Search

In order to successfully integrate screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) into primary care, education of clinicians must be paired with sustainable transformation of the clinical settings in which they practice. The SBIRT Oregon project adopted this strategy in an effort to fully integrate SBIRT into 7 primary care residency clinics. Residents were trained to assess and intervene in their patients' unhealthy substance use, whereas clinic staff personnel were trained to carry out a multistep screening process. Electronic medical record tools were created to further integrate and track SBIRT processes. This article describes how a resident training curriculum complemented and was informed by the transformation of workflow processes within the residents' home clinics. (Contains 2 tables.)

Abstract Background As more integrative medicine educational content is integrated into conventional family medicine teaching, the need for effective evaluation strategies grows. Through the Integrative Family Medicine program, a six site pilot program of a four year residency training model combining integrative medicine and family medicine training, we have developed and tested a set of competency-based evaluation tools to assess residents' skills in integrative medicine history-taking and treatment planning. This paper presents the results from the implementation of direct observation and treatment plan evaluation tools, as well as the results of two Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) developed for the program. Methods The direct observation (DO) and treatment plan (TP) evaluation tools developed for the IFM program were implemented by faculty at each of the six sites during the PGY-4 year (n = 11 on DO and n = 8 on TP). The OSCE I was implemented first in 2005 (n = 6), revised and then implemented with a second class of IFM participants in 2006 (n = 7). OSCE II was implemented in fall 2005 with only one class of IFM participants (n = 6). Data from the initial implementation of these tools are described using descriptive statistics. Results Results from the implementation of these tools at the IFM sites suggest that we need more emphasis in our curriculum on incorporating spirituality into history-taking and treatment planning, and more training for IFM residents on effective assessment of readiness for change and strategies for delivering integrative medicine treatment recommendations. Focusing our OSCE assessment more narrowly on integrative medicine history-taking skills was much more effective in delineating strengths and weaknesses in our residents' performance than using the OSCE for both integrative and more basic communication competencies. Conclusion As these tools are refined further they will be of value both in improving our teaching in the IFM program and as competency-based evaluation resources for the expanding number of family medicine residency programs incorporating integrative medicine into their curriculum. The next stages of work on these instruments will involve establishing inter-rater reliability and defining more clearly the specific behaviors which we believe establish competency in the integrative medicine skills defined for the program.

Background & aim: Six Oregon primary care clinics integrated a team-based, systematized alcohol and drug Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) process into their standard clinic workflow. Clinic staff administered screening forms and brief assessments, and clinicians were trained to perform brief interventions and treatment referrals when needed. Methods: Patient-level data from the electronic health record (EHR) were used to calculate implementation rates in each clinic - specifically, how often each step of a 3-step SBIRT process was performed when indicated. Rates were tracked on a quarterly basis over 2 years. Results: Implementation rates increased over time for screening and assessment tasks performed by clinic staff, but not for brief interventions performed by clinicians. Averaged over time, annual screens were given to approximately 44% of eligible patients, brief assessments to around 66% of eligible patients, and brief interventions to about 40% of those eligible. Considerable variability existed across individual clinics, some of which demonstrated notably high rates. Conclusion: A team-based approach to SBIRT in primary care settings capitalizes on the medical home model but also creates unique challenges. Facilitative EHR tools are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: As growing numbers of patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), improvement is needed in communication between providers of CAM and allopathic medicine. This study describes collaborative acupuncture clinics (CACs) run by providers from Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and the Oregon College of Oriental Medicine (OCOM) in the setting of family medicine teaching clinics. It examines patient demographics, quality of education for medical learners, referral practices of primary care physicians (PCPs), and quality of communication between acupuncturists and PCPs at these clinics. Design: Demographic data were abstracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at least three times in the CACs between 2006 and 2007. A survey on quality of education at the CACs was given to acupuncture interns, medical students, and acupuncture supervisors. A separate survey collected information from PCPs at the family medicine clinics regarding referral practices to acupuncture and quality of communication between PCPs and acupuncturists. Results: Of the 96 patients seen at the clinics, 74% were female, 76% were European-American, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Sixty-one percent (61%) of patients were insured through private insurance, 31.3% had Medicare or Medicaid, and 7.3% did not have insurance. Most of the 51 acupuncture providers who responded were satisfied with the quality of education at the CACs. Eighty percent of responding PCPs had referred at least one patient to the CACs. The majority of referrals was for a pain condition. Most PCPs would find a summary of the acupuncture visit helpful. Referral practices to different modalities were most influenced by patient interest and physician's belief in whether or not the modality would help. Conclusions: Demographics of patients at the CACs were comparable to those of patients seen in other acupuncture clinics. The collaborative structure of the CACs allowed for a unique learning experience and improved communication between providers of CAM and conventional medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Prescribing medications for chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) can be challenging for physicians for many reasons. In 1999, the state of Oregon implemented new guidelines governing the prescription of medications for CNMP. This study assessed the quality of care provided to CNMP patients, including the extent of compliance with the new state requirements 2 years after they were implemented., Methods: We used telephone records to identify patients who had called for prescription refills between mid 2001 and mid 2002. We then reviewed medical records of those patients to identify those who received refills for opioids or benzodiazepines for treatment of chronic pain. Medical records were evaluated to measure the percentage of records exhibiting documentation of compliance with state prescribing laws and other features indicative of a high standard of care., Results: Ninety seven percent of records included documentation of the diagnosis for which chronic therapy was indicated. Required Material Risk Notification Forms were absent from 100% of charts. Seventy-five percent of records document consultation with a pain specialist or other physician with specialty pertinent to the patient's source of pain. Medication contracts were only present in 39% of records, and documentation of a pain evaluation and functional evaluation was present in 67% and 54% of records, respectively., Conclusions: Review of medical records in our clinic documented less-than-optimal compliance with state laws regulating prescribing for CNMP and the need for improvement in assessment and care of these patients.