Search

Fair resource allocation is undoubtedly a crucial factor in customer satisfaction in several scheduling scenarios. This is especially apparent in repetitive scheduling models where the same set of clients repeatedly submits jobs on a daily basis. In this paper, we aim to analyze a repetitive scheduling system involving a set of $n$ clients and a set of $m$ days. On every day, each client submits a request to process a job exactly within a specific time interval, which may vary from day to day, modeling the scenario where the scheduling is done Just-In-Time (JIT). The daily schedule is executed on a single machine that can process a single job at a time, therefore it is not possible to schedule jobs with intersecting time intervals. Accordingly, a feasible solution corresponds to sets of jobs with disjoint time intervals, one set per day. We define the quality of service (QoS) that a client receives as the number of executed jobs over the $m$ days period. Our objective is to provide a feasible solution where each client has at least $k$ days where his jobs are processed. We prove that this problem is NP-hard even under various natural restrictions such as identical processing times and day-independent due dates. We also provide efficient algorithms for several special cases and analyze the parameterized tractability of the problem with respect to several parameters, providing both parameterized hardness and tractability results.

This paper resolves a long-standing open question in bicriteria scheduling regarding the complexity of a single machine scheduling problem which combines the number of tardy jobs and the maximal tardiness criteria. We use the lexicographic approach with the maximal tardiness being the primary criterion. Accordingly, the objective is to find, among all solutions minimizing the maximal tardiness, the one which has the minimum number of tardy jobs. The complexity of this problem has been open for over thirty years, and has been known since then to be one of the most challenging open questions in multicriteria scheduling. We resolve this question by proving that the problem is strongly NP-hard. We also prove that the problem is at least weakly NP-hard when we switch roles between the two criteria (i.e., when the number of tardy jobs is the primary criterion). Finally, we provide hardness results for two other approaches (constraint and a priori approaches) to deal with these two criteria.

We consider the $1||\sum w_J U_j$ problem, the problem of minimizing the weighted number of tardy jobs on a single machine. This problem is one of the most basic and fundamental problems in scheduling theory, with several different applications both in theory and practice. We prove that $1||\sum w_J U_j$ is W[1]-hard with respect to the number $p_{\#}$ of different processing times in the input, as well as with respect to the number $w_{\#}$ of different weights in the input. This, along with previous work, provides a complete picture for $1||\sum w_J U_j$ from the perspective of parameterized complexity, as well as almost tight complexity bounds for the problem under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH).

This paper focuses on kernelization algorithms for the fundamental Knapsack problem. A kernelization algorithm (or kernel) is a polynomial-time reduction from a problem onto itself, where the output size is bounded by a function of some problem-specific parameter. Such algorithms provide a theoretical model for data reduction and preprocessing and are central in the area of parameterized complexity. In this way, a kernel for Knapsack for some parameter $k$ reduces any instance of Knapsack to an equivalent instance of size at most $f(k)$ in polynomial time, for some computable function $f(\cdot)$. When $f(k)=k^{O(1)}$ then we call such a reduction a polynomial kernel. Our study focuses on two natural parameters for Knapsack: The number of different item weights $w_{\#}$, and the number of different item profits $p_{\#}$. Our main technical contribution is a proof showing that Knapsack does not admit a polynomial kernel for any of these two parameters under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions. Our proof discovers an elaborate application of the standard kernelization lower bound framework, and develops along the way novel ideas that should be useful for other problems as well. We complement our lower bounds by showing the Knapsack admits a polynomial kernel for the combined parameter $w_{\#}+p_{\#}$.

We provide new (parameterized) computational hardness results for Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines. It is a classical scheduling problem motivated from just-in-time or lean manufacturing, where the goal is to complete jobs exactly at their deadline. We are given $n$ jobs and $m$ machines. Each job has a deadline, a weight, and a processing time that may be different on each machine. The goal is find a schedule that maximized the total weight of jobs completed exactly at their deadline. Note that this uniquely defines a processing time interval for each job on each machine. Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines is closely related to coloring interval graphs and has been thoroughly studied for several decades. However, as pointed out by Mnich and van Bevern [Computers \& Operations Research, 2018], the parameterized complexity for the number $m$ of machines as a parameter remained open. We resolve this by showing that Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number $m$ of machines. To this end, we prove W[1]-hardness with respect to $m$ of the special case where we have parallel machines with eligible machine sets for jobs. This answers Open Problem 8 of Mnich and van Bevern's list of 15 open problems in the parameterized complexity of scheduling [Computers \& Operations Research, 2018]. Furthermore, we resolve the computational complexity status of the unweighted version of Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines by proving that it is NP-complete. This answers an open question by Sung and Vlach [Journal of Scheduling, 2005].

