Search

Introduction There have been exponential growth and increased interest in postgraduate residency/fellowship formalized training among nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants/associates (PAs). Although not a requirement for state licensure and entry-level practice, postgraduate NP and PA residency/fellowship programs offer a structured pathway for new graduates and experienced PAs and NPs looking to transition into a new medical or surgical specialty/subspecialty. In this article, we examine the perceptions of employed NPs and PAs toward postgraduate training including the concept of developing a program at our institution.  Methodology This was a cross-sectional single-large academic medical center (AMC) study, where an anonymous electronic survey was initially developed by the director of advanced practice providers (APPs). The survey was piloted by members of the Advanced Practice Council (APC) comprising NPs, PAs, and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), and their collective feedback was used to finalize the survey prior to distribution. Descriptive statistics were used to describe and summarize the data. In addition, we assessed the association between respondents characteristics and perceptions regarding NP and PA residency/fellowship programs using chi-squared tests of independence. Results The majority of the respondents (69.1%; 65/94) believed that starting an advanced practice residency/fellowship program at our AMC has many benefits such as increasing specialty-specific knowledge and training (79.8%; 75/94), improving medical decision-making (73.4%; 69/94), promoting professional development and clinical education (73.4%; 69/94), and improving procedural competency (60.6%; 57/94). Moreover, over half of the respondents (53.2%; 50/94) indicated that there is value in an APP residency/fellowship program obtaining optional accreditation. Additionally, over half of the respondents (56.4%; 53/94) indicated that they would be interested in participating as a clinical preceptor if an APP residency/fellowship program was developed at our AMC. Lastly, about one-third of the respondents felt strongly that APP residency/fellowship training programs should offer post-professional doctoral degree options such as Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), Doctor of Medical Science (DMSc), and Doctor of Health Science (DHSc). Conclusion Although most respondents have never completed a formalized postgraduate training program and were less familiar with the published literature regarding these programs, our findings suggest that the attitudes of employed NPs and PAs are generally positive toward the concept of postgraduate specialty-specific training.

The prevalence rates and correlates of mental or physical disability among recently resettled refugees, who undergo strenuous journeys before arriving in the US, remain unknown, masking potential health disparities. Self-reported disability was measured by the 2018 Annual Survey of Refugees (ASR), and defined as having a physical, mental, or other health condition for more than 6 months that precluded one from working. Prevalence rates of self-reported disability and sample correlates were investigated using descriptive and logistic regression analyses. Of N = 4259 participating refugees in ASR (Mean Age = 28.2, SD = 17.2; 52.5% male), 2875 responded to the disability question and 21.4% reported disability. About 33.7% were born in the Middle East region, 29.5% had no formal education, and 35% had an income of less than $15,000. Age (OR = 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.06,1.07], p

INTRODUCTION: The opioid overdose crisis in the United States has become a significant national emergency. Buprenorphine, a primary medication for individuals coping with opioid use disorder (OUD), presents promising pharmacokinetic properties for use in primary care settings, and is often delivered as a take-home therapy. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the scarcity of access to buprenorphine, leading to dire consequences for those with OUD. Most existing studies, primarily focused on the immediate aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak, highlight the challenges in accessing medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs), particularly buprenorphine. However, these studies only cover a relatively short timeframe. METHODS: To bridge this research gap, in our study, we utilized 33 months of Californias prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) data to provide insights into real-world buprenorphine dispensing trends since the onset of the pandemic from 2018 to 2021, focusing on outcomes such as patient counts, prescription volumes, prescriber involvement, days supply, and dosage. Statistical analysis employed interrupted time series analysis to measure changes in trends before and during the pandemic. RESULTS: We found no significant impact on patient counts or prescription volumes during the pandemic, although it impeded the upward trajectory of prescriber numbers that was evident prior to the onset of the pandemic. An immediate increase in days supply per prescription was observed post-pandemic. CONCLUSION: Our findings differ in comparison to previous data regarding the raw monthly count of patients and prescriptions. The analysis encompassed uninsured patients, offering a comprehensive perspective on buprenorphine prescribing in California. Our studys insights contribute to understanding the impact of COVID-19 on buprenorphine access, emphasizing the need for policy adjustments.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have documented the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on low-income families, rural and underserved areas, and racial and ethnic minority populations. However, less is known about immigrants healthcare access and utilization, including telehealth use. This study investigated disparities in healthcare access and utilization by immigration status among adults aged 18-64 years during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This cross-sectional study pooled data from the 2020 and 2021 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the variation of healthcare access and utilization by citizenship and nativity status. Immigration status (U.S.-born citizen, naturalized U.S. citizen, and non-citizen) served as the key independent variable. Healthcare access measures were dichotomized indicators of whether individuals had delayed medical care either due to cost or due to COVID-19. Healthcare utilization measures included whether individuals visited a doctor, used the emergency room, or had a telehealth visit during COVID-19. RESULTS: Compared to U.S.-born citizens, non-citizen immigrants were more likely to delay medical care due to cost (adjusted OR = 1.375, [95%CI: 1.137, 1.662]), less likely to visit a doctor (adjusted OR = 0.71, [95%CI: 0.617, 0.817]), or visit an emergency room (adjusted OR = 0.756, [95%CI: 0.635, 0.901]). Non-citizen immigrants were less likely to have a telehealth visit (either video or phone visits) during COVID-19 (adjusted OR = 0.634, [95%CI: 0.557, 0.723]). DISCUSSION: Compared to U.S.-born citizens, lower healthcare and telehealth utilization persisted among non-citizen immigrants during the pandemic.

