1. Unsupervised Gait Event Identification with a Single Wearable Accelerometer and/or Gyroscope: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns.
- Author
-
Kiernan, Dovin, Dunn Siino, Kristine, and Hawkins, David A
- Subjects
Sacrum ,Humans ,Gait ,Running ,Accelerometry ,Biomechanical Phenomena ,Wearable Electronic Devices ,heel strike ,in-field sport and athlete monitoring ,inertial measurement units ,initial contact ,stance ,step ,swing ,toe off ,Clinical Research ,Analytical Chemistry ,Environmental Science and Management ,Ecology ,Distributed Computing ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Abstract
We evaluated 18 methods capable of identifying initial contact (IC) and terminal contact (TC) gait events during human running using data from a single wearable sensor on the shank or sacrum. We adapted or created code to automatically execute each method, then applied it to identify gait events from 74 runners across different foot strike angles, surfaces, and speeds. To quantify error, estimated gait events were compared to ground truth events from a time-synchronized force plate. Based on our findings, to identify gait events with a wearable on the shank, we recommend the Purcell or Fadillioglu method for IC (biases +17.4 and -24.3 ms; LOAs -96.8 to +131.6 and -137.0 to +88.4 ms) and the Purcell method for TC (bias +3.5 ms; LOAs -143.9 to +150.9 ms). To identify gait events with a wearable on the sacrum, we recommend the Auvinet or Reenalda method for IC (biases -30.4 and +29.0 ms; LOAs -149.2 to +88.5 and -83.3 to +141.3 ms) and the Auvinet method for TC (bias -2.8 ms; LOAs -152.7 to +147.2 ms). Finally, to identify the foot in contact with the ground when using a wearable on the sacrum, we recommend the Lee method (81.9% accuracy).
- Published
- 2023