The $1 \mid \mid \Sigma w_j U_j$ problem asks to determine -- given $n$ jobs each with its own processing time, weight, and due date -- the minimum weighted number of tardy jobs in any single machine non-preemptive schedule for these jobs. This is a classical scheduling problem that generalizes both Knapsack, and Subset Sum. The best known pseudo-polynomial algorithm for $1 \mid \mid \Sigma w_j U_j$, due to Lawler and Moore [Management Science'69], dates back to the late 60s and has a running time of $O(d_{\max}n)$, where $n$ is the number of jobs and $d_{\max}$ is their maximal due date. A recent lower bound by Cygan \emph{et al.}~[ICALP'19] for Knapsack shows that $1 \mid \mid \Sigma w_j U_j$ cannot be solved in $\widetilde{O}((n+d_{\max})^{2-\varepsilon})$ time, for any $\varepsilon > 0$, under a plausible conjecture. This still leaves a gap between the best known lower bound and upper bound for the problem. In this paper we design a new simple algorithm for $1 \mid \mid \Sigma w_j U_j$ that uses $(\max,+)$-convolutions as its main tool, and outperforms the Lawler and Moore algorithm under several parameter ranges. In particular, depending on the specific method of computing $(\max,+)$-convolutions, its running time can be bounded by - $\widetilde{O}(n+d_{\#}d_{\max}^2)$. - $\widetilde{O}(d_{\#}n +d^2_{\#}d_{\max}w_{\max})$. - $\widetilde{O}(d_{\#}n +d_{\#}d_{\max}p_{\max})$. - $\widetilde{O}(n^2 +d_{\max}w^2_{\max})$. - $\widetilde{O}(n^2 + d_{\#}(d_{\max}w_{\max})^{1.5})$. Here, $d_{\#}$ denotes the number of \emph{different} due dates in the instance, $p_{\max}$ denotes the maximum processing time of any job, and $w_{\max}$ denotes the maximum weight of any job.

Recent research found that fairness plays a key role in customer satisfaction. Therefore, many manufacturing and services industries have become aware of the need to treat customers fairly. Still, there is a huge lack of models that enable industries to make operational decisions fairly, such as a fair scheduling of the customers' jobs. Our main aim in this research is to provide a unified framework to enable schedulers making fair decisions in repetitive scheduling environments. For doing so, we consider a set of repetitive scheduling problems involving a set of $n$ clients. In each out of $q$ consecutive operational periods (e.g. days), each one of the customers submits a job for processing by an operational system. The scheduler's aim is to provide a schedule for each of the $q$ periods such that the quality of service (QoS) received by each of the clients will meet a certain predefined threshold. The QoS of a client may take several different forms, e.g., the number of days that the customer receives its job later than a given due-date, the number of times the customer receive his preferred time slot for service, or the sum of waiting times for service. We analyze the single machine variant of the problem for several different definitions of QoS, and classify the complexity of the corresponding problems using the theories of classical and parameterized complexity. We also study the price of fairness, i.e., the loss in the system's efficiency that results from the need to provide fair solutions.

Temporal graphs have been recently introduced to model changes to a given network that occur throughout a fixed period of time. The Temporal $\Delta$ Clique problem, that generalizes the well known Clique problem to temporal graphs, has been studied in the context of finding nodes of interest in dynamic networks [TCS '16]. We introduce the Temporal $\Delta$ Independent Set problem, a temporal generalization of Independent Set. This problem is e.g. motivated in the context of finding conflict-free schedules for maximum subsets of tasks, that have certain (changing) constraints on each day they need to be performed. We are specifically interested in the case where each task needs to be performed in a certain time-interval on each day and two tasks are in conflict on a certain day if their time-intervals on that day overlap. This leads us to considering both problems on the restricted class of temporal unit interval graphs, i.e., temporal graphs where each layer is a unit interval graph. We present several hardness results as well as positive results. On the algorithmic side, we provide constant-factor approximation algorithms for instances of both problems where $\tau$, the total number of time steps (layers) of the temporal graph, and $\Delta$, a parameter that allows us to model conflict tolerance, are constants. We develop an exact FPT algorithm for Temporal $\Delta$ Clique with respect to parameter $\tau+k$. Finally, we use the notion of order preservation for temporal unit interval graphs that, informally, requires the intervals of every layer to obey a common ordering. For both problems we provide an FPT algorithm parameterized by the size of minimum vertex deletion set to order preservation.

