Search

BACKGROUND: Trials of the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large ischemic strokes have been carried out in limited populations. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, open-label, adaptive, international trial involving patients with stroke due to occlusion of the internal carotid artery or the first segment of the middle cerebral artery to assess endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours after onset. Patients had a large ischemic-core volume, defined as an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score of 3 to 5 (range, 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating larger infarction) or a core volume of at least 50 ml on computed tomography perfusion or diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular thrombectomy plus medical care or to medical care alone. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin scale score at 90 days (range, 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). Functional independence was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early for efficacy; 178 patients had been assigned to the thrombectomy group and 174 to the medical-care group. The generalized odds ratio for a shift in the distribution of modified Rankin scale scores toward better outcomes in favor of thrombectomy was 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 1.89; PcO.001). A total of 20% of the patients in the thrombectomy group and 7% in the medical-care group had functional independence (relative risk, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 5.51). Mortality was similar in the two groups. In the thrombectomy group, arterial access-site complications occurred in 5 patients, dissection in 10, cerebral-vessel perforation in 7, and transient vasospasm in 11. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient in the thrombectomy group and in 2 in the medical-care group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with large ischemic strokes, endovascular thrombectomy resulted in better functional outcomes than medical care but was associated with vascular complications. Cerebral hemorrhages were infrequent in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "Migraine Is Associated With Menorrhagia and Endometriosis," by G. E. Tietjen, A. Conway, C. Utley, W. T. Gunning and N. A. Herial that was published in the March 01, 2006 issue is presented.

Background: The incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and its effect on the outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with large core infarcts have not been well-characterized., Methods: SELECT2 trial follow-up imaging was evaluated using the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification (HBC) to define hemorrhage grade. The association of ICH with clinical outcomes and treatment effect was examined., Results: Of 351 included patients, 194 (55%) and 189 (54%) demonstrated intracranial and intracerebral hemorrhage, respectively, with a higher incidence in EVT (134 (75%) and 130 (73%)) versus medical management (MM) (60 (35%) and 59 (34%), both P<0.001). Hemorrhagic infarction type 1 (HBC=1a) and type 2 (HBC=1b) accounted for 93% of all hemorrhages. Parenchymal hematoma (PH) type 1 (HBC=1c) and type 2 (HBC=2) were observed in 1 (0.6%) EVT-treated and 4 (2.2%) MM patients. Symptomatic ICH (sICH) (SITS-MOST definition) was seen in 0.6% EVT patients and 1.2% MM patients. No trend for ICH with core volumes (P=0.10) or Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (P=0.74) was observed. Among EVT patients, the presence of any ICH did not worsen clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days: 4 (3-6) vs 4 (3-6); adjusted generalized OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.47, P>0.99) or modify EVT treatment effect (P interaction =0.77)., Conclusions: ICH was present in 75% of the EVT population, but PH or sICH were infrequent. The presence of any ICH did not worsen functional outcomes or modify EVT treatment effect at 90-day follow-up. The high rate of hemorrhages overall still represents an opportunity for adjunctive therapies in EVT patients with a large ischemic core., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MC has received consulting fees from Medtronic and Microvention. AH has received grants from RESCUE - ICAD – Medtronic. He has also reported consulting fees from Medtronic, Microvention, Stryker, and Cerenovus. SO-G has received grants from Stryker Neurovascular and Microvention. He has also received modest consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker Neurovascular, and Microvention. JB is a member of the speakers’ bureau for Stryker Neurovascular and Microvention, and holds leadership roles in Inspire S and A registries (Medtronics). TNN is a DSMB member for the SELECT2 trial and has received grants from Medtronic. SD is a DSMB member for the SELECT2 trial and on the advisory board for Medtronic. JF and LW are DSMB members for the SELECT2 trial. GA reports compensation from iSchemaView for consultant services; and stock holdings in iSchemaView. AS has received grant support from Stryker Neurovascular for the SELECT2 trial. He is also a member of the speaker’s bureau and advisory board for Stryker Neurovascular. The other authors have no competing interest relevant to this study., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Despite the well-established potent benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, access to MT has not been studied globally. We conducted a worldwide survey of countries on 6 continents to define MT access (MTA), the disparities in MTA, and its determinants on a global scale., Methods: Our survey was conducted in 75 countries through the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ global network between November 22, 2020, and February 28, 2021. The primary end points were the current annual MTA, MT operator availability, and MT center availability. MTA was defined as the estimated proportion of patients with LVO receiving MT in a given region annually. The availability metrics were defined as ([current MT operators×50/current annual number of estimated thrombectomy-eligible LVOs]×100 = MT operator availability) and ([current MT centers×150/current annual number of estimated thrombectomy-eligible LVOs]×100= MT center availability). The metrics used optimal MT volume per operator as 50 and an optimal MT volume per center as 150. Multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models were used to evaluate factors associated with MTA., Results: We received 887 responses from 67 countries. The median global MTA was 2.79% (interquartile range, 0.70-11.74). MTA was <1.0% for 18 (27%) countries and 0 for 7 (10%) countries. There was a 460-fold disparity between the highest and lowest nonzero MTA regions and low-income countries had 88% lower MTA compared with high-income countries. The global MT operator availability was 16.5% of optimal and the MT center availability was 20.8% of optimal. On multivariable regression, country income level (low or lower-middle versus high: odds ratio, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.04-0.12]), MT operator availability (odds ratio, 3.35 [95% CI, 2.07-5.42]), MT center availability (odds ratio, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.84-4.48]), and presence of prehospital acute stroke bypass protocol (odds ratio, 4.00 [95% CI, 1.70-9.42]) were significantly associated with increased odds of MTA., Conclusions: Access to MT on a global level is extremely low, with enormous disparities between countries by income level. The significant determinants of MT access are the country's per capita gross national income, prehospital LVO triage policy, and MT operator and center availability.

Introduction: Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD) is estimated to cause over 10% of strokes annually in the US alone. Previous investigations employing stenting, most notably SAMMPRIS trial, have produced unfavorable results in regards to both periprocedural complications and risk of recurrent stroke. However, newer generation balloon-mounted drug-eluting stents (BM-DES) have been hypothesized to harbor several technical advantages that may confer improvements in these critical metrics., Methods: Prospectively maintained databases from eight comprehensive stroke centers were reviewed to identify adult patients undergoing RO-ZES for the treatment of sICAD between January,2019 and December,2021. Only patients that presented with either recurrent stroke or TIA, intracranial stenosis 70-99%, with at least one stroke on best medical management were included. The primary outcome was 30-days composite of stroke, ICH, and/or mortality. A propensity-score matched analyses was performed comparing the results of RO-ZES to the intervention arm of SAMMPRIS., Results: A total of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis (mean age:64.2 years). Mean severity of stenosis (±SD) was 81.4% (±11.4%). Four (3.03%) stroke and/or deaths were reported within 30 days in RO-ZES group. A propensity-score matched analysis based on age, HLD, HTN, DMII, and smoking demonstrated a statistically significant decreased risk of 30-day stroke and/or death rate in RO-ZES in comparison to SAMMPRIS (2.6% vs. 15.6%, respectively; OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.92-37.54, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Patients treated with RO-ZES had a decreased rate of 30-day major complications in comparison to SAMMPRIS. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RO-ZES for the treatment of sICAD., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.)

Background: The rise in popularity of social media (SoMe) in medicine has created a powerful tool for the professional development and continued education of clinicians. Numerous benefits of SoMe exist; however, significant challenges concerning professionalism, confidentiality, and spread of misinformation may limit its usefulness. To understand the ways the top 100 Twitter influencers interact with SoMe, their views on SoMe, and its future in the medical field., Methods: Literature was reviewed to obtain common concerns about SoMe in the medical field. A survey with 30 questions was sent to the top 100 Twitter influencers in the Neurosurgical field identified by Riccio et al. The survey assessed participant demographics, SoMe activity, stance toward SoMe, and views on the future of SoMe., Results: Most participants were in the age group of 35-44 years (n = 23, 44.2%), resided in the United States (n = 39, 73.6%), have been in practice for 6-10 years (n = 14, 26.4%), and ranked Twitter as the mostly used platform (n = 37,72.6%). Per participant Reponses, 35 (66%) participants have taken a political stance on SoMe, 0 (0%) have gotten into any legal issues regarding a post shared on SoMe, 45 (84.9%) agreed/strongly