Individuals who identify as a sexual minority, including those who are lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB), face barriers to healthcare as well as increased discrimination, stigmatization, and negative experiences during healthcare use. Further, few healthcare providers have education and training focused on the specific healthcare needs of individuals who are part of a sexual minority group. Given the limited research on Canadian healthcare access for sexual minorities, our purpose was to use data (n > 2,800) from the 2015–16 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) to investigate the perceptions of healthcare access for LGB and non-LGB Canadians. Although non-LGB and LGB participants reported comparable access to a regular care provider and were equally likely to have consulted with a general practitioner in the past 12 months, LGB respondents were more likely to have seen a specialist and reported more unmet health needs. Although we expected the linear effects of both race and sex to vary by LGB status, this effect only occurred in one model. Current results have implications for addressing health inequalities for sexual minorities, including poorer health outcomes and greater discrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emergency departments (EDs) are often patients' first point of contact with the health care system. Race, ethnicity, and language all influence factors leading up to ED visits and patient experiences within the ED. There is limited evidence showing how race, ethnicity, and language interact to shape ED experiences, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when EDs were extremely strained. Using a retrospective review, we evaluated the association of race, ethnicity and preferred language on hospital admissions from the ED for patients with COVID-19 in an urban, safety-net hospital during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were widely available. We performed a nested regression analysis using generalized estimating equation (GEE) logit models to estimate the impact of language, race, and ethnicity on hospital admissions while controlling for other health conditions and healthcare utilization. Patients who spoke Spanish and were Latino had 72% higher odds [95% confidence interval (CI):1.34–2.2] of hospital admission compared to patients who were White and spoke English. Patients who were Asian, the majority of whom also spoke languages other than English, had 130% higher odds (95% CI: 1.39–3.92) of hospital admission compared to patients who were White and English Speaking. Findings suggest multiple mechanisms influence hospital admissions for patients who are racially and ethnically minoritized and speak Spanish. Providers may have admitted patients as a precaution rather than because of more advanced illness. Evaluating race, ethnicity, and language concurrently can reveal how intersectional factors shape patient experiences in the ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the burden of chronic Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes and hypertension, and evaluate the utilization of drugs for their treatment among the population of Andhra Pradesh, India. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyse the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, as well as the pattern of drug usage for their management. Data were collected through surveys and medical records review. Results: The study revealed a high prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in Andhra Pradesh, with significant proportions of the population remaining untreated despite critical drug utilization. Commonly used antidiabetic drugs included metformin, glipizide, and insulin, while telmisartan, furosemide, and metoprolol were frequently utilized for hypertension treatment. Side effects associated with these drugs were reported, emphasizing the need for better public awareness campaigns, improved access to healthcare, and effective management of side effects. Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of early detection and preventive measures for hypertension and diabetes. There is a pressing need for tailored interventions addressing social and economic factors contributing to non-adherence to treatment regimens. While the widespread use of medications indicates significant awareness and proactive healthcare among a substantial portion of the population, the presence of individuals not adhering to their treatment suggests significant gaps in awareness and access to healthcare services. This study provides crucial insights into medication patterns for managing diabetes and hypertension in Andhra Pradesh, laying the groundwork for targeted public health interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Migrants face various challenges in new environments, which are further compounded for those with sensory disabilities. Deaf migrants often encounter unique obstacles that affect their integration and quality of life. This study aims to explore disparities in education, employment, social integration, and healthcare access between deaf and non-deaf migrants. This research employed quantitative methods including logistic regression and Mann–Whitney U tests to analyse data collected from both deaf and non-deaf migrant groups. The study adjusted for demographic variables to isolate the effects of hearing status on various outcomes. Findings indicate that deaf migrants are less likely to achieve higher educational levels and are employed at lower rates compared to non-deaf migrants. Additionally, deaf migrants reported significantly lower subjective social status and faced greater barriers in accessing healthcare services, attributed to communication difficulties and insufficient support systems. The results underscore significant disparities faced by deaf migrants in critical areas of life. These challenges are primarily due to systemic barriers and a lack of adequate resources and accommodations that address their specific needs. The study highlights the need for targeted policies and programs to enhance educational opportunities, employment support, social integration, and healthcare accessibility for deaf migrants, ensuring their successful integration and participation in society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The rapid adoption of telehealth services has been significantly accelerated by the need for accessible healthcare solutions, especially among older adults. However, the utilization of telehealth remains limited in many regions, including Saudi Arabia. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing telehealth adoption among older adults in Riyadh. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, involving semi-structured interviews with 25 participants aged 60 and above. Thematic analysis was utilized to analyze the data, allowing for the identification of key themes related to participants' experiences with telehealth services. Results: Four main themes emerged from the analysis: access to technology and connectivity, attitudes toward telehealth, support systems, and institutional and policy factors. Participants reported challenges such as low digital literacy and unreliable Internet access, along with the need for trust in healthcare providers. Family support and the desire for training resources were highlighted as important facilitators of telehealth utilization. Conclusions: The findings indicate that addressing barriers such as digital literacy and connectivity is crucial for enhancing telehealth utilization among older adults. Implementing strategies that promote education, strengthen support systems, and improve policy frameworks is essential for facilitating greater engagement with telehealth services in this demographic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rural health disparities in Texas impact population health due to limited healthcare access, insurance, and transportation challenges, especially in medically underserved areas. A shortage of specialists in rural regions worsens these issues, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates. Objective: Our research aimed to address a knowledge gap by investigating the availability of three medical specialists—cardiologists, pulmonologists, and endocrinologists—in rural counties of Texas and identifying areas where access to healthcare is limited. Methods: Utilizing data from regional, state, and federal sources, the analysis geocoded specialist locations and created GIS maps to visualize the distribution of specialists across Texas's 254 counties. Physician demand was calculated by considering disease incidence and population size, resulting in a county-level physician availability index to highlight areas with shortages. Results: Our findings demonstrate a significant deficiency of cardiologists in 196 counties when considering a maximum reasonable travel distance of 50 miles. Comparable deficiencies were observed for pulmonologists and endocrinologists, with western rural counties predominantly comprising the deficiency areas for each specialty. These results emphasize a significant rural–urban disparity concerning access to the three investigated health specialists. Conclusions: Addressing geographic disparities can reduce health inequities, improve rural healthcare access, and promote a more equitable healthcare system across Texas. Solutions may include incentives for specialists to work in underserved areas, expanded telemedicine services, and transportation assistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Disparity in kidney transplant access has been demonstrated by a disproportionately low rate of kidney transplantation in socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. However, the information is not from national representative populations with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We aim to examine whether socioeconomic disparity for kidney transplant access exists by utilizing data from the All of Us Research Program. Materials and Methods We analyzed data of adult ESKD patients using the All of Us Researcher Workbench. The association of socioeconomic data including types of health insurance, levels of education, and household incomes with kidney transplant access was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted by baseline demographic, medical comorbidities, and behavioral information. Results Among 4078 adults with ESKD, mean diagnosis age was 54 and 51.64% were male. The majority had Medicare (39.6%), were non-graduate college (75.79%), and earned $10 000-24 999 annual income (20.16%). After adjusting for potential confounders, insurance status emerged as a significant predictor of kidney transplant access. Individuals covered by Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.58; P -value <.001) or uninsured (AOR 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.37; P -value <.001) exhibited lower odds of transplantation compared to those with private insurance. Discussion/Conclusion Our findings reveal the influence of insurance status and socioeconomic factors on access to kidney transplantation among ESKD patients. Addressing these disparities through expanded insurance coverage and improved healthcare access is vital for promoting equitable treatment and enhancing health outcomes in vulnerable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background of study: Crack cocaine use in Ireland began to emerge as a significant problem in the early 2000s, with prevalence increasing from 2016 onwards. Services such as harm reduction, treatment/rehabilitation, primary healthcare and social services are available to crack cocaine users in Ireland. However, research addressing specific barriers to accessing these services remains limited. Internationally, while research on healthcare access barriers for crack cocaine users exists, it predominantly focuses on user perspectives. This paper uses a dual-perspective approach to investigate access challenges from both service user and service provider viewpoints, promoting a more patient-centred, holistic approach to service provision. Methodology: The study is qualitative and used semi-structured interviews and a focus group to obtain study data. Levesque's conceptual framework for healthcare access underpins this study. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The study highlighted barriers to healthcare access such as the inadequacy of services to support those with dual diagnosis. However, an advancement has been made through the establishment of specialised dual diagnosis teams and community dual diagnosis services in Ireland. Stigma from health care providers further hindered people from seeking help, highlighting the significance of ongoing efforts in Ireland to address stigma. Systemic factors such as distrust in services, stringent requirements and insufficient knowledge of user needs hamper timely access to care, underlining the need for more adaptive responses. Conclusion: The study underlines the need for a tailored approach to enhancing access to health care for crack cocaine users in Ireland. Facilitating collaboration among health care providers, fostering partnerships with educational institutions/communities, and implementing policy changes are essential in creating a supportive environment that promotes help-seeking in Ireland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Underserved populations both globally and in Canada face serious cancer inequities that result from systemic economic, environmental, and social conditions. These pose barriers in access to cancer care and lead to suboptimal cancer care experiences and outcomes. Knowledge of effective interventions to improve access to cancer care is needed to inform the design of tailored interventions for these populations. Aim: To identify interventions and programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations in high income countries with universal health coverage (UHC) and the United States (US) throughout the cancer care continuum. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria: quantitative and qualitative studies published in English in the last 10 years (2013–2023), describing interventions/programs to improve access to cancer care for underserved populations (18 years and over). We included studies in the US given the body of scholarship on equity in cancer care in that country. Screening, data extraction and analysis were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Results: Our search yielded 7,549 articles, and 74 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 56 were conducted in the US, 8 in Australia, 6 in Canada, and 4 in the United Kingdom. Most (90.5%) were quantitative studies and 47.3% were published between 2020–2023. Seven types of interventions were identified: patient navigation, education and counselling, virtual health, service redesign, financial support, improving geographical accessibility and multicomponent interventions. Interventions were mainly designed to mitigate language, distance, financial, lack of knowledge and cultural barriers. Most interventions focused on access to cancer screening, targeted rural populations, racialized groups and people with low socioeconomic status, and were conducted in community-based settings. The majority of interventions or programs significantly improved access to cancer care. Conclusion: Our systematic review findings suggest that interventions designed to remove specific barriers faced by underserved populations can improve access to cancer care. Few studies came from countries with UHC. Research is required to understand tailored interventions for underserved populations in countries with UHC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated substantial disruptions in healthcare utilization globally. In Japan, reduced healthcare utilization during the pandemic's early phases had been documented previously. However, few studies have investigated the impact of the pandemic's later stages (2022–2023) on healthcare utilization rates, particularly in the Japanese context. Methods: We employed a quasi-Poisson regression model, adapted from the FluMOMO framework, to analyze temporal trends in Japanese healthcare utilization throughout the pandemic until November 2023. We estimated inpatient and outpatient volumes and hospital length of stay by bed type (general and psychiatric). Results: In general hospital beds, inpatient volumes remained significantly below pre-pandemic levels for every month until November 2023, with a reduction of 7.8 percent in 2023 compared to pre-pandemic levels. Psychiatric inpatient volumes, which had been declining before the pandemic, continued this downward trend, with the average occupancy rate decreasing by approximately 5.3% to 81.3% in 2023 compared to pre-pandemic levels. Significantly reduced outpatient volumes for both general and psychiatric care, in addition to prolonged lengths of hospital stay for psychiatric beds, were observed sporadically for several months in 2022 and 2023, persisting beyond the cessation of state of emergency and quasi-state of emergency declarations. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally altered healthcare utilization patterns in Japan. We observed a sustained reduction in general and psychiatric inpatient volumes relative to pre-pandemic baselines nationwide. The prolonged impact on healthcare utilization patterns, persisting beyond emergency measures, warrants continued monitoring of service delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Multimorbidity, defined as two or more chronic diseases co-occurring in an individual, has been linked to elevated healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket expenses. Yet, the barriers to healthcare access due to the health profile of multimorbid adults are underexplored. This study investigates the differences in delayed healthcare due to cost among adults with multimorbidity and those with one chronic disease condition. Methods: Data from the National Health Interview Survey from the years 2016–2018 and 2020–2021 were examined. The sample included 13,439 adults with at least one of the chronic disease conditions outlined by the US Department of Health and Human Services. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odd ratios of delayed healthcare due to cost among participants. Results: Multimorbid adults were 1.29 times more likely to delay healthcare compared to adults living with one chronic disease (p < 0.01). Other influencing factors include being female, Asian, unmarried, uninsured, age, worsening self-rated health, region, and poverty threshold of 100–199%. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the disparities in healthcare success experienced by adults living with multimorbidity and indicate the need for policymakers to implement targeted measures such as subsidized costs for comorbidities to alleviate the financial burdens experienced by this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study investigates breast cancer screening disparities among Mexican immigrant women in rural and urban U.S. communities, focusing on cultural beliefs, healthcare access, and geographical differences. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 350 Mexican immigrant women aged 40+ without prior cancer diagnosis was conducted in rural (<2000 population) and urban parts of the U.S. in 2015. Culturally tailored surveys during household visits, clinic appointments, and community meetings assessed cultural beliefs, mammography engagement, and family support. Comparative analyses t -tests and chi-square tests were conducted, with significance set at P <.05. Results: Rural women demonstrated higher adherence to spiritualismo (M = 4.31, SD = 1.13) compared to their urban counterparts (M = 3.91, SD = 1.36), marianismo (M = 3.33, SD = 0.45 vs M = 3.21, SD = 0.48), and machismo (M = 3.02, SD = 0.52 vs M = 2.80, SD = 0.61). The rural women also reported higher mammography rates (54.4% vs 45.6%), with 60.4% undergoing four or more mammograms. Despite barriers such as doctor non-recommendation (55.0% rural vs 45.0% urban) and embarrassment (67.9% rural vs 32.1% urban), rural women engaged more in family discussions about cancer screenings (61.7% vs 38.3%) and received more family assistance in finding health information (59.8% vs 40.2%). Conclusions: This study elucidates significant rural-urban disparities in cultural adherence and family support among Mexican immigrant women, underscoring the necessity for culturally tailored interventions to enhance breast cancer screening rates and health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovarian cancer has poor 5-year survival, particularly among non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients. Efforts to identify patients at high-risk of functional limitations and frailty may improve outcomes. In this study, we examined how healthcare access (HCA) and race/ethnicity relate to frailty among patients with ovarian cancer. We identified Hispanic, NH Black, and NH White patients diagnosed at ages ≥6 5 years with ovarian cancer between 2009 and 2015 using SEER-Medicare. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between HCA and race/ethnicity with pre- or post-diagnosis frailty, adjusting for age and comorbidities. A total of 6041 patients with ovarian cancer were included, including 91.8% NH White, 6.6% NH Black, and 1.7% Hispanic. Pre-diagnosis, 14.7% of patients were defined as frail (NH White: 14.3%; NH Black: 17.9%; Hispanic: 20.8%). Post-diagnosis, frailty prevalence increased to 58.8% (NH White: 58.2%; NH Black: 65.2%; Hispanic: 70.2%). No statistically significant associations were observed between race/ethnicity and pre- or post-diagnosis frailty in fully adjusted models. After adjustment for patient characteristics and healthcare accessibility and availability, higher healthcare affordability was associated with a decreased prevalence of pre-diagnosis frailty (PR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.8 5, 0.98). Patients with ovarian cancer have a high prevalence of frailty after diagnosis, particularly NH Black and Hispanic patients. Improving healthcare affordability may prevent or help manage frailty in Medicare patients, improve receipt of cancer treatment, and increase cancer survival. • This study examined how healthcare access and race/ethnicity are related to frailty in ovarian cancer patients. • Prior to diagnosis, about 15% of patients were defined as frail, which increased to nearly 60% in the year after diagnosis. • Higher healthcare affordability was associated with a reduced prevalence of frailty prior to diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study examined the spatial distribution and factors associated with health insurance subscription among women in Ghana. Methods We analysed a representative sample of 9380 women aged 15–49 y from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. Descriptive and multilevel regression analyses were performed. The study also employed spatial analysis techniques, including spatial autocorrelation, hotspot analysis, cluster and outlier analysis, as well as geographically weighted regression to explore the geographic distribution and predictors of non-subscription to health insurance. Results The analysis revealed a moderately high prevalence of health insurance subscription among women in Ghana (62.4%). The spatial analyses indicated substantial variations in health insurance subscription across different regions in Ghana. The coastal and middle zones reported higher rates of non-subscription compared with the northern zone. We observed that young women (aged 20–24 y) had a lower likelihood of subscribing compared with adolescent girls (aged 15–19 y). Also, higher educational attainment, listening to the radio, being in a marital union and higher wealth status were positively associated with health insurance subscription. Conclusions The study calls for targeted interventions and policies to promote equitable access to healthcare services, focusing on improving health infrastructure in coastal and middle zones, educational campaigns for individuals with lower education levels, leveraging media platforms for health insurance awareness and implementing equitable and affordable processes for individuals in poorer households. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Healthcare disparities influence multiple dimensions of orthopaedic care including access, burden and incidence of disease, and outcome in varying populations. These disparities impact healthcare at both the micro and macro scale of the healthcare experience from individual patient-physician relationships to reimbursement rates across the United States. This article provides a review of how healthcare disparities contribute to the landscape of orthopaedic care and specifically highlights how disparities affect outpatient visits, discretionary and unplanned surgical care, and postoperative outcomes. Recent Findings: Current research demonstrates the widespread presence of healthcare disparities in the field of orthopaedics and gives both objective and subjective evidence confirming disparities' measurable influence. The disparities most highlighted by our review include differences in orthopaedic care based on insurance type and race. Summary: Currently disparities in orthopaedic care are deeply connected to patient insurance status and race. In the outpatient setting insurance significantly impacts access to care, travel burden, and utilization of services. The emergent setting is similarly influenced with measurable differences in lack of access to acute care, rates of inappropriate triage, and timeliness of care based on insurance status and race. Additionally, the postoperative period is not immune to disparities with likelihood of follow up, experience of catastrophic medical expenses, and postoperative outcomes also being affected. Addressing these disparities is a pressing need and may include solutions like wider expansion and acceptance of publicly funded insurance and the development of readily available and easily measurable metrics for healthcare equity and quality in vulnerable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plain English Summary: In the United Kingdom, people can access public funding for In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment if certain criteria are met. Funding restrictions differ between geographical areas, but most areas restrict treatment to women with a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 30. This study explores the unexpected and unintended harms experienced by women restricted from NHS-funded IVF due to these BMI criteria. Posts from a popular infertility online forum were collected and thematically analysed. The study found moralising discourses around body weight which emphasized that women had personal control over their bodies and needed to 'work' to change their bodies to show deservingness for treatment. We conclude that NHS-IVF policies in the UK overlook the emotional and moral burdens placed on individuals due to rigid BMI criteria. As the impact of BMI limits on healthcare access is an under-researched topic, we believe this work is important for demonstrating the harms of BMI-restrictive policies. Background: Across the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), women with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of > 30 face restrictions accessing In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment. This study asks: what are the (un)expected and (un)intended harms and consequences experienced by women restricted from accessing NHS-funded IVF due to BMI threshold criteria? Methods: Posts from a popular infertility online forum were collected and reflexively thematically analysed. Results: On the forum, users discussed how they struggled to lose weight, how they faced time pressures to meet BMI thresholds, and they shared knowledge on how to comply or appear compliant with BMI cut-offs. Our study found widespread moral discourses around body weight were reproduced in the forum, particularly commonplace narratives that body weight is under personal control, that people with a high BMI should 'work' to change their bodies, and that this work helps demonstrate deservingness for IVF treatment. Moralising discourses around weight were linked to the responsibilities of a hoped-for future of motherhood, as users performed deservingness through emphasising their commitment to meeting the BMI threshold. Conclusion: We conclude that NHS-IVF policies in the United Kingdom do not consider the burdensome emotional and moral work placed on people seeking treatment due to inflexible upper-limit BMI criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long COVID-19 challenges health and social systems globally. International research finds major inequalities in prevalence and healthcare utilization as patients describe difficulties with accessing health care. In order to improve long-term outcomes it is vital to understand any underlying access barriers, for which relevant evidence on long COVID-19 is thus far lacking in a universal healthcare system like Austria. This study aims to comprehensively identify access barriers and facilitators faced by long COVID-19 patients in Austria and explore potential socioeconomic and demographic drivers in health and social care access. Methods: Applying an exploratory qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 experts including medical professionals and senior health officials as well as focus groups with 18 patients with confirmed long COVID-19 diagnosis reflecting varying participant characteristics (age, gender, urbanicity, occupation, education, insurance status) (July-Nov 2023). Data were analysed following a thematic framework approach, drawing on a comprehensive 'access to health care' model. Results: Based on expert and patient experiences, several access barriers and facilitators emerged along all dimensions of the model. Main themes included scepticism and stigma by medical professionals, difficulties in finding knowledgeable doctors, limited specialist capacities in the ambulatory care sector, long waiting times for specialist care, and limited statutory health insurance coverage of treatments resulting in high out-of-pocket payments. Patients experienced constant self-organization of their patient pathway as stressful, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary care and centralized coordination. Facilitators included supportive social environments, telemedicine, and informal information provided by a nationwide patient-led support group. Differences in patient experiences emerged, among others, as women and younger patients faced gender- and age-based stigmatization. Complementary health insurance reduced the financial strain, however, did not ease capacity constraints, which were particularly challenging for those living in rural areas. