Search

PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.

Background: Primary objective of this present trial was to define the maximum tolerable dose of lapatinib in combination with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid (OFF) in refractory pancreatic cancer. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of lapatinib plus OFF. Methods: We conducted a phase I trial using an accelerated dose escalation design in patients with refractory pancreatic cancer. Lapatinib was given on days 1 to 42 in combination with folinic acid 200 mg/m2 day + 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 (24 h) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 8 and 22 of a 43-day cycle (OFF). Toxicity and efficacy were evaluated. Results: In total, eighteen patients were enrolled: dose level 1 (1000 mg) was assigned to seven patients, dose level 2 (1250 mg), five patients; and dose level 3 (1500 mg), six patients. Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and/or neutropenic enterocolitis observed in two of six patients: one diarrhea III°, one diarrhea IV°, as well as neutropenic enterocolitis. The maximum tolerable dose of lapatinib was 1250 mg OD. Conclusions: The combination of lapatinib 1250 mg OD with platinum-containing chemotherapy is safe and feasible in patients with refractory pancreatic cancer and warrants further investigation.

Background CONKO-006 was designed for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with postsurgical R1 residual status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and sorafenib (GemSorafenib) compared with those of gemcitabine + placebo (GemP) for 12 cycles. Patients and methods This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was planned to detect an improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) from 42% to 60% after 18 months. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), safety and duration of treatment. Results 122 patients were included between 02/2008 and 09/2013; 57 were randomised to GemSorafenib and 65 to GemP. Patient characteristics were wellbalanced (GemSorafenib/GemP) in terms of median age (63/63 years), tumour size (T3/T4: 97/97%), and nodal positivity (86/85%). Grade 3/4 toxicities comprised diarrhoea (GemSorafenib: 12%; GemP: 2%), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (19%; 9%), fatigue (5%; 2%) and hypertension (5%; 2%), as well as neutropenia (18%; 25%) and thrombocytopenia (9%; 2%). By August 2017, 118 (97%) RFS event had occurred. There were no difference in RFS (median GemSorafenib: 8.5 versus GemP: 9.4 months; p = 0.730) nor OS (median GemSorafenib: 17.6 versus GemP: 17.5 months; p = 0.481). Landmark analyses suggest that patients who received more than six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy had significantly longer OS (p = 0.021). Conclusion CONKO-006 is the first randomised clinical trial to include exclusively patients with PDAC with postsurgical R1 status thus far. Sorafenib added to gemcitabine did neither improve RFS nor OS. However, postoperative treatment exceeding six months seemed to prolong survival and should be further investigated in these high-risk patients. Clinical trial information German Tumor Study Registry (Deutsches Krebsstudienregister), DRKS00000242.

Purpose Chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy is the standard in patients with initially nonmetastatic unresectable pancreatic cancer. Additional surgery is in discussion. The CONKO-007 multicenter randomized trial examines the value of radiotherapy. Our interim analysis showed a significant effect of surgery, which may be relevant to clinical practice. Methods One hundred eighty patients received induction chemotherapy (gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX). Patients without tumor progression were randomized to either chemotherapy alone or to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. At the end of therapy, a panel of five independent pancreatic surgeons judged the resectability of the tumor. Results Following induction chemotherapy, 126/180 patients (70.0%) were randomized to further treatment. Following study treatment, 36/126 patients (28.5%) underwent surgery; (R0: 25/126 [19.8%]; R1/R2/Rx [n = 11/126; 6.1%]). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better for patients with R0 resected tumors (median DFS and OS: 16.6 months and 26.5 months, respectively) than for nonoperated patients (median DFS and OS: 11.9 months and 16.5 months, respectively; p = 0.003). In the 25 patients with R0 resected tumors before treatment, only 6/113 (5.3%) of the recommendations of the panel surgeons recommended R0 resectability, compared with 17/48 (35.4%) after treatment (p Conclusion Tumor resectability of pancreatic cancer staged as unresectable at primary diagnosis should be reassessed after neoadjuvant treatment. The patient should undergo surgery if a resectability is reached, as this significantly improves their prognosis.

