Search

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumors and are highly aggressive. Invasion and migration are the main causes of poor prognosis and treatment resistance in gliomas. As migration and invasion occur, patient survival and prognosis decline dramatically. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding 21–23 nucleotides involved in regulating the malignant phenotype of gliomas, including migration and invasion. Numerous studies have demonstrated the mechanism and function of some miRNAs in glioma migration and invasion. However, the biological and clinical significance (including diagnosis, prognosis, and targeted therapy) of glioma migration and invasion-related miRNAs have not been systematically discussed. This paper reviews the progress of miRNAs-mediated migration and invasion studies in glioma and discusses the clinical value of migration and invasion-related miRNAs as potential biomarkers or targeted therapies for glioma. In addition, these findings are expected to translate into future directions and challenges for clinical applications. Although many biomarkers and their biological roles in glioma invasion and migration have been identified, none have been specific so far, and further exploration of clinical treatment is still in progress; therefore, we aimed to further identify specific markers that may guide clinical treatment and improve the quality of patient survival.

BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor associated with high morbidity and mortality rates with a poor prognosis. In recent years, studies on prognostic markers such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have increased; however, their conclusions remain controversial. Here, relevant literature was reviewed and a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the correlation between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in GBM.MethodsThe non-foundational literature on PD-L1 expression associated with OS in GBM up to February 2022 was searched in the PubMed, Metstr, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Literature was rigorously screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the total hazard ratio (HR), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsCalculating the combined HR value and corresponding 95% CI of HR=1.124 (95% CI: 1.047–1.201, P=0.000, I2 (I-squared)=48.8%), it was shown that PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with low OS in GBM patients. Although I2 = 48.8% < 50%, to make the results more credible, in the cutoff values ≥10% subgroup HR=1.37 (95% CI: 1.07–1.67, P=0.000, I2 = 0%), which was also the result found in the first meta-analysis. In contrast, in the cutoff value ≥5% subgroup HR=1.14 (95% CI: 0.98–1.30, P=0.000, I2 = 59.8%) and in the cutoff value median PD-L1 expression levels subgroup HR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.92–1.18, P=0.000, I2 = 0%), indicating that PD-L1 expression was not associated with low OS in GBM. Furthermore, in four studies, we found no significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and the progression-free survival of GBM (HR=1.14, 95% CI:0.40–1.88, P=0.03, I2 = 29.3%).ConclusionPD-L1 expression was significantly associated with low OS in GBM patients; however, this result needs to be interpreted with caution and requires a large, multicenter clinical study in patients with similar baseline data for further evaluation.

Objective: Although some meta-analyses have shown a correlation between a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and low survival in patients with gliomas, their conclusions are controversial, and no study has specifically explored the relationship between a high pre-treatment and pre-operative NLR and low survival in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Therefore, we further investigated this correlation through meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Metstr, and Cochrane databases in March 2022 for published literature related to high pre-treatment and pre-operative NLR and low survival in patients with GBM. The literature was rigorously searched according to inclusion and exclusion criteria to calculate the overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) corresponding to a high NLR using a random effects model. Results: The total HR for the pre-treatment and pre-operative NLR was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.17–1.75, p = 0.000, I2 = 76.5%), indicating a significant association between a high pre-treatment and pre-operative NLR, and low overall survival in patients with GBM. Sub-group analysis was performed because of the high heterogeneity. The results for the sub-group with a cut-off value of 4 showed an HR of 1.39 (95% CI: 1.12–1.65, p = 0.000, I2 = 22.2%), with significantly low heterogeneity, whereas those for the sub-group without a cut-off value of 4 showed an HR of 1.45 (95% CI: 1.01–1.89, p = 0.000, I2 = 83.3%). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that a high pre-treatment and pre-operative NLR suggests low survival in patients with GBM based on data from a large sample. Furthermore, the meta-regression analysis results indicate that underlying data, such as age and extent of surgical resection, lead to a high degree of heterogeneity, providing a theoretical basis for further research.