agreed that SoMe is essential for networking and mentorship, and 49 (92.3%) agreed/strongly agreed that that SoMe will continue to play a major role in the medical field., Conclusions: Although SoMe has its advantages, several disadvantages render it a double-edged sword. Maximizing SoMe's benefits and minimizing its misuse will further strengthen its role in the medical field., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Machine learning algorithms have received increased attention in neurosurgical literature for improved accuracy over traditional predictive methods. In this review, the authors sought to assess current applications of machine learning for outcome prediction of neurosurgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms and identify areas for future research., Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted for all studies utilizing machine learning for outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment. Patient characteristics, machine learning methods, outcomes of interest, and accuracy metrics were recorded from included studies., Results: 16 studies were ultimately included in qualitative synthesis. Studies primarily analyzed angiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, or complication prediction using clinical, radiological, or composite variables. The majority of included studies utilized supervised learning algorithms for analysis of dichotomized outcomes., Conclusions: Commonly included variables were demographics, presentation variables (including ruptured or unruptured status), and treatment used. Areas for future research include increased generalizability across institutions and for smaller datasets, as well as development of front-end tools for clinical applicability of published algorithms., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) have been implemented worldwide for stroke care, but outcome data are lacking to show their efficacy specifically in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Here, we include patients from our stroke network MSU and compare them to patients who arrived conventionally., Methods: A retrospective review of a stroke database was performed to identify patients who underwent MT after arrival via an MSU from August 2019 to December 2020. Demographic factors, past medical history, stroke characteristics, treatment variables, complications, and functional outcomes were recorded. These were compared to date-matched patients who underwent MT after arrival via conventional means., Results: Seven patients were treated with MT after arriving by an MSU. These patients were compared to 50 date-matched patients who underwent thrombectomy after arrival through conventional means. No statistically significant difference between cohorts was observed in terms of demographic variables, comorbidities, stroke characteristics, or tissue plasminogen activator administration. Patients from the MSU cohort had significantly shorter time from symptom onset to groin puncture time (191.33 minutes ±77.53 vs. 483.51 minutes ±322.66, P = 0.034). Importantly, MSU-transferred patients had significantly better discharge functional status measured by using the modified Rankin Scale (1.86 ± 1.35 vs. 3.57 ± 1.88, P = 0.024). No significant difference in final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score, complications, length of stay, or mortality was observed., Conclusions: Our pilot study demonstrates the efficacy of the MSU in decreasing door-to-puncture time and a concordant improvement in the discharge modified Rankin Scale score. Further prospective studies are needed to assess cost-efficacy and optimal protocol for MSUs in stroke care., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The anterior communicating artery (AcoA) is the most common location for intracranial aneurysms., Objective: To present occlusion outcomes, complication rate, recurrence rate, and predictors of recurrence in a large cohort with AcoA aneurysms treated primarily with endosaccular embolization. We also attempt to present data on the most effective treatment modality for recurrent AcoA aneurysms., Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study, reviewing the outcomes of 463 AcoA aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2003 and 2018., Results: The study cohort consisted of 463 patients. Adequate immediate occlusion was achieved in 418 (90.3%). Independent functional status at discharge was observed in 269 patients (58.0%), and the mortality rate was 6.8% (31). At 6 months, adequate occlusion was achieved in 418 (90.4%). Of all the patients, recurrence was observed in 101 cases (21.8%), and of those, 98 (22.4%) underwent retreatment. The combined frequency of retreatment for the coiling group was 42.4%, which was significantly higher than the 0 incident of retreatment in the clipping group (P < .0001). Among the retreatment cohort, there was a significantly higher subsequent retreatment rate in the endovascular group (0% in the clipping group vs 42.4% in the endovascular group, P < .0001)., Conclusion: Coiling with and without stent/balloon assistance is a relatively safe and effective modality for the treatment of AcoA aneurysms; however, in the setting of recurrence, microsurgical reconstruction leads to improved outcomes regarding durable occlusion, thus avoiding the potential for multiple interventions in the future., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.)

