging is a clinically feasible tool to assess femoral articular cartilage and may have utility in tracking early knee osteoarthritis development. Traditional assessment techniques focus on measurements at a single location, which can be challenging to adopt for novice raters. Objective: To introduce a novel semiautomated ultrasound segmentation technique and determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of average regional femoral articular cartilage thickness and echo intensity of a novice and expert rater. Design: Descriptive observational study. Setting: Orthopedic clinic. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen participants (mean [SD]; age 23.5 [4.6] y, height = 172.6 [9.3] cm, mass = 79.8 [15.7] kg) with a unilateral history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction participated. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measures: One rater captured anterior femoral cartilage images of the participants’ contralateral knees using a transverse suprapatellar ultrasound assessment. The total femoral cartilage cross-sectional area of each image was segmented by a novice and expert rater. A novel custom program automatically separated the cartilage segmentations into medial, lateral, and intercondylar regions to determine the crosssectional area and cartilage length. The average cartilage thickness in each region was calculated by dividing the cross-sectional area by the cartilage length. Echo intensity was calculated as the average gray-scale pixel value of each region. Two-way random effect intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement were used to determine the interrater reliability between a novice and expert rater, as well as the intrarater reliability of the novice rater. Results: The novice rater demonstrated excellent intrarater (ICC [2,k] range = .993–.997) and interrater (ICC [2,k] range = .944–.991) reliability with the expert rater of all femoral articular cartilage average thickness and echo intensity regions. Conclusions: The novel semiautomated average cartilage thickness and echo-intensity assessment is efficient, systematic, and reliable between an expert and novice rater with minimal training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of meniscal injuries at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can result in restrictions on weightbearing and range of motion in the early rehabilitative phases. What is unknown is the effect of (1) meniscal tear type and location at the time of anterior cruciate ligament injury and (2) meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR on quadriceps strength in adolescents during the late rehabilitative phase. Hypothesis: Meniscal tears involving the root and requiring repair would adversely affect quadriceps strength at 6 to 9 months postoperatively. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent ACLR at 1 of 2 research sites between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Adolescent participants were included if they were between the ages of 12 and 20 years at the time of assessment and had undergone primary unilateral ACLR in the previous 6 to 9 months. Participants were subgrouped by meniscal tear type (no tear, nonroot tear, root tear) and meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR (no treatment, meniscectomy, meniscal repair), which were confirmed via chart review. Isokinetic strength testing occurred at 60 deg/s, and quadriceps strength and quadriceps strength limb symmetry index were compared between the meniscal tear type and meniscal procedure subgroups using analysis of covariance while controlling for the effects of age, sex, and ACLR graft source. Results: An overall 236 patients were included in this analysis (109 male, 127 female; mean ± SD age, 16.0 ± 1.9 years). There were no significant differences in ACLR limb quadriceps strength based on meniscal tear type (P =.61) or meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR (P =.61), after controlling for age, biological sex, and ACLR graft source. Similarly, quadriceps strength limb symmetry index did not differ by meniscal tear type (P =.38) or meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR (P =.40). Conclusion: Meniscal tear type and treatment at the time of ACLR did not affect quadriceps strength or quadriceps strength symmetry in adolescents 6 to 9 months after ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]