Search

ObjectivesThis analysis characterized changes in weight in participants with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or narcolepsy treated with solriamfetol (Sunosi™) 37.5 (OSA only), 75, 150, or 300 mg/d.MethodsIn two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and one 1-year open-label extension study, changes in weight were evaluated from baseline to end of study (week 12 or week 40 of the open-label extension [after up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment]) in participants with OSA or narcolepsy.ResultsAfter 12 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, median percent change in weight from baseline across all solriamfetol doses was -0.84%, compared with 0.54% for placebo, in participants with OSA; and -0.07%, compared with 3.08% for placebo, in participants with narcolepsy. After up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, overall median percent change in weight from baseline was -1.76%, which showed a dose-dependent pattern (75 mg, 0.57%; 150 mg, -1.2%; 300 mg, -2.5%). Results were similar in subgroups of participants with OSA or narcolepsy, with overall median percent changes in weight of -2.2% and -1.1%, respectively. After up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, the percentage of participants with weight loss ≥5% relative to baseline was 25.7% overall and increased in a dose-dependent manner (75 mg, 4.5%; 150 mg, 17.3%; 300 mg, 32.4%). Results were similar among subgroups of participants with OSA or narcolepsy, with 26.4% and 24.2% of participants experiencing weight loss ≥5%, respectively. No weight-related treatment-emergent adverse events were serious.ConclusionsSolriamfetol treatment was associated with decreases in body weight in a dose-related manner.

Study objectivesSolriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved in the United States and European Union for excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; 37.5-150 mg/day). In 12-week studies, solriamfetol was associated with improvements in quality of life in participants with narcolepsy or OSA. These analyses evaluated the long-term effects of solriamfetol on quality of life.MethodsParticipants with narcolepsy or OSA who completed previous solriamfetol studies were eligible. A 2-week titration was followed by a maintenance phase ≤ 50 weeks (stable doses: 75, 150, or 300 mg/day). Quality of life assessments included Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire short version, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2. Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline to end of study were evaluated. Data were summarized descriptively. Adverse events were assessed.ResultsSafety population comprised 643 participants (417 OSA, 226 narcolepsy). Solriamfetol improved Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire short version Total scores (mean change [standard deviation], 3.7 [3.0]) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 Physical and Mental Component Summary scores (3.1 [6.9] and 4.3 [8.4], respectively); improvements were sustained throughout treatment. On Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem, solriamfetol reduced (improved) % presenteeism, % overall work impairment, and % activity impairment by a minimum of 25%. Common adverse events (≥ 5%): headache, nausea, nasopharyngitis, insomnia, dry mouth, anxiety, decreased appetite, and upper respiratory tract infection.ConclusionsLong-term solriamfetol treatment was associated with clinically meaningful, sustained improvements in functional status, work productivity, and quality of life for up to 52 weeks. Adverse events were similar between narcolepsy and OSA.Clinical trial registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A Long-Term Safety Study of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Subjects with Narcolepsy or OSA; Identifier: NCT02348632; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348632.CitationWeaver TE, Pepin J-L, Schwab R, et al. Long-term effects of solriamfetol on quality of life and work productivity in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(10):1995-2007.

Study objectivesTo evaluate long-term safety and maintenance of efficacy of solriamfetol treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).MethodsParticipants with narcolepsy or OSA who completed a prior solriamfetol study were eligible. A 2-week titration period was followed by a maintenance phase (up to 50 weeks). Efficacy was assessed by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGI-C and CGI-C, respectively). After approximately 6 months of treatment, a subgroup entered a 2-week placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal (RW) phase. Change in ESS from beginning to end of the RW phase was the primary endpoint; PGI-C and CGI-C were secondary endpoints. Safety was assessed throughout the study.ResultsIn the maintenance phase, solriamfetol-treated participants demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements on ESS, PGI-C, and CGI-C. In the RW phase, least squares mean change on ESS was 1.6 in participants continuing solriamfetol versus 5.3 in participants switched to placebo (p < .0001). For both secondary endpoints, higher percentages of participants receiving placebo were reported as worse at the end of the RW phase versus solriamfetol (p < .0001). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with solriamfetol were headache, nausea, nasopharyngitis, insomnia, dry mouth, anxiety, decreased appetite, and upper respiratory tract infection; 27 (4.2%) participants experienced at least one serious TEAE, and 61 (9.5%) withdrew because of TEAEs.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated long-term maintenance of efficacy of solriamfetol under open-label and double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions. Safety profile of solriamfetol was consistent with previous 12-week studies; no new safety concerns were identified.Trial registrationNCT02348632.

