Search

Presents information on a study which investigated the association between a healthy diet indicator and the prevalence of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Relation of cognitive performance with age; Methods; Results and discussion.

Stroke mortality is reported to be greater in blacks than in whites, but stroke incidence data for blacks and Hispanics are sparse. The aim of this study was to determine and compare stroke incidence rates among whites, blacks, and Hispanics living in the same urban community. A population-based incidence study was conducted to identify all cases of first stroke occurring in northern Manhattan, New York City, between July 1, 1993, and June 30, 1996. The population of this area was approximately 210,000 at that time, based on 1990 US Census data. Surveillance for hospitalized and nonhospitalized stroke consisted of daily screening of all admissions, discharges, and computed tomography logs at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, the only hospital in the region, and review of discharge lists from outside hospitals, telephone surveys of random households, and contacts with community physicians, Visiting Nurses' Services, and community agencies. Stroke incidence increased with age and was greater in men than in women. The average annual age-adjusted stroke incidence rate at age > or =20 years, per 100,000 population, was 223 for blacks, 196 for Hispanics, and 93 for whites. Blacks had a 2.4-fold and Hispanics a twofold increase in stroke incidence compared with whites. Cerebral infarct accounted for 77 percent of all strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage for 17 percent, and subarachnoid hemorrhage for 6 percent. These data from the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study suggest that part of the reported excess stroke mortality among blacks in the United States may be a reflection of racial/ethnic differences in stroke incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Driving and epilepsy is a problem that involves physicians as both care providers to patients and consultants to regulatory authorities. Driving restrictions for people with seizure disorders are intended to ensure the public's safety, but such restrictions may unduly harm the welfare of many people with seizures. In the United States, all states now permit some people with epilepsy to drive. In general, only people whose seizures are adequately controlled are licensed to drive. Adequate control has been judged principally by the seizure-free interval, but individual state standards widely vary. There is a trend toward greater liberalization of driving standards for people with seizure disorders, but the appropriateness and application of these standards continue to raise questions, as does the role physicians should have in the licensing process. Our responsibilities to persons with disabilities and advances in our understanding of seizures and the nature of driving risks warrant a reappraisal of the current medical, legal, and social implications of driving and epilepsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the possible effects of genetics on seizure outcome by estimating the familial aggregation of three outcome measures: seizure remission, history of ≥4 tonic-clonic seizures, and seizure control for individuals taking antiseizure medication., Methods: We analyzed families containing multiple persons with epilepsy in four previously collected retrospective cohorts. Seizure remission was defined as being 5 and 10 years seizure-free at last observation. Total number of tonic-clonic seizures was dichotomized at <4 and ≥4 seizures. Seizure control in patients taking antiseizure medication was defined as no seizures for 1, 2, and 3 years. We used Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) to estimate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the family-specific random effect, controlling for epilepsy type, age at epilepsy onset, and age at last data collection as fixed effects. We analyzed each cohort separately and performed meta-analysis using GLMMs., Results: The combined cohorts included 3644 individuals with epilepsy from 1463 families. A history of ≥4 tonic-clonic seizures showed strong familial aggregation in three separate cohorts and meta-analysis (ICC .28, 95% confidence interval [CI] .21-.35, Bayes factor 8 × 10 16 ). Meta-analyses did not reveal significant familial aggregation of seizure remission (ICC .08, 95% CI .01-.17, Bayes factor 1.46) or seizure control for individuals taking antiseizure medication (ICC .13, 95% CI 0-.35, Bayes factor 0.94), with heterogeneity among cohorts., Significance: A history of ≥4 tonic-clonic seizures aggregated strongly in families, suggesting a genetic influence, whereas seizure remission and seizure control for individuals taking antiseizure medications did not aggregate