A polynomial Turing kernel for some parameterized problem $P$ is a polynomial-time algorithm that solves $P$ using queries to an oracle of $P$ whose sizes are upper-bounded by some polynomial in the parameter. Here the term "polynomial" refers to the bound on the query sizes, as the running time of any kernel is required to be polynomial. One of the most important open goals in parameterized complexity is to understand the applicability and limitations of polynomial Turing Kernels. As any fixed-parameter tractable problem admits a Turing kernel of some size, the focus has mostly being on determining which problems admit such kernels whose query sizes can be indeed bounded by some polynomial. In this paper we take a different approach, and instead focus on the number of queries that a Turing kernel uses, assuming it is restricted to using only polynomial sized queries. Our study focuses on one the main problems studied in parameterized complexity, the Clique problem: Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, determine whether there are $k$ pairwise adjacent vertices in $G$. We show that Clique parameterized by several structural parameters exhibits the following phenomena: - It admits polynomial Turing kernels which use a sublinear number of queries, namely $O(n/\log^c n)$ queries where $n$ is the total size of the graph and $c$ is any constant. This holds even for a very restrictive type of Turing kernels which we call OR-kernels. - It does not admit polynomial Turing kernels which use $O(n^{1-\epsilon})$ queries, unless NP$\subseteq$coNP/poly. For proving the second item above, we develop a new framework for bounding the number of queries needed by polynomial Turing kernels. This framework is inspired by the standard lower bounds framework for Karp kernels, and while it is quite similar, it still requires some novel ideas to allow its extension to the Turing setting.

Finding the ground state of an Ising-spin glass on general graphs belongs to the class of NP-hard problems, widely believed to have no efficient polynomial-time algorithms for solving them. An approach developed in computer science for dealing with such problems is to devise approximation algorithms that run in polynomial time, and provide solutions with provable guarantees on their quality in terms of the optimal unknown solution. Recently, several algorithms for the Ising-spin glass problem on a graph that provide different approximation guarantees were introduced albeit without implementation. Also recently, D-wave company constructed a physical realization of an adiabatic quantum computer, and enabled researchers to access it. D-wave is particularly suited for computing an approximation for the ground state of an Ising spin glass on its chimera graph -- a graph with bounded degree. In this work, we compare the performance of a recently developed approximation algorithm for solving the Ising spin glass problem on graphs of bounded degree against the D-wave computer. We also compared a heuristic tailored specifically to handle the fixed D-wave chimera graph. D-wave computer was able to find better approximations to all the random instances we studied. Furthermore the convergence times of D-wave were also significantly better. These results indicate the merit of D-wave computer under certain specific instances. More broadly, our method is relevant to other performance comparison studies. We suggest that it is important to compare the performance of quantum computers not only against exact classical algorithms with exponential run-time scaling, but also to approximation algorithms with polynomial run-time scaling and a provable guarantee on performance., Comment: 7 pages, 5 figures

We introduce a natural but seemingly yet unstudied generalization of the problem of scheduling jobs on a single machine so as to minimize the number of tardy jobs. Our generalization lies in simultaneously considering several instances of the problem at once. In particular, we have $n$ clients over a period of $m$ days, where each client has a single job with its own processing time and deadline per day. Our goal is to provide a schedule for each of the $m$ days, so that each client is guaranteed to have their job meet its deadline in at least $k \le m$ days. This corresponds to an equitable schedule where each client is guaranteed a minimal level of service throughout the period of $m$ days. We provide a thorough analysis of the computational complexity of three main variants of this problem, identifying both efficient algorithms and worst-case intractability results.

