Search

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Liver inflammation is associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and other pathologies, but noninvasive methods to assess liver inflammation are limited. Inflammation causes endothelial disruption and leakage of plasma proteins into the interstitial space and can result in extravascular coagulation with fibrin deposition. Here we assess the feasibility of using the established fibrin-specific magnetic resonance probe EP-2104R for the noninvasive imaging of fibrin as a marker of liver inflammation. METHODS Weekly 100 mg/kg diethylnitrosamine (DEN) dosing was used to generate liver fibrosis in male rats; control animals received vehicle. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T with EP-2104R, a matched non-fibrin-binding control linear peptide, or the collagen-specific probe EP-3533 was performed at 1 day or 7 days after the last DEN administration. Imaging data were compared with quantitative histological measures of fibrosis and inflammation. RESULTS After 4 or 5 DEN administrations, the liver becomes moderately fibrotic, and fibrosis is the same if the animal is killed 1 day (Ishak score, 3.62 ± 0.31) or 7 days (Ishak score, 3.82 ± 0.25) after the last DEN dose, but inflammation is significantly higher at 1 day compared with 7 days after the last DEN dose (histological activity index from 0-4, 3.54 ± 0.14 vs 1.61 ± 0.16, respectively; P < 0.0001). Peak EP-2104R signal enhancement was significantly higher in animals imaged at 1 day post-DEN compared with 7 days post-DEN or control rats (29.0% ± 3.2% vs 22.4% ± 2.0% vs 17.0% ± 0.2%, respectively; P = 0.017). Signal enhancement with EP-2104R was significantly higher than control linear peptide at 1 day post-DEN but not at 7 days post-DEN indicating specific fibrin binding during the inflammatory phase. Collagen molecular magnetic resonance with EP-3533 showed equivalent T1 change when imaging rats 1 day or 7 days post-DEN, consistent with equivalent fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS EP-2104R can specifically detect fibrin associated with inflammation in a rat model of liver inflammation and fibrosis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of multifrequency MR elastography for grading necro-inflammation in the liver. Fifty participants with chronic hepatitis B or C were recruited for this institutional review board-approved study. Their liver was examined with multifrequency MR elastography. The storage, shear and loss moduli, and the damping ratio were measured at 56 Hz. The multifrequency wave dispersion coefficient of the shear modulus was calculated. The measurements were compared to reference markers of necro-inflammation and fibrosis with Spearman correlations and multiple regression analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed. At multiple regression analysis, necro-inflammation was the only determinant of the multifrequency dispersion coefficient, whereas fibrosis was the only determinant of the storage, loss and shear moduli. The multifrequency dispersion coefficient had the largest AUC for necro-inflammatory activity A ≥ 2 [0.84 (0.71–0.93) vs. storage modulus AUC: 0.65 (0.50–0.79), p = 0.03], whereas the storage modulus had the largest AUC for fibrosis F ≥ 2 [AUC (95% confidence intervals) 0.91 (0.79–0.98)] and cirrhosis F4 [0.97 (0.88–1.00)]. The measurement of the multifrequency dispersion coefficient at three-dimensional MR elastography has the potential to grade liver necro-inflammation in patients with chronic vial hepatitis.

Purpose To determine the relationship of liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis with the magnetic resonance (MR) viscoelastic and diffusion parameters in patients with chronic liver disease and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging parameters in staging liver fibrosis. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with chronic liver disease scheduled for liver biopsy were prospectively recruited from November 2010 to October 2012 for this institutional review board-approved study after they provided written informed consent. Sixty-eight patients underwent three-dimensional MR elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a 1.5-T MR system. Fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis were assessed with the METAVIR and steatosis, activity, and fibrosis (or SAF) scoring systems. Spearman correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between liver fibrosis, inflammation, steatosis, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and viscoelastic and diffusion parameters. The accuracy of three-dimensional MR elastography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the determination of fibrosis stage was assessed with Obuchowski measures. Results At multiple regression analysis, fibrosis was the only variable associated with viscoelastic parameters (β = 0.6, P < .001, R2 = 0.33 for shear modulus; β = 0.6, P < .001, R2 = 0.32 for elasticity). Fibrosis had a weaker independent association with the apparent diffusion coefficient (β = -0.3, P = .02, R2 = 0.33) than did steatosis (β = -0.5, P < .001, R2 = 0.33). Steatosis was the only factor independently associated with the pure diffusion coefficient (β = -0.4, P = .002, R2 = 0.22). Inflammation and ALT level were not associated with the viscoelastic or diffusion parameters. The diagnostic accuracy of fibrosis staging was significantly higher when measuring the shear modulus rather than the apparent diffusion coefficient (Obuchowski measures, 0.82 ± 0.04 vs 0.30 ± 0.06; P < .001). Conclusion Fibrosis is independently associated with the MR viscoelastic parameters and is less associated with the diffusion parameters than is steatosis. These results and those of diagnostic accuracy suggest that MR elastography should be preferred over diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the staging of liver fibrosis. © RSNA, 2016.