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate a call for action to improve the long COVID-19 situation in Austria by empowering both providers and patients via increased information offerings, strengthened interdisciplinary treatment structures and telemedicine offerings as well as research funding. Our insights on potentially relevant socioeconomic and demographic drivers in access barriers lay the necessary foundation for future quantitative inequality research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Telemedicine holds immense potential to revolutionise healthcare delivery, particularly in resource-limited settings and for patients with chronic diseases. Despite proven benefits and policy reforms, the use of telemedicine remains low due to several patient, technology, and system-level barriers. Assisted telemedicine employs trained health professionals to connect patients with physicians, which can improve access and scope of telemedicine. The study aims to describe the design, service utilisation and chronic disease outcomes following the implementation of an assisted telemedicine initiative. Methods: This is an observational implementation study. Barriers and potential solutions to the implementation of telemedicine were identified through interviews with key stakeholders. The assisted telemedicine solution using an interoperable platform integrating electronic health records, point-of-care diagnostics, and electronic clinical decision support systems was designed and piloted at three telemedicine clinics in Tamil Nadu, India. Nurses were trained in platform use and facilitation of tele-consultations. Health records of all patients from March 2021 to June 2023 were included in the analysis. Data were analysed to assess the utilisation of clinic services and improvements in health outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Results: Over 2.4 years, 11,388 patients with a mean age of 45 (± 20) years and median age of 48 years, predominantly female (59.3%), accessed the clinics. The team completed 15,437 lab investigations and 26,998 consultations. Among 5542 (48.6%) patients that reported chronic conditions, diabetes mellitus (61%) and hypertension (45%) were the most frequent. In patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, 43% and 75.3% were newly diagnosed, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension patients had significant reductions in fasting blood sugar (-33.0 mg/dL (95% CI (-42.4, -23.7, P < 0.001)), and systolic (-9.6 mmHg (95% CI (-12.1, -7.0), P < 0.0001)) and diastolic blood pressure (-5.5 mmHg (95% CI (-7.0, -4.08), P < 0.0001)) at nine months from first visit, respectively. Conclusions: The 'Digisahayam' model demonstrated feasibility in enhancing healthcare accessibility and quality by bridging healthcare gaps, diagnosing chronic conditions, and improving patient outcomes. The model presents a scalable and sustainable approach to revolutionising patient care and achieving digital health equity, with the potential for adaptation in similar settings worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Accurate and timely diagnosis of dementia is necessary to allow affected individuals to make informed decisions and access appropriate resources. When dementia goes undetected until a hospitalization or nursing home stay, this could reflect delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, and may reflect underlying disparities in healthcare access.In this retrospective cohort study, we used 2012–2020 Medicare claims and other administrative data to examine variation in setting of dementia diagnosis among fee‐for‐service Medicare beneficiaries with an initial claims‐based dementia diagnosis in 2016. We used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the association of person and geographic factors with diagnosis location, and Cox proportional hazards regression to examine 4‐year survival relative to diagnosis location.Among 754,204 Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with dementia in 2016, 60.3% were diagnosed in the community, 17.2% in hospitals, and 22.5% in nursing homes. Adjusted 4‐year survival rates were significantly lower among those diagnosed in hospitals [−16.1 percentage points (95% CI: −17.0, −15.1)] and nursing homes [−16.8 percentage points (95% CI: −17.7, −15.9)], compared to those diagnosed in the community. Community‐diagnosed beneficiaries were more often female, younger, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American or Alaskan Native, Hispanic, had fewer baseline hospitalizations and higher homecare use, and resided in wealthier ZIP codes. Rural beneficiaries were more likely to be diagnosed in hospitals.Many older adults are diagnosed with dementia in a hospital or nursing home. These individuals have significantly lower survival than those diagnosed in the community, which may indicate diagnosis during an acute illness or care transition, or at a later disease stage, all of which are suboptimal. These results highlight the need for improved dementia screening in the general population, particularly for individuals in rural areas and communities with higher social deprivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020, Switzerland restricted non-urgent healthcare services to safeguard capacity. While prioritization of care was supposed to be driven by medical urgency, demographic factors or economic incentives might have influenced the hospitals' resource allocation decisions. Objectives: This study investigates potential determinants of procedure prioritization in hospitalized patients during the lockdown period. Design: Quasi-experimental retrospective study of hospital data in Switzerland. Methods: We analyzed 496 456 adult patients with known insurance status and a recorded procedure, admitted for cardiovascular, orthopedic/musculoskeletal or oncological reasons from January 2017 (3 years before the COVID-19 outbreak) to mid-April 2020 (in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic), to obtain admission rate ratios (ARRs, "lockdown" admission rates divided by "normal" rates) from negative binomial regression analysis of fortnightly admissions for frequent procedure-diagnosis combinations. Quade and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared ARRs between sex×age, insurance and comorbidity strata. Results: Admission rates showed significant reductions for 29 of 53 procedure-diagnosis combinations. Reductions varied strongly by emergency, with largest decreases in orthopedic procedures for arthrosis (osteoarthritis) and non-arthritic joint disorders, and the smallest in cerebral imaging for stroke patients and surgical procedures for malignant neoplasms. The only difference in ARRs between strata was a stronger decrease in admission rates for cardiovascular combinations for patients with private versus basic health insurance. Conclusion: While medical procedures were affected to varying degrees by the ban on non-urgent healthcare during the COVID-19 lockdown, we found no robust evidence that factors other than medical urgency influenced healthcare prioritization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People who use drugs (PWUD) often face restricted healthcare access despite their heightened healthcare needs. Factors such as stigma, mistrust of the healthcare system, competing priorities, and geographical barriers pose significant healthcare access challenges. Telehealth offers an innovative solution to expand healthcare access for better inclusion of underserved populations in healthcare. We aimed to explore PWUDs' perceptions of telehealth as a healthcare delivery modality. Methods: We utilized purposive sampling to recruit participants (N = 57) for nine focus group discussions (FGDs) in Athens, Greece. Eligibility criteria required participants to be at least 18 years, with current or prior injection drug use, and current internet access. The FGDs followed a semi-structured interview guide, were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and de-identified. We applied thematic analysis to analyze FGD transcripts. Results: Participants' mean (standard deviation) age was 47.9 (8.9) years, 89.5% (51/57) were male, 91.2% (52/57) were of Greek origin, and 61.4% (35/57) had attended at least 10 years of school. Three main themes emerged from the FGDs: (1) high internet utilization for healthcare-related purposes among PWUD, (2) highlighting telehealth benefits despite access obstacles and PWUDs' concerns about diagnostic accuracy, and (3) approaches to overcome access obstacles and build digital trust. Participants extensively used the internet for healthcare-related processes, such as accessing healthcare information and scheduling provider appointments. Despite being telehealth-inexperienced, most participants expressed a strong willingness to embrace telehealth due to its perceived convenience, time-saving nature, and trusted digital environment. Some participants recognized that the inability to conduct physical examinations through telehealth reduces its diagnostic accuracy, while others expressed concerns about digital literacy and technological infrastructure accessibility. Most participants expressed a preference for video-based telehealth encounters over audio-only encounters. To build trust in telehealth and promote patient-centeredness, participants recommended an initial in-person visit, virtual eye contact during telehealth encounters, patient education, and partnerships with PWUD-supportive community organizations equipped with appropriate infrastructure. Conclusions: PWUD frequently use the internet for health-related purposes and suggested several approaches to enhance virtual trust. Their insights and suggestions are practical guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance healthcare access for underserved populations through telehealth. Trial registration: NCT05794984. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Venezuelan migration has experienced an unprecedented increase in the last decade, with approximately 7.7 million Venezuelan-born individuals residing in other countries as of 2024. Our study aims to identify the potential and actual demand for healthcare services (SRH) in the Venezuelan diaspora's four primary destinations within the Andean Countries: Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Methods: Using official data from administrative records, censuses, and sample surveys reported by the host countries and international agencies, we estimate the annual evolution of Venezuelan-born women of reproductive age (WRA) and their offspring. Additionally, we conduct two case studies focusing on Colombia and Chile to analyse the groups most vulnerable to unmet health needs. Results: The population of WRA has increased to between 5 and 6.8%, and births have risen to approximately 3–8% in host countries due to Venezuelan migration. Yet, we found a general decrease in health coverage for certain age groups of Venezuelan female migrants in host countries for the period 2017–2022, particularly in Chile. By 2022, an estimated 20% of healthcare needs remained unmet among children, girls, and younger Venezuelan women, contributing to greater health inequalities between Venezuelan-born adolescents and those from other countries of birth. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the escalating demand for and limited access to healthcare services among Venezuelan WRA in their destinations. Unmet healthcare needs are particularly prevalent among younger women by 2022, underscoring the urgency for health system to incorporate gender-responsive, equitable interventions and ensuring health rights for high-risk migrant groups such as infants, children, adolescents, and younger women. Addressing these challenges remains a critical task for the regional public health agenda in Latin America. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Kuwait has a large expatriate community who experience both restricted access to public health services and lower income than Kuwaiti citizens. Given these conditions, we examined differences in characteristics and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) between Kuwaitis and expatriates. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data for adult CKD Stages 3–5 not on dialysis (CKD 3–5 ND) patients with native kidneys attending nephrology clinics in all Ministry of Health hospitals collected from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Cohort was then divided into Kuwaiti patients and expatriates patients for comparison. Results: We collected data from 2,610 patients (eGFR: 30.8 ml/min/1.73m2; age: 62.6 years; males: 56.7%; Kuwaitis: 62.1%). Kuwaitis were older (63.94 vs. 60.3 years, p < 0.001), with lower mean eGFR (30.4 vs. 31.5 ml/min/1.73m2, p = 0.052) than non-Kuwaitis, however, Kuwaitis had lower mean blood pressure (137.2/76.5 vs. 139.1/78.9 mmHg, p = 0.006), lower HbA1c in diabetics (7.59 vs. 7.82%, p = 0.010), and better lipid profile despite higher body mass indexes (29.6 vs. 28.9 kg/m2, p = 0.002). Both groups had high diabetes mellitus and hypertension rates. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were used in only 22.6% and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in only 46.2%. Conclusion: CKD 3–5 ND is caused by diabetes mellitus in 56.6% of cases, and the majority have hypertension. In our study, non-Kuwaitis had higher eGFR; however, restricted public healthcare access and lower income can lead to an unhealthy diet and suboptimal care, which may cause higher blood pressure, higher HbA1c, and a higher dyslipidemia rate. RAASi and SGLT2i utilization must increase to combat CKD, and antihypertensive selection must improve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aims to determine clusters of access to healthcare among adults with rare diseases in Switzerland, identify associated individual characteristics of access, and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Swiss adults (N = 341) diagnosed with a rare disease completed an online survey including the Perception of Access to Healthcare Questionnaire (PAHQ) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). We employed partition around medoids algorithm to identify patient clusters based on the PAHQ. Various sociodemographic/disease-related factors and HRQoL were assessed. Results: We identified two patient clusters: higher (n = 227) and lower access (n = 114). Significantly associated with lower access were an unstable disease course (p < 0.05), increased number of misdiagnoses (p < 0.05), and diseases affecting the nervous system (p < 0.01). Membership in the lower access cluster was significantly associated with worse HRQoL (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Findings highlight the need for comprehensive assessment of healthcare access in adults with rare diseases and identifies potential targets for tailored interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals identify universal access to sexual and reproductive health services as a global priority. Yet barriers to abortion access remain, including legal restrictions, cost, stigma, and limited services and information. The aim was to identify barriers to and facilitators of abortion care access experienced in Australia. Methods: This qualitative phenomenological study examined abortion access in Australia, where abortion is decriminalised, from March 2020 to December 2022. We used social media and flyers in clinics to recruit adults who had sought abortion care, then interviewed them in-depth. We mapped participant experiences to five dimensions of access identified by Levesque et al.'s patient-centred access to healthcare framework: approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness. Results: The 24 participants lived across Australia and sought abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approachability: Before seeking abortion, most did not know where to access information about the service and where to obtain it. Acceptability: Many were uncomfortable disclosing their abortion to family or friends; they reported that healthcare providers demonstrated varying levels of support. Availability and accommodation: Regional participants travelled far and faced long wait-times, exacerbated by pandemic restrictions. Affordability: Participants described financial stress paying for the service, travel, and related expenses. Appropriateness: Most participants expected judgemental care. Experiences varied widely: many participants experienced unempathetic, rushed, or judgemental interactions with healthcare staff, and many also reported at least one non-judgmental and supportive interaction on the same pathway to care. Discussion: Abortion seekers experienced varying obstacles when seeking care. The findings illustrate the need for population- and system-level initiatives such as: providing accurate information about and normalising abortion; implementing system-level strategies to reduce wait times, travel, and costs, especially for rural populations; and developing regulatory and quality improvement initiatives to increase the workforce and its readiness to provide high-quality, non-judgemental abortion care. Challenges seeking care during pandemic restrictions illustrate the importance of social support during care and choice between abortion modalities and service types. Consumer voices can help understand the diverse pathways to abortion care and inform solutions to overcome the multidimensional barriers to access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abortion is among the most widely disagreed upon topics in bioethics and healthcare. Consider how abortion is taught to medical students: while some medical schools incorporate abortion into their standard curriculum, others omit it entirely. In this article, the author argues these discrepancies go against society's interest in producing physicians with comprehensive medical knowledge—especially for common procedures like abortions. The author thus argues all US medical schools have a moral obligation to provide abortion education and clinical training opportunities to their students. For the sake of argumentation, the author attempts to justify this claim remaining morally neutral on abortion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Evidence examines how persons experiencing Long COVID (LC) struggle to secure healthcare for symptoms. However, few studies examine healthcare workers experiencing LC, nor the complex and multiple difficulties faced when seeking and receiving healthcare. Methods: This study is based on two phases of longitudinally conducted qualitative interviews, 6 months apart, with National Health Service (NHS) workers experiencing LC, from different occupational roles at NHS locales in Scotland (first interviews, n = 50; second interviews, n = 44). Results: Multiple factors restricted healthcare access, including worries about pressuring the NHS and concerns over LC being legitimised. When healthcare was sought, workers struggled to secure support, referrals and treatment. The following reasons were included: (1) context: the restrictive pandemic healthcare context; (2) illness climate: low GP knowledge surrounding LC and how this could be treated, trends for ascribing symptoms to other causes and reluctance to diagnose LC; (3) sense‐making of LC: healthcare availability linked to occupational role identity. To visualise and examine healthcare barriers, candidacy theory is applied, drawing inferences between healthcare context, illness climate, sense‐making and identities. Conclusion: NHS workers' complex journeys represent Disrupted Candidacy, intersecting challenges across candidacy domains, restricting the seeking and receiving of LC healthcare. Findings provide insights into why NHS workers resisted and withdrew from healthcare‐seeking, and the barriers they faced when attempting to secure LC support. This study presents a pathway for future LC illness research to use a modified candidacy theory framework. Patient and Public Contribution: This research focuses on amplifying and learning from lived experiences, and the voices of NHS workers in Scotland experiencing LC. Interviews represent primary data for this study; thus, participants and their healthcare journeys are centred in this research and all aspects of production, reporting and output. Explicit discussions of stakeholder group involvement are highlighted in the methods section. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although behavioral interventions have been effective in gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, barriers exist in implementing these interventions into clinical practice. The majority of previously published studies have focused on workforce limitations and have not considered individual and social determinants of health (SDoH) factors that can impact engagement in GI behavioral healthcare. Aims: To characterize barriers to engagement in appointment attendance and health management, explore individual and SDoH factors impacting GI behavioral healthcare engagement, and identify barriers that occur more often for patients with SDoH-related vulnerability (low health literacy and/or financial insecurity). Methods: A survey was distributed to adult patients who had been seen in Gastroenterology at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center from June 2022 to December 2022. Results: One hundred participants [mean age = 58 years, 57.1% women] completed the survey. SDoH vulnerability was present in 32.3% of the population. For the entire sample, 73% reported at least one barrier to accessing care and 75% reported at least one factor which impacted health management. Those with SDoH vulnerability reported significantly more barriers to attending appointments and to managing health. In addition, they were significantly more likely to endorse physical health problems, difficulty affording medical bills, pain, mobility issues, trauma experiences, significant stress, and difficulty with concentration. Conclusions: Patients in a GI clinic reported multiple barriers to accessing care and participating in health management. Innovative, multi-level strategies are needed to address barriers to ensure that all patients are able to obtain quality GI behavioral health services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Phuket Province is a major tourist destination with a migrant workforce accounting for 10% of its population. Despite governmental efforts to adjust health insurance policies, migrants face healthcare access challenges. This study examines the current healthcare access situation and factors associated with unmet needs among migrants in Phuket Province. Methods: We used a cross-sectional mixed-methods approach, recruiting participants through snowball sampling from the Migrant Health Volunteer Network. Quantitative data were gathered using self-administered questionnaires, with unmet need defined as desired outpatient or recommended inpatient services not received at government hospitals. Multivariable logistic regression identified unmet need predictors, and we assessed the mediating effect of health insurance status. Qualitative data from three focus groups on healthcare access provided context and enriched the quantitative findings. Results: This study includes 296 migrants mainly from Myanmar. The overall unmet need prevalence was 14.86%, mainly attributed to having undocumented status (34.09%), affordability issues (20.45%), and language barriers (18.18%). Working in the fishery industry significantly increased unmet needs risk (aOR 2.68, 95% CI 1.08–6.62). Undocumented status contributed a marginal total effect of 4.86 (95% CI 1.62–14.54), with a natural indirect effect through uninsured status of only 1.16 (95% CI 0.88–1.52). Focus group participants used various medical resources, with insured individuals preferring hospital care, but faced obstacles due to undocumented status and language barriers. Conclusion: Valid legal documents, including work permits and visas, are crucial for healthcare access. Attention to fishery industry practices is needed. We recommend stakeholder discussions to streamline the process of obtaining and maintaining these documents for migrant workers. These improvements could enhance health insurance acquisition and ultimately improve healthcare affordability for this population. These insights could be applied to migrant workers in other urban and suburban area of Thailand regarding access to government healthcare facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effectiveness of telemedicine by a patient's own primary care provider (PCP) versus another available PCP is understudied. Objective: Examine the association between primary care visit modality with timeliness and follow-up in-person healthcare, including variation by visits with the patient's own PCP versus another PCP. Design and Participants: Cohort study including primary care visits in a large, integrated delivery system in 2022. Measures: Outcomes included timeliness (visit completed within 7 days of scheduling) and in-person follow-up (PCP visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations) within 7 days of the index PCP visit. Logistic regression measured the association between visit modality (in-person, video, and audio-only telemedicine) with the patient's own PCP or another PCP and outcomes, adjusting for characteristics. Key Results: Among 4,817,317 primary care visits, 59% were in-person, 27% audio-only, and 14% video telemedicine. Most (71.3%) were with the patient's own PCP. Telemedicine visits were timelier, with modality having a larger association for visits with patient's own PCP versus another PCP (P < 0.001). For visits with patient's own PCPs, return office visit rates were 1.2% for in-person, 5.3% for video, and 6.1% for audio-only. For another PCP, rates were 2.2% for in-person, 7.3% for video, and 8.1% for audio. Follow-up ED visits ranged from 1.4% (in-person) to 1.6% (audio-only) with own PCP, compared to 1.9% (in-person) to 2.3% (audio-only) with another PCP. Differences in return office and ED visits between in-person and telemedicine were larger for visits with another PCP compared to their own PCP (P < 0.001). Follow-up hospitalizations were rare, ranging from 0.19% (in-person with own PCP) to 0.32% (video with another PCP). Conclusion: Differences in return office and ED visits between in-person and telemedicine were larger when patients saw a less familiar PCP compared to their own PCP, reinforcing the importance of care continuity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vitiligo is an autoimmune skin depigmenting disorder that can negatively impact quality of life. A new FDA approved treatment for vitiligo offers considerable promise, and to maximize benefits strategies to implementation should consider disease burden, healthcare access, and healthcare utilization of individuals with vitiligo. Using the All of Us Research Program’s large data set, including survey responses, we investigated these outcomes among participants with and without vitiligo. Our analysis used quality of life, delayed care due to an obstacle, and seeing a doctor in the past year as dichotomized proxies for disease burden, healthcare access, and healthcare utilization. The results show that people with vitiligo are more likely to report worse quality of life but ostensibly greater healthcare access and utilization compared to people without vitiligo. However, these relationships are not significant when adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, and comorbidities of vitiligo. Prior research has shown non-Caucasian individuals have worse health outcomes in general, and worse quality of life within the vitiligo population. Our data demonstrated consistent findings; moreover, we found that non-Caucasian individuals with vitiligo had inferior healthcare access and lower health care utilization than Caucasian individuals. Implementation of new treatments for vitiligo should prioritize disadvantaged individuals to improve health equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background of study Crack cocaine use in Ireland began to emerge as a significant problem in the early 2000s, with prevalence increasing from 2016 onwards. Services such as harm reduction, treatment/rehabilitation, primary healthcare and social services are available to crack cocaine users in Ireland. However, research addressing specific barriers to accessing these services remains limited. Internationally, while research on healthcare access barriers for crack cocaine users exists, it predominantly focuses on user perspectives. This paper uses a dual-perspective approach to investigate access challenges from both service user and service provider viewpoints, promoting a more patient-centred, holistic approach to service provision. Methodology The study is qualitative and used semi-structured interviews and a focus group to obtain study data. Levesque’s conceptual framework for healthcare access underpins this study. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results The study highlighted barriers to healthcare access such as the inadequacy of services to support those with dual diagnosis. However, an advancement has been made through the establishment of specialised dual diagnosis teams and community dual diagnosis services in Ireland. Stigma from health care providers further hindered people from seeking help, highlighting the significance of ongoing efforts in Ireland to address stigma. Systemic factors such as distrust in services, stringent requirements and insufficient knowledge of user needs hamper timely access to care, underlining the need for more adaptive responses. Conclusion The study underlines the need for a tailored approach to enhancing access to health care for crack cocaine users in Ireland. Facilitating collaboration among health care providers, fostering partnerships with educational institutions/communities, and implementing policy changes are essential in creating a supportive environment that promotes help-seeking in Ireland.