Given a matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$, we consider the problem of maximizing $x^TAx$ subject to the constraint $x \in \{-1,1\}^n$. This problem, called MaxQP by Charikar and Wirth [FOCS'04], generalizes MaxCut and has natural applications in data clustering and in the study of disordered magnetic phases of matter. Charikar and Wirth showed that the problem admits an $\Omega(1/\lg n)$ approximation via semidefinite programming, and Alon, Makarychev, Makarychev, and Naor [STOC'05] showed that the same approach yields an $\Omega(1)$ approximation when $A$ corresponds to a graph of bounded chromatic number. Both these results rely on solving the semidefinite relaxation of MaxQP, whose currently best running time is $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5}\cdot \min\{N,n^{1.5}\})$, where $N$ is the number of nonzero entries in $A$ and $\tilde{O}$ ignores polylogarithmic factors. In this sequel, we abandon the semidefinite approach and design purely combinatorial approximation algorithms for special cases of MaxQP where $A$ is sparse (i.e., has $O(n)$ nonzero entries). Our algorithms are superior to the semidefinite approach in terms of running time, yet are still competitive in terms of their approximation guarantees. More specifically, we show that: - MaxQP admits a $(1/2\Delta)$-approximation in $O(n \lg n)$ time, where $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of the corresponding graph. - UnitMaxQP, where $A \in \{-1,0,1\}^{n\times n}$, admits a $(1/2d)$-approximation in $O(n)$ time when the corresponding graph is $d$-degenerate, and a $(1/3\delta)$-approximation in $O(n^{1.5})$ time when the corresponding graph has $\delta n$ edges. - MaxQP admits a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation in $O(n)$ time when the corresponding graph and each of its minors have bounded local treewidth. - UnitMaxQP admits a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation in $O(n^2)$ time when the corresponding graph is $H$-minor free.

We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most $d$, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time $2^{{\cal O}(d^2)}$, which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvo\v{r}\'ak et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time $f(d)$ for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function $f$. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth $d$ from doubly-exponential in $d$ to $d^{{\cal O}(d)}$. As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter $k$ and a dynamic graph $G$, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: - Does $G$ contain a simple path on $k$ vertices? - Does $G$ contain a simple cycle on at least $k$ vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time $2^{{\cal O}(k^2)}$. In the second case, the amortized update time is $2^{{\cal O}(k^4)} + {\cal O}(k \log n)$. In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of $G$., Comment: 74 pages, 5 figures

Given $N$ instances $(X_1,t_1),\ldots,(X_N,t_N)$ of Subset Sum, the AND Subset Sum problem asks to determine whether all of these instances are yes-instances; that is, whether each set of integers $X_i$ has a subset that sums up to the target integer $t_i$. We prove that this problem cannot be solved in time $\tilde{O}((N \cdot t_{max})^{1-\epsilon})$, for $t_{max}=\max_i t_i$ and any $\epsilon > 0$, assuming the $\forall \exists$ Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis ($\forall \exists$-SETH). We then use this result to exclude $\tilde{O}(n+P_{max} \cdot n^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithms for several scheduling problems on $n$ jobs with maximum processing time $P_{max}$, based on $\forall \exists$-SETH. These include classical problems such as $1||\sum w_jU_j$, the problem of minimizing the total weight of tardy jobs on a single machine, and $P_2||\sum U_j$, the problem of minimizing the number of tardy jobs on two identical parallel machines., Comment: 14 pages, ICALP'20

This paper is concerned with the $1||\sum p_jU_j$ problem, the problem of minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs on a single machine. This is not only a fundamental scheduling problem, but also a very important problem from a theoretical point of view as it generalizes the Subset Sum problem and is closely related to the 0/1-Knapsack problem. The problem is well-known to be NP-hard, but only in a weak sense, meaning it admits pseudo-polynomial time algorithms. The fastest known pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for the problem is the famous Lawler and Moore algorithm which runs in $O(P \cdot n)$ time, where $P$ is the total processing time of all $n$ jobs in the input. This algorithm has been developed in the late 60s, and has yet to be improved to date. In this paper we develop two new algorithms for $1||\sum p_jU_j$, each improving on Lawler and Moore's algorithm in a different scenario. Both algorithms rely on basic primitive operations between sets of integers and vectors of integers for the speedup in their running times. The second algorithm relies on fast polynomial multiplication as its main engine, while for the first algorithm we define a new "skewed" version of $(\max,\min)$-convolution which is interesting in its own right., Comment: 12 pages; ICALP'20 (A)

