1. Comparison of frailty instruments for predicting mortality and prolon ged hospitalization in acute coronary syndrome patients.
- Author
-
Anne Langsted, Jocelyne Benatar, Andrew Kerr, Katherine Bloomfield, Gerry Devlin, Alexander Sasse, David Smythe, Andrew To, Harvey White, Gerrard Wilkins, and Ralph Stewart
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative strengths of 3 frailty assessment instruments for predicting mortality and prolonged hospitalization in acute coronary syndrome patients.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingAcute cardiac care units in New Zealand.Participants1174 patients >70 years of age hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome.InterventionsThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and Fried Criteria (Fried), were completed during hospital admission following an acute coronary syndrome when the patient was clinically stable.Primary and secondary outcome measuresAll-cause mortality over the next ~5 years and hospitalization for >10 days in the next year determined from national administrative data.ResultsDuring median follow-up of 5.1 years there were 353 deaths. Harrell's C-statistic for mortality for EFS was 0.663, Fried 0.648 and CFS 0.640 (p10 days (n = 267, 22%) were EFS 0.649, Fried 0.628, and CFS 0.584 (pConclusionIn older patients assessed following an acute coronary syndrome the EFS discriminated the risk of all cause mortality and prolonged hospitalization better than the CFS and Fried tests, and improved risk discrimination when added to clinical risk scores.
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF