Search

Supplemental Figure 3 shows the distributions in plasma from controls and PDAC patients by stage of disease and standardized copy numbers of all MDMs other than HOXA1 and PRKCB.

Supplemental Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients in Primary and Metastatic Tissue MDM Concordance Study

Supplementary Tables and Figure Legends

Supplemental Figure 1: The average level of all MDMs assayed from DNA extracted from primary and metastatic CRC tissues was not significantly different in Primary and Metastatic Tissue MDM Concordance Study. (A) Average level of all MDMs in metachronous metastatic CRC and the corresponding primary CRC as well as in synchronous metastatic CRC and the corresponding primary CRC; (B) The difference of average level of all MDMs in paired primary and metachronous metastatic CRC as well as in paired primary and synchronous metastatic CRC. MDM: methylated DNA marker; CRC: colorectal cancer.

Purpose:We have previously identified tissue methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this case–control study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of plasma MDMs for PDAC.Experimental Design:Thirteen MDMs (GRIN2D, CD1D, ZNF781, FER1L4, RYR2, CLEC11A, AK055957, LRRC4, GH05J042948, HOXA1, PRKCB, SHISA9, and NTRK3) were identified on the basis of selection criteria applied to results of prior tissue experiments and assays were optimized in plasma. Next, 340 plasma samples (170 PDAC cases and 170 controls) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal method. Initially, 120 advanced-stage PDAC cases and 120 healthy controls were used to train a prediction algorithm at 97.5% specificity using random forest modeling. Subsequently, the locked algorithm derived from the training set was applied to an independent blinded test set of 50 early-stage PDAC cases and 50 controls. Finally, data from all 340 patients were combined, and cross-validated.Results:The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.93 (0.89–0.96) for the MDM panel alone, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.96) for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) alone, and 0.99 (0.98–1) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel. In the test set of early-stage PDAC, the AUC for MDMs alone was 0.84 (0.76–0.92), CA19-9 alone was 0.87 (0.79–0.94), and combined MDM-CA19-9 panel was 0.90 (0.84–0.97) significantly better compared with either MDMs alone or CA19-9 alone (P = 0.0382 and 0.0490, respectively). At a preset specificity of 97.5%, the sensitivity for the combined panel in the test set was 80% (28%–99%) for stage I disease and 82% (68%–92%) for stage II disease. Using the combined datasets, the cross-validated AUC was 0.9 (0.86–0.94) for the MDM panel alone and 0.89 for CA19-9 alone (0.84–0.93) versus 0.97 (0.94–0.99) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel (P ≤ 0.0001). Overall, cross-validated sensitivity of MDM-CA19-9 panel was 92% (83%–98%), with an observed specificity of 92% at the preset specificity of 97.5%.Conclusions:Plasma MDMs in combination with CA19-9 detect PDAC with significantly higher accuracy compared with either biomarker individually.

Supplemental Figure 2: The importance of individual MDMs and CEA in contribution to the performance of random forest model in classification of early CRC from healthy control in MDM Plasma CRC Early Primary Detection Study. MDM: methylated DNA marker; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CRC: colorectal cancer.

Supplemental Figure 4: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in nanograms per milliliter assayed from 10 microliters serum in the Early Detection experiment are 1.5 times higher than values assayed from 10 microliters of plasma in the Surveillance experiment. Blue reference line marks median values in serum for normal control patients and orange line marks median serum value for stage IV colorectal cancer cases. CEA values in the surveillance samples were re-scaled to allow application of the model derived in the Early Detection analysis to the Surveillance data set.

Purpose:We aimed to assess the concordance of colorectal cancer–associated methylated DNA markers (MDM) in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer for feasibility in detection of distantly recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer in plasma.Experimental Design:A panel of previously discovered colorectal cancer–associated MDMs was selected. MDMs from primary and paired metastatic colorectal cancer tissue were assayed with quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Plasma MDMs were measured blindly by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs in archival plasma samples from primary colorectal cancer cases. This algorithm was validated in prospectively collected plasma samples from recurrent colorectal cancer cases. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).Results:Of the 14 selected MDMs, the concordance between primary and metastatic tissue was considered moderate or higher for 12 MDMs (86%). At a preset specificity of 95% (91%–98%), a panel of 13 MDMs, in plasma from 97 colorectal cancer cases and 200 controls, detected stage IV colorectal cancer with 100% (80%–100%) sensitivity and all stages of colorectal cancer with an AUC of 0.91 (0.87–0.95), significantly higher than carcinoembryonic antigen [AUC, 0.72 (0.65–0.79)]. This panel, in plasma from 40 cases and 60 healthy controls, detected recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer with 90% (76%–97%) sensitivity, 90% (79%–96%) specificity, and an AUC of 0.96 (0.92–1.00). The panel was positive in 0.30 (0.19–0.43) of 60 patients with no evidence of disease in post-operative patients with colorectal cancer.Conclusions:Plasma assay of novel colorectal cancer–associated MDMs can reliably detect both primary colorectal cancer and distantly recurrent colorectal cancer with promising accuracy.

Purpose: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Accurate and affordable noninvasive detection methods have potential value for screening and surveillance. Herein, we identify novel methylated DNA markers (MDM) for gastric adenocarcinoma, validate their discrimination for gastric adenocarcinoma in tissues from geographically separate cohorts, explore marker acquisition through the oncogenic cascade, and describe distributions of candidate MDMs in plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls.Experimental Design: Following discovery by unbiased whole-methylome sequencing, candidate MDMs were validated by blinded methylation-specific PCR in archival case–control tissues from U.S. and South Korean patients. Top MDMs were then assayed by an analytically sensitive method (quantitative real-time allele-specific target and signal amplification) in a blinded pilot study on archival plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls.Results: Whole-methylome discovery yielded novel and highly discriminant candidate MDMs. In tissue, a panel of candidate MDMs detected gastric adenocarcinoma in 92% to 100% of U.S. and South Korean cohorts at 100% specificity. Levels of most MDMs increased progressively from normal mucosa through metaplasia, adenoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma with variation in points of greatest marker acquisition. In plasma, a 3-marker panel (ELMO1, ZNF569, C13orf18) detected 86% (95% CI, 71–95) of gastric adenocarcinomas at 95% specificity.Conclusions: Novel MDMs appear to accurately discriminate gastric adenocarcinoma from normal controls in both tissue and plasma. The point of aberrant methylation during oncogenesis varies by MDM, which may have relevance to marker selection in clinical applications. Further exploration of these MDMs for gastric adenocarcinoma screening and surveillance is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5724–34. ©2018 AACR.

Supplemental Figure 1: Quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification (QuARTS) assay.

Supplemental Figure 2. Box plots of methylated DNA marker levels in various types of cancers were made from publically available hybridization array data from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Purpose:The burden of esophageal cancer continues to rise, and noninvasive screening tools are needed. Methylated DNA markers (MDM) assayed from plasma show promise in detection of other cancers. For esophageal cancer detection, we aimed to discover and validate MDMs in tissue, and determine their feasibility when assayed from plasma.Experimental Design:Whole-methylome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 37 tissues (28 EC; 9 normal esophagus) and 8 buffy coat samples. Top MDMs were validated by methylation specific PCR on tissue from 76 EC (41 adeno, 35 squamous cell) and 17 normal esophagus. Quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification was used to assay MDMs in plasma from 183 patients (85 EC, 98 controls). Recursive partitioning (rPART) identified MDM combinations predictive of esophageal cancer. Validation was performed in silico by bootstrapping.Results:From discovery, 23 candidate MDMs were selected for independent tissue validation; median area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for individual MDMs was 0.93. Among 12 MDMs advanced to plasma testing, rPART modeling selected a 5 MDM panel (FER1L4, ZNF671, ST8SIA1, TBX15, ARHGEF4) which achieved an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89–0.96) on best-fit and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75–0.88) on cross-validation. At 91% specificity, the panel detected 74% of esophageal cancer overall, and 43%, 64%, 77%, and 92% of stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Discrimination was not affected by age, sex, smoking, or body mass index.Conclusions:Novel MDMs assayed from plasma detect esophageal cancer with moderate accuracy. Further optimization and clinical testing are warranted.

Supplemental Table 2. Intraclass correlation coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) between primary colorectal cancer and metastatic disease, either synchronous or metachronous indicate concordance of methylated DNA marker levels in total DNA extracted from these tissues

Supplemental Figure 5: No difference in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) was seen in a comparison of available clinical serum versus experimental plasma samples from colorectal cancer patients with no evidence of disease (NED) or with recurrent & metastatic disease. Clinical serum measurements of CEA were not available for controls.

Supplemental Table 1: Discrimination for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) from normal gastric mucosa by the top 22 methylated DNA marker candidates in Discovery and Technical Validation Sets. Supplemental Table 2: Function of Genes Containing Differentially Methylated Regions Identified as Targets for Candidate Markers Supplemental Table 3: Covariate Effects on Tissue Levels of Methylated DNA Marker Candidates (Data shown represent p-values).

Supplemental Figure 3: The distribution of MDMs in MDM Plasma CRC Early Primary Detection Study (i.e., training data) and in MDM Plasma CRC Surveillance Study (i.e., Recurrence data). There are reference lines relative to the healthy controls (blue line) and stage IV cancers (orange line). These reference lines are helpful in assessing drifts between patient populations.

Supplemental Table 3 Performance of MDMs in differentiating recurrent CRC from healthy controls in MDM Plasma CRC Surveillance Study. MDM: methylated DNA marker; CRC: colorectal cancer; AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: confidence interval; NED: no radiographic evidence of disease.

Background and Aims We previously identified a 5 methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel for the detection of nonendoscopic Barrett’s esophagus (BE). In this study, we aimed to recalibrate the performance of the 5 MDM panel using a simplified assay in a training cohort, validate the panel in an independent test cohort, and explore the accuracy of an MDM panel with only 3 markers. Methods Participants were recruited from 3 medical centers. The sponge on a string device (EsophaCap; CapNostics, Concord, NC, USA) was swallowed and withdrawn, followed by endoscopy, in BE cases and control subjects. A 5 MDM panel was blindly assayed using a simplified assay. Random forest modeling analysis was performed, in silico cross-validated in the training set, and then locked down, before test set analysis. Results The training set had 199 patients: 110 BE cases and 89 control subjects, and the test set had 89 patients: 60 BE cases and 29 control subjects. Sensitivity of the 5 MDM panel for BE diagnosis was 93% at 90% specificity in the training set and 93% at 93% specificity in the test set. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were .96 and .97 in the training and test sets, respectively. Model accuracy was not influenced by age, sex, or smoking history. Multiple 3 MDM panels achieved similar accuracy. Conclusions A 5 MDM panel for BE is highly accurate in training and test sets in a blinded multisite case-control analysis using a simplified assay. This panel may be reduced to only 3 MDMs in the future. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT 02560623.)

Purpose:We have previously identified tissue methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this case–control study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of plasma MDMs for PDAC.Experimental Design:Thirteen MDMs (GRIN2D, CD1D, ZNF781, FER1L4, RYR2, CLEC11A, AK055957, LRRC4, GH05J042948, HOXA1, PRKCB, SHISA9, and NTRK3) were identified on the basis of selection criteria applied to results of prior tissue experiments and assays were optimized in plasma. Next, 340 plasma samples (170 PDAC cases and 170 controls) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal method. Initially, 120 advanced-stage PDAC cases and 120 healthy controls were used to train a prediction algorithm at 97.5% specificity using random forest modeling. Subsequently, the locked algorithm derived from the training set was applied to an independent blinded test set of 50 early-stage PDAC cases and 50 controls. Finally, data from all 340 patients were combined, and cross-validated.Results:The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.93 (0.89–0.96) for the MDM panel alone, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.96) for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) alone, and 0.99 (0.98–1) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel. In the test set of early-stage PDAC, the AUC for MDMs alone was 0.84 (0.76–0.92), CA19-9 alone was 0.87 (0.79–0.94), and combined MDM-CA19-9 panel was 0.90 (0.84–0.97) significantly better compared with either MDMs alone or CA19-9 alone (P = 0.0382 and 0.0490, respectively). At a preset specificity of 97.5%, the sensitivity for the combined panel in the test set was 80% (28%–99%) for stage I disease and 82% (68%–92%) for stage II disease. Using the combined datasets, the cross-validated AUC was 0.9 (0.86–0.94) for the MDM panel alone and 0.89 for CA19-9 alone (0.84–0.93) versus 0.97 (0.94–0.99) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel (P ≤ 0.0001). Overall, cross-validated sensitivity of MDM-CA19-9 panel was 92% (83%–98%), with an observed specificity of 92% at the preset specificity of 97.5%.Conclusions:Plasma MDMs in combination with CA19-9 detect PDAC with significantly higher accuracy compared with either biomarker individually.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the concordance of colorectal cancer–associated methylated DNA markers (MDM) in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer for feasibility in detection of distantly recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer in plasma. Experimental Design: A panel of previously discovered colorectal cancer–associated MDMs was selected. MDMs from primary and paired metastatic colorectal cancer tissue were assayed with quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Plasma MDMs were measured blindly by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs in archival plasma samples from primary colorectal cancer cases. This algorithm was validated in prospectively collected plasma samples from recurrent colorectal cancer cases. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Of the 14 selected MDMs, the concordance between primary and metastatic tissue was considered moderate or higher for 12 MDMs (86%). At a preset specificity of 95% (91%–98%), a panel of 13 MDMs, in plasma from 97 colorectal cancer cases and 200 controls, detected stage IV colorectal cancer with 100% (80%–100%) sensitivity and all stages of colorectal cancer with an AUC of 0.91 (0.87–0.95), significantly higher than carcinoembryonic antigen [AUC, 0.72 (0.65–0.79)]. This panel, in plasma from 40 cases and 60 healthy controls, detected recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer with 90% (76%–97%) sensitivity, 90% (79%–96%) specificity, and an AUC of 0.96 (0.92–1.00). The panel was positive in 0.30 (0.19–0.43) of 60 patients with no evidence of disease in post-operative patients with colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Plasma assay of novel colorectal cancer–associated MDMs can reliably detect both primary colorectal cancer and distantly recurrent colorectal cancer with promising accuracy.

Background: Emerging colorectal cancer trends demonstrate increased incidence and mortality in younger populations, prompting consideration of average-risk colorectal cancer screening initiation at age 45 versus 50 years. However, screening test performance characteristics in adults 45–49 years have been minimally described. To inform the biologic rationale for multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening in younger patients, we analyzed and compared tissue levels of methylation (BMP3, NDRG4) and mutation (KRAS) markers included in the FDA-approved, mt-sDNA assay (Cologuard; Exact Sciences Corporation). Methods: Within 40–44, 45–49, and 50–64 year age groups, archived colorectal tissue specimens were identified for 211 sporadic colorectal cancer cases, 123 advanced precancerous lesions (APLs; adenomas >1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, ≥25% villous morphology, or sessile serrated polyp; 45–49 and 50–64 age groups only), and 204 histologically normal controls. Following DNA extraction, KRAS, BMP3, and NDRG4 were quantified using QuARTS assays, relative to ACTB (reference gene). Results: None of the molecular marker concentrations were significantly associated with age (P > 0.05 for all comparisons), with the exception of NDRG4 concentration in APL samples (higher in older vs. younger cases; P = 0.008). However, NDRG4 levels were also statistically higher in APL case versus normal control samples in both the 45–49 (P < 0.0001) and 50–64 (P < 0.0001) year age groups. Conclusions: Overall, these findings support the potential for earlier onset of average-risk colorectal cancer screening with the mt-sDNA assay. Impact: These novel data address an identified knowledge gap and strengthen the biologic basis for earlier-onset, average-risk screening with the mt-sDNA assay.

Background: A multi-analyte blood test has the potential to maximize performance for early detection across different cancer stages and types. Improvements in early-stage cancer detection might be achieved using multi-component tests with high sensitivities and specificities. We recently performed a large feasibility study to assess the performance of 4 biomarkers (aneuploidy, methylation, mutation, and protein) for the detection of cancers from up to 15 organ sites. Specifically, a training and validation set was tested for 3 biomarkers (aneuploidy, methylation, and protein) and the performance was subsequently confirmed in an independent testing set. Methods: We have now further improved the performance of a 4-marker cancer detection blood test by fine-tuning the respective marker calling models and thresholds, exploring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer detection, and developing an overarching Machine Learning (ML) cancer classifier. To improve the mutation detection, we tested (in triplicate) 200 plasma and buffy samples from young, non-cancer subjects and mutant DNA from cell lines to develop an ML-based mutation calling algorithm. This caller was validated on 186 samples and tested on an independent set of 1388 cancer and non-cancer samples. The calling of cancer-associated DNA methylation events was refined by performing training, validation, and testing across different studies. We also explored models for methylation detection based solely on distribution of methylation signal observed in non-cancer samples. Free and total PSA were investigated as markers for prostate cancer detection by including clinically relevant Gleason scores in the development of the protein-based cancer calling algorithm. Results: In the previous analysis the combination of mutation, aneuploidy, methylation, and protein biomarkers resulted in an overall sensitivity of 61.0% (95% CI: 56.9%-65.0) at a specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.1 – 99.4%). We will present the added performance benefit of ML-based mutation variant calling. PSA derived features were evaluated with the goal of increasing the detectability of high-grade prostate cancers while minimizing the detection of indolent cancers. Lastly, we compared the Boolean logic-based 4-biomarker combination algorithm used in the previous analysis with an ML-based cancer classifier. The results of the modeling, applied to the testing set, will be shared. Conclusions: In summary, improvements in cancer detection performance may be achieved by optimizing each biomarker calling algorithm as well as overarching cancer classifier. When combining these improvements, we believe that a single blood test will provide robust sensitivity for the detection of several cancer types, particularly for earlier-stage disease in real world settings. Citation Format: Vladimir Gianullin, Leonardo Hagmann, Kevin Arvai, Amira Djebbari, Christopher L. Nobles, Larson Hogstrom, Mael Manesse, Vuna Fa, Fanglei Zhuang, Xi Chen, Viatcheslav E. Katerov, Jorge Garces, Hatim T. Allawi, Abigail McElhinny, Frank Diehl, Gustavo C Cerqueira. Improved sensitivity of a multi-analyte early detection test based on mutation, methylation, aneuploidy, and protein biomarkers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P041.

Background: A multi-analyte blood test has the potential to maximize performance for early detection across different cancer stages and types. Improvements in early-stage cancer detection might be achieved using multi-component tests with high sensitivities and specificities. We recently performed a large feasibility study to assess the performance of 4 biomarkers (aneuploidy, methylation, mutation, and protein) for the detection of cancers from up to 15 organ sites. Specifically, a training and validation set was tested for 3 biomarkers (aneuploidy, methylation, and protein) and the performance was subsequently confirmed in an independent testing set. Methods: We have now further improved the performance of a 4-marker cancer detection blood test by fine-tuning the respective marker calling models and thresholds, exploring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer detection, and developing an overarching Machine Learning (ML) cancer classifier. To improve the mutation detection, we tested (in triplicate) 200 plasma and buffy samples from young, non-cancer subjects and mutant DNA from cell lines to develop an ML-based mutation calling algorithm. This caller was validated on 186 samples and tested on an independent set of 1388 cancer and non-cancer samples. The calling of cancer-associated DNA methylation events was refined by performing training, validation, and testing across different studies. We also explored models for methylation detection based solely on distribution of methylation signal observed in non-cancer samples. Free and total PSA were investigated as markers for prostate cancer detection by including clinically relevant Gleason scores in the development of the protein-based cancer calling algorithm. Results: In the previous analysis the combination of mutation, aneuploidy, methylation, and protein biomarkers resulted in an overall sensitivity of 61.0% (95% CI: 56.9%-65.0) at a specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.1 – 99.4%). We will present the added performance benefit of ML-based mutation variant calling. PSA derived features were evaluated with the goal of increasing the detectability of high-grade prostate cancers while minimizing the detection of indolent cancers. Lastly, we compared the Boolean logic-based 4-biomarker combination algorithm used in the previous analysis with an ML-based cancer classifier. The results of the modeling, applied to the testing set, will be shared. Conclusions: In summary, improvements in cancer detection performance may be achieved by optimizing each biomarker calling algorithm as well as overarching cancer classifier. When combining these improvements, we believe that a single blood test will provide robust sensitivity for the detection of several cancer types, particularly for earlier-stage disease in real world settings. Citation Format: Vladimir Gianullin, Leonardo Hagmann, Kevin Arvai, Amira Djebbari, Christopher L. Nobles, Larson Hogstrom, Mael Manesse, Vuna Fa, Fanglei Zhuang, Xi Chen, Viatcheslav E. Katerov, Jorge Garces, Hatim T. Allawi, Abigail McElhinny, Frank Diehl, Gustavo C Cerqueira. Improved sensitivity of a multi-analyte early detection test based on mutation, methylation, aneuploidy, and protein biomarkers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr IA023.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) may be precancerous. Those likely to harbor high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer (PC) are targets for surgical resection. Current algorithms to predict advanced neoplasia (HGD/PC) in PCLs lack diagnostic accuracy. In pancreatic tissue and cystfluid (CF) from PCLs, we sought to identify and validate novel methylated DNA markers (MDMs) that discriminate HGD/PC from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or no dysplasia (ND). METHODS: From an unbiased whole-methylome discovery approach using predefined selection criteria followed by multistep validation on case (HGD or PC) and control (ND or LGD) tissues, we identified discriminant MDMs. Top candidate MDMs were then assayed by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction on archival CF from surgically resected PCLs. RESULTS: Of 25 discriminant MDMs identified in tissue, 13 were selected for validation in 134 CF samples (21 cases [8 HGD, 13 PC], 113 controls [45 ND, 68 LGD]). A tree-based algorithm using 2 CF-MDMs (TBX15, BMP3) achieved sensitivity and specificity above 90%. Discrimination was significantly better by this CF-MDM panel than by mutant KRAS or carcinoembryonic antigen, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.86–0.99), 0.71 (0.57–0.85), and 0.72(0.60–0.84), respectively. Cutoffs for the MDM panel applied to an independent CF validation set (31 cases, 56 controls) yielded similarly high discrimination, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve 5 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.94, P = 0.2). DISCUSSION: Novel MDMs discovered and validated in tissue accurately identify PCLs harboring HGD/PC. A panel of 2 MDMs assayed in CF yielded results with potential to enhance current risk prediction algorithms. Prospective studies are indicated to optimize and further evaluate CF-MDMs for clinical use.

Purpose: Many cancer deaths could be avoided, and survival could be improved with detection of cancer at an earlier stage. Screening programs for breast, colon, and cervical cancer as well as the NLST trial for lung cancer screening demonstrated significant improvement in survival rates with screening. However, for 2021, the American Cancer Society estimates these screened cancers represent less than ~40% of cancer incidence and deaths. The remainder of cancer deaths occur because of tumors in unscreened organs and, therefore, a multicancer test that detects cancer in these organs can increase survival rates. By focusing on detection of unscreened cancers, this type of multicancer test would be complementary to current screening procedures. Here we describe the validation of a combined panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and proteins for multicancer detection through testing an independent set of case/control samples. Experimental Procedures: In this study, we further evaluate the performance of our previously identified panel of 15 MDMs and 5 proteins for multicancer detection (Allawi et al., 2021 AACR Annual Meeting) by testing 315 controls and 160 cases encompassing 6 cancer types (liver, esophageal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and stomach). All samples used in the study were case-control collections with smoking status, age, and gender matching between cases and asymptomatic controls. Testing was performed in blinded fashion using multiplex PCR followed by LQAS (Long probe Quantitative Amplified Signal) assay on bisulfite converted DNA extracted from 3 mL of plasma collected in LB Gard® blood tubes. Protein concentrations were determined from paired serum aliquots and combined with MDMs for a multi-analyte analysis. The subjects were divided into training and validation with equal representation of cancer type, staging, gender, and age. Two thirds of the cases and controls were used to train with a logistic prediction algorithm, and the remaining 1/3 were used to validate the model. Results: Using stepwise logistic regression, a training model of MDMs and protein markers resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.97 and cancer sensitivity of 89% at 98% specificity. The same model predicted the validation set with an AUC of 0.96 and cancer sensitivity of 85% at a specificity of 95%. Applying the algorithm to the combined training and validation sets resulted in sensitivities and specificities of 88% and 97%, respectively. The sensitivities per cancer type ranged from 73% for pancreatic cancer to 97% for lung cancer. Conclusion and Next Steps: This study demonstrates the performance of our MDMs and protein markers and their importance as components in our multi-omics strategy for multicancer detection. The next steps would be to expand the testing to include additional cancer types and combine with NGS-based methods to improve performance and optimize workflow. Citation Format: Hatim T. Allawi, Slava Katerov, Abram Vaccaro, Harrison L. Fleming, Debra E. Rugowski, Brittany Otto, Justin Heilberger, Jillian Cassel, Jacquelyn Hennek, William Taylor, Graham Lidgard. Validation of a panel of methylated DNA and protein markers for multi-cancer detection in plasma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 631.

9567 Background: Cutaneous melanoma surveillance is important to identify low-volume systemic disease, but imaging is costly and poorly accessible to patients; frequent skin checks lack sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to establish clinical feasibility of a liquid biopsy blood test, which quantifies validated, melanoma-specific, methylated DNA markers (MDMs), previously discovered, and reported by our team, using tissue extracted DNA. Methods: We prospectively collected blood from adult patients with histologically confirmed melanoma metastases and no other internal malignancies (within 5-years) who underwent surveillance by FDG-PET/CT (N = 88). Blood from age- and sex balanced cancer-free controls (N = 100) were compared. From PET/CT, we extracted the number of organs involved, SUV-max, and largest tumor diameter. Unequivocal metastasis was defined as SUV ≥ 4 and largest diameter > 5 mm. Because PET/CT is inadequate for the screening of brain metastases, we excluded the brain from the analysis. MDMs ( chr11.149, HOXA9, chr20.210, FLJ22536, CLIC5, SIX4, chr7.155, chr17.730, chr1.110) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays, normalized to B3GALT6, in blinded fashion. Using a logistic regression approach and nine candidate MDMs, we calculated the sensitivity for detecting patients with metastasis on PET/CT at 100% specificity. Results: 52/88 (59%) of melanoma patients showed evidence of metastasis on PET/CT at the time of blood draw. At 100% specificity, a panel of 4 MDMs ( HOXA9, chr20.210, chr17.730, chr1.110) yielded a sensitivity of 86.5% (45/52 cases) vs. 100 cancer-free controls. When applying this model to the 36 PET/CT-negative patients, specificity was as high as 97.2% (35/36 cases) while maintaining a sensitivity of 86.5% (one patient with a positive test result had a complete metabolic response to binimetinib / encorafenib prior to negative PET/CT). For patients with ≥ 2 organs involved by metastasis, sensitivity was 100% (29/29 cases). False-negative cases had metastasis in single organs and were characterized by minimal tumor burden and oral corticosteroid use. One false-negative patient had localized stage III disease without known primary melanoma. Conclusions: Plasma MDM levels appear highly concordant with FDG-PET/CT in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. A liquid biopsy approach has potential to lower cost and improve patient access to surveillance. Additional prospective studies in larger intended use cohorts are needed to validate our results.