Computing cohesive subgraphs is a central problem in graph theory. While many formulations of cohesive subgraphs lead to NP-hard problems, finding a densest subgraph can be done in polynomial time. As such, the densest subgraph model has emerged as the most popular notion of cohesiveness. Recently, the data mining community has started looking into the problem of computing k densest subgraphs in a given graph, rather than one, with various restrictions on the possible overlap between the subgraphs. However, there seems to be very little known on this important and natural generalization from a theoretical perspective. In this paper we hope to remedy this situation by analyzing three natural variants of the k densest subgraphs problem. Each variant differs depending on the amount of overlap that is allowed between the subgraphs. In one extreme, when no overlap is allowed, we prove that the problem is NP-hard for k >= 3. On the other extreme, when overlap is allowed without any restrictions and the solution subgraphs only have to be distinct, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to k, and admits a PTAS for constant k. Finally, when a limited of overlap is allowed between the subgraphs, we prove that the problem is NP-hard for k = 2.

The $1|B,r_j|\sum w_jU_j$ scheduling problem takes as input a batch setup time $\Delta$ and a set of $n$ jobs, each having a processing time, a release date, a weight, and a due date; the task is to find a sequence of batches that minimizes the weighted number of tardy jobs. This problem was introduced by Hochbaum and Landy in 1994; as a wide generalization of {\sc Knapsack}, it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. In this work we provide a multivariate complexity analysis of the $1|B,r_j|\sum w_jU_j$ problem with respect to several natural parameters. That is, we establish a thorough classification into fixed-parameter tractable and $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hard problems, for parameter combinations of (i) $\#p$ = distinct number of processing times, (ii) $\#w$ = number of distinct weights, (iii) $\#d$ = number of distinct due dates, (iv) $\#r$ = number of distinct release dates, and (v) $b$ = batch sizes. Thereby, we significantly extend the work of Hermelin et al. (2018) who analyzed the parameterized complexity of the non-batch variant of this problem without release dates. As one of our key results, we prove that $1|B,r_j|\sum w_jU_j$ is $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hard parameterized by the number of distinct processing times and distinct due dates. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first parameterized intractability results for scheduling problems with few distinct processing times. Further, we show that $1|B,r_j|\sum w_jU_j$ is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to parameter $\#p+\#d+\#r$ and with respect to parameter $\#w+\#d$ if there is just a single release date. Both results hold even if the number of jobs per batch is limited by some integer $b$.

We consider the clustering aggregation problem in which we are given a set of clusterings and want to find an aggregated clustering which minimizes the sum of mismatches to the input clusterings. In the binary case (each clustering is a bipartition) this problem was known to be NP-hard under Turing reductions. We strengthen this result by providing a polynomial-time many-one reduction. Our result also implies that no $2^{o(n)}\cdot |I'|^{O(1)}$-time algorithm exists that solves any given clustering instance $I'$ with $n$ elements, unless the \ETH{} fails. On the positive side, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of input clusterings and we give an integer linear programming formulation.

In this paper we consider the $p$-Norm Hamming Centroid problem which asks to determine whether some given binary strings have a centroid with a bound on the $p$-norm of its Hamming distances to the strings. Specifically, given a set of strings $S$ and a real $k$, we consider the problem of determining whether there exists a string $s^*$ with $\big(\sum_{s \in S}d^p(s^*,s)\big)^{1/p} \leq k$, where $d(,)$ denotes the Hamming distance metric. This problem has important applications in data clustering, and is a generalization of the well-known polynomial-time solvable \textsc{Consensus String} $(p=1)$ problem, as well as the NP-hard \textsc{Closest String} $(p=\infty)$ problem. Our main result shows that the problem is NP-hard for all fixed rational $p > 1$, closing the gap for all rational values of $p$ between $1$ and $\infty$. Under standard complexity assumptions the reduction also implies that the problem has no $2^{o(n+m)}$-time or $2^{o(k^{\frac{p}{(p+1)}})}$-time algorithm, where $m$ denotes the number of input strings and $n$ denotes the length of each string, for any fixed $p > 1$. Both running time lower bounds are tight. In particular, we provide a $2^{k^{\frac{p}{(p+1)}+\varepsilon}}$-time algorithm for each fixed $\varepsilon > 0$. In the last part of the paper, we complement our hardness result by presenting a fixed-parameter algorithm and a factor-$2$ approximation algorithm for the problem., Comment: To appear at ESA 2019