Background. Ongoing military conflicts in various regions of the world have a significant negative impact on women’s health, including access to health services, maternal mortality and general well-being. Objective of the review: to provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted impact of war on refugee women, highlighting key areas such as physical health, mental health, reproductive health and access to basic services. Analysis of literary data. Numerous barriers faced by women in armed conflict are considered. The main problems include insufficient transport connections, financial constraints, poor quality of medical services and cultural norms. The destruction of the health care infrastructure, the lack of medicines and personnel significantly limit the availability of reproductive health care services. These factors contribute to an increase in the number of home births without qualified support, which increases the risk of maternal and child mortality. Also important is the psychological impact of war, including stress, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, which are common among pregnant women. In addition, malnutrition and environmental toxins further complicate the situation, undermining the health of women and newborns. Thus, conflict-induced food insecurity leads to malnutrition among pregnant and lactating women, causing adverse health outcomes such as anemia, low birth weight, and increased susceptibility to infections. Exposure to environmental toxins from modern weapons, such as heavy metals, poses long-term health risks to pregnant women and their babies. In particular, toxins can affect the emotional and cognitive development of children. Conclusions. This review highlights the urgent need for comprehensive health services, integrated medical and psychosocial support, and targeted interventions to address these challenges. Improving access to quality health care, ensuring food security and mitigating environmental risks are critical to improving maternal and child health.