Purpose: We performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the CONKO-001 phase III trial to identify clinically relevant prognostic and predictive mutations and conducted a functional validation in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sequencing data. Experimental Design: Patients of the CONKO-001 trial received curatively intended surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine (Gem) or observation only (Obs). Tissue samples of 101 patients were evaluated by NGS of 37 genes. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for survival analysis. In addition, functional genomic analyses were performed in an NGS and RNA-sequencing dataset of 146 pancreatic tumors from TCGA. Results: The most common mutations in the CONKO cohort were KRAS (75%), TP53 (60%), SMAD4 (10%), CDKNA2 (9%), as well as SWI/SNF (12%) complex alterations. In untreated patients, TP53 mutations were a negative prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS; HR mut vs. WT 2.434, P = 0.005). With respect to gemcitabine treatment, TP53 mutations were a positive predictive factor for gemcitabine efficacy [TP53mut: HR for DFS Gem vs. Obs, 0.235 (0.130 – 0.423; P < 0.001); TP53wt: HR for DFS Gem vs. Obs, 0.794 (0.417 – 1.513; P = 0.483)] with a significant test for interaction (P = 0.003). In the TCGA dataset, TP53 mutations were associated with shortened DFS. Conclusions: In CONKO-001, the benefit from adjuvant gemcitabine was confined to the TP53mut patient group. This potentially clinical relevant observation needs to be confirmed in independent prospective studies. The sensitivity of TP53mut PDAC to gemcitabine in CONKO-001 provides a lead for further mechanistic investigations.

4008 Background: Chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care in nonresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The CONKO-007 trial studied the role of sequential CT and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: In this randomized multicenter phase III trial resectability was judged by an independent surgical board. Patients (pts) received induction chemotherapy (IC) for 3 months (3 cycles gemcitabine (Gem, 1000 mg/m² d1, 8, 15, q4w) or FOLFIRINOX (6 cycles, q2w)). After IC pts without progression were randomized to either continuing CT for another 3 months or receiving CRT (cumulative dose of 50.4Gy, single dose 1.8Gy + Gem 300 mg/m² weekly, followed by 1 cycle of Gem 1000 mg/m² at d1, 8, 15). The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS) since the begin of IC. Determination of sample size calculated 590 pts to be randomized. Due to the exclusion of pts with progressive disease after IC a total of 830 pts should be enrolled. Due to delayed patient accrual the primary endpoint was changed to R0 resection rate resulting in an estimated sample size of 525 pts. Results: Between 04/2013 and 02/2021 a total of 525 pts were enrolled in 47 sites. 402 pts received IC with FOLFIRINOX and 93 pts with Gem. After IC 190 pts were excluded due to progression or toxicity, 335 were randomized, their median FU was 16 months. Hematological toxicities were significantly increased in the CRT arm, non-hematological toxicities were comparable. R0 CRM- resection rate and pCR rate was significantly higher in the CRT arm. R1-resections occurred significantly more often in the CT arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.919, 95% CI 0.702-1.203, p=0.540) and OS (HR 0.964, 95% CI 0.760-1.225, p=0.766) did not differ significantly in both arms, whereas the PFS rate tended to be higher in the CRT arm after 2 years. OS rates for CRM- R0 surgery with 87.5. ± 0.05% (1y) and 67.2 ± 0.05% (2y) were significantly higher (p

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. It is suggested that survival in PDAC depends, among other things, on pattern of disease recurrence.We performed a pooled analysis of the adjuvant therapy studies CONKO-001, CONKO-005, and CONKO-006, including a total of 912 patients with regard to prognostic factors in patients with recurrent disease. Overall survival from disease recurrence (OS 2) and disease-free survival (DFS) from the day of surgery were expressed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank testing and Cox regression.Of 912 patients treated within the previously mentioned CONKO trials, we identified 689 patients with disease recurrence and defined site of relapse. In multivariable analysis, the presence of isolated pulmonary metastasis, low tumour grading, and low postoperative level of CA 19-9 remained significant factors for improved OS 2 and DFS. Furthermore, completeness of adjuvant gemcitabine-based treatment (OS 2: P = 0.006), number of relapse sites (OS 2: P = 0.015), and type of palliative first-line treatment (OS 2: P 0.001) significantly affected overall survival after disease recurrence in PDAC.Determining tumour subgroups using prognostic factors may be helpful to stratify PDAC patients for future clinical trials. In case of disease recurrence, the site of relapse may have a prognostic impact on subsequent survival. Further investigations are needed to identify differences in tumour biology, reflecting relapse patterns and the differing survival of PDAC patients.