Background Steatosis assessed by histology is commonly considered to be a significant risk factor for liver surgery. MRI is considered as the new gold standard for noninvasive liver fat quantification. The purpose was to assess whether liver steatosis determined by preoperative MRI is an independent risk factor of complications after major liver resection. Methods All patients who underwent liver MRI before major liver resection in our institution between January 2001 and December 2011 were included in this retrospective study. The liver fat fraction (LFF) was assessed on in- and opposed-phase T1-weighted dual echo gradient echo MRI and steatosis was defined as a MRI LFF of ≥5%. The association between steatosis and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification, ascites >500 mL at day 5, 50-50 criteria, fistula/collection, blood liver test alterations, pulmonary complications, nonpulmonary complications, >1 complication, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, duration of hospital stay, and death) was assessed by multivariate analysis using the appropriate model. Results A MRI LFF of ≥5% was associated with severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ IIIa; P = .04), more pulmonary complications (P = .02), and longer duration of hospital stay (P = .02) on the multivariate model adjusted for confounding factors. The postoperative aminotransferase levels were higher in patients with a MRI LFF of ≥5%, than in other patients (P = .0008). Conclusion Liver steatosis assessed by routine preoperative MRI is shown to be an independent risk factor of severe postoperative complications after major liver resection.

The objective of this study was to compare the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) determined with 3 b values and the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters in the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.Seventy-six patients with 86 solid hepatic lesions, including 8 hemangiomas, 20 lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia, 9 adenomas, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas, 13 metastases, and 6 cholangiocarcinomas, were assessed in this prospective study. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 11 b values to measure the ADCs (with b = 0, 150, and 500 s/mm) and the IVIM-derived parameters, namely, the pure diffusion coefficient and the perfusion-related diffusion fraction and coefficient. The diffusion parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors and between tumor types, and their diagnostic value in identifying tumor malignancy was assessed.The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients were significantly higher in benign than in malignant tumors (benign: 2.32 [0.87] × 10 mm/s and 1.42 [0.37] × 10 mm/s vs malignant: 1.64 [0.51] × 10 mm/s and 1.14 [0.28] × 10 mm/s, respectively; P0.0001 and P = 0.0005), whereas the perfusion-related diffusion parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients provided similar accuracy in assessing tumor malignancy (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.770 and 0.723, respectively). In the multigroup analysis, the ADC was found to be significantly higher in hemangiomas than in hepatocellular carcinomas, metastases, and cholangiocarcinomas. In the same manner, it was higher in lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia than in metastases and cholangiocarcinomas. However, the pure diffusion coefficient was significantly higher only in hemangiomas versus hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas.Compared with the ADC, the diffusion parameters derived from the IVIM model did not improve the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.

Assess the effect of fat deposition on the MRI diffusion coefficients in lipid emulsion-based phantoms and patients with proven isolated liver steatosis.Diffusion-weighted MRI with 11 b values from 0-500 s/mm(2) was performed in phantoms (fat fractions 0-18 %) with and without fat suppression and in 19 patients with normal liver (n = 14) or isolated liver steatosis (n = 5) proven by histopathology. The apparent, pure and perfusion-related diffusion coefficients and the perfusion fraction were measured. Spearman correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparisons.A strong correlation between the apparent and pure diffusion coefficients and fat fractions was seen in phantoms. The pure diffusion coefficient decreased significantly in patients with liver steatosis (0.96 ± 0.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.18 ± 0.09 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in normal liver, P = 0.005), whereas the decrease in apparent diffusion coefficient did not reach statistical significance (1.26 ± 0.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.41 ± 0.14 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in normal liver, P = 0.298).Fat deposition decreases the apparent and pure diffusion coefficients in lipid emulsion-based phantoms and patients with isolated liver steatosis proven by histopathology.

