Search

The COVID-19 pandemic created a challenge for providing assistive technology (AT) and rehabilitation services, with many service providers implementing telehealth service provision for the first time. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of people accessing and providing AT and rehabilitation services during the pandemic and to assess the implementation of telehealth service delivery at an assistive technology and rehabilitation center in India. A mixed-methods design, combining analysis of clinical data and semi-structured interviews, was utilized. A descriptive analysis of demographics and clinical characteristics of service users accessing services through telehealth, or in-person mode was completed. In addition, service users were interviewed to explore their experiences of accessing services during the pandemic. Service providers were also interviewed to gather their opinions on telehealth service delivery during the pandemic. Findings showed that telehealth was an alternative tool in the pandemic for continuing to deliver services in a low-resource setting. However, not all types of services could be successfully delivered via telehealth. There are barriers to the delivery of telehealth services that need to be considered and addressed to allow successful implementation, and it is important to consider that telehealth consultations are not suitable for all service users.

Purpose\ud To validate a new classification system for bespoke thermoplastic ankle foot orthoses (AFOs).\ud \ud Methods\ud Inter- and intra-observer reliability study. A classification system based on the design and function of AFOs was created. Sixty-three independent observers classified thirty-six photographs of different AFOs, according to the proposed classification system via an online questionnaire. Approximately two weeks later, the same AFOs were classified again by fifty-three of the same participants. All participants were health care professionals, researchers, or technicians with experience in referring for, prescribing, fitting, reviewing, researching or manufacturing AFOs.\ud \ud Results\ud The mean inter- and intra-observer agreement Fleiss’ kappa was 0.932 and 0.944, respectively. 98.3% of participants reported that the classification system was very easy or moderately easy to use, with 85.7% reporting they would use the classification system. 90.5% of participants reported that the proposed AFO classification system was clear, with 84% stating it was useful.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud The proposed classification system for bespoke thermoplastic AFOs, has an excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement. It will reduce the ambiguity of the description of the type of AFOs used in clinical practice and research. Furthermore, it makes reproducible comparisons between groups possible, which are essential for future evaluations of evidence-based orthotic care.

Additional file 1.

ICCHP-AAATE 2022 Open Access Compendium "Assistive Technology, Accessibility and (e)Inclusion" Part II / Petz, Andrea ; Hoogerwerf, Evert-Jan ; Mavrou, Katerina, Seite 86-94, This study presents the findings from the WHO UK rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) questionnaire completed in 2021; using the digital rATA questionnaire with a total of 259 questionnaires completed. 62.9% of respondents used assistive products and the top three selected assistive products were spectacles, hearing aids and grab-bars handrails. 18.5% of respondents had an unmet need for assistive products. Most assistive products were sourced from the private sector. The majority were paid out-of-pocket and approximately one fifth were supplied through government sources. For adults most assistive products were paid out-of-pocket, while for children most were paid for by the government. Most respondents were very satisfied with their assistive products, AT services and with repair, maintenance, and follow-up. ‘Cannot afford’ and ‘Lack of support’ were the most frequently identified barriers to accessing assistive products and many reported that the Covid-19 pandemic was a significant barrier to access. The collected data provides useful information on the use of assistive products in the UK. The collected data dispels the myth that assistive products are only for people with a disability. A large-scale questionnaire at national level would be of significant benefit in raising population awareness in the UK.

Additional file 1. Survey questions.

ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a shift to remote consultations, but telehealth consultation guidelines are lacking or inconsistent. Therefore, a scoping review was performed to chart the information in the articles exploring telehealth for the UK allied health professionals (AHPs) and compare them with the UK AHP professional bodies’ guidelines.DesignScoping review following Aksey and O’ Malley methodological framework.Data sourcesCINHAL and MEDLINE were searched from inception to March 2021 using terms related to ‘telehealth’, ‘guidelines’ and ‘AHPs’. Additionally, the UK AHP professional bodies were contacted requesting their guidelines.Study selectionArticles exploring telehealth for patient consultations, written in English and published in peer-reviewed journal or guidelines available from UK AHP professional bodies/their websites were considered eligible for review.Data extractionOne reviewer extracted data concerning three overarching domains: implementation, financial and technological considerations.Results2632 articles were identified through database searches with 21 articles eligible for review. Eight guidelines were obtained from the UK AHP professional bodies with a total of 29 included articles/guidelines. Most articles were published in the last two years; there was variety in telehealth terminology, and most were developed for occupational therapists, physiotherapists and speech and language therapists. Information was lacking about the assessment of telehealth use and effectiveness, barriers and limitations, the logistical management, the family’s and caregiver’s roles and the costs. There was lack of clarity on the AHPs’ registration requirements, costs and coverage, and legal aspects.ConclusionThis study identified gaps in current guidelines, which showed similarities as well as discrepancies with the guidance for non-AHP healthcare professionals and revealed that the existing guidelines do not adequately support AHPs delivering telehealth consultations. Future research and collaborative work across AHP groups and the world’s leading health institutions are suggested to establish common guidelines that will improve AHP telehealth services.