Background The prognostic effect of tumour budding was retrospectively analysed in a cohort of 173 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the prospective clinical multicentre CONKO-001 trial. Methods Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole tissue slides were evaluated. In two independent approaches, the mean number of tumour buds was analysed according to the consensus criteria in colorectal cancer, in one 0.785 mm2 field of view and additionally in 10 high-power fields (HPF) (HPF = 0.238 mm2). Results Tumour budding was significantly associated with a higher tumour grade (p

Purpose Gemcitabine is standard of care in the adjuvant treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine has shown efficacy in the treatment of advanced PDAC and was considered to improve survival in patients with primarily resectable PDAC after R0 resection. Patients and Methods In an open-label, multicenter trial, patients were randomly assigned to one of two study arms: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, every 4 weeks plus erlotinib 100 mg once per day (GemErlo) or gemcitabine (Gem) alone for six cycles. The primary end point of the study was to improve disease-free survival (DFS) from 14 to 18 months by adding erlotinib to gemcitabine. Results In all, 436 patients were randomly assigned at 57 study centers between April 2008 and July 2013. A total of 361 instances (83%) of disease recurrence were observed after a median follow-up of 54 months. Median treatment duration was 22 weeks in both arms. There was no difference in median DFS (GemErlo 11.4 months; Gem 11.4 months) or median overall survival (GemErlo 24.5 months; Gem 26.5 months). There was a trend toward long-term survival in favor of GemErlo (estimated survival after 1, 2, and 5 years for GemErlo was 77%, 53%, and 25% v 79%, 54%, and 20% for Gem, respectively). The occurrence or the grade of rash was not associated with a better survival in the GemErlo arm. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, CONKO-005 is the first study to investigate the combination of chemotherapy and a targeted therapy in the adjuvant treatment of PDAC. GemErlo for 24 weeks did not improve DFS or overall survival over Gem.

Background We studied the prognostic effect of CD3-, CD8- and CD103-positive T lymphocytes in a cohort of 165 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) of the treatment group (adjuvant gemcitabine) and the untreated control group of the CONKO-001 study. Methods Immunohistochemical stainings on tissue microarrays (TMAs) against CD3, CD8 and CD103 were performed according to standard procedures. Results A high number of CD8-positive lymphocytes were significantly and independently associated with longer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population. Median DFS/OS were 7.4/18.1 months for patients with a low number of CD8-positive intratumoural lymphocytes ( ≤ 42 per 1 mm tissue core) and 12.7/25.2 months for patients with high numbers (>42 per 1-mm tissue core; p = 0.008/0.020; HR 0.62/0.65). The ratio of intraepithelial to total CD103-positive lymphocytes, but not total numbers of CD103-positive lymphocytes or CD103-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes, was associated with significantly improved DFS and OS in the overall study population (p = 0.022/0.009). Median DFS/OS was 5.9/15.7 for patients with a ratio of intraepithelial to total CD103-positive intratumoural lymphocytes higher than 0.3 and 11.6/24.7 for patients with a lower ratio. Conclusion T-lymphocyte subpopulations might be prognostic in resectable PDAC but need standardization and verification by further studies.

Die Diagnose eines Pankreaskarzinoms ist fur die Betroffenen aufgrund der ungunstigen Prognose in aller Regel niederschmetternd. Auch wenn eine Heilung nur selten gelingt, konnte die Prognose in jungster Vergangenheit durch die Entwicklung neuer Substanzen und Therapieregimes substanziell verbessert werden. So wurden etwa neue Operationstechniken entwickelt und adjuvante Therapieoptionen erprobt.