To assess the performance, postprocessing time, and intra- and interobserver agreement of a simple magnetic resonance-based mapping technique to quantify liver fat.This prospective, single-center study included 26 patients who were overweight with type 2 diabetes and at risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Mapping of the liver was based on a triple echo gradient-echo sequence, and (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used as the reference standard. The nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon test were used for comparisons between mapping and spectroscopy. The mapping was assessed for its predictive performance using the area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic curve. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to calculate intra- and interobserver's agreement for mapping measurements.Patients had a mean fat percentage of 11.7% (range, 2-35.4%). A strong correlation was seen between mapping and spectroscopy (r = 0.89, P.0001). A cutoff of 6.9% for fat fraction mapping was found to diagnose steatosis with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity with an area under the curve of 0.99. Mapping of the liver had shorter acquisition and post-processing times than spectroscopy (5 min vs. 38 min; P.0001). Mapping measurements had an intra- and interobserver agreement of 0.98 and 0.99, respectively.The magnetic resonance-based liver mapping can accurately quantify liver fat with a cutoff value of 6.9% and excellent intra- and interobserver agreement. This mapping technique, with its simple methodology and short postprocessing time, has the potential to be included in routine abdominal protocols.

To determine if diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with measurements of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient, perfusion-related diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction can be used to differentiate between viable tumor and fibrous and necrotic regions within malignant liver tumors.The prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-eight patients with 51 malignant tumors were assessed. MR images of the liver were obtained by using DW imaging with 11 b factors (0-500 sec/mm(2)) and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging. Tumors were segmented into viable tumor and fibrous and necrotic regions according to the enhancement pattern after injection of a nonspecific gadolinium chelate and, in surgically removed lesions, results of histopathologic correlation. The ADC, pure diffusion coefficient, perfusion-related diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were calculated, and values were compared between viable tumor and fibrous and necrotic regions with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test.The pure diffusion coefficient differed significantly between regions of viable tumor tissue and fibrosis (1.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.29 and 1.48 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.31, respectively; P = .016) and between regions of viable tumor tissue and necrosis (1.70 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec ± 0.49, P = .002). There was a significantly lower perfusion fraction in necrotic regions (14% ± 6) than in viable tumor regions (21% ± 8, P = .005), but the perfusion fraction of the fibrous regions (21% ± 7) did not differ significantly from that of the other two regions. ADCs and perfusion-related diffusion coefficients did not differ significantly among the three regions.Results of this study show that viable tumor regions in malignant liver tumors can be differentiated from fibrous and necrotic regions with use of the pure diffusion coefficient but not with the other diffusion parameters.

To assess the value of the viscoelastic parameters in the characterisation of liver tumours at MR elastography.Ninety-four patients with liver tumours1 cm prospectively underwent MR elastography using 50-Hz mechanical waves and a full three-directional motion-sensitive sequence. The model-free viscoelastic parameters (the complex shear modulus and its real and imaginary parts, i.e. the storage and loss moduli) were calculated in 72 lesions after exclusion of cystic, treated or histopathologically undetermined tumours.We observed higher absolute shear modulus and loss modulus in malignant versus benign tumours (3.38 ± 0.26 versus 2.41 ± 0.15 kPa, P 0.01 and 2.25 ± 0.26 versus 1.05 ± 0.13 kPa, P 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the loss modulus of hepatocellular carcinomas was significantly higher than in benign hepatocellular tumours. The storage modulus did not differ significantly between malignant and benign tumours. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of loss modulus was significantly larger than that of the absolute shear modulus and storage modulus when comparing malignant and benign lesions.The increased loss modulus is a better discriminator between benign and malignant tumours than the increased storage modulus or absolute value of the shear modulus.• Magnetic Resonance elastography is a new method of assessing the liver. • Increased loss modulus is an indicator of malignancy in hepatic tumours. • Loss modulus is a better discriminator than absolute shear modulus values. • The viscoelastic properties of lesions offer promise for characterising liver tumours.