Search

Long, J.H.; Hanebuth, T.J.J.; Durica, J.T., and Hawkes, A.D., 2024. Late Holocene stratigraphy and sedimentary facies distribution of an anthropogenically modified delta plain (Santee River Delta, South Carolina, U.S.A.). Journal of Coastal Research, 40(4), 623–646. Charlotte (North Carolina), ISSN 0749-0208. The Santee River of South Carolina has the second largest watershed in the eastern United States and forms the largest river-fed delta along the U.S. east coast. Anthropogenic modifications to the delta plain of the Santee River, and in many coastal environments within the region, have significantly altered the natural configurations of floodplains, channels, and shorelines. This study incorporated historic and modern state-of-the-art data sets and methods to evaluate the sediment distribution within the modern delta plain as well as the record of environmental change throughout the late Holocene as it is preserved within the subsurface stratigraphy. The study incorporated high-resolution seismo-acoustic and bathymetric data, detailed sediment core analysis, accelerator mass spectrometry 14C dating, micropaleontological analysis, and surface sediment samples to define geomorphic zones based on dominant depositional processes related to fluvial discharge, tides, and waves. Tidal- and wave-influenced conditions were established in the delta plain by around 3 kyr BP and continued into historic times, when the construction of rice fields across most of the delta plain fixed channel positions and isolated floodplains from flood-related sedimentation. Sediment distribution in the modern delta plain is significantly influenced by the maintained network of artificial canals and embankments associated with these historic fields. The influence of these modifications can also be seen within the stratigraphy beneath the delta plain, recording local changes in deposition and erosion that resulted from a modification in water circulation and sediment supply. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Megathrust earthquakes in western North America may be preceded by a precursor phase several years prior to megathrust, induced earthquakes. For example, on 27 March 1964, a 9.2 magnitude (on the Richter scale) earthquake occurred on the coast of Alaska. Changes in foraminifera and diatom assemblages at Girdwood Flats, Alaska, provide evidence of a precursor to this earthquake, thereby detailing a previously unknown sequence of events. We describe further evidence of precursor phases from marshes in Turnagain Arm, Alaska, United States, and farther south in Netarts Bay, Oregon, United States; this is the first time that two widely spaced locations have been examined for earthquake-related precursor stages. The Alaska earthquake offers the possibility to compare a modern sequence (A.D. 1964) of events with the geologic record. The Netarts Bay marsh has experienced no modern earthquake that could be used for comparison, but the nature of megathrust zones implies that the modern and ancient events should be physically similar. New cores examined from Turnagain Arm include both the 1964 earthquake and an event identified and dated at 1800 yr B.P. Prior to the 1964 event, the foraminifera and thecamoebian assemblages changed from a forest phase to a mildly brackish stage; this sequence was dated as being 15 yr or less in length, using [Pb.sup.210] and [Cs.sup.137] dating techniques. The event at 1800 yr B.P. was also associated with a similar precursor stage, indicating a small subsidence prior to the megathrust earthquake-related subsidence event. In Netarts Bay a new core was taken at a previously cored site to make use of carbon-14 dates and the assurance that at least four events were known to have occurred over the past 3000 yr. The new core contains four transitions, each identified by a mineralic deposit, often sharply bounded below and gradationally overlain by marsh peat. Transition in this context refers to the section of core analyzed, ~15 cm above and below each of the four sand layers. Foraminiferal assemblage analyses indicate that these units represented a high marsh prequake phase followed by a lower marsh precursor stage, the earthquake-related deposition (sand layer), and then a rebound back into postquake marsh deposits. Sand deposits with either no or few foraminifera are inferred as tsunami/ earthquake-related deposition stages. These transitions in two widely separated geographic areas (Alaska and Oregon) indicate that similar mechanisms operate for large megathrust earthquakes at subduction zones from Alaska to northern California in the Cascadia Subduction Zone, thus implying that precursor events also occur and can be detected by foraminiferai zonation all along this area. In a recent article (Dragert et al., 2001), scientists from the west coast suggested that 'slow' or 'silent' earthquakes they measured with continuous geographical positioning systems might be indicators of megathrust earthquakes. The transitions we document may be the prehistoric representations of these 'silent' quakes. Foraminiferal evidence may help by allowing, more accurate positioning of seismometers along the west coast of North America and thereby lead to more precise and timely earthquake prediction methods. Keywords: precursor, megathrust earthquake, foraminifera, thecamoebian, marsh/ forest transition.

