Search

Background: Same day discharge (SDD) may be considered in some patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA). Recent studies have demonstrated similar outcomes between SDD and admitted patients; however, most excluded pheochromocytoma and adrenal metastases. This study evaluates 30-day complications and hospital readmission in a large cohort of patients undergoing MIA. Methods: Adult patients undergoing MIA (2010–2020) for benign adrenal disorders, pheochromocytoma, and adrenal metastases were identified within the ACS-NSQIP database. Comparisons between patients having SDD versus admission were performed. Factors associated with 30-day complications and unplanned readmission were evaluated by multivariable regression modeling. Results: Of 7316 patients who underwent MIA, 254 had SDD. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although SDD patients had lower ASA class (p < 0.001) and were more likely to undergo MIA for nonfunctioning adenoma or primary aldosteronism (p = 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, higher ASA class and presence of medical comorbidities were associated with increased complications (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) and unplanned readmission (p < 0.001; p < 0.05). Additionally, prolonged operative time was associated with 30-day complications (p < 0.001). Notably, SDD was not associated with increased complications (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.38–1.61, p = 0.502) or unplanned readmission (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35–1.64, p = 0.490). The rate of SDD for MIA increased from 1.48% in 2017 to 10.81% in 2020. Conclusions: Not all patients undergoing MIA should have SDD; however, the current analysis demonstrates a trend toward SDD and supports its safety in select patients with adrenal metastases and benign adrenal disorders including pheochromocytoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is associated with significant operative time, hospital resources, and morbidity. We examine factors associated with hospital length of stay (LOS) and early overall survival (OS) after CRS/HIPEC.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC were evaluated for factors associated with LOS. Institutional learning curve influence was addressed by comparing early vs late cohorts. Variables with P < .200 after univariate analysis were considered for inclusion in multivariate linear regression modeling. Independent factors associated with OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: Seventy patients underwent CRS/HIPEC (mean age 52.3 years, 64.3% female, and 68.6% Caucasian). Presence of any surgical complication was found in 26 (37.1%), 28 (40%) remained intubated postoperatively, and the mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) score was 14.4 (±10.4). Mean intensive care unit and hospital LOS were 2.9 days (±2.3) and 9.6 days (±3.6), respectively. After adjusting for covariates, only shorter time to postoperative ambulation (regression coefficient .92, P = .001) and early extubation (regression coefficient -1.90, P = .018) were associated with decreased hospital LOS on multivariate analysis. Immediate postoperative extubation conferred an independent early survival benefit on Kaplan-Meier analysis (mean OS 714.8 vs 473.4 days, P = .010). There was no difference in hospital LOS or OS between early and late cohorts.Conclusion: Early postoperative extubation and shorter time to ambulation are associated with decreased hospital LOS. Moreover, CRS/HIPEC patients extubated immediately postoperatively have an early survival benefit. Every effort should be made to achieve early postoperative extubation and mobilization in CRS/HIPEC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the United States, patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer typically receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (chemo/XRT) over a 5-6 week period followed by a 6-10 week break prior to proctectomy. In the current study, we evaluate the utilization of restaging studies performed and detection of disease progression during this window.Methods: A retrospective review of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer was performed. Medical records were analyzed to collect clinicopathologic data and the performance and results of preoperative, early postoperative, and first surveillance CT and/or PET/CT in patients completing long course neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and undergoing proctectomy.Results: Between 2005 and 2017, 176 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma completed neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and underwent proctectomy. Preoperative restaging with CT CAP and/or CT/PET was performed in 72 (40.9%) patients with no detection of disease progression. Of the 104 patients without preoperative restaging, 1 had intraoperative detection of liver metastases and 31 had early postoperative reimaging (within 30 days of proctectomy) of which 2 had detection of new pulmonary metastases. Among 72 patients with no preoperative or early postoperative reimaging, first surveillance imaging was available in 47 and detected new metastases in 8 (17%).Discussion: In patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer who undergo long course neoadjuvant chemo/XRT, perioperative reimaging with CT CAP and/or PET/CT detects new metastases in a small percentage of patients. A multi-institutional, prospective analysis using standardized staging protocols is warranted to better determine the value of preoperative restaging in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the USA, most patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation (chemo/XRT) over 5–6 weeks followed by a 6–10-week break before proctectomy. As chemotherapy is delivered at radio-sensitizing doses, there is essentially a 3-month window during which potential systemic disease is untreated. Evidence regarding the utility of restaging patients prior to proctectomy is limited. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating the utility of restaging patients with rectal cancer after completion of long-course chemo/XRT, and reporting associated changes in management. Studies that were non-English, included <50 patients, or examining the diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities were excluded. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Results: Eight studies were identified including a total of 1251 patients restaged between completion of chemo/XRT and proctectomy. All studies were retrospective. Restaging identified new metastatic disease in 72 (6.0%) patients, with 4 studies reporting specific sites: liver (n = 28), lung (n = 8), adrenal (n = 1), bone (n = 1), and multiple sites (n = 7). Overall progression (distant or local) was detected in 88 (7.0%) patients and resulted in a change in management in 77 (87.5%) of these patients. Tumor-related prognostic characteristics were inconsistently reported among studies, precluding meta-analysis. Conclusions: Although restaging between completion of neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and proctectomy detects disease progression in only a small percentage of patients, findings alter the treatment plan in the vast majority of these patients. Multi-institutional collaboration with analysis of well-defined prognostic variables may better identify patients most likely to benefit from restaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis. A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed. Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11–2.18; P =.01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38–180.16; P <.01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72–4.15; P <.01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55–0.94; P =.01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21–0.46; P <.01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20–1.32; P =.17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01–3.53; P =.02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42–3.2; P =.04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65–0.85; P <.01). Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Catecholamine surge after traumatic injury may lead to dysautonomia with increased morbidity. Small retrospective studies have shown potential benefit of beta-blockers (BB) in trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study evaluates a large multiply injured cohort without TBI that received BB. Patients were identified from the trauma registry from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2011. Patients who received >1 dose of BB were compared to controls. Patients with TBI, length of stay (LOS) < 2 days, and prehospital BB were excluded. Outcomes were mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and LOS. Stepwise multivariable regression was used to identify variables significantly associated with mortality. During the study period, 19,151 eligible patients were admitted. The mean age was 39 years. Most were male (74%) and most sustained blunt mechanism (75%). A total of 1854 (11%) patients received BB. BB patients had longer LOS (16 vs 6 days), ICU LOS (7 vs 1 days), and higher mortality (2.8 vs 0.5%) (all P < 0.001). Multivariable regression demonstrated no benefit to BB after adjusting for potential confounding characteristics [odds ratio (OR) 0.952; confidence interval (CI) 0.620-1.461]. In conclusion, in this largest study to date, patients receiving BB were older, more severely injured, and had a higher mortality. Unlike TBI patients, multivariable regression showed no benefit from BB in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) pathway plays a paradoxical, context-dependent role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): a tumor-suppressive role in non-metastatic PDAC and a tumor-promotive role in metastatic PDAC. We hypothesize that non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling induces PDAC progression. Methods: We investigated the expression of non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling proteins (pMAPK14, PD-L1, pAkt and c-Myc) in patient-derived tissues, cell lines and an immunocompetent mouse model. Experimental models were complemented by comparing the signaling proteins in PDAC specimens from patients with various survival intervals. We manipulated models with TGF-β, gemcitabine (DNA synthesis inhibitor), galunisertib (TGF-β receptor inhibitor) and MK-2206 (Akt inhibitor) to investigate their effects on NF-κB, β-catenin, c-Myc and PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was also investigated in cancer cells and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) in a mouse model. Results: We found that tumors from patients with aggressive PDAC had higher levels of the non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling proteins pMAPK14, PD-L1, pAkt and c-Myc. In PDAC cells with high baseline β-catenin expression, TGF-β increased β-catenin expression while gemcitabine increased PD-L1 expression. Gemcitabine plus galunisertib decreased c-Myc and NF-κB expression, but induced PD-L1 expression in some cancer models. In mice, gemcitabine plus galunisertib treatment decreased metastases (p = 0.018), whereas galunisertib increased PD-L1 expression (p < 0.0001). In the mice, liver metastases contained more TAMs compared to the primary pancreatic tumors (p = 0.001), and TGF-β increased TAM PD-L1 expression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In PDAC, the non-SMAD-TGF-β signaling pathway leads to more aggressive phenotypes, TAM-induced immunosuppression and PD-L1 expression. The divergent effects of TGF-β ligand versus receptor inhibition in tumor cells versus TAMs may explain the TGF-β paradox. Further evaluation of each mechanism is expected to lead to the development of targeted therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To date, work-hour restrictions have not been imposed on attending surgeons in the United States. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of working an overnight trauma shift on outcomes of general surgery operations performed the next day by the post-call attending physician. Study Design: Consecutive patients over a 3.5-year period undergoing elective general surgical procedures were reviewed. Procedures were limited to hernia repairs (inguinal and ventral), cholecystectomies, and intestinal operations. Any operations that were performed the day after the attending surgeon had taken an overnight trauma shift were considered post-call (PC) cases; all other cases were considered nonpost-call (NP). Outcomes from the PC operations were compared with those from the NP operations. Results: There were 869 patients identified; 132 operations were performed PC and 737 were NP. The majority of operations included hernia repairs (46%), followed by cholecystectomies (35%), and intestinal procedures (19%). Overall, the PC operations did not differ from the NP operations with respect to complication rate (13.7% vs 13.5%, p = 0.93) or readmission within 30 days (5% vs 6%, p = 0.84). Additionally, multivariable logistic regression failed to identify an association between PC operations and the development of adverse outcomes. Follow-up was obtained for an average of 3 months. Conclusions: Performance of general surgery operations the day after an overnight in-hospital trauma shift did not affect complication rates or readmission rates. At this time, there is no compelling evidence to mandate work-hour restrictions for attending general surgeons. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]