In pancreatic cancer there is a need for prognostic risk stratification and subsequent therapy strategies. Molecular analysis has shown in different cancers that variation in clinical behavior can be associated with specific alterations. The cell cycle regulators p16 and p53 belong to the most often alterated genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We analyzed protein expression of p16, p53 and Ki67 by immunohistochemistry in 162 tumours of the CONKO-001 trial that investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients. We could show that high proliferation of tumours and strong and consistent nuclear p53 expression by tumour cells is associated with a worse disease-free survival and overall survival in the overall study population. However, stratified analysis according to treatment arm revealed that the effect of deregulated p53 expression and high Ki67 expression was restricted to the disease free survival of patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine. In multivariable survival analysis, p53 did not retain its prognostic status. Our study supports the important role of p53 and Ki67 expression in PDAC. They provide prognostic information in patients with adjuvant gemcitabine treatment and may contribute to treatment decision. However, these results should be validated in further studies.

4515 Background: The APACT trial was one of the largest and most geographically diverse trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected PC, allowing for comparison of outcomes by geographic region. In this analysis, we report updated overall survival (OS) results for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and examine outcomes by geographic region. Methods: Treatment-naive patients with histologically confirmed PC, macroscopic complete resection, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 < 100 U/mL were eligible. Stratification factors were resection status (R0/R1) and lymph node status (positive/negative). Treatment was initiated ≤ 12 weeks postsurgery. Patients received nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 or Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival by independent review. Secondary endpoints were OS and safety. Results: The updated OS analysis (data cutoff date, January 2020) revealed a median OS of 41.8 months with nab-P + Gem compared with 37.7 months with Gem alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 - 0.97; nominal P = 0.047; Table). In each geographic region, the median OS with nab-P + Gem was numerically longer than with Gem alone. Conclusions: The updated OS analysis of the ITT population supports the previously reported trend favoring nab-P + Gem. The geographic regional analyses reveal numerically longer OS with nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone and variable outcomes by region; however, the differences do not support the trend observed in the ITT population, potentially due to limited sample sizes. Registration: EudraCT (2013-003398-91). Clinical trial information: NCT01964430 . [Table: see text]

Background High expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) is considered to predict survival in patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. A standard evaluation system for immunohistochemical analysis (antibody, scoring system) has not yet been established. Methods CONKO-001, a prospective randomised phase III study investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine (gem) as compared to observation (obs). Tumour samples of 156 patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry with the rabbit monoclonal antibody SP120 (Ventana Medical Systems) for expression of hENT1. Kaplan–Meier analyses for median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed in dependence of hENT1 expression measured analogously to Farrell et al. 2009 and Poplin et al. 2013. Results For the 88 gem and 68 obs patients, median DFS/OS was 12.9/22.7months and 6.2/19.1months. High hENT1 expression was not associated with improved median DFS (Farrell: no hENT1 22.2months, low hENT1 13.7months, high hENT1 12.1months, p =0.248; Poplin: low hENT1 13.2months versus high hENT1 11.5months, p =0.5) or median OS (Farrell: no hENT1 21.7months, low hENT1 24.7months, high hENT1 19.5, p =0.571; Poplin: low hENT1 24.4months versus high hENT1 19.7months, p =0.92;) in the gem group or in the obs group (median DFS Farrell: no hENT1 5.1months, low hENT1 6.2months, high hENT1 7.5months, p =0.375; Poplin: low hENT1 6.2months versus high hENT1 5.9months, p =0.83; median OS Farrell: no hENT1 20.2months, low hENT1 17.7months, high HENT1 19.1months, p =0.738; Poplin: low hENT1 17.7months versus high hENT1 20.4months, p =0.65) measured by the Farrell or Poplin Score. Conclusions We cannot confirm a predictive role of hENT1 measured by the clone SP120 rabbit antibody in our study population. Reproducible standard procedures are urgently needed prior to the implementation or exclusion of hENT1 as a predictive biomarker in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Trial registration ISRCTN34802808.