5091 Background: Controversy surrounding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) highlights the need for non-invasive assays that better discriminate patients with and without clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Such distinction avoids overtreatment in patients with absent or indolent disease while capturing pathology that would derive benefit from intervention. We analyzed the presence of specific methylated DNA markers (MDMs) within urine samples of patients with biopsy proven PCa and assessed the ability to discriminate these patients from healthy controls with no clinical suspicion for PCa. Methods: 24 healthy volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa were age-matched to 24 patients with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores. Urine collected from subjects was centrifuged with the cell-free supernatant analyzed in a blinded fashion for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes ( HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.193, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.727, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. A patient was considered to have a positive MDM panel if any individual marker exceeded the corresponding100% specificity cut-off value (overall MDM panel specificity of 100%). MDM panel positivity was used to evaluate the sensitivity for distinguishing patients with PCa (any Gleason score) from controls as well as discriminate csPCa cancers from PCa Gleason 6. Results: Median age of healthy controls and PCa patients was 70 years (IQR 67-72) and 65 years (IQR 61-71), respectively. Median PSA was 6.4 (IQR 4.9-9.0) among PCa patients, including median PSA of 5 (IQR 4.0-6.1) for Gleason 6, and 7.8 (IQR 5.1-9.2) for Gleason ≥7 disease. Gleason 6, Gleason 7, and Gleason 8+ cancer was noted in 8, 10, and 6 patients, respectively. Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel revealed an overall sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 63-95%) for detection of PCa (6 of 8 Gleason 6, 9 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+) and 88% (95% CI: 62-98%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). When considering a 100% specificity threshold for controls and Gleason 6 patients, the sensitivity the MDM panel was 69% (95% CI: 41-89%) for csPCa (6 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: We describe a panel of 14 MDMs within urine that offer high specificity and sensitivity for detection of prostate cancers as well as selective identification of clinically significant disease states. Prospective comparison between urine MDMs and PSA blood testing is necessary to discern the differential clinical impact of each screening methodology.

7562 Background: Lymphoma is the 6th most common cancer and a top 10 cause of cancer deaths. To date, there are no blood test approaches to population screening, and accurate surveillance markers are limited. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) are broadly informative for early detection of cancer but have not been extensively studied for lymphomas. We sought to discover and validate MDMs in DNA extracted from lymphoma tissue, then test these MDMs in archival blood plasma specimens. Methods: Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed on DNA extracted from a discovery set of frozen tissues of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL, n=24), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n=78: T-cell-TCL (8); diffuse large B-cell-DLBCL (18); follicular-FL (12); mantle cell-MCL (20); marginal zone-MZL (15)), and lymphoma cell line samples (27); controls included benign lymph node (n=11) and healthy donor buffy coat (n=30). 30 MDMs were ranked by fold-change and AUC and used to design methylation-specific PCR assays for biological validation on independent DNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue from 13 normal lymph node and 63 lymphoma samples and 36 buffy coats from healthy patients. Target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays were developed for 16 MDMs and then assayed in plasma-extracted, bisulfite-converted DNA samples from 390 independent treatment-naïve lymphoma patients (100 CHL and 290 NHL:100 DLBCL, 73 FL, 41 MCL, 41 MZL, 35 TCL), and 210 controls without cancer. Lymphoma plasma samples and 159 controls were provided by the Lymphoma SPORE (CA97274); 51 controls came from a 7-county population archive. Classification of lymphoma cases vs controls was modeled with random forest method and cross-validated across 500 bootstrap samples of each dataset. Results: For MDMs tested in DNA from independent biological validation samples, cross-validated random forest models identified 60/63 cases (95% sensitivity) and 12/13 normal controls (92% specificity). In plasmas, a panel of 16 MDMs ( ZNF503, VWA5B1, HOXA9_5195, GABRG3, ITGA5, MAX_chr17_793, BNC1_2407, CDK20, MAX_chr4_184, TPBG, DNAH14, SYT2, CACNG8, FAM110B, and NRN1) detected 78% (95% CI, 74-82%) of lymphoma cases at 90% specificity. Excluding MZL and TCL, sensitivity increased to 84% (80-88%) including 26/49 (53% (38-67%)) of stage I and 59/71 (83% (71-90%)) of stage II cases. Conclusions: MDMs show promise to detect lymphoma. These markers could be evaluated as part of multicancer early detection testing and could also be evaluated as response markers to treatment and subsequent surveillance.[Table: see text]

e15567 Background: Radiographic surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) after therapy is costly and insensitive. We have reported high cross-sectional performance of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for detection of primary CRC and metastatic recurrence. This study evaluated MDMs to detect recurrence and measure response to anti-cancer therapy in a longitudinal cohort. Methods: This was a nested case-control study drawn from a prospective cohort of adult patients with CRC who completed definitive treatment and followed forward from the start of surveillance by cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), collected every 3-6 months under routine care. Blood was collected in LBgard® tubes (Biomatrica, San Diego CA). Cases had recurrent CRC (defined by RECIST v1.1 or radiographic findings that justify re-initiation of anti-cancer therapy as determined by treating clinicians). Controls remained NED (no radiographic recurrence and off therapy for ≥4 surveillance visits). From 6mL of plasma, MDMs ( CNNM1, ANKRD13B, FER1L4, ZNF568, CHST2, ZNF671, VAV3, QKI, GRIN2D, DTX1, PDGFD, SFMBT2, JAM3) were measured by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays, normalized to B3GALT6, in blinded fashion. Previously published random forest models of MDMs +/- CEA, developed on independent patients with intact primary tumors, were used to develop a summary score. Results: With a median follow-up of 276 days (IQR 187-343) and 3 visits per patient (54 visits total), 18 patients had recurrence after start of surveillance. Another 18 patients remained NED after median 555 days (IRQ 469-662) and 4 surveillance visits per patient (76 visits total). Using a 90th %-ile cut-off summary score from 60 NED patients in a prior cross-sectional measurement, the MDM panel was positive in 15 of 18 patients who recurred and only 2 of the 18 NED patients (Table). Of the 76 patient visits for NED patients, 67 (88%) were below the threshold. The MDM panel score crossed the positivity threshold by a median of 127 days (IRQ 0-233) preceding clinical or radiographic documentation of recurrence. A random forest model with CEA was more sensitive but less specific (Table). In patients who resumed therapy, the MDM panel scores correlated closely with subsequent RECIST scores (not shown). Conclusions: Plasma MDMs rise in anticipation of recurrent CRC prior to radiographic detection and remain low in patients without radiographic disease over serial measurements, warranting further development of this tumor-agnostic liquid biopsy approach as a cost-effective tool to assist cancer surveillance.[Table: see text]

Introduction Nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening may help improve esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. We previously demonstrated promising accuracy of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for the nonendoscopic diagnosis of BE using samples obtained from a capsule sponge-on-string (SOS) device. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these MDMs in an independent cohort using a commercial grade assay. Methods BE cases had ≥ 1 cm of circumferential BE with intestinal metaplasia; controls had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The SOS device was withdrawn 8 minutes after swallowing, followed by endoscopy (the criterion standard). Highest performing MDMs from a previous study were blindly assessed on extracted bisulfite-converted DNA by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Optimal MDM combinations were selected and analyzed using random forest modeling with in silico cross-validation. Results Of 295 patients consented, 268 (91%) swallowed the SOS device; 112 cases and 89 controls met the pre-established inclusion criteria. The median BE length was 6 cm (interquartile range 4-9), and 50% had no dysplasia. The cross-validated sensitivity and specificity of a 5 MDM random forest model were 92% (95% confidence interval 85%-96%) and 94% (95% confidence interval 87%-98%), respectively. Model performance was not affected by age, gender, or smoking history but was influenced by the BE segment length. SOS administration was well tolerated (median [interquartile range] tolerability 2 [0, 4] on 10 scale grading), and 95% preferred SOS over endoscopy. Discussion Using a minimally invasive molecular approach, MDMs assayed from SOS samples show promise as a safe and accurate nonendoscopic test for BE prediction.