consistently in families. Different seizure outcomes may have different underlying biology and risk factors. These findings should inform the future molecular genetic studies of seizure outcomes., (© 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Background: Stroke is the most common cause of newly diagnosed epilepsy in the elderly, ahead of degenerative disorders, brain tumors, and head trauma. Stroke accounts for 30-50% of unprovoked seizures in patients aged ≥ 60 years. This review discusses the current understanding of epidemiology, risk factors, mechanisms, prevention, and treatment opportunities for post-stroke epilepsy (PSE)., Methods: We performed a literature search in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. The keywords "stroke, epilepsy", "stroke, seizure", "post-stroke seizure", "post-stroke epilepsy" were used to identify the clinical and experimental articles on PSE. All resulting titles and abstracts were evaluated, and any relevant article was considered. The reference lists of all selected papers and reference lists of selected review papers were manually analyzed to find other potentially eligible articles., Results: PSE occurs in about 6% of stroke patients within several years after the event. The main risk factors are cortical lesion, initial stroke severity, young age and seizures in acute stroke period (early seizures, ES). Other risk factors, such as a cardioembolic mechanism or circulation territory involvement, remain debated. The role of ES as a risk factor of PSE could be underestimated especially in young age. Mechanism of epileptogenesis may involve gliosis scarring, alteration in synaptic plasticity, etc.; and ES may enhance these processes. Statins especially in the acute period of stroke are possible agents for PSE prevention presumably due to their anticonvulsant and neuroprotection effects. Antiepileptic drugs (AED) monotherapy is enough for seizure prevention in most cases of PSE; but no evidence was found for its efficiency against epileptic foci formation. The growing interest in PSE has led to a notable increase in the number of published articles each year. To aid in navigating this expanding body of literature, several tables are included in the manuscript., Conclusion: Further studies are needed for better understanding of the pathophysiology of PSE and searching the prevention strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is a significant concern in the elderly population, with stroke being a leading cause of epilepsy in this demographic. Several factors have shown consistent associations with the risk of developing PSE, including cortical lesions, initial stroke severity, younger age, and the occurrence of early seizures. The primary objectives of this study were two-fold: (1) to determine the incidence of PSE and (2) to identify the risk factors associated with PSE in a prospective cohort of post-stroke patients., Methods: A prospective single-hospital study was conducted, involving patients diagnosed with acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The patients were followed up for 2 years (or until death) from the time of admission. Data about seizure occurrence and recurrent stroke were collected. Kaplan-Meyer curves were used for the assessment of PSE incidence and mortality. Possible predictors of PSE and mortality were selected from between-group analysis and tested in multivariable regressions., Results: Our study enrolled a total of 424 patients diagnosed with acute stroke. Among them, 97 cases (23%) experienced early post-stroke seizures, and 28 patients (6.6%) developed PSE. The cumulative risks of developing PSE were found to be 15.4% after hemorrhagic stroke and 8.7% after ischemic stroke. In multivariable fine and gray regression with competitive risk of death, significant predictors for developing PSE in the ischemic cohort were watershed infarction (HR 6.01, 95% CI 2.29-15.77, p < 0.001) and low Barthel index at discharge (HR 0.98, CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.04). Furthermore, patients who eventually developed PSE showed slower recovery and presented a worse neurologic status at the time of discharge. The in-hospital dynamics of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were significantly worse in the PSE group compared to the non-PSE group ( p = 0.01)., Discussion: A higher proportion of cases experienced early seizures compared to what has been commonly reported in similar studies. Watershed stroke and low Barthel index at discharge were both identified as independent risk factors of PSE in ischemic strokes, which sheds light on the underlying mechanisms that may predispose individuals to post-stroke epilepsy after experiencing an ischemic stroke., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Freiman, Hauser, Rider, Yaroslavskaya, Sazina, Vladimirova, Kaimovsky, Shpak, Gulyaeva and Guekht.)