Lithology and microfossil biostratigraphy beneath the marshes of a central Oregon estuary limit geophysical models of Cascadia megathrust rupture during successive earthquakes by ruling out >0.5 m of coseismic coastal subsidence for the past 2000 yr. Although the stratigraphy in cores and outcrops includes as many as 12 peat-mud contacts, like those commonly inferred to record subsidence during megathrust earthquakes, mapping, qualitative diatom analysis, foraminiferal transfer function analysis, and 14C dating of the contacts failed to confirm that any contacts formed through subsidence during great earthquakes. Based on the youngest peat-mud contact's distinctness, >400 m distribution, ~0.6 m depth, and overlying probable tsunami deposit, we attribute it to the great 1700 CE Cascadia earthquake and(or) its accompanying tsunami. Minimal changes in diatom assemblages from below the contact to above its probable tsunami deposit suggest that the lower of several foraminiferal transfer function reconstructions of coseismic subsidence across the contact (0.1-0.5 m) is most accurate. The more limited stratigraphic extent and minimal changes in lithology, foraminifera, and(or) diatom assemblages across the other 11 peat-mud contacts are insufficient to distinguish them from contacts formed through small, gradual, or localized changes in tide levels during river floods, storm surges, and gradual sea-level rise. Although no data preclude any contacts from being synchronous with a megathrust earthquake, the evidence is equally consistent with all contacts recording relative sea-level changes below the ~0.5 m detection threshold for distinguishing coseismic from nonseismic changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research has documented the usefulness of Lidar data to derive a variety of topographic products (e.g., DEM, DTM, canopy and forest structure, and urban infrastructure). Lidar has been used to map coastal environments and geomorphology; however, there is no comprehensive model to derive coastal geomorphology. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to build on existing research and develop an automated modeling approach to classify coastal geomorphology across barrier islands. The model was developed and tested at four sites in North Carolina including two undeveloped and two developed islands. Barrier island geomorphology is shaped by natural coastal processes, such as storms and longshore sediment transport, as well as human influences, such as beach nourishment and urban development. The model was developed to classify ten geomorphic features over four time-steps from 1998 to 2014. Model results were compared to compute change through time and derived the rate and direction of feature movement. Tropical storms and hurricanes had the most influence in geomorphic change and movement. On the developed islands, there was less influence of storms due to the inability of features to move because of coastal infrastructure. From 2005 to 2010, beach nourishment was the dominant influence on developed beaches because this activity ameliorated the natural tendency for an island to erode. Understanding how natural and anthropogenic processes influence barrier island geomorphology is critical to predicting an island's future response to changing environmental factors such as sea-level rise. The development of an automated model enables it to be replicated in other locations where policy makers and coastal managers may use this information to make development and conservation decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We assessed the utility of δ13C and bulk geochemistry (total organic content and C:N) to reconstruct relative sea-level changes on the Cascadia subduction zone through comparison with an established sea-level indicator (benthic foraminifera). Four modern transects collected from three tidal environments at Siletz Bay, Oregon, USA, produced three elevation-dependent groups in both the foraminiferal and δ13C/bulk geochemistry datasets. Foraminiferal samples from the tidal flat and low marsh are identified by Miliammina fusca abundances of >45%, middle and high marsh by M. fusca abundances of <45% and the highest marsh by Trochamminita irregularis abundances >25%. The δ13C values from the groups defined with δ13C/bulk geochemistry analyses decrease with an increasing elevation; −24.1±1.7‰ in the tidal flat and low marsh; −27.3±1.4‰ in the middle and high marsh; and −29.6±0.8‰ in the highest marsh samples. We applied the modern foraminiferal and δ13C distributions to a core that contained a stratigraphic contact marking the great Cascadia earthquake of AD 1700. Both techniques gave similar values for coseismic subsidence across the contact (0.88±0.39m and 0.71±0.56m) suggesting that δ13C has potential for identifying amounts of relative sea-level change due to tectonics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]