Purpose: Gastric adenocarcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Accurate and affordable noninvasive detection methods have potential value for screening and surveillance. Herein, we identify novel methylated DNA markers (MDM) for gastric adenocarcinoma, validate their discrimination for gastric adenocarcinoma in tissues from geographically separate cohorts, explore marker acquisition through the oncogenic cascade, and describe distributions of candidate MDMs in plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls.Experimental Design: Following discovery by unbiased whole-methylome sequencing, candidate MDMs were validated by blinded methylation-specific PCR in archival case–control tissues from U.S. and South Korean patients. Top MDMs were then assayed by an analytically sensitive method (quantitative real-time allele-specific target and signal amplification) in a blinded pilot study on archival plasma from gastric adenocarcinoma cases and normal controls.Results: Whole-methylome discovery yielded novel and highly discriminant candidate MDMs. In tissue, a panel of candidate MDMs detected gastric adenocarcinoma in 92% to 100% of U.S. and South Korean cohorts at 100% specificity. Levels of most MDMs increased progressively from normal mucosa through metaplasia, adenoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma with variation in points of greatest marker acquisition. In plasma, a 3-marker panel (ELMO1, ZNF569, C13orf18) detected 86% (95% CI, 71–95) of gastric adenocarcinomas at 95% specificity.Conclusions: Novel MDMs appear to accurately discriminate gastric adenocarcinoma from normal controls in both tissue and plasma. The point of aberrant methylation during oncogenesis varies by MDM, which may have relevance to marker selection in clinical applications. Further exploration of these MDMs for gastric adenocarcinoma screening and surveillance is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5724–34. ©2018 AACR.

Simple Summary Circulating tumor cells are cancer cells that have entered blood or lymphatic vessels wherefrom they might get access to distant body parts and form metastases. The presence of cancer cells in a blood sample can be exploited for non-invasive diagnostic purposes. However, as blood consists of a vast number of healthy red and white blood cells the task of identifying the few potential cancer cells in a sample is a technical challenge. In this study we explore strategies for detecting circulating tumor cells after a pre-enrichment through binding to VAR2CSA protein coupled to magnetic beads. We evaluate the performance of a novel workflow that recognizes and detects the cancer cells based on their gene expression and compare this with the more traditional detection strategy using antibodies for cell staining. The highly sensitive assay presented here could potentially provide a novel strategy for early cancer detection. Abstract Analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood samples provides a non-invasive approach for early cancer detection. However, the rarity of CTCs makes it challenging to establish assays with the required sensitivity and specificity. We combine a highly sensitive CTC capture assay exploiting the cancer cell binding recombinant malaria VAR2CSA protein (rVAR2) with the detection of colon-related mRNA transcripts (USH1C and CKMT1A). Cancer cell transcripts are detected by RT-qPCR using proprietary Target Enrichment Long-probe Quantitative Amplified Signal (TELQAS) technology. We validate each step of the workflow using colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines spiked into blood and compare this with antibody-based cell detection. USH1C and CKMT1A are expressed in healthy colon tissue and CRC cell lines, while only low-level expression can be detected in healthy white blood cells (WBCs). The qPCR reaction shows a near-perfect amplification efficiency for all primer targets with minimal interference of WBC cDNA. Spike-in of 10 cancer cells in 3 mL blood can be detected and statistically separated from control blood using the RT-qPCR assay after rVAR2 capture (p < 0.01 for both primer targets, Mann-Whitney test). Our results provide a validated workflow for highly sensitive detection of magnetically enriched cancer cells.

Purpose: Screening for high prevalence cancers (breast, colorectum and uterine cervix) reduces mortality; however, most cancer deaths arise in unscreened organs. An ideal solution would accurately detect multiple currently unscreened cancers in a single round of testing. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a targeted assay panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and proteins for detection of highly lethal cancers in a multi-cancer case-control study. Experimental Procedures: Prospectively collected plasmas from 180 cases of 6 cancer types (stage A-D liver (n=36), and TNM stage II-IV esophageal (n=18), lung (n=36), ovarian (n=30), pancreatic (n=30), and stomach (n=30)) and 257 smoking status, age-, and gender-matched asymptomatic controls were tested in blinded fashion. To quantify 26 MDMs previously found to be common among many cancers, multiplex PCR followed by LQAS (Long probe Quantitative Amplified Signal) assay was performed on bisulfite converted DNA extracted from 3 mL of plasma. Additionally, 5 proteins were tested from paired serum aliquots and combined with MDMs for a multi-analyte analysis. Two-thirds of the cases and controls were used to develop prediction algorithms, both logistic regression and random forest models, and the remaining 1/3 were used to validate the models. Results: Using stepwise logistic regression, a combination of 3 proteins (CEA, CA-125, CA19-9) and 5 MDMs (ZNF671, GRIN2D, NDGR4, SHOX2, B3GALT6) resulted in an AUC of 0.95 and an overall sensitivity of 87% for all cancers at 95% specificity. The logistic model on the validation set of the samples resulted in an AUC of 0.96 and a sensitivity of 83% with an observed specificity of 94%. The cancer-specific sensitivities ranged from 78% for lung cancer to 90% for ovarian and pancreatic cancer (Table). Random forest and logistic analyses were in agreement. Conclusion: Targeted assay of select MDMs and proteins show high discrimination for multiple cancers in a case control study, which included early stage patients. Performance with 95% confidence intervals of multi-target assay for multi-cancer detectionSensitivitySpecificityModelOverallBy cancer typeLungEsophagealGastricPancreaticLiverOvarianLogisticTraining set87%(79-92%)79%83%90%95%88%85%95%(90-97%)Test set83%(72-91%)75%100%80%80%75%100%94%(87%-98%)Training + Test186%(80-90%)78%89%87%90%83%90%95%(91-97%)Training + Test275%(68-81%)50%89%83%76%81%80%98%(96-99%)Random forest377%(70-83%)58%78%83%77%81%87%95%(92-97%)195% specificity goal, 5 MDMs and 3 proteins.298% specificity goal, 5 MDMs and 3 proteins.3With 500-fold in silico cross-validation on all samples and all markers (26 MDMs + 5 proteins) Citation Format: Slava Katerov, Abram Vaccaro, Jacquelyn Hennek, Jennifer Carlson, William R. Taylor, Douglas Mahoney, John B. Kisiel, Hatim T. Allawi. Accurate multi-cancer detection using methylated DNA markers and proteins in plasma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 111.