Abstract Background Despite Ghana’s Persons with Disability Act, 2006 (Act 715) making provisions for access to healthcare services for adolescents with disabilities and their families, a corpus of literature has reported that persons with disabilities continue to face challenges in accessing healthcare services. However, the voices of adolescents with disabilities and their families are very scarce in such discourse. This study explored the experiences of adolescents with disabilities and their families in accessing healthcare services as per the provisions described in Ghana’s Act 715. Methods This study involved 45 participants, including 25 adolescents with disabilities and 20 family members from a municipality in Ghana. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted which was then analyzed thematically and interpreted using Critical Disability Theory. Results The study identified two major categories of barriers to healthcare access: environmental (socio-economic difficulties, poor built environment, unavailability of rehabilitation services) and systemic (cultural beliefs, poor support at healthcare facilities and inadequate healthcare legislative provisions for families of children with disabilities). Despite legal provisions for free healthcare, participants faced significant financial barriers, with specialist services often not covered by the National Health Insurance Scheme. Conclusions The study calls for policy adjustments to fully cover specialist care under Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme, establishment of local-level health assessment and resource centers, educational campaigns to change cultural perceptions, and training of healthcare workers to promote quality access to healthcare.

Plain English Summary In the United Kingdom, people can access public funding for In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment if certain criteria are met. Funding restrictions differ between geographical areas, but most areas restrict treatment to women with a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 30. This study explores the unexpected and unintended harms experienced by women restricted from NHS-funded IVF due to these BMI criteria. Posts from a popular infertility online forum were collected and thematically analysed. The study found moralising discourses around body weight which emphasized that women had personal control over their bodies and needed to ‘work’ to change their bodies to show deservingness for treatment. We conclude that NHS-IVF policies in the UK overlook the emotional and moral burdens placed on individuals due to rigid BMI criteria. As the impact of BMI limits on healthcare access is an under-researched topic, we believe this work is important for demonstrating the harms of BMI-restrictive policies.