Die Prognose fur Patienten mit einem Pankreaskarzinom hat sich durch die Entwicklung neuer Substanzen und Therapieregime bereits deutlich verbessert, ist jedoch nach wie vor ungunstig. Hinsichtlich der Entwicklung wirksamerer Therapien werden verschiedene Ansatze diskutiert. Das wachsende Verstandnis fur das Mikroenvironment des Pankreaskarzinoms brachte dabei die Erkenntnis, welche wichtige Rolle es fur das Fortschreiten der Erkrankung und fur die Resistenz gegenuber Chemotherapeutika spielt. Substanzen wie nab-Paclitaxel und Erlotinib haben sich als Kombinationspartner fur Gemcitabin in der Therapie des fortgeschrittenen Pankreaskarzinoms bereits empfohlen. Weitere neue Substanzen sind Gegenstand aktueller Untersuchungen. Dieser Beitrag stellt neue Therapieansatze vor und prasentiert den aktuellen Wissensstand zur systemischen Therapie des fortgeschrittenen bzw. metastasierten Pankreaskarzinoms.

Background and Objectives The continuous progress in treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has lead to a re-evaluation of prognostic markers. In this study the prognostic relevance of DNA Index and classical histopathological parameters with regard to disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed within the CONKO-001 patient population. Methods One hundred forty three fresh-frozen paraffin-embedded tissue samples of the resected tumor specimen of the CONKO-001 patient population were available for DNA index analysis to evaluate its impact on patient outcome. Results Median DFS (7.3 vs. 14.3 months; P = 0.004) and median OS (16.6 vs. 29.2 months; P = 0.011) were significantly decreased in patients with a high DNA index (>1.4). Multivariate analysis revealed both DNA index (DFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.019) and tumor grading (DFS: P = 0.004; OS: P = 0.004) as individual prognostic markers for DFS and OS. The following prognostic subgroups were identified: good (low DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), intermediate (low DNA Index + G3 tumor grading or high DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), poor (high DNA Index + G3 tumor grading). Conclusion The DNA index/tumor grading constellation may serve as a helpful guide for personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:66–71. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Purpose Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), in addition to its high mortality, accounts for the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Enoxaparin, a low–molecular weight heparin, is effective in prevention and treatment of VTEs. Some small studies have indicated that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically proven APC were randomly assigned to ambulant first-line chemotherapy and prophylactic use of enoxaparin or chemotherapy alone to investigate the probable reduction in symptomatic VTEs and the impact on survival. Results A total of 312 patients were recruited as one of the protocol end points was reached. Within the first 3 months, the numbers of symptomatic VTEs were as follows: 15 of 152 patients in the observation group and two of 160 patients in the enoxaparin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; χ2 P = .001). The numbers of major bleeding events were as follows: five of 152 patients in the observation arm and seven of 160 patients in the enoxaparin arm (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.72; χ2 P = 1.0). Overall cumulative incidence rates of symptomatic VTEs were 15.1% (observation) and 6.4% (enoxaparin; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83; P = .01). Progression-free (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.32; P = .64) and overall survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.38; P = .44) did not differ between groups. Conclusion This study demonstrates the high efficacy and feasibility of primary pharmacologic prevention of symptomatic VTEs in outpatients with APC. Treatment efficacy was not affected by simultaneous treatment with enoxaparin in this trial setting.

In patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer, the prognosis is generally poor. Within recent years, new treatment options such as the FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) or the combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine have shown a clinically relevant survival benefit over the standard gemcitabine in patients with good performance status. Unfortunately, patients with hyperbilirubinaemia, who constitute a substantial proportion of the pancreatic cancer patients, have been excluded from most clinical studies. Consequently, our knowledge on the appropriate medical treatment of this patient group is limited. In a meeting of German medical oncology experts, the available clinical evidence and own clinical experience regarding the management of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and hyperbilirubinaemia was discussed. The present publication summarises the discussion outcomes with regard to appropriate management of these patients, including consensus-based recommendations for nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine treatment, according to the best available evidence. In summary, knowledge of the underlying aetiology of hyperbilirubinaemia and the metabolisation routes of the cytotoxic drugs is crucial before initiating chemotherapy. As effective treatment options should also be made available to patients with comorbid conditions, including hyperbilirubinaemia, the experts provide advice for an initial dose reduction of chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine based on the total bilirubin level in patients with biliary obstruction or extensive liver metastasis.