Aims: We analysed longitudinal blood pressure (BP) data from hypertensive obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients in the European Sleep Apnea Database cohort. The study investigated the interaction between positive airway pressure (PAP)-induced BP change and antihypertensive treatment (AHT). Methods and results: Hypertensive patients with AHT [monotherapy/dual therapy n = 1283/652, mean age 59.6 ± 10.7/60.6 ± 10.3 years, body mass index (BMI) 34.2 ± 6.5/34.8 ± 7.0 kg/m2, apnoea–hypopnoea index 46 ± 25/46 ± 24 n/h, proportion female 29/26%, respectively] started PAP treatment. Office BP at baseline and 2- to 36-month follow-up were assessed. The interaction between AHT drug classes and PAP on BP was quantified and the influences of age, gender, BMI, co-morbidities, BP at baseline, and study site were evaluated. Following PAP treatment (daily usage, 5.6 ± 1.6/5.7 ± 1.9 h/day), systolic BP was reduced by −3.9 ± 15.5/−2.8 ± 17.7 mmHg in mono/dual AHT and diastolic BP by −3.0 ± 9.8/−2.7 ± 10.8 mmHg, respectively, all P < 0.0001. Systolic and diastolic BP control was improved following PAP treatment (38/35% to 54/46% and 67/67% to 79/74%, mono/dual AHT, respectively). PAP treatment duration predicted a larger BP improvement in the monotherapy group. Intake of renin–angiotensin blockers [angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)] alone or in any AHT combination was associated with better BP control. The AHT-dependent BP improvement was independent of confounders. Conclusion: In this pan-European OSA patient cohort, BP control improved following initiation of PAP. Longer PAP treatment duration, was associated with a favourable effect on BP. Our study suggests that ACEI/ARB, alone or in combination with other drug classes, provides a particularly strong reduction of BP and better BP control when combined with PAP in OSA. Graphical Abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Telemedicine has been introduced for improved PAP follow-up. Objectives: Our study aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of and patient satisfaction with PAP follow-up with an early intervention telemedical protocol. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at four sleep clinics of the same county. Treatment-naive patients with obstructive sleep apnea were randomized to standard PAP follow-up (203 patients, fixed follow-up procedures) or early intervention telemedical follow-up (AirView, ResMed; 206 patients, continuous follow-up) for 3 months. Evaluated variables included PAP adherence at 3 months, patient-reported outcome measures (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, 36-item Short Form Health Survey, Insomnia Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and staff time. Group differences were analyzed with linear mixed regression models adjusted for age, body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index, and study center. Results: The study groups were comparable at baseline (N= 409; mean age, 59612 yr; body mass index, 31.966 kg/m², apnea-hypopnea index, 41.5621 events/h). PAP adherence was higher in the proactive telemedicine group than in the control group (4.362.4 and 4.162.6 h/night; P = 0.01, respectively), and mean mask pressure at follow-up was significantly lower in the telemedicine group than in the control group (8.762.1 cm H2O vs. 9.262.5 cm H2O; P = 0.028). In post hoc analysis, the difference in PAP adherence between groups was most pronounced in patients with depression (4.862.6 h/night vs. 2.762.3 h/night; P = 0.03). Relevant mask leakage (.24 L/min) was lower in the telemedicine group (5.4% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.024). Improvement of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction was equivalent between groups. Conclusions: Proactive telemedical management of the initial follow-up of PAP treatment compared favorably with conventional follow-up in terms of adherence, pressure level, and mask leakage. Patients with depression may particularly benefit from telemedical follow-up. Specific clinical routines are required to establish this practice in sleep clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: We recruited 5,970 hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on current antihypertensive treatment from the European Sleep Apnea Database (ESADA) cohort. The group was subdivided into those receiving monotherapy (n = 3,594) and those receiving dual combined therapy (n = 2,376). We studied how major OSA confounders like age, gender, and body mass index as well as the degree of sleep apnea modified office systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Beta‐blockers alone or in combination with a diuretic were compared with other antihypertensive drug classes. Monotherapy with beta‐blocker was associated with lower systolic blood pressure, particularly in non‐obese middle‐aged males with hypertension. Conversely, the combination of a beta‐blocker and a diuretic was associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients with moderate–severe OSA. Systolic blood pressure was better controlled in female patients using this combined treatment. Our cross‐sectional data suggest that specific clinical characteristics and type of antihypertensive medication influence the degree of blood pressure control in hypertensive OSA patients. Controlled trials are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]