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, decreased volumes of stroke admissions and mechanical thrombectomy were reported. The study's objective was to examine whether subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) hospitalisations and ruptured aneurysm coiling interventions demonstrated similar declines., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study across 6 continents, 37 countries and 140 comprehensive stroke centres. Patients with the diagnosis of SAH, aneurysmal SAH, ruptured aneurysm coiling interventions and COVID-19 were identified by prospective aneurysm databases or by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes. The 3-month cumulative volume, monthly volumes for SAH hospitalisations and ruptured aneurysm coiling procedures were compared for the period before (1 year and immediately before) and during the pandemic, defined as 1 March-31 May 2020. The prior 1-year control period (1 March-31 May 2019) was obtained to account for seasonal variation., Findings: There was a significant decline in SAH hospitalisations, with 2044 admissions in the 3 months immediately before and 1585 admissions during the pandemic, representing a relative decline of 22.5% (95% CI -24.3% to -20.7%, p<0.0001). Embolisation of ruptured aneurysms declined with 1170-1035 procedures, respectively, representing an 11.5% (95%CI -13.5% to -9.8%, p=0.002) relative drop. Subgroup analysis was noted for aneurysmal SAH hospitalisation decline from 834 to 626 hospitalisations, a 24.9% relative decline (95% CI -28.0% to -22.1%, p<0.0001). A relative increase in ruptured aneurysm coiling was noted in low coiling volume hospitals of 41.1% (95% CI 32.3% to 50.6%, p=0.008) despite a decrease in SAH admissions in this tertile., Interpretation: There was a relative decrease in the volume of SAH hospitalisations, aneurysmal SAH hospitalisations and ruptured aneurysm embolisations during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings in SAH are consistent with a decrease in other emergencies, such as stroke and myocardial infarction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TNN: PI CLEAR study (Medtronic). DCH: Stryker, Vesalio, Cerenovus consultant. AEH: consultant and speaker for Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, Penumbra, Balt, Scientia, Genentech and GE Healthcare. PJ: Medtronic, Microvention, Balt, Cerenovus consultant. SO-G: Medtronic, Stryker consultant. DSL: Cerenovus, Genentech, Stryker, Medtronic consultant. TGJ: advisor/investor for Anaconda, Route92, FreeOx, and Blockade Medical; Medtronic grants, DAWN, AURORA PI (Stryker). WJM: consultant: Rebound Therapeutics, Viseon Imperative Care, Q’Apel, Stryker, Stream Biomedical, Spartan Micro; Investor: Cerebrotech, Endostream, Q’Apel, Viseon, Rebound, and Spartan Micro. RGN: Stryker; Cerenovus/Neuravi; Anaconda, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Vesalio (Advisory Board); Imperative Care., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Data in neurointerventional literature is extremely limited regarding the safety and efficacy of flow diversion using transradial access (TRA). We aim to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of intracranial aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) using TRA compared to transfemoral access (TFA)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and identified 79 consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular embolization for cerebral aneurysms using the PED from April 2018 through October 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: TRA (32 patients) and TFA (47 patients). A comparative analysis was performed between the two groups., Results: There was no significant difference in postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (p>.99), symptomatic ischemic stroke (p=.512), access site complications (p=.268), or other complications (p=.512). However, there was a significant increase in overall complications (14.9% vs. 0.0%, p=.038) and procedure duration (71.4 min ± 31.2 vs. 58.5 ± 20.3, p=.018) in the TFA group. There was no significant difference in complete occlusion at latest follow-up (19/25, 76.0% vs. 35/40, 87.5%; p=.311), 6-month follow-up (17/23, 73.9% vs. 33/38, 86.8%; p=.303), or 12-month follow-up (8/8, 100.0% vs. 5/6, 83.3%; p=.429). There was also no significant difference in rate of retreatment (p>.99), morbidity (p=.512), mortality (p>.99), latest follow-up (p=.985), or loss of follow-up (p=.298)., Conclusions: The feasibility and efficacy of flow diversion with the PED via TRA for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms is comparable to TFA. Widespread adoption of this approach may be facilitated by improvements in device navigation and manipulation via radial-specific engineering., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Background: CSF shunting is among the most widely utilized interventions in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunting (LPS) are 2 possible treatment modalities., Objective: To evaluate and compare complications, malfunction, infection, and revision rates associated with VPS compared to LPS., Methods: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify baseline and treatment characteristics for patients diagnosed with IIH treated with VPS or LPS., Results: A total of 163 patients treated with either VPS (74.2%) or LPS (25.8%) were identified. The mean follow-up was 35 mo. Shunt revision was required in 40.9% of patients. There was a nonsignificant higher rate of revision with LPS (52.4%) than VPS (36.4%, P = .07). In multivariate analysis, increasing patient age was associated with higher odds of shunt revision (P = .04). LPS had higher odds of shunt revision, yet this association was not significant (P = .06). Shunt malfunction was the main indication for revision occurring in 32.7%, with a significantly higher rate with LPS than VPS (P = .03). In total, 15 patients had shunt infection (9.4% VPS vs 12.2% LPS P = .50). The only significant predictor of procedural infection was the increasing number of revisions (P = .02)., Conclusion: The incidence of shunt revision was 40.9%, with increasing patient age as the sole predictor of shunt revision. The incidence of shunt malfunction was significantly higher in patients undergoing LPS, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of shunt infection between the 2 modalities., (© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.)