Abstract Background Long COVID-19 challenges health and social systems globally. International research finds major inequalities in prevalence and healthcare utilization as patients describe difficulties with accessing health care. In order to improve long-term outcomes it is vital to understand any underlying access barriers, for which relevant evidence on long COVID-19 is thus far lacking in a universal healthcare system like Austria. This study aims to comprehensively identify access barriers and facilitators faced by long COVID-19 patients in Austria and explore potential socioeconomic and demographic drivers in health and social care access. Methods Applying an exploratory qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 experts including medical professionals and senior health officials as well as focus groups with 18 patients with confirmed long COVID-19 diagnosis reflecting varying participant characteristics (age, gender, urbanicity, occupation, education, insurance status) (July-Nov 2023). Data were analysed following a thematic framework approach, drawing on a comprehensive ‘access to health care’ model. Results Based on expert and patient experiences, several access barriers and facilitators emerged along all dimensions of the model. Main themes included scepticism and stigma by medical professionals, difficulties in finding knowledgeable doctors, limited specialist capacities in the ambulatory care sector, long waiting times for specialist care, and limited statutory health insurance coverage of treatments resulting in high out-of-pocket payments. Patients experienced constant self-organization of their patient pathway as stressful, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary care and centralized coordination. Facilitators included supportive social environments, telemedicine, and informal information provided by a nationwide patient-led support group. Differences in patient experiences emerged, among others, as women and younger patients faced gender- and age-based stigmatization. Complementary health insurance reduced the financial strain, however, did not ease capacity constraints, which were particularly challenging for those living in rural areas. Conclusions The findings of this study indicate a call for action to improve the long COVID-19 situation in Austria by empowering both providers and patients via increased information offerings, strengthened interdisciplinary treatment structures and telemedicine offerings as well as research funding. Our insights on potentially relevant socioeconomic and demographic drivers in access barriers lay the necessary foundation for future quantitative inequality research.

