3 results on '"Helen Johnson-Wall"'
Search Results
2. Lung cancer: Improving screening in rural clinic
- Author
-
Thuy Thanh Thi Le, Katherine Hu, and Helen Johnson-wall
- Subjects
Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Cancer ,Disease ,business ,medicine.disease ,Lung cancer - Abstract
e13060 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of overall cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States. In 2009, cancer surpassed cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death in North Carolina. Between 2010-2014, the age-adjusted incidence rate for lung and bronchus cancers in North Carolina was 70 per 100000 persons per year. Between 2010-2014, the age-adjusted mortality rate for lung and bronchus cancers in North Carolina was 50.6 per 100000 persons per year. It is documented that about half of lung and bronchus cancer cases were diagnosed at the distant stage and about 60 percent of deaths occurred in adults ages 65-84. In 2011, 32 percent of cancer death was from lung/bronchus cancer in Robeson County. A chart review in a rural primary care clinic identified patients not being appropriately screened for targeted intervention. Methods: Our retrospective chart review at Lumberton Medical Clinic, a rural outpatient Internal Medicine Clinic, reviewed 91 records from adults aged 55 to 80 years old during the timeframe of September 2017 through August 2018. Patients with a known history of lung cancer were excluded from this study. Patient records were assessed for compliance with USPTF lung cancer screening guidelines. USPTF recommends adults aged 55 to 80 who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years to have an annual low-dose computed tomography of the chest to screen for lung cancer. Results: The review showed that during the timeframe studied, 42% of patients who qualified received appropriate screening, while 58% of those qualified were found to have no documentation of screening. Following data analysis, intervention to increase screening rates has been initiated. This involves provider education, posters, and individualized letters mailed to patients found deficient during the study. The success of this direct patient outreach effort will be measured over six months. Conclusions: It is the responsibility of providers to emphasize the importance of proper lung cancer screening. This retrospective review found that a large percentage (58%) of adults were not being adequately screened in our rural clinic. Direct outreach is underway to increase compliance rates in this high-risk population served by our rural clinic.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Colorectal cancer: Improving screening in a rural clinic
- Author
-
Thuy Thanh Thi Le and Helen Johnson-wall
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Oncology - Abstract
e13054 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Between 2012-2016, the age adjusted mortality rate was 18-25 per 100,000 persons in Robeson County, North Carolina. During this timeframe, it is estimated that if all people aged 50 and older in NC were routinely screened, 40 out of 100 deaths from late stage CRC can be prevented. A chart review in a rural primary care clinic identified patients not being appropriately screened for targeted intervention. Methods: Our retrospective chart review at Lumberton Medical Clinic, a rural outpatient Internal Medicine Clinic, reviewed 1622 records from adults 50-75 years old during the timeframe September 2017 through August 2018. Patients with history of CRC or status-post colectomy for other reasons were excluded from this study. Patient records were assessed for compliance with USPTF CRC screening guidelines. USPTF recommends adults aged 50 to 75 years receive screening as follows: 1) Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) annually 2) Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years 3) Colonoscopy every 10 years OR 4) Combined FOBT (every 3 years) plus flexible sigmoidoscopy (every 5 years). Results: The review showed that during the timeframe studied, 56% of patients received appropriate screening, 44% were found with no documentation of screening, and 17% were never offered screening or informed about current guidelines. Following data analysis, intervention to increase screening rates has been initiated. This involves provider education, posters in clinic, and individualized letters mailed to patients found deficient during the study. The success of this direct patient outreach effort will be measured over six months. Conclusions: The mortality rate from CRC cancer is higher in Robeson County compared to the NC state rate. Additionally, 40% of deaths from late-stage CRC may be prevented by doing a routine screening. It is the responsibility of providers to emphasize the importance of proper screening. This retrospective review found that a large percentage (44%) of adults are not being adequately screened in our rural clinic. Direct outreach is underway to increase compliance rates in this high-risk population served by our rural clinic.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.