Background: Machine learning algorithms depend on accurate and representative datasets for training in order to become valuable clinical tools that are widely generalizable to a varied population. We aim to conduct a review of machine learning uses in stroke literature to assess the geographic distribution of datasets and patient cohorts used to train these models and compare them to stroke distribution to evaluate for disparities., Aims: 582 studies were identified on initial searching of the PubMed database. Of these studies, 106 full texts were assessed after title and abstract screening which resulted in 489 papers excluded. Of these 106 studies, 79 were excluded due to using cohorts from outside the United States or being review articles or editorials. 27 studies were thus included in this analysis., Summary of Review: Of the 27 studies included, 7 (25.9%) used patient data from California, 6 (22.2%) were multicenter, 3 (11.1%) were in Massachusetts, 2 (7.4%) each in Illinois, Missouri, and New York, and 1 (3.7%) each from South Carolina, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. 1 (3.7%) study used data from Utah and Texas. These were qualitatively compared to a CDC study showing the highest distribution of stroke in Mississippi (4.3%) followed by Oklahoma (3.4%), Washington D.C. (3.4%), Louisiana (3.3%), and Alabama (3.2%) while the prevalence in California was 2.6%., Conclusions: It is clear that a strong disconnect exists between the datasets and patient cohorts used in training machine learning algorithms in clinical research and the stroke distribution in which clinical tools using these algorithms will be implemented. In order to ensure a lack of bias and increase generalizability and accuracy in future machine learning studies, datasets using a varied patient population that reflects the unequal distribution of stroke risk factors would greatly benefit the usability of these tools and ensure accuracy on a nationwide scale., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to profound changes in the organization of health care systems worldwide., Aims: We sought to measure the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the volumes for mechanical thrombectomy, stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage hospitalizations over a three-month period at the height of the pandemic (1 March-31 May 2020) compared with two control three-month periods (immediately preceding and one year prior)., Methods: Retrospective, observational, international study, across 6 continents, 40 countries, and 187 comprehensive stroke centers. The diagnoses were identified by their ICD-10 codes and/or classifications in stroke databases at participating centers., Results: The hospitalization volumes for any stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mechanical thrombectomy were 26,699, 4002, and 5191 in the three months immediately before versus 21,576, 3540, and 4533 during the first three pandemic months, representing declines of 19.2% (95%CI, -19.7 to -18.7), 11.5% (95%CI, -12.6 to -10.6), and 12.7% (95%CI, -13.6 to -11.8), respectively. The decreases were noted across centers with high, mid, and low COVID-19 hospitalization burden, and also across high, mid, and low volume stroke/mechanical thrombectomy centers. High-volume COVID-19 centers (-20.5%) had greater declines in mechanical thrombectomy volumes than mid- (-10.1%) and low-volume (-8.7%) centers (p < 0.0001). There was a 1.5% stroke rate across 54,366 COVID-19 hospitalizations. SARS-CoV-2 infection was noted in 3.9% (784/20,250) of all stroke admissions., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a global decline in the volume of overall stroke hospitalizations, mechanical thrombectomy procedures, and intracranial hemorrhage admission volumes. Despite geographic variations, these volume reductions were observed regardless of COVID-19 hospitalization burden and pre-pandemic stroke/mechanical thrombectomy volumes.

The COVID-19 outbreak has led to fundamental disruptions of health care and its delivery with sweeping implications for patients and physicians of all specialties, including neurosurgery. In an effort to conserve hospital resources, neurosurgical procedures were classified into tiers to determine which procedures have to be performed in a timely fashion and which ones can be temporarily suspended to aid in the hospital's reallocation of resources when equipment is scarce. These guidelines were created quickly based on little existing evidence, and thus were initially variable and required refinement. As the early wave can now be assessed in retrospect, the authors describe the lessons learned and the protocols established based on published global evidence to continue to practice neurosurgery sensibly and minimize disruptions. These operational protocols can be applied in a surge of COVID-19 or another airborne pandemic., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neuroangiography has seen a recent shift from transfemoral to transradial access. In transradial neuroangiography, the right dominant hand is the main access used. However, the left side may be used specifically for left posterior circulation pathologies and when right access cannot be used. This study describes our initial experience with left radial access for diagnostic neuroangiography and assesses the feasibility and safety of this technique. We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of consecutive patients between April 2018 and January 2020, and identified 20 patients whom a left radial access was used for neurovascular procedures. Left transradial neuroangiography was successful in all 20 patients and provided the sought diagnostic information; no patient required conversion to right radial or femoral access. Pathology consisted of anterior circulation aneurysms in 17 patients (85%), brain tumor in 1 patient (5%), and intracranial atherosclerosis disease involving the middle cerebral artery in 2 patients (10%). The left radial artery was accessed at the anatomic snuffbox in 18 patients (90%) and the wrist in 2 patients (10%). A single vessel was accessed in 7 (35%), two vessels in 8 (40%), three vessels in 4 (20%), and four vessels in 1 (5%). Catheterization was successful in 71% of the cases for the right internal carotid artery and in only 7.7% for the left internal carotid artery. There were no instances of radial artery spasm, radial artery occlusion, or procedural complications. Our initial experience found the left transradial access to be a potentially feasible approach for diagnostic neuroangiography even beyond the left vertebral artery. The approach is strongly favored by patients but has significant limitations compared with the right-sided approach.

