Search

The extent of lung involvement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, quantified on computed tomography (CT), is an established biomarker for prognosis and guides clinical decision-making. The clinical standard is semi-quantitative scoring of lung involvement by an experienced reader. We aim to compare the performance of automated deep-learning- and threshold-based methods to the manual semi-quantitative lung scoring. Further, we aim to investigate an optimal threshold for quantification of involved lung in COVID pneumonia chest CT, using a multi-center dataset.In total 250 patients were included, 50 consecutive patients with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 from our local institutional database, and another 200 patients from four international datasets (n=50 each). Lung involvement was scored semi-quantitatively by three experienced radiologists according to the established chest CT score (CCS) ranging from 0-25. Inter-rater reliability was reported by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Deep-learning-based segmentation of ground-glass and consolidation was obtained by CT Pulmo Auto Results prototype plugin on IntelliSpace Discovery (Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands). Threshold-based segmentation of involved lung was implemented using an open-source tool for whole-lung segmentation under the presence of severe pathologies (R231CovidWeb, HofmanningerMedian CCS among 250 evaluated patients was 10 [6-15]. Inter-rater reliability of the CCS was excellent [ICC 0.97 (0.97-0.98)]. Best attenuation threshold for identification of involved lung was -522 HU. While the relationship of deep-learning- and threshold-based quantification was linear and strong (rThe manual semi-quantitative CCS underestimates the extent of COVID pneumonia in higher score ranges, which limits its clinical usefulness in cases of severe disease. Clinical implementation of fully automated methods, such as deep-learning or threshold-based approaches (best threshold in our multi-center dataset: -522 HU), might save time of trained personnel, abolish inter-reader variability, and allow for truly quantitative, linear assessment of COVID lung involvement.

Purpose To develop a deep-learning (DL)-based approach for thoracic lymph node (LN) mapping based on their anatomical location. Method The training-and validation-dataset included 89 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest. 4201 LNs were semi-automatically segmented and then assigned to LN levels according to their anatomical location. The LN level classification task was addressed by a multi-class segmentation procedure using a fully convolutional neural network. Mapping was performed by firstly determining potential level affiliation for each voxel and then performing majority voting over all voxels belonging to each LN. Mean classification accuracies on the validation data were calculated separately for each level and overall Top-1, Top-2 and Top-3 scores were determined, where a Top-X score describes how often the annotated class was within the top-X predictions. To demonstrate the clinical applicability of our model, we tested its N-staging capabilities in a simulated clinical use case scenario assuming a patient diseased with lung cancer. Results The artificial intelligence(AI)-based assignment revealed mean classification accuracies of 86.36 % (Top-1), 94.48 % (Top-2) and 96.10 % (Top-3). Best accuracies were achieved for LNs in the subcarinal level 7 (98.31 %) and axillary region (98.74 %). The highest misclassification rates were observed among LNs in adjacent levels. The proof-of-principle application in a simulated clinical use case scenario for automated tumor N-staging showed a mean classification accuracy of up to 96.14 % (Top-1). Conclusions The proposed AI approach for automatic classification of LN levels in chest CT as well as the proof-of-principle-experiment for automatic N-staging, revealed promising results, warranting large-scale validation for clinical application.

The identification and segmentation of target objects from medical images is often confused by other more salient objects in the image. This is a specific problem for X-ray projection images where the shadows of semi-transparent objects are overlaid. A bone shadow may confuse the automated detection of other crossing bones and of important soft tissue findings in the lung like lung nodules. We present a method to identify and remove such bone shadows from a chest radiograph for the purpose of suppressing all bone shadows overlapping with the lung field in a standard posterior-anterior view. In this context an elegant novel approach to the problem of identifying and segmenting overlaid objects is followed: Disturbing objects are identified first and literally removed from the image, therefore no longer confusing the detection of other more subtle objects. This method allowed the identification, segmentation, and suppression of the clavicles, the posterior and the anterior parts of the ribs — one after another. In a clinical study the detection of lung nodules by experienced radiologists was improved after bone suppression.

Suppressing thoracic bone shadows in chest radiographs has been previously reported to improve the detection rates for solid lung nodules, however at the cost of increased false detection rates. These bone suppression methods are based on an artificial neural network that was trained using dual-energy subtraction images in order to mimic their appearance. Here, a novel approach is followed where all bone shadows crossing the lung field are suppressed sequentially leaving the intercostal space unaffected. Given a contour delineating a bone, its image region is spatially transferred to separate normal image gradient components from tangential component. Smoothing the normal partial gradient along the contour results in a reconstruction of the image representing the bone shadow only, because all other overlaid signals tend to cancel out each other in this representation. The method works even with highly contrasted overlaid objects such as a pacemaker. The approach was validated in a reader study with two experienced chest radiologists, and these images helped improving both the sensitivity and the specificity of the readers for the detection and localization of solid lung nodules. The AUC improved significantly from 0.596 to 0.655 on a basis of 146 images from patients and normals with a total of 123 confirmed lung nodules. Subtracting all reconstructed bone shadows from the original image results in a soft image where lung nodules are no longer obscured by bone shadows. Both the sensitivity and the specificity of experienced radiologists increased.