We investigate a variant of the so-called "Internet Shopping Problem" introduced by Blazewicz et al. (2010), where a customer wants to buy a list of products at the lowest possible total cost from shops which offer discounts when purchases exceed a certain threshold. Although the problem is NP-hard, we provide exact algorithms for several cases, e.g. when each shop sells only two items, and an FPT algorithm for the number of items, or for the number of shops when all prices are equal. We complement each result with hardness proofs in order to draw a tight boundary between tractable and intractable cases. Finally, we give an approximation algorithm and hardness results for the problem of maximising the sum of discounts., Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures, to appear at the 13th International Computer Science Symposium in Russia (CSR 2018)

In this paper we study the classical single machine scheduling problem where the objective is to minimize the total weight of tardy jobs. Our analysis focuses on the case where one or more of three natural parameters is either constant or is taken as a parameter in the sense of parameterized complexity. These three parameters are the number of different due dates, processing times, and weights in our set of input jobs. We show that the problem belongs to the class of fixed parameter tractable (FPT)problems when combining any two of these three parameters. We also show that the problem is polynomial-time solvable when the latter two parameters are constant, complementing Karp's result who showed that the problem is NP-hard already for a single due date.

Since its development in the early 90's, parameterized complexity has been widely used to analyze the tractability of many NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems with respect to various types of problem parameters. While the generic nature of the framework allows the analysis of any combinatorial problem, the main focus along the years was on analyzing graph problems. In this paper we diverge from this trend by studying the parameterized complexity of Just-In-Time (JIT) flow-shop scheduling problems. Our analysis focuses on the case where the number of due dates is considerably smaller than the number of jobs, and can thus be considered as a parameter. We prove that the two-machine problem is W[1]-hard with respect to this parameter, even if all processing times on the second machine are of unit length, while the problem is in XP even for a parameterized number of machines. We then move on to study the tractability of the problem when combining the different number of due dates with either the number of different weights or the number of different processing times on the first machine. We prove that in both cases the problem is fixed-parameter tractable for the two machine case, and is W[1]-hard for three or more machines.

Scheduling theory is an old and well-established area in combinatorial optimization, whereas the much younger area of parameterized complexity has only recently gained the attention of the community. Our aim is to bring these two areas closer together by studying the parameterized complexity of a class of single-machine two-agent scheduling problems. Our analysis focuses on the case where the number of jobs belonging to the second agent is considerably smaller than the number of jobs belonging to the first agent, and thus can be considered as a fixed parameter k. We study a variety of combinations of scheduling criteria for the two agents, and for each such combination we pinpoint its parameterized complexity with respect to the parameter k. The scheduling criteria that we analyze include the total weighted completion time, the total weighted number of tardy jobs, and the total weighted number of just-in-time jobs. Our analysis draws a borderline between tractable and intractable variants of these problems.

The classic Stable Roommates problem (which is the non-bipartite generalization of the well-known Stable Marriage problem) asks whether there is a stable matching for a given set of agents, i.e. a partitioning of the agents into disjoint pairs such that no two agents induce a blocking pair. Herein, each agent has a preference list denoting who it prefers to have as a partner, and two agents are blocking if they prefer to be with each other rather than with their assigned partners. Since stable matchings may not be unique, we study an NP-hard optimization variant of Stable Roommates, called Egal Stable Roommates, which seeks to find a stable matching with a minimum egalitarian cost {\gamma}, i.e. the sum of the dissatisfaction of the agents is minimum. The dissatisfaction of an agent is the number of agents that this agent prefers over its partner if it is matched; otherwise it is the length of its preference list. We also study almost stable matchings, called Min-Block-Pair Stable Roommates, which seeks to find a matching with a minimum number {\beta} of blocking pairs. Our main result is that Egal Stable Roommates parameterized by {\gamma} is fixed-parameter tractable, while Min-Block-Pair Stable Roommates parameterized by {\beta} is W[1]-hard, even if the length of each preference list is at most five.