Background: The transradial approach (TRA) reduces mortality, morbidity, access site complications, hospital cost, and length of stay while maximizing patient satisfaction. We aimed to assess the technical success and safety of TRA for elderly patients (aged ≥75 years)., Methods: A retrospective chart review and comparative analysis was performed for elderly patients undergoing a diagnostic cerebral angiogram performed via TRA versus transfemoral approach (TFA). Also, a second comparative analysis was performed among the TRA cohort between elderly patients and their younger counterparts., Results: Comparative analysis in the elderly (TRA vs TFA) showed no significant differences for contrast dose per vessel (43.7 vs 34.6 mL, P=0.106), fluoroscopy time per vessel (5.7 vs 5.2 min, P=0.849), procedure duration (59.8 vs 65.2 min, P=0.057), conversion rate (5.8% vs 2.9%, P=0.650), and access site complications (2.3% vs 2.9%, P=1.00). Radiation exposure per vessel (18.9 vs 51.9 Gy cm 2 , P=0.001) was significantly lower in the elderly TRA group.The second comparison (TRA in elderly vs TRA in the young) showed no significant differences for contrast dose per vessel (43.7 vs 37.8 mL, P=0.185), radiation exposure per vessel (18.9 vs 16.5 Gy cm 2 , P=0.507), procedure duration (59.8 vs 58.3 min, P=0.788), access site complication (2.3% vs 1.7%, P=0.55), and conversation rate (5.8% vs 1.8%, P=0.092). A trend for prolonged fluoroscopy time per vessel (5.7 vs 4.7 min, P=0.050) was observed in the elderly TRA group., Conclusions: TRA is a technically feasible and safe option for diagnostic neurointerventional procedures in the elderly. Our small elderly cohort was not powered enough to show a significant difference in terms of access site complications between TRA and TFA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PJ is a consultant for Medtronic and MicroVention. SIT and MRG are consultants for Stryker., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Posterior circulation tandem occlusions are poorly characterized in current literature. Data regarding endovascular approaches and outcomes in this patient subgroup is extremely limited., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and identified 17 patients with posterior circulation tandem occlusions who underwent mechanical thrombectomy between 2014 and 2019., Results: Of 17 patients with posterior circulation tandem occlusion, the mean age was 55.76 ± 11.8 with 35.3% female. The mean NIHSS score on presentation was 17.2 ± 9.2. Tissue plasminogen activator was administered in 7 (41.2%) patients, stent-retrievers alone were used in 2 (11.8%), aspiration catheters alone were used in 2 (11.8%), a combination was used 12 (70.6%), and a self-expandable stent in 5 (29.4%). The mean number of device passes was 2.24 ± 2.02, recanalization failure occurred in 4 (23.5%) patients, the mean time from stroke onset to puncture was 6.9 ± 2.4 h, and the mean time from puncture to recanalization was 59.3 ± 26.6 min. Postprocedural symptomatic ICH occurred in 1 (5.9 %) patient, periprocedural ICH/SAH occurred in 2 (11.8%), periprocedural distal emboli occurred in 0 (0%), periprocedural vessel dissection occurred in 1 (5.9%), and periprocedural vessel perforation occurred in 1 (5.9%) patient. TICI score>2b was achieved in 13 (76.5%) patients. An improvement in NIHSS>3 at discharge occurred in 10 (58.8%) patients, and good outcomes (mRS score < 2) occurred in 7 (41.2%). The mean length of stay was 11.6 ± 12.2 days, and the mortality rate was 41.2%., Conclusion: Endovascular intervention with mechanical thrombectomy is safe and feasible in patients with posterior circulation tandem occlusions., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)