e15511 Background: Aberrantly methylated DNA marker (MDM) candidates are strongly associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) before treatment and detect CRC recurrence with high sensitivity when assayed from plasma. The relationship of these MDMs in association to chemotherapy treatment response is unknown. Methods: In a prospective cohort of patients receiving systemic therapy for advanced CRC, peripheral blood was collected serially during restaging visits. 15 patients were retrospectively identified to have partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) to treatment (n=5 for each group) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Using paired samples from each patient before and after response assessment, we analyzed 11 MDMs ( GRIN2D, ZNF671, ANKRD13B, QKI, VAV3, JAM3, SFMBT2, CHST2, ZNF568, FER1L4 and CNNM1) to assess correlation with treatment response. Cell-free DNA was extracted and bisulfite treated before MDMs were quantified by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assay and normalized to a methylated sequence of B3GALT6. Continuous variables are summarized as a median with corresponding interquartile ranges (IQR) and comparisons between subgroups were based on the Wilcox Rank Sums test. Results: The median interval between pre- and post-response assessment visits was 69 days (IQR: 63-83 days) and the level of tumor burden at pre-assessment was similar across all response types (Table 1). Patients with PD had higher levels of methylated GRIN2D, ZNF671 and ANKRD13B than those with PR or SD at baseline and may offer additional prognostic value over CEA which was similar in the PR and PD groups before treatment (Table 1). Elevation of pre-assessment MDMs preceded radiographic evidence of disease progression by 82 days (IQR 69-83 days). Conclusions: Three MDMs, GRIN2D, ZNF671 and ANKRD13B, were found to reflect treatment response (PD vs. PR + SD) as shown in the table. Although this pilot study was limited by a small sample size, it demonstrated the feasibility of using plasma-based MDMs in monitoring treatment response to systemic therapy for advanced CRC and should be compared to CEA in a larger study.[Table: see text]

4088 Background: Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) are broadly informative for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) but have not been extensively studied for post-treatment surveillance and disease monitoring. We aimed to assess the feasibility of novel CRC-associated MDMs for detection of distant recurrent CRC (rCRC) in plasma. Methods: A panel of 13 MDMs previously identified to be discriminant for primary CRC was selected. In a cross-sectional analysis of plasma samples, MDMs were assayed blindly (by target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal assay) from 160 age/sex-balanced patients (60 healthy controls, 60 with resected CRC and no evidence of disease (NED), and 40 rCRC after primary tumor resection). Plasma-derived carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was measured on all patients. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs (with and without CEA) for the endpoint of rCRC relative to healthy controls. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in the test set. Results: Median patient age was 55 (interquartile range: 49-64) years. As shown in the Table below, a single MDM with the highest AUC was significantly better than CEA ( p= 0.02). On cross validation, CEA provided no additional improvement to the performance of the panel of 13 MDMs ( p= 0.2). The cross-validated panel of MDMs detected rCRC liver metastases with 96% (79-100%) sensitivity, lung metastases with 78% (40-97%) sensitivity, and peritoneal/nodal metastases with 57% (18-90%) sensitivity. Lesions with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors sum > 4 cm were detected with 94% (73-100%) sensitivity and ≤4 cm with 78% (52-94%) sensitivity. Conclusions: Novel MDMs in plasma detect rCRC with promising accuracy. The clinical utility of MDMs for non-invasive post-treatment surveillance and treatment monitoring in CRC warrants further evaluation in longitudinal studies with sufficient follow-up to exclude sub-clinical recurrence in those with NED. [Table: see text]

6072 Background: Effective screening tests for ovarian cancer (OC) are lacking; most cases present at advanced stage and portend poor prognosis. DNA methylation is an early event in carcinogenesis and can be detected in blood plasma samples from cancer patients. In DNA extracted from tissues, we first discovered, then validated discriminant methylated DNA marker (MDM) candidates for OC and subsequently tested independent plasma from women with and without OC. Methods: For discovery, DNA from 67 frozen tissues (18 high grade serous (HGS), 18 endometrioid, 15 clear cell (CC), 6 mucinous OCs; 10 benign fallopian tube epithelium (FT); and 19 buffy coats from cancer-free women underwent reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to identify MDMs associated with OC. Candidate MDM selection was based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) discrimination, methylation fold change, and low background methylation among controls. Blinded biological validation was performed using methylated specific PCR on DNA extracted from independent FFPE tissues from OCs (36 HGS, 22 endometrioid, 21 CC, and 14 mucinous) and 29 FT. Top performing MDMs in tissue were tested using long-probe quantitative amplified signal assays in independent pre-treatment plasma samples from women newly-diagnosed with OC and population-sampled healthy women. A random forest modeling analysis was performed to generate predictive probability of disease; results were 500-fold in silico cross-validated. Results: After RRBS discovery and biological validation, 33 MDMs showed marked methylation fold changes (10 to > 1000) across all OC histologies vs FT. The top 11 MDMs ( GPRIN1, CDO1, SRC, SIM2, AGRN, FAIM2, CELF2, DSCR6, GYPC, CAPN2, BCAT1) were tested on plasma from 91 women with OC (76 (84%) HGS) and 91 without OC; the cross-validated 11-MDM panel highly discriminated OC from controls (96% (95%CI 89-99%) specificity; 79% (69-87%) sensitivity, and AUC 0.91 (0.86 - 0.96)). Among HGS, the panel correctly identified 83%, including 5/6 stage I/II, and the majority of other subtypes (Table). Conclusions: Whole methylome sequencing, stringent filtering criteria, and biological validation yielded outstanding candidate MDMs for OC that performed with promisingly high sensitivity and specificity in plasma. Larger plasma-based OC MDM testing studies, with larger numbers of non-HGS histologies are warranted. [Table: see text]

Background & Aims Precursors of pancreatic cancer arise in the ductal epithelium; markers exfoliated into pancreatic juice might be used to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and cancer. Specific methylated DNA sequences in pancreatic tissue have been associated with adenocarcinoma. We analyzed these methylated DNA markers (MDMs) in pancreatic juice samples from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) with HGD (cases), and assessed their ability to discriminate these patients from individuals without dysplasia or with IPMNs with low-grade dysplasia (controls). Methods We obtained pancreatic juice samples from 38 patients (35 with biopsy-proven PDAC or pancreatic cystic lesions with invasive cancer and 3 with HGD) and 73 controls (32 with normal pancreas and 41 with benign disease), collected endoscopically from the duodenum after secretin administration from February 2015 through November 2016 at 3 medical centers. Samples were analyzed for the presence of 14 MDMs (in the genes NDRG4, BMP3, TBX15, C13orf18, PRKCB, CLEC11A, CD1D, ELMO1, IGF2BP1, RYR2, ADCY1, FER1L4, EMX1, and LRRC4), by quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification. We performed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to determine the ability of each marker, and panels of markers, to distinguish patients with HGD and cancer from controls. MDMs were combined to form a panel for detection using recursive partition trees. Results We identified a group of 3 MDMs (at C13orf18, FER1L4, and BMP3) in pancreatic juice that distinguished cases from controls with an area under the receiver operating characteristic value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.97). Using a specificity cut-off value of 86%, this group of MDMs distinguished patients with any stage of pancreatic cancer from controls with 83% sensitivity (95% CI, 66%–93%) and identified patients with stage I or II PDAC or IPMN with HGD with 80% sensitivity (95% CI, 56%–95%). Conclusions We identified a group of 3 MDMs in pancreatic juice that identify patients with pancreatic cancer with an area under the receiver operating characteristic value of 0.90, including patients with early stage disease or advanced precancer. These DNA methylation patterns might be included in algorithms for early detection of pancreatic cancer, especially in high-risk cohorts. Further optimization and clinical studies are needed.

