Search

BackgroundHaving support from an informal carer is important for heart failure patients. Carers have the potential to improve patient self-care. At the same time, it should be acknowledged that caregiving could affect the carer negatively and cause emotional reactions of burden and stress. Dyadic (patient and informal carer) heart failure self-care interventions seek to improve patient self-care such as adherence to medical treatment, exercise training, symptom monitoring and symptom management when needed. Currently, no systematic assessment of dyadic interventions has been conducted with a focus on describing components, examining physical and delivery contexts, or determining the effect on patient and/or carer outcomes.ObjectiveTo examine the components, context, and outcomes of dyadic self-care interventions.DesignA systematic review registered in PROSPERO, following PRISMA guidelines with a narrative analysis and realist synthesis.Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using MeSH, EMTREE terms, keywords, and keyword phrases for the following concepts: dyadic, carers, heart failure and intervention. Eligible studies were original research, written in English, on dyadic self-care interventions in adult samples.Review methodsWe used a two-tiered analytic approach including both completed studies with power to determine outcomes and ongoing studies including abstracts, small pilot studies and protocols to forecast future directions.ResultsEighteen papers - 12 unique, completed intervention studies (two quasi- and ten experimental trials) from 2000 to 2016 were reviewed. Intervention components fell into three groups - education, support, and guidance. Interventions were implemented in 5 countries, across multiple settings of care, and involved 3 delivery modes - face to face, telephone or technology based. Dyadic intervention effects on cognitive, behavioral, affective and health services utilization outcomes were found within studies. However, findings across studies were inconclusive as some studies reported positive and some non-sustaining outcomes on the same variables. All the included papers had methodological limitations including insufficient sample size, mixed intervention effects and counter-intuitive outcomes.ConclusionsWe found that the evidence from dyadic interventions to promote heart failure self-care, while growing, is still very limited. Future research needs to involve advanced sample size justification, innovative solutions to increase and sustain behavior change, and use of mixed methods for capturing a more holistic picture of effects in clinical practice.

Effective healthcare requires both competent individuals and competent teams. With this recognition, health professions education is grappling with how to factor team competence into training and assessment strategies. These efforts are impeded, however, by the absence of a sophisticated understanding of the "the relationship between" competent individuals and competent teams. Using data from a constructivist grounded theory study of team-based healthcare for patients with advanced heart failure, this paper explores the relationship between individual team members' perceived goals, understandings, values and routines and the collective competence of the team. Individual interviews with index patients and their healthcare team members formed Team Sampling Units (TSUs). Thirty-seven TSUs consisting of 183 interviews were iteratively analysed for patterns of convergence and divergence in an inductive process informed by complex adaptive systems theory. Convergence and divergence were identifiable on all teams, regularly co-occurred on the same team, and involved recurring themes. Convergence and divergence had nonlinear relationships to the team's collective functioning. Convergence could foster either shared action or collective paralysis; divergence could foster problematic incoherence or productive disruption. These findings advance our understanding of the complex relationship between the individual and the collective on a healthcare team, and they challenge conventional narratives of healthcare teamwork which derive largely from acute care settings and emphasize the importance of common goals and shared mental models. Complex adaptive systems theory helps us to understand the implications of these insights for healthcare teams' delivery of care for the complex, chronically ill.