Abstract Background Telemedicine holds immense potential to revolutionise healthcare delivery, particularly in resource-limited settings and for patients with chronic diseases. Despite proven benefits and policy reforms, the use of telemedicine remains low due to several patient, technology, and system-level barriers. Assisted telemedicine employs trained health professionals to connect patients with physicians, which can improve access and scope of telemedicine. The study aims to describe the design, service utilisation and chronic disease outcomes following the implementation of an assisted telemedicine initiative. Methods This is an observational implementation study. Barriers and potential solutions to the implementation of telemedicine were identified through interviews with key stakeholders. The assisted telemedicine solution using an interoperable platform integrating electronic health records, point-of-care diagnostics, and electronic clinical decision support systems was designed and piloted at three telemedicine clinics in Tamil Nadu, India. Nurses were trained in platform use and facilitation of tele-consultations. Health records of all patients from March 2021 to June 2023 were included in the analysis. Data were analysed to assess the utilisation of clinic services and improvements in health outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Results Over 2.4 years, 11,388 patients with a mean age of 45 (± 20) years and median age of 48 years, predominantly female (59.3%), accessed the clinics. The team completed 15,437 lab investigations and 26,998 consultations. Among 5542 (48.6%) patients that reported chronic conditions, diabetes mellitus (61%) and hypertension (45%) were the most frequent. In patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, 43% and 75.3% were newly diagnosed, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension patients had significant reductions in fasting blood sugar (-33.0 mg/dL (95% CI (-42.4, -23.7, P

Abstract Introduction Kuwait has a large expatriate community who experience both restricted access to public health services and lower income than Kuwaiti citizens. Given these conditions, we examined differences in characteristics and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) between Kuwaitis and expatriates. Methods Clinical and laboratory data for adult CKD Stages 3–5 not on dialysis (CKD 3–5 ND) patients with native kidneys attending nephrology clinics in all Ministry of Health hospitals collected from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Cohort was then divided into Kuwaiti patients and expatriates patients for comparison. Results We collected data from 2,610 patients (eGFR: 30.8 ml/min/1.73m2; age: 62.6 years; males: 56.7%; Kuwaitis: 62.1%). Kuwaitis were older (63.94 vs. 60.3 years, p