Subset-Sum and k-SAT are two of the most extensively studied problems in computer science, and conjectures about their hardness are among the cornerstones of fine-grained complexity. One of the most intriguing open problems in this area is to base the hardness of one of these problems on the other. Our main result is a tight reduction from k-SAT to Subset-Sum on dense instances, proving that Bellman's 1962 pseudo-polynomial $O^{*}(T)$-time algorithm for Subset-Sum on $n$ numbers and target $T$ cannot be improved to time $T^{1-\varepsilon}\cdot 2^{o(n)}$ for any $\varepsilon>0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. This is one of the strongest known connections between any two of the core problems of fine-grained complexity. As a corollary, we prove a "Direct-OR" theorem for Subset-Sum under SETH, offering a new tool for proving conditional lower bounds: It is now possible to assume that deciding whether one out of $N$ given instances of Subset-Sum is a YES instance requires time $(N T)^{1-o(1)}$. As an application of this corollary, we prove a tight SETH-based lower bound for the classical Bicriteria s,t-Path problem, which is extensively studied in Operations Research. We separate its complexity from that of Subset-Sum: On graphs with $m$ edges and edge lengths bounded by $L$, we show that the $O(Lm)$ pseudo-polynomial time algorithm by Joksch from 1966 cannot be improved to $\tilde{O}(L+m)$, in contrast to a recent improvement for Subset Sum (Bringmann, SODA 2017)., Comment: 23 pages, presented at SODA'19 and accepted at TALG

In this paper, we study the problem of wireless sensor network (WSN) maintenance using mobile entities called mules. The mules are deployed in the area of the WSN in such a way that would minimize the time it takes them to reach a failed sensor and fix it. The mules must constantly optimize their collective deployment to account for occupied mules. The objective is to define the optimal deployment and task allocation strategy for the mules, so that the sensors' downtime and the mules' traveling distance are minimized. Our solutions are inspired by research in the field of computational geometry and the design of our algorithms is based on state of the art approximation algorithms for the classical problem of facility location. Our empirical results demonstrate how cooperation enhances the team's performance, and indicate that a combination of k-Median based deployment with closest-available task allocation provides the best results in terms of minimizing the sensors' downtime but is inefficient in terms of the mules' travel distance. A k-Centroid based deployment produces good results in both criteria., Comment: 12 pages, 6 figures, conference

Kernelization---a mathematical key concept for provably effective polynomial-time preprocessing of NP-hard problems---plays a central role in parameterized complexity and has triggered an extensive line of research. This is in part due to a lower bounds framework that allows to exclude polynomial-size kernels under the assumption of NP $\nsubseteq$ coNP$/$poly. In this paper we consider a restricted yet natural variant of kernelization, namely strict kernelization, where one is not allowed to increase the parameter of the reduced instance (the kernel) by more than an additive constant. Building on earlier work of Chen, Flum, and M\"{u}ller [Theory Comput. Syst. 2011] and developing a general and remarkably simple framework, we show that a variety of FPT problems does not admit strict polynomial kernels under the weaker assumption of P $\neq$ NP. In particular, we show that various (multicolored) graph problems and Turing machine computation problems do not admit strict polynomial kernels unless P $=$ NP. To this end, a key concept we use are diminishable problems; these are parameterized problems that allow to decrease the parameter of the input instance by at least one in polynomial time, thereby outputting an equivalent problem instance. Finally, we study a relaxation of the notion of strict kernels and reveal its limitations.

The composition technique is a popular method for excluding polynomial-size problem kernels for NP-hard parameterized problems. We present a new technique exploiting triangle-based fractal structures for extending the range of applicability of compositions. Our technique makes it possible to prove new no-polynomial-kernel results for a number of problems dealing with length-bounded cuts. In particular, answering an open question of Golovach and Thilikos [Discrete Optim. 2011], we show that, unless NP $\subseteq$ coNP / poly, the NP-hard Length-Bounded Edge-Cut (LBEC) problem (delete at most $k$ edges such that the resulting graph has no $s$-$t$ path of length shorter than $\ell$) parameterized by the combination of $k$ and $\ell$ has no polynomial-size problem kernel. Our framework applies to planar as well as directed variants of the basic problems and also applies to both edge and vertex deletion problems. Along the way, we show that LBEC remains NP-hard on planar graphs, a result which we believe is interesting in its own right., Comment: An extended abstract appeared in Proc. of the 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). A full version will appear in SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics (SIDMA)