Ever since a pivotal study in 1997 demonstrated superiority of gemcitabine over 5-FU, gemcitabine monotherapy has, until recently, comprised the standard of care in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the emerging recognition of the pancreatic cancer microenvironment, including the particularly abundant stroma, as playing a key role in disease progression and resistance to chemotherapy has marked somewhat of a paradigm shift in the way treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer is viewed, with these very same biological defenses conversely offering an Achilles heel with which to combat this aggressive disease. Recently, this approach was validated for the first time in a pivotal phase III trial in which patients received nab-paclitaxel, a stroma-targeted drug, with gemcitabine. Overall survival was significantly (p

Background Long-term survival (LTS) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer is still uncommon, little data is available to identify long-term survivors. The CONKO-001 study, which established gemcitabine after resection as adjuvant therapy, may provide data to answer this question. Methods CONKO-001 pts with an overall survival ≥5 years were compared to those who survived

Presently, many questions exist about what the optimal regimen comprises for all stages and treatment settings for pancreatic cancer. Since the CONKO-001 trial, adjuvant therapy following resection has become standard of care; however, outcomes are poor, with most patients experiencing disease recurrence, and new therapies have yet to be validated. Furthermore, the value of adjuvant radiotherapy has still not been clearly defined. Targeted treatment in combination with chemotherapy has been mostly disappointing so far in the adjuvant setting but immunotherapy holds potential for improving survival outcomes. Neoadjuvant treatment does not appear to provide much benefit in resectable patients but in the small subgroup of patients with borderline resectable/unresectable locally advanced disease it may increase the possibility of an R0 resection and, consequently, a substantial increase in survival duration. Use of capecitabine-based radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced disease appears to be more efficacious and better tolerated than gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy, with respect to survival outcomes. However, as with adjuvant treatment, the benefit of adding radiotherapy has not yet been definitively demonstrated. In patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, targeting the stroma with nab-paclitaxel has shown promising results in a phase III trial setting when administered in combination with gemcitabine and, furthermore, this regimen is suitable for a broad range of patients due to its generally good tolerability profile. Because of its high toxicity, FOLFIRINOX is more suitable for younger patients with an excellent performance status who can withstand aggressive treatment and in patients with a worse performance status, gemcitabine monotherapy is considered to be a more appropriate treatment. Alternatively, gemcitabine in combination with erlotinib, the only targeted compound that has resulted in significant albeit small improvements in survival in patients with advanced disease, could be selected. However, the benefit-risk profile of this regimen is only favorable in a strictly defined, small patient subgroup who develop a treatment-related rash. Finally, with the elucidation of prognostic and predictive markers, treatment is expected to become ever more individualized, leading to improved efficacy outcomes and less unnecessary toxicity.

Pancreatic cancer has high incidence and mortality rates, and effective treatment remains a clinical challenge. As deregulation of the cytokine transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) contributes to the progression of pancreatic carcinoma, the TGF-β pathway has been targeted using various strategies, including small molecule inhibitors of TGF-βRI, TGF-β-specific neutralizing antibodies and antisense compounds. As increased TGF-β2 levels in serum or tumor tissue of patients with pancreatic cancer correlated with poor prognosis, inhibition of TGF-β2 synthesis via the antisense oligonucleotide trabedersen (AP 12009) is a promising approach.

This open-label, multi-center phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) plus gemcitabine (GFF) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The study is based on our completed dose finding phase I trial.A total of 90 patients (pts) were recruited between 02/2000 and 04/2002 to receive 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) (24 h, i.v.), FA 500 mg/m(2) (2 h, i.v.) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (30 min, i.v.) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Treatment was repeated on day 43 until disease progression. The primary objective was the 1-year survival rate. The trial was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.The 1-year survival rate was 25% [95% CI: 16-34], median overall survival was 6.8 months [95% CI: 5.13-8.45], 9 patients showed partial responses (PR) so that the overall response rate was 10.3%. Overall control rate (PR + stable disease for at least 6 months) was 56%. Median time to progression was 4.6 months [95% CI: 3.68-5.52]. In 402 GFF cycles, we observed adverse events grade 3 in up to 10% of patients and grade 4 below 5% of patients.The GFF combination appears to be effective and well tolerated. This intravenous regimen represents an intensified therapy with low frequency of toxicities and seems to be convenient for patients who are unable to get oral anti-neoplastic medication. After these encouraging results, the German CONKO-002 trial investigated the GFF regimen versus single-agent gemcitabine.