Early detection improves hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes, but better noninvasive surveillance tools are needed. We aimed to identify and validate methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for HCC detection. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 18 HCC and 35 control tissues. Candidate MDMs were confirmed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR in DNA from independent tissues (74 HCC, 29 controls). A phase I plasma pilot incorporated quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification assays on independent plasma-extracted DNA from 21 HCC cases and 30 controls with cirrhosis. A phase II plasma study was then performed in 95 HCC cases, 51 controls with cirrhosis, and 98 healthy controls using target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal (TELQAS) assays. Recursive partitioning identified best MDM combinations. The entire MDM panel was statistically cross-validated by randomly splitting the data 2:1 for training and testing. Random forest (rForest) regression models performed on the training set predicted disease status in the testing set; median areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCs; and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were reported after 500 iterations. In phase II, a six-marker MDM panel (homeobox A1 [HOXA1], empty spiracles homeobox 1 [EMX1], AK055957, endothelin-converting enzyme 1 [ECE1], phosphofructokinase [PFKP], and C-type lectin domain containing 11A [CLEC11A]) normalized by beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase 6 (B3GALT6) level yielded a best-fit AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) with HCC sensitivity of 95% (88%-98%) at specificity of 92% (86%-96%). The panel detected 3 of 4 (75%) stage 0, 39 of 42 (93%) stage A, 13 of 14 (93%) stage B, 28 of 28 (100%) stage C, and 7 of 7 (100%) stage D HCCs. The AUC value for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 0.80 (0.74-0.87) compared to 0.94 (0.9-0.97) for the cross-validated MDM panel (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: MDMs identified in this study proved to accurately detect HCC by plasma testing. Further optimization and clinical testing of this promising approach are indicated.

Background & Aims Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Analyses of DNA methylation patterns in stool samples have been reported to detect CRC in patients with IBD. We sought to validate these findings in larger cohorts and assess the accuracy of analysis of DNA methylation patterns in stool for detection of CRC and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) normalized to methylation level at ZDHHC1. Methods We obtained buffered, frozen stool samples from a US case–control study and from 2 European surveillance cohorts (referral or population based) of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (n = 248), Crohn's disease (n = 82), indeterminate colitis (n = 2), or IBD with primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 38). Stool samples were collected before bowel preparation for colonoscopy or at least 1 week after colonoscopy. Among the study samples, stools from individuals with IBD but without neoplasia were used as controls (n = 291). DNA was isolated from stool, exposed to bisulfite, and then assayed by multiplex quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification. We analyzed methylation levels of BMP3, NDRG4, VAV3, and SFMBT2 relative to the methylation level of ZDHHC1, and compared these between patients with CRC or HGD and controls. Results Levels of methylation at BMP3 and VAV3, relative to ZDHHC1 methylation, identified patients with CRC and HGD with an area under the curve value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77–1.00). Methylation levels at specific promotor regions of these genes identified 11 of the 12 patients with CRC and HGD, with 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 60%–100%) and 90% specificity (95% CI, 86%–93%). The proportion of false-positive results did not differ significantly among the case–control, referral cohort, and population cohort studies (P = .60) when the 90% specificity cut-off from the whole sample set was applied. Conclusions In an analysis of stool samples from 3 independent studies of 332 patients with IBD, we associated levels of methylation at 2 genes (BMP3 and VAV3), relative to level of methylation at ZDHHC1, with detection of CRC and HGD. These methylation patterns identified patients with CRC and HGD with more than 90% specificity, and might be used in CRC surveillance.

BACKGROUND Aberrantly methylated genes represent important markers for cancer diagnosis. We describe a multiplex detection approach to efficiently quantify these markers for clinical applications such as colorectal cancer screening. METHODS Quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification (QuARTS) combines a polymerase-based target amplification with an invasive cleavage-based signal amplification. The fluorescence signal is detected in a fashion similar to real-time PCR. We measured the dynamic range and analytical sensitivity of multiplex QuARTS reactions with titrated plasmid DNA. We used the QuARTS technology to quantify methylated BMP3, NDRG4, VIM, and TFPI2 genes on 91 DNA samples extracted from colorectal tissues, including 37 cancers, 25 adenomas, and 29 healthy epithelia. The assays were designed in triplex format that incorporated ACTB as a reference gene. Percent methylation was calculated by dividing methylated strands over ACTB strands and multiplying by 100. RESULTS The QuARTS method linearly detected methylated or unmethylated VIM gene down to 10 copies. No cross-reactivity was observed when methylated assays were used to amplify 105 copies of unmethylated gene and vice versa. The multiplex assay detected methylated genes spiked in unmethylated genes at a 0.01% ratio and vice versa. At a diagnostic specificity cutoff of 95%, methylated BMP3, NDRG4, VIM, and TFPI2 detected 84%, 92%, 86%, and 92% of colorectal cancers and 68%, 76%, 76%, and 88% of adenomas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The QuARTS technology provides a promising approach for quantifying methylated markers. The markers assayed highly discriminated colorectal neoplasia from healthy epithelia.

Liquid biopsy continues to gain traction as a minimally invasive method to monitor biomarkers associated with malignancy and metastasis. A simple blood draw can reveal key biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). However, these analytes are present in low quantities and are prone to rapid degradation and contamination, which presents challenges for the detection of rare CTCs and cfDNA targets. Higher molecular weight genomic DNA from poorly stabilized leukocytes can contaminate plasma, compromising liquid biopsy assay results by increasing the total amount of extracted DNA while diluting rare cfDNA targets. Preservation of CTCs and cfDNA over time is thus essential for the accuracy of downstream tests, and preanalytical variables that impact plasma volume, cfDNA yield and quality, and cell recovery in ex vivo blood must be understood. Here, we identified several preanalytical variables, including type of blood collection tube, storage time and conditions post-phlebotomy, and centrifugation conditions for plasma fractionation. We then carried out a series of studies to better understand the interplay between these preanalytical variables and plasma recovery, cell recovery, and cfDNA preservation in healthy donor blood, contrived samples, and patient samples. We found that choice of blood collection tube, in particular, has a significant impact on preservation of plasma volume, CTCs, cfDNA over time, particularly under real-world stress conditions including temperature excursions, sample shipping, and storage time post-draw. The work presented here demonstrates the importance of assessing preanalytical variables for the preservation of cancer biomarkers in whole blood without compromising sample integrity. This will ultimately help researchers make informed decisions on how best to stabilize their analytes of interest without introducing un-intended variables due to blood tube selection, shipping and storage conditions, and plasma isolation conditions. Citation Format: Anita Pottekat, Hatim T. Allawi, Genna T. Boragine, Michael W. Kaiser, Tamara Sander, Chateen Krueger, Janelle J. Bruinsma, Amber N. Murray. A comprehensive assessment of the impact of preanalytical variables on cell free DNA and circulating tumor cells in blood [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4598.