Search

Abstract Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) is a primary mechanism-of-action of monoclonal antibody (mAb) immunotherapies used to treat haematological cancers, including rituximab and daratumumab. However, mAb efficacy may be limited by reduced bioavailability of complement C1q – which activates the complement classical pathway following interactions with mAb-opsonised target cells. C1q is secreted by phagocytes upon recruitment to sites of muscle damage to facilitate muscular repair, hence we hypothesised that muscle damaging exercise may increase C1q ‘spill-over’ into blood. Additionally, other complement proteins (e.g., C1s) have been reported to increase following ultra-endurance and resistance exercise. Taken together, we hypothesised that muscle damaging exercise could be harnessed to enhance mAb-mediated CDC. In this study, n = 8 healthy males (28 ± 5-years) completed two 45-minute treadmill running protocols: (1) a flat running protocol at a speed 15% above anaerobic threshold, and (2) a downhill running protocol (− 10% slope) at the same speed. Blood samples were collected before, immediately after, and 1-hour, 24-hours, 2-days, and 4-days after exercise. Isolated serum was assessed for C1q by ELISA, and used to measure mAb (rituximab, daratumumab) mediated CDC against two haematological cancer cell lines (Raji, RPMI-8226) in vitro. Isolated plasma was assessed for markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]), and muscle damage (creatine kinase [CK]) by turbidimetry. C1q and CDC activity were not different between running protocols and did not change over time (p > 0.05). Significantly greater perceived muscle soreness (p

BackgroundChronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) typically presents with asymptomatic, early-stage disease that is monitored until disease progression (‘treatment-naïve’ CLL). The objective of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and preliminary safety of an exercise program in treatment-naïve CLL. We also sought to preliminarily assess the impact of the exercise program on disease activity, as it has been proposed that exercise training may reduce disease outgrowth in treatment-naïve CLL.MethodsA total of 40 treatment-naïve CLL patients were recruited into this randomised-controlled pilot study, and after screening, n = 28 were randomised into a 16-week, home-based, partially supervised, personalised, progressive exercise intervention (n = 14: mean ± SD: age = 62 ± 12 years) or 16 weeks of usual care, control group (n = 14: mean ± SD: age = 61 ± 10 years). The primary outcome measures were safety (number and severity of adverse events) and feasibility (uptake, retention, and adherence to the trial). Disease activity (CD5+/CD19+ CLL cells clonally restricted to kappa or lambda) and other immune cell phenotypes, with a principal focus on T cells, were measured by flow cytometry. Other secondary outcomes included DEXA-derived body composition, cardiorespiratory and functional fitness, resting cardiovascular measures.ResultsTrial uptake was 40%, and the overall retention rate was 86%, with 79% of the exercise group and 93% of the control group completing the trial. Adherence to the exercise intervention was 92 ± 8%. One serious adverse event was reported unrelated to the trial, and one adverse event related to the trial was reported. The exercise intervention elicited a 2% increase in DEXA-derived lean mass in the exercise group compared with a 0.4% decrease in the control group (p = 0.01). No between-group differences were observed over time for whole-body mass, BMI, bone mineral density, body fat, blood pressure resting heart rate, or measures of cardiorespiratory or functional fitness (all p > 0.05). No between-group differences were observed over time for clonal CLL cells and CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell subsets (all p > 0.05).ConclusionThe exercise training program used in this study was feasible in people with treatment-naïve CLL who passed pre-trial screening, and we preliminarily conclude that the exercise training program was safe and also resulted in an increase in lean mass.Clinical trial registrationhttps://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN55166064, identifier ISRCTN 55166064.

Multiple myeloma is a haematological cancer characterised by the accumulation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow and is commonly treated with daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody immunotherapy. Daratumumab often fails to induce stringent complete responses, due in part to resistance to antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) exerted by natural killer (NK)-cells and monocytes. Exercise bouts undertaken by healthy people induce lymphocytosis in blood, including to NK-cells and B-cells, but the effects of exercise are unknown in myeloma patients. In addition, whether exercise mobilises plasma cells has not been adequately investigated, and as such the potential impact of exercise on daratumumab treatment is unclear. In this exploratory pilot study, n = 16 smouldering multiple myeloma participants enrolled and n = 9 completed the study which comprised a bout of cycling 15% above anaerobic threshold for ∼30-min, with blood samples collected pre-, immediately post-, and 30-min post-exercise. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from blood samples and incubated with the RPMI-8226 plasmacytoma cell line, with or without the presence of daratumumab to determine specific lysis using a calcein-release assay. Daratumumab-mediated cell lysis increased from 18.8% to 23.2% pre- to post-exercise, respectively (p 0.05). Notably, we observed a 305% increase in NK-cells expressing CD38, the daratumumab target antigen, which might render NK-cells more susceptible to daratumumab-mediated fratricide – whereby NK-cells initiate ADCC against daratumumab-bound NK-cells. In conclusion, exercise modestly improved the efficacy of daratumumab-mediated ADCC in vitro. However, plasma cells were largely unchanged, and NK-cells expressing CD38 – the daratumumab target antigen – increased in blood. Future research should consider the optimal timings of exercise during daratumumab treatment in myeloma to avert exacerbation of daratumumab-mediated NK-cell lysis.

Abstract The premise of research in human physiology is to explore a multifaceted system whilst identifying one or a few outcomes of interest. Therefore, the control of potentially confounding variables requires careful thought regarding the extent of control and complexity of standardisation. One common factor to control prior to testing is diet, as food and fluid provision may deviate from participants’ habitual diets, yet a self‐report and replication method can be flawed by under‐reporting. Researchers may also need to consider standardisation of physical activity, whether it be through familiarisation trials, wash‐out periods, or guidance on levels of physical activity to be achieved before trials. In terms of pharmacological agents, the ethical implications of standardisation require researchers to carefully consider how medications, caffeine consumption and oral contraceptive prescriptions may affect the study. For research in females, it should be considered whether standardisation between‐ or within‐participants in regards to menstrual cycle phase is most relevant. The timing of measurements relative to various other daily events is relevant to all physiological research and so it can be important to standardise when measurements are made. This review summarises the areas of standardisation which we hope will be considered useful to anyone involved in human physiology research, including when and how one can apply standardisation to various contexts.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are standard care for many B-cell haematological cancers. The modes of action for these mAbs include: induction of cancer cell lysis by activating Fcγ-receptors on innate immune cells; opsonising target cells for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or phagocytosis, and/or triggering the classical complement pathway; the simultaneous binding of cancer cells with T-cells to create an immune synapse and activate perforin-mediated T-cell cytotoxicity against cancer cells; blockade of immune checkpoints to facilitate T-cell cytotoxicity against immunogenic cancer cell clones; and direct delivery of cytotoxic agents via internalisation of mAbs by target cells. While treatment regimens comprising mAb therapy can lead to durable anti-cancer responses, disease relapse is common due to failure of mAb therapy to eradicate minimal residual disease. Factors that limit mAb efficacy include: suboptimal effector cell frequencies, overt immune exhaustion and/or immune anergy, and survival of diffusely spread tumour cells in different stromal niches. In this review, we discuss how immunomodulatory changes arising from exposure to structured bouts of acute exercise might improve mAb treatment efficacy by augmenting (i) antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, (ii) antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, (iii) complement-dependent cytotoxicity, (iv) T-cell cytotoxicity, and (v) direct delivery of cytotoxic agents.