Abstract Background Venezuelan migration has experienced an unprecedented increase in the last decade, with approximately 7.7 million Venezuelan-born individuals residing in other countries as of 2024. Our study aims to identify the potential and actual demand for healthcare services (SRH) in the Venezuelan diaspora’s four primary destinations within the Andean Countries: Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Chile. Methods Using official data from administrative records, censuses, and sample surveys reported by the host countries and international agencies, we estimate the annual evolution of Venezuelan-born women of reproductive age (WRA) and their offspring. Additionally, we conduct two case studies focusing on Colombia and Chile to analyse the groups most vulnerable to unmet health needs. Results The population of WRA has increased to between 5 and 6.8%, and births have risen to approximately 3–8% in host countries due to Venezuelan migration. Yet, we found a general decrease in health coverage for certain age groups of Venezuelan female migrants in host countries for the period 2017–2022, particularly in Chile. By 2022, an estimated 20% of healthcare needs remained unmet among children, girls, and younger Venezuelan women, contributing to greater health inequalities between Venezuelan-born adolescents and those from other countries of birth. Conclusions Our findings highlight the escalating demand for and limited access to healthcare services among Venezuelan WRA in their destinations. Unmet healthcare needs are particularly prevalent among younger women by 2022, underscoring the urgency for health system to incorporate gender-responsive, equitable interventions and ensuring health rights for high-risk migrant groups such as infants, children, adolescents, and younger women. Addressing these challenges remains a critical task for the regional public health agenda in Latin America.

Abstract Background People who use drugs (PWUD) often face restricted healthcare access despite their heightened healthcare needs. Factors such as stigma, mistrust of the healthcare system, competing priorities, and geographical barriers pose significant healthcare access challenges. Telehealth offers an innovative solution to expand healthcare access for better inclusion of underserved populations in healthcare. We aimed to explore PWUDs’ perceptions of telehealth as a healthcare delivery modality. Methods We utilized purposive sampling to recruit participants (N = 57) for nine focus group discussions (FGDs) in Athens, Greece. Eligibility criteria required participants to be at least 18 years, with current or prior injection drug use, and current internet access. The FGDs followed a semi-structured interview guide, were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and de-identified. We applied thematic analysis to analyze FGD transcripts. Results Participants’ mean (standard deviation) age was 47.9 (8.9) years, 89.5% (51/57) were male, 91.2% (52/57) were of Greek origin, and 61.4% (35/57) had attended at least 10 years of school. Three main themes emerged from the FGDs: (1) high internet utilization for healthcare-related purposes among PWUD, (2) highlighting telehealth benefits despite access obstacles and PWUDs’ concerns about diagnostic accuracy, and (3) approaches to overcome access obstacles and build digital trust. Participants extensively used the internet for healthcare-related processes, such as accessing healthcare information and scheduling provider appointments. Despite being telehealth-inexperienced, most participants expressed a strong willingness to embrace telehealth due to its perceived convenience, time-saving nature, and trusted digital environment. Some participants recognized that the inability to conduct physical examinations through telehealth reduces its diagnostic accuracy, while others expressed concerns about digital literacy and technological infrastructure accessibility. Most participants expressed a preference for video-based telehealth encounters over audio-only encounters. To build trust in telehealth and promote patient-centeredness, participants recommended an initial in-person visit, virtual eye contact during telehealth encounters, patient education, and partnerships with PWUD-supportive community organizations equipped with appropriate infrastructure. Conclusions PWUD frequently use the internet for health-related purposes and suggested several approaches to enhance virtual trust. Their insights and suggestions are practical guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance healthcare access for underserved populations through telehealth. Trial registration NCT05794984.

Abstract Background The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals identify universal access to sexual and reproductive health services as a global priority. Yet barriers to abortion access remain, including legal restrictions, cost, stigma, and limited services and information. The aim was to identify barriers to and facilitators of abortion care access experienced in Australia. Methods This qualitative phenomenological study examined abortion access in Australia, where abortion is decriminalised, from March 2020 to December 2022. We used social media and flyers in clinics to recruit adults who had sought abortion care, then interviewed them in-depth. We mapped participant experiences to five dimensions of access identified by Levesque et al.’s patient-centred access to healthcare framework: approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness. Results The 24 participants lived across Australia and sought abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approachability: Before seeking abortion, most did not know where to access information about the service and where to obtain it. Acceptability: Many were uncomfortable disclosing their abortion to family or friends; they reported that healthcare providers demonstrated varying levels of support. Availability and accommodation: Regional participants travelled far and faced long wait-times, exacerbated by pandemic restrictions. Affordability: Participants described financial stress paying for the service, travel, and related expenses. Appropriateness: Most participants expected judgemental care. Experiences varied widely: many participants experienced unempathetic, rushed, or judgemental interactions with healthcare staff, and many also reported at least one non-judgmental and supportive interaction on the same pathway to care. Discussion Abortion seekers experienced varying obstacles when seeking care. The findings illustrate the need for population- and system-level initiatives such as: providing accurate information about and normalising abortion; implementing system-level strategies to reduce wait times, travel, and costs, especially for rural populations; and developing regulatory and quality improvement initiatives to increase the workforce and its readiness to provide high-quality, non-judgemental abortion care. Challenges seeking care during pandemic restrictions illustrate the importance of social support during care and choice between abortion modalities and service types. Consumer voices can help understand the diverse pathways to abortion care and inform solutions to overcome the multidimensional barriers to access.

Abstract Background Phuket Province is a major tourist destination with a migrant workforce accounting for 10% of its population. Despite governmental efforts to adjust health insurance policies, migrants face healthcare access challenges. This study examines the current healthcare access situation and factors associated with unmet needs among migrants in Phuket Province. Methods We used a cross-sectional mixed-methods approach, recruiting participants through snowball sampling from the Migrant Health Volunteer Network. Quantitative data were gathered using self-administered questionnaires, with unmet need defined as desired outpatient or recommended inpatient services not received at government hospitals. Multivariable logistic regression identified unmet need predictors, and we assessed the mediating effect of health insurance status. Qualitative data from three focus groups on healthcare access provided context and enriched the quantitative findings. Results This study includes 296 migrants mainly from Myanmar. The overall unmet need prevalence was 14.86%, mainly attributed to having undocumented status (34.09%), affordability issues (20.45%), and language barriers (18.18%). Working in the fishery industry significantly increased unmet needs risk (aOR 2.68, 95% CI 1.08–6.62). Undocumented status contributed a marginal total effect of 4.86 (95% CI 1.62–14.54), with a natural indirect effect through uninsured status of only 1.16 (95% CI 0.88–1.52). Focus group participants used various medical resources, with insured individuals preferring hospital care, but faced obstacles due to undocumented status and language barriers. Conclusion Valid legal documents, including work permits and visas, are crucial for healthcare access. Attention to fishery industry practices is needed. We recommend stakeholder discussions to streamline the process of obtaining and maintaining these documents for migrant workers. These improvements could enhance health insurance acquisition and ultimately improve healthcare affordability for this population. These insights could be applied to migrant workers in other urban and suburban area of Thailand regarding access to government healthcare facilities.

Although exclusionary immigration policies are associated with fear of deportation and avoidance of public benefits, relationships between immigration enforcement policy and public charge policies are largely unknown. Using a California population-based survey of 1103 Asian and Latinx immigrants in 2018, we tested the relationship between immigrants experiences with law enforcement and their concern about public charge. Direct encounters with various forms of law enforcement, including being asked to show proof of citizenship by law enforcement, staying inside to avoid police or immigration officials, and having known someone who had been deported, were associated with immigrants avoidance of public benefits due to public charge concerns. Latinx immigrants were more likely to be concerns about public charge than Asians. Intersections among immigration policies deserve further consideration. There is a need to provide accurate and reliable information to immigrant communities about public benefits and advocate for inclusive immigration policies.