Objective: We hypothesized that PWE have an increased risk to acquire COVID-19. This was a historical cohort study to determine COVID-19 incidence, severity, mortality and risk factors in adults with active epilepsy (PWE) compared to residents of Moscow without epilepsy matched by age, gender, and region of residence - Moscow Community Comparisons (MCC)., Methods: Subjects were derived from a cohort of adult PWE and a cohort of age- and gender-matched population-based MCC without epilepsy identified in 2018. Incidence of COVID-19 was compared in each cohort from 01.03.2020 through 28.02.21. Influence of age, gender, comorbidities, and for the PWE cohort, epilepsy type, seizure frequency, and number/class of antiseizure medications was evaluated using Pearson's chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis., Results: We found 887 COVID-19 positive people in the two cohorts: 156 in PWE (51.8 ± 19.7 years) and 731 in MCC (52.0 ± 17.3 years,). COVID-19 incidence was lower in PWE: 13.8 % versus 18.7 % in MCC (p = 0.0002). In PWE no specific epilepsy related variables influenced incidence. Despite no difference in severity distribution in PWE versus MCC, hospitalization rate (37.6 % versus 25.5 %, p = 0.002), disease duration (57.1 % versus 47.1, p = 0.023), and mortality (10.9% versus 4.2 %, p = 0.0009) were significantly higher in PWE. Age and number of comorbidities significantly influenced COVID-19 incidence, severity, duration, and outcomes in both cohorts., Significance: Incidence of COVID-19 in PWE in Moscow was significantly lower compared to MCC. Age and comorbidities were strongly associated with severity, duration and outcomes of COVID-19 for all infected persons. Higher mortality in PWE may be explained by a higher number of comorbidities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pregnancy registries, designed to assess the safety of medications and vaccines for the exposed mother and fetus, have been developed since the 1990s. Malformations present in the exposed liveborn or stillborn infant or fetuses in elective terminations are the outcome of greatest concern. The experiences of the North American AED (antiepileptic drug) Pregnancy Registry (NAAPR) can be used to identify the challenges and limitations of a pregnancy registry in identifying congenital malformations., Methods: The NAAPR enrolls pregnant women who are taking one or more AEDs for any medical condition, but primarily to prevent seizures, and an unexposed comparison group. Participants are interviewed by clinical research coordinators (CRCs) at enrollment, later in pregnancy and postpartum. Malformations are identified in the mother's reports and her infant's medical records through age 12 weeks. A teratologist, blinded to exposure status, evaluates each potential malformation identified., Results: Among 10,982 pregnancies enrolled between 1997 and 2022, 282 malformations were identified in the 9677 AED-exposed and 15 among the 1305 unexposed infants. Isolated malformations, such as cleft palate, accounted for 84% of the malformations identified. Increased frequencies of oral clefts and myelomeningocele were associated with exposure to several different AEDs. Copies of reports from many diagnostic studies were not obtained and very few pregnancy losses had autopsies., Conclusions: The evaluation of the AED-exposed infants in a pregnancy registry is indirect. Improvements rely on the rapport established with the mothers by the CRCs and the mothers' willingness to assist in obtaining information from her infants' physicians., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Mental health conditions (MHCs) are frequent comorbidities among people with epilepsy; however, the influence of seizure control on the incidence of MHCs is not well reported. This retrospective observational cohort study based on claims data evaluated the effects of indicators of poor seizure control on the incidence of MHCs among MHC-naïve people with epilepsy. We hypothesized that poor seizure control is associated with new-onset MHC diagnoses and/or new prescription drugs for MHCs., Methods: This study utilized a sample of patients from HealthVerity Marketplace, which includes more than 150 US commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid payers, to identify a cohort of adults (age ≥18 years) with prevalent epilepsy. Follow-up started on day 1 (January 1) after a 1-year eligibility assessment period occurring in calendar year 2017 or 2018. Patients were followed up until the occurrence of an incident MHC event (primary outcome), defined as a mental health diagnosis or psychotropic drug prescription. Time from follow-up to incident MHC diagnosis or to a drug prescription specific to depression or anxiety disorder was analyzed as a secondary outcome. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were estimated with time-varying covariates, measured in 6-month intervals during follow-up. Time-varying covariates were based on the occurrence of 4 variables used as indicators of poor seizure control in the prior period: epilepsy-related emergent care admissions, epilepsy-related inpatient admissions, epilepsy electroencephalography referrals, and exposure to one or more new antiseizure medications (ASMs)., Results: From a random sample of 40,000 people with epilepsy, 2563 (mean age 46.1 years; 50.6% male) were included in the analysis. Incident MHC events were observed in 27.7% (incidence rate 24.4 events per 100 person-years over 2,915.7 total person-years of follow-up). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to event was 232.7 (186.3) days. Among the 4 variables, epilepsy-related emergent care admissions were associated with an increased risk of incident MHC events in the following 6-month period (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.676, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.386, 2.026, p < 0.001) as were prescriptions for new ASMs in the previous period (HR = 1.702, 95% CI: 1.359, 2.132, p < 0.001). Previous epilepsy-related emergent care admissions (HR = 1.650, 95% CI: 1.347, 2.021, p < 0.001) and new ASMs (HR = 1.632, 95% CI: 1.280, 2.081, p < 0.001) also predicted an increased risk of incident depression or anxiety in the following 6-month period., Conclusions: Previous indicators of poor seizure control, including epilepsy-related emergent care admissions and new ASMs, predicted increased risk of new MHC events, including depression and anxiety, during the following 6-month interval in MHC-naïve patients with prevalent epilepsy. These data suggest that poor seizure control can increase the subsequent risk of new mental health diagnoses and treatment among people with epilepsy., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Epilepsy and neurocysticercosis are common neurological disorders and are major public health issues that contribute to the world's burden of disease. Acute symptomatic seizures, the main clinical manifestation of parenchymal neurocysticercosis, are caused by the host brain immune-inflammatory process in response to the death or degenerative phase of the parasite. Seizures may recur over the course of several months while the local inflammatory activity lasts. If the seizures recur once the acute process resolves, the patient can be diagnosed as having epilepsy. However, most acute symptomatic seizures secondary to neurocysticercosis do not evolve to epilepsy. Recent prospective studies suggest that the development of epilepsy, while more common than in the general population, is not as common in neurocysticercosis patients as originally suggested by cross-sectional studies. Antiparasitic treatment has been found to hasten the transition of cysts from the active phase to the degenerative phase and is associated with a short-term reduction in focal seizures after treatment. However, antiparasitic treatment has not been found to affect the transition from the degenerative phase to calcification, which is an epileptogenic substrate associated with subsequent epilepsy. In this narrative review, we critically appraise the relationship among neurocysticercosis, seizures, and epilepsy in the context of new developments in the literature., (Copyright © 2021 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Interictal dysphoric disorder (IDD) has been regarded as an affective disorder occurring only in people with epilepsy (PWE). Data showing similar characteristics and similar prevalence of IDD in patients with migraine and with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures question the epilepsy-specific nature of IDD. The aim of the study was to investigate the nature of IDD in people with prevalent epilepsy with mood disorders and people with mood disorders who are free of neurological disease., Methods: This is a case-control study, with 142 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy and major depressive disorder (MDD; cases) and 222 patients with MDD only (controls). MDD diagnosis was confirmed by a structured clinical interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (SCID-I-RV). We used the Beck Depression Inventory and the Beck Anxiety Inventory to estimate anxiety and depression levels and the Interictal Dysphoric Disorder Inventory (IDDI) to confirm the presence of IDD. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson chi-squared, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression were used., Results: No differences were found in the prevalence of IDD between PWE with MDD and people with MDD alone (88.73% vs. 85.13%, χ2 = .96, p = .32). There were no differences between the groups overall or for any IDDI subscales (all p > .05). In both groups, IDD symptoms were grouped with the same incidence and had the same duration and periodicity. IDD was not associated with epilepsy (odds ratio = .84, 95% confidence interval = .40-1.98, p = .72). No significant correlation was found between epilepsy, demographic characteristics, and all IDDI subscales (all p > .05). Notably, patients with IDD suffered from affective disorders longer (6.68 ± 6.82 years vs. 3.7 ± 3.97 years, p = .001) and also received higher scores on all psychometric scales (all p < .05)., Significance: This study does not confirm the specificity of IDD for epilepsy. The presence of IDD symptoms may be associated with a more severe course of MDD and significant anxiety distress., (© 2021 International League Against Epilepsy.)