Mutations in K-ras are frequent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The association of these mutations to clinical features and their prognostic value are unclear. We used quantitative PCR with peptide nucleic acid mediated PCR clamping to specifically analyze 257 blood samples of 31 AML patients for K-ras codon 12 alterations. A total of 20 samples of nine patients harbored a K-ras mutation. The most frequent mutation was the GTT variant which causes an amino acid exchange from glycine to valine. Correlation with clinical data suggests K-ras mutations to be associated with higher age and a better response to anti-leukemic chemotherapy.

Der einzige kurative Therapieansatz beim Pankreaskarzinom besteht in der kompletten Resektion (R0), jedoch sind bei Diagnosestellung lediglich maximal 20% der Patienten resektabel. Die operationsbedingte Mortalitat ist in ausgewiesenen chirurgischen Zentren gering; allerdings erleidet die Mehrzahl der Patienten selbst nach kompletter pathologischer Resektion ein Rezidiv und verstirbt an der Erkrankung. Die mittlere Uberlebenszeit nach Resektion liegt zwischen 11 und 23 Monaten, das Funfjahresuberleben der operierten Patienten zwischen 10 und 25%. Aufgrund der aktuellen Datenlage ist die Durchfuhrung einer adjuvanten Chemotherapie zunehmend akzeptiert. Die guten Ergebnisse mit Gemcitabin zweier Studien haben gezeigt, dass sich eine stabile Datenlage fur die adjuvante Behandlung ergibt. In den Vereinigten Staaten wurde die Radiochemotherapie mit 5-Fluorouracil aufgrund der Ergebnisse einer randomisierten Studie der Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) als mogliche adjuvante Standardtherapie empfohlen. In Europa wird in der Regel keine Radiochemotherapie eingesetzt. Diese Diskrepanz resultiert aus Widerspruchlichkeiten der publizierten Studien, die z. T. relativ geringe Fallzahlen bzw. methodische Mangel aufweisen. Die Therapie mit Gemcitabin ist seit uber 10 Jahren nach Einfuhrung dieser Substanz die etablierte Standardtherapie in der palliativen Erkrankungssituation. Mit der zusatzlichen Gabe des Tyrosinkinaseinhibitors Erlotinib erzielen selektierte Patienten mit einer Hautreaktion einen deutlichen Uberlebensvorteil. Patienten in gutem Allgemeinzustand konnen nach individueller Abwagung primar einer kombinierten intensivierten Therapie zugefuhrt werden, da sich hier in den Subgruppen der jeweiligen Studien ein Uberlebensvorteil anzeigt.

OBJECTIVE We followed up the presence of Kirsten rat sarcoma (K-ras) mutations in plasma DNA and assessed its clinical value in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS Plasma samples (N = 430) of 56 patients with pancreatic cancer and 13 patients with pancreatitis were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction using peptide nucleic acid-mediated polymerase chain reaction clamping. RESULTS K-ras mutations could be detected in the plasma DNA of 20 patients with cancer (36%). No K-ras mutation was found in the plasma of patients with pancreatitis. In 7 (35%) of 20 patients with lowly or moderately elevated carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA 19-9) levels lower than 100 U/mL, the result of the assay was positive for K-ras mutation. The combination of K-ras and CA 19-9 level determination gave a sensitivity for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer of 91% (40/44) of the patients. Thirteen of 35 patients with pancreatic cancer (102 plasma samples) with elevated CA 19-9 levels (>35 U/mL) and altered K-ras gene showed significant correlation with elevated CA 19-9 levels (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS The summary of our approach of noninvasive, convenient, extremely high-sensitive K-ras mutation analysis in plasma might provide diagnostic and prognostic information to clinicians but will not be sufficient in a standardized early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. The combination with CA 19-9 assay is useful for detection and prognostic evaluation of pancreatic carcinoma.