We consider the following natural graph cut problem called Critical Node Cut (CNC): Given a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, and two positive integers $k$ and $x$, determine whether $G$ has a set of $k$ vertices whose removal leaves $G$ with at most $x$ connected pairs of vertices. We analyze this problem in the framework of parameterized complexity. That is, we are interested in whether or not this problem is solvable in $f(\kappa) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time (i.e., whether or not it is fixed-parameter tractable), for various natural parameters $\kappa$. We consider four such parameters: - The size $k$ of the required cut. - The upper bound $x$ on the number of remaining connected pairs. - The lower bound $y$ on the number of connected pairs to be removed. - The treewidth $w$ of $G$. We determine whether or not CNC is fixed-parameter tractable for each of these parameters. We determine this also for all possible aggregations of these four parameters, apart from $w+k$. Moreover, we also determine whether or not CNC admits a polynomial kernel for all these parameterizations. That is, whether or not there is an algorithm that reduces each instance of CNC in polynomial time to an equivalent instance of size $\kappa^{O(1)}$, where $\kappa$ is the given parameter.

The k-Clique problem is a fundamental combinatorial problem that plays a prominent role in classical as well as in parameterized complexity theory. It is among the most well-known NP-complete and W[1]-complete problems. Moreover, its average-case complexity analysis has created a long thread of research already since the 1970s. Here, we continue this line of research by studying the dependence of the average-case complexity of the k-Clique problem on the parameter k. To this end, we define two natural parameterized analogs of efficient average-case algorithms. We then show that k-Clique admits both analogues for Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi random graphs of arbitrary density. We also show that k-Clique is unlikely to admit neither of these analogs for some specific computable input distribution.

The Steiner Multicut problem asks, given an undirected graph G, terminals sets T1,...,Tt $\subseteq$ V(G) of size at most p, and an integer k, whether there is a set S of at most k edges or nodes s.t. of each set Ti at least one pair of terminals is in different connected components of G \ S. This problem generalizes several graph cut problems, in particular the Multicut problem (the case p = 2), which is fixed-parameter tractable for the parameter k [Marx and Razgon, Bousquet et al., STOC 2011]. We provide a dichotomy of the parameterized complexity of Steiner Multicut. That is, for any combination of k, t, p, and the treewidth tw(G) as constant, parameter, or unbounded, and for all versions of the problem (edge deletion and node deletion with and without deletable terminals), we prove either that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable or that the problem is hard (W[1]-hard or even (para-)NP-complete). We highlight that: - The edge deletion version of Steiner Multicut is fixed-parameter tractable for the parameter k+t on general graphs (but has no polynomial kernel, even on trees). We present two proofs: one using the randomized contractions technique of Chitnis et al, and one relying on new structural lemmas that decompose the Steiner cut into important separators and minimal s-t cuts. - In contrast, both node deletion versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard for the parameter k+t on general graphs. - All versions of Steiner Multicut are W[1]-hard for the parameter k, even when p=3 and the graph is a tree plus one node. Hence, the results of Marx and Razgon, and Bousquet et al. do not generalize to Steiner Multicut. Since we allow k, t, p, and tw(G) to be any constants, our characterization includes a dichotomy for Steiner Multicut on trees (for tw(G) = 1), and a polynomial time versus NP-hardness dichotomy (by restricting k,t,p,tw(G) to constant or unbounded)., Comment: As submitted to journal. This version also adds a proof of fixed-parameter tractability for parameter k+t using the technique of randomized contractions

In binary jumbled pattern matching we wish to preprocess a binary string $S$ in order to answer queries $(i,j)$ which ask for a substring of $S$ that is of size $i$ and has exactly $j$ 1-bits. The problem naturally generalizes to node-labeled trees and graphs by replacing "substring" with "connected subgraph". In this paper, we give an ${n^2}/{2^{\Omega(\log n/\log \log n)^{1/2}}}$ time solution for both strings and trees. This odd-looking time complexity improves the state of the art $O(n^2/\log^2 n)$ solutions by more than any poly-logarithmic factor. It originates from the recent seminal algorithm of Williams for min-plus matrix multiplication. We obtain the result by giving a black box reduction from trees to strings. This is then combined with a reduction from strings to min-plus matrix multiplications.

In this paper we consider kernelization for problems on d-degenerate graphs, i.e. graphs such that any subgraph contains a vertex of degree at most $d$. This graph class generalizes many classes of graphs for which effective kernelization is known to exist, e.g. planar graphs, H-minor free graphs, and H-topological-minor free graphs. We show that for several natural problems on d-degenerate graphs the best known kernelization upper bounds are essentially tight., Comment: Full version of ESA 2013