The 20-item Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-care (CACHS) was developed and tested in a series of preliminary studies providing evidence for the validity of this instrument in Canada. The purpose of this study was to assess the initial psychometric testing of a translated version of the 20-item CACHS in a European sample using classical test theory and item response theory (IRT) methods. This study is a preplanned subanalysis of data from a multisite, descriptive study of caregivers (n = 277; mean age, 52.7 years; 70.4% female) of Italian patients with heart failure. The CACHS-Italian version demonstrated adequate validity and reliability using classical test theory methods. Using IRT methods, test information function was unimodal with more item information in the negative versus positive regions of the latent trait. Most items displayed moderate to high discrimination with acceptable levels of difficulty. Differential item functioning, which determines whether caregivers from different groups with equal amounts of the latent trait have different expected item responses, differed based on caregivers' biological sex as did the IRT discrimination "α" and difficulty "β" parameters. Overall, the CACHS-Italian version demonstrated similar psychometric properties and excellent reliability as demonstrated in the Canadian sample. However, unlike the original Canadian English version, the CACHS-Italian version showed significant nonuniform differential item functioning, discrimination, and difficulty based on caregivers' biological sex. Ongoing examination of the CACHS-Italian version, particularly in men, is needed as is further linguistic validation using the Canadian CACHS-English version in non–North American English-speaking countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale, aim, and objectives: Heart failure (HF) clinics are highly effective, yet not optimally utilized. A realist review was performed to identify contexts (eg, health system characteristics, clinic capacity, and siting) and underlying mechanisms (eg, referring provider knowledge of clinics and referral criteria, barriers in disadvantaged patients) that influence utilization (provider referral [ie, of all appropriate and no inappropriate patients] and access [ie, patient attends ≥1 visit]) of HF clinics. Methods: Following an initial scoping search and field observation in a HF clinic, we developed an initial program theory in conjunction with our expert panel, which included patient partners. Then, a literature search of seven databases was searched from inception to December 2019, including Medline; Grey literature was also searched. Studies of any design or editorials were included; studies regarding access to cardiac rehabilitation, or a single specialist for example, were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts, and then full‐texts. Relevant data from included articles were used to refine the program theory. Results: A total of 29 papers from five countries (three regions) were included. There was limited information to support or refute many elements of our initial program theory (eg, referring provider knowledge/beliefs, clinic inclusion/exclusion criteria), but refinements were made (eg, specialized care provided in each clinic, lack of patient encouragement). Lack of capacity, geography, and funding arrangements were identified as contextual factors, explaining a range of mechanistic processes, including patient clinical characteristics and social determinants of health as well as clinic characteristics that help to explain inappropriate and low use of HF clinics (outcome). Conclusion: Given the burden of HF and benefit of HF clinics, more research is needed to understand, and hence overcome sub‐optimal use of HF clinics. In particular, an understanding from the perspective of referring providers is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients considering a ventricular assist device for destination therapy (DT-VAD) face a complex decision. Patient decision aids (PDAs) facilitate informed, shared decision-making. Purpose: The primary purpose of our quality improvement (QI) initiative was to produce a revised/adapted version of a USA-developed DT-VAD-PDA for use in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Using mixed methods, we interviewed patients with DT-VADs, caregivers, and healthcare providers (HCPs; N = 18). Participants also completed an acceptability questionnaire on the USA-DT-VAD-PDA. Results: Participants (N = 3 patients; 2 caregivers; 13 HCPs) indicated that the USA-DT-VAD-PDA included critically important information for patients and caregivers, and was a valuable patient teaching tool for HCPs. The interviews also elicited insightful recommendations for content adaptions and implementation strategies. Conclusions: The outcome of this QI project was an evidence-informed DT-VAD-PDA that has the potential for HCPs to leverage when facilitating an informed, shared decision-making process for these patients within the Canadian context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Canadian home care population is growing and cardio-respiratory chronic care needs are more prevalent. Specialized programs for self-management support are usually initiated during an acute episode or upon discharge from hospital. These hospital and community-based outpatient programs are typically delivered by cardiac and respiratory disease management specialists and clinics, and only a small proportion of patients living with cardio-respiratory disorders have access to these. Self-management support provided in settings other than the home fail to account for challenges unique to the patient's home environment where self-management is practised. The DIVERT-CARE Intervention is a scalable, home-based, multi-component intervention to increase health literacy, optimize self-management behaviours, strengthen community supports, and increase co-management between home care and primary care providers. We describe the DIVERT-CARE Intervention components in detail, including the prerequisite nurse training and education, case-finding, and inter-professional self-management supports. This paper is relevant for the advancement of community nursing practice to adequately support the needs of home care patients with heart failure and COPD-related cardiorespiratory symptoms and promote clinical practice consistency across the healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]