Background: This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin (O), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) (OFF) as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after failure of first-line gemcitabine treatment. Patients and Methods: 37 patients with confirmed progressive disease on gemcitabine therapy were treated with OFF (O 85 mg/m2 days 8, 22; FA 500 mg/m2, followed by 5-FU 2,600mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, 22) every 6 weeks. Patients were treated on an outpatient basis and remained on treatment until disease progression. Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and effectiveness. We observed moderate hematotoxicity, the most common non-hematologic toxicity was neurotoxicity. A total of 12 patients had grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities: nausea and vomiting (4 patients), reversible neurotoxicity (5 patients), and diarrhea (3 patients). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Median time to progression was 12 (1–125) weeks. Survival in second line was 22 (4–326+) weeks. Overall disease control rate was 49% (complete remission = 3%; partial remission = 3%; stable disease > 12 weeks = 43%). Conclusions: This regimen is feasible and active with an acceptable toxicity profile; it can be safely administered in an outpatient setting. There is an urgent need for further investigation in phase III trials.

Die kontrastverstärkte Mehrschicht-Computertomographie (MSCT) hat sich als das Standard-Schnittbildverfahren sowohl zur Diagnostik als auch zur Therapiekontrolle von Leberläsionen durchgesetzt. Zur Abklärung der lokalen Verhältnisse vor einer Leberteilresektion kann die diffusionsgewichtete Magnetresonanztomographie (DWI-MRT) wichtige zusätzliche Befunde liefern. Um das Kriterium der R0-Resektion zu erfüllen, erscheint ein Sicherheitsabstand von 0,5 mm ausreichend. Eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie mit dem Ziel, die Tumorgröße zu verringern, kann parallel zur Pfortaderembolisation durchgeführt werden, ohne dass die perioperative Morbidität und Mortalität beeinträchtigt wird. Bezüglich des Managements primär resektabler Lebermetastasen besteht dringender Studienbedarf. Trotz der eher geringen Evidenz wird die adjuvante Chemotherapie in Deutschland derzeit breiter befürwortet als die perioperative Chemotherapie. Auch bezüglich der präoperativen Therapie bei Patienten mit (noch) nicht resektablen Lebermetastasen besteht erheblicher Studienbedarf. Bei KRAS-Wildtyp-Tumoren werden mit einer Cetuximab/Chemotherapie-Kombination hohe Ansprechraten (im Sinne einer metrischen Verkleinerung der Metastasen) erzielt. Bevacizumab/Chemotherapie-Kombinationen führen zu hohen pathohistologischen Komplett- und Partialremissionen. Welches der beste Parameter zur Erfolgsbeurteilung einer präoperativen Therapie ist, ist derzeit noch unbekannt, weshalb Vergleichsstudien mit dem Überleben als hartem Endpunkt durchgeführt werden müssen.

This prospective multicentre phase II study characterises the toxicity and activity of first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination therapy (CAPOX) in advanced biliary system adenocarcinomas. Patients received oxaliplatin (130 mg m(-2), day 1) plus capecitabine (1000 mg m(-2) b.i.d., days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified prospectively into two groups based on location of the primary (gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) versus intrahepatic mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)). Sixty-five patients were evaluable. The response rate in 47 patients with GBC/ECC was 27% (4% complete responses), and in 23 patients (49%) stable disease (SD) was encountered. In 18 patients with ICC, we observed no objective responses, but 6 patients (33%) had SD. Median survival was 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.0-15.6) for patients with GBC or ECC (GBC: 8.2 months; 95% CI, 4.3-11.7; ECC: 16.8 months; 95% CI, 12.7-20.5), and 5.2 months (95% CI, 0.6-9.8) for ICC patients. In both cohorts, therapy was well tolerated. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy (11 patients). Our data suggest that the CAPOX regimen is a well-tolerated and active treatment option for advanced ECC and